Upload
aubrey-cole
View
218
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quality of Care
Steven B. Clauser, Ph.D. Chief, Outcomes Research Branch, NCI
Applied Research Program
Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences
NCCCP “Kick off” Meeting
June 25, 2007
NCI Cancer Care Delivery and Outcomes Group
• Steven Clauser, PhD (co-chair)• Arnie Potosky, PhD (co-chair) • Ted Trimble, MD, MPH (co-chair) • Tanya Agurs-Collins, PhD• Neeraj Arora, PhD• Rachel Ballard-Barbash, MD, MPH• Martin Brown, PhD• Andrea Denicoff, RN• Brenda Edwards, PhD • Paul Han, MD • Diana Jeffrey, PhD
• Joseph Kelaghan, PhD • Jon Kerner, PhD• Sarah Kobrin, PhD• Lenora Johnson, MPH• Holly Massett, PhD• Helen Meissner, PhD • Cherie Nichols, PhD• Julia Rowland, PhD• Stephen Taplin, MD, MPH• Emmanuel Taylor, PhD• Cynthia Vinson, MA
Quality of Care Relates to Several Other NCCCP Components
InformationTechnologies
Quality of
Care
Survivorshipand
PalliativeCare
Multi-Disciplinary
Practice
Disparities
Clinical Trials
• The degree to which health services for patients and populations
• -increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes,
• Are consistent with current professional knowledge, and
• Provide coordination and continuity of care throughout the entire cancer experience
Knowledge-based
Patient-Centered
Systems-minded
What is quality?
To what extent is NCCCP cancer care
knowledge-based?
Prevention Detection Diagnosis Treatment Survivorship End of Life - Primary - Screening - Imaging - Local - Monitor health - Treatments
- Prognostic - Systemic and HRQOL - Palliation
Biomarkers - Trials - Recurrence - Hospice
- Testing - Second - Biopsy Primary
• Identify evidence-based guidelines• Compare treatment delivered to guidelines• Evaluate degree of guideline adherence
To what extent is NCCCP cancer care patient centered?
• “Global” definition centers around provider-patient relationship and communication—understanding patient as a “whole person”– Global metrics include all outcomes of interest to patient – survival,
satisfaction with care, and health-related quality of life
• Picker Institute defines patient-centered care more broadly:· fast access to reliable health advice· effective treatment delivered by staff you can trust · involvement in decisions and respect for patients' preferences · clear, comprehensible information and support for self-care · physical comfort and a clean, safe environment · empathy and emotional support · involvement of family and friends and support for careers· continuity of care and smooth transitions
Is NCCCP cancer care systems-minded?
Process of Care OUTCOMES
Re
cru
itO
utr
ea
ch
& I
nre
ac
h
Org
an
ize
sc
ree
nin
g
Org
an
ize
F
oll
ow
-up
Cla
rify
Dia
gn
os
tic
E
va
lua
tio
n
Cla
rify
re
ferr
al
pro
ce
ss
a
nd
ed
uc
ati
on
Ide
nti
fy a
nd
ch
ara
cte
rize
p
op
ula
tio
n
Risk Assessment
Diagnosis
Cancer or Precursor Treatment
Detection
Intermediate
Long-term
POTENTIAL for improvement at TRANSITIONS ( ) or DURING TYPES of CARE DELIVERY ( )
Cla
rify
Tre
atm
en
t re
so
urc
es
Cla
rify
su
rviv
ors
hip
re
so
urc
es
an
d s
up
po
rt
Org
an
ize
Sc
ree
nin
g
NCCCP quality of care is affected by multiple levels of influence
B. COMMUNITY Leadership, Advocacy Groups’ expectations, Population affluence, Insurance coverage, Geographic and public resources/access barriers, Market pressures; Care delivery/management practices
A. NATIONAL NCI expectations and leadership, Public Policy/Regulations, Purchaser Requirements/changes, Professional Group Standards/Accreditation
C. PILOT GRANTEE Leadership, Resources, Structure, Procedures, Systems, Culture
OUTCOME
Patient: Health Status Satisfaction Quality of Life System: Efficiency Equity Effectiveness
Information S
ystems
PATIENT (and family)
CHARACTERISTICS
ENCOUNTERS
INTERACTIONS
CONTACTS
PATIENT ADHERENCE
CLINICIAN/TEAM CHARACTERISTICS
Delivery Site: Leadership, Systems, Organization
Information Systems
Strategic Approach
• Changing health care systems is the process of moving from the complex to the obvious in time consuming and expensive steps
• NCCCP proposed interventions therefore need to emphasize “off the shelf” and turn key solutions with high potential yield to both NCI and the pilot sites
• Also, need pilot site champions for buy-in and to move initiatives forward
QoC Workgroup Program Principles
• Assess sites needs for internal program quality improvement – Complements external program focus on health disparities – Complement whenever possible NCCCP quality-related initiatives in
clinical trials and survivorship • Create infrastructure for sustained and ongoing quality
improvement to support clinical and patient-centered performance – Enhanced multi-disciplinary QI teams – Enhanced patient support programs based on patient perspective of
needs – Measurement, intervention, feedback on select initiatives
• Compare results to pilot, NCCCP program, and national program trends
Key Quality of Care Program Components
• Baseline Assessments of Quality Improvement (QI) Resources/Capabilities – Enhance NCCCP infrastructure to support and maintain QI activities – Focus on select opportunities linked to national or NCI initiatives
• QI Initiatives to Improve Evidence-based Care and Patients’ Satisfaction and Experience – Sites select opportunities and improvement goals within broad NCI
framework • Baseline and Follow-up Assessments of both
Process and Outcome improvement – Compare when possible to site baseline, NCCCP program
experience, and similar national programs
Specific Research Questions
• Have the multi-disciplinary QI teams enhanced performance on systems-based measures?– Referral for adjuvant therapy – Provision of treatment summaries to patients
• Have the quality improvement initiatives increased adherence to evidence-based practice? – Is there consistent improvement across sites? – How does their improvement in clinical care compare to
similar national providers or programs?• Are tailored patient education/support programs
associated with improved patient experience and quality of life?