Rapid Prototyping and Rapid Tooling

7/28/2019 Rapid Prototyping and Rapid Tooling

1/24

http://pic.sagepub.com/ Engi neering Sci ence

Engineers, Part C: Journal of MechanicalProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical

http://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1The online version of this article can be foun d at:

DOI: 10.1243/0954406037625545691

2003 217eedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science D T Pham and S S Dimov

the key enablers for rapid manufacturingRapid prototyping and rapid tooling

Published by:

http://www.sagepublications.com

On behalf of:

Institution of Mechanical Engineers

can be found at:Engineering Science Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Additional services and information for

http://pic.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsEmail Alerts:

http://pic.sagepub.com/subscriptionsSubscriptions:

http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navReprints:

http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navPermissions:

http://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1.refs.htmlCitations:

What is This?

- Jan 1, 2003Version of Record>>

at Cardiff University on April 4, 2012pic.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://pic.sagepub.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1http://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1http://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1http://www.sagepublications.com/http://www.sagepublications.com/http://www.imeche.org/homehttp://www.imeche.org/homehttp://pic.sagepub.com/cgi/alertshttp://pic.sagepub.com/cgi/alertshttp://pic.sagepub.com/subscriptionshttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navhttp://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1.refs.htmlhttp://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1.refs.htmlhttp://online.sagepub.com/site/sphelp/vorhelp.xhtmlhttp://online.sagepub.com/site/sphelp/vorhelp.xhtmlhttp://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1.full.pdfhttp://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1.full.pdfhttp://pic.sagepub.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/http://online.sagepub.com/site/sphelp/vorhelp.xhtmlhttp://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1.full.pdfhttp://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1.refs.htmlhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navhttp://pic.sagepub.com/subscriptionshttp://pic.sagepub.com/cgi/alertshttp://www.imeche.org/homehttp://www.sagepublications.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/content/217/1/1http://pic.sagepub.com/


2/24

SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER

Rapid prototyping and rapid toolingthe key enablersfor rapid manufacturing

D T Pham * and S S DimovManufacturing Engineering Centre, School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Wales, UK

Abstract: Rapid manufacturing is a new mode of operation that can greatly improve the competitiveposition of companies adopting it. The key enabling t echnologies of rapid manufacturing are rapidprototyping (RP) and rapid tooling (RT). This paper classi es the existing RP processes and brie ydescribes those with actual or potential commercial impact. The paper then discusses ve importantRP applications: building functional prototypes, producing casting patterns, making medical andsurgical models, creating artworks and fabricating models to assist engineering analysis. Finally, thepaper gives an overview of indirect and direct R T methods for quickly producing u p to several

thousand parts together with examples illustrating different applications of RT.

Keywords: rapid prot otyping, rapid tooling, rapid manufacturing

1 INTRODUCTION

Global competition, mass customization, acceleratedproduct obsolescence and continued demands for costsavings are forcing companies to look for new ways to

improve their business processes. Ra pid prototyping(RP) and rapid tooling (RT) have emerged as keyenablers for rapid manufacturing, a new mode of operation promising improvements to the competitiveposition of companies adopting it.

RP is a technology for quickly fabricating physicalmodels, functional prot otypes and small batches of partsdirectly from computer aided design (CAD) data. RTgenerally concerns the pro duction of m oulds and toolinginserts using RP. RP and RT are means for compressingthe t ime-to-market of products and, as such, arecompetitiveness-enhancing technologies.

This paper starts with a classi cation of existing RPprocesses and a brief description of those currently witha signi cant commercial impact or expected t o be insuch a position in the near future. Five differentapplication areas of RP are discussed, in particular:building functional prototypes, patterns for castings,medical and surgical models, artworks and models forengineering analysis. The paper then reviews indirect

and direct RT methods that are, or shortly will be,available for production runs of up to several thousandparts in a material identical or very similar to that of the

nal production part. Three examples illustratingdifferent applications of RT conclude the paper.

2 RAPID PROTOTYPING

RP processes may be divided broadly into thoseinvolving the addition or the removal of material.According to Kruth [ 1], material accretion processesmay be categorized by the sta te of the prototypematerial before part formation, namely liquid, powderor solid sheets. Liquid-based processes may entail thesolidi cation of a resin on contact with a laser, thesolidi cation of an electrosetting uid or the melting and

subsequent solidi cation of the prototype material.Processes using powders (discrete pa rticles) aggregatethem either with a laser or by the selective application of binding agents. Those p rocesses that employ solid sheetsmay be classi ed into two types depending on whetherthe sheets are bonded with light or with an adhesive.

Material accretion processes may also be clusteredaccording to the mechanism employed for transferringdata from the sliced three-dimensional models intophysical structures. Following this method of categor-ization, the processes fall into one of four groups:

1. One-dimensional channel . The rst group of processestransfers data using one-dimensional channels. T hese

The M S was received on 19 February 2002 and was accepted after revision for publication on 25 July 2002.* Corresponding author: M anufacturing Engineering Centre, S chool of Engin eering, Cardif f University , PO Box 925, Newport Road, Cardif f CF24 OYF, UK.

1

C02402 # IMechE 2003 Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs Vol. 217 Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science at Cardiff University on April 4, 2012pic.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://pic.sagepub.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/


3/24

data channels may be realized in the form of a laserbeam, an extrusion head, a jet of thermoplastic, anozzle spraying a binder, a welding head, a cutter ora computerized knife.

2. M ultiple one-dimensional channels . A process in thiscategory would employ multiple one-dimensionalchannels working in parallel. Currently, there is

only one process implementing this data transfermethod with two independently controlled lasers.However, this multichannel approach could beadopted for other processes in the rst group tomultiply productivity without introducing anychanges to the fundamental working principles.

3. A rray of one-dimensional channels . The third groupincludes processes that utilize arra ys of one-dimen-sional channels to construct three-dimensional struc-tures. These may be arrays of nozzles or jets.Currently, RP systems with the highest build speedsall use this mechanism for data transfer.

4. Two-dimensional channel . The fourth group includesprocesses employing two-dimensional channels, e.g.

masks. At present, there are only a few processesusing this mechanism although it offers signi cantproductivity advantages over the other threeapproaches.

Figure 1 shows a classi cation of RP processes thattakes into account both the state of materials before partformation and the mechanism employed for data

transfer. In the following section, material a ccretionprocesses are presented according to the build materialused.

2.1 Material accretion processes

2.1.1 L iquid polymer

Of the six processes in this category, which all involvethe solidi cation of a resin by applying electromagneticradiation, two construct the part using points to buildup the layers while the other four solidify entire layers orsurfaces at once:

Fig. 1 Classi cation o f rapid prot otyping processes

D T PHAM AND S S DIMOV2

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs Vol. 217 Part C: J. Mechanical Engineerin g Science C02402 # IMechE 2003 at Cardiff University on April 4, 2012pic.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://pic.sagepub.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/http://pic.sagepub.com/


4/24

1. Stereolithography ( SL ) . This process relies on aphotosensitive liquid resin which forms a solidpolymer when exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light. SLsystems consist of a build platform (substrate) whichis mounted in a vat of resin and a UV heliumcadmium or argon ion laser [ 2]. The rst layer of thepart is imaged on the resin surface by the laser using

information obtained from the three-dimensionalsolid CAD model. Once the contour of the layerhas been scanned and the interior hatched, theplatform is lowered and a new layer of resin isapplied. The next layer may then be scanned. Oncethe part is completed, it is removed from the vat andthe excess resin drained. The green part is thenplaced in a UV oven to be post-cured. To broadenthe application area of SL, research and technologydevelopment efforts have been directed towardsprocess optimization [ 3, 4].

2. L iquid thermal polymerization ( LT P) . This process issimilar to SL except that the resin is thermosettingand an infrared laser is used to create voxels (three-dimensional pixels). This means that the size of thevoxels may be affected through heat dissipation,which can also cause unwanted distortion andshrinkage in the part [ 1]. The system is still beingresearched.

3. Holographic interference solidi cation ( HIS ) . Aholographic image is projected into the resin, causingan entire surface to solidify. Data are still obtainedfrom the CAD model, although not as slices [ 1].There are no commercial systems available yet.

4. Solid ground curing ( SGC) . This system again utilizesphotopolymerizing resins and UV light [ 5]. Datafrom the CAD model are used to produce electro-statically a mask on a glass that is developed using atoner. Then the mask is placed above the resinsurface and the entire layer is illuminated with apowerful UV lamp. Once the layer has been cured,the excess resin is wiped away and any spaces are

lled with wax. The wax is cooled with a chill plate,milled at a nd t he wax chips removed. A new layer of resin is applied and the process is repeated.

5. Rapid micro product development ( RM PD) . TheRM PD process is a mask-based technology verysimilar to that of photolithography as used inmicroelectronics manufacture [ 6]. CAD data a reemployed to produce masks for laser polymerizationof a liquid photoresin in a layer-by-layer fashion. Theprocess allows micro components to be built with aminimum layer t hickness of 1 mm and X Y resolutionof 10 mm. In addition, this process can be used tocreate complex micro systems that integrate electro-nics, optical and mechanical components.

6. Objet Quadra process . The process employs 1536nozzles to bui ld par ts by spreading layers of photosensitive resin that are then cured, layer bylayer, using two UV lights. The intensity of the lights

and the exposure are controlled so that modelsproduced by the system do not require post-curing.To support overhanging areas and undercuts, Objetdeposits a second material that can be separatedeasily from the model [ 7].

2.1.2 M olten material

There are six processes that involve the melting andsubsequent solidi cation of the part material. Of these,the rst ve deposit the material at discrete points whilethe sixth manufactures whole layers at once:

1. Ballistic particle manufacture ( BPM ) . The processbuilds parts by ejecting a stream of molten materialfrom a nozzle. The stream separates into dropletsthat hit the substrate and immediately cold-weld toform the part [ 8]. Commercial systems based on thisprocess were available unt il 1998.

2. M ulti jet modelling ( M JM ) . The process buildsmodels using a technique similar to inkjet or phase-change printing but applied in three dimensions [ 9]. Aprint head comprising 352 jets forming a lineararray builds models in successive layers, eachindividual jet depositing a specially developed th er-mopolymer material only where necessary (Fig. 2).The MJM head shuttles back and forth along the X axis like a line printer. If the part is wider than theMJM head, the platform repositions itself ( Y axis) tocont inue building the layer. When a layer iscompleted, the platform is moved away from thehead ( Z axis) which begins to create the next layer. Atthe end of the build, support structures are brushedoff to nish the model.

3. Fused deposition modelling ( FDM ) . FDM systemsconsist of two movable heads (one for building thepart and one for t he supports) which deposit threadsof molten material onto a substrate. The material isheated just above its melting point so that it solidi es

Fig. 2 Multi jet modelling head

RP AND RTTHE K EY ENABLERS FOR RAPID MANUFACTURING 3



5/24

immediately after extrusion and cold-welds to theprevious layers [ 10 ].

4. T hree-dimensionalwelding ( 3DW ) . T his experimentalsystem uses an arc-welding robot to deposit materialon a platform as simple shapes which may then bebuilt into more complex structures [ 11 ]. Unlike mostRP processes, t he prot otypes are built using compu-

ter numerically controlled (CNC ) programs gener-ated directly from th e CAD les instead of employingslice data. Another experimental system deposits theweld material in layers. Feedback control is estab-lished by means of thermocouples which monitor thetemperature and operate an on-line water coolingsystem. A grit-blasting nozzle minimizes t he oxidiza-tion of the part and a suction pump and vacuumnozzle remove excess water vapour and grit [ 12].

5. Precision droplet-based net-form manufacturing( P D M ) . This is a droplet-based net-forming manu-facturing technique [ 13]. The process exploits thecapillary instability phenomenon of liquid jets forproducing uniform liquid metal droplets. The ther-mal s tate and mass ux of the droplets can becontrolled to tailor the microstructure of the deposit.There is no commercial system based on this pro cess.

6. Shape deposition manufacturing ( SDM ) . Still experi-mental, this layer-by-layer process involves sprayingmolten metal in a near-net shape on to a substrateand then removing unwanted material via numeri-cally controlled (NC) operations [ 14]. Supportmaterial is added in the same way either before orafter the prototype material, depending on whetherthe layer contains undercut features (Fig. 3). Theadded material bo lsters subsequent layers. If the layeris complex, support material may need to be addedboth before and after the prototype material. Each

layer is then shot-peened to remove residual stresses.The prototype is transferred from station to stationusing a robotized pallet system. To date, stainlesssteel parts supported with copper have been pro-duced . The copper may then be removed byimmersion in nitric acid. These prototypes have thesame st ructure as cast or welded par ts and the

accuracy of NC milled components.

2.1.3 Processes involving discrete particles

These processes build the part by joining powder grainstogether using either a laser or a separate bindingmaterial. The main processes in this category aredescribed brie y below:

1. Selective laser sintering ( SL S) . SL S u ses a n epowder which is heated with a CO 2 laser so thatthe surface tension of the particles is overcome andthey fuse together. Before the powder is sintered, theentire bed is heated to just below the melting point of the mat erial in order t o minimize thermal distortionand facilitate fusion to the previous layer [ 15]. Thelaser is modulated such that only those grains thatare in direct contact with the beam are affected. Alayer is drawn on the powder bed using the laser tosinter the material. The bed is then lowered and thepowder-feed cartridge raised so that a covering of powder can be spread evenly over the build area by acounter-rotating roller. The sintered material formsthe pa rt while the unsintered powder remains in p laceto support the structure and may be cleaned awayand recycled once the build is complete (F ig. 4).There is another process, laser sintering technology

Fig. 3 Shape deposition manufacturing. The construction of the rst three layers of a part is shown [ 14 ]




6/24

( L S T ) , that employs the same physical principles.F igure 5 shows an LST system equipped with twolaser beams working in pa rallel. Current ly such dual-laser systems are available for processing t hermo-plastics and sand. Signi cant development effortshave been directed towards process optimization[2, 1518 ] to widen the range of applications of SLSand LST.

2. L aser engineering net shaping ( L EN S TM

) . The LENSprocess involves feeding powder t hrough a nozzle onto the part bed while simultaneously fusing it with alaser (Fig. 6) [ 19]. The powder nozzle may be on one

side of the bed or coaxialwith the laser beam. If it ist o aside, a constant orientation to the part creationdirection must be maintained to prevent solidi edsections from shadowing areas to be built. When thepowder feeder is coaxial, there may be inaccuracies inthe geometry of the part and the layer thickness if thebeam and the powder feeder move out of alignment.Because the stream of powder is heated by the laser,fusion to the previouslayer isfacilitated. Other systemshave also been developed based on the same principle,in particular direct metal deposition ( DM D) [20 ] and A eroM et laser addit ive manuf acturing [21].

Fig. 4 Selective laser sintering

Fig. 5 A dual laser LST system. (Courtesy of E OS G mbH)




7/24

3. Gas phase deposition ( GPD) . In this process, themolecules of a reactive gas are decomposed using alaser to generate a solid [ 2]. The resulting solid thenadheres to the substrate to form the part. Threeslightly different methods of constructing the parthave been investigated. With the rst method,selective area laser deposition ( SA LD) , the solidcomponent of the decomposed gas is all that is usedto form the part. It is possible to construct partsmade from carbon, silicon, carbides and siliconnitrides in this way. The second method, laser-assisted chemical vapour deposition ( LCVD) ,spreads a thin covering of powder for each layerand the decomposed solids ll in the spaces betweenthe grains. With the third method, selective laser reactive sintering ( SLR S) , the laser init ia tes areaction between the gas and the layer of powderto form a solid part of silicon carbide or siliconnitride. There are no commercial GPD systemsavailable yet.

4. Direct photo shaping ( DPS ) . The process employs adigital micromirror device (DMD

TM

) array [ 22 ] as amask to photocure selectively layer-by-layer poly-merizable compositions. The DM D array integratesmore than 500000 microscopic mirrors that can beelectronically tilted to re ect visible light on to thephotocurable slurry [ 23]. No commercia l DPSsystems are available yet.

5. T hree-dimensional printing ( 3DP) . T he process buildsparts by rst applying layers of powder to a substrateand then selectively joining the particles using abinder sprayed through a nozzle [ 24]. Once the buildis completed, the excess powder, which was support-ing the model, is removed, leaving t he fabricatedpart. Since there is no state change involved in thisprocess, distortion is reduced [ 25].

2.1.4 Solid sheets

There are three different processes that employ foils toform the part, namely:

1. Laminated object manufacturing ( L OM ) . The buildmaterial is applied to the part from a roll and isthen bonded to the previous layers using a hot roller

which activates a heat-sensitive adhesive [ 26]. Thecontour of each layer is cut with a CO 2 laser that iscarefully modulated to penetrate to the exact depthof one layer. Unwanted material is trimmed intorectangles to facilitate its later removal, but remainsin p lace dur ing the build to act a s suppor ts.Separating LOM models from the surroundingexcess material can still be a lengthy and tedioustask. A method that speeds up and simpli es it hasrecently been developed [ 27 ].

2. Paper lamination technology ( PLT ) . The PLTprocess is very similar to LOM. The main differ-

ences between the LOM and PLT processes are inthe material used and the methods employed forcutting the contours of the part cross-sections,wh ich in the ca se of t he PLT pro cess is acomputerized knife. The PLT process prints thecross-section of the part on to a sheet of paper,which is then applied to the work-in-progress a ndbonded using a hot roller [ 28].

3. Solid foil polymerization ( SFP) . The part is built upusing semi-polymerized foils which are soluble inmonomer resin. On exposure to UV light, the foilsolidi es and bonds to the previous layer. It also

becomes insoluble. Once the cross-section has beenilluminated, a new foil can be applied. The areas of foil that do not constitute the eventual part are usedto support it during the build process, but remainso luble and so a re easy to remove [ 1, 29]. Nocommercial systems are available yet.

2.1.5 Electroset uid: electrosetting ( ES)

Electrodes are printed on to a conductive material suchas aluminium. Once a ll the layers have been printed,they are stacked, immersed in a bath of electrosetting

uid and energized. The uid that is between theelectrodes then solidi es to form the part. Once thecomposite has been removed and drained, the unwantedaluminium may be trimmed from the part.

Advantages of this technology are that the partdensity, compressibility, hardness and adhesion maybe controlled by adjusting the voltage and currentapplied to the aluminium. Parts may be made fromsilicon rubber, polyester, polyurethane or epoxy. T hehardware for such a system may be inexpensivelybought off t he shelf [ 12 ].

Fig. 6 LENSTM

process. (Courtesy of Optomec DesignCompany)




8/24

2.2 Material removal processes

This category includes two processes, desktop milling( D M ) an d laser milling (LM) . DM is a process thatremoves material from the workpiece, as in traditionalmachining, instead of creating the part by gradualmaterial build-up [ 30]. Prototypes can be made with ahigh degree of accuracy because they do not deformafter they have been completed.

LM is a new process for fabricating relatively smallprototype components in advanced engineering materi-als such as ceramics, titanium and nickel alloys. Thisprocess removes material as a result of interactionbetween a laser beam and a workpiece. Severalmechanisms exist for material removal, depending onthe laser pulse duration and some material-speci c timeparameters [ 3133]. The laser ablation mechanisms forfemtosecond and picosecond pulses are alike and can beregarded as a direct solidvapour transition (sublima-tion), with negligible thermal conduction into thesubstrate and almost no heat-affected zone (Fig. 7)[33 37]. For nanosecond and longer pulses, theabsorbed energy from the laser pulse melts the materialand heats it to the vaporization temperature (Fig. 8).There is enough time for a thermal wave to propagateinto the material. Evaporation occurs from the liquidmaterial. The molten material is partially ejected fromthe cavity by the vapour and plasma pressure, but a partof it remains near the surface, held by surface tensionforces. After the end of a pulse, the heat quicklydissipates into the bulk of the material and a recast layeris formed.

A numb er of techniques for LM have been developed.They differ from one a nother in the a pplied laser source,the relative beam-workpiece movements and the laserspot characteristics. A common feature of all LMtechniques is that the nal part geometry is created ina layer-by-layer fashion by generating overlapping

craters. Within an individual layer, these simple volumesare arranged in such a manner that each slice has auniform thickness. Through relative movements of thelaser beam and the workpiece, t he microcraters pro-duced by individual laser pulses sequentially covercomplete layers of the part. The LM process is exibleand can be employed in a wide range of applications,from one-off part production to the manufacture of small batches [ 3840].

3 APPLICATIONS OF RAPID PROTOTYPINGTECHNOLOGY

RP models are becoming widely used in many industrialsectors. Initially conceived for design approval and partveri cation, RP now meets the needs of a wide range of applications from building test prototypes with materialproperties close to those of product ion parts tofabricating models for art and medical or surgicaluses. In order to satisfy the speci c requirements of agrowing nu mber of new a pplications, special softwaretools, build techniques and materials have been devel-oped. Five examples in different application areas aredescribed in this section.

Fig. 7 Femto- and picosecond laser ablation




9/24


10/24

CastForm is a polystyrene-based powder that gives alow ash content and is compatible with standardfoundry practices. Processing CastForm creates porouslow-density parts that have to be subsequently in l-trated with a low-ash foundry wax to yield patternscontaining 45 per cent polystyrene and 55 per cent wax.

The heat exchanger assembly of a Pratt and WhitneyPW6000 engine shown in Fig. 10 was produced usingCastForm patterns. The assembly includes three castaluminium components that have to withstand hightemperature and pressure. These complex castings areessentially pressure vessels with multiple portings,mountings and sensor pads. The largest componentmeasures 600mm in height and 325mm in diameter(Fig. 10). Several sets of sacri cial casting patterns werebuilt using the SLS process. The errors in 90 per cent of all functional dimensions were between 0.25 and 0.25mm. The accuracy of the patterns was highlydependent on their size, the largest errors being foundon the largest dimensions. However, although somedimensions were out of the required general tolerances(+ 0.125mm), the aluminium castings were fully satis-factory as any deviations were corrected when some of the features were machine- nished afterwards.

The main bene t of employing the SLS process wasthat the design team was able to incorporate major andminor modi cations into the CAD models between thebuilds. There was no need to freeze the design beforeproceeding to manufacture. The prototype heat exchan-gers underwent stringent testing before the design was

approved. As a relatively small number of exchangerswas required per year, the SLS process was approved asa production method for the fabrication of the requiredcasting patterns. In general, R P patterns are a costeffective alternative when a small number of parts, sayup to 50, of complex design are required and the cost of a mould tool for wax patterns is prohibitive.

3.3 Medical or surgical models

RP technologies are applied in the medical/surgicaldomain for building models that provide visual andtactile information. In particular, RP models can beemployed in the following applications [ 4347 ]:

1. Operation planning . Using real-size R P models of patients p ath ological areas, surgeons can mo re easilyunderstand physical problems and gain a betterinsight into the operations to be performed. RPmodels can also assist surgeons in commun icating th eproposed surgical procedures to patients.

2. Surgery rehearsal . RP models offer unique opportu-nities for surgeons and surgical teams to rehearsecomplex operations using the same techniques andtools as in actual surgery. Potentially, such rehearsalscan lead to changes in surgical procedures andsigni cantly reduce risks.

3. Training . R P mod els of specimens of unusual medicaldeformities can be built to facilitate the training of

Fig. 10 Heat exchanger for a Pratt and Whitney PW6000 engine




11/24

student surgeons and radiologists. Such models canalso be employed for student examinations.

4. Prosthesis design . RP models can be used to fabricatemaster patterns which are then replicated using abiocompatible plastic material. Implants produced inthis way are much more accurate and cost effectivethan those created conventionally.

The following example, reported by a company inQueensland, Australia, demonstrates the use of RPmodels in the medical domain. Two SLA medicalmodels were built for a patient suffer ing from asecondary carcinoma of the right superior orbitalmargin and the adjacent frontal bone. The rst modelwas used t o plan the resection of the cancerous bone a nd

also as an operation reference and patient consent tool.The SLA model can be cut with the same surgical toolsas those used for bone resectioning. A resectionedtemplate was created in plastic following the surgeonsdesired resection line. The fabricated plastic templatewas placed over the model to check the match with thesurgeon s resection line (Fig. 11). T he second mo del wasthen employed to construct an acrylic custom implant(Fig. 12). The unaffected left superior orbital marginwas mirrored across to assist the design of the implant.The resection template and the custom implant wereprepared for the operation by gas sterilization. The

template was then placed on to the lesion and theresection line traced out and the bone cut away. Finally,the implant was inserted into the space vacated by theremoved bone. The operation was reported as acomplete success a nd the surgeon was fully satis edwith the qua lity and the cost of utilizing R P models.

3.4 Art models

Anoth er growing app lication area for R P t echnologies isart and design. Through building RP models, artists canexperiment with complex artworks that support and

enhance their creativity. Initially, the high cost of RPmodels meant strict limits on the size of the models.However, recently, with the introduction of conceptmodellers, which are relatively inexpensive RP machinesfor qu ickly prod ucing design models, it h as become costeffective to employ RP techniques in many artisticapplications. Taking into account the a ccuracy of artmodels and t he R P ma terials available, the technologicalcapabilities of concept modellers are more than ade-quate for the majority of art applications.

The two examples described below demonstrate theuse of RP techniques in art. These were part of work conducted within the CALM (creating art with layermanufacture) project [ 48], which was supported by theHigher Education Funding Council for England as partof an initiative to promote the use of informationtechnology (IT) within the art and design community inUK higher education.

The rst example is an artwork representing a splashspanning the inside of a plexiglass vitrine (Fig. 13). In its

nal installat ion, the RP model (Fig. 14) will beincorporated into a plexibox exactly the width o f thesplash itself.

The second example is a cybersculpture representingan artefact that cannot be created using any conven-tional methods. The initial intentions of the artist wereto produce an RP pattern and then cast it in bronze.Ho wever, after the SLS model (Fig. 15) was built, it wasimmediately recognized that this model, in conjunctionwith the lace-like Moire

surface patterns, satis es theproject requirements [ 48].

3.5 Engineering analysis models

Computer aided engineering (CAE) analysis is anintegral part of time-compression technologies. Varioussoftware tools exist, mainly based on nite elementanalysis (FEA), to speed up the development of newproducts by initiating design optimization before

Fig. 11 The SLA model with the resection template [ 45 ] Fig. 12 The SLA model together with the template and theimplant [ 45]




12/24

physical proto types are a vailable. H owever, the creationof accurate FE A m odels for complex engineering objectssometimes requires signi cant amounts of time andeffort [ 49 51]. By employing RP techniques it is possibleto begin test programmes on physical models muchearlier a nd complement the CAE data. Four applica-t ions of RP models for engineer ing analysis aredescribed below:

1. Visualization of ow patterns . SLA models were usedto optimize the cross- ow jacket of a V6 high-performance racing engine (Fig. 16) [ 50 ]. Sixtysensors were installed in the model to monitor local

ow temperature and pressure conditions. The cool-ant ow patterns were visualized by accuratelyinjecting very small air bubbles. The ow patternswere recorded by high-speed video.

2. Thermoelastic tension analysis ( TH ESA) . Byemploying the THESA method [ 49], RP models of real parts can be used on test rigs for structuralanalysis. This method allows temperature changes in

the test part s to be directly correlated t o the load. T heeffect of a part icular load on the temperaturepatterns is analysed using thermal imaging.

3. Photoelastic stress analysis . Photoelastic testing isemployed to determine the stresses and strains withinphysical part s under speci c conditions. Th is methodis based on the temporary birefringence of atransparent material subjected to a speci c load[50 ]. SLA models exhibit the required birefringencethat can be observed by irradiating the test sampleswith polarized white and monochromatic light.Results from photoelastic analysis of SLA modelscan be transferred to functional metal parts byemploying fundamental similarity laws. It is a lsopossible to freeze the stresses and strains bywarming the loaded model to a level above the resinglass transition temperature and then graduallycooling it back to room t emperature (Fig. 17) [ 50 , 51].

4. Fabrication of models for wind tunnel tests . R Ptechniques can be used to produce wind tunnelmodels, which are not subjected to signi cant loads

Fig. 14 SLS model representing a water splash. (Courtesy of M. Harris and the CALM project [ 48 ])

Fig. 15 SLS model of a cybersculpture. (Courtesy of K.Brown and the CALM project [ 48])

Fig. 13 Cross-sections of the three-dimensional model of a water splash. (Courtesy of M. Harris and theCALM project [ 48 ])




13/24

[52]. For example, the strength, accuracy and surfacenish of models produced using SLA, SLS, FD M

and SGC technologies are suf cient for tests of non-structurally loaded parts. In addition, SLS modelsproduced using steel powder or metal modelsfabricated from RP patterns are adequate for lightlyloaded applications.

4 RAPID TOOLING

As RP becomes more mature, material properties,accuracy, cost and lead-time have improved to permitit to be employed for the production of tools. Some

traditional tool-making methods based on the replica-tion of models have been adapted and new techniquesallowing tools to be fabricated directly by RP have beendeveloped. This section reviews indirect and directmethods for RT that are, or shortly will be, availablefor production runs of up to several thousand parts.

4.1 Indirect methods for rapid tool production

Indirect RT methods are alternatives to traditionalmould-making techniques. These less expensive methodswith shorter lead-times allow tool validation to be

conducted before changes become very costly. The aimof these RT methods is to ll the gap between RP andhard tooling by enabling the production of tools capableof short prototype runs. The broad range of indirect RTsolutions makes it dif cult to determine the mostappropriate method for a particular project. Compa niesneed to know all of the available processes and have aclear understanding of their strengths and weaknessestogether with the relative merits of the various materialsthey employ. A brief description of the most widelyemployed indirect methods is provided below:

1. M etal deposition . This process involves using an RPmodel with a good surface nish that incorporates adraft angle and an allowance for the shrinkage of themoulding material. The pat tern is embedded along itsparting line into plasticine within a chase. The sprue,gates and ejector pins are added and, after theexposed half of the mould is coated with a releaseagent, a 23 mm thick shell of a low-temperaturemolten metal is deposited over it. Once a metallicshell has been created, water cooling lines can beadded and the shell is back lled with epoxy resin orceramic to improve the strength of the mould. Thesematerials are selected because their coef cient of thermal expansion is close to t hat of th e nickel or zinc

Fig. 16 Assembly of the cross- ow wat er jacket of a V6 high-performance ra cing engine [ 50 ]

Fig. 17 The frozen stress distribution for a model of anaeroengine turbine rotor [ 51]




14/24

from which the shells are made. Aluminium powderis usually mixed with the epoxy resin or the ceramicto increase the thermal conductivity. After theback lling material is cured, it is machined at. Thesecond half of the tool is built following the sameprocedure [ 50 , 53 ].

2. R oom temperature vulcanizing ( R T V ) . This processis an easy, relatively inexpensive and fast wayto fabricate prototype or pre-production tools.RTV tools are a lso known as silicone rubbermoulds. The most widely used fo rm of RTVmoulding is vacuum casting . The vacuum castingprocess includes the following main steps, as shownin Fig. 18 [ 53]:(a) producing a pattern (any RP method can be

employed);(b) adding venting and gating to the pat tern;(c) setting-up the pattern on the parting line and

then suspending it in a mould casting frame;

(d) pouring a deaerated silicone rubber into thecasting frame around the pattern;

(e) curing the mould inside a heating chamber;(f) removing the pattern from the silicone mould by

cutting along the parting line and then closingand sealing the mould;

(g) pouring a urethane resin into the mould inside avacuum chamber;

(h) curing the part in a heating chamber for 24hours and then removing it from the mould;

(i) cutting off the gate and risers from the casting tomake an exact copy of the pattern.

This process is best suited for projects where form, tor functional testing can be done with a material thatmimics the chara cteristics of the pro duction m aterial.

3. Epoxy tooling . Th is process is used for manu facturingprototype parts or limited runs of production parts.Epoxy tools are used as [ 53 ] moulds for prototypeplastic injection, moulds for castings, compression

Fig. 18 Vacuum casting process. (Courtesy of MCP)




15/24


16/24

7. Fusible metallic core [2]. Fusible metallic coretechnology is a new method for forming complex,hollow, one-piece plastic components that may bedif cult to produce by any other method. Thistechnology can be considered as a variation of investment casting. The difference between the twoprocesses is in the material of the sacri cial patterns

employed. In particular, low melting point alloys areused instead of wax. RP techniques can be applied tobuild part and core models that assist in fabricatingthe casting dies to make the cores. The fusible coresmust have the internal shape of the part. Usually, thecore is designed to be placed into a suspendedposition in the mould and is contained within themould. The moulded parts encapsulate the remova-ble cores that are melted away by induction heatingor by immersing the mouldings in hot water or oil.Cores can have a melting point of up to 220 8Cdepending on the alloys used.

8. Sand casting . The sand casting process is oftenemployed for the production of relatively large metalparts with low requirements for surface quality. RPtechniques can be utilized to create master patternsfor fabricating sand moulds. These moulds areproduced by placing RP patterns in a sand boxwhich is then lled and packed with sand to form themould cavity. When employing RP techniques, it iseasy to build patterns tha t include compensation forthe shrinkage of the castings as well as additionalmachining stock for the areas requiring machiningafter casting. The other bene ts of employing RPtechniques are signi cantly reduced lead-times andincreased pattern accuracy.

9. 3D KeltoolTM

process . This process is based on a metalsintering process introduced in 1976. The 3DKeltool

TM

process converts RP master patterns intoproduction tool inserts with very good de nition andsurface nish. It includes the following steps [ 58]:(a) fabricating master patterns of the core and cavity;(b) producing RTV silicone rubber moulds from the

patterns;(c) lling the silicone rubber moulds with a mixture

of powdered steel, tungsten carbide and polymerbinder with particle sizes of around 5 mm toproduce green parts (powdered metal heldtogether by the polymer binder) duplicating themasters;

(d) ring the green p arts in a furna ce to remove theplastic binder and sintering the metal particlestogether;

(e) in ltrating the sintered parts (70 per cent denseinserts) with copper in a second furnace cycle to

ll the 30 per cent void space;(f) nishing the core and cavity.The material properties allow inserts produced usingthis process to withstand more than 1 000000moulding cycles.

Indirect tooling methods are intended as prototyp-ing or pre-production tooling processes and notproduction methods. Consequently, tools fabricatedemploying these methods will exhibit differences com-pared to production tools, e.g. larger draft angles,simpler part shapes and lower mechanical and thermalspeci cations. These d ifferences affect the produ ction

cycle time, the part mechanical properties and the toollife. However, the aim of these tooling methods isgenerally not to replace production tooling but to makeonly up to a few hundred parts; therefore these tools donot require the strength for a long life. For the samereason, they do not need to be as ef cient as productiontools and it is justi able to adopt a longer cycle time perpart to compensate for poor thermal conductivity.

4.2 Direct methods for rapid tool production

Indirect methods for tool production as described in theprevious section necessitate a minimum of one inter-mediate replication process. This might result in a loss of accuracy and could increase the time for building thetool. To overcome some of the drawbacks of indirectmethods, some RP apparatus manufacturers havepropo sed new rapid t ooling methods that allow injectionmoulding and die-casting inserts to be built directlyfrom three-dimensional CAD models.

Direct RT methods enable the production of insertscapable of surviving from a few dozen to tens of thousands of cycles and represent good alternatives totraditional mould-making techniques. The durability orlife expectancy of t he inserts p roduced b y these methodsvaries signi cantly, depending on the material and theRT method employed. This makes the application areaof direct RT processes also very wide, coveringprototype, pre-production and production tooling.According to their application, direct RT processescan be divided into two main groups.

The rst group includes less expensive methods withshorter lead-times that are appropriate for tool valida-tion before changes become costly. Direct RT methodsthat satisfy these requirements are called methods for rm tooling (also known as bridge tooling [ 58]). RTprocesses for rm tooling ll the gap between soft an dhard tooling, producing tools capable of short prototyperuns of approximately fty to a hundred parts using thesame material and manufacturing process as for nalproduction parts.

The second group includes RT methods that allowinserts for pre-production and production tools to bebuilt. RP apparatus manufacturers market these meth-ods as hard tooling solutions [ 58 ]. Currently availablesolutions for hard tooling are based on the fabricationof sintered metal (steel, iron and copper) powder insertsin ltrated with copper or bronze (DTM RapidTool TM




17/24

process, EOSINT metal from EOS, three-dimensionalprinting of metal parts from Soligen).

The most popular direct RT methods are presentedbelow:

1. Direct ACES TM

Injection M oulds ( AIM TM

) . With thismethod, SL is used to produce epoxy inserts forinjection mould to ols for thermop lastic part s (Fig. 20)[2, 15 , 59]. Because the temperature resistance of thecurable epoxy resins available at p resent is only up t o200 8C (Cibatool 1 SL5530HT) and thermoplasticsare injected at temperatures as high as 300 8C(572 8F), speci c rules apply to the design andproduction of this type of injection moulding inserts[60]. Runners, fan gates and ejector pin clearanceholes are added to the CAD model and the inserts areshelled to a recommended thickness of 1.27mm(0.05inch). The inserts are then built using theaccurate clear epoxy solid (ACES) style [ 50] on anSL machine. The supports are subsequently removedand the inserts are polished in the direction of thedraw to facil itate part release. To remove themaximum amount of heat from the tool and reducethe injection moulding cycle time, copper watercooling lines are added and the back of the inserts

is lled with a mixture made up 30 per cent byvolume of aluminium granulate and 70 per cent of epoxy resin. The cooling of the mould is completedby blowing air on the mould faces as they separateafter the injection moulding operation. To increaseboth the resistance to erosion and the thermalconductivity of Direct AIM

TM

tools, the depositionof a 25 mm layer of copper on the mould surface hasbeen investigated [ 58].

2. L aminate tooling . The original LOM process pro-duces parts with a wood-like appearan ce using sheetsof pa per. Experiments to build moulds directly orcoated with a thin layer of metal have been reported[61 ]. U nfortuna tely, moulds built in th is way can on lybe used for low-melting thermoplastics and are notsuitable for injection moulding or blow moulding of common thermoplastics. F or this reason, new mate-rials based on epoxy or ceramic capable of with-standing harsh operating conditions have beendeveloped. The polymer composite process is beinginvestigated and the rst industrial a pplication isexpected in the near future. The ceramic process isless advanced and requires more software andhardware modi cations to the LOM machine. F ewresults for these processes are available but current

Fig. 20 Direct AIMTM

injection mould




18/24

indications are promising. In addition, attempts havebeen made to use unbonded laminate tooling forpressure die casting [ 62 ]. In this case, the prototypetools are fabricated by clamping together laser-cutpro les in tool steel sheets.

3. RapidToolTM

process. This process employs SLS tobuild tooling inserts. The latest materials developed

for the RapidTool process of producing metal partsby SLS are L aserFormTM

and copper p olyamide(PA).Each of these materials requires different processingtechniques:(a) LaserForm

TM

[63]. This is a powder made of 420stainless-steel-based particles, coated with athermoplastic binder. The processing of Laser-Form can be broken down into two main stages[63]. During the rst stage (the green stage),tooling inserts are built layer by layer throughfusion of the binder in an SLS machine. In thesecond stage (oven cycle), the green part isconverted into a fully dense metal part byin ltration with molten bronze. During theoven cycle, between 450 and 650 8C the polymerevaporates and at 700 8C the sintering of theremaining steel powder begins. Then the insertsare heated up to 1070 8C where bronze in ltra-tion occurs driven by capillary action. To avoidoxidation of the steel surfaces, all processing isdone in a nitrogen atmosphere. The nal Laser-Fo rm inserts are 60 per cent stainless steel and 40per cent bronze fully dense parts, which can be

nished by any technique, including surfacegrinding, milling, drilling, wire erosion, EDM ,polishing and surface plating.

(b) Copper PA [64]. This is a metalplastic compositedesigned for short-run tooling ap plications invol-ving several hundred parts (100400 parts) fromcommon plastics. At the CAD stage, the insertsare shelled and cooling lines, ejector pin guides,gates and ru nners are included in t he design to bebuilt directly during the SLS process. No furnacecycle is required and un nished tool inserts canbe produced in a day. Only subsequent nishingis necessary before integration of the inserts inthe tool base. This includes sealing of the insertsurfaces with epoxy, nishing them with sand-paper and nally backing up the shell insertswith a metal alloy. The cycle times of mouldsemploying copper PA inserts are similar to thosefor metal tooling.

Development efforts have been directed towardsinsert design opt imization [ 2], increasing heat transferrates by producing inserts with conformal coolingchannels [ 65 ] and re ning insert nishing techniques[2].

4. SandFormTM

tooling . SandFormTM

zirconium andsilicon materials can be used to build moulds andcores directly from three-dimensional CAD data

employing the SLS process [ 2]. The sand mouldsand cores produced are of equivalent accuracy andhave properties that are identical to those of mouldsand cores fabricated with conventional methods.SandForm

TM

moulds and cores can be used for low-pressure sand casting.

5. EOS DirectT oolTM

process [66]. This process uses

proprietary metal powders that are selectively sin-tered in a specially developed machine. The sinteredparts are porous and usually must undergo in ltra-tion with an epoxy resin in order to increase theirstrength [ 66]. After in ltration, further polishing of the part surfaces is possible to achieve the qualityrequired for injection moulding inserts. The Direct-Tool

TM

process is mainly utilized for rapidly produ-cing complex inserts, the surfaces of which cannot bemachined directly. The process is a viable alternativefor prot otype and pre-production tooling applica-tions, requiring the manufacture of up to a fewthousand parts in common engineering plastics.

6. Direct metal tooling using 3DP. This RT process uses3DP to build tooling inserts in a range of materialsincluding stainless steel, tungsten and tungstencarbide. The process allows the fabrication of partswith overhangs, undercuts and internal volumes aslong as there is an escape route for the unused loosepowder. The production of metal parts includes thefollowing steps:(a) building the parts by combining powder and

binder employing the 3DP process;(b) sintering the printed parts in a furnace to increase

their strength;(c) in ltration of the sintered parts with a lowmelting point alloy to produce fully dense parts.

The 3DP process can be easily adapted for produc-tion of parts in a variety of material systems, e.g.metallic/ceramic compositions with novel materialproperties [ 24 , 67].

7. T opographic shape formation ( T SF) . This process isvery similar to 3DP. This technology is usedprimarily for the rapid production of moulds. Partsare built by successive layering of a silica powder andselective spraying of paraf n wax from an XYZ

controlled nozzle. The wax binds the powder to forma new cross-section of the part and also partiallymelts the previous layer to ensure good adhesion.Once a part is completed, it is sanded, coated in waxand then employed as a mould for the customerscomponent. Materials in use include concrete,

breglass and expanding foam [ 68].

Direct methods for tool production reduce the totalproduction time and the inaccuracies introduced byintermediate replication stages. The restricted range of materials available is still the most severe drawback of direct tooling methods, but materials are continuallyimproving and new mat erials a re regularly becoming




19/24

available. Special at tention should be p aid t o t he speci cdesign and nishing requirements of RT inserts becausethese aspects critically affect the capabilities of theprocess [ 69, 70]. A promising direction for furtherimprovement of direct tooling methods is to combinetheir capabilit ies with those of traditional toolingmethods. In this way, the application area of direct

tooling methods can be extended signi cantly.

5 APPLICATIONS OF RAPID TOOLINGTECHNOLOGY

The introduction of RT technology has enabled proto-type, pre-production and in some cases full productiontooling to be fabricated within signi cantly reduced timeframes. A sound understanding of the capabilities andlimitations of RT processes is essential in order toimplement the technology successfully.

This section presents three examples illustrating theapplication of the R apidTool

TM

process, one of the mostdeveloped direct RT methods, to aluminium gravity diecasting, plastics injection moulding and production of metal parts:

1. Die casting inserts . To evaluate the applicability of RapidTool

TM

to aluminium gravity die casting, insertsfor a windscreen wiper arm were built (Fig. 21). Theinserts were nished following the steps described inreference [ 2]. One o f the bosses at t he end of t he wiperwas used as a reference feature to achieve goodmatching of the two halves of the tool. The t ool wasused t o cast parts in LM6 aluminium alloy. Afterproducing 250 castings in four separate runs, nodegradation signs were visible on the insert surfaceso r o n t he ca st p ar ts. T he t est s sh owed t ha tRapidTool

TM

dies can be utilized for production of low- to medium-size batches of castings. Given thequality of the die material, it is estimated that over

ve thousand castings could easily be produced fromthe dies.

2. Injection moulding inserts . Th is example illustra tes thecapability of the RapidTool

TM

process for fabricationof injection moulding inserts. An insert was manu-factured for moulding the cap for a nose hairtrimmer. While the external surface of the part is

relatively simple, its internal features are much morecomplex. The internal surface of the cap consists of acone that transforms progressively into a squar e hole.The hybrid approach adopted was t o machine themould conventionally from steel and to make t hecore using the RapidTool

TM

process. As shown inFig. 22, the RapidTool core was built without theprotruding pin. This feature was judged to be toosmall and weak to be reproduced reliably by t heRapidTool

TM

process. Because of its simple shape, thepin was machined from steel and added later to theinsert. The tool thus manufactured by combining thecapabilities of conventional tooling techniques andthe RapidTool

TM

process was successfully used toproduce several hundred mouldings in ABS.

3. M etal parts: car seat f rame . The RapidToolTM

processcan also be used directly to build complex metal parts[69 , 70]. However, it must be borne in mind that theparts in th eir intermediate green stage are very fragileand must be handled with great care. Anotherproblem is that, in contrast to moulding inserts,such parts do not normally have at bases that can beused for in ltration during the furnace cycle. As anexample of what could be achieved, a fram e for a seatwas fabricated using LaserForm. Given its size, theframe was built in four pieces. Figure 23 shows one of these pieces. In order to produce it, its thickness was

rst increased to give more strength to the partduring the green stage. Then a base and some supportstructures were added before building the part usingthe SLS process. These support structures have twomain functions. The rst is to prevent distortion orbreakage of the pa rt d uring the cleaning and sinteringstages. The second is to facilitate the in ltration of the part during the furnace cycle. Finally, the fourpieces were brazed together and the support struc-tures were machined off.

6 FUTURE TRENDS

Research in the elds of RP and RT is just over 10 yearsold. In spite of this, signi cant progress has been madein widening the use of these technologies and in thedevelopment of new processes and materials. To achievelong-term growth in these elds and realize their fullpotential, a number of challenges remain. Thesechallenges could be grouped under the followingcategories:Fig. 21 Die casting tool produced from RapidTool TM inserts




20/24

Fig. 22 Building stages of the cap insert (three-dimensional design, in ltration, nishing, integration)

Fig. 23 One part of the frame after the furnace cycle




21/24

1. Productivity/cost of R P machines . To bene t trulyfrom the direct fabrication capabilities of RPprocesses, especially when the serial production of parts is targeted, their productivity should beincreased and machine costs reduced signi cantly.Currently, there are two ma in approaches to addres-sing these issues. With the rst approach, productiv-

ity is raised by increasing the number o f channelsused for data transfer (multiple one-dimensionalchannels) without modifying the working principlesof a process. The second approach is to develop anew generation of RP machines that are speciallydesigned for serial production and employ newmechanisms for data transfer (multiple/arrays of one-dimensional channels or two-dimensional chan-nels) a nd/or new ph ysical principles. It is expectedthat long-term growth in the RP industry will comefrom applications that are impossible/very dif cult,costly and time consuming to implement withconventional manufacturing techniques. Therefore,new RP machines should address the speci crequirements of these applications. For example,these new machines should allow improved accuracyand surface nish of RP parts, multi-axis depositionof material, direct building of multi-componentassemblies [ 71], fabrication of materially gradedstructures (in density and composition) and manu-facture of mesoscopic components and devices.Furthermore, it is expected that wider use of R Pmachines for rapid manufacturing would lead toreduction of their cost.

2. M aterials . On e o f t he m ain lim it at io ns o f R Pprocesses is the limited variety of materials and theirproperties, and also their relatively high cost.Signi cant research efforts are focused on thedevelopment of a broader range of materials thatsimulate very closely the properties of the mostcommonly used engineering plastics. In particular,much research is being conducted on the develop-ment o f new mat erials with h igh rigidity, high impactstrength and high tensile elongation at breaking.Also, a range of materials for fabrication of invest-ment casting patterns with low ash content, highimpact strength and good surface nish are currentlyunder development. Recently, the fabrication of multi-materials and heterogeneous objects hasattracted the attention of the research community.This is quite understan dable because RP is well suitedto building such objects. Functionally gradientcomponents could be manufactured from differentconstituent materials exhibiting continuously varyingcomposition and/or microstructure. Developments inthis area will make p ossible the fabrication of objectswith multiple and con icting functionality. Progressin the area is directly linked with the development of new CAD tools that are suitable for designingheterogeneous objects.

3. Process planning . Although process plans for buildingcomplex R P parts are reduced to containing onlythree operations (these usually being building parts,inspection and nishing, which can include painting)compared to the ma ny steps required by conventionalmaterial removal processes, the process planningtasks a ssociated with layer manufacturing require

special attention. These tasks include selecting thepart orientation, identifying the support structuresneeded, slicing and deposition path planning and thespeci cation of process parameters. Existingapproaches to addressing these problems fall intotwo categories: algorithmic and decision-supportsolutions [ 72 ]. The algorithmic approach relies ongeometrical reasoning mechanisms to nd solutionsfor these tasks. For example, this approach is used todetermine the part orientation in respect of someuser-de ned criteria (minimization of the supportstructures required, avoidance of trapped volumes,improving part quality and engineering properties),to study the in uence of different deposition patternsand pro cess parameters on pa rt pro perties, to identifyoverhanging features requiring support structuresutilizing STL le facets, solid models or slice data,and to develop new techniques for slicing (adaptiveslicing and slicing of heterogeneous objects). Thesecond approach employs decision-support methodsto perform tasks that require quantifying the trade-offs between competing goals. Such process planningmethods employ multi-criteria optimization techni-ques, analytical models and heuristics [ 73]. Withincreases in part complexity and the wide range of available RP materials and RP machines, there is aneed for more advanced process planning tools, inparticular tools that could relate process variables topart quality characteristics and address the process-speci c requirements associated with the fabricationof parts from heterogeneous materials.

4. RP data formats and design tools . The stereolitho-graphy (STL) format was introduced in the earlyyears of RP technology and is considered a de factostandard for interfacing CAD and RP systems. TheSTL format has a number of dra wbacks [ 74 ] that areinherent in the representation scheme employed. Theuse of other standard formats for product dataexchange such as IGES, HPGL, STEP and VRMLhave been considered in place of STL, but asproblems remain these alternative formats are notwidely accepted. Work on the development of newformats continues in order to address the growingrequirements of R P and RT applications for moreprecise methods of data representation. Also, inrecent years, with the emergence of RP processes forfabrication of heterogeneous objects, there is anincreasing interest within the research community indeveloping new CAD tools that enable objects withvarying material composition and/or microstructure




22/24

to be designed [ 72]. Currently, a number of CADsystems for constructing such objects are underdevelopment employing voxel-based methods [ 75 ],generalized cellular decomposition [ 76 ], nite elementbased methods [ 76 , 77] and constructive methods [ 78 ].As already mentioned, advances in this area aredirectly linked to research and development in

technologies capable of producing materially gradedstructures.

7 CONCLUSIONS

The remarkable increase in the number of commerciallyavailable RP and RT solutions of the 1990s can beexplained by advances in three-dimensional CAD model-ling,compu ter aided manufacturing, computer numericalcontrol and the development of new materials. Thesetechnologies were used initially in the fast growing, highlycompetitive, high technology, aut omotive and aerospaceindustries, which generated added momentum. In the rstpart of the last decade, the annual growth in sales of RMsystems approached 4050 per cent. In the last few years,the same rapid growth has not continued. However,developments in this area still attract signi cant interestand in the last two years alone 208 new patents were led.In 1999, sales growth was 22 per cent and it was estimatedthat 3.4 million parts were built world wide using RPtechnologies [ 79]. Another important aspect is that theapplication of R P and RT ha s extended to other sectors of the economy (Fig. 24). This strong and consistent growthin sales and the widespread use of the technology presentvery optimistic prospects for t he future of rapid manu-facturing.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This survey of R P and R T processes was carried out aspart of the Rapid Tooling and Manufacturing ,Advanced Rapid Manufacturing and SupportingInnovative Product Engineering and Responsive Man-ufacture (SUPERMAN) projects part nanced by theER DF Objective 1 and Objective 2 programmes. The

authors would like to thank the referees for theircomments, which have helped to improve the paper.

REFERENCES

1 Kruth, J. P. Material incress manufacturing by rapidprotot yping technologies. Ann. CIRP , 1991, 40 (2), 603614.

2 Pham, D. T. an d Dimov, S. S. R apid M anufacturing: T heTechnologies and A pplications of Rapid Prototyping and R apid Tooling , 2001 (Springer-Verlag, London).

3 Pham, D. T. and Ji, C. Design for stereolithography. Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs, Part C: J. M echanical EngineeringScience , 2000, 214 (C5), 635640.

4 Onuh, S. O. an d Hon, K. K. Application of the Taguchimethod and new hatch styles for quality improvement instereolithography. Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering M anufacture , 1998, 212 (B6), 461472.

5 Cubital Web page, Cubital Limited, Raanana, Israel,2001, http://www.cubital.com/.6 MicroTEC Web page, Gesellschaft fu r Mikrotechnologie

Gmb H, Duisburg, G ermany, 2001, www.microtec-d.com.7 Objet Web page, Objet Geometries Limited, Rehovot,

Israel, 2000, http://clients.tia.co.il/objet/inner/products.html.

8 Sachs, E., Cima, M., Williams, P., Brancazio, D. an dCornie, J. Three dimensional printing: rapid tooling andprototyping directly from a CAD model. Trans. ASM E, J. Engng for Industry , November 1992, 114 , 481488.

9 3D Systems Press Release, ThermoJet, 3D Systems,Worldwide Corporation HQ, Valencia, California, 1998.

10 Stratasys Web page, Stratasys, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minne-sota, 2001, www.stratasys.com.

11 Spencer, J. D., Dickens, P. M. and Wykes, C. M. Rapidprototyping of metal parts by three-dimensional welding.Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering M anufac-ture , 1998, 212 (B3), 175182.

12 Anon, State of the Art Review-93-01, MTIAC, Chicago,Illinois, 1993.

13 Liu, Q. an d Orme, M . On precision droplet-based net-formmanufacturing technology. Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering M anufacture , 2001, 215 (B10), 13331355.

14 Merz, R., Prinz, F. B., Ramaswami, K., Terk, M. an dWeiss, L. F. Shape deposition manufacturing. In Proceed-ings of the 5th Symposium on Solid Freeform Fabrication ,Austin, Texas, 810 August 1994, pp. 18.

Fig. 24 The use of RP systems in different sectors [ 79]




23/24

15 Pham, D. T., Dimov, S. S. an d Lacan, F. Selective lasersintering: applications and technological capabilities. Proc. Ins tn M ech. Engrs , Part B: J. Engineering M anufacture ,1999, 213 (B5), 435449.

16 Pham, D. T. an d Wang, X. Prediction and reduction of build times for the selective laser sintering process. Proc. Ins tn M ech. Engrs , Part B: J. Engineering M anufacture ,2000, 214 (B6), 425430.

17 Childs, T. H ., Berzins, M ., Ryder, G. R. and Tontowi, A.Selective laser sintering of an amorphous polymersimulations and experiments. Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs,Part B: J. Engineering M anufacture , 1999, 213 (B4), 333349.

18 Kathuria, Y. P. Metal rapid prototyping via a lasergenerating/selective sintering process. Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering M anufacture , 2000, 214 (B1),19.

19 Optomec Web page, Optomec Design Company, Albu-querque, N ew M exico, 2000, http ://www.optomec.com/.

20 POM Web page, Precision Optical M anufacturing, Ply-mouth, Michigan, 2001, www.pom.net.

21 AeroMet Web page, AeroMet Corporation, Eden Prairie,Minnesota, 2001, www.aerometcorp.com.22 Texas Instruments Web page, Digital Light Processing,

Texas Instruments, 2001, www.dlp.com.23 SRI Web page, SRI International, Menlo Park, California,

2001, http://pguerit.sri.com/SriWeb/srihome.html.24 MIT Web page, MIT, Three Dimensional Printing Group,

1999, http ://me.mit.edu/groups/tdp/.25 Sachs, E., Cornie, J ., Brancazio, D. , Bredt, J., Curodeau,

A., Fan, T., Khanuja, S., Lauder, A., Lee, J. an d Michaels,S. Three dimensional pr inting: the physicsa nd implicationsof additive manufacturing. Ann. CIRP , 1993, 42 (1), 257260.

26 Helisys Web page, Helisys, Inc., Torrance, California,2000, http://helisys.com/.

27 Karunakaran, K. P., Dibbi, S., Shanmuganathan, P. V.,Raju, D. S. and Kakaraparti, S. Optimal stock removal inLom-Rp. Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs, Part B : J. Engineering M anufac ture , 2000, 214 (B10), 947951.

28 KIR A Web page, KIRA Corporation, Aichi, Japan, 2000,www.kiracorp.co.jp.

29 Corbel, S., Allanic, A. L., Schaeffer, P . and Andre, J. C.Computer-aided ma nufacture of three-dimensional o bjectsby laser space-resolved photopolymerization. J. Intell. R obot ic S yst ems , 1994, 9, 310312.

30 Song, Y. an d Chen, Y. H. Feature-based robot machiningfor rapid prototyping. Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs, Part B : J. Engineering M anufac ture , 1999, 213 (B5), 451459.

31 Chichkov, B. N. , Momma, C., Nolte, S., von Alvensleben, F.an d Tunnermann, A. Femtosecond, picosecond and nano-second laser ablation of solids. Appl. Physics , 1996, A63 ,109115.

32 Momma, C., Nolte, S ., Chichkov, B. N., von Alvensleben, F.an d Tu nnermann, A. Precise laser ablation with ultrashortpulses. Appl. Surf. Sci. , 1997, 109110 , 1519.

33 Pham, D. T., Dimov, S. S., P etkov, P. P. and Petkov, S. P.Laser milling. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part B: J . Engineering M anufac ture , 2002, 216 (B5), 657667.

34 Shirk, M. D. an d Molian, P. A. A review of ultrashortpulsed laser ablation of materials. J. Laser Applic. , 1998,10(1), 1828.

35 Kautek, W. and Kruger, J. Femtosecond pulse laserablation of metallic, semiconducting, ceramic and biologi-cal materials. Proc. S PIE , 1994, 2207 , 600610.

36 Preuss, S., Demchuk, A. and Stuke, M. Sub-picosecond UVlaser ablation of metals. Appl. Physics , 1995, A61 , 3337.

37 von der Linde, D. an d Sokolowski-Tinten, K. The physicalmechanisms of short-pulse laser ablation. Appl. Surf. Sci. ,2000, 154155 , 110.

38 Toenshoff, H. K., von Alvensleben, F., Ostendorf, A.,Willmann, G. and Wagner, T. Precision machining usingUV and ultrashort pulse laser. Proc. SPIE , 1999, 3680 ,536545.

39 Mendes, M., Oliveira, V., Vilar, R., Beinhorn, F., Ihlemann,J. an d Conde, O. XeCl laser ablat ion of Al 2 O 3 TiCceramics. Appl. Surf. Sci. , 2000, 154155 , 2933.

40 Pham, D. T., Dimov, S. S., Petkov, P. P. and Petkov, S. P.Rapid manufacturing of ceramic parts. In Proceedings of 17th National Conference on M anufacturing R esearch ,2001, pp. 211216 (Professional Engineering Publishing,Bury St Edmunds and London).

41 vande Crommert, S., Seitz, S., Esser, K. K. and McAlea, K.

Sand, die and investment cast parts via the SLS selectivelaser sintering process. DTM GmbH, Hilden, Germany,1997.

42 DTM Corporation, CastForm: Guide to M aterials , 1998(DTM Corporation, Austin, Texas).

43 A natomics Case S tudies , 2000 (Anatomics Pty Limited,Queensland, Australia), http://glacier.qmi.asn.au:80/ anatomics/.

44 DUrso, P. S., Atkinson, R. L., Lanigan, M. W., Earwaker,W. J., Bruce, I. J., Holmes, A., Barker, T. M., Effeney, D.J. and Thompson, R. G. Stereolithographic biomodelling incraniofacial surgery. Br. J. Plastic Surgery , 1998, 51(7),522530.

45 DUrso, P. S. an d Redmond, M. J. Method for theresection of cranial tumours and skull reconstruction. Br. J. N eurosurgery , 2000, 4(6), 555559.

46 DUrso, P. S. , Barker, T. M., Earwaker, W. J., Bruce, I. J.,Atkinson, R. L., Lanigan, M. W., Arvier, J. F. an d Effeney,D. J . Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillo-facial surgery: a prospective trial. J. Cranio-maxillofacialSurgery , 1999, 27 , 3037.

47 Materialise Product Information, Mimics software,Materialise, Leuven, Belgium, 2000, ht tp:/ /www.materialise.be/.

48 CALM Project Final Report, Universi ty of CentralLancashire, Preston, 1998, http://www.uclan.ac.uk/clt/ calm/overview.htm.

49 Gatrzen, J., Lingens, H., Gebhardt, A. an d Schwarz, C.Optimisation using TH ESA. In Prototyping T echnology International 98 , 1998, pp. 3638 (UK and InternationalPress, Surrey).

50 Jacobs, P. F. Stereolithography and other RP&M technol-ogies. Society of Manufacturing EngineersAmericanSociety of Mechanical Engineers, 1996.

51 3D Systems Newsletter: The Edge , Summer 1994 (3DSystems, Valencia, California).

52 Raymond, N. C. an d Thomas, V. J. A comparison of rapidprototyping techniques used for wind tunnel modelfabrication. Rapid Prototyping J. , 1998, 4(4), 185196.

53 Pham, D. T., Dimov, S. S. and Lacan, F. Techniques forrm tooling using rapid prototyping. Proc. Instn Mech.




24/24

Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering M anufacture , 1998, 212 (B4),269277.

54 Mueller, T. Stereolithography-based proto typing: casehistories of application in product development. In IEEETechnical Application and Conference Workshops, Port-land, Oregon, 10 O ctober 1995, pp. 305309.

55 Dickens, P. M. Ra pid to oling: a r eview of the a lternatives. R apid News , 1996, 4(5), 5460.

56 Schaer, L. Spin-casting fully functional metal and plasticparts from stereolithography models. In Proceedings of the6th International Conference on Rapid Prototyping , Day-ton, Ohio, 1995, Vol. 27, pp. 217235.

57 Mosemiller, L. an d Schaer, L. Combin ing RP andspin-casting. In Prototyping Technology International97 , 1997, pp. 242246 (UK and International Press,Surrey).

58 Jacobs, P. F. Recent advances in rapid tooling fromstereolithography. White Paper, 1996 (3D Systems, Valen-cia, California).

59 Hopkinson, N. an d Dickens, P. M. Using stereolithographytools for injection moulding: research into tensile tool

failure and unexpected bene ts of the process. Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs , Part B: J. Engineering M anufacture , 2000,214 (B10), 891899.

60 Decelles, P. an d Barritt, M. Direct AIM TM

PrototypeT ooling, Procedural Guide , 1996 (3D Systems, Valencia,California).

61 Pak, S. S., Klosterman, D. A., Priore, B., Chartoff, R. P.an d Tolin, D. R. Tooling and low volume manufacturethrough laminated object manufacturing. In PrototypingTechnology International 97 , 1997, pp. 184188 (UK andInternational Press, Surrey).

62 Soar, R. and Dickens, P. M. Design limits of unbondedlaminate tooling for pressure die-casting. Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering M anufacture , 2001, 215 (B4),531543.

63 DT M Product InformationLaserFormTM

, 2000 (DTMGmbH, Hilden, Germany); DTM Product Information,Copper Polyamide M old Insets for Plastic I njection M old-ing , June 1998 (DTM Corporation, Austin, Texas).

64 Dalgarno, K. W. an d Stewart, T. D. Manufacture of production injection mould tooling incorporating confor-mal cooling channels via indirect selective laser sintering.Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering M anufac-ture , 2001, 215 (B10), 13231332.

65 Fritz, E. Laser-sintering on its way up. In PrototypingTechnology International 98 , 1998, pp. 186189 (UK andInternational Press, Surrey).

66 Sachs, E., Guo, H., Wylonis, E., Serdy, J., Brancazio, D.,Rynerson, M. , Cima, M. an d Allen, S. Injection moldingtooling by 3D printing. In Prototyping Technology Inter-national 97 , 1997, pp. 322325 (UK and InternationalPress, Surrey).

67 Formus Web page, F ormus, San Jose, California, 2000,www.formus.com.

68 Shi, D. and Gibson, I. Improving surface quality of

selective laser sintered rapid prototype parts using roboticnishing. Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs, P art B : J. Engineering

M anufacture , 2000, 214 (B3), 197203.69 Dimov, S. S., Pham, D. T., Lacan, F. an d Dotchev, K. D.

Rapid tooling applications of the selective laser sinteringprocess. Int. J. A ssembly T echnol. M anagmt , 2001, 21, 107116.

70 Volpato, N., Childs, T. H. C., Stewart, T. D. an d Watson,P. Indirect selective laser sintering of metal parts withoverhung features. Proc. Instn M ech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering M anufacture , 2001, 215 (B6), 873876.

71 Birnnard, M. Design by Composition for R apid Prototyping ,1st edition, 1999 (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The

Netherlands).72 Dutta, D., Prinz, F. B., Rosen, D. an d Weiss, L. Layermanufacturing: current status and future trends. Trans. A SM E , J. Computing and Inf. Sci. Engng , 2001, 1, 6071.

73 West, A. P., Sambu, S. an d Rosen, D. W. A processplanning method for improving build performance instereolithography. Computer-Aided Des. , 2001, 33(1), 6580.

74 Kumar, V. an d Dutta, D. An a ssessment of dat a formats forlayer manufacturing. Adv. Engng Software , 1997, 28(3),151164.

75 Wu, Z. W., Soon, S. H. and Feng, L. NU BS-based volumemodelling. In Internat ional Workshop on V olume Graphics ,Swan sea, 1999, pp . 321330.

76 Jackson, T., Liu, H. , Patrikalakis, N. M., Sachs, E. M. an dCima, M. J. M odelling and Designing Functionally Graded M ater ial Components for Fabricat ion with L ocal Compos i-tion Control, M aterials and Design , 1999, Special Issue,(Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

77 Kumar, V. A. an d Wood, A. Representation and design of heterogeneous components. In Proceedings of SF F Con-ference, Austin, Texas, 1999.

78 Bhashyam, S., Shin, K. H. an d Dutta, D. An integratedCAD system for design of heterogeneous objects. Rapid Prototyping J. , 2000, 6(2), 107118.

79 Wohlers, T. Wohlers Report 2000: executive summary.T ime-Compression Technologies , 2000, 8(4), 2931.


Documents

Rapid Prototyping and Rapid Tooling