1
Newsdesk 116 http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 5 February 2006 A study that combines clinical and basic research suggests that brain oestrogen deficiency may be a risk factor for developing the neuro- pathology seen in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Rena Li (Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ, USA) and colleagues report that oestrogen concentrations in post-mortem brains from women with AD are reduced compared with matched controls without AD. Furthermore, amyloid- (A) plaque formation occurs earlier in oestrogen-deficient APP23 mice than in control APP23 mice (a model for AD). “We plan to use this animal model to screen for drugs that can increase the effect of brain oestrogen rather than peripheral oestrogen, an approach that should avoid the potential side-effects of hormone replacement therapy [HRT]”, notes Li. Women have a higher risk of developing AD than do men. One explanation for this is that after the menopause the decline of gonadal oestrogen can make neurons more susceptible to age-related neuro- degenerative processes. However, although some studies support this Low brain oestrogen linked to Alzheimer’s disease risk US scientists have shown that recalling memories could depend on the brain reconstructing the type of cortical activity that took place during their formation (Science 2005; 310: 1963–66), and that by tracking the build-up of these patterns an observer can actually predict the type of memory an individual is about to recall. “Our results show that when we try to recall something we first reinstate the general context of the memory we are looking for. After this we may work towards the specifics by rebuilding the representations that were active during the original experience that we are trying to retrieve”, explains Sean Polyn (Center for the Study of Brain, Mind, and Behavior, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA). “In other words, we appear to start a memory search using a more general ‘category specific’ brain activity pattern to cue the recall of specific items.” Polyn’s team used functional MRI (fMRI) to record the brain patterns produced when human volunteers studied three categories of 30 objects: pictures of famous people, famous places, and everyday items. The volunteers made judgments about the pictures (eg, how much they liked or disliked the celebrities presented) to create recordable and recognisable mental contexts for their fMRI readings. The researchers identified specific activity patterns associated with the study of the three different categories. “Some time later the volunteers were given 3 min to recall what they had seen in these study lists in any order their memories came to them, and we checked to see whether there were any recognisable brain activity patterns associated with these recalls”, explains Polyn. Sure enough, the same category-specific brain activity patterns appeared during this recall phase, matching the categories to which the to-be-recalled objects and verbally communicated objects belonged. “If the contextual reinstatement of memories really occurs, then this should take time as we search ever deeper levels of detail before reaching the exact memory we are looking for”, explains Polyn. “So we looked at the time lag between the appearance of the recognisable category-specific patterns and the actual moment when the subjects vocalised their recalls. We found that the category-specific brain activity appeared several seconds before subjects stated their recalled memories; while we could not identify the specific item that would be recalled, we could tell to what category their next memory recall was going to belong.” The results also show how we might forget things. If this top-down fashion of cueing for additional details finally allows us to arrive at specific, recallable events, weak cues might prevent us from reconstructing the necessary cortical activity, blocking our recall of information even though it has been properly stored. “This finding confirms long-held ideas about how memories are stored and retrieved”, remarked Howard Eichenbaum (Boston University, MA, USA). “The brain has no special warehouse, file case, or hard disk just for storing information. Instead, as Endel Tulving put it, ‘Memory involves turning time’s arrow into a loop, mentally regenerating a past experience, and the act of recollection occurs as a result of reactivation of the same areas that were engaged during the initial experience.’” Adrian Burton Recalling memories needs reconstruction of cortical activity Human beings dredge up memories by a process of mental time travel David A Hardy/Science Photo Library Rights were not granted to include this image in electronic media. Please refer to the printed journal.

Recalling memories needs reconstruction of cortical activity

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Newsdesk

116 http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 5 February 2006

A study that combines clinical andbasic research suggests that brainoestrogen deficiency may be a riskfactor for developing the neuro-pathology seen in Alzheimer’s disease(AD). Rena Li (Sun Health ResearchInstitute, Sun City, AZ, USA) andcolleagues report that oestrogenconcentrations in post-mortem brainsfrom women with AD are reduced

compared with matched controlswithout AD. Furthermore, amyloid-�(A�) plaque formation occurs earlier inoestrogen-deficient APP23 mice thanin control APP23 mice (a model forAD). “We plan to use this animalmodel to screen for drugs that canincrease the effect of brain oestrogenrather than peripheral oestrogen, anapproach that should avoid the

potential side-effects of hormonereplacement therapy [HRT]”, notes Li.

Women have a higher risk ofdeveloping AD than do men. Oneexplanation for this is that after themenopause the decline of gonadaloestrogen can make neurons moresusceptible to age-related neuro-degenerative processes. However,although some studies support this

Low brain oestrogen linked to Alzheimer’s disease risk

US scientists have shown that recallingmemories could depend on the brainreconstructing the type of corticalactivity that took place during theirformation (Science 2005; 310:1963–66), and that by tracking thebuild-up of these patterns an observercan actually predict the type of memoryan individual is about to recall.

“Our results show that when we tryto recall something we first reinstatethe general context of the memory weare looking for. After this we may worktowards the specifics by rebuilding therepresentations that were active duringthe original experience that we aretrying to retrieve”, explains Sean Polyn(Center for the Study of Brain, Mind,and Behavior, Princeton University,Princeton, NJ, USA). “In other words,we appear to start a memory searchusing a more general ‘category specific’

brain activity pattern to cue the recall ofspecific items.”

Polyn’s team used functional MRI(fMRI) to record the brain patternsproduced when human volunteersstudied three categories of 30 objects:pictures of famous people, famousplaces, and everyday items. Thevolunteers made judgments about thepictures (eg, how much they liked ordisliked the celebrities presented) tocreate recordable and recognisablemental contexts for their fMRIreadings. The researchers identifiedspecific activity patterns associatedwith the study of the three differentcategories.

“Some time later the volunteerswere given 3 min to recall what theyhad seen in these study lists in anyorder their memories came to them,and we checked to see whether therewere any recognisable brain activitypatterns associated with these recalls”,explains Polyn. Sure enough, thesame category-specific brain activitypatterns appeared during this recallphase, matching the categories towhich the to-be-recalled objectsand verbally communicated objectsbelonged.

“If the contextual reinstatement ofmemories really occurs, then thisshould take time as we search everdeeper levels of detail before reachingthe exact memory we are looking for”,explains Polyn. “So we looked at the

time lag between the appearance ofthe recognisable category-specificpatterns and the actual moment whenthe subjects vocalised their recalls. Wefound that the category-specific brainactivity appeared several secondsbefore subjects stated their recalledmemories; while we could not identifythe specific item that would berecalled, we could tell to whatcategory their next memory recall wasgoing to belong.”

The results also show how we mightforget things. If this top-down fashionof cueing for additional details finallyallows us to arrive at specific, recallableevents, weak cues might prevent usfrom reconstructing the necessarycortical activity, blocking our recall ofinformation even though it has beenproperly stored.

“This finding confirms long-heldideas about how memories are storedand retrieved”, remarked HowardEichenbaum (Boston University, MA,USA). “The brain has no specialwarehouse, file case, or hard disk justfor storing information. Instead, asEndel Tulving put it, ‘Memoryinvolves turning time’s arrow into aloop, mentally regenerating a pastexperience, and the act of recollectionoccurs as a result of reactivation of thesame areas that were engaged duringthe initial experience.’”

Adrian Burton

Recalling memories needs reconstruction of cortical activity

Human beings dredge up memories by a process of mental time travel

Dav

id A

Har

dy/S

cien

ce P

hoto

Lib

rary

Rights were not granted to include thisimage in electronic media. Please refer to

the printed journal.