Rayo vs Cfi Bulacan

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Rayo vs Cfi Bulacan

    1/1

    RAYO vs. CFI BULACAN

    Facts:

    During the height of typhoon Kading, the respondent corporation acting through itsplant superintendent, Benjamin Chavez, opened simultaneously all the three

    floodgates of the Angat Dam. As a direct and immediate result, several towns in

    Bulacan where inundated and the hardest hit was Norzagaray. About a hundred of

    its residents died and properties worth million of pesos were destroyed. The

    petitioners, who were among the many unfortunate victims of the man-caused flood,

    filed eleven complaints for damages against the National Power Corporation and the

    plant superintendent of Angat Dam. The respondent corporation filed separate

    answers to each of those eleven complaints and invoking in each answer a special

    and affirmative defense that in the operation of the Angat Dam, it is performing a

    purely governmental function, and it cannot be sued without the express consent of

    the State. The petitioners opposed the prayer of the respondent for dismissal of thecase and contended that the respondent corporation is performing not

    governmental but proprietary functions and that under its own organic act, it can

    sue and be sued in court.

    Issue:

    Whether respondent National Power Corporation performs a governmental

    function with respect to the management and operation of the Angat Dam; and

    Whether the power of respondent National Power Corporation to sue and be sued

    under its organic charter includes the power to be sued for tort.

    Held:

    The Government has organized a private corporation, put money in it and has

    allowed it to sue and be sued in any court under its charter. The National Power

    Corporation, a government owned and controlled corporation, has a personality of

    its own, distinct and separate from that of the government. The charter provision

    that the National Power Corporation can sue and be sued in any court is without

    qualification on the cause of action and can include a tort claim. The petition is

    granted.

    Notes:

    Government Owned and Controlled Corporations (GOCC) have a personality of their

    own, separate and distinct from the government, their funds, therefore although

    considered to be public in character, are not exempt from garnishment.