arXiv Report 2020 Volume 0 (1981), Number 0

RAMPVIS: Towards a New Methodology for DevelopingVisualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

M. Chen1 , A. Abdul-Rahman2 , D. Archambault3 , J. Dykes 4 , A. Slingsby4 , P. D. Ritsos5 , T. Torsney-Weir 3, C. Turkay 6 ,B. Bach 7, A. Brett 8, H. Fang 9 , R. Jianu 4 , S. Khan 10 , R. S. Laramee 11 , P. H. Nguyen 12 , R. Reeve 13 ,

J. C. Roberts 5 , F. Vidal 5 , Q. Wang 11, J. Wood 4 , and K. Xu 141University of Oxford, 2King’s College London, 3Swansea University, 4City, University of London, 5Bangor University, 6Warwick University,

7University of Edinburgh, 8UK Atomic Energy Authority, 9Loughborough University, 10Horus Security Consultancy Ltd., 11Nottingham University,12Red Sift Ltd., 13University of Glasgow, and 14Middlesex University London, United Kingdom

AbstractThe effort for combating the COVID-19 pandemic around the world has resulted in a huge amount of data, e.g., from testing,contact tracing, modelling, treatment, vaccine trials, and more. In addition to numerous challenges in epidemiology, healthcare,biosciences, and social sciences, there has been an urgent need to develop and provide visualisation and visual analytics (VIS)capacities to support emergency responses under difficult operational conditions. In this paper, we report the experience of agroup of VIS volunteers who have been working in a large research and development consortium and providing VIS supportto various observational, analytical, model-developmental and disseminative tasks. In particular, we describe our approachesto the challenges that we have encountered in requirements analysis, data acquisition, visual design, software design, systemdevelopment, team organisation, and resource planning. By reflecting on our experience, we propose a set of recommendationsas the first step towards a methodology for developing and providing rapid VIS capacities to support emergency responses.

1. Introduction

Visualisation and visual analytics (abbreviated as VIS) has beenused extensively in many mission-critical applications and health-care applications. Since the emergence of COVID-19, data visu-alisation has been widely visible in traditional and online mediafor disseminating information related to COVID-19. Meanwhilewhat has not been obvious to the public is the fact that VIS tech-niques can be or have been used to help domain experts in combat-ing COVID-19. For example, mathematically, deriving an optimalmodel to forecast the contagion patterns of COVID-19 in differentconditions (e.g., geographical, social, seasonal variation; differenthuman intervention; etc.) is an intractable problem. While mod-elling is an important tool for scientists to obtain a good under-standing of COVID-19 and to assist decision-makers in exploringdifferent intervention policies, it is necessary to provide modellingscientists and epidemiologists with a collection of VIS techniquesthat enable them to perform various observational, analytical, andmodel-developmental tasks rapidly and easily.

RAMP VIS [RAM20] is a group of VIS volunteers, who an-swered a call to support the modelling scientists and epidemiol-ogists in the Scottish COVID-19 Response Consortium (SCRC)[The20b]. The group was assembled as part of the rapid responsesorganised by the Royal Society (UK) [The20a]. As a volunteer-ing operation in an emergency context, the VIS volunteers encoun-tered many challenges. For example, the time urgency demandedrapid development of usable VIS tools, the travel restriction and the

domain experts’ heavy workload hampered in-depth requirementsanalysis, and parallel developments of pandemic models and datainfrastructure entailed delays in accessing data to be visualised. Inaddition, there was a shortage of skilled developers for designingand engineering a VIS system, and a fair amount of uncertainty inorganising and scheduling volunteering resources.

The VIS volunteers made time urgency as their top priority, andwere grouped into seven teams according to the available VIS ex-pertise as well as different VIS needs in the SCRC modelling work-flow. The grouping also enabled each team to progress indepen-dently in terms of requirements analysis, visual design, and systemengineering. To our best knowledge, the experience of RAMP VISvolunteers is unprecedented in the VIS literature. In this paper, wedescribe our approaches to address the challenges in the overallRAMP VIS organisation as well as in the activities of individualteams. By reflecting on our experience, we propose a set of recom-mendations as the first step towards a methodology for developingand providing VIS capacities to support an emergency response.The main contribution of this work is thus the report of the RAMPVIS experience, our reflection, and a proposed methodology.

2. Related Work

In this section, we review the application of VIS to emergency re-sponse and healthcare and discuss the existing methodologies thatmay be used to develop VIS in such applications.

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and JohnWiley & Sons Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

arX

iv:2

012.

0475

7v1

[cs

.HC

] 8

Dec

202

0

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

VIS for Emergency Responses. Emergency response has been aregular theme in VIS since 2005 [DJA∗16]. Kwan and Lee [KL05]incorporate geospatial visualisation into a real-time 3D emergencyresponse system to support quick response to terrorist attacks. Chit-taro et al. [CRI06] introduce VU-Flow, a 3D visual environmentthat provides navigation guidance to users during emergency sim-ulations. Based on the data collected from large community dis-aster events (e.g., 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina), Campbell et al.[CMF∗08] use visualisation-based interactive simulation for train-ing emergency response teams. Natarajan and Ganz [NG09] intro-duce distributed visual analytics for managing emergency responsebetween geographically dispersed users. Waser et al. [WRF∗11]incorporate visual designs into simulation-based investigation offlood disasters to recommend appropriate response strategies. Ma-ciejewski et al. [MLR∗11] introduce PanViz, a VIS toolkit provid-ing decision support for simulated pandemic scenarios. Ribicic etal. [RWG∗12] develop a VIS interface to provide flood simulationsto non-expert users. Konev et al. [KWS∗14] incorporate interactivevisual designs into a simulation-based approach for flood protec-tion planning. Gelernter et al. [GMS18] provide visualisations toguide first responders at a crisis scene. Visualising social mediadata is commonly used to support emergency responses for situ-ational awareness [MJR∗11], resource allocation [JTM∗19], criti-cal infrastructure management [TKE16] and post-disaster analyt-ics [HA19, MBPG19, ND19]. Whitlock et al. [WWS19] integrateVIS tools with mobile and immersive technologies to support crit-ical operations during emergency response.

VIS plays a critical role in mission-critical applications suchspace missions. Abramyan et al. [APN12] develop an immersivevisualisation environment for controlling space robots remotely onthe Earth. Edell and Wortman [EW15] introduce advanced visuali-sations to assist the diagnosis of operational problems and failuresfor Van Allen Probes, a NASA space mission.

Furthermore, the IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Sci-ence and Technology (VAST) host an international challenge work-shop annually since 2006. Competition entries demonstrated novelVIS solutions for epidemic spread [VAS10, VAS11a], illicit activi-ties [VAS11b,VAS18a,VAS18b], security streaming data [VAS16a,VAS16b, VAS16c] and natural disasters [VAS19].

Unlike most of the prior work generally carried out in prepara-tion for a future emergency, this work was conducted during theperiod of an emergency response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

VIS for Healthcare. The healthcare industry benefits from theadoption of Visualisation and Visual Analytics. Rind et al.[RWA∗13] review VIS tools developed for the exploration of elec-tronic health records. Carroll et al. [CAD∗14] review 88 articles onVIS tools for infectious disease. Gotz and Borland [GB16] discusschallenges unique to the healthcare industry and the critical rolethat VIS plays in the domain. McNabb and Laramee [ML17] con-duct an extensive survey of surveys including the adoption of VISin the healthcare sector. Preim and Lawonn [PL20] survey the useof VIS for supporting decision making in the public health sector.

The VIS techniques used in healthcare often incorporate an-alytical techniques. For example, Event Sequence Simplificationis used to reduce visual complexity of sequential clinical events

[WGP∗11, MLL∗13, GS14, GJG∗19], and support a more effi-cient decision support process [Aug05]. Natural Language Pro-cessing is used to extract textual data from raw clinical datasets[ZAR∗11, GGC∗17, SSBC19]. Machine Learning help automatingthe processing of clinical data and providing guidance to clini-cians and researchers, including Active Learning [BSB∗15], Sup-port Vector Machine [TPC∗18], Topic Modelling [GNDV∗18] andRecurrent Neural Networks [KCK∗19].

The main difference between this work and the prior work isthat we had to develop multiple VIS capacities rapidly to addressdifferent VIS needs concurrently.

Methodologies for VIS Applications. Design study methodol-ogy [SMM12] builds on the nested model of design and valida-tion [Mun09] to provide guidelines, pitfalls, and a process that helpvisualisation researchers design systems in applied contexts. Thismethodology uses the metaphor of “the Trenches”, which is wherewe found ourselves, and so, just as others have adapted its conceptsand processes across varied settings [LTM18, SMR∗20], this paperreports our approach that adopts, adapts and sometimes contradictsestablished guidance in the context of rapid emergency response.

Workshops [KGD∗19, KcMM20] can speed up requirementsgathering. The five-design sheets methodology [RHR16] can struc-ture the sketching process. Collaborative design methodologies[LSCK20] can address issues due to travel restrictions, and as-sist rapid visualisation design processes [DHA∗20]. Some priorwork in VIS advocates different software engineering methodolo-gies [BJ75, HT90]. The agile approach (Kanban boards, SCRUM,etc.) is particularly suitable for developing VIS systems in appli-cations with changing characteristics of data, users, and tasks. Arecently-proposed method based on the cost-benefit analysis canpotentially be used to discover shortcomings in a VIS workflow andexplore potential solution systematically [CE19]. We have drawninspiration from these methodologies in our work.

3. Formulating the RAMPVIS Approach

The Scottish COVID-19 Response Consortium (SCRC) [The20b]was established in April 2020 by researchers in three Scottish or-ganisations in response to a call from the Royal Society for RapidAssistance in Modelling the Pandemic (RAMP) [The20a]. The goalof the Consortium was to develop a more robust and clearer under-standing of potential medium- and long-term strategies for control-ling the COVID-19 epidemic in Scotland and in the UK. The Con-sortium currently has over 150 members from 36 organizations.

On 14 May, Dr. Richard Reeve, the SCRC modelling coordina-tor, first met a VIS scientist. They discussed the SCRC’s overallrequirements for visualisation. As shown in the first sketch in Fig-ure 1(a), SCRC initially only required assistance for visualising theresults of modelling, reflecting the widespread perception of visual-isation as a tool only for information or knowledge dissemination.The VIS scientist described how different VIS techniques could en-able domain experts to observe data quickly, analyse data with theaid of data mining algorithms, and improve their models through,e.g., visualisation of ensemble data, parameter space, and resultsfrom sensitivity or uncertainty analysis. Dr. Reeve embraced the

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

(a) before discussion (b) after discussion

Figure 1: Two sketches illustrate the major change of the role ofVIS in the SCRC modelling workflow during the initial discussion.The symbols “V” in pink circles indicate the needs for VIS.

idea of integrating VIS techniques throughout the modelling work-flow, and revised the original sketch soon after (Figure 1(b)). TheVIS scientist (referred to as VIS coordinator hereinafter) indicatedthe need to enlist the help from many VIS experts.

The following day (15 May), the VIS coordinator sent an emailcall for VIS volunteers to many VIS scientists, researchers, anddevelopers in the UK, some of whom forwarded the call to oth-ers. By June 1, 22 VIS volunteers (including the VIS coordina-tor) answered the call. There are 19 faculty members, two indus-trial researchers, and one academic research officer. Among them,14 indicated being able to prototype VIS software, and seven in-dicated willingness to engineer VIS systems. By June 2, the co-ordinator held meetings with all 21 volunteers individually or insmall groups. The VIS volunteers had been using a diverse range ofprogramming platforms. The most common denominator is D3.js[BOH11]. Five VIS volunteers had experience of coding in D3.js(one became unavailable a few weeks later).

At that time, several teams in SCRC were working on six differ-ent epidemiological models and one team on inference and modelvalidation, while substantial effort was devoted to the developmentof a data infrastructure for storing modelling results as well as cap-tured data related to COVID-19 spread in Scotland. For the VISvolunteers, there were many unknowns, such as what data might beavailable, how it may be retrieved, what were the requirements ofindividual domain experts and individual models, and so on.

While the agile methodology in software engineering [Lar03]and the nested model [Mun09] in visualisation advocate the neces-sity of iterative requirements analysis and software evaluation, theydo not prescribe a full requirements analysis and software eval-uation within a single iteration. Otherwise, they would be simi-lar to the waterfall methodology. In the VIS literature, many ap-plication papers indicate that it usually takes many months toacquire a meaningful set of requirements (e.g., six months in[ARLC∗13,FWD∗17] and 12 or more months in [LD11,ERB∗21]).To support an emergency response, a lengthy delay due to require-ments analysis would not be acceptable. Hence we had to comple-ment user-centred requirements analysis with the existing knowl-edge documented in the VIS literature, and commenced the devel-opment as soon as we had understood a partial set of requirements.

As reviewed in Section 2, many papers in the literature reportedVIS techniques and tools for supporting healthcare applications,

model development, and mission-critical operations. If one canidentify the data types, user tasks, and user knowledge in an ap-plication, one can relate them to the requirements in previouslyreported applications that featured similar characteristics of data,tasks, and users. During the two weeks when we were recruitingVIS volunteers, we gained our understanding of:

• Datatypes — Based on several briefs from the SCRC modellingteams, we quickly learned that there would be a huge amount oftime series data, and some geographical data (e.g., maps), net-work data (e.g., contact tracing), and multivariate data (e.g., de-mographic data). Building on our knowledge of VIS literature,we anticipated that some other types of data that might resultfrom analytical algorithms, such as similarity matrices.

• User tasks — Building on our knowledge of other VIS appli-cations, we quickly established that there would be a need forviewing time series in different ways for observation and com-parison, in order to evaluate a model run against captured data,other runs, and other models. We anticipated that some analyticaltasks would benefit from data mining algorithms, and at a laterstage, domain experts would become interested in ensemble datavisualisation and parameter optimisation.

• User knowledge — Building on our experience working withother domain experts, we anticipated that (i) domain expertswere highly knowledgeable about their own models, but couldnot avoid frequent observation of captured data and model re-sults; and (ii) they were familiar with the major geographicallocations in Scotland, but would need to incorporate map-basedvisualisation for smaller regions in Scotland and other UK re-gions.

Meanwhile, we also consulted the abstracted theories andmethodologies in the VIS literature. We observed that there wasa need for all four levels of visualisation [CG16]. As illustrated inFigure 1, although disseminative visualisation was the initial re-quirement, the above considerations about data, tasks and usersconfirmed that the priority should be given to observational, an-alytical, and model-developmental visualisation.

The VIS volunteers were thus organised into several teams, in-cluding a generic supporting team (focusing on observational vi-sualisation), an analytical support team, four modelling supportteams, and a disseminative visualisation team. We placed all D3.jsdevelopers into the generic support team, and distributed other VISvolunteers according to their expertise and time capacity. In thefollowing four sections, we report the activities of these teams, in-cluding further requirement analysis conducted by each team.

4. Generic Support and RAMP VIS Infrastructure

Infrastructure Setup. The generic support team consists ofmainly VIS volunteers who can program in D3.js and have devel-oped and deployed VIS systems. Our requirement analysis indi-cated that domain experts were not able to observe data regularly.Using the recently-proposed method for optimising VIS workflows[CE19], we quickly identified that this was caused by the cost ofreading and visualising data using spreadsheets, and a solution is todevelop a VIS infrastructure closely coupled with the SCRC datainfrastructure that was being developed. The goal of the team was

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

(a) UI components

quick-access sidebar

(b) dashboards (c) visualisation plots

personal portal

search

clickable visualisation objects

modelling results with uncertainty

derived data created by an analytical agent

multi-stream plot

tooltip interaction individually-clickable data objects

search results

Figure 2: The RAMP VIS server (vis.scrc.uk) provides users with a user interface (with search facility, personal portal, etc.), a collection ofdashboards (with clickable visual and data objects), and various plots for visualising the data hosted by the SCRC data infrastructure.

to enable observational visualisation for every piece of data held bythe data infrastructure.

The development of the SCRC data infrastructure started sev-eral weeks before VIS volunteers joined SCRC. A group of profes-sional research software engineers (also volunteers) have carriedout the design and implementation since. The goal is to capture theprovenance of models and their results, enabling all contributing el-ements traceable from results to models and the conclusions drawn.Transparency is thus a key principle. All models and core softwarecomponents are open-source [The20c]. Hence the VIS infrastruc-ture has also been developed in the open.

The UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) pro-vides the data and VIS infrastructure featuring virtual machines onthe STFC cloud service, including a chat platform for collaborationand a data registry for web applications. The readiness of STFC foremergency responses enabled the hardware for the VIS infrastruc-ture to be available within 24 hours after our request.

As emergency responses, the SCRC data infrastructure, VIS in-frastructure, and six epidemiological models were developed inparallel. While the generic support team was waiting for the mea-sured data, we had access to some Scotland data in three spread-sheets, which contained over 300 time series and a few data tables.We anticipated that there would be at least thousands of time serieswhen data from other regions and model runs became available.Such scale would be a challenge to the domain experts as well asthe VIS developers. Users would need to assess the relevant plotsquickly, while developers would need to adapt each visualisationprogram (referred to as a VIS function) to other applicable data withminimal development effort.

User Interface. To address the need of the domain expert users,the RAMP VIS server provides the following facilities (Figure 2):

• A user interface (UI) with a side bar for accessing visualisationsorganised in categories;

• A multi-keyword search facility;• A personal portal for storing frequently-used visualisations;• Because each visualisation is given a unique URL, users can also

tag frequently-used visualisations on a web browser;

• A collection of dashboards, each providing links to other dash-boards and visualisation plots.

On the RAMP VIS server [NKA20], there are broadly two typesof visualisations, dashboards and plots. Each dashboard is designedto show key indicators and/or summary plots that some domain ex-perts need to view frequently. For example, it may show the dailydata of a region or a summary of a model run (Figure 2(b)). Someinformation may serve as overviews while others serve as detailedviews. The data objects, visual widgets, or summary plots on adashboard are all clickable, providing a gateway to fuller or moredetailed visualisations or other dashboards when required. In ad-dition to a set of pre-defined dashboards, the generic support teamprovides a service to SCRC domain experts for constructing newdashboard whenever needed.

The team have developed a variety of visualisation plots. Asshown in Figure 2(c), some plots feature interactive capabilities,some compare multiple data streams, some convey the analyticalresults produced by data mining algorithms, and some display mod-elling results with estimated uncertainty.

Architecture and Ontology. To address the aforementioned sec-ond need for propagating each VIS function (either a dashboard ora plot) to other applicable data, the team has designed and devel-oped an ontology- and agent-based architecture for the RAMP VISserver [KN20]. When a VIS developer fetches a task of writing aVIS function in D3.js, an infrastructure manager creates a programtemplate with one or more example data streams. The binding ofthe VIS function and the given data streams results in a uniqueweb page. Once the development completes, the VIS function canbe reused by replacing the sample data stream with other applica-ble data streams. Through a simple UI, the infrastructure managerqueries a Search Service to find all suitable candidate data streams,finalises a collection of data streams for propagation, and calls aPropagation Agent to create new bindings (and web pages) forthese data streams automatically.

As illustrated in Figure 3, in the VIS infrastructure, an ontol-ogy provides the vital support to the search facilities that enableusers to find desired dashboards and plots and the infrastructure

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

UI

Web-based VIS

search

portal

web pages

Ontology

dashboards

plots

cached search

bookmark service

analytical agents

propagation agent

downloader agent

search service

Data Streams

VIS Functions

OntoPage

OntoVis

OntoData

D3.js programs and example data streams [and web links]

fetched data streams derived data streams sidebar

index agent authentication thumbnail agent authorisation

SCRC Data Infrastructure

VIS developers

VIS infrastructure manager

data products

Figure 3: The architecture of the RAMP VIS server, featuring its ontology, agents, and services, and their relationships with the UI, webpages (dashboards and plots), VIS functions (programs and test data), fetched and derived data streams, and SCRC data infrastructure.

manager to find applicable data streams for propagation. The on-tology is a graph data structure that stores the relationships amongall VIS functions, all data streams, and all data-VIS bindings (andthe resulting web pages). Because we modelled the ontology us-ing a document data model [Cho13], we implemented the ontologyusing three MongoDB database collections, which are:

• OntoVis for defining and keeping the records of all VIS func-tions and their metadata;

• OntoData for storing the records of all data streams and theirmetadata;

• OntoPage for maintaining the binding points between VIS func-tions and data streams, there metadata and the URLs of the cor-responding web pages.

As shown in Figure 3, in addition to the aforementioned SearchService and Propagation Agent, there are:

• A Downloader Agent for fetching data from dynamically-changing data automatically from the SCRC data infrastructure;

• A set of Analytical Agents, each applies an analytical func-tion or data mining algorithm to a predefined collection of datastreams and generates derived data to be rendered, e.g., a simi-larity matrix of a collection of time series (see also Section 5);

• An Indexing Agent that periodically scans the database opera-tion logs and updates various textual descriptions in the ontology,which may be used in search or displayed by VIS functions;

• A Thumbnail Agent for creating and updating the thumbnailsof dashboards and plots that may change due to the dynamicchange of the underlying data.

• A Bookmark Service for managing bookmarks in users’ portals;• An Authentication Service for approving a user’s login action;• An Authorization Service for distinguishing ordinary or admin-

istrative users.

The RAMP VIS server was implemented with backend microser-vices using two state-of-the-art REST-API frameworks: JavaScript-based NodeJS and Python-based Flask. The I/O-intensive oper-ations (e.g., database or file-system access) are performed asyn-chronously and are implemented with a NodeJS microservice. TheCPU intensive operations (e.g., running Analytics Agents) are im-plemented with a Flask microservice. The Flask framework alsoprovides Analytics Agents with some off-the-shelf analytical li-braries, e.g., NumPy, SciPy, scikit-learn. The SCRC data infrastruc-ture provides the Downloader Agent with Python APIs to fetch H5data.

5. Analytical Support

As exemplified by numerous visual analytics papers, VIS appli-cations with a large data repository are expected to employ bothdata analysis algorithms and visualisation techniques. For exam-ple, analytical tasks have been critical for assessing model perfor-mance and uncertainty (e.g., comparing predictions to observationsand comparing multiple model runs) [KMG∗06], and for explor-ing epidemiological data (e.g., identifying areas, time periods, ordemographic groups exhibiting similar trends in outbreak progres-sion) [BGH∗13]. With the huge number of time series to be hostedby SCRC data infrastructure, we anticipated that simply relying onobservational visualisation might not be efficient or effective. Wethus grouped several VIS volunteers with strong data mining expe-rience into the analytical support team.

After several attempts to acquire detailed requirements for an-alytical visualisation capacity, we learned a high-level require-ment from some modelling scientists, i.e., “cross-model validation”would be needed at some stage. With their expertise and initiatives,the team members anticipated that comparing time series wouldbe an unavoidable analytical need because of the sheer volume ofdynamically expanding time-series data. The initial data availableto the team contained hundreds of time series for different regionsof Scotland, different indicators (e.g., test, case, hospitalised, andfatality), different genders and age groups, and so on. While wait-ing for modelling data to be prepared for comparative analysis, theteam started to develop visual analytics techniques for summaris-ing, simplifying, and comparing time series and for searching andvisualising patterns and structures in the data. Building on the VISliterature on time-series [AMST11], we anticipated the followinganalytical tasks: (i) discovering recurring trends, (ii) looking foroutliers, (iii) identifying clusters, and (iv) measuring similaritiesaccording to one or more characteristics (e.g., scale, gradient, timelag, etc.). The team’s anticipation was confirmed when more dataand specific requirements arrived several months later.

Guided primarily by these tasks, we experimented with a num-ber of analytical visualisations in conjunction with an analyticaltoolbox that consists of different metrics and algorithms for quanti-fying the characteristics of individual time series, computing pair-wise similarities, and transforming the time series to feature spacesthat enable their similarities and clustering to be visualized.

Analytical Toolbox. We started developing the analytical tool-box by creating a library of low-level analytical filters that treat

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

TestingData

Algorithm&VisualizationExperimentation

RealData

AnalyticalAgentsDeployment Derived

DataAnalytical

PlotsAlg/VisDesigns

Analytical Toolbox• 1D metrics• Distance metrics• Time-lag• PCA, MDS• ....

Figure 4: The analytical support team develops and experiments with different analytical algorithms and visual representations (top left)and selects some designs to be deployed on the VIS infrastructure by the generic support team (top right). The lower part of the figure showsexamples of analytical visualisations for time series analysis, including time-lag plot, force-directed graph, scatter plot, and heatmap matrix.

time series as 1-D signals. Since time series may contain noise,various types of filters (e.g., flat, Hanning, Hamming, Bartlett, andBlackman windows) can be used to smooth time series when re-quired. We then added a comprehensive library of analytical met-rics for measuring the distance, difference, similarity, or error be-tween two time series (e.g. mean square error and many of itsvariations, Pearson correlation coefficient, structural similarity in-dex measure, mutual entropy, Spearman correlation coefficient,Kendall’s tau, peak signal-to-noise ratio, F-test, and so on). Wefurther included algorithms such as dynamic time warping (DTW)and dimensionality reduction methods such as principal componentanalysis (PCA) and multi-dimensional scaling (MDS).

Analytical Visualisations. We also experimented with a num-ber of visual representations, focusing on comparing N time serieswith T data points. If one needs to determine any group of k seg-ments of time series that may be similar, the number of possiblegroups to be observed would be at the level of O(NkT k), hence us-ing analytical algorithms to narrow down the search space is highlybeneficial [CG16]. However, relying on metrics alone is not suf-ficient since time series could be similar/dissimilar due to factorsnot encoded in the data (e.g., differences in terms of demographyand intervention). In that respect visualisation provides ways fordomain experts to incorporate their knowledge when analysing andcomparing different time-series. Figure 4 shows one set of our ex-periments for analysing the time series associated with the 14 re-gional health boards in Scotland.

• A time-lag visualisation two compares time series by registeringthem using a cross-correlation that computes the displacement ofone time series relative to the other. A viewer can foresee whatthe future may look like in one board if it follows the same trendsas another board, but with a delay.

• A heatmap matrix shows pairwise similarity scores among allN time series reported by different health boards. Row or col-umn headers can be accompanied by time-series profiles for de-tailed observations. This is especially important when the simi-larity/difference measures are difficult for viewers to interpret.

• A force-directed graph produces a layout where the N nodes rep-resent N time series, and the length of each edge encodes thesimilarity/difference (short/long) between a pair of nodes. This

visual representation is particularly useful for users to discoverclusters of similar time series and outliers.

• A chord diagram, which is shown in Figure 2, places N time se-ries as segments/nodes along a circle, and uses the thickness orcolor of each chord to encode the similarity/difference measures.

• A scatter plot compares N time series in their feature space. Typ-ically, two most important features (e.g., principal componentscomputed using PCA) are selected as the axes of a 2-D space,and each time series is positioned as glyphs in the space accord-ing its feature coordinates.

When the analytical support team examined these experimentresults with the domain experts, one domain expert commented“These give us a lot to think about. It is not that we do not requirethese. We just overwhelmed by what visualisation can do.”

Infrastructural Support. As shown on the right of Figure 4, fol-lowing the experiments, the analytical support team selects analyt-ical algorithms and visual representations to be integrated into theVIS infrastructure maintained by the generic support team. Eachanalytical algorithm becomes an analytical agent, while each vi-sual representation becomes a plot. Because many data streams inthe infrastructure are updated dynamically, each analytical agentis scheduled to recompute various measures and generate deriveddata automatically. In this way, when an analytical plot is called, italways displays the analytical results based on the latest data.

6. Modelling Support

Mathematically, finding an optimal model to forecast the contagionpatterns of COVID-19 in different conditions (e.g., geographical,social, seasonal variations, different human interventions, etc.) isan intractable problem. Nevertheless the effort to develop bettermodels and improve existing ones is both necessary and desirable.When VIS volunteers were first gathered together, we anticipatedthat supporting the model development in SCRC would be the mostchallenging undertaking, because VIS would have to support thesearch for better models in an NP space [CG16]. We therefore or-ganised some 10 VIS volunteers into four modelling support teams(referred to as Teams MA, MB, MC, and MD below), providing op-portunities for each team to focus on supporting one or two SCRCmodelling teams through close collaboration.

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

6.1. Team MA: Supporting 1-km2 Spatial Simulation

Model Simulation.jl [HCR∗20] simulates the spread of COVID-19based on spatial proximity and its effect on the local population ac-cording to its demographic structure, over time. The inputs are pop-ulation counts in 10-year age-bands in 1×1km2 to 10×10km2 gridcells across Scotland. Given an initial set of “seed” locations on day0, the model outputs the number of people in different COVID-affected categories for each subsequent day by age group in thesame grid cell. Figure 5 shows a set of simulation results.

We met the domain experts as the first version of the model wasbeing created. There was an urgent need to visually inspect the rel-ative proportions of COVID-affected individuals in different cate-gories over time and space. When discussing the high-resolutionmodel outputs and strategies one might use to summarise them tovalidate model outputs and (later) to compare different modellingscenarios, the need to freely explore these prior to establishing fixedtabular summaries became apparent. As this need was so urgent, wequickly established two VIS requirements: to enable (i) studyingthe relative proportions of COVID-affected individuals in differentcategories over space and time, and (ii) exploring the results at dif-ferent scales from Scotland-wide to 1-km2 neighbourhoods.

Our solution to these challenges was to use interactive“tilemaps” [Sli18] (also known as “glyphmaps” [WHWC12] and“embedded plots” [GW15]) with (a) glyphs representing multipleaspects of the modelled output together and (b) on-the-fly inter-active gridding of the output at a suitable resolution in response tozoom/pan user interaction. The technical challenge was to make in-teraction, with this very high-resolution data quick and responsiveenough to facilitate, rather than impede, exploration.

On the left of Figure 5, data at a coarse spatial resolution is su-perimposed on a map of Scotland. The glyphs in the top, left im-age show the aggregated temporal trend as the population movesthrough the COVID-affected categories, with significantly lowerproportions of affected populations in the lower populated areas ofNW Scotland. The image below this is a snapshot on day 32, show-ing the different rates at which the virus is affecting the population.The right column is a more detailed view of SE Scotland, as a re-sult of zooming/panning. The snapshot on day 32 (bottom right)shows that the virus is affecting different age groups differently.This is largely due to differences in resident population structure.Domain experts with knowledge of population density can see thatlow-density areas seem to act as “firebreaks”. Although this is theinner working of the spatial spreading algorithm, its appearance inthe visualisation started a debate among the domain experts, influ-encing the next stage of model development – to investigate theimportance of population density on speed of disease spread. Theinteractive tilemaps with glyphs have provided a basis for the ongo-ing work for evaluating the relative importance of different factorsin the modelling and comparison of different lockdown scenarios.

6.2. Team MB: Supporting Simple Network Simulation

The Simple Network Simulation (SNS) is a disease state progres-sion model with multiple potential inputs and outputs [ETd∗20].The former include spatial models of social interaction at a varietyof scales, the latter varying according to model parameters and by

Figure 5: Model output showing proportion of population byCOVID-affected category for the whole of Scotland (left) and moredetail in SE Scotland (right). Top: glyphs show change in propor-tion of COVID-affected population (top-bottom) from day 0 (left) today 60 (right). Bottom: proportion of COVID-affected population(left to right) for different age groups (young-old; top-bottom).

time, age-group and geography. When we connected with the SNSteam, they were considering simulating commuting patterns duringlockdown by grouping daily flows for those in employment sectorsdifferently effected by the “work from home” edict of April 2020.Their graphical approach used origin-destination matrices of datarecorded in the UK Census of Population. However, flow quanti-ties, group differences, and any geographic variations or effects ofscale were difficult to see (Figure 6).

We began with a design challenge and used this to immerse our-selves in the problem [HBH∗19] – learning about the SNS model,gaining trust and finding other problems to which effective visu-alisation might be usefully applied. Our frequent, rapid feedbackmechanisms encouraged creative thinking [GDJ∗13,KGD∗19] anddiscourse around data [BDRW20]. Involving video-calls, emoji-filled chat streams and structured design documents, we mightcharacterise them as mini BIE loops [MDM16] in which redesignmight result in a shift in emphasis ranging from zero to a total

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

Figure 6: Largest daily flows between MSOAs in Glasgow on atransformed GridMap. Certain destinations clearly have flow sig-natures that are greater (red) or less (blue) than the proportionspredicted by regular daily flows under this ‘lockdown’ scenario.

switch of channel [WBD14]. This approached lockdown immer-sion [HBH∗19], through which we enriched our understanding ofthe modellers domain, explored new spaces for design and enquiryand built relationships within and beyond the SNS team.

This enabled us to collectively identify and visually explore twospecific domain questions: (a) which types of workers should weinclude in the input network (and what difference does this maketo outputs)? (b) what do model outputs look like (and how do theyvary over time and by age-group)? Further questions that we hopedto address were: (c) how do the answers vary with scale and geog-raphy? (d) is visualisation effective in answering these questions?

The discourse resulted in some preliminary answers to thesequestions. For instance, for questions (a, c), the nature of the in-put network has an effect on outputs, with distinct spatial variationand greater effect at smaller scales. We redesigned graphics, allow-ing us to identify the areas most affected by the industry factor,areas with high out-of-area epidemiological importance, and thesources of those who visit them (Figure 6). But they do not dictatethe scale or content of the network we should use. This resulted ina better informed input network and an emphasis on smaller scale“data zones”. For (b, c), model outputs were not particularly var-ied by space, time or attribute, but we do have plausible candidatemethods that will allow such variation to be detected and assessedwhen the SNS models are finalized. Importantly, the engagementalso enables us to be more confident about injecting visualisationinto the modelling process, to shine light on the models as theyare developed, tested, and parameterised, in ways that had not beenconsidered by the modellers (Figure 1), and perhaps at fine scale.

6.3. Team MC: Supporting Contact Tracing Modelling

By the time VIS volunteers joined the SCRC, the contact tracingmodel [MMB∗20] was already in development. The model simu-lates the spread of COVID-19 through a dynamic network that en-codes the potential contacts among millions of individuals. Thesesimulations result in some very large temporal networks [HS12].

2930

4841

9206

4246

76647556

3024

6110

9265

6079

8568

2127

2314

2780

9134

5242

9240

6109

3065

8905

1593

8290

2307

8551

5779

1603

849

1768

4624

542

2861

7147

1261

176

992

4911

5704

6841

1274

375

613

2252

1257

1258

3287

2483

6461

3446

7068

5674

3708

68156390

2354

3533

2351

9928

6533

3078

3447

8529

4567

6298

34488724

3154

5163

455

7910 8528

3796

6830

4640

5349 8492

9245

481

9068

4636

484

7126 7134

1448

7138

1499

9471

7311

4990

2525

7460

7298

4575

7713

7617

7282

2552

2547

7290

5007

2364

7605

8711

7440

5017

2666 4373

1086

9524632

5721

9405

2975

1800

1347

8721

1064

1314

10399403

8818

4164

2641

89

1591

4886

4198

3021

6994

8056

5960

6418 2643

1422

2278

30157879

7891

6859

7974

70792589

9197

90369811

9810

827

2201

598

7681

68586855

7207

6028

3839

6874

2059 2568

3109

26271855

94586909

3406

2628

508

8737

9255

73775055

4206

73752603

1813

8138

4176

1740

7168

4186

9343

3513

5711

7484

5714

4519 7485

86344104

5712

4347

8

5299

180

1644

1643

8035

1185

3238

196

7402

5732

3449

1727

6303

7403

2413

988

1225

2164

5888

3950

2722

9986

3739

414

7744

5438

794

9593

240

8502

6534

3740

107

9932

121

8349

3295

4655

3675

117

7496

1034

724

1513

4238

2529

5813

4140

1554

8236

2973

1677

1552

4141

8281

2270

1228

8278

8569

2553

4496

8645

8308

8565

6115

5329

3177

3845

459

7567

6543

8531 1025

1883

25582557

39476490

1894

19988484

24222420

1884

9925

1451

5328

911

8602

6613

6933

7364

8588

5078

9139

6611

7182

904

5789 9478

8778

454

8779

458

452

9421

2571

1981

5985

72407937

8306

3701

83055097

6048

5881

4516

17

1594

8463

61299329

6228 57227410

43836927

5428

8523

6145

7759

9475

9190

5019

7649

8089

7139

244

1267

5106

6669

21863102

2771

4181

8494

4341

4741

71356249

6970

4282

7062

2675

7765

6720

9497

2859

3631

1530

9500

7767

2668

9563

40148211

1590

2417

8592

5435

5858

523

4158

5856

4156

6640

3665

3233

2987

525

6955

8888

4755

3093

6928

4758

9714

3092

8892

7799

6828

3090

4802

1676

2901

1950

6670

1953

94153622

1033

1296

104

1282 3983

3842

1662

1266

5481

3402

3844

3698

2144

3431

5265

3976

4508

2530

7424

8994

68144808

8090

1586

6813

4704

8213

5376

3828

3831

5832

9380

8279

4447

8251

8833

Figure 7: Some of the largest infection chains visualised – withasymptomatic transmissions highlighted (left), and with indexnodes and locations of infections expressed along with a visual in-dication of the sizes of the chains (right). The visual analysis wasalso enriched with extracted graph-theoretic metrics (left-bottom).

We immediately established bi-weekly meetings with the mod-elling scientists. It quickly became clear that the domain expertsdid not have access to bespoke network visualisation tools, andwere primarily relying standard plots to view simulation results asdisease progression curves and some summary metrics such as R.They were also comparing different intervention policies throughsuch plots. We noticed that the temporal networks, which were usedto derive the summary information, were never visualised. Hence,the first urgent requirement for VIS was to enable domain experts toobserve such networks in order to gain an intuitive understandingabout the temporal and topological behaviours of the model. Thevisualisation would also assist domain experts in communicatingmodelling results and informing policy making.

We addressed the requirement by using existing network vi-sualisation tools to minimise the delay due to software devel-opment. This allowed us to build familiarity with the modeland the data, while providing example visualisations to stim-ulate our discussions with the domain experts. We then pro-gressed to more advanced VIS techniques, e.g., employing scalablegraph-drawing techniques [SAK18, SAK20], geographic-inspiredmetaphors [GHK10], and graph-theoretic analysis for derived met-rics to complement network visualisation (Figure 7).

With bi-weekly collaboration meetings providing continuousfeedback and ideas, we improved our prototypes iteratively througha web-based “project diary” and an open software repository[TAX∗20]. As the collaboration matured over the period, we ob-served a trend that both domain experts and VIS volunteers activelycontributed to the discussions on model building and visual designtogether. It became difficult to label whether a discussion was aboutvisualisation or the model itself, and there were more discussionson generating insight than on producing software.

6.4. Team MD: Supporting Inference and Model Assessment

One group of SCRC modelling scientists have been focused onquantifying epidemic characteristics, effect of intervention, andmodel performance. From the onset, the VIS volunteers for sup-porting these modelling activities anticipated the use of ensembleand uncertainty visualisation. During an initial collaboration meet-

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

Figure 8: A prototype system for analysing and visualising ensem-ble data. The parallel coordinate plot (right) allows one to filterinput parameters, select a subset of time series to be aggregated,and display the aggregated curves (left).

ing, domain experts also confirmed the need for visualising the sen-sitivity of model parameters. The domain experts were working ontheir models in parallel, thus VIS volunteers were not able to ob-tain multi-run simulation data in the early months of the collabora-tion. VIS Team MD took initiatives to study two COVID-19 mod-els in the public domain, attempting to generate multi-run simula-tion data. Before this attempt could yield useful output, one SCRCmodel, ABC-smc [PFZ20] produced multi-run simulation data foruncertainty visualisation and parameter space analysis. By attend-ing modelling scientists’ meetings, the team were able to observethe interactions between the perspectives of modelling and uncer-tainty quantification, and established a set of requirements.

Similar to most multi-run simulation problems, VIS needed tosupport the analysis of many sets of model parameters and outputs.In this case, each dataset consists of some 200 time series and theircorresponding parameter sets. One obvious requirement is to visu-alise the uncertainty featured in the set of time series. As this is acommon requirement for all models with time series outputs, wepassed the requirement to the generic support team (see Figure 2).The team focused on the more complex tasks, i.e., (i) to identifyinput/output relationships, (ii) to determine key curve features suchas maximum or largest slope, and (iii) to compare outputs froma number of different model runs. Immediately after the require-ments analysis, we started to develop a VIS system iteratively, withincreasing facilities for analytics, visualisation, and interaction.

Figure 8 shows the current prototype after several iterations. Weused the design approach of coordinated multiple views [BRR03],the visual analytics approach for computing a set of curve fea-tures [TFA∗11], a parallel coordinate plot [ID90] for viewing andfiltering multi-dimensional parameter sets and curve features, andaggregated curves summarising the outputs of the selected param-eter sets. We are in the process of introducing new facilities, suchas slicing the multi-dimensional parameter space [TWSM17], us-ing functional box plots [WMK13, MWK14] to summarize manycurves, and the contribution-to-the sample-mean plot [BLCT09] toshow the sensitivity of outputs to input parameters.

7. Disseminative Visualisation

While most VIS volunteers were distributed among the aforemen-tioned six teams, we also created a small team for disseminative vi-sualisation since public information dissemination was the originaloverall requirement. One epidemiology researcher with interest in

data visualisation also joined the team. The team explored the pre-vailing approaches, in the UK and internationally, in public-facingvisualisations related to the pandemic. This ranged from those pro-duced by a number of governments (e.g., the four home nations inthe UK), organisations (e.g., WHO, UK ONS), universities (e.g.,Johns Hopkins dashboards), media outlets (e.g., FT Coronavirustracker), and non-commercial web services (e.g., Worldometers).

The team concluded that we should complement, but not du-plicate, the existing effort, and defined our goal as to inform thepublic about activities of SCRC through storytelling visualisation.We identified the following requirements: (i) to maintain scientificrigour, (ii) to retain scientific language, and (iii) to abstract visu-alisation output. For example, one of our initial designs used foot-ball result prediction and weather forecasting metaphors. Our rig-orous consideration indicated that the former might be associatedwith gambling, whereas the latter could be perceived as inaccurate,and they could have negative connotations to how epidemiologicalmodelling would be perceived.

Figure 9 illustrates our process for creating storytelling visuali-sation. It started with an ideation phase where we elaborated pre-liminary concepts and ideas. This was done using a combinationof the five-design sheets [RHR16] methodology (Figure 9(a)), an-imated PowerPoint mock-ups, and web-based prototyping. Thesesparked off other explanatory forms, e.g., infographics and slidepacks, such as in Figure 9(b), which were used to describe eachepidemiological model and the corresponding visualisations. As itwould be difficult to apply a unified narrative to every model, weopted for allowing each story to be developed independently.

Current storytelling visualisations have been implemented as: (a)web-based presentations using the Reveal.js framework, with SVG-based animations and the potential for directly feeding into themvisualisations created by other teams, (b) as video outputs of ani-mated presentations, and (c) as infographics, created using graphicseditors and creative design tools. We are in the process of creatinga public web server for hosting these storytelling visualisations.

8. Reflections and Recommendations

In this section, we reflect on our experience of developing VIS ca-pacities for emergency response, and translate our reflections to aset of recommendations as a step towards a new methodology.

Reflection on general perception of VIS as a dissemination tool.Expert users often see visualisation as “for informing others” ratherthan “for helping myself”. This can be a big stumbling block dur-ing requirement analysis. As illustrated in Figure 1, Dr. Reeve’sresponse during the first meeting helped overcome this stumblingblock, shortening the delay in requirements analysis by months.Meanwhile, to the disseminative visualisation team, creating suchvisualisation has not been an easy journey, especially without theadvice from an expert on public engagement.

Reflection on requirements analysis. During the pandemic, do-main experts were extremely busy. Different teams did not fol-low the same formula for requirement analysis. Modelling supportteams MB and MC followed the recommended method for user-centred requirement analysis, and benefited from frequent engage-

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

Figure 9: Storytelling visualisation creation process. (a) Initial concepts and ideas were explored using a combination of the five-designsheets [RHR16] method. (b) Following the progress of the modelling activities, these were transformed to animated presentations andinfographics, which incorporated visualisations from other teams (in this example, from Team MA).

ment. The generic support team and team MA identified urgent re-quirements quickly and began their development without much de-lay. The analytical support team, team MD, and disseminative vi-sualisation team had to use their knowledge to anticipate and anal-yse the potential requirements. In emergency responses, all of theseare valid methods. Several teams had positive experience in usingquickly-produced visualisations to stimulate requirement analysis.Team MB made good use of several communication mechanisms,including searchable threaded chat streams, structured feedback,and design exposition. A few VIS volunteers also found it reward-ing to attend domain experts’ meetings that at first appeared irrele-vant.

Reflection on team organization. The categorisation of visualisa-tion tasks based on the complexity of the search space of the pos-sible solutions is relatively new [CG16]. It informs us that modeloptimisation is an NP process in general, and it requires all threelevels of visualisation, i.e., observational, analytical, and model-developmental visualisation, which correspond to solution spacesof complexity O(n), O(nk), and NP. The complexity is likely to im-pinge on the effort for identifying VIS requirements. Hence, hav-ing a VIS team working with each modelling team was necessaryfor establishing such understanding. All teams quickly identifiedand addressed the observational requirements related to individ-ual models, and some have started to address the requirements formodel analysis and model optimisation. Meanwhile, the genericsupport team progressed to the development stage quickly becauseof not only the necessity but also the less complex search space.

Reflection on VIS resources. Using volunteer effort is not an idealsolution for emergency responses. It would be more efficient if wecould utilise an existing technical and knowledge infrastructure forsuch an emergency response, if such an infrastructure had existedfor other operations and had an advanced VIS server and a teamof VIS developers who were knowledgeable about different lev-els of visualisation tasks. Our volunteering effort was a make-shiftsolution, which benefited strongly from the academic knowledgeinfrastructure in the UK. Its progress could be more rapid if there

were more development resources. The organisation of VIS vol-unteers partly reflects the need to concentrate most developmentresources in the generic support team. Nevertheless, the outcomesdelivered by the VIS volunteers within the past six months withoutany funding are unprecedented. This demonstrates the importanceof VIS as well as volunteering effort in emergency responses.

Recommendation. Our approaches, experience, and reflectionsmay be translated to the following recommendations for future VISapplications in emergency responses:

• In December 2014, US President Barack Obama spoke to theNational Institutes of Health (USA): “There may and likely willcome a time in which we have both an airborne disease that isdeadly. And in order for us to deal with that effectively, we haveto put in place an infrastructure” [The14]. VIS should be part ofsuch an infrastructure, and the “readiness” of VIS technical andknowledge infrastructures will make a difference.

• While the agile principle [Mun09] fits well with VIS develop-ment for supporting emergency responses, one should be open-minded about different approaches. The diverse approachestaken by different VIS teams in the RAMP VIS effort indicatedthat standard practice might not always be applicable.

• VIS development in emergency responses can benefit tremen-dously from the existing VIS knowledge, in the form of theo-ries, methodologies, literature, and personal experience. The VIScommunity should improve its “readiness” by advancing abstractVIS knowledge in the form of theories and methodologies.

9. Conclusions

In this paper, we have reported the work carried out by a groupof VIS volunteers to support modelling scientists and epidemiol-ogists in combating COVID-19. Our approaches to the challengesthat we have encountered are rare and valuable contributions to thefirst step towards a methodology for developing and providing VIScapacity to support emergency response. The UK Research and In-novation recently awarded funding to the group, transforming thevolunteering effort to a more structured VIS operation in 2021.

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the SCRCmanagement team for its leadership, all SCRC members for theirselfless efforts, the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council(STFC) for providing hardware to SCRC and RAMP VIS, and theSTFC for providing and managing the SCRC hardware platform.

In particular, we would like to thank Dr. Rita Borgo who led theactivity described in Section 6.4 but could not be a co-author due toher co-chair role in EuroVis 2021. We thank other VIS volunteers,including Professor Nigel W. John, Dr. Helen C. Purchase, Dr.Stella Mazeri, Dr. William Teahan, Benjamin Nash, Tianci Wen,Dr. Dylan Rees, Elif E. Firat, and James Scott-Brown for their con-tributions to various VIS activities. In addition, we acknowledgethat some VIS activities have received support from Dr. AlessioArleo, Peter Butcher, Cameron Gray, Jeewan Hyongju, and EdisonMataj.

We would like to express our appreciation for Andrew Lahiff forsetting up and managing the RAMP VIS VMs, Sonia Michell foroffering innumerable pieces of advice on data products, and Dr. IainMcKendrick for leading the discussion on authorship guidelines.

Last but not least, our big thanks go to the modelling scientistsand epidemiologists who worked with the VIS teams closely andprovided valuable expert advice as well as datasets to be visualized.They include Dr. Jess Enright, Dr. Claire Harris, Professor LouiseMatthews, Dr. Glenn Marion, Dr. Sibylle Mohr, and Dr. ThibaudPorphyre.

References

[AMST11] AIGNER W., MIKSCH S., SCHUMANN H., TOMINSKI C.:Visualization of time-oriented data. Springer Science & Business Media,2011. 5

[APN12] ABRAMYAN L., POWELL M., NORRIS J.: Stage: Controllingspace robots from a CAVE on Earth. In 2012 IEEE Aerosp. Conf. (mar2012), IEEE, pp. 1–6. URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6187349/, doi:10.1109/AERO.2012.6187349.2

[ARLC∗13] ABDUL-RAHMAN A., LEIN J., COLES K., MAGUIRE E.,MEYER M., WYNNE M., JOHNSON C. R., TREFETHEN A., CHEN M.:Rule-based visual mappings – with a case study on poetry visualization.Computer Graphics Forum 32, 3pt4 (2013), 318–390. 3

[Aug05] AUGUSTO J. C.: Temporal reasoning for decision support inmedicine. Artif. Intell. Med. 33, 1 (jan 2005), 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2004.07.006. 2

[BDRW20] BEECHAM R., DYKES J., ROONEY C., WONG W.: Designexposition discussion documents for rich design discourse in applied vi-sualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics(2020). 7

[BGH∗13] BHASKARAN K., GASPARRINI A., HAJAT S., SMEETH L.,ARMSTRONG B.: Time series regression studies in environmental epi-demiology. International journal of epidemiology 42, 4 (2013), 1187–1195. 5

[BJ75] BROOKS JR F. P.: The mythical man-month. Addison-WesleyLongman Publishing Co., Inc., 1975. 2

[BLCT09] BOLADO-LAVIN R., CASTAINGS W., TARANTOLA S.: Con-tribution to the sample mean plot for graphical and numerical sensitivityanalysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 94, 6 (2009), 1041–1049. 9

[BOH11] BOSTOCK M., OGIEVETSKY V., HEER J.: D3 data-driven doc-uments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17,12 (2011), 2301–2309. 3

[BRR03] BOUKHELIFA N., ROBERTS J. C., RODGERS P. J.: A co-ordination model for exploratory multiview visualization. In Proceed-ings International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Ex-ploratory Visualization-CMV 2003- (2003), IEEE, pp. 76–85. 9

[BSB∗15] BERNARD J., SESSLER D., BANNACH A., MAY T.,KOHLHAMMER J.: A visual active learning system for the assessment ofpatient well-being in prostate cancer research. In Proc. 2015 Work. Vis.Anal. Healthc. - VAHC ’15 (New York, New York, USA, 2015), vol. 25-October, ACM Press, pp. 1–8. doi:10.1145/2836034.2836035.2

[CAD∗14] CARROLL L. N., AU A. P., DETWILER L. T., FU T.-C.,PAINTER I. S., ABERNETHY N. F.: Visualization and analytics toolsfor infectious disease epidemiology: A systematic review. J. Biomed. In-form. 51, 1 (oct 2014), 287–298. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.006. 2

[CE19] CHEN M., EBERT D. S.: An ontological framework for sup-porting the design and evaluation of visual analytics systems. ComputerGraphics Forum 38, 3 (2019), 131–144. 2, 3

[CG16] CHEN M., GOLAN A.: What may visualization processes opti-mize? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22,12 (2016), 2619–2632. 3, 6, 10

[Cho13] CHODOROW K.: MongoDB: the definitive guide: powerful andscalable data storage. " O’Reilly Media, Inc.", 2013. 5

[CMF∗08] CAMPBELL B. D., METE H. O., FURNESS T., WEGHORSTS., ZABINSKY Z.: Emergency Response Planning and Training throughInteractive Simulation and Visualization with Decision Support. In 2008IEEE Conf. Technol. Homel. Secur. (may 2008), IEEE, pp. 176–180.doi:10.1109/THS.2008.4534445. 2

[CRI06] CHITTARO L., RANON R., IERONUTTI L.: VU-Flow: A Visu-alization Tool for Analyzing Navigation in Virtual Environments. IEEETransactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 6 (nov 2006),1475–1485. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2006.109. 2

[DHA∗20] DIXIT R. A., HURST S., ADAMS K. T., BOXLEY C.,LYSEN-HENDERSHOT K., BENNETT S. S., BOOKER E., RATWANIR. M.: Rapid development of visualization dashboards to enhance sit-uation awareness of COVID-19 telehealth initiatives at a multihospi-tal healthcare system. Journal of the American Medical InformaticsAssociation 27, 9 (07 2020), 1456–1461. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa161. 2

[DJA∗16] DUSSE F., JÚNIOR P. S., ALVES A. T., NOVAIS R., VIEIRAV., MENDONÇA M.: Information visualization for emergency manage-ment: A systematic mapping study. Expert Syst. Appl. 45 (mar 2016),424–437. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.007. 2

[ERB∗21] ELSHEHALY M., RANDELL R., BREHMER M., MCVEY L.,ALVARADO N., GALE C. P., RUDDLE R.: QualDash: Adaptable gen-eration of visualisation dashboards for healthcare quality improvement.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27 (2021).3

[ETd∗20] ENRIGHT J., TURNER R., DE ALMEIDA R. C., BLACK-WELL R., GOROKHOVIK F., HUGHES C.: Simple Network Sim-ulation. https://github.com/ScottishCovidResponse/simple_network_sim, 2020. 7

[EW15] EDELL D., WORTMAN K. A.: Visualization of a Space-craft Mission Software System. In 2015 IEEE Aerosp. Conf. (mar2015), vol. 2015-June, IEEE, pp. 1–9. doi:10.1109/AERO.2015.7118894. 2

[FWD∗17] FANG H., WALTON S., DELAHAYE E., HARRIS J., STOR-CHAK D. A., CHEN M.: Categorical colormap optimization with visual-ization case studies. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and ComputerGraphics 23, 1 (2017), 871–880. 3

[GB16] GOTZ D., BORLAND D.: Data-Driven Healthcare: Challenges

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

and Opportunities for Interactive Visualization. IEEE Comput. Graph.Appl. 36, 3 (may 2016), 90–96. doi:10.1109/MCG.2016.59. 2

[GDJ∗13] GOODWIN S., DYKES J., JONES S., DILLINGHAM I., DOVEG., DUFFY A., KACHKAEV A., SLINGSBY A., WOOD J.: Creativeuser-centered visualization design for energy analysts and modelers.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12(2013), 2516–2525. 7

[GGC∗17] GLUECK M., GVOZDIK A., CHEVALIER F., KHAN A.,BRUDNO M., WIGDOR D.: PhenoStacks: Cross-Sectional Cohort Phe-notype Comparison Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualiza-tion and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (2017), 191–200. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598469. 2

[GHK10] GANSNER E. R., HU Y., KOBOUROV S. G.: GMap: drawinggraphs as maps. In Graph Drawing (GD ’09) (2010), pp. 405–407. 8

[GJG∗19] GUO S., JIN Z., GOTZ D., DU F., ZHA H., CAO N.: VisualProgression Analysis of Event Sequence Data. IEEE Transactions onVisualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (jan 2019), 417–426. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864885. 2

[GMS18] GELERNTER J., MAHESHWARI N., SUSSMAN A.: Visual-ization and Communication Tool for Emergency Response. In 2018IEEE Int. Symp. Technol. Homel. Secur. (oct 2018), IEEE, pp. 1–5.doi:10.1109/THS.2018.8574158. 2

[GNDV∗18] GLUECK M., NAEINI M. P., DOSHI-VELEZ F., CHEVA-LIER F., KHAN A., WIGDOR D., BRUDNO M.: PhenoLines: Pheno-type Comparison Visualizations for Disease Subtyping via Topic Mod-els. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1(2018), 371–381. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2017.2745118. 2

[GS14] GOTZ D., STAVROPOULOS H.: DecisionFlow: Visual analyt-ics for high-dimensional temporal event sequence data. IEEE Trans-actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12 (2014), 1783–1792. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346682. 2

[GW15] GROLEMUND G., WICKHAM H.: Visualizing com-plex data with embedded plots. Journal of Computationaland Graphical Statistics 24, 1 (2015), 26–43. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2014.896808, arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2014.896808,doi:10.1080/10618600.2014.896808. 7

[HA19] HORNBECK H., ALIM U.: UofC-Bayes: A Bayesian Approachto Visualizing Uncertainty in Radiation Data. In 2019 IEEE Conf. Vis.Anal. Sci. Technol. (oct 2019), IEEE, pp. 128–129. doi:10.1109/VAST47406.2019.8986936. 2

[HBH∗19] HALL K. W., BRADLEY A. J., HINRICHS U., HURON S.,WOOD J., COLLINS C., CARPENDALE S.: Design by immersion:A transdisciplinary approach to problem-driven visualizations. IEEETransactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1 (2019),109–118. 7, 8

[HCR∗20] HARRIS C., COOK J., REEVE R., LOVETT S., WU B.,ROBSON A., PERIM E.: Simulation.jl. https://github.com/ScottishCovidResponse/Simulation.jl, 2020. 7

[HS12] HOLME P., SARAMÄKI J.: Temporal networks. Physics Reports519, 3 (2012), 97 – 125. 8

[HT90] HUNT A., THOMAS D.: The pragmatic programmer. Addison-Wesley, 1990. 2

[ID90] INSELBERG A., DIMSDALE B.: Parallel coordinates: A tool forvisualizing multi-dimensional geometry. In Proceedings of the 1st Con-ference on Visualization ’90 (Washington, DC, USA, 1990), VIS ’90,IEEE Computer Society Press, p. 361–378. 9

[JTM∗19] JEITLER A., TURKOGLU A., MAKAROV D., JOCKERS T.,BUCHMULLER J., SCHLEGEL U., KEIM D. A.: RescueMark: VisualAnalytics of Social Media Data for Guiding Emergency Response in Dis-aster Situations: Award for Skillful Integration of Language Model. In2019 IEEE Conf. Vis. Anal. Sci. Technol. (New York, New York, USA,oct 2019), IEEE, pp. 120–121. doi:10.1109/VAST47406.2019.8986898. 2

[KCK∗19] KWON B. C., CHOI M. J., KIM J. T., CHOI E., KIM Y. B.,KWON S., SUN J., CHOO J.: RetainVis: Visual Analytics with Inter-pretable and Interactive Recurrent Neural Networks on Electronic Medi-cal Records. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graph-ics 25, 1 (2019), 299–309. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865027.2

[KcMM20] KNOLL C., ÇETIN A., MÖLLER T., MEYER M.: Extendingrecommendations for creative visualization-opportunities workshops. InIEEE Evaluation and Beyond – Methodological Approaches for Visual-ization (BELIV) (2020). 2

[KGD∗19] KERZNER E., GOODWIN S., DYKES J., JONES S., MEYERM.: A framework for creative visualization-opportunities workshops.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1(2019), 748–758. 2, 7

[KL05] KWAN M.-P., LEE J.: Emergency response after 9/11: the poten-tial of real-time 3D GIS for quick emergency response in micro-spatialenvironments. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 29, 2 (mar 2005), 93–113.doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2003.08.002. 2

[KMG∗06] KONYHA Z., MATKOVIC K., GRACANIN D., JELOVIC M.,HAUSER H.: Interactive visual analysis of families of function graphs.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 6(2006), 1373–1385. 5

[KN20] KHAN S., NGUYEN P. H.: RAMP VIS REST-fulAPI. https://github.com/ScottishCovidResponse/rampvis-api, 2020. 4

[KWS∗14] KONEV A., WASER J., SADRANSKY B., CORNEL D.,PERDIGAO R. A., HORVATH Z., GROLLER M. E.: Run Watchers: Auto-matic Simulation-Based Decision Support in Flood Management. IEEETransactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12 (dec 2014),1873–1882. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346930. 2

[Lar03] LARMAN C.: Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager’sGuide. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2003. 3

[LD11] LLOYD D., DYKES J.: Human-centered approaches in geovi-sualization design: Investigating multiple methods through a long-termcase study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics17, 12 (2011), 2498–2507. 3

[LSCK20] LOSEV T., STORTEBOOM S., CARPENDALE S., KNUDSENS.: Distributed synchronous visualization design: Challenges and strate-gies. In IEEE Evaluation and Beyond – Methodological Approaches forVisualization (BELIV) (2020). doi:arXiv:2009.02306. 2

[LTM18] LAM H., TORY M., MUNZNER T.: Bridging from goals totasks with design study analysis reports. IEEE Transactions on Vi-sualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (2018), 435–445. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744319. 2

[MBPG19] MEDOC N., BOURGOIN H., PINHEIRO P., GHONIEM M.:Using a Multi-Level and Multi-Resolution Visual Analytics Software toUnderstand the Aftermath of a Catastrophe. In 2019 IEEE Conf. Vis.Anal. Sci. Technol. (oct 2019), IEEE, pp. 138–139. doi:10.1109/VAST47406.2019.8986957. 2

[MDM16] MCCURDY N., DYKES J., MEYER M.: Action design re-search and visualization design. In IEEE Beyond Time and Errors (BE-LIV)'16 (2016), ACM, pp. 10–18. 7

[MJR∗11] MACEACHREN A. M., JAISWAL A., ROBINSON A. C.,PEZANOWSKI S., SAVELYEV A., MITRA P., ZHANG X., BLANFORDJ.: SensePlace2: GeoTwitter analytics support for situational awareness.In 2011 IEEE Conf. Vis. Anal. Sci. Technol. (oct 2011), IEEE, pp. 181–190. doi:10.1109/VAST.2011.6102456. 2

[ML17] MCNABB L., LARAMEE R. S.: Survey of Surveys (SoS) -Mapping The Landscape of Survey Papers in Information Visualiza-tion. Computer Graphics Forum 36, 3 (jun 2017), 589–617. doi:10.1111/cgf.13212. 2

[MLL∗13] MONROE M., LAN R., LEE H., PLAISANT C., SHNEIDER-MAN B.: Temporal event sequence simplification. IEEE Transactionson Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2227–2236.doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.200. 2

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

[MLR∗11] MACIEJEWSKI R., LIVENGOOD P., RUDOLPH S., COLLINST. F., EBERT D. S., BRIGANTIC R. T., CORLEY C. D., MULLERG. A., SANDERS S. W.: A pandemic influenza modeling and vi-sualization tool. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 22, 4 (aug 2011), 268–278.doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2011.04.002. 2

[MMB∗20] MOHR S., MATTHEWS L., BRETT S., MANO V., NON-WEILER J., TAKAHASHI R., TOWNSEND E.: Contact-Tracing-Model. https://github.com/ScottishCovidResponse/Contact-Tracing-Model, 2020. 8

[Mun09] MUNZNER T.: A nested model for visualization design and val-idation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15,6 (2009), 921–928. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2009.111. 2, 3, 10

[MWK14] MIRZARGAR M., WHITAKER R. T., KIRBY R. M.: Curveboxplot: Generalization of boxplot for ensembles of curves. IEEE Trans-actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12 (2014), 2654–2663. 9

[ND19] NGUYEN H. N., DANG T.: EQSA: Earthquake Situational An-alytics from Social Media. In 2019 IEEE Conf. Vis. Anal. Sci. Technol.(oct 2019), IEEE, pp. 142–143. doi:10.1109/VAST47406.2019.8986947. 2

[NG09] NATARAJAN S., GANZ A.: Distributed visual analytics for col-laborative emergency response management. In 2009 Annu. Int. Conf.IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (sep 2009), IEEE, pp. 1714–1717. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333481. 2

[NKA20] NGUYEN P. H., KHAN S., ABDUL-RAHMAN A.:RAMP VIS User Interface. https://github.com/ScottishCovidResponse/rampvis-ui, 2020. 4

[PFZ20] PORPHYRE T., FOX P., ZAREBSKI K.: Covid19_EERAModel.https://github.com/ScottishCovidResponse/Covid19_EERAModel, 2020. 9

[PL20] PREIM B., LAWONN K.: A Survey of Visual Analytics for PublicHealth. Comput. Graph. Forum 39, 1 (feb 2020), 543–580. doi:10.1111/cgf.13891. 2

[RAM20] RAMP VIS: Visualization and visual analytics in support ofrapid assistance in modelling the pandemic (ramp). https://sites.google.com/view/rampvis, 2020. 1

[RHR16] ROBERTS J. C., HEADLEAND C., RITSOS P. D.: Sketchingdesigns using the five design-sheet methodology. IEEE Transactions onVisualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2016), 419–428. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467271. 2, 9, 10

[RWA∗13] RIND A., WANG T. D., AIGNER W., MIKSCH S., WONG-SUPHASAWAT K., PLAISANT C., SHNEIDERMAN B.: Interactive Infor-mation Visualization to Explore and Query Electronic Health Records.Found. Trends® Human–Computer Interact. 5, 3 (2013), 207–298.doi:10.1561/1100000039. 2

[RWG∗12] RIBICIC H., WASER J., GURBAT R., SADRANSKY B.,GROLLER M. E.: Sketching Uncertainty into Simulations. IEEE Trans-actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 12 (dec 2012),2255–2264. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.261. 2

[SAK18] SIMONETTO P., ARCHAMBAULT D., KOBOUROV S.: Drawingdynamic graphs without timeslices. In Graph Drawing and NetworkVisualization (GD ’17) (2018), pp. 394–409. 8

[SAK20] SIMONETTO P., ARCHAMBAULT D., KOBOUROV S.: Event-based dynamic graph visualisation. IEEE Transactions on Visualizationand Computer Graphics 26, 7 (2020), 2373–2386. 8

[Sli18] SLINGSBY A.: Tilemaps for summarising multivariate geograph-ical variation. VIS 2018 (Poster) (2018). 7

[SMM12] SEDLMAIR M., MEYER M., MUNZNER T.: Design studymethodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE Trans-actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 12 (2012), 2431–2440. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.213. 2

[SMR∗20] SYEDA U. H., MURALI P., ROE L., BERKEY B., BORKINM. A.: Design study “lite” methodology: Expediting design studies and

enabling the synergy of visualization pedagogy and social good. In Pro-ceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in ComputingSystems (2020), CHI ’20, p. 1–13. 2

[SSBC19] SULTANUM N., SINGH D., BRUDNO M., CHEVALIER F.:Doccurate: A Curation-Based Approach for Clinical Text Visualiza-tion. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25,1 (2019), 142–151. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864905. 2

[TAX∗20] TURKAY C., ARCHAMBAULT D., XU K., MOHR S.,MATTHEWS L.: Contact tracing visualizations. https://github.com/ScottishCovidResponse/scrc-vis-modelling/tree/master/ContactTracing, 2020. 8

[TFA∗11] TAM G. K., FANG H., AUBREY A. J., GRANT P. W., ROSINP. L., MARSHALL D., CHEN M.: Visualization of time-series data inparameter space for understanding facial dynamics. Computer GraphicsForum 30, 3 (2011), 901–910. 9

[The14] THE WHITE HOUSE, OFFICE OF THE PRESS SEC-RETARY: Remarks by the president on research for po-tential ebola vaccines. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/12/02/remarks-president-research-potential-ebola-vaccines,2014. 10

[The20a] THE ROYAL SOCIETY: Rapid assistance in modelling the pan-demic: Ramp. https://epcced.github.io/ramp/, 2020. 1,2

[The20b] THE SCOTTISH COVID-19 RESPONSE CONSORTIUM: Homepage. https://www.gla.ac.uk/research/az/scrc/, 2020.1, 2

[The20c] THE SCOTTISH COVID-19 RESPONSE CON-SORTIUM: Repositories. https://github.com/ScottishCovidResponse, 2020. 4

[TKE16] THOM D., KRUGER R., ERTL T.: Can Twitter Save Lives? ABroad-Scale Study on Visual Social Media Analytics for Public Safety.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 7 (jul2016), 1816–1829. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2015.2511733. 2

[TPC∗18] TRIVEDI G., PHAM P., CHAPMAN W. W., HWA R., WIEBEJ., HOCHHEISER H.: NLPReViz: An interactive tool for natural lan-guage processing on clinical text. J. Am. Med. Informatics Assoc. 25, 1(jan 2018), 81–87. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocx070. 2

[TWSM17] TORSNEY-WEIR T., SEDLMAIR M., MÖLLER T.: Slice-plorer: 1d slices for multi-dimensional continuous functions. ComputerGraphics Forum 36, 3 (2017), 167–177. 9

[VAS10] VAST Challenge 2010 MC2 - Characterization of Pan-demic Spread, 2010. URL: https://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/varepository/VASTChallenge2010/challenges/MC2-CharacterizationofPandemicSpread/. 2

[VAS11a] VAST Challenge 2011 MC1 - Characterization of anEpidemic Spread, 2011. URL: http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/varepository/VASTChallenge2011/challenges/MC1-CharacterizationofanEpidemicSpread/. 2

[VAS11b] VAST Challenge 2011 MC3 - Investigation into Ter-rorist Activity, 2011. URL: https://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/varepository/VASTChallenge2011/challenges/MC3-InvestigationintoTerroristActivity/. 2

[VAS16a] VAST Challenge 2016 MC1, 2016. URL: https://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/varepository/VASTChallenge2016/challenges/Mini-Challenge1/. 2

[VAS16b] VAST Challenge 2016 MC2, 2016. URL: https://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/varepository/VASTChallenge2016/challenges/Mini-Challenge2/. 2

[VAS16c] VAST Challenge 2016 MC3, 2016. URL: https://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/varepository/VASTChallenge2016/challenges/Mini-Challenge3/. 2

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

M. Chen et al. / RAMPVIS: Visualisation Capabilities for Large-scale Emergency Responses

[VAS18a] VAST Challenge 2018 MC2, 2018. URL: https://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/varepository/VASTChallenge2018/challenges/Mini-Challenge2/. 2

[VAS18b] VAST Challenge 2018 MC3, 2018. URL: https://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/varepository/VASTChallenge2018/challenges/Mini-Challenge3/. 2

[VAS19] VAST Challenge 2019, 2019. URL: https://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/varepository/VASTChallenge2019/challenges/GrandChallenge/. 2

[WBD14] WOOD J., BEECHAM R., DYKES J.: Moving beyond sequen-tial design: Reflections on a rich multi-channel approach to data visual-ization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20,12 (2014), 2171–2180. 8

[WGP∗11] WONGSUPHASAWAT K., GUERRA GÓMEZ J. A.,PLAISANT C., WANG T. D., TAIEB-MAIMON M., SHNEIDER-MAN B.: LifeFlow: Visualizing an Overview of Event Sequences.In Proc. 2011 Annu. Conf. Hum. factors Comput. Syst. - CHI’11 (New York, New York, USA, 2011), ACM Press, p. 1747.doi:10.1145/1978942.1979196. 2

[WHWC12] WICKHAM H., HOFMANN H., WICKHAM C., COOKD.: Glyph-maps for visually exploring temporal patterns in cli-mate data and models. Environmetrics 23, 5 (2012), 382–393.URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/env.2152, arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/env.2152, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2152. 7

[WMK13] WHITAKER R. T., MIRZARGAR M., KIRBY R. M.: Contourboxplots: A method for characterizing uncertainty in feature sets fromsimulation ensembles. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Com-puter Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2713–2722. 9

[WRF∗11] WASER J., RIBICIC H., FUCHS R., HIRSCH C., SCHINDLERB., BLOSCHL G., GROLLER M. E.: Nodes on Ropes: A Comprehen-sive Data and Control Flow for Steering Ensemble Simulations. IEEETransactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (dec 2011),1872–1881. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2011.225. 2

[WWS19] WHITLOCK M., WU K., SZAFIR D. A.: Designing for Mo-bile and Immersive Visual Analytics in the Field. IEEE Transactions onVisualization and Computer Graphics (2019), 1–1. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934282. 2

[ZAR∗11] ZHANG Z., AHMED F., RAMAKRISHNAN A. M. I. V., ZHAOR., VICCELLIO A., MUELLER K.: AnamneVis: a framework for thevisualization of patient history and medical diagnostics chains. IEEEVAHC Work., January (2011), 1–4. 2

© 2020 The Author(s)Computer Graphics Forum © 2020 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.