27
Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well in Well - - Test Analysis Test Analysis n-dimensional Statistical Inverse Graphical Hydraulic Test Simulator nSIGHTS Randall Roberts, Richard Beauheim, and John Avis GeoSym '07 Sacramento, CA May 9, 2007

Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    11

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company,for the United States Department of Energy under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

Quantifying Parameter UncertaintyQuantifying Parameter Uncertaintyin Wellin Well--Test AnalysisTest Analysis

n-dimensional Statistical Inverse Graphical Hydraulic Test Simulator

nSIGHTS

Randall Roberts, Richard Beauheim, and John AvisGeoSym '07

Sacramento, CA May 9, 2007

Page 2: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

Definition: Well-test Analysis

•Well-test analysis is the process by which hydraulic parameters of interest are inferred from transient flow and pressure data

•Well-test analysis is an Inverse ProblemInverse Problem

Page 3: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

Dealing with Uncertainty

•Uncertainty is an inherent quality of an inverse problem

•For a given conceptual model, uncertainty results from correlation among the fitting parameters, noise in the data, and correlation among fitting and non-fitting parameters

Page 4: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

Quantifying Uncertainty

•There are relatively simple methods for quantifying the uncertainty in fitting-parameter estimates

•These methods can be used to designhydraulic tests, optimize data collection, and minimize uncertainty

Page 5: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 6: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 7: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 8: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

Conceptual Model

• Infinite acting, homogeneous, isotropic•Wellbore storage, no skin•Fitting Parameters:

– Hydraulic Conductivity – K (m/s)– Specific Storage – Ss (m-1)– Flow geometry – n ( )– Test-Zone Compressibility – Ctz (Pa-1)

Page 9: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 10: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 11: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 12: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 13: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 14: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

Perturbation Analysis:A Method for Quantifying Uncertainty

•The baseline values of the fitting parameters are randomly perturbed and then re-optimized a specified number of times

Page 15: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 16: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

Mapping Parameter Space

•Perturbation Analysis was used to map the parameter-space minima (solution sets) for each of the three constraints

•Provides information on how each constraint influences the final solution

Page 17: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 18: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

Multiple Minima:Local and Global

•When there is difficulty matching some part of a data set, perturbation analysis will often reveal multiple minima

Page 19: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 20: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 21: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 22: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

Complementary ConstraintsUncertainty can be reduced by using constraints with differing fitting-parameter correlations

Page 23: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 24: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 25: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis
Page 26: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

Test Design

•Knowledge of the parameter-space characteristics can be used to design/optimize hydraulic tests– Test types can be combined to minimize

uncertainty by identifying complementary constraints

Page 27: Quantifying Parameter Uncertainty in Well-Test Analysis

Summary and Conclusions

•The uncertainty that is inherent in well-test analysis can and should be quantified

•Hydraulic tests can be designed to save time, money, and reduce uncertainty

•Testing and analysis should be integrated•Analysis should be performed in real time