Upload
ameydalvi91
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
1/28
POST WTO AGRICULTURE TRADE,FOOD SECURITYAND AGENDA FORAGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS
Ramesh Chand
National Centre for AgriculturalEconomics and Policy ResearchNew Delhi 110012
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
2/28
IMPORTANCE OF
AGRICULTURE IN SACCountry Ag share in
GDP %Ag share inemployment %
Bangladesh 21 62
India 22 58
Nepal 39 76
Pakistan 23 42
Sri Lanka 19 35
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
3/28
Ref. Bangla- India Nepal Paki- Sri
Particular Year desh stan Lanka
Per capita GNP $ 2002 380 495 230 420 850
Income rank in the world 2002 171 161 191 168 142
Arable land: ha. per capita 1999-01 0.06 0.16 0.13 0.15 0.05Agri. value added/worker '95 $ 2000-02 318 401 203 716 725
Poverty % Late 1990s
Rural 53 30 44 36 27
Urban 37 25 23 24 15
Undernourished population % 1999-01 32 21 17 19 25
SELECTED SOCIO ECONOMIC INDICATORS OF SAC
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
4/28
WHAT AGENDA FOR TRADENEGOTIATIONS ON AOA? Experience during post WTO decade
Difference between expectations and reality
Food security: Self sufficiency and Self Reliance
Changes in dependence on food imports
Trade orientation of agriculture
Agricultural growth in South Asian Countries before
and after WTO
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
5/28
EXPERIENCE AND IMPACT
Period: 1991 to 2002
Three sub periods: Liberalisation
phases and price phasesPeriod Years Int. price index
Pre WTO 1991 to 1994 97.6
Initial WTO years 1995 to 1998 106.0
Post WTO 1999 to 2002 91.8
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
6/28
Index of International Agril. Price base 1990=100
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
110.0
120.0
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
Year
Price
index
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
7/28
IMPORT DEPENDENCE FOR MAJOR FOOD PRODUCTS
Country Wheat Rice Sugar & Pulses Veg. Oils Vegetable Fruits Milk
India
1991 to 1994 0.8 0.2 2.3 4.5 5.7 0.0 0.4 0.1
1995 to 1998 1.7 0.1 1.6 6.1 24.4 0.0 0.6 0.01999 to 2002 0.6 0.1 1.4 10.7 47.9 0.1 0.7 0.1
Pakistan
1991 to 1994 13.0 0.2 6.0 22.7 98.0 0.8 1.3 0.7
1995 to 1998 14.3 0.1 6.3 20.9 95.4 2.0 2.1 0.5
1999 to 2002 6.4 0.3 12.9 36.4 88.4 2.6 3.2 0.4
Sri Lanka
1991 to 1994 100.8 9.0 76.0 60.2 101.4 10.5 1.6 49.2
1995 to 1998 104.7 11.4 89.1 79.4 166.2 17.3 3.5 57.9
1999 to 2002 103.0 5.1 98.9 94.3 199.1 21.2 6.9 64.3
Nepal
1991 to 1994 1.3 1.9 26.7 11.8 58.1 0.2 1.0 1.7
1995 to 1998 0.7 2.0 23.7 4.3 62.2 2.6 1.1 0.2
1999 to 2002 1.3 3.3 29.4 11.2 89.5 0.4 1.9 1.4
Bangladesh
1991 to 1994 54.6 0.2 7.3 12.1 70.5 5.9 2.4 16.4
1995 to 1998 48.6 4.4 15.3 8.1 95.6 2.9 6.8 11.7
1999 to 2002 62.4 4.0 33.0 25.0 120.5 3.8 8.6 18.3
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
8/28
DEPENDENCE ON IMPORT FOR FOOD: AGGREGATE
Country 1991 to1994 1995 to1998 1999 to 2002
India 0.89 2.02 3.76
Pakistan 8.46 8.12 7.45
Bangladesh 9.20 13.57 17.87
Sri Lanka 34.47 41.08 43.24
Nepal 2.89 2.93 4.87
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
9/28
FOOD DEPENDENCE ON IMPORT:
IMPLICATIONS
Liberalisation implies increase, that is obvious
What matters is change in self reliance: Whether SR improved
Deteriorated
Remained unchanged
This can be seen from changes in Net TradeIf dX>dM Improvement in self reliance
If dX
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
10/28
Country 1991 to 1994 1995-1998 1999-2002
Million $ Before WTO Start of WTO After WTO
High prices Low prices
Bangladesh
Export 128 139 105
Import 663 1248 1623
Net Trade -535 -1109 -1518
India
Export 3085 5557 5087
Import 1336 2711 3699
Net Trade 1749 2846 1388
Nepal
Export 49 48 58
Import 141 217 194
Net Trade -92 -169 -136
Pakistan
Export 956 1101 1067Import 1405 2135 1814
Net Trade -448 -1034 -747
Sri Lanka
Export 528 923 969
Import 500 779 766
Net Trade 29 144 202
AGRI. TRADE OF SAC BEFORE AND AFTER WTO
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
11/28
exports required to finance import
Country Aspect 1991 to 1994 1995 to 1998 1999 to 2002
India Net trade/GDP % 2.2 2.9 1.3
Import/Export % 43.3 48.8 72.7
Bangladesh Net trade/GDP % -6.3 -11.7 -12.5
Import/Export % 518.0 900.6 1547.6
Nepal Net trade/GDP % -6.0 -9.9 -7.1
Import/Export % 288.2 452.8 332.7
Pakistan Net trade/GDP % -4.4 -7.7 -5.0
Import/Export % 146.9 193.9 170.1
Sri Lanka Net trade/GDP % 1.4 5.4 7.0
Import/Export % 94.6 84.4 79.1
Self reliance in agri revealed by ratio of net trade to GDP and ratio of
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
12/28
IMPACT OF TRADE LIBERALISATION ON SELF RELIANCE FOR FOO
International Price PhaseCountry High Low
Bangladesh Deteriorate Deteriorate
India Improve Deteriorate
Nepal Deteriorate Deteriorate
Pakistan Deteriorate Deteriorate
Sri Lanka Improve Improve
Adverse impact would have been far greater if trade was free
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
13/28
IMPORTANT LESSONS
Trade liberalisation reduced self reliance onfood for all countries except Sri Lanka
If SACs had not taken protective measuresand allowed free trade then self reliance onfood would have gone very low
Need to keep check on import if liberalisationdoes not improve export to pay for import
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
14/28
TRADE ORIENTATION OF AGRICULTURE: TRADE/GDP RATIO
Country Trade 1991-1994 1995 to 1998 1999 to 2002
India Import 1.7 2.8 3.7
Export 3.9 5.7 5.2Total trade 5.6 8.4 8.9
Bangladesh Import 7.8 13.2 12.9
Export 1.5 1.5 0.8
Total trade 9.3 14.6 13.7
Nepal Import 9.1 12.7 8.8
Export 3.2 2.8 2.9
Total trade 12.3 15.5 11.7
Pakistan Import 13.7 15.9 10.8
Export 9.3 8.2 7.1Total trade 23.1 24.0 17.9
Sri Lanka Import 25.1 29.5 26.8
Export 26.5 34.9 30.3
Total trade 51.6 64.4 57.1
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
15/28
INFERENCE
o Share of export in GDP declined for allcountries except India in post WTO period
compared with pre WTO years
o Reason: Market access in developed
countries did not improve
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
16/28
Instability in domestic and international prices during 1991 to 2002
Bangla- India Nepal Paki- Sri Inter
Commodity desh stan Lanka nationalRice 0.124 0.126 0.129 0.077 0.099 0.145
Maize 0.122 0.055 0.148 0.105 0.117 0.177
Wheat 0.122 0.064 0.064 0.093 0.163
Groundnut 0.051 0.102 0.125 0.088 0.198
Rapeseed 0.135 0.086 0.181
Coconut 0.279 0.195 0.227 0.266
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
17/28
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
18/28
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
19/28
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
20/28
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
21/28
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
22/28
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
23/28
Fig 1: Grow th rate in GDP agri.
Bangladesh, 1992 to 2003
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Fig 2: Growth rate in GDP Agri. India, 1992
to 2003
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Fig 4: Growth rate in GDP agri, Pakistan,
1992 to 2003
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Fig 5: Growth rate in GDP agri, Sri lanka,
1992 to 2003
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
24/28
Fig 3:Growth rate in GDP agri in Nepal 1992to 2003
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
25/28
FOOD SECURITY ISSUES AND
TRADE LIBERALISATION
Should food security be based on self reliancerather than self sufficiency:
Yes, at country level
At household level: Yes, if volatility in internationalprices can be absorbed by consumers
Food share in expenditure and magnitude of volatility
Prospects of diversification and trade-off withexports
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
26/28
IMPORTANT LESSONS FROM
WTO AGREEMENT
Initial post WTO years generally not adverse
After 1998 as international prices declined:Agricultural exports declinedImports increased contrary to global trend
Agriculture growth rate adversely affected
Important lessons from this experience:In Import:
Moderate tariffs are inadequate to guard against volatilitySACs need either very high bound tariff or special safeguards to
regulate imports of sensitive products
In exports:Seek better market accessSSG in developed countriesSome have variable tariffSPS measures
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
27/28
FUTURE STRASTEGY OF SAC
Seek phasing out of measures that distortinternational prices
Reasonable protection for their market.
Seek more market access in developedcountriesmarkets
Weigh special product gains against
sensitive product to othersExamine the cost of delay in concluding new
round
7/29/2019 Ramesh 10
28/28
ThankYou