58
Quantum Mechanical Model Systems Erwin P. Enriquez, Ph. D. Ateneo de Manila University CH 47

Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

  • Upload
    rocco

  • View
    34

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Quantum Mechanical Model Systems. Erwin P. Enriquez, Ph. D. Ateneo de Manila University CH 47. Based on mode of motion. Translational motion: Particle in a Box Infinite potential energy barrier: 1D, 2D, 3D Finite Potential energy barrier Free particle Harmonic Oscillator - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Erwin P. Enriquez, Ph. D.Ateneo de Manila University

CH 47

Page 2: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Based on mode of motion

Translational motion: Particle in a Box Infinite potential energy barrier: 1D, 2D, 3D Finite Potential energy barrier Free particle

Harmonic Oscillator Rotational motion

Page 3: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Harmonic Oscillator

Page 4: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Classical Harmonic Oscillator

2

2

( ) sin(2 )

F ma kx

d xm kx

dtx t A t b

Page 5: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Quantum Harmonic Oscillator (H.O.)

2 2 2

2

ˆ

2 2

H E

d kxE

m dx

5 103

0

V x( )

100100 x

2

( )2

kxV x

Schrödinger Equation Potential energy

v = 0,1, 2, 3, …v

1(v )

2E hv

SOLUTION:Allowed energy levels

Page 6: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Solving the H.O. differential equationPower series methodTrial solution:

Substituting in H. O. differential equation:

Rearranging and changing summation indices:

Mathematically, this is true for all values of x iff the sum of the coefficients of xn

is equal to zero. Thus,

rearranging:

2 2

2 2

0

( )qx qx

nn

n

x e f x e c x

2"( ) 2 '( ) 2 ( ) 0f x qf x mE q f x

22

0 0 0

( 2)( 1) 2 2 0n n nn n n

n n n

n n c x q nc x mE q c x

22( 2)( 1) 2 2 0n n nn n c qnc mE q c

2

2

2 2

( 2)( 1)n n

qn mE qc c

n n

2-TERM RECURSION RELATION FOR COEFFICIENTS: Two arbitrary constants co (even) and c1

(odd)

Page 7: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

General solution

• Becomes infinite for very large x as x ∞.

• This is resolved by ‘breaking off’ the power series after a finite number of ters, e.g., when n = v Thus, our recursion relation becomes:

2

2

0

qxn

nn

x e c x

2

2

v 2 v

2 v 20

(v 2)(v 1)

2 v 2 0

1(v )

2

q mE qc c

q mE q

E hv

When n > v, coefficient is zero (truncated series, zero higher terms)

v = 0,1, 2, … also, QUANTIZED E levels

Page 8: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Quantum Harmonic Oscillator

2

2v v v( ) ( )

q

x N H q e

2

kq x

1/ 2

v v

1

2 v!

kN

SOLUTIONv=1

v=2

v=3

v=4

0

1

v 1 v v-1

( ) 1

( ) 2

( ) 2 ( ) 2v ( )

H q

H q q

H q qH q H q

Hermite Polynomialsgenerated through recursion formula

Nomalization constant

Example:

What is

Page 9: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

General properties of H.O. solutions

Equally spaced E levels Ground state = Eo = ½ h (zero-point energy) The particle ‘tunnels’ through classically

forbidden regions The distribution of the particle approaches the

classically predicted average distribution as v becomes large (Bohr correspondence)

Page 10: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Molecular vibration

• Often modeled using simple harmonic oscillator

• For a diatomic molecule:

1 2 1 2

2 2 2 2 21 2

1 2 1 22 21 1 2 2

1 2

ˆ ( , ) ( , )

( )( , ) ( , )

2 2 2

H x x E x x

d d k x xx x E x x

m dx m dx

r x x

In Cartesian system, the differential equation is non-separable. This can be solved by transforming the coordinate system to the Center-of-Mass coordinate and reduced mass coordinates.

Page 11: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

2 2 2 2 21 2

1 2 1 22 21 1 2 2

1 2

1 21 2

1 2

2 2 2 2 2

2 2

( )( , ) ( , )

2 2 2

( , ) ( , )2 2 2

d d k x xx x E x x

m dx m dx

r x x

m mR x x

M MM m m

d d krr R E r R

dr M dR

Reduced mass-CM coordinate system

1 2

1 2

m m

m m

Separable differential equation

Page 12: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

2 2 2 2 2

2 2

2 2 2

2

2 2

2

( , ) ( ) ( )

1 ( ) 1 ( )( )

( ) 2 2 ( ) 2

1 ( )( )

( ) 2 2

1 ( )

( ) 2

r R

r Rr T

r R

rr r

r

RR

R

r R r R

d r kr d Rr E

r dr R M dR

d r krr E

r dr

d RE

R M dR

Separation of variables (DE)

Particle of reduced mass 'motion' (just like Harmonic oscillator case)

Center-of-mass motion, just like Translational motion case

The motion of the diatomic molecule was ‘separated’ into translational motion of center of mass, and

Vibrational motion of a hypothetical reduced mass particle.

Page 13: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

H. O. model for vibration of molecule

• E depends on reduced mass,

• Note: particle of reduced mass is only a hypothetical particle describing the vibration of the entire molecule

1(v )

2

1

2

E hv

kv

Page 14: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

AnharmonicityVibrational motion does not follow the parabolic potential especially at high energies.

CORRECTION:

21 1(v ) (v )

2 2 eE hv hv

e is the anharmonicity constant

Page 15: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Selection rules in spectroscopy

• For excitation of vibrational motions, not all changes in state are ‘allowed’.

• It should follow so-called SELECTION RULES

• For vibration, change of state must corrspond to v= ± 1.

• These are the ‘allowed transitions’.

• Therefore, for harmonic oscillator:

v 1 vE E E hv

Page 16: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

The Rigid Rotor

1. Classical treatment2. Shrödinger equation3. Energy4. Wavefunctions: Spherical Harmonics5. Properties

Page 17: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

The Rigid Rotor

2D (on a plane) circular motion with fixed radius.

3D: Rotational motion with fixed radius (spherical)

The Rigid Rotor

Page 18: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

2

22 2

v2

v

1 1v

2 2 2

drv

dt r

I mr

L m r pr I

LT m I

I

Classical treatment

Motion defined in terms of

• Angular velocity

• Moment of inertia

• Angular momentum

• Kinetic energy

The Rigid Rotor

Linear velocity Linear

frequency

Page 19: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Quantum mechanical treatmentShrödinger equation

Laplacian operator in Spherical Coordinate System

2

2

22

22 2

2 2 2 2 2

ˆ ( , , ) ( , , )

ˆ ˆ ( , , ) ( , , )

( , , ) ( , , )2

( , , ) ( , , )2

1 1 1sin

sin sin

H x y z E x y z

T V x y z E x r z

x y z E x y zm

r E rm

RR R R R R

The Rigid Rotor

In spherical coordinate system

Page 20: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

2 22

2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1sin ( , , ) ( , , )

2 sin sinR R E R

m R R R R R

2 2

2 2 2

2

( , , ) ( ) ( , )

1 1sin ( , ) ( , )

2 sin sin

ˆ ( , ) ( , )

( 1)

20,1,2,...

0, 1,...,

m ml l

R R r Y

Y EYmR

HY EY

l lE

Il

m l

Substituting into Schrodinger equation:

Since R is fixed and by separation of variable:

SOLUTION:

SPHERICAL HARMONICS

(Table 9.2: Silbey)

l = azimuthal quantum number

Degeneracy = 2l+1

The Rigid Rotor

Page 21: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Plots of spherical harmonics and the corresponding square functions

From WolframMathWorld (just Google ‘Spherical harmonics’

Page 22: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Notes:

• E is zero (lowest energy) because, there is maximum uncertainty for first state given by

• We do not know where exactly is the particle (anywhere on the surface of the ‘sphere’)

00

1

4Y

The Rigid Rotor

Page 23: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

For a two-particle rigid rotor

• The two coordinate system can be Center of Mass and Reduced Mass

• since radius is fixed, the distance between the two particles R is also fixed

• The kinetic energy for rotational motion is:

• The result is the same: Spherical Harmonics as wavefunctions (but using reduced mass)

2 2

22 2

L LT

I R

The Rigid Rotor

Page 24: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Angular momentum and the Hydrogen Atom

Page 25: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Angular Momentum

• This is a physical observable (for rotational motion)

• A vector (just like linear momentum)

• Recall: right-hand rule

• L2 =L∙ L=scalar

L

x y z

x z y

y x z

z y x

i j k

L r p x y z

p p p

L yp zp

L zp xp

L xp yp

The Rigid Rotor

Page 26: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Angular momentum operators

2 2 2 2

22 2

2 2

ˆ

ˆ

ˆ

ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ

1 1ˆ sinsin sin

x

y

z

x y z

L i y zz y

L i z xx z

L i x yy x

L L L L

L

NOTE: SAME AS FOR RIGID ROTOR CASE

Page 27: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Angular momentum eigenfunctions

Are the spherical harmonics:

l =0,1,2,…

m=0, ±1,…, ±l

The z-component is also

solved (Lx and Ly are

Uncertain)

2 2

2

ˆ ( , ) ( , )

= ( 1) ( , )

m ml l

ml

L Y L Y

l l Y

ˆ ( , ) ( , )m mz l lL Y m Y

REMINDER: SKETCH ON THE BOARD. FIGURE 9.9 and 9.10 SILBEY

Page 28: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

RECALL: HCl rotational energies (l is called J)

Angular momentum and rotational kinetic energy

RECALL 2 2

22 2

L LT

I R

2

2

ˆˆ

2

LT

R

2

ˆ ( , ) ( , )

( 1)

2

m ml lHY EY

l lE

I

The spherical harmonics are eigenfunctions of both Hamiltonian and Angular Momemtum Square operators.

Page 29: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Hydrogen Atom

Page 30: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

To be solved to get the wavefunction

for the electron

H-atom: A two-body problem: electron and nucleus

2

2 2 22 2

22

ˆ ( , , , , , ) ( , , , , , )

ˆ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( )4

1 1( ) ( ) ( )

( ) 2 4 ( ) 2

1( )

( ) 2

1

(

e e e N N N e e e N N N

N N N N

o

CM CM To CM CM

CM CM CMCM CM

H x y z x y z E x y z x y z

H q q E q q

ZeV r

r

Zeq q q E

q r q M

q Eq M

q

2 22 ( )

) 2 4 o

e N e Ne

e N N

Zeq E

r

m m m mm

m m m

Note that the reduced mass is approx. mass of e-. Thus

e

describes translational motion of entire atom (center of mass motion)

Page 31: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Shrödinger equation for electron in H-atom

2 2 22

2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1sin ( , , ) ( , , )

2 sin sin 4 e ee o

Zer r E r

m r r r r r r

24 2

2 3 2 2

( , , ) ( ) ( , )

1,2,...

0,1,..., 1

0, 1,...,

4 (4 )

me nl l

ydn

o

r R r Y

n

l n

m l

R Ze ZE

c n n

RADIAL FUNCTIONS (depends on quantum numbers n and l

SPHERICAL HARMONICS

Quantized energy (as predicted by Bohr as well), Ryd = Rydberg constant.

E depends only on n

Degenerary = 2n2E1s = -13.6 eV

Page 32: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems
Page 33: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Hydrogen atom wavefunctions

• Are called atomic orbitals• Technically atomic orbital is a wavefunction = • Given short-cut names nl:

• When l = 0, s orbitall = 1 p l = 2, d

3

2

1

11 o

Zr

as

o

Zs e

a

Page 34: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

• Probability density =

• Radial probability density (r part only)= gives probability density of finding electron at given distances from the nucleus

Probability =

• The spherical harmonics squared gives ‘orientational dependence’ of the probability density for the electron:

Plotting the H-atom wavefunction

2 2 ( )nl

r R r dr

22 2 ( ) ( , )nl

me lR r Y

2( , )m

lY

Page 35: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Radial probability density (or radial distribution function)

See also Figure 10.5 Silbey

Node for 2s orbitalNodes for 3s orbital

Bohr radius, ao

Page 36: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Electron cloud picture1s 2s 3s

2p

Page 37: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Shapes of (orbitals)

NOTE:

This is not yet the 2.

Page 38: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Shapes of (orbitals)

Page 39: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Properties for Hydrogen-like atom

• H, He+, Li2+

• Energy depends only on n

• Degeneracy: 2n2 degenerate state (including spin)

• The energies of states of different l values are split in a magnetic field (Zeeman effect) due to differences in orbital angular momentum

• The atom acts like a small magnet: eL

Magnetic dipole moment

Magnetogyric ratio of the electron

Orbital angular momentum

Page 40: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Electron spin

• Spin is purely a relativistic quantum phenomenon (no classical counterpart)

• Shown by Dirac in 1928 as a relativistic effect and observed by Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck in 1920 to explain the splitting (fine structure) of spectroscopic lines

• There is a intrinsic SPIN ANGULAR MOMENTUM, S for the electron which also generates a spin magnetic moment:

• The spin state is given by s=1/2 for the electron, and with two possible spin orientations given by ms = +1/2 or -1/2 (spin up or spin down)

• Spin has no classical observable counterpart, thus, the operators are postulated, and follows closely that of the angular momentum (Table 10.2 of Silbey)

2e

e

g eS

m

ge = 2.002322, electron g factor

Page 41: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Pauli Exclusion Principle

• The wavefunction of any system of electrons must be antisymmetric with respect to the interchange of any two electrons

• The complete wavefunction including spin must be antisymmetric:

• In other words, each hydrogen-like state can be multiplied by a spin state of up or down

• Thus, “No two electrons can occupy the same state = otherwise, each must have different spins” or “no two electrons in an atom can have the same 4 quantum numbers n, l, ml, ms.”

( , , ) ( )sr g m Spatial part Spin part

Page 42: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

More complicated systems…

MANY-ELETRON ATOMS

Page 43: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

He atom

• Three-body problem (non-reducible)

• Not solved exactly!

• Use VARIATIONAL THEOREM to find approximate solutions

2 2 2 2

2 21 2

1 2 12

1ˆ2 4e o

Ze Ze eH

m r r r

+2

-

-

r12r1

r2

ˆ| |gsE f H f

Kinetic energy of e-s

Electrostatic repulsion between e’s and attraction of each to nucleus

Page 44: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Variational Theorem (or principle)

• One of the approximation methods in quantum mechanics• States that the expectation value for energy generated for any

function is greater than or equal to the ground state energy

• Any function f is a “Trial Function” that can be used, and can be parameterized (f = f(a)) wherein a can be adjusted so that the lowest E is obtained.

ˆ| | gsf H f E

Page 45: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

He-atom approximation• As a first approximation, neglect the e-e repulsion

part. 2 2 2

2 21 2

1 2

2 2 2 22 21 2

1 2

1 2

1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2

1 2

1 2 1 1 1 2

1ˆ 2 4

1 1ˆ 2 4 2 4

ˆ ˆ ˆ

ˆ

ˆ

( ) ( )

e o

e o e o

He s s

Ze ZeH

m r r

Ze ZeH

m r m r

H H H

H E

H E

E E E

r r

2

12

e

r

Page 46: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Applying variational principle

• Calculating the ‘expectation value from this trial function’ yields:

• 2E1s=8(-13.6) eV=-108.8 eV

• Subtracting repulsive energy of two electrons by evaluating:

• Total energy is -74.8 eV versus experimental -79.0 eV.

1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2ˆ( ) ( ) | | ( ) ( )calculated s s s sE r r H r r

2*

1 212

34.04 o

ed d eV

r

Page 47: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Parameterization of the trial function

• The trial wavefunction may be ‘improved’ by parameterization

• For the He atom, the ‘effective nuclear charge’ Z is introduced in the trial wavefunction and its value is adjusted to get the lowest variational energy:

1 2 1 2ˆ( , ; ) | | ( , ; )

0calcd q q Z H q q Z dE

dZ dZ

Page 48: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Going back to Pauli exclusion… implications…

Page 49: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Permutation operator

• Permutation operator

• Permutation operator squared

• Eigenvalues

• f is symmetric function

• f is antisymmetric

12

212

212

12

12

ˆ ( (1,2)) (2,1)

ˆ ( (1,2)) 1 (1,2)

1

ˆ ( (1,2)) 1 (1,2)

ˆ ( (1,2)) 1 (1,2)

P f f

P f f

P

P f f

P f f

Page 50: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Including spin states

( 1/ 2)

( 1/ 2)

g

g

( , , ) ( )sr g m

(1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (2) (1)

SINGLE ELECTRON SYSTEM

TWO- ELECTRON SYSTEM (e.g., He atom:

SEATWORK 1: Which of the functions above are antisymmetric, symmetric?

Page 51: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Linear combination of spin functions

1/ 2 (1) (2) (2) (1)

1/ 2 (1) (2) (2) (1)

SEATWORK TWO: Are these antisymmetric functions?

Page 52: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Therefore for the ground state He atom

1 (1)1 (2) 1/ 2 (1) (2) (2) (1) s s SPATIAL PART

SPIN PART

Page 53: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Fermions and Bosons Quantum particles of half-integral spins are called

FERMIONSS = ½, 3/2, etc. (two spin states, plus or minus)

-requires antisymmetric functions-follows Fermi-Dirac statistics

Quantum particles with integral spins are called BOSONS

S = 1, 2, etc.-requires symmetric functions-follows Bose-Einstein statistics

SEATWORK 2b: What are electrons? Protons?

Page 54: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Slater determinants and STO

• Slater in 1929 proposed using determinants of spin functions for the spin part

1 (1) (1) 1 (1) (1)1/ 2

1 (2) (2) 1 (2) (2)

s s

s s

Atomic wavefunctions that use hydrogenic functions in a Slater determinant are called Slater-type Orbitals (STO)

Page 55: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

First excited state of He• Triply degenerate because of the spin states

1

2

3

1/ 2 1 (1)2 (2) 1 (2)2 (1) (1) (2)

1/ 2 1 (1)2 (2) 1 (2)2 (1) (1) (2) (2) (1)

1/ 2 1 (1)2 (2) 1 (2)2 (1) (1) (2)

s s s s

s s s s

s s s s

Antisymmetric spatial part This time, symmetric spin part

MULTIPLICITY = 2S +1S = total spin angular momentaTRIPLET M = 3 parallel spins for 2 e’sSINGLET M =1 opposite spins for 2 e’s

SEATWORK 3: What is that principle called, when the lower energy state consists of parallel spins in separate degenerate orbitals? (No erasure please… on your answer)

Page 56: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field (HF-SCF) Method

Variational methodTrial function for electronic wavefunction:

V is a ‘smeared’ out potential due to all the electrons

1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 n n

22

=g (r , , )g (r , , )...g (r , , )

( ) ( , )

( )2

i

i

n n

mi i i l i i

i i i i ii

g R r Y

V r g gm

Page 57: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Spin-Orbit coupling Coupling of the spin angular momentum S and orbital angular momentum L

Page 58: Quantum Mechanical Model Systems

Atomic units

• Short-cut way to write Shrodinger equation is to not include constants… values obtained are generic ‘atomic units’ which can be converted back…

• Table 10.7 Silbey

• E.g., 1a .u. of length is = 1 Bohr radius = 0.052 Å

21

2

ZE

r

SEATWORK 4: What is the length (in Angstroms) equivalent to 3.5 atomic unit of length?

-13.6 eV is how much in a. u.? (look up in Silbey)