Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quasars as high redshift standard candles
The LX-LUV relation at high redshiftF. Salvestrini (Università di Bologna; OASBO)
G. Risaliti, S. Bisogni, E. Lusso
The LX-LUV relation: why?1. Where does it come from?
Corona
Accretion disc
BH
ObserverLX = KL�UV
The LX-LUV relation: why?
Planck (2015)
27.5%
68.5%
4%
Komatsu et al. (2011)
1. Constraints on the unknown physical mechanism
2. Quasars as Standard Candles
Betoule et al. (2014)
Hubble Diagram of SN1A
Avni and Tananbaum (1986)
Lusso et al. (2010)
The LX-LUV relation
!intr ~ 0.35-0.40 dex
The LX-LUV relation
� ⇠ 0.6� 0.65
Lusso and Risaliti (2016)
‣ SDSS DR7 (Shen et al. 2011)
‣ 3XMM-DR5‣ No BAL sources ‣ Radio Quiet
‣ 1.6 < "X < 2.8
‣ 2153 sources‣ 0.065 < z < 4.925
The sample ‣ SDSS DR7 (Shen et al. 2011)
& DR12 (for z<5.3)
‣ No BAL sources‣ Radio Quiet ‣ Archival Chandra and XMM-Newton observations
‣ No X-ray flux upper limit‣ 4.0 < z <7.08 Evolution with redshift?
}Accurate X-ray analysis
Accurate selection
Salvestrini et al. in prep.More details in:
� = 0.51+0.12�0.12
� = 0.22 dex
Consistency with lower redshift results
⌦m = 0.34+0.07�0.08
⌦⇤ = 0.71+0.09�0.09
� = 0.615+0.012�0.012
� = 0.268+0.05�0.05
Conclusions1. LUV - LX relation
‣ Accurate sample selection
‣ More reliable flux estimates
‣ No evidence of evolution with redshift
2. Hubble Diagram of quasars
‣ Test of the #CDM model
‣ Test on possible extensions to standard model
Lower intrinsic dispersion}
Thank you!