Ramesh 10

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    1/28

    POST WTO AGRICULTURE TRADE,FOOD SECURITYAND AGENDA FORAGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS

    Ramesh Chand

    National Centre for AgriculturalEconomics and Policy ResearchNew Delhi 110012

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    2/28

    IMPORTANCE OF

    AGRICULTURE IN SACCountry Ag share in

    GDP %Ag share inemployment %

    Bangladesh 21 62

    India 22 58

    Nepal 39 76

    Pakistan 23 42

    Sri Lanka 19 35

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    3/28

    Ref. Bangla- India Nepal Paki- Sri

    Particular Year desh stan Lanka

    Per capita GNP $ 2002 380 495 230 420 850

    Income rank in the world 2002 171 161 191 168 142

    Arable land: ha. per capita 1999-01 0.06 0.16 0.13 0.15 0.05Agri. value added/worker '95 $ 2000-02 318 401 203 716 725

    Poverty % Late 1990s

    Rural 53 30 44 36 27

    Urban 37 25 23 24 15

    Undernourished population % 1999-01 32 21 17 19 25

    SELECTED SOCIO ECONOMIC INDICATORS OF SAC

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    4/28

    WHAT AGENDA FOR TRADENEGOTIATIONS ON AOA? Experience during post WTO decade

    Difference between expectations and reality

    Food security: Self sufficiency and Self Reliance

    Changes in dependence on food imports

    Trade orientation of agriculture

    Agricultural growth in South Asian Countries before

    and after WTO

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    5/28

    EXPERIENCE AND IMPACT

    Period: 1991 to 2002

    Three sub periods: Liberalisation

    phases and price phasesPeriod Years Int. price index

    Pre WTO 1991 to 1994 97.6

    Initial WTO years 1995 to 1998 106.0

    Post WTO 1999 to 2002 91.8

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    6/28

    Index of International Agril. Price base 1990=100

    60.0

    70.0

    80.0

    90.0

    100.0

    110.0

    120.0

    1973

    1975

    1977

    1979

    1981

    1983

    1985

    1987

    1989

    1991

    1993

    1995

    1997

    1999

    2001

    Year

    Price

    index

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    7/28

    IMPORT DEPENDENCE FOR MAJOR FOOD PRODUCTS

    Country Wheat Rice Sugar & Pulses Veg. Oils Vegetable Fruits Milk

    India

    1991 to 1994 0.8 0.2 2.3 4.5 5.7 0.0 0.4 0.1

    1995 to 1998 1.7 0.1 1.6 6.1 24.4 0.0 0.6 0.01999 to 2002 0.6 0.1 1.4 10.7 47.9 0.1 0.7 0.1

    Pakistan

    1991 to 1994 13.0 0.2 6.0 22.7 98.0 0.8 1.3 0.7

    1995 to 1998 14.3 0.1 6.3 20.9 95.4 2.0 2.1 0.5

    1999 to 2002 6.4 0.3 12.9 36.4 88.4 2.6 3.2 0.4

    Sri Lanka

    1991 to 1994 100.8 9.0 76.0 60.2 101.4 10.5 1.6 49.2

    1995 to 1998 104.7 11.4 89.1 79.4 166.2 17.3 3.5 57.9

    1999 to 2002 103.0 5.1 98.9 94.3 199.1 21.2 6.9 64.3

    Nepal

    1991 to 1994 1.3 1.9 26.7 11.8 58.1 0.2 1.0 1.7

    1995 to 1998 0.7 2.0 23.7 4.3 62.2 2.6 1.1 0.2

    1999 to 2002 1.3 3.3 29.4 11.2 89.5 0.4 1.9 1.4

    Bangladesh

    1991 to 1994 54.6 0.2 7.3 12.1 70.5 5.9 2.4 16.4

    1995 to 1998 48.6 4.4 15.3 8.1 95.6 2.9 6.8 11.7

    1999 to 2002 62.4 4.0 33.0 25.0 120.5 3.8 8.6 18.3

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    8/28

    DEPENDENCE ON IMPORT FOR FOOD: AGGREGATE

    Country 1991 to1994 1995 to1998 1999 to 2002

    India 0.89 2.02 3.76

    Pakistan 8.46 8.12 7.45

    Bangladesh 9.20 13.57 17.87

    Sri Lanka 34.47 41.08 43.24

    Nepal 2.89 2.93 4.87

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    9/28

    FOOD DEPENDENCE ON IMPORT:

    IMPLICATIONS

    Liberalisation implies increase, that is obvious

    What matters is change in self reliance: Whether SR improved

    Deteriorated

    Remained unchanged

    This can be seen from changes in Net TradeIf dX>dM Improvement in self reliance

    If dX

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    10/28

    Country 1991 to 1994 1995-1998 1999-2002

    Million $ Before WTO Start of WTO After WTO

    High prices Low prices

    Bangladesh

    Export 128 139 105

    Import 663 1248 1623

    Net Trade -535 -1109 -1518

    India

    Export 3085 5557 5087

    Import 1336 2711 3699

    Net Trade 1749 2846 1388

    Nepal

    Export 49 48 58

    Import 141 217 194

    Net Trade -92 -169 -136

    Pakistan

    Export 956 1101 1067Import 1405 2135 1814

    Net Trade -448 -1034 -747

    Sri Lanka

    Export 528 923 969

    Import 500 779 766

    Net Trade 29 144 202

    AGRI. TRADE OF SAC BEFORE AND AFTER WTO

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    11/28

    exports required to finance import

    Country Aspect 1991 to 1994 1995 to 1998 1999 to 2002

    India Net trade/GDP % 2.2 2.9 1.3

    Import/Export % 43.3 48.8 72.7

    Bangladesh Net trade/GDP % -6.3 -11.7 -12.5

    Import/Export % 518.0 900.6 1547.6

    Nepal Net trade/GDP % -6.0 -9.9 -7.1

    Import/Export % 288.2 452.8 332.7

    Pakistan Net trade/GDP % -4.4 -7.7 -5.0

    Import/Export % 146.9 193.9 170.1

    Sri Lanka Net trade/GDP % 1.4 5.4 7.0

    Import/Export % 94.6 84.4 79.1

    Self reliance in agri revealed by ratio of net trade to GDP and ratio of

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    12/28

    IMPACT OF TRADE LIBERALISATION ON SELF RELIANCE FOR FOO

    International Price PhaseCountry High Low

    Bangladesh Deteriorate Deteriorate

    India Improve Deteriorate

    Nepal Deteriorate Deteriorate

    Pakistan Deteriorate Deteriorate

    Sri Lanka Improve Improve

    Adverse impact would have been far greater if trade was free

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    13/28

    IMPORTANT LESSONS

    Trade liberalisation reduced self reliance onfood for all countries except Sri Lanka

    If SACs had not taken protective measuresand allowed free trade then self reliance onfood would have gone very low

    Need to keep check on import if liberalisationdoes not improve export to pay for import

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    14/28

    TRADE ORIENTATION OF AGRICULTURE: TRADE/GDP RATIO

    Country Trade 1991-1994 1995 to 1998 1999 to 2002

    India Import 1.7 2.8 3.7

    Export 3.9 5.7 5.2Total trade 5.6 8.4 8.9

    Bangladesh Import 7.8 13.2 12.9

    Export 1.5 1.5 0.8

    Total trade 9.3 14.6 13.7

    Nepal Import 9.1 12.7 8.8

    Export 3.2 2.8 2.9

    Total trade 12.3 15.5 11.7

    Pakistan Import 13.7 15.9 10.8

    Export 9.3 8.2 7.1Total trade 23.1 24.0 17.9

    Sri Lanka Import 25.1 29.5 26.8

    Export 26.5 34.9 30.3

    Total trade 51.6 64.4 57.1

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    15/28

    INFERENCE

    o Share of export in GDP declined for allcountries except India in post WTO period

    compared with pre WTO years

    o Reason: Market access in developed

    countries did not improve

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    16/28

    Instability in domestic and international prices during 1991 to 2002

    Bangla- India Nepal Paki- Sri Inter

    Commodity desh stan Lanka nationalRice 0.124 0.126 0.129 0.077 0.099 0.145

    Maize 0.122 0.055 0.148 0.105 0.117 0.177

    Wheat 0.122 0.064 0.064 0.093 0.163

    Groundnut 0.051 0.102 0.125 0.088 0.198

    Rapeseed 0.135 0.086 0.181

    Coconut 0.279 0.195 0.227 0.266

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    17/28

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    18/28

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    19/28

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    20/28

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    21/28

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    22/28

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    23/28

    Fig 1: Grow th rate in GDP agri.

    Bangladesh, 1992 to 2003

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    Fig 2: Growth rate in GDP Agri. India, 1992

    to 2003

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    Fig 4: Growth rate in GDP agri, Pakistan,

    1992 to 2003

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    Fig 5: Growth rate in GDP agri, Sri lanka,

    1992 to 2003

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    24/28

    Fig 3:Growth rate in GDP agri in Nepal 1992to 2003

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    25/28

    FOOD SECURITY ISSUES AND

    TRADE LIBERALISATION

    Should food security be based on self reliancerather than self sufficiency:

    Yes, at country level

    At household level: Yes, if volatility in internationalprices can be absorbed by consumers

    Food share in expenditure and magnitude of volatility

    Prospects of diversification and trade-off withexports

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    26/28

    IMPORTANT LESSONS FROM

    WTO AGREEMENT

    Initial post WTO years generally not adverse

    After 1998 as international prices declined:Agricultural exports declinedImports increased contrary to global trend

    Agriculture growth rate adversely affected

    Important lessons from this experience:In Import:

    Moderate tariffs are inadequate to guard against volatilitySACs need either very high bound tariff or special safeguards to

    regulate imports of sensitive products

    In exports:Seek better market accessSSG in developed countriesSome have variable tariffSPS measures

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    27/28

    FUTURE STRASTEGY OF SAC

    Seek phasing out of measures that distortinternational prices

    Reasonable protection for their market.

    Seek more market access in developedcountriesmarkets

    Weigh special product gains against

    sensitive product to othersExamine the cost of delay in concluding new

    round

  • 7/29/2019 Ramesh 10

    28/28

    ThankYou