Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    1/36

    A PUBLICATION OF

    THE AMERICAN

    ANTI-VIVISECTION

    SOCIETY

    Reaching for the future:

    The Evolution of HumaneScience Education

    F A L L 2 0 0 2

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    2/36

    Editor-In-Chief

    Tina NelsonManaging EditorCrystal SchaefferCopy Editor

    Julie Cooper-Fratrik

    Staff

    Tina Nelson,Executive DirectorMary Beth Armitage,Assistant Directorof Programs & AdministrationJeanne Borden,Administrative AssistantSara Chenoweth,Assistant Director ofDevelopment & Member Services

    Nicole Green,Program CoordinatorKatherine Lewis,Education DirectorCrystal Miller- Spiegel,Outreach DirectorJennifer Peirson-Winterle,MembershipCoordinatorCrystal Schaeffer,CommunicationsCoordinatorJessica Sterner,Ofce AssistantLauren Zaprala,TechnologyCoordinator

    GRAPHIC DESIGN/ILLUSTRATION:

    Copyright 2002 Orbit Integrated

    TheAV Magazine (USPS 002-660) ispublished quarterly under the auspices of

    the American Anti-Vivisection Society,Sue Leary, President. Annual membershipdues: $20.00. Third-class postage paid atLancaster, Pa. Ofce of Publication:

    801 Old York Road #204Jenkintown, PA 19046-1685Telephone: 215-887-0816Fax: 215-887-2088E-mail: [email protected] Site: www.aavs.org

    Articles published in theAV Magazine maybe reproduced with written permissionand with credit given to AAVS. Also, weappreciate receiving pertinent newspaperand magazine clippings, including their

    sources and dates of publication.When sending funds or making bequests,please use our legal title:

    The American Anti-Vivisection Society801 Old York Road #204Jenkintown, PA 19046-1685

    Organized and established in 1883.

    The individual views expressed in theAV Magazine do not necessarily reect thepolicy of the American Anti-VivisectionSociety.

    Printed on recycled paper.

    CONTENTS

    2 ANIMALEARN: ANIMALS, ETHICS, AND EDUCATION IN ACTIONBy Katherine Lewis, AAVS Education Director & Nicole Green, AAVS Programs CoordinatorAs a leader in promoting humane science education, Animalearn, the education division of AAVS, takes an activerole in not only touting non-animal dissection alternatives, but also in taking a hands-on approach by creatingrelationships with both students and educators.

    3 WHAT THE HECK IS A DIGITAL FROG?By Celia Clark, President, Digital Frog International, Inc.A frog in a symbiotic relationship with a mouse? This seemingly odd pairing has given rise to an innovative computerprogram that has educators excited about teaching and students excited about learning.

    4 A MEDICAL SCHOOL PHYSICIAN PROFESSORS CASE AGAINST VIVISECTION IN MEDICAL EDUCATIONBy Lawrence A. Hansen, M.D., University of California San Diego Medical SchoolThe use of animals in medical school education has drastically declined in recent years. Dr. Hansen offers his candidexpert opinion as to why medical students who are trained without animals will become qualied, empatheticphysicians.

    8 COMPASSION AND INTELLECT: THE GOALS

    By Lara Rasmussen, D.V.M., Director, Surgery and Clinical Skills,Western University of Health Sciences, College of Veternary MedicineEducators at Western University are revolutionizing veterinary medical education. Dr. Rasmussen shares herinsights into teaching and inspiring impressionable students to become qualied, caring veterinarians who areinstilled with a respect for and appreciation of their animal patients.

    13 SCIENCE FAIRS: NO FUN FOR ANIMALSBy Crystal Miller-Spiegel, AAVS Outreach DirectorWhile some may think that science fairs bring out the best in young people, the reality is that these events oftenbring out the worst in science, encouraging students to create duplicative projects that can involve painful animalexperiments.

    14 ALTERNATIVES IN THE TEACHING OF BIOLOGY AT THE UNIVERSITY LEVELS:AN ONGOING SUCCESS STORYBy George K. Russell, Professor of Biology, Adelphi UniversityA pioneer in the eld of humane science education, George Russell shares his thoughts on the importance ofinstilling in students a reverence for life in the study of the biological sciences.

    18 HIGH SCHOOL DISSECTION: EVOLUTION BUT NOT YET REVOLUTION

    By Jonathan Balcombe, Ph.D.While there has been some change in the methodology of teaching the biological sciences, there is still much morethat needs to be done before this area of education is revolutionized and humane alternatives to dissection becomethe norm.

    24 MEDIAWATCHBy Mary Armitage, AAVS Assistant Director of Programs & AdministrationThrough the media, AAVS speaks out on behalf of animals used in experimentation, expressing outrage at thetreatment of animals in laboratories and discussing the ethics of utilizing them as research tools.

    27 NEWSNETBy Crystal Schaeffer, AAVS Communications CoordinatorNCAA Scores One for Cows; Purdue Study Exposes GMO Ecological Risks; Virtual Rat Reality; Virtuality Finds Life inthe CAVE; Second Hand Smoke Linked to Feline Lymphoma.

    30 ARDF UPDATEThe Alternatives Research & Development Foundation (ARDF) proudly announces the recipients of its 2002Alternatives Research Grant Program.

    32 MEMBERSHIPThere are a number of new ways to give a donation to your favorite charity. Making tax-deductible contributions toAAVS has never been easier!

    32 TRIBUTESSpecial friends honored and remembered.

    F E A T U R E S

    Volume CX, Number 4 ISSN 0274-7774

    F E A T U R E S

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    3/36

    This site gives teachers and

    professors information on:

    A new way to teach anatomy

    and physiology

    What educators who use alternatives

    have to say

    Alternative lending information

    Where to nd online alternatives

    And much much more!

    For more information on ordering

    alternatives for your classroom, please

    call us at (800)729-2287 or e-mail

    [email protected].

    This site gives students and

    activists information on:

    Animals used in education

    Students rights Other students testimonials

    Alternative lending information

    And much more!

    For more information on ordering

    alternatives for your class or advice

    on implementing a students choice

    policy at your school, please call

    us at (800)729-2287 or e-mail

    [email protected].

    As a teacher looking foralternative projects,

    www.animalearn.org was

    all that I needed. The site

    provided me with information

    as well as a free program to

    try out with my students.

    Jennifer Walker,

    10th grade Biology teacher

    Being a student opposed to

    dissection, I found rescources

    on alternative projects hard tond....www.humanestudent.org

    saved me from having to dissect

    in my class. It also helped other

    students in my class who didnt

    want to dissect animals.

    Kevin

    11th grade

    A student-focused online resource foralternatives to dissection information!

    animals harmed: zero

    www.animalearn.org

    www.humanestudent.org

    A teacher-focused online resource foralternatives to dissection information!

    1-800-729-2287

    [email protected]

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    4/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    5/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    6/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    7/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    8/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    9/36

    Medical school faculty arent

    the only doctors opposed to dog

    vivisection laboratories. Regular

    doctors in private practice alsooppose wasting animals lives

    for repetitive teaching exercises.

    Some local doctors who were

    especially troubled by unnecessary

    vivisection set out to discover

    if their medical peers would

    join them in trying to end the

    University of California San

    Diego (UCSD) dog vivisection

    laboratories.

    These doctors against dog labs

    wrote a petition expressing thesimple sentiment that killing

    dogs is not necessary to teach

    physiology and pharmacology, nor

    is it a necessary step to becoming

    a good doctor. Would surgeons

    and emergency room doctors,

    internists, and pediatricians sign

    this petition? Yes, indeed!

    Many mature physicians

    expressed surprise that such

    archaic labs were still in existence.

    Some medical senior practitionershad been so unimpressed by

    dog labs that now, years later,

    they had to strain to remember

    if theyd even participated.

    Other physicians retold horror

    stories of dogs surfacing from

    inadequate anesthesia midway

    through vivisection. Others

    remembered that their dogs

    died prematurely, just part way

    into the demonstration. Many

    younger physicians, graduates of

    schools that no longer vivisect,were incredulous upon hearing

    the descriptions of dog labs.

    Nearly every doctor who was

    asked, in every specialty, from

    hospitals all over town, readily

    signed the petition. Only a fewa

    very fewdoctors felt the one-

    day teaching labs during the

    rst year of medical school had

    MEDICAL EDUCATION

    about the patient, which requires empa-

    thy. Teaching medical students to sup-

    press their natural empathy for the ani-

    mals they are instructed to vivisect runs

    contrary to the highest motivation stu-

    dents have for entering medicine in the

    rst place, the desire to relieve suffer-

    ing, not to cause it. Physicians, of course,cannot be immobilized by their empa-

    thy: they must develop a capacity for

    objectivity in the midst of emotional-

    ly charged circumstances. Some vivi-

    section proponents go so far as to cele-

    brate the tough-minded obliteration of

    empathy necessary to vivisect a dog you

    would, under other circumstances, play

    with or pet. They equate treating a dog

    as a physiologic preparation with de-

    veloping a capacity for objectivity. But

    this mistakes a vice for a virtue, as de-

    scribed in the Tibetan Buddhist con-cept of the near enemy. All virtues have

    cousin vices, termed near enemies,

    which supercially resemble them but

    are really distinctly different if not op-

    posite in nature. Jealousy looks like

    love but is not, just as apathy resembles

    equanimity but is not. So too, the cal-

    lousness required for vivisection appears

    similar to the scientic virtue of objec-

    tivity but is actually the vice of indiffer-

    ence to the suffering of others.

    It is humbling for a physician to ad-

    mit it, but probably the best deni-

    tion of empathy comes from a lawyer,

    not a doctor. The lawyer was Abraham

    Lincoln. Once, when discussing a fel-

    low politicians lukewarm enthusi-

    asm for outlawing slavery, Lincoln re-

    marked that some men feel the lashpretty well when it is applied to their

    own backs but feel nothing when see-

    ing it applied to the backs of others.

    Empathy is the ability to feel the lash

    applied to anothers back. Students

    capacity for empathy should be en-

    couraged, strengthened, and rein-

    forced by their medical education, not

    destroyed by it.

    Enlightened Buddhist insights

    about the near enemies of virtue and

    Lincolnesque empathy for the suffer-

    ing of others are probably too much toexpect of medical students being told

    to vivisect by their revered professors.

    It is more realistic for physician facul-

    ty members opposed to vivisection to

    hope for the attitude of John Updikes

    Harry (Rabbit) Angstrom. Harry once

    recalled that when he was a boy, he

    sometimes saw other kids amus-

    ing themselves by using a magnify-

    ing lens to burn ants. Harry, although

    hardly a paragon of virtue, never par-

    cipated in this recreation because,

    en as a chi d, he recognized that

    eople were cruel enough without

    orking at it. We hope that medical

    udents, once in ormed that vivisec-

    on is unnecessary in their education,

    ill conclude that it represents anoth-

    r example of people working at cruel-

    and decide, ike Harry, not to work

    it with them.

    r. Hansen is professor of pathology and the

    urosciences at the University of California

    n Diego. He is also the Director of the

    lzheimers Disease Research Center Brainnk.

    e opinions expressed in this article are my own,d should not be interpreted as expressing any of-l positions by the University of California San Diego

    edical School or its Departments of Pathology and theurosciences.

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    10/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    11/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    12/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    13/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    14/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    15/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    16/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    17/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    18/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    19/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    20/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    21/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    22/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    23/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    24/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    25/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    26/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    27/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    28/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    29/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    30/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    31/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    32/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    33/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    34/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    35/36

  • 8/8/2019 Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education

    36/36

    The American Anti-Vivisection Society801 Old York Road #204Jenkintown, PA 19046 -1685

    A Non-Prot Educational OrganizationDedicated to the Abolition of Vivisection

    NONPROFIT ORG.

    U.S. POSTAGE

    P A I DLANCASTER, PA

    PERMIT NO. 53

    I touch the future,

    I teach.Christa McAuliffe