1
E COMPASSION OPENNESS RESPECT EXCELLENCE C O R ‘...the review went on and on and I felt like a spare part….’ Iniave Aim Improve compliance with Care Management Standards Focus on Service User engagement Standardised format re purpose of Review Service User/Representave given choice to aend Review Service User/Representave consent to share informaon Consideraon of DOLS & Human Rights Plan Do Study Act Improve Service User Experience and Quality of Annual Nursing and Residenal Care Reviews Kathryn Carmichael, Lead Social Worker for Permanent Placement Team and Caroline McGonigle, Social Care Governance Manager, NHSCT Learning and Next Steps ‘I am very keen that we work together to save me and resources and improve quality for paents’ - GP ‘I beer understood what the review was about and how important it all is’ Qualitave Outcomes ‘Although I found it difficult to talk about mum’s end of life care I now feel I know what her wishes are’ ‘I felt well informed and sasfied that my opinions counted’ 1. Idenfy Stakeholder Team. 2. Implement revised forms and processes. 3. Provide staff training on new documentaon. 4. Revise documentaon based on Service User, Staff and Provider feedback. 5. Introduce Pre-Review Preparaon Form for Provider. 6. Revise documentaon based on feedback. 7. Introduce standardised leer, statement of review purpose and Aide-Memoire. 8. Introduce trial of hand held tablet devices 9. Review and relaunch revised Pre Review Form 10. Trial with Social Workers person centred approach to review format. ‘I know exactly what is happening with my dad and his care needs’ Raonale ‘..staff kept having to go in and out to get informaon. I can’t understand why they can’t be more organised…’ Permanent Placement Team PDSA Cycles to Streamline and Improve Processes ‘We now have a more streamlined, focused approach going into a review. It is beer for everyone’ - Care Home Regional Manager ‘The team are now knowledgeable about QI and keen for future projects’ - Team Manager ‘My work has radically changed. I now co-ordinate the reviews. This has reduced cancellaons and freed up professional me - Admin staff • Quality Improvement takes me and effort but is worth it. • Quality Improvement is an ongoing process and should be at the heart of pracce. • Workshop on the 7th October 2016 to spread learning and roll out changes to both Permanent Placement Teams. • Embed service user involvement / feedback and promote person centred pracce. • Phased implementaon of handheld devices. • Support teams to embed learning into pracce. Annual Review requirement Improve compliance with NHSCT Care Management audits Service User Feedback indicated improvement required Plan Collaboraon with stakeholders during the project to drive Quality Improvement Quantave Outcomes 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 9 6 February March April May September Human Rights and DOLS considered throughout review Quality Indicators Other professionals invited to aend Service User or Representave consent to share informaon Baseline Sample of 18 NHSCT Service Users Reviewed by Permanent Placement Team Service User / representave given opportunity to be involved in review 9 13 18 17 18 18 0 18 6

R160133 Improve Service User Experience and Quality of ...€¦ · Improve Service User Experience and Quality of Annual Nursing and Residential Care Reviews Kathryn Carmichael, Lead

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: R160133 Improve Service User Experience and Quality of ...€¦ · Improve Service User Experience and Quality of Annual Nursing and Residential Care Reviews Kathryn Carmichael, Lead

E

COMPASSION OPENNESS RESPECT EXCELLENCE

C O R

‘...the review went on and on and I felt like a spare part….’

Initiative AimImprove compliance with Care Management Standards

Focus on Service User engagementStandardised format re purpose of Review

Service User/Representative given choice to attend ReviewService User/Representative consent to share information

Consideration of DOLS & Human Rights

Plan

Do

Study

Act

Improve Service User Experience and Qualityof Annual Nursing and Residential Care Reviews

Kathryn Carmichael, Lead Social Worker for Permanent Placement Team and Caroline McGonigle, Social Care Governance Manager, NHSCT

Learning and Next Steps

‘I am very keen that we work together to save timeand resources and improve quality for patients’ - GP

‘I better understood what the review was about and

how important it all is’

Qualitative Outcomes

‘Although I found it difficultto talk about mum’s end of

life care I now feel I know whather wishes are’

‘I felt well informed and satisfied that my opinions counted’

1. Identify Stakeholder Team.

2. Implement revised forms and processes.

3. Provide staff training on new documentation.

4. Revise documentation based on Service User, Staff and Provider feedback.

5. Introduce Pre-Review Preparation Form for Provider.

6. Revise documentation based on feedback.

7. Introduce standardised letter, statement of review purpose and Aide-Memoire.

8. Introduce trial of hand held tablet devices

9. Review and relaunch revised Pre Review Form

10. Trial with Social Workers person centred approach to review format.

‘I know exactly what is happeningwith my dad and his care needs’

Rationale

‘..staff kept having to go in and out to get information. I can’t understand why they can’t be more organised…’

Permanent Placement Team PDSA Cycles to Streamline and Improve Processes

‘We now have a more streamlined, focused approachgoing into a review. It is better

for everyone’ - Care Home Regional Manager

‘The team are now knowledgeableabout QI and keen for future

projects’ - Team Manager

‘My work has radically changed.I now co-ordinate the reviews.This has reduced cancellationsand freed up professional time

- Admin staff

• Quality Improvement takes time and effort but is worth it.• Quality Improvement is an ongoing process and should be at the heart of practice.• Workshop on the 7th October 2016 to spread learning and roll out changes to both Permanent Placement Teams.• Embed service user involvement / feedback and promote person centred practice.• Phased implementation of handheld devices.• Support teams to embed learning into practice.

Annual Review requirementImprove compliance with NHSCT Care Management audits

Service User Feedback indicated improvement required

Plan

Collaboration with stakeholders during the project to drive Quality Improvement

Quantitative Outcomes

20

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

9

6

February March April May September

Human Rights and DOLS considered throughout review

Quality Indicators

Other professionals invited to attend

Service User or Representative consent to share information

Baseline

Sample of 18 NHSCT Service Users Reviewed by Permanent Placement Team

‘My work has radically changed. I now co-ordinate the reviews. This has reduced cancellations and free up professional time’ - Admin staff

The team are now knowledgeable about QI and keen for future projects. - Team Manager

Service User / representative given opportunity to be involved in review

9

13

18

17

1818

0

18

6