Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    1/32

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    2/32

    Radiation Hazard : Biological Effects and

    Dose LimitsEvaluation : Assessment of hazard

    Control: Methods of reducinghazard below thedose limits

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    3/32

    Nature of effect :

    Deterministic effect

    Probabilistic effect

    Who is affected :Exposed individual (somatic)

    Progeny of exposed person

    (hereditary)When effect appears:Immediate (hours days)

    Delayed (months years)

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    4/32

    BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OFRADIATION

    Deterministic effects:

    Temporary Sterility

    NVD

    Epilation

    Skin burn

    Cataract

    Lethality

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    5/32

    BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OFRADIATION (CONTD.)

    Probabilistic effects: Cancer

    Leukaemia Hereditary effect

    No threshold dose

    is defined !!

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    6/32

    Determination of the radiation hazard

    that may result from exposure toradiation.

    Assessment of the dose received by the

    exposed persons

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    7/32

    Safety and security of sources

    Protection of personnel and public Safe work practices

    .

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    8/32

    Internal Exposure

    -Resulting from intake of radioactivematerial

    External Exposure-Resulting from source outsidethe human body

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    9/32

    Entry of radioactive material intothe body

    Inhalation Ingestion InjectionSource of radiation inside the

    exposed person. Source hasto be flushed out of the body.

    Working with sealed sourcesunlikely to cause internalexposure.

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    10/32

    Source outside the exposed person Exposure ceases as the source is

    removed Shielding interposed between source and

    exposed person can reduce the dose

    Working with sealed sources likely tocause external exposure.

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    11/32

    Alpha has a range of a few cm in air.

    Beta has a range of a few cm in Al /

    perspex Gamma can penetrate great distances

    Hazard Alpha Beta Gamma

    External Nil Not high Very high

    Internal Very high Very high High

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    12/32

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    13/32

    Personnel monitoring TLD, Pocket dosimeter

    Record total dose (mSv)

    Area monitoringSurvey meter (e.g. GM survey meter)

    Display dose-rate (mSv/h or mR/h)

    Contamination monitorDisplay reading in Bq/cm2

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    14/32

    INTERNAL EXPOSURE &

    SEALED SOURCES

    Working with sealed sources unlikely

    to cause internal exposure.

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    15/32

    External hazard from alpha radiation is nil.

    External hazard from beta not severe

    External hazard from gamma can besevere

    Working with sealed sources likely to

    cause external exposure.

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    16/32

    Source mGyh-1 GBq-1 Rh-1 Ci-1

    60 Co 0.31 1.32137Cs 0.07 0.3131I 0.05 0.22203Hg 0.03 0.1324Na 0.42 1.84

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    17/32

    Time Distance

    Shielding Activity limitNucleonic gauges are designed to meet stringent

    safety standards. Dose-rate on the exterior is

    low.Individual monitoring not recommended.

    Area monitoring necessary.

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    18/32

    Reduce period of exposure to radiation toreduce the dose received from source.

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    19/32

    Increase distance from source to decreaseexposure-rate.

    I1 d12

    = I2 d22

    Double the distance from the source;dose-rate falls to the original value.

    Halve the distance from the source; dose-rate increase to 4 times the original value.

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    20/32

    HVT reduces dose-rate to half the original value.

    TVT reduces dose-rate to a tenth of the original value.

    .Source 16 mSv/h8 mSv/h

    0.4 mSv/h

    1 HVL

    4 mSv/h2 HVL

    1 TVL+2 HVLHVL = HVTTVL = TVT

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    21/32

    Exposure-rate at 1 m from a gammasource = Activity x gamma ray constant

    X = q x GRC Sv/h

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    22/32

    For beta and gamma = 4 Bq per sq. cm

    For alpha = 0.4 Bq per sq. cm

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    23/32

    High Z shielding of beta radiation givesrise to bremsstrahlung radiation

    Ideal beta shields are perspex and Al

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    24/32

    High electron density materials are suitable formost of the gamma sources

    Lead, concrete, depleted uranium-------------------------------------------------------HVL TVL

    Source cm Pb cm Pb

    -------------------------------------------------------60Co 1.2 4

    137 Cs 0.7 2.2

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    25/32

    Neutron sources commonly used in industrialprocess control (e.g. moisture content in coke infurnaces) and well logging are 252Cf and 241Am-

    Be. Fast neutron flux of 3.7 n cm-2 s-1 corresponds toa dose-rate of 10 Sv /h.

    Hydrogenous materials like paraffin are used for

    shielding neutrons. Such materials slow downfast neutrons which are then absorbed by boronreleasing particles detected by conventionalradiation detectors.

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    26/32

    Procure only gauges approved by AERB

    Ensure safety and security of sourceduring use and storage Maintenance by authorized service

    engineer

    Shutter OFF when not in use Minimize occupancy near installation

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    27/32

    Procure and use area monitors

    Generally individual monitoring recommendedonly for well-logging personnel

    Maintain a logbook of operations Handle emergency carefully (time, distance,

    shielding) and inform AERB immediately.

    After useful life, source should be sent fordisposal with permission from AERB.

    Never keep a source that you do not need.

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    28/32

    To reduce the dose to the individual- Reduce the time of exposure

    Increase the distance from the source Interpose a shielding material between

    source and expose person

    Limit the activity handled

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    29/32

    Exposure-rate at 1 m from a gammasource = Activity x gamma ray constant

    X = q x GRC Sv/h

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    30/32

    Example set 11. What is the exposure-rate at 1 m from a cobalt 60 source of activity 220

    GBq?

    q = 220 GBq

    GRC for cobalt 60 = 0.31 mGy h-1GBq-1 at 1 m

    Dose rate at 1 m = q x GRC mGy / h

    = 220 x 0.31 mGy / h= 68.2 mGy / h

    2. What will be dose received by a person who spends five hours at 1 mfrom the source?

    Dose received = dose-rate x period of exposure

    Dose received = 68.2 mGy/h x 5 hours

    = 341 mGy

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    31/32

    Example set 2

    3. At 1 m from a 60Co source the dose-rate is 62 mGy/h. What is the

    activity of the source?

    Let the activity be q GBq.

    Dose rate at 1 m from the source = q x 0.31 mGy/h

    i.e. q x 0.31 = 62 mGy/hq = 200 GBq

    4. A person spent 7 hours at a place. His TLD recorded a total dose of 840 mGy.

    What is the dose-rate at the place?

    5. The dose-rate at1

    m from a source is 40 mGy/h. What is the dose-rate at 2m?6. The dose-rate at 2 m from a source is 36 mGy/h. What is the dose-rate at 3 m?

    7. The dose-rate at 5 m from a source is 225 mGy/h. What is the dose-rate at 3 m?

  • 8/6/2019 Radiation Hazard evaluation and Controls

    32/32

    Example set 38. What is the distance required to reduce the dose rate from a

    137

    Cssource of activity 50 GBq to 0.1 mGy/h?

    I1 = q x GRC mGy/h d1 = 1 m

    I2 = 0.1 mGy/h d2 = ?

    The GRC of137Cs is 0.072 mGy/h per GBq at 1 m.

    9. What is the thickness of lead required for a storage container housing

    a 60Co source of activity 6.5 GBq so that at 1 m from the source position, the

    dose rate does not exceed 0.01 mSv/h?

    Dose-rate at 1 m from the source without shielding = 6.5 x 0.31 mSv/h = 2 mSv/h

    Shielding required to reduce this dose-rate to 0.01 mSv/h is 2 TVL + 1 HVL

    Lead shielding thickness = 2 x 4 + 1.2 = 9.2 cm

    10. Can a 137Cs of activity 13, 500 GBq be stored in the above container without

    exceeding the dose limit of 0.01 mSv/h at 1 m from the source position ?