Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Re-Examining the Crisis in Quantum Theory
Part 1: Zeeman Spectroscopy
by David C. Cassidy, Hofstra University, Hempstead (NY)
Max Planck (1858–1947)
Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), pp. 67-68
Because it leads to large-scale paradigm destruction....the emergence of
new theories is generally preceded by a period of pronounced professional
insecurity. As one might expect, that insecurity is generated by the
persistent failure of the puzzles of normal science to come out as they
should.
Paul Forman, “Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory, 1918-
1927”, HSPS (1972), p. 62.
It now seems evident to me that these internal developments were not in
themselves sufficient conditions. The possibility of the crisis of the old
quantum theory was, I think, dependent upon the physicists’ own craving
for crises, arising from participation in, and adaptation to, the Weimar
intellectual milieu.
Gap
Suman Seth, “Crisis and the construction of modern theoretical physics,”
British Journal for History of Science, March 2007, p. 25
• Sommerfeld school: emphasis on solving problems,
“neither saw a crisis nor acknowledged its resolution.”
• Bohr and Copenhagen school: emphasis on finding and
using new principles, “openly advocated a crisis even before decisive
anomalies arose.”
Some historical studies of the quantum crisis
M. Jammer, The conceptual development of quantum mechanics. 1966.
P. Forman, “The doublet riddle and atomic physics circa 1924,” Isis, 1968.
P. Forman. “Alfred Landé and the anomalous Zeeman effect,” HSPS, 1970.
H. Small. The helium atom in the old quantum theory. PhD diss., 1971.
R. Stuewer. The Compton effect: Turning point in physics, 1971.
D. Cassidy. Werner Heisenberg and the crisis in quantum theory, 1920-25.
PhD diss., 1976.
D. Serwer. “Unmechanischer Zwang: Pauli, Heisenberg, and the rejection of
the mechanical atom, 1923-1925.” HSPS, 1977.
J. Hendry. “Bohr-Kramers-Slater: A virtual theory of virtual oscillators.”
Centaurus, 1981.
Gap
O. Darrigol. From c-numbers to q-numbers. 1992. Chapter 8, “A Crisis”
H. Kragh. Quantum generations. 1999. Section: “Quantum anomalies”
Historical Implications of Bohr Atom
• Extraordinarily successful visualizable mechanical model of orbiting
electrons in states obeying classical mechanics but not electrodynamics.
Historical Implications of Bohr Atom
• Extraordinarily successful visualizable mechanical model of orbiting
electrons in states obeying classical mechanics but not electrodynamics.
• Despite the success, many statements appeared over the next decade
on the fundamentally unsatisfactory nature of the theory, starting with Bohr
himself in 1913.
Historical Implications of Bohr Atom
• Extraordinarily successful visualizable mechanical model of orbiting
electrons in states obeying classical mechanics but not electrodynamics.
• Despite the success, many statements appeared over the next decade
on the fundamentally unsatisfactory nature of the theory, starting with Bohr
himself in 1913.
• Yet the Bohr atom (with extensions by Sommerfeld) set the standard for a
successful quantum theory of atomic phenomena for a decade:
“Eine modellmäßige Deutung”--- “a model-based interpretation”--- of atomic
phenomena.
The Onset of the Crisis
• Beginning about 1918, new and more precise data and
mechanical calculations resulted by the early 1920s in an
increasing failure to achieve the ideal set by the Bohr atom
as the standard for normal science.
The Onset of the Crisis
• Beginning about 1918, new and more precise data and
mechanical calculations resulted by the early 1920s in an
increasing failure to achieve the ideal set by the Bohr atom
as the standard for normal science.
• This failure magnified the sense of insecurity about the old
quantum theory within the quantum physics community.
The Onset of the Crisis
• Beginning about 1918, new and more precise data and
mechanical calculations resulted by the early 1920s in an
increasing failure to achieve the ideal set by the Bohr atom
as the standard for normal science.
• This failure magnified the sense of insecurity about the old
quantum theory within the quantum physics community.
• The insecurity reached such proportions by 1923 that it
came close to what Kuhn described as a crisis situation.
At the same time, as Seth suggested, noticeable
differences did appear among different groups.
However….
• The old quantum theory did work quite well for many other
phenomena, such as molecular band spectra.
However….
• The old quantum theory did work quite well for many other
phenomena, such as molecular band spectra.
• Forman thesis and related issues regarding the quantum
crisis require a separate paper.
3 Problems, 3 Groups, 3 Places- Roughly Defined
1. Problem: Multiplet (complex) line spectra of atoms and their
anomalous Zeeman effects.
Research group: Sommerfeld school in Munich, including Tübingen
spectroscopists Paschen and Back with theorist Alfred Landé
3 Problems, 3 Groups, 3 Places- Roughly Defined
1. Problem: Multiplet (complex) line spectra of atoms and their
anomalous Zeeman effects.
Research group: Sommerfeld school in Munich, including Tübingen
spectroscopists Paschen and Back with theorist Alfred Landé
2. Problem: Simple 3-body atomic/molecular systems beyond
hydrogen atom: H2+, normal He, excited He
Research group: Born school in Göttingen, including Pauli and
Heisenberg; also Kramers, Kemble, Van Vleck
Both of these problem areas concerned atomic structure.
3. Problem: Nature of light: Interaction of radiation and matter, including
dispersion theory and the problem of light quanta
Research group: Bohr school in Copenhagen: including Pauli,
Heisenberg, Kramers.
Sommerfeld an Bohr, 4. Sept. 1913Werden Sie Ihr Atommodell auch auf den Zeeman-Effekt anwenden?Ich wollte mich damit beschäftigen.
Sommerfeld & Bohr, ca. 1919
Some important results of Sommerfeld, 1916
• The Sommerfeld quantum conditions, involving only integer
numbers of quanta
• a relativistic treatment of the Kepler orbits of the electrons in the
Bohr model led to angular momentum as a degree of freedom,
and...
• two new quantum numbers for the orbital motion of an electron,
giving 3 altogether.
Sommerfeld’s quantum numbers:
n for orbital state
k for azimuthal angular momentum
m for space quantization, if z axis defined.
0,1,2,..., yielding 21 statesmkk= ± ± ± +
• Sommerfeld intended to define the z-axis by a weak magnetic
field and thus obtain the Zeeman effect, but he did not do so in that
paper.
Normal Zeeman Effect for singlet lines by Sommerfeld and Debye,1916
0022
L
e
mheHEEEmh
mc!
"= + # = + 1,0m! = ±
Gives splitting of a singlet line into 3 lines in weak magnetic field, but ….
• Origin of selection rule unknown
• Could not account for anomalous Zeemaneffect
0E
E Energy of Zeeman term
Energy of unperturbed optical term
L! Larmor frequency
Anomalous Zeeman Effect, about 1920
• Associated with optical multiplet lines: doublets and triplets
• Splitting into more than 3 lines or not at Larmor frequency.
From Sommerfeld, Atombau u. Spektrallinien, 1921
Paschen-Back Effect, 1913
As magnetic field H increases, the anomalous Zeeman effect transforms
continuously into the normal Zeeman effect. Shown below for doublet
sodium D-lines.
From Sommerfeld, Atombau, 1924; my diss.
doublets: j = k, k – 1triplets: j = k, k – 1, k - 2
Today: fine structure owingto spin-orbit coupling
Sommerfeld, “Ein Zahlenmysterium in der Theorie des
Zeemaneffektes”. Naturwissenschaften, 1920.
Der musikalischen Schönheit unserer Zahlentafel wird dadurch kein
Abbruch getan, daß sie einstweilen ein Zahlenmysterium darstellt. In
der Tat sehe ich bisher keinen Weg zur modellmäßigen Erklärung
weder der Dublett-Triplett-Tatsachen noch ihrer magnetischen
Beeinflussung.
Landé, 1921
0 LEEmh != + normal Zeeman effect
iLEEgmh != + anomalous Z.E.
1g =
2
21
jg
k=
!
11/
11/1(1)
11/(1)
k
gkk
k
+! "# #
= $ + $% &# #$ $' (
singlets
doublets
triplets
0,1,2,...,mj= ± ± ±
135 1,,,...,()2222
mj= ± ± ± ± !
triplets, 2j+1 states, odd
doublets, 2j states, even
j = k
j = k - 1
j = k - 2
Sommerfeld to Einstein, Okt. 1921
Es kommt wirklich Licht oder besser gesagt Dämmerung
in die Spektroskopie.
Sommerfeld to Landé, Feb. 1921
Bravo! Sie können hexen! Ihre Construktion der Dublett-
Zeeman-Typen ist sehr schön.
Heisenberg, 1924. Photo by F. Hund.
Sommerfeld, Zs. f. Physik, 8 (1922)
__21
2(*1(2*/*))LEEhmmk! " "= + ± + +
The Sommerfeld-Voigt equation for doublets, 1922
E is the energy of the Zeeman term
__
E is the average of the doublet energies
1
LH
!"
!
#= $ k* = k – ½, j* = j – ½
*1/2,3/2,...,*mk= ± ± ±
Landé’s g-factors obtained from dominant terms in an
expansion of square root as ! "#
**mj !
Vector addition in Heisenberg’s core model, 1921
1122
1122
()
()1
jkk
jkk
= ! + =
= ! ! = !
Sommerfeld to Einstein, 11 January 1922
Ein Schüler von mir (Heisenberg, 3. Semester!) hat diese Gesetze
u. die der anomalen Zeemaneffekte sogar modellmässig gedeutet
(Z. f. Ph., im Druck). Alles klappt, bleibt aber doch im tiefsten Grunde unklar.
Ich kann nur die Technik der Quanten fördern, Sie müssen
Ihre Philosophie machen. .....Setzen Sie ihr nur ordentlich zu!
1. Born and Heisenberg in Göttingen–a rigorous and systematic
application of Hamilton-Jacobi mechanics to quantum models of
the excited helium atom in order to determine if Bohr-Sommerfeld
theory worked or not.
Two research programs spawned by the Bohr Festival
2. Bohr and Pauli in Copenhagen–“a desperate attempt to
remain true to the integer quantum numbers, in which we
hoped to see even in the paradoxes a hint for the way in
which we might seek the solution of the anomalous Zeeman
effect.”
Bohr to Landé, 3 March 1923
Es war…ein Verzweiflungsversuch, den ganzen Quantenzahlen treu
zu bleiben, indem wir hofften, eben in den Paradoxien einen
Fingerzeig zu sehen für die Wege, auf denen man die Lösung des
anomalen Zeemaneffektes suchen dürfte.”
Pauli an Bohr, 21 Feb. 1924
Ich selbst kann an dieser Sorte von theoretischer Physik
keinerlei Geschmack gewinnen und ziehe mich von ihr zu
meiner Wärmeleitung im festen Körper zurück.
Born, Naturwissenschaften, Bohr-Heft, July 1923
Es wird immer wahrscheinlicher, daß nicht nur neue Annahmen
im gewöhnlichen Sinne physikalischer Hypothesen erforderlich
sein werden, sondern daß das ganze System der Begriffe der Physik
von Grund aus umgebaut werden muß.
Thank you!
Einstein and Bohr, late 1920s