56
Reactors and Fuels Allen G. Croff Short Course: Introduction to Nuclear Chemistry and Fuel Cycle Separations Vanderbilt University December 16, 2008

Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

Reactors and Fuels

Allen G. Croff

Short Course: Introduction to Nuclear Chemistry and Fuel Cycle Separations

Vanderbilt University

December 16, 2008

Page 2: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

2

Focus On:

Characteristics relevant to separation of used nuclear reactor fuel into its constituent parts: nuclear fuel reprocessing–

Minimal discussion of nuclear reactors per se

Fuels most relevant to the U.S. and separations

Civilian nuclear power

Page 3: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

3

Outline•

Metal clad fuels: oxide and variants–

Description and fabrication

Fuels for many reactors•

Light-water reactors (LWRs)

Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs)–

Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs)

Fast Reactors cooled with Na, K, Bi, Pb, He

Graphite-based fuels–

Description of fuels and how they are fabricated

High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors (HTGRs)–

Also called Very-High-Temperature Reactors (VHTRs)

Pebble-Bed Modular (Gas Cooled) Reactor (PBMR)

Spent fuel characteristics

Page 4: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

Metal-Clad Fuels

Page 5: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

5

Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR)•

Dimensions: square, H=4.1m, 21cm x 21 cm

Weight: 460 kgU, 520 kg UO2

, 135 kg hardware–

Hardware mostly Zircaloy

(Zr

with Sn, Fe, Cr)

Grid spacers: Zircaloy, Inconel, stainless steel–

End pieces: Stainless steel, Inconel

Fuel element array: 14 x 14 to 17 x 17•

Fuel element size: 1 cm OD, H=3.9m

Enrichment: 3-5%•

May have separate burnable poison rods

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: A.G. Croff et al, “Revised Uranium-Plutonium Cycle PWR and BWR Models for the ORIGEN Computer Code,” ORNL/TM-6051 (September 1978). �
Page 6: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

6

Pressurized Water Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: Legacy drawing, probably from Westinghouse possibly from a reactor SAR in the 70s or 80s�
Page 7: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

7

Pressurized Water Reactor

Pressurized-Water Fuel Assembly

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source:Courtesy Westinghouse Corporation circa 1970s and published in A.G. Croff and C.W. Alexander, “Decay Characteristics of Once-Through LWR and LMFBR Spent Fuels, High-Level Wastes, and Fuel-Assembly Structural Material Wastes,” ORNL/TM-7431 (November 1980).�
Page 8: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

8

Boiling Water Reactor (BWR)•

Dimensions: square, H=4.5m, 14 cm x 14 cm

Weight: 180 kgU, 210 kg UO2

, 110 kg hardware–

Hardware mostly Zircaloy

(Zr

with Sn, Fe, Cr)

Grid spacers: Zircaloy–

Channel (aka

shroud): Zircaloy

End pieces: Stainless steel•

Fuel element array: 8 x 8

Fuel element size: 1.25 cm OD, H=4.1m•

Enrichment: 2.5-4.5%

May have Gd

in some rods and variable enrichment in 3-D

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: A.G. Croff et al, “Revised Uranium-Plutonium Cycle PWR and BWR Models for the ORIGEN Computer Code,” ORNL/TM-6051 (September 1978).�
Page 9: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

9

Boiling Water Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: General Electric advertising brochure dating to the 1970s�
Page 10: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

10

PWR and BWR Fuel Variants•

Advanced Cladding–

Zirlo

(Zr-Nb

alloy) and Duplex (layered) for PWRs

Tweak Zircaloy

composition for BWRs•

Moving to more smaller elements

Mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel–

U-

5-8% Pu

Already being done in US (weapons Pu) and elsewhere–

Mixed actinides from advanced reprocessing

U-Np-Pu: modest extension of U-Pu

fuel technology•

Am-Cm: a challenge, probably requires targets

More PWR fuel gradation and burnable poisons•

Thorium oxide fuel

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source:Various web sites, briefings, review meetings�
Page 11: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

11

Fast Breeder Reactor•

Dimensions: hexagonal, H=4-5.5m, W (flats)= 10-20 cm; HM height ~2m

Weight: ~60 kgHM, ~65 kg MOX, ~135 kg hardware (core plus axial blanket)–

Hardware: Stainless steel

Mostly wire wrap for pin spacing•

Fuel element array: 200-300 pins

Fuel element size: 0.6-0.9 cm OD, H= 4-5m•

Enrichment: 15-30% Pu

Blanket: All depleted UO2–

Fewer, larger diameter elements

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources: IAEA Fast Reactor Data Base at http://www.iaea.org/inisnkm/nkm/aws/frdb/index.html A.G. Croff and M.A. Bjerke, “An ORIGEN2 Model and Results for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor,” NUREG/CR-2762 (ORNL-5884) (July 1982)�
Page 12: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

12

Fast Reactor Fuel Assembly

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source:Graphic from ORNL dating to the 1970s�
Page 13: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

13

Fast Reactor Fuel Variants•

Designs not settled: considerable variation in number of elements, dimensions, and weights possible

Reduce breeding/conversion ratio to achieve net destruction of transuranics–

Eliminate fertile blankets in favor of non-fertile neutron reflectors (e.g., stainless steel)

Inert matrix (e.g., ZrO2

) fuel•

Carbide, nitride, or metal fuel instead of oxide

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources IAEA, “Status and Advances in MOX Fuel Technology,” Technical Report Series (TRS) No. 415 (May 2003) IAEA Fast Reactor Data Base at http://www.iaea.org/inisnkm/nkm/aws/frdb/index.html�
Page 14: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

Metal-Clad Fuel Fabrication

Page 15: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

15

UO2 Fuel Fabrication

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: Seminar titled “AREVA's Fuel business and its strategic and financial significance”given by Claude Jaouen at “AREVA Technical Days” (December 15-16, 2003) available at http://www.areva.com/servlet/BlobProvider?blobcol=urluploadedfile&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=Downloads&blobwhere=1073577265770&filename=Combust_vA2.pdf�
Page 16: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

16

UO2 Fuel Fabrication

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: Seminar titled “AREVA's Fuel business and its strategic and financial significance”given by Claude Jaouen at “AREVA Technical Days” (December 15-16, 2003) available at http://www.areva.com/servlet/BlobProvider?blobcol=urluploadedfile&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=Downloads&blobwhere=1073577265770&filename=Combust_vA2.pdf �
Page 17: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

17

UO2 Fuel Fabrication

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: Seminar titled “AREVA's Fuel business and its strategic and financial significance”given by Claude Jaouen at “AREVA Technical Days” (December 15-16, 2003) available at http://www.areva.com/servlet/BlobProvider?blobcol=urluploadedfile&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=Downloads&blobwhere=1073577265770&filename=Combust_vA2.pdf �
Page 18: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

18

UO2 Fuel Fabrication

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: Seminar titled “AREVA's Fuel business and its strategic and financial significance”given by Claude Jaouen at “AREVA Technical Days” (December 15-16, 2003) available at http://www.areva.com/servlet/BlobProvider?blobcol=urluploadedfile&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=Downloads&blobwhere=1073577265770&filename=Combust_vA2.pdf �
Page 19: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

19

UO2 Fuel Fabrication

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: Seminar titled “AREVA's Fuel business and its strategic and financial significance”given by Claude Jaouen at “AREVA Technical Days” (December 15-16, 2003) available at http://www.areva.com/servlet/BlobProvider?blobcol=urluploadedfile&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=Downloads&blobwhere=1073577265770&filename=Combust_vA2.pdf �
Page 20: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

20

MOX Fuel Fabrication•

The same as UO2

fuel manufacture however….–

Need to make sure the oxides are very homogenous and have required proportions

MOX fuel fabrication from powder usually dilutes a high- concentration “master blend” to the proper Pu

enrichment

Mixed-oxide (MOX): mixtures of actinide oxides–

Conventionally, U-Pu

Advanced: U-Pu-Np, Am-Cm, combinations•

Conventional MOX fuels are being tested in the US but are currently being produced elsewhere–

Facility using weapons Pu

is being built at SRS

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources IAEA, “Status and Advances in MOX Fuel Technology,” Technical Report Series (TRS) No. 415 (May 2003) �
Page 21: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

21

MOX Fuel Fabrication

Steam Heating

Precipitation

Filtering

Drying

Calcining

Milling

Reducing

Fluidized Bed Reacting

Dry Blending

Milling

Calcining

Filtering

Coprecipitation

Dissolution in HNO3

UF6

UO2

Powder

Steam + HF

U Compound

MOX Powder

MOX Powder

NH3OH

H2 + Heat

UO2

or MOX Powder

UO2 PuO2

or

Pu

Compound

NH3

Continue as with UO2

Fuel

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: After J.E. Ayer et al, “Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facility Accident Analysis Handbook,” NUREG-1320 (May 1988) �
Page 22: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

22

Sol-Gel/Sphere-Pac Fabrication•

Used to prepare oxide fuels (U and MOX) without mixing powders, grinding, and dust

Involves two steps:–

Gelation: form kernels of U, Pu, and/or Th

oxides

by forming spheres•

Based on ammonia precipitation of hydrated heavy metal oxides

30, 300, and 1200µm optimal for Sphere-Pac (85% T.D.)•

External gelation

seems to be the current preference

Spheres are then washed and dried at ~200C–

Sphere-Pac: Calcine

and then sinter the spheres

and load them into clad tubes

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources N.Kitamura et al, “PRESENT STATUS OF INITIAL CORE FUEL FABRICATION FOR THE HTTR,” High temperature gas cooled reactor technology development, Proceedings of a Technical Committee meeting held in Johannesburg, South Africa, IAEA-TECDOC-988 (13-15 November 1996) Y.W. Lee, “Development of HTGR Coated Particle Fuel Technology in Korea,” 3rdInternational Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Johannasburg, South Africa (October 2006). F. Charollais et al, “Latest Achievements of CEA & AREVA NP on HTR Fuel Fabrication,” 3rdInternational Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Johannasburg, South Africa (October 2006). R.E. Lerch and R.E. Norman, “Nuclear Fuel Conversion and Fabrication Chemistry,” Radiochimica Acta 36, 75-88 (1984). �
Page 23: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

23

Sol-Gel/Sphere-Pac FabricationExternal Gelation Internal Gelation Sphere-Pac

Acidic U/Pu/ThNitrate Feed

Mix to form broth

GellingAgent

Form GelSpheres

Drying~200 C

Washing & Aging

Drying~200 C

AqueousAmmonia

Donor

GellingAgent

Mix to form broth

VolatileOrganic &

Ammonium Hydroxide

AqueousAmmonia

Donor

Washing & Aging

Ammonium Hydroxide

Form GelSpheres

Dry Gel Sphere

Calcination/Reduction

~450 C

Argon/4% H2

Sintering~1500 C H2

Fuel Element Loading

60% 1200 µm20% 300 µm20% 30 µm

Complete Standard Metal-Clad Fuel

Element Fabrication

U/Pu/ThOxide

Kernels

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources N.Kitamura et al, “PRESENT STATUS OF INITIAL CORE FUEL FABRICATION FOR THE HTTR,” High temperature gas cooled reactor technology development, Proceedings of a Technical Committee meeting held in Johannesburg, South Africa, IAEA-TECDOC-988 (13-15 November 1996) Y.W. Lee, “Development of HTGR Coated Particle Fuel Technology in Korea,” 3rdInternational Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Johannasburg, South Africa (October 2006). F. Charollais et al, “Latest Achievements of CEA & AREVA NP on HTR Fuel Fabrication,” 3rdInternational Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Johannasburg, South Africa (October 2006). R.E. Lerch and R.E. Norman, “Nuclear Fuel Conversion and Fabrication Chemistry,” Radiochimica Acta 36, 75-88 (1984).�
Page 24: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

24

Metal Fuel Fabrication•

Begin with a furnace containing a molten mixture of actinides, some fission products, and alloying constituents

Make a mold having an array of quartz tubes•

Insert mold in furnace, seal, and evacuate

Lower mold into melt and increase pressure to force metal melt into tubes

Raise mold, cool, break to yield metal fuel “pellets” ~0.5m long.

Insert in metal clad as with oxide fuels

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources N.Kitamura et al, “PRESENT STATUS OF INITIAL CORE FUEL FABRICATION FOR THE HTTR,” High temperature gas cooled reactor technology development, Proceedings of a Technical Committee meeting held in Johannesburg, South Africa, IAEA-TECDOC-988 (13-15 November 1996) Y.W. Lee, “Development of HTGR Coated Particle Fuel Technology in Korea,” 3rdInternational Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Johannasburg, South Africa (October 2006). F. Charollais et al, “Latest Achievements of CEA & AREVA NP on HTR Fuel Fabrication,” 3rdInternational Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Johannasburg, South Africa (October 2006). R.E. Lerch and R.E. Norman, “Nuclear Fuel Conversion and Fabrication Chemistry,” Radiochimica Acta 36, 75-88 (1984). �
Page 25: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

25

Metal Fuel Fabrication

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources: B.A. Hilton et al, “Metallic Fuels for Actinide Transmutation,” unpublished presentation at the: 9th OECD/NEA Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation Nîmes, France (September 25-29, 2006) found on the web [all except lower right] K. Pasamehmetoglu et al, The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership: Transmutation Fuels Campaign: FY’08 Accomplishments and FY’09 Plans, GNEP Annual Meeting, Idaho Falls, Idaho (October 8, 2008) [Lower right]�
Page 26: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

26

Fabrication Scrap Recycle

All fabrication processes internally recycle off- specification fuel

Essentially dissolution and U/Pu/MOX purification steps used in a reprocessing plant

Off-spec metal fuels simply go back into the melt furnace or electrorefiner

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources IAEA, “Status and Advances in MOX Fuel Technology,” Technical Report Series (TRS) No. 415 (May 2003)�
Page 27: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

Graphite-Based Fuels

Page 28: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

28

HTGR Prismatic Fuel•

Dimensions: hexagonal, H=0.8m, 0.36m (flats)

Weight: 5-7 kgU, 5.5-7.5 kg UO2–

Hardware 126 kg C (mostly graphite), 4 kg SiC

~1000 blocks for 600 MW(t) reactor•

Fuel element array: 210 on a triangular pitch–

108 Coolant channels

Fuel element size: 1.3 cm OD, H=0.8m–

Contains 14-15 “compacts” with 350-500µm TRISO particles

Enrichment: 8-20%•

May have separate B4

C burnable poison rods

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources “Characteristics of Potential Repository Wastes,” DOE/RW-0184-R1, vol 2 (July 1992) J.W. Sterbentz, “Reactor Physics Parametric and Depletion Studies in Support of TRISO Particle Fuel Specification for the Next Generation Nuclear Plant,” INEEL/EXT-04-02331, (Sept 2004) G.D. Del Cul et al, “TRISO-Coated Fuel Processing to Support High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors,” ORNL/TM-2002/156 (Sept 2002)�
Page 29: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

29

HTGR Prismatic Fuel

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source U.S. Department of Energy, “Draft Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement,” DOE/EIS-0396, Fig. A.4.1.4-1 (October 2008)�
Page 30: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

30

HTGR Prismatic Fuel

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source “Characteristics of Potential Repository Wastes,” DOE/RW-0184-R1, vol 2 (July 1992)�
Page 31: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

31

Pebble Bed Reactor Fuel•

Dimensions: Spherical, D= 6.0 cm

Weight: 9 g U, 10 g UO2–

“Hardware” 194 g C (mostly graphite), ~6 g SiC

~360,000 pebbles for 400 MW(t) reactor•

Fuel element array: random pile

Fuel element size: –

900µm TRISO particle

~15,000 particles per pebble•

Enrichment: 7-10%

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources: IAEA, “Current Status and Future Development of Modular High-Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Technology,” IAEA-TECDOC-1198 (Feb 2001) PMBR Web Site at https://www.pbmr.co.za/�
Page 32: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

32

Pebble Bed Reactor Fuel

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source PMBR Web Site gallery at https://www.pbmr.co.za/ [most of diagram] C. Tang, “Irradiation Testing of Matrix Material for Spherical HTR-10 Fuel Elements,” 3rdInternational Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Johannasburg, South Africa (October 2006) [lower left]�
Page 33: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

33

Pebble Bed Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: C.W. Forsberg, “Refueling Options and Considerations for Liquid-Salt- Cooled Very High-Temperature Reactors,” ORNL/TM-2006/92 (June 2006)�
Page 34: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

Graphite Fuel Fabrication

Page 35: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

Graphite Fuel FabricationKernel Coating HTGR Prism Fuel PBMR Pebble Fuel

Coated Kernel(Fuel Particle)

U/Pu/Th

OxideKernels from

Sol-Gel

DepositPorousCarbon

DepositInner

PyrolyticCarbon

Deposit SiC

DepositOuter

PyrolyticCarbon

Ethane/Argon

Propane/Argon

MTS/Hydrogen/

Argon

Propane/Argon

Mix withmatrix former

OvercoatParticles

Graphite Powderand Additives

Mix withmatrix former

Mold cylindricalfuel compact

(low-pressure)Mold spherical

pebble core(low-pressure)

Carbonize at~800 C in N2

Sinter at ~1800 CIn vacuum

Insert 14-15 CompactsIn fuel holes and plug

Mold graphitepebble shell

(high-pressure)

Machine

Carbonize at~800 C in N2

Sinter at ~1800 CIn vacuum

Graphiteblock

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources G.D. Del Cul et al, “TRISO-Coated Fuel Processing to Support High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors,” ORNL/TM-2002/156 (Sept 2002) N.Kitamura et al, “PRESENT STATUS OF INITIAL CORE FUEL FABRICATION FOR THE HTTR,” High temperature gas cooled reactor technology development, Proceedings of a Technical Committee meeting held in Johannesburg, South Africa, IAEA-TECDOC-988 (13-15 November 1996) Y.W. Lee, “Development of HTGR Coated Particle Fuel Technology in Korea,” 3rdInternational Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Johannasburg, South Africa (October 2006). F. Charollais et al, “Latest Achievements of CEA & AREVA NP on HTR Fuel Fabrication,” 3rdInternational Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Johannasburg, South Africa (October 2006). IAEA, “Current Status and Future Development of Modular High-Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Technology,” IAEA-TECDOC-1198 (Feb 2001) C. Tang, “Irradiation Testing of Matrix Material for Spherical HTR-10 Fuel Elements,” 3rdInternational Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Johannasburg, South Africa (October 2006) IAEA, “Fuel Performance and Fission Product Behaviour in Gas-Cooled Reactors,” IAEA-TECDOC-978 (November 1997). �
Page 36: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

Spent Fuel Characteristics

Page 37: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

37

Effects of Neutron Irradiation•

Elemental and isotopic composition changes–

Actinides fission to produce energy

Rule-of-thumb: Fissioning

1% of actinides = 10 GWd/MT•

Fission Products produced in amounts equal to actinides destroyed

Irradiation produces neutron capture products•

Actinides: U-236, Np, Pu, Am, Cm, U-233

Hardware and fuel matrix: Activation products–

Major constituents yield 93Zr, 60Co, etc.–

Important trace contaminants: U (transuranics), Li (3H), N (14C)

Physical changes: fuel swelling/cracking, clad embrittlement, fission gas release to plenum

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: 30 years of experience�
Page 38: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

38

How much burnup?•

PWRs/BWRs–

Now 40-50 GWd/MTHM

Climbing but enrichment challenges

Fast reactors–

Hope for 100+ GWd/MTHM

Graphite-fueled reactors–

Hope for 100+ GWd/MTHM

PWR

BWR

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Sources: U.S. Department of Energy, “Yucca Mountain License Application,” DOE/RW-0573 (June 2008). U.S. Department of Energy, “Draft Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement,” DOE/EIS-0396, Table A.7-1 (October 2008) �
Page 39: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

39

What are the impacts?•

Complex mix of elements to be considered in separations (~entire periodic table)

Greatly increased radioactivity–

Gamma-rays/x-rays

Neutrons: spontaneous fission and (α,n)–

Alpha (helium nucleus)

Beta (electron)•

Impacts–

Penetrating radiation → need radiation shielding

Particles → material damage–

Decay heat → provisions for heat removal

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source:30 years of experience�
Page 40: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

40

Decay Heat, PWR, 33 GWd/MT

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: R.A. Wigeland, “Criteria Derived for Geologic Disposal Concepts,” unpublished presentation at the: 9th OECD/NEA Information Exchange Meeting onActinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation Nîmes, France (September 25-29, 2006) found on the web �
Page 41: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

Backup Slides

Page 42: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

42

Pressurized Water Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/pwrs.html�
Page 43: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

43

Boiling Water Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/bwrs.html�
Page 44: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

44

Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: DOE, “A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” GIF-002-00 (December 2002) C.W. Forsberg et al, “Practical Aspects of Liquid-Salt-Cooled Fast-Neutron Reactors,” presentation at the International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants Seoul, Korea May 15–19, 2005 �
Page 45: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

45

Very-High-Temperature Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: DOE, “A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” GIF-002-00 (December 2002) �
Page 46: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

46

Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: DOE, “A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” GIF-002-00 (December 2002) �
Page 47: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

47

Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: DOE, “A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” GIF-002-00 (December 2002) �
Page 48: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

48

Molten Salt Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: DOE, “A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” GIF-002-00 (December 2002) �
Page 49: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

49

Molten Salt Reactor Fuel

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: D.F. Williams, “Molten Fluoride Technology: Recent Developments and Trends at ORNL,” presentation on lab-directed research project to parties unknown (February 12, 2003) C.W. Forsberg et al, “Practical Aspects of Liquid-Salt-Cooled Fast-Neutron Reactors,” presentation at the International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants Seoul, Korea May 15–19, 2005�
Page 50: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

50

Supercritical-Water-Cooled Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: DOE, “A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” GIF-002-00 (December 2002) �
Page 51: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

51

Pebble-Bed Modular Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: D. Gee, “The Pebble Bed Modular Reactor,” reference Gee (2002) [RM194] in the U.S. Department of Energy, “Draft Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement,” DOE/EIS-0396, published October 2008 (March 16, 2002) �
Page 52: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

52

Canada Deuterium-Uranium Reactor

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: http://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionA.htm�
Page 53: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

53

CANDU Calandria

Schematic

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: http://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionA.htm �
Page 54: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

54

CANDU Calandria

Photo

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: http://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionA.htm �
Page 55: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

55

CANDU Fuel Assembly

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: http://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionA.htm �
Page 56: Reactors and Fuels - CRESP Consortium for Risk Evaluation with

56

CANDU Online Refueling

Presenter�
Presentation Notes�
Source: http://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionA.htm �