R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    1/65

    CENDOR BRIDGE

    LOADOUT PROCEDURE

    0 21/7/2014 ISSUED FOR REVIEW PRAVEEN EDMUND LEE

    REV DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED

    CONTRACTOR APPROVED COMPANY

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    2/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    CONTENT

    1. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION

    2. SCOPE OF WORKS

    3. ORGANIZATION CHART

    4. TECHNICAL DRAWINGS

    Transport Proposal Drawing

    Bogie Path Drawing

    Pump Location Drawing

    5. TECHNICAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS

    Transport Stability Analysis

    Ballasting calculation

    Trailer Spine Beam Analysis

    Ro-Ro Ramp Strength Calculation

    6. EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS

    Goldhofer Multi-axle Trailer

    Ballast Pump

    Sample Operator Certificate

    Sample Trailer Conformity Certificate

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    3/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    4/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    1.4 Transportation

    1.4.1 Preparation

    Prior to the transportation and roll on operation a few essential preparations need to take

    place.

    Route PreparationAccess route to be cleared with sufficient clearance and free of sharp objects.Uneven ground to be leveled, compacted and if necessary to be covered with steelplates.

    Preparation of structure at site.Final Weight Control Report and COG location must be provided in order toreconfirm the SPMT capacity.Sufficient clearance underneath the structure to be confirmed and free ofobstructions.

    Barge HandlingBarge to be positioned to the allocated quay and moored with mooring ropesprovided by client. If required tug boat/s to be ready to keep barge in position inlocation with high cross current.Secured access from quay onto barge to be provided.Client to provide suitable fenders/bumpers for barge contact with quay.

    Daily weather forecast to be provided one week prior to load-out operation. Thegeneral environment limitation for loadout operation are as follows:Wind Speed: Beaufort 5 maximum (21 Knots or 10.81meter/sec)Visibility: 100m

    Temperature: -5C minimum to 40CGround Surface: Good Traction (Asphalt/Compacted gravel or equivalent)

    Following preparation works on barge to be carried out in readiness for load-out tocommence.

    Barge Deck PreparationThe transportation route on the deck of transportation barge needs to be cleanedand made free from any obstacles.Trailer path needs to be clearly marked on barge and quay by Client as indicated by

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    5/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    All Goldhofer transporter modules used for this job are presently based in Malaysia.4 possible types can be mobilised for this particular project which are the THP/SL,PST/SL or PST-SLE module. These units can be mobilised by road or by sea andwill arrive on site not later than 2 days before operation is about to commence.Once arrived they will be combined into the desired configurations for the firsttransport and tested. Further details of the transporters can be found in the followingdocument.

    The ballasting pumps are usually of the type fitted with a separate Diesel engine foreach individual pump. The pumps have suction and discharge hoses which are 6(150mm) in diameter. The capacity of each pump depend on the suction depth i.e.barge size, but is maximum 400 tonnes per hour. The quantity of pumps used verymuch depends on the weight of the cargo/structure, barge size and tide restrictions.For this loadout operation, thats 10 ballast pumps being used with design capacity250 tonnes per hour.

    The barge RO-RO ramp is usually supplied by Air Marine as well and will bemobilised together with the transporters modules. Part of the RO-RO ramp systemis the hinge beam. The hinge beam provides a hinge connection between the rampsand the barge. This beam will be fixed to the barge deck by means of welding byclient with supervision and approval from AM supervisor. Wooden wedges will beplaced loose on either side of the RO-RO ramps in order to allow a smoothtransition. The ramps itself will only be connected minutes before the roll operationcommences.

    1.4.2 The transporters

    For the task of moving the cargo/structure from its fabrication location into the barge, a

    number of axles Goldhofer Self Propelled Transporters will be used. This type of

    transporter is fitted with computer controlled steering mechanisms which allow an

    unlimited number of separate boogies to be controlled by only 1 operator. The units are

    specially designed for this type of ultra heavy movements and are fitted with hydraulic

    power packs with large diesel engines. The power packs will generate a large flow ofhydraulic oil which is led to the drive motors fitted in the hubs of the driven axles.

    To determine the number of axles to be utilized for a heavy move a number of criteria

    will need to be studied and analyzed. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    6/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    Transportation Preparation Works

    Following preparation works for SPMT until setting up underneath structure.1.9.1 Upon arrival of SPMT and auxiliary equipments at site, Air-Marine personnel will

    offload with Clients cranage and visually checking physical condition in order toidentify damages.

    1.9.2 Assembly of SPMT will start with focus on making sure all sensitive hydraulic and

    electrical connectors are clean.1.9.3 SPMT will be independently tested for it functions i.e. Steering, hydraulics

    suspension, drive and pneumatic braking.1.9.4 After individually driven to position underneath structure, SPMT will

    independently raise until it is in contact with structures supports.1.9.5 The SPMT will raise concurrently until all groupings achieve manometers reading

    of 100 bars (equivalent to 7.5 Tonnes payload per axle)

    1.4.3 Loading and unloadingLoading and unloading of the Module is done using the transporters built in jacking

    system. The trailers are simply placed underneath the cargo and then jacked up. This is

    done in two steps. First each individual module is jacked up so the top of the trailer is

    just touching the bottom of the transport/loadout beam. Subsequently the hydraulics and

    the steering connections are made thus interconnecting all trailers together and allowing

    operation from a single source. After this is completed the trailers can take up the weight

    and the transport operation can commence.

    The unloading operation on the barge after loadout is done in opposite order.

    One important thing to consider for this is the height of the seafastening grillages on the

    barge. As a rule of thumb the height of the cargo/structure should end up exactly the

    same as the fabrication height in the yard prior to loadout.

    Jacking up of structure and moving towards quayside

    1.8.1 A joint final inspection by client and Air-Marines personnel to be carried outaround the structure to identify any loose items such as scaffolding, weldingcables etc. which would fall during transportation.

    1.8.2 Before proceeding further, a safety briefing to be conducted and lead by ClientsHSE personnel.

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    7/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    1.8.8 When approaching the quayside, the SPMT and structure to be aligned withmarked pathways leading onto the barge.

    1.8.9 If load-out does not commence immediately, the SPMTs will be valve off andpower packs powered down.

    1.5 Transportation Criteria

    For transportation of any of the cargoes the trailers will always be positioned in such a way

    that the self propelled module will enter the barge first. Doing it this way the barge will not be

    pushed away by the traction force of the trailer, but pulled towards the quay instead. One

    operator who will receive its instructions from the transport superintendent will control the

    whole transport operation.

    1.6 Roll on and ballasting operation

    During the roll on operation the barge will have the tendency to move with the changing

    loading on the barge deck as well as the incoming tidal flow. In order to ensure a safeoperation of the roll on operation 3 things will be established:

    Roll on operation will take place during an upcoming tide. This in order to have thetide working with the ballasting operation instead of against it.

    The barge will be kept level (0o trim angle) by means of deballast the water in thebarge at the stern end during the roll on operation.

    The barge deck will be kept between 0mm and 200mm above the quay by means of

    de-ballast the water out from the barge at the stern end during the roll on operation.

    The amount of water that needs to be pumped in and out of the barges ballast tanks very

    much depends on the barge in question and will be calculated for every move. The

    calculation will be made for every 9000mm the cargo moves towards the final setting

    location. The basis of this calculation is to keep the moment around the LCG of the barge

    equal and adjust the barges draft for the upcoming tide thus achieving our objectives.

    There will be sufficient spare pump capacity available to keep the barge level with the quayduring the changing tide in case of 50% pump failure, but normally it is physically not

    possible to keep the barge at that position 24 hours a day. Generally this is a situation

    acceptable for loadouts using transporters.

    The duration of the crossover from land to barge will take usually between 20 minutes to

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    8/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    9/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    II. If only or two of the leading axles have crossed the RO-RO ramp then it may not benecessary to hold the barge until high water to commence the retrieval operation.

    III. The structure will be driven back towards the RO-RO ramp and onto the quay inconjunction with starting the necessary ballast pumps. The movement of thestructure will be intermittent to match the ballasting operation.

    IV. Throughout the retrieval operation constant checks will be made on the following: Control clearance (i.e. the gap created, due to the angle of the RO-RO ramp,

    between the underside of the RO-RO Ramp and the barge deck);10 mm minimum 100 mm maximum, measured by using a tape measure.

    Barge trim (1000 mm maximum) measured by reading pontoon draft marks. Barge heel, (200 mm maximum) measured by monitoring the port and starboard

    RORO ramp control clearances. Tide level, measured by reading the quayside tide gauge. Ballast tanks water level, measured by sonic measuring device or tape measure.

    V. These checks will be carried out until the trailers and their associated power packsare clear of the RO-RO ramp.

    VI. The retrieval operation will follow a complete reversal of the load-out operation.

    VII. Performance of the trailers, ballast pumps and moorings will be monitoredthroughout the retrieval operation.

    The possibility of postponing or termination of a load-out operation may existand its criteria prior to load-out would most probably include but not limited tothe followings.

    1.8.1 Major equipments such as transport, ballast or mooring system become defective

    1.8.2 Data relating to the structure and barge is found to have significant differencefrom earlier provided and thus compromising the SPMT loading calculation,drawings and related procedures.

    1.8.3 Weather conditions are found to be significantly worse than forecasted.1.8.4 In the event of serious technical difficulties, there are no absolute criteria for

    termination of the commencing load-out operation. The decision on whether topull back or continue with the load-out operation would be a joint decision made

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    10/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    1.9.3 Ballast pumps to be dismantled and lifted off the barge using suitable Clientscranage.

    2) SCOPE OF WORKS

    No DescriptionAi r

    MarineCLIENT

    1 Preparation

    1.1 Preparation of transportation and ballasting procedures

    1.2 Supply site & cargo drawings

    1.3 Supply accurate weight and center of gravity information

    1.4 Moblisation and demobilisation of trailers, pumps and ramps

    1.5 Assembly and dismantling of SPMT

    1.6 Any ground preparations or civil works required on site

    1.7 Any temporary removal of obstructions, lampposts, signs, etc

    1.8 Supply suitable transport frames and/or load spreading

    1.9Supply suitable loading situation enabling trailer to be positioned

    underneath the items to be transported

    2 Transportation works

    2.1Supply all manpower and supervision required for transportation

    k

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    11/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    3 Ballasting works

    3.1 Supply of barge suitable for RO-RO and ballasting operation

    3.2 Supply RO-RO ramps

    3.3 Install & remove RO-RO ramps (welding & cutting)

    3.4 Supply main ballasting pumps

    3.5 Operate barge's ballasting pumps

    3.6 Overall supervision of ballasting procedure

    3.7 Supply suitable area for positioning of the pumps

    3.8 Supply additional standby pumps

    3.9 Barge tank cleaning if required

    3.10 Barge gas free certification

    3.11 Barge opening and closing of manholes

    4 Miscellaneous

    4.1 Temporary access for trailer and personnel

    4.2 Insurance of Air Marine equipment and manpower

    4.3 Insurance of items to be transported

    4.6 Diesel for trailers and assist equipment

    4.7 Maintenance and repairs of trailers or other Air-Marine equipment

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    12/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    13/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    4) TECHNICAL DRAWINGS

    Please see the next page

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    14/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    Transport Proposal Drawing

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    15/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    16/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    17/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    18/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    19/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    20/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    21/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    Transport Stability Analysis

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    22/65

    Cargo :

    Client :

    Project : WHEATSTONE LNG

    COG cargo

    Loadout Beam (cargo sits on top of beams)

    Transport beams

    Ballast weight (ballast weight in between cargo support)

    Total

    Combined cog (with trailer, distance measured from trailer deck to cog)

    Distance cog (=cog to axle rotation point)

    Trailer type

    Capacity per line

    Own weight per line

    Group 1

    Group 2

    Group 3

    Total

    Note:

    -Stability angles should be higher than 8.0 degrees at all tim e

    CENDOR BRIDGE

    SAPURA KENCANA

    630

    X - coordinate Y - coordinate Z-coordinate

    (mm) (mm)

    300 80

    330

    Height

    (mm)

    11653

    0

    Weight

    (tonnes)

    250

    8

    24 110

    32 130.94

    330.0

    9000 -1650

    Payload per

    (tonnes/m)

    45.4616.37

    2.78

    45.46

    (tonnes)

    46

    32

    15.46

    1288

    1858

    1288

    15.46

    21.75

    mm

    mm

    mm

    4.5316.37130.94

    Calculation results

    (degrees)

    angle

    StabilityGrd Bearing

    Pressure

    Distance (d) to

    stability triangle

    (mm)

    4.53

    Payload on the

    Driving height

    Axle rotation pt36

    tonnes Centre of gravity

    (relative to ground level)

    (relative to ground level)

    (relative to trailer deck)

    tonnes

    4

    Goldhofer SL

    3881 mm

    4656 mm

    1175

    400

    -400

    (mm)

    7142 0 5203

    0 0 0

    7142

    0

    0

    Transport stability calculation

    axleline

    8.52

    (tonnes) %(tonnes)

    68.13 23.66

    Own Weight trailer

    Calculation input

    Y - coordinate No. of axle lines

    (mm) (mm)

    0

    1650

    8

    89000

    0

    X - coordinate

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    23/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    Ballasting Calculation

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    24/65

    Barge particularsBarge name Length 54.9 m Height 3.66 m

    Case descri ition Loadout ballastin Width 18.3 m Li ht shi 560 tonnes

    Barge ballasting Cendor Bridge

    TWM 56

    Ballast tank particulars

    Y-coordinate X-coordinate Capacity Y-coordinate X-coordinate Capacity Y-coordinate X-coordinate Capacity

    mm mm (m

    3

    ) mm mm (m

    3

    ) mm mm (m

    3

    )

    Combiend center tanksPort side Starboard side

    FP -44,802 -11,430 0 -44,802 0 0 -44,802 11,430 0

    1 -24,348 -6,050 88 -24,348 0 88 -24,348 6,050 88

    2 -16,488 -6,070 237 -16,488 0 240 -16,488 6,070 237

    3 -5,498 -6,070 238 -5,498 0 240 -5,498 6,070 238

    4 5,462 -6,070 238 5,462 0 240 5,462 6,070 238

    5 16,452 -6,070 237 16,452 0 240 16,452 6,070 237

    6 24,332 -6,060 88 24,332 0 89 24,332 6,060 88

    AP 46,665 -6,060 0 46,665 0 0 46,665 6,060 0

    Estimated empty barge freeboard

    Water density 1.025tonnes/m3

    (fresh water = 1.000, sea water = 1.025)

    Estimated barge weight 588 tonnes (inclusive residual water and mud in tanks)

    s ma e avg ra . mEstimated avg freeboard 2.98 m

    Quay particulars

    Height 4.0 m (relative to chart datum)

    ax mum a ow . m r

    Pumps per hour 250.0m3

    Reference: R1-Ballasting Analysis Cendor Bridge.xlsx Page 1 Update: 21/7/2014

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    25/65

    Barge ballasting Cendor Bridge

    Loads on the empty barge before pre-ballast

    No Item Weight X-coordinate Y-coordinate X-moment Y-moment

    2 0.0 0.000 0.000 0 0

    3

    4

    5

    67

    Total 60 0 0

    Trailer set upNo Axle lines X-coordinate Distance Axle line load Ttl weight Remarks

    1 8 -1521 12750 12.5 100.2 Distance to 1st axle combination

    2 8 -3171 0 20.4 163.0 Distance to 1st axle combination

    3 8 129 0 20.4 163.0 Distance to 1st axle combination 0 0

    0 0

    103 0

    .

    Notes: 0 0

    - Distance is to the 1st axle that will enter the barge 90 0

    - Y-coordinate 0 = LCG empty barge = 42832mm from barge stern, Positive direction is towards stern 0 0

    - Cross over to commence on tide +2m ACD 0 0

    - Starboard and Port side center tanks to be filled e ual 0 0

    - Axle line load shown included bogie self-weight 0 0

    Reference: R1-Ballasting Analysis Cendor Bridge.xlsx Page 2 Update: 21/7/2014

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    26/65

    Summary of all Steps

    Barge ballasting Cendor Bridge

    Step 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

    Step time 25 18 48 11 10 12 45 89 38 79 4 7 6 6 3 2 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Total time 25 43 91 102 111 123 168 257 295 374 378 385 391 397 400 402 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 456

    Hei ht 0 2 12 69 117 164 -151 2 157 -6161215 1136 1014 889 775 702 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!Trim 37 19 7 -134 -243 -346 337 358 68 1719 1894 1728 1476 1221 998 852 2280 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

    heel Change -372 -297 -297 -22 168 475 123 123 -1944 -1944 -1470 -2568 -3596 -4589 -5090 -5499 -5499 -4147 -4147 -4147 -4147 -4147 -4147 -4147 -4147 -4147 -4147 0 0

    Draft 1.96 1.95 2.022.15 2.26 2.36 2.32 1.13 1.22 1.10 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.90 0.91 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

    Freeboard 1.69 1.71 1.641.51 1.40 1.30 1.34 2.53 2.44 2.56 2.78 2.79 2.80 2.80 2.76 2.75 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

    Tide 2.12 2.21 2.452.51 2.56 2.62 2.84 3.28 3.47 3.87 3.89 3.93 3.96 3.99 4.00 4.01 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.28

    Max change 103 75 200 45 40 50 186 370 160 330 18 28 26 25 11 10 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Max rate 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Notes:

    - Max change is the maximum change of ballast for the worst case tank

    - e max ra e s e pump capac y ava a e on e an w g es pump capac y ns a e n r

    Reference: R1-Ballasting Analysis Cendor Bridge.xlsx Page 4 Update: 21/7/2014

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    27/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    28/65

    Pre-ballasting2.00 m (low tide at day of operation)

    2.20 m to et bar e 200mm above the ett

    Tide

    Freeboard re uired

    Barge ballasting Cendor Bridge

    1.46 m (Requirement)

    0.78 m (to be achieved by ballasting)

    1,311 tonnes (After ballasting)

    663 tonnes (this is inclusive the load on deck)

    0.00 time into the loadout 0Time

    Draft change

    New displacement

    New draft

    Ballast change

    Y-coordinate Y-moment Y-coordinate Y-moment Y-coordinate Y-moment

    (mm) (m ) % Change (tonnesm) (mm) (m ) % Change (tonnesm) (mm) (m ) % Change (tonnesm)

    FP -44,802 0 0% 0 0 -44,802 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 -44,802 0 0% 0 0

    Tank contents

    Starboard side

    Tank contents

    Port side Combined Center

    Tank contents

    1 -24,348 0 0% 0 0 -24,348 0 0% 0 0 -24,348 0 0% 0 0

    2 -16,488 200 84% 200 -3,380 -16,488 0 0% 0 0 -16,488 200 84% 200 -3,380

    3 -5,498 0 0% 0 0 -5,498 0 0% 0 0 -5,498 0 0% 0 04 5,462 0 0% 0 0 5,462 0 0% 0 0 5,462 0 0% 0 0

    5 16,452 100 42% 100 1,686 16,452 237 99% 237 3,997 16,452 100 42% 100 1,686

    , , ,

    AP 46,665 0 0% 0 0 46,665 0 0% 0 0 46,665 0 0% 0 0

    Summary 300 361.2 -2,936 15.2 0 300 361.2 2,936

    a as ng o a sp acemen , c ua avg ra . mLoad on deck 60 0 Trim changing moment 609 Actual trim 15 cm

    0 0 Ballasting Port Side -3,515 Ballasting Starboard Side 3,515Heel Changing Moment 0

    Actual bow barge above quay 2 cm Degree of barge heel 0

    308 0 0.415 88

    Reference: R1-Ballasting Analysis Cendor Bridge.xlsx Page 6 Update: 21/7/2014

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    29/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    30/65

    Barge ballasting Cendor Bridge

    Step 1: Y= Axle no 6 on barge stern42832

    Trailer no

    No of axlelines on the barge 0 6 6 0 0 0 (of each trailer)

    Load on deck 0.0 122.2 122.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 244.4 (all axle lines together which are on the barge)

    Y-coordinate of load 0 -22932 -22932 0 0 0 (combined loads all axlelines on the barge)

    Moment caused by trailer 0 -2803 -2803 0 0 0 -5,605 (over stern of the barge, x direction only)

    Tide 2.12 m (low tide at day of operation)

    Freeboard required 2.08 m (to get barge 200mm above the jetty)

    Time 25 minutes (time into the loadout)

    Port side Starboard sideCombined Center

    Y-coordinate Y-moment Y-coordinate Y-moment Y-coordinate Y-moment

    (mm) (m3) % Change (tonnesm) (mm) (m

    3) % Change (tonnesm) (mm) (m

    3) % Change (tonnesm)

    FP -44,802 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 -44,802 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 -44,802 0 #DIV/0! 0 0

    1 -24,348 0 0% 0 0 -24,348 0 0% 0 0 -24,348 0 0% 0 0

    2 -16,488 97 41% -103 -1,639 -16,488 0 0% 0 0 -16,488 97 41% -103 -1,639

    Tank contentsTank contentsTank contents

    - , - , - ,

    4 5,462 0 0% 0 0 5,462 0 0% 0 0 5,462 0 0% 0 0

    5 16,452 190 80% 90 3,204 16,452 237 99% 0 3,997 16,452 190 80% 90 3,204

    6 24,332 0 0% 0 0 24,332 0 0% 0 0 24,332 0 0% 0 0

    AP 46,665 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 46,665 0 0% 0 0 46,665 0 #DIV/0! 0 0

    16

    Summary 90 13

    Ballasting 52 848 7,126 Ttl displacement 1,740 Actual avg draft 1.96 m

    Load on deck 304 -5,605 Trim changing moment 1,521 Actual trim 37 cm

    X-Moment Trailer -372 Ballasting Port Side -3,362 Ballasting Starboard Side 3,362Heel Changing Moment -372

    Actual bow barge above quay 0 cm

    Reference: R1-Ballasting Analysis Cendor Bridge.xlsx Page 8 Update: 21/7/2014

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    31/65

    Barge ballasting Cendor Bridge

    Step 1: Y= 42832 Axle no 6 on barge stern

    . . . . . . . . . .

    0% 0% #DIV/0! 0% 80% 0% 0% 41% 0% #DIV/0!

    3.66 3.66 #DIV/0! 3.66 0.73 3.66 3.66 2.16 3.66 #DIV/0!

    Ballasting Deballasting

    .C .C AP.C 6.C 5.C 4.C 3.C 2.C 1.C FP.C

    0% 0% 0% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 0% #DIV/0!

    3.66 3.66 3.66 3.66 0.05 3.66 3.66 3.66 3.66 #DIV/0!Bow

    Stern

    Ballasting Deballasting

    3.66 3.66 #DIV/0! 3.66 0.73 3.66 3.66 2.16 3.66 #DIV/0!

    0% 0% #DIV/0! 0% 80% 0% 0% 41% 0% #DIV/0!

    .S .S AP.S 6.S 5.S 4.S 3.S 2.S 1.S FP.S

    Notes:

    - information shown is after end of the step

    - Action shown is after reaching desired situation Draft = 1.96 m

    - Measurement in m is distance from deck to water level

    Reference: R1-Ballasting Analysis Cendor Bridge.xlsx Page 9 Update: 21/7/2014

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    32/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    33/65

    Barge ballasting Cendor Bridge

    Step 2: Y= 38632 Axle no 12 on barge stern

    . . . . . . . . . .

    0% 0% #DIV/0! 0% 70% 0% 0% 9% 0% #DIV/0!

    3.66 3.66 #DIV/0! 3.66 1.11 3.66 3.66 3.32 3.66 #DIV/0!

    Deballasting Deballasting

    .C .C AP.C 6.C 5.C 4.C 3.C 2.C 1.C FP.C

    N

    3.66 3.66 3.66 3.66 0.05 3.66 3.66 3.66 3.66 #DIV/0!STER

    BO

    3.66 3.66 #DIV/0! 3.66 1.11 3.66 3.66 2.86 3.66 #DIV/0!

    0% 0% #DIV/0! 0% 70% 0% 0% 22% 0% #DIV/0!

    .S .S AP.S 6.S 5.S 4.S 3.S 2.S 1.S FP.S

    Notes:

    - information shown is after end of the step

    - Action shown is after reaching desired situation Draft = 1.95 m

    - Measurement in m is distance from deck to water level

    Reference: R1-Ballasting Analysis Cendor Bridge.xlsx Page 11 Update: 21/7/2014

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    34/65

    Barge ballasting Cendor Bridge

    Step 3: Y= All axles at final position24319Trailer no

    No of axlelines on the barge 8 8 8 0 0 0 (of each trailer)

    Load on deck 100.2 163.0 163.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 426.1 (all axle lines together which are on the barge)

    Y-coordinate of load 2830 11830 11830 0 0 0 (combined loads all axlelines on the barge)

    Moment caused by trailer 283 1928 1928 0 0 0 4,139 (over stern of the barge, x direction only)

    Tide 2.45 m (low tide at day of operation)

    Freeboard required 1.75 m (to get barge 200mm above the jetty)

    Time 91 minutes (time into the loadout)

    Combined CenterPort side Starboard side

    -coor na e -momen -coor na e -momen -coor na e -momen

    (mm) (m3) % Change (tonnesm) (mm) (m

    3) % Change (tonnesm) (mm) (m

    3) % Change (tonnesm)

    FP 0 0 0% 0 0 -44,802 0 0% 0 0 -44,802 0 0% 0 0

    1 -24,348 0 0% 0 0 -24,348 0 0% 0 0 -24,348 0 0% 0 02 -16,488 222 94% 200 -3,752 -16,488 0 0% 0 0 -16,488 252 106% 200 -4,259

    - - -

    an con en s an con en s an con en s

    , , ,

    4 5,462 0 0% 0 0 5,462 0 0% 0 0 5,462 0 0% 0 0

    5 16,452 5 2% -160 84 16,452 237 99% 0 3,997 16,452 5 2% -160 84

    6 24,332 0 0% 0 0 24,332 0 0% 0 0 24,332 0 0% 0 0

    AP 46,665 0 0% 0 0 46,665 0 0% 0 0 46,665 0 0% 0 0

    Summary 160 40

    Ballasting 739 -3,845 Ttl displacement 1,813 Actual avg draft 2.02 m

    Load on deck 486 4,139 Trim changing moment 294 Actual trim 7 cm

    X-Moment Trailer -648 Ballasting Port Side -2,659 Ballasting Starboard Side 3,011Heel Changing Moment -297

    Actual bow barge above quay 12 cm

    Reference: R1-Ballasting Analysis Cendor Bridge.xlsx Page 12 Update: 21/7/2014

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    35/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    36/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    Trailer Spine Beam Analysis

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    37/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    38/65

    9M BEAM 9M BEAM

    AM/KHL/CDW

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    39/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    Ro-Ro Ramp Strength Calculation

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    40/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    41/65

    AM/KHL/CDW-

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    42/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    6) EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS

    Please see the next page

    KENCANA HL SDN BHDAM/KHL/CDW-

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    43/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW

    BDG/M

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    Goldhofer Multi-axle Trailer

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    44/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    45/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    46/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    47/65

    BALLASTING

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    48/65

    BALLASTING

    Pump dimensions

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    49/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    50/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    51/65

    RORO RAMP

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    52/65

    RORO RAMP

    Barge ro-ro ramp and wedge dimensions

    RORO RAMP

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    53/65

    Barge ro-ro ramp arrangement

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    54/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    55/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    56/65

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    Sample Trailer Certif icate

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    57/65

    KENCANAHLSDNBHDAM/KHL/CDW-

    BDG/M

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    58/65

    CENDORBRIDGESECTION2LOADOUTPROCEDURE Revision:0

    7) JOB SAFETY ANALYSIS

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    59/65

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    60/65

    No When things can happen Potential risk / hazardHow to avoid / counter re-act / plan

    contingency

    Job Safety AnalysisLoadout operations

    I)Transporter assembly done in time to allow last

    minute dispatch of small parts

    II)Insist on flexibility from independent

    subcontractors to use each other's tools/parts

    I)Make sure not all transporters arrive at the

    same time

    II)Carefully plan quantity of assist equipment

    required and closely follow up

    III)Client to dedicate certain quantity of assist

    equipment for this purpose

    I) Clearly request and monitor the required space

    II)Double check space available at least 3 days

    prior to positioning date

    I)

    The supports are to be very precicely positioned

    in line for positioning of long trailers with

    sufficient gaps

    II)Client to have a set of jacks on standby for last

    minute required changesI)

    Mobilise at least 2 pcs additional beams other

    than required for contingency purpose

    II)Have sufficient hardwood jacking timber on

    standby for last minute adjustments/shimming

    2)During assembly and dismantling of the

    transporters at site

    b)Not sufficient assist equipment (eg crane,

    forklift) available at site

    a) Some transporter connection parts are missing

    3)During positioning, pick up & testing of the

    transporters underneath the cargo

    a)Not sufficient space under module to position

    transporters

    b)Module supports are not positioned in a straight

    line

    c)Not enough supports or support beams

    available on top of the transporters

    JOB SAFETY ANALYSISLoadout works

    Updated: 11/7/2013Page 2 of 7

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    61/65

    No When things can happen Potential risk / hazardHow to avoid / counter re-act / plan

    contingency

    Job Safety AnalysisLoadout operations

    I)

    Close off the partition involved to be able to

    continue job. Complete proper repair after

    testing

    II) Test all hydraulic systems to maximum pressureprior to positioning transporters under the decks

    III)Mobilise a number of hoses which are most

    likely to give way

    IV)Designate a hydraulic hose shop in the v icinity

    for quick repairs

    e) Major powerpack failure I)Have sufficient contingency built in to be able to

    continue the job with one powerpack less

    I) Be ready for last minute adjustments oftransporter configurations

    II)

    Be ready to mobilise additional transporters in

    case problem can not be solved by change of

    transporter configurations

    III)

    Client to double check and closely monitor their

    weight control reports and center of gravity

    calculations

    IV)

    Be ready prepared for last minute changes in

    the hydraulic grouping of the transporters'

    suspension cylinders

    d) Hydraulic hose bursts

    f)Center of gravity not in position as expected

    resulting in overloading of certain transporters

    3)

    ( continued) During positioning, pick up

    & testing of the transporters underneath the

    cargo

    JOB SAFETY ANALYSISLoadout works

    Updated: 11/7/2013Page 3 of 7

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    62/65

    No When things can happen Potential risk / hazardHow to avoid / counter re-act / plan

    contingency

    Job Safety AnalysisLoadout operations

    I)Initially plan transporter loading to maximum

    90% of maximum loading

    II)

    Be ready to mobilise additional transporters in

    case problem can not be solved by change of

    transporter configurations

    III)

    Client to double check and closely monitor their

    weight control reports and center of gravity

    calculations

    I) Have spare computers/parts on standby on site

    II)Have electronic expert on standby on site for

    emergency cases

    III) Continue testing at manual override mode andmake proper repair prior to transportation

    I) Have at least 1 control box on standby

    II) Have sufficient connection cables on standby

    III)Have electronic expert on standby for

    emergency cases

    I)Continue testing with the flat tyre and change

    tyre after testing

    II)Check tyre pressures prior to placing

    transporters underneath the decks

    III)Check transporter path for sharp objects prior to

    placing transporter underneath the decks

    3)

    ( continued) During positioning, pick up

    & testing of the transporters underneath the

    cargo

    i) Control box failure

    j) Tyre failure

    g) Module heavier than expected

    h) Powerpack on-board computer failure

    JOB SAFETY ANALYSISLoadout works

    Updated: 11/7/2013Page 4 of 7

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    63/65

    No When things can happen Potential risk / hazardHow to avoid / counter re-act / plan

    contingency

    Job Safety AnalysisLoadout operations

    I)Close off the partition involved to be able to

    continue job if feasible , if not replace the hose

    II) Test all hydraulic systems to maximum pressureprior to positioning transporters under the decks

    III)Mobilise a number of hoses which are most

    likely to give way

    IV) Have a oil splil absorbent kit on standby

    V)Designate a hydraulic hose shop in the v icinity

    for quick repairs

    b) Major powerpack failure I)Have sufficient contingency built in to be able to

    continue the job with one powerpack less

    I) Have spare computers/parts on standby on site

    II)Have electronic expert on standby on site for

    emergency cases

    III) Continue at manual override mode if possible

    I)Have at least 1 control box on standby for each

    system (being Goldhofer and SPMT)

    II) Have sufficient connection cables on standby

    III)Have electronic expert on standby for

    emergency cases

    Hydraulic hose bursts

    Powerpack on-board computer failure

    Control box failure

    4) Transporter related incidents

    d)

    c)

    a)

    JOB SAFETY ANALYSISLoadout works

    Updated: 11/7/2013Page 5 of 7

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    64/65

    J b S f t A l i

  • 7/21/2019 R0 Procedure Cendor Bridge

    65/65

    No When things can happen Potential risk / hazardHow to avoid / counter re-act / plan

    contingency

    Job Safety AnalysisLoadout operations

    I) Client to have rescue boat on standby

    II)

    All personnel on the barge to wear life vests on

    board the barge when working outside the

    barrier

    I)Have sufficient contingency built in to be able to

    continue the job with a 50% of the pumps only

    II) Repair the pump if easily achieavble

    I)Client to have a gas free test done prior to doin

    any welding done on the barge

    II)Cover transporter with fire blankets where

    sparks are expected to drop down on transporter

    III) Have a fire extinguisher on standby at all time

    Pump failureb)

    5) During ballasting & barge crossover

    a) Man overboard

    c) Fire during welding or other hot works

    JOB SAFETY ANALYSISLoadout works Updated: 11/7/2013Page 7 of 7