Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Parametric Down Conversion
Quantum optics seminar 77740Winter 2008Assaf Shaham
context
• Introduction• Theory of classic Sum Frequency
Generation• Quantum Hamiltonian for PDC• Applications
Non linear optics • Creation of new frequencies in the system.• Usually, the new frequencies have small amplitude
relative to the input frequencies.
Harmonic Difference Generation
1ω132 ωωω −=
3ωNon linear medium
2ω
3ω pump
idler
pump
idler1ω
signal
(optional)
PDC: the degenerate case
2/321 ωωω == Non linear medium 3ω pump
3ω2/32 ωω =pump Signal, idler
Nonlinear medium
Non linear dependency of the polarization in the electrical field:
4D E P= + πr r r
(1) (2) 2 (3) 3
(1) (2) (3)
(1)
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ...
( ) ( ) ( ) ...
( ) ( )NL
P t E t E t E t
P t P t P t
P t P t
= χ + χ + χ + =
= + + + =
= +
r r r rt t t
r r r
r r
( )(1) (1)4 ( ) ( ) 4 ( )NL NLD E P t P t E P t= + π + = ε + πr r r r r r
The susceptibility is a tensor.χt
c.g.s
Substituting in Maxwell equation gives:
Assuming ( , Slowly varying Amplitude) and we get the wave equation in a medium:
Representing the frequency component:
For every n we have:
2 22
2 2 2
1 4( ) PE E Ec t c t
∂ π ∂−∇ +∇ ∇⋅ + = −
∂ ∂
rr r r
2 ( )E E∇ >> ∇ ∇ ⋅r r
2 22
2 2 2
1 4 PE Ec t c t
∂ π ∂−∇ + = −
∂ ∂
rr r
( , ) ( , ) ( ) . .
( , ) ( , ) ( ) . .
n
n
i tn nn n
i tNL NL NLn nn n
E r t E r t E r e c c
P r t P r t P r e c c
− ω
− ω
= = ⋅ +
= = ⋅ +
∑ ∑∑ ∑
r r r
r r r
2 22 (1)
2
4( ) ( ) ( )NLn nn n nE r E r P r
c cω πω
−∇ − ε = −r r
Jcdt
Ddc
H
BdtBd
cE
D
rr
r
r
rr
r
π
πρ
41
0
1
4
+=×∇
=⋅∇
−=×∇
=⋅∇
0=ρ
Properties of the second order susceptibility( ) ( ) ( )2
, ,
, , ( ) ( )i n m ijk n m n m j n k mj k n m
P E Eω + ω = χ ω + ω ω ω ω ω∑ ∑
• Symmetries reduce the number of numbers need to describe .
• is real for Lossless media.• Kleinman symmetry: is far away from
of the media.
For the degenerate case:
( )2χt
( )2χt
( ),n mω ωresonanceω
( ) ( )
( )
2
, ,
3 1 2
( ) ( )
4 ( ) ( )
i n m ijk j n k mj k n m
eff
P E E
P d E E
ω + ω = χ ω ω
ω = ω ω
∑∑
( ) 22 2 ( )P d Eω = ωeff
Theory of classic Sum Frequency GenerationInverse process of Harmonic Difference Generation
2ω1ω
3 1 2ω = ω + ω
Non linear medium1ω
2ω
3ω
( )13 33 3 3, ( )nk n
cω
= = ε ω( )3 33 3( , ) . .i k z tE z t A e c c−ω= +r
We concentrate on the wave, defining:
tikkieff
tieff
ti eeAAdcceEEdccePtzP 32133 )(212133 4..4..),( ωωω −+−− =+=+=
2 22 (1)
2
4( ) ( ) ( )NLn nn n nE r E r P r
c cω πω
−∇ − ε = −r r
Substituting in gives
zkkkieff eAAcd
dzdA
ikzdAd )(
212
233
323
2321
162 −+−=+
ωπ
Slowly varying Amplitude approximation:dzdA
kzdAd 3
323
2
<<
We find the dependency of in and
By the same way we find also that
Non depleting pump approximation:
3A 1A 2A
kzieff eAAck
di
dzdA ∆= 212
3
233 8
ωπ
kzieff eAAck
di
dzdA ∆−= *
2321
211 8
ωπ
kzieff eAAck
di
dzdA ∆−= *
1322
222 8
ωπ
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛∆−
==∆
∆∫ kieAA
ckd
idzeAAck
diLA
kLieff
Lkzieff 188)( 212
3
23
0212
3
23
3
ωπ
ωπ
L =non linear medium length
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ ∆=⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛∆−
==∆
2sinc32164
22222
22
1323
34
32
22
2142
3
43
2232
33
3kLLAA
ck
ndki
eAAck
dcnA
cnI eff
kLieff ω
πω
πππ
213 , AAA <<
( )321 kkkk −+=∆
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ ∆=
2sinc512 22
23321
212
53
kLLcnnn
IIdI eff
λπ
23 3 1 1 1( 2 ) ( )I Iω = ω ∝ ω
Implications:
•The intensity is quadratic in L if .• .•If (Second Harmonic Generation), then
.
0=∆k
3 1 2I I I∝ ⋅1 2ω = ω
Method to achieve phase matching 0321 =−+ kkk
We need to control the refraction index n for every
frequency:• Angle tuning - using birefringence properties of the
nonlinear crystal. (KDP - KH2PO4, BBO - Beta-BaB2O4)
• Temperature tuning(lithium niobate LiNbO3)
• Quasi phase matching(LiNbO3, LiTaO3,
KTP - KTiOPO4)
Phasematching
QuasiPhasematching
No Phasematching
•From Ref. pic [1]
Birefringence 0321 =−+ kkk
332211 ωωω nnn =+
( )3
12123 ωωnnnn −=−
213 ωωω +=
123 ωωω ≥≥assume
For normal dispersion, is rising monotonically )(ωn
Sollution: using birefringence crystal
Sellmeier BBO type 1
)(λn
][ mµλ
)78.0,()39.0,2( mnmn oe µλωµλωθ ===
( )
ωωωωωω
ωωωωω
⋅=====⋅===
===
2),(),(),(2,
2
333331
321
213
ejnejnojnejojj
Example (for type 1 uniaxial)
oejjnjnjn
,),(),(),( 333222111
==+ ωωωωωω
on
en
)(θen
Index ellipsoid for uniaxial crystals
• z is the optical axis (extraordinary).• x, y are ordinary axes.
• Polarization D1 is on the x-y plane and have .
• Polarization D2 have .
en
on
on
kr
12
2
2
2
2
2
=++eoo n
zny
nx
x
y
z
( )θen
θ
on( )θen
( ) ( )2
2
2
2
2
cossin)(
1
oee nnnθθ
θ+=
•From Ref. pic [2]
Properties of birefringence crystals
• For uniaxial crystals:Positive uniaxial Negative uniaxial
Type 1Type 2
• Propagating direction examples:Collinear, non collinear
• Walk off: spatial, temporal.
( )e on n> ( )e on n<
3 3 1 1 2 2o e en n nω = ω + ω 3 3 1 1 2 2e o on n nω = ω + ω
3 3 1 1 2 2o o en n nω = ω + ω 3 3 1 1 2 2e e on n nω = ω + ω
Ko
Ke
classical parametric down conversion is impossible
2/231 ωωω ==
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ ∆=
2sinc512 22
23321
212
53
kLLcnnn
IIdI eff
λπ
If there will be no PDC according to the classical theory.
=> We have to use Quantum mechanics
0)0()0(1 ==== zIzI idler
Non linear medium 3ω
2/32 ωω =3ω
pump Signal, idler
pump
z0
Quantum Hamiltonian for Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion
Classical electrical energy in non linear media:
∫ ∫∫
∫ ∫∫
+⋅+=
=⋅+=
),(
0
)1(332
),(
0
332
)4(),(81),(
81
),(),(81),(
81
trDNL
trD
PEdtrErdrdtrB
trdDtrErdrdtrBH
πεππ
ππ
....)()()(),,;(
)()(),;()();(
32321323211)3(
2212211)2(
111)1(
+−−−−+
+−−+=
ωωωωωωωωωωωχ
ωωωωωωωχωωωχ
lkjijkl
kjijkjiji
EEE
EEEP
∫∫∫
∫∫
∫∫
−′′′′′−′′′′′=
′′′=
++++=
),(),(),(),;(314)(
),(),(),(214)(
...))()((81),(
81
)2(2
)1(1
212)1(332
ωωωωωωωωχωωωπ
ωωωωχωωπ
εππ
rErErEdddrX
rErEddrX
rXrXErdrdtrBH
kjiijk
jiij
Second quantization for the term:
Define:
is the annihilation operator for j,k mode
In the degenerate case, when :
Normal ordering, and assuming classical pump
)(2 rX
jka
ωω ′=
volumenquatizatioV =
)](ˆ)(ˆ)2(ˆ)(ˆ)(ˆ)2(ˆ[ 1101102ωωωωωωχ aaaaaaH X
+++ +∝ h
2021
200 )(ˆ)(ˆ, νν ω <<== − tntnea t
.].)(ˆ)(ˆ[ 20112
cceaaH tiX +∝ −++ ωνωωχh
( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )ωωωωωωωωχωωωπ ,',",',';""'314 2
2 rErErEdddrX kjiijk −−= ∫∫∫( ) ( )
2,1
ˆ)(
==
∑=−+
jVn
E
eaEE
jk
jkjk
k
tkrijkjkj
jk
ω
ω ω
h
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )∫ ++−−−+ −+−∝ )''()'()()''()'()(32
ωωωωχωωωωχ EEEEEErdH X
Coupling constant=χ
Equations of motionSlowly complex mode amplitudes
ti
ti
etat
etat2
1
)(ˆ)(ˆ)(ˆ)(ˆ
22
11
ω
ω
=Α
=Α
)(ˆ)(ˆ]ˆ),(ˆ[1)(ˆ
)(ˆ)(ˆ]ˆ),(ˆ[1)(ˆ
10)(
1022
20)(
2011
021
2
021
2
tietAiHtidt
td
tietAiHtidt
td
ti
ti
+−++
+−++
Α−=−=Α=Α
Α−=−=Α=Α
χνχν
χνχν
ωωωχ
ωωωχ
h
h
θ
θ
θ
νν
νχνχ
νχνχ
νχ
νχ
i
i
i
e
tiett
tiett
tdt
td
tdt
td
||
)sinh()0(ˆ)cosh()0(ˆ)(ˆ)sinh()0(ˆ)cosh()0(ˆ)(ˆ
)(ˆ)(ˆ
)(ˆ)(ˆ
00
01022
02011
22
02
22
2
12
02
21
2
=
Α−Α=Α
Α−Α=Α
Α=Α
Α=Α
+
+
Photon statisticsThe r’th moment of :
For we get the same result:
Result are similar to thermal photon statistics:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
[ ] [ ]( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )tr
rnnnt
t
tie
tiettiet
tttttn
r
r
rrr
rrri
riri
rrrrr
||sinh!
0|ˆ.....2ˆ1ˆ|0||sinh
0|0ˆ0ˆ|0||sinh
0|)0(||sinh
0|)sinh()0(ˆ)cosh()0(ˆ)sinh()0(ˆ)cosh()0(ˆ|0
0|ˆˆ|0|ˆˆ|)(ˆ
02
2,12222,102
2,1222,102
2
2,120
2,1020102012,1
2,1112,1111
νχ
νχ
νχ
νχ
νχνχνχνχ
θ
θθ
=
=>+++<=
=>ΑΑ<=
=>Α−=
=>Α−ΑΑ+Α<=
=>ΑΑ<>=ΨΑΑΨ=<
+
+
+−+
++
)(ˆ1 tn r
)(ˆ2 tn r ( )trtn rr ||sinh!)(ˆ 02
2 νχ=
[ ]( )
( )rr
sk
B
B
ern
TKHtrTKH
1!ˆ
)/ˆexp()/ˆexp(ˆ
,−
=
−−
=
β
ρ
onpolarizatismomentumk
==
)ˆ)...(2ˆ)(1ˆ(ˆ 2222 rnnnn r +++=
Optical Parametric Oscilator• Gain is asymptotically if
exponential if :
• Tunable by changing the phase matching condition, orchanging the cavity’s length.
• Better Finesse
3ωω =p 1ωω =s
2ωω =i
( ) ( ) gzeAzA 021
11 ⇒42
322
12 /64 ckAdg ieffωπ=
0=∆k
•From Ref. pic [1]
Generating of squeezing state using OPO
Signal to noise
Source for single photons
Laser ωcrystalcolineartype 2
P.B.S
Homodyne
detection
H.W.P Q.W.P
ω
2/ω
ω
2/ω >H|
>V|POL
P.B.S: Polarizing Beam SpliterH.W.P: Half Wave PlateQ.W.P: Quarter Wave PlatePOL: polarizer
Source for entanglement photons
Non collinear type 2 SPDC
( )1 2 1 21 | , | ,2
iH V e V HϕΨ = > + >•From Ref. pic [3]
references
• R.W. Boyd, Nonlinear optics, 2nd edition, Academic Press, New York, 2003.• L. Mandel, E Wolf, Optical coherence and Quantum optics, Cambridge university press, New
York, 1995.• Wu L.A, Kimble H.j., Hall J.L., Wu Huifa, Generation of squeezed states by parameteric down
conversion, Phys rev Lett 57, 2520 – 2523, 1986.• Breitenbach G, Schiller S, Mlynek J, Measurement of the quantum states of squeezed light,
Nature, 387, 471-475, 1997. • Rubin M.H., Klyshko D.N., Shin Y.H., Sergienko A.V., Theory of two photon
entanglement in type-II optical parametric down-conversion , Phys. Rev. A 50, 5122-5133 ,1994.• Kwiat P. G., Mattle K., Weinfurter H., Zeilinger A., Sergienko A. V., Shih Y.,
New High-Intensity source of Polarization-entangled photon pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4337-4341, 1995.
• Halevi A., Thesis Work, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2008.
Pictures from:• [1] RP Photonics: http://www.rp-photonics.com/img/qpm.png• [2] http://www.cooper.edu/engineering/projects/gateway/ee/solidmat/modlec3/node8.html• [3] Geiger Mark S. , Keller S. James, Creation and Characterization of entangled photons Via
second Harmonic Generation of Infrared Diodes, Kenyon College, Gambier OH. 2006:http://biology.kenyon.edu/HHMI/posters_2005/GeigerM.jpg