14
Quantium Technology Michael J. Marquis MKTG518 Case Study II

Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Quantium Technology

Michael J. Marquis

MKTG518 Case Study II

Page 2: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Case Overview

In 2004, Anne Rothman named new Executive Vice President of Global Sales

Quantium Technology’s biggest challenge: Sales Force Automation (SFA)

In 2002, Quantium purchased Siebel Sales, an SFA software solution

Big price tag and even bigger problems with Siebel Sales:

1. Sales reps abandoning system

2. Sales managers state pipeline data not accurate

3. System unable to increase win rates

4. Does not shorten sales cycle

5. No company buy-in

6. Customer experience still compromised

Rothman interviews sales & IT to determine what went wrong.

Page 3: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Quantium Technology’s Background

Provides computer hardware & software for large enterprises

Founded in 1989

Server market suffers from late 1990’s to early 2000’s

Strong competition from Dell Computer, IBM, Hewlett-Packard & Sun Microsystems

Competitors highly successful at “solution selling” (hardware, software and services)

Quantium success tied to Internet & dot-com companies

In 2000, height of Internet boom: $3.6 billion in revenue

In 2003, post dot-com bust: $2.2 billion in revenue

Page 4: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Quantium Technology’s Sales Organization

Sales Reps (Client Executives) in designated markets/assigned territories

U.S., Europe, Middle East, Africa, the Americas, Asia Pacific

Each sales rep had $2 million annual quota

Different types of sales reps: client needs, product specialists (high-speed servers), and industry-focused (financial services)

Sales Engineers provided tech support

Eric Mather ran Quantium sales org from 93’ – 04’

Consistently failed to meet sales quota during bust

Built sales force but lacked skills to turn things around

Left Quantium end of 03’

Page 5: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Supporting Facts: SFA Project (Siebel Systems, Inc.)

Siebel Systems, Inc., founded in 1993, became leader in CRM enterprise software

Siebel Sales’ SFA software provided a “tool for companies to automate and integrate business processes in marketing, sales and service.”

“A tool to automate workflow across the entire sales process.” In 2003, revenues of more than $1.35 billion Notable customers: Bank of America, British Telecom, Deutsche Bank,

DHL, HP, IBM, and Microsoft Siebel System Features: Scripts for prospecting Tools for collaboration Contact management systems Centralized customer databases Analytical tool for sales forecasting Pipeline management

Page 6: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Why Quantium Chose Siebel Sales…

Centralized customer info across the company Provided sales managers and executives insight into

sales pipeline Eliminated revenue surprises Gave global sales org common language Standardized sales processes Strong analytics package for sales managers

Page 7: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Quantium Technology’s IT Plan of Attack

Jacob Tate, Director of IT Special Projects Implement Siebel Sales ASAP Roll out to sales force all at once Customize analytics dashboard and forecasting

tools (against Siebel Consultants suggestion) Increase integration between SFA database and Quantium’s back office databases Once launched, training program for 2,000 sales

managers and reps

Page 8: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Siebel Sales’ Strengths

Pipeline Visibility (sales opportunities, forecasting, pipeline analysis) Sales Effectiveness (customer profiles, quotes,

proposals, presentations) Motivation & Focus (quota plans, incentive plans, compensation plans) Analytics Engine (dashboard to view data in the

sales process) Best Practices (Siebel target account selling, Siebel

enterprise selling process)

Page 9: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

No clear differentiation

between sales reps

Managers with little to no insight into the

org

Culture is disconnected

making change difficult

Poor training on new systems

Siebel Tech support MIA during transition

Launch of Siebel Sales was too fast –

no testing

Quantium’s technology

infrastructure too complex

Quantium’s Weaknesses

Page 10: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Organizational culture change: new system = new devotion to company and its support systems

Quantium can segment its work force according to product/service offerings

Seamless entry into “solution selling” market

Greater database forecasting equates to revamped sales quotas

Shorter sales cycle with adoption of Siebel Sales

Quality assurance across all Quantium Tech locations

Centralized database to house valuable customer data

Accurate revenue projections for management (no more surprises)

Greater brand loyalty via satisfied customers; repeat business = greater profits

Opportunities

Page 11: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Threats

Internal Threats:

Sales reps unable to reach quota w/Siebel Sales

Sales managers will little insight into company

Technology change during shift from product company to solutions company

Information is unreliable on Siebel Sales (pipeline inaccurate)

Consistent loss of valuable customer data

No company buy-in of new system

Continued performance issues w/speed External Threats: Competitors monopolizing server market Cheaper servers and workstations threaten Quantium market

presence Movement toward service business instead of products “Solution selling” is longer sales process = more resources

Page 12: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Instant performance problems with Siebel Sales launch Launched was too fast and to entire sales force Customization to Quantium Technology was not suggested but done anyway –

cause of system issues Quantium’s existing technology infrastructure was a major issue (outdated

system supporting smaller sales offices) Data in new SFA pipeline useless Data did not accurately reflect true picture of sales situation in the field Win rates projected at 80 – 90%, in reality they were 35 -30% New deals not showing up in system Lack of Employee Buy-In Training was not widespread – only 75% of sales reps Independent reps reluctant to enter sales data: “Big Brother” Reps kept their own customer contact spreadsheets in lieu of Siebel Reps felt new system was tax on time Customers continued to suffer with miscommunication from sales reps

Stated Conclusion From Case

Page 13: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Prior to launching new SFA initiative, clearly define company objectives to all departments Company-wide training for all parties using the system Dispel any myths about “Big Brother”- type system Prior to launching new software system, set up testing environment to

ensure compatibility Simplify technology infrastructure to ensure optimal performance Adjust sales quotas/performance to ensure fairness between job

types Assess then clearly illustrate the impact of Siebel Sales during first few

weeks of launch (increase buy-in) Keep Siebel Sales consultants on board during initial launch phase Have back-up SFA system in place

Recommendations

Page 14: Quantium TechnologyMichael J. MarquisMKTG518 Case Study II

Reference:

Nunn, D., Lattin, J. & Leslie, M. (2005). Implementing Sales Force Automation at Quantium Technology. Stanford Graduate School of Business. Case M-311. Nov. 5, 2005.