Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
William Schaeffer & Sarah Cotts UV/EB West
February 26 & 27, 2013
“Radiation Curable Components and Their Use
in Corrosion Resistant Applications"
Outline of Discussion Topics Economic Impact of Corrosion Types of Chemistry Commonly Used Industry Trend Corrosion Resistance Test Methods Oligomer Performance as it Relates to Backbone
Structure Monomer Performance as it Relates to Functionality Effect of Film Thickness on Corrosion Protection The Importance of Corrosion Inhibiting Pigments (CIP) Weather Resistance Test Results Conclusions & Observations Made Based on this Study
Economic Impact of Metallic Corrosion Across U.S. Sectors, Cost of Damage, $276 Billion (Federal Highway Administration Survey, 2000)
Typical Chemistries Currently Used
These range from alkyd and epoxy ester coatings that are baked or air dried to promote crosslinking.
Solvent-borne two-part coatings employing polyurethanes or latexes based on vinyl, acrylic or styrene combinations.
Water based compositions, including aqueous alkyds, epoxy esters, polyesters, and polyurethanes.
High solids or powder coatings based on vinyl, polyester, or epoxy ester compositions are also favorable alternatives.
Industrial Market Technology Distribution, 2004, 58 MM Gallons
Market Distribution of Technologies for Direct to Metal Applications
Typical Metal Applications Now Using Radiation Cured Coatings to Provide Corrosion or Processing Protection
Examples of Poor Corrosion Resistance
The most widely used corrosion control technique. Means for separating the surfaces that are susceptible
to corrosion from the factors in the environment which cause corrosion to occur.
Can be used in combination with other methods of corrosion protection Cathodic Protection Corrosion Inhibitors
Can be used as a primer, secondary, topcoat, or combination
Protective Coatings
How Do Coatings Protect Metal? 3 Basic Mechanisms
More than one of these mechanisms may be used by a coating Barrier Protection
Organic coatings act as a barrier to a corrosive solution or electrolyte Forming a barrier relatively impermeable to moisture The barrier should be as impermeable, thick, and continuous as practical.
Cathodic Protection High loading of fine zinc particles, so the particles in the cured film are in
electrical contact with each other and with the underlying steel. This permits a type of cathodic protection.
Organic and inorganic products are used for zinc-rich coatings on steel Inhibitive Pigments
Added to primers to inhibit corrosion at the coating/metal interface.
Corrosion Resistant Testing Ongoing project to understand
(meth)acrylate monomer and oligomer performance in ASTM B117 Salt/Fog Testing Ability to withstand corrosive environment Protect metal surface from corrosion
Testing focused on cold rolled steel (CRS) Common construction and durable good
component Substrate very susceptible to corrosion
Salt/Fog Testing ASTM B117 Test protocol
5% NaCl solution pH of 6.5 to 7.2 Temperature set to
35 °C Fog rate of 1.0 to
2.0 mL per hour per 80 cm2
Q-Lab 4x8” CRS
Test Panel Preparation Each monomer tested contained 5.0 %
photoinitiator (Daracure 1173). Substrate: Cold Rolled Steel (CRS) Film Thickness: 1.0 mil unless otherwise
stated. 1600 mJ/cm2 of total UV energy with two
Hg arc lamps (400 w/in.) as measured using the UV Power Puck radiometer.
Corrosion Protection Using Radiation Curable Acrylates
Data & Results
Oligomer Backbone Comparison Ranking: 5 is best
Oligomer Designation
Description B117 Rank
O1 AR Epoxy Acrylate 2 O2 AL Epoxy acrylate 0 O3 Linseed epoxy acrylate 0 O4 Polybutadiene acrylate 1 O5 Amine acrylate 0 O6 Acrylic oligomer 3 O7 Acrylic oligomer 1 O8 Polyester acrylate 0 O9 Polyester acrylate 0
O10 Zn oligomer 0 O11 Brominated epoxy acrylate 2 O12 Novolac epoxy acrylate 1
O1
O6 O7
O9 O8
Oligomer Backbone Comparison Ranking: 5 is best
Test series comprised varied backbone structures. Epoxy acrylates, polyester acrylates, and specialty
acrylics in acrylate monomers. A Bis phenol A aromatic (AR) epoxy acrylate was used
as the control in this round of testing and received a rating of 2.
Despite its hydrophobic nature, the polybutadiene acrylate performed very poorly (1 rating).
The polyester oligomers performed likewise due poor adhesion caused by high functionality.
The best performer was an acrylic oligomer (3 rating).
Urethane Acrylate Comparison
Sample Designation
Oligomer Description B117 Rank
UA1 Lower MW polyester ALUA 1
UA2 Higher MW polyester ALUA 0
UA3 Low viscosity polyester ALUA 1
UA4 Polyester ARUA 0
UA5 Polyether ALUA 3
UA6 Low MW ARUA 3
UA7 Polyester ALUA 4
UA8 Polycarbonate ALUA 4
UA9 Polyester ARUA 4
Ranking: 5 is best
UA9
UA8 UA4
UA7
Urethane Acrylate Comparison
Based on this tes,ng generally, aroma,c urethanes offer an advantage over alipha,c urethanes.
The study also demonstrated that alipha,c urethanes based on polyester or polycarbonate polyols offer significantly improved corrosion resistance.
Relative Corrosion Protection Based on Oligomer Type
Comparison of Commonly used Monomers
Sample Designation
Description B117 Rank
M1 IBOA 0
M2 HDDA 1
M3 Tricyclodecane Dimethanol Diarcylate (TCMDA)
2
M4 TMPTA
0
M5 PETA
0
M6 Cyclic Trimethylolpropane Formal Acrylate (CTFA)
0
Ranking: 5 is best
Testing of Commonly Used Monomers Monomers impart less corrosion protection compared to
oligomers – possibly due to significantly lower molecular weight.
Performance differences may also be linked to functionality.
Mono functional monomers are low in cross link density making them subject to moisture attack.
Higher functionality makes the film too brittle when cured resulting in poor adhesion and surface cracking.
Difunctional monomers seem to offer more protection owing to a balance of cured film properties.
Corrosion Resistant Pigment Testing Inhibitor Weight % B117 Rank
Pigment 1 5% 4
Pigment 2 5% 5
Pigment 3 3% 4
Pigment 4 3% 3
Ranking: 5 is best
TCDMDA P1 P3 P2 P4
Corrosion Resistance of a Difunctional Monomer (TCDMDA) as it Relates to Film Thickness
0.5 mil
3.0 mil
Corrosion Resistance of a Difunctional Monomer as it Relates to Film Thickness
Corrosion resistance improves with coating film thickness.
No added benefit from 2-4 mil.
Application of two thin coating layers is more effective than one thick coating layer.
Second layer fills any voids or defects in the first, providing a higher quality coating.
Accelerated Weathering Testing of Corrosion Resistant Formulations
QUV Equipment & Conditions 8 hours of UV radiation @
60 C. Followed by 4 hours dark
condensation @ 40 C. The lamps were replaced
every 400 hours to ensure constant UV intensity.
The bulb used was a UVA 340 from Q-Panel. The output is from 300 - 400 nanometers centered at 340 nm.
Cure & Application Conditions
Gloss Retention &Yellowing Resistance
Gloss : ASTM D523-89
@ 60 °
Yellowness Index: ASTM E 313-98 geometry: 45/0
illuminant/observer: D65/10°
Effects of Corrosion Inhibiting Pigments on Weathering Resistance (Yellowness Index as it Relates to Hours of QUV Exposure)
Weathering Resistance of Corrosion Protective Urethanes (YI as it relates to QUV exp.)
Weathering Resistance of Corrosion Protective Urethanes (gloss retention @ 60 degrees as it relates to QUV exp.)
Conclusions & Observations Coating Market Trends(2000 – 2004) Chemistries vary widely, including polyurethanes,
acrylics, and alkyds. Epoxy-based coatings are common. The industry is trending toward “green” coating
technologies. Solvent-borne direct-to-metal coatings decreased from
84% to 61%. Over this period the use of waterborne coatings
increased from 13% to 35%. UV/EB curable 100% solids coatings represent a small
but growing portion of the market for direct-to-metal coatings.
Conclusions & Observations Corrosion Protection from Acrylate Chemistries
UV/EB curable coatings based on aromatic backbone structure resist corrosion better than their aliphatic analogs.
Polyester acrylates should not be used to formulate corrosion protective coatings.
Aromatic epoxy acrylates contribute mid-range performance to corrosion protective coatings.
Urethane acrylate oligomers provide the best corrosion protection. Aromatic urethanes are generally superior to aliphatic, there are exceptions
based on backbone structure. Proper selection and use of corrosion inhibiting pigments can greatly
enhance performance of acrylate-based protective coatings. Coating application technique has an impact on the performance of
corrosion protective coatings, e.g., two thin layers are more effective than an equivalent single layer.
Conclusions & Observations, Effect of Weathering on Acrylate-Based Corrosion Protective Coatings ARUA’s offer better corrosion protection than ALUA’s. ARUAs do not resist yellowing as well as ALUAs. Addition of a HALS to coatings based on ARUAs can dramatically
improve weathering resistance. Corrosion inhibiting pigments did not appear to affect weathering
resistance. Over coating an ARUA-based coating with one based on an ALUA may
produce a weathering advantage compared to the use of the ARUA-based coating alone.
Offers concurrent benefit to weathering resistance and corrosion resistance.
Future Work Plans
Expand Coatings Durability Knowledge Base
Prohesion Testing (ASTM D 5894) Combined testing
using : Cyclic salt spray
(ASTM G85). QUV accelerated
weathering testing (ASTM D4587).
Questions Please!