Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quality Function Deployment
R i c h a r d C o w a n , P h . D. , P. E .C h r i s t o p h e r S a l d a n a , P h . D.W o o d r u f f S c h o o l o f M e c h a n i c a l E n g i n e e r i n gG e o r g i a I n s t i t u t e o f T e c h n o l o g yA t l a n t a , G e o r g i a , U S A
2
Phases of Design
CustomerUnderstand the Design Process
Specification DevelopmentSpecification of Information
Conceptual DesignSpecification of a PrincipleFunctional DecompositionGenerate ConceptsConcept EvaluationConcept SelectionPreliminary Design/Embodiment
Detail Design
Specification of ProductionProcess Planning
Manufacture
3
● airlines
● passengers
● flight attendants
● pilots
● ground crew
● TSA
● air traffic control
● FAA
● and many others….
Who is the Customer for this System?
4
● Focus Groups● One-on-One Interviews● Ethnography (culture)● Empathic design (feelings)● Many others...
Customer needs are found by asking, observing, and testing
https://www.coolcamping.co.uk/features/35-the-rise-rise-of-inflatable-tents
Lin, J., and Seepersad, C., 2007, “Empathic Lead Users: The Effects of Ex- traordinary User Experiences on Customer Needs Analysis and Product Rede- sign,” ASME DETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Las Vegas, NV, ASME, New York, Paper No. DETC2007-35302.
7
Basic:• Expected or assumed (threshold attributes)• Typical of “invisible” products• Functions of products
Performance:• One dimensional• Most market research
Excitement:• Pleasant surprises or customer delights• Unexpected
Three Types of Quality/Features
7
8
Customer needs are specific, positive, and solution-neutral
MIT OpenCourseWare: Thomas A. Roemer
9
Question Customer Statement Interpreted Need ImportanceTypical uses • Independent use by student • Operable by person with
disabilities• (must) 4
Likes • Portable, Mobile• Auditory sound provided when page is
turned• Adjustable stand for different book sizes
• Portable• Signals when performing desired
actions• Adjusts to different book sizes
• (good) 3
Dislikes • Used so much that we wore it out• Heavy• Need consistent page turning
• Lightweight• Repairable by staff• Easily replaceable parts• Predictable page turning• Low failure rate• Long mean time between failures
• (good) 3• (good) 3• (must) 4• (must) 4• (should) 2
Suggested Improvements
• Built in delay for multiple button pushes• Be able to turn newspaper pages• Be able to turn scrapbook pages• Multiple students can share
• Turns variety of page types• Accounts for accidental, repeat
button pushes• Operable by multiple persons
• (should) 2• (good) 3• (must) 4
Customer Needs (e.g., Page Turner)
10
From Customer Needs to Specifications
Engineering Requirements and Specifications Translate Voice of the Customer to Technology
11
QFD is a design planning tool:• for translating customer needs into appropriate product development
requirements• that identifies the significant item(s) on which to focus time, product
improvement efforts and other resources
QFD enables:• the identification of important issues and items• the identification of trade-offs and synergies
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
Supplier SupplierCustomer Customer
QFD
12
• Design tool for coordinating design efforts towards goods customers WANT
• House of quality (HOQ) is part of QFD
• Focus on quality and customer needs across the design process and across corporate boundaries
• Guide design priorities based on customer needs and competitive benchmarking
• Over 70% of US companies use QFD (Ford, Xerox, Toyota …)
House of Quality (HOQ)
13
Effect of QFD on Performance
HOQ Images from: Hauser, J.R., and D. Clausing, “The House of Quality,” Harvard Business Review, May/June 1988, pp. 63-73.
Changes = Money Earlier Changes = Less Money Spent
14
Customer desires (qualitative)
House of Quality (HOQ)
Product performance (quantitative)
Specification is a:Metric with Target Value & unitsmass < 0.1 kg volume < 250 cm3
Customer Needs Engineering Requirements and Specifications
HOQ
HOQ Translates Needs to Specifications
15
House of Quality (HOQ) components
(4) CENTERMetrics vs.
Customer Needs (relationships)
(5) BOTTOMMetric Targets
(engineering specification targets)
(3) CEILINGMetrics
(for customer need fulfillment)
(1) LEFTWeighted Customer
Needs
(6) TOPConflicts & Synergies
(2) RIGHTCustomer
Perceptions(of products &
concepts)
direction of improvement
• Customer needs/perceptions
• Engineering metrics/requirements• Targets
• Direction of improvement
• Conflict/synergies
• Relationship matrix
• Correlation matrix
16
Customer needs/perceptions:• These are the ‘whats’• Assigned numerical importance (e.g., 1 to 10)
Engineering metrics/requirements:• These are the ‘hows’• Determine most important ones using Relationships• Determine synergies/conflicts with Correlations
Relationship matrix (RM):• Maps relationship between ‘hows’ and ‘whats’• Quantitative relationship levels (e.g., 1, 3 and 9)
Correlation matrix (CM):• Maps correlation between engineering requirements• Strong positive, positive, negative, strong negative
House of Quality (HOQ) components
16
17
Relationship Matrix in HOQ
Engi
neer
ing
Requ
irem
ents
Customer Requirements (Explicit and
Implicit) adju
stab
le r
ange
of d
imen
sion
s
forc
e on
the
page
rate
of w
ear
of c
ompo
nent
s
# sp
ecia
lty c
ompo
nent
s
# to
ols
need
ed to
rep
air
gran
ular
ity o
f pag
e tu
rnin
g co
ntro
l
erro
r ra
te in
pag
e tu
rnin
g
▼ ▲
operable by person with disabilities
Portable/Mobile
Signals when performing desired actions
lightweight
repairable by staff
easily replaceable parts
num
ber
of a
ssem
bly
and
disa
ssem
bly
orie
erro
r in
alig
ning
par
ts
tole
ranc
e of
use
r-in
itate
d m
otio
ns
grip
forc
e re
quir
ed o
f ope
rato
r
tota
l mas
s
carr
ying
dim
ensi
ons
audi
tory
vol
ume
of s
igna
ls
mat
ch s
igna
ls w
ith u
ser
gene
rate
d ac
tion
inte
nsity
of v
isua
l sig
nals
predictable page turning
low failure rate
safely handles variety of reading materials
●
▽ ●
○○ ○
●● ● ●
●● ○
○ ●●
●○
●
▼▼ ▼Direction of Improvement ▲ ▼ ▼ ▲▼ ▼ ▼ ◇ ◇ ◇ ▼
what
how
18
Correlation Matrix in HOQ
force on the page
tolerance of user-initated motions
grip force required of operator
total mass
carrying dimensions
auditory volume of signals
match signals with user generated actions
intensity of visual signals
mber of assembly and disassembly orientati
error in aligning parts
# specialty components
# tools needed to repair
granularity of page turning control
error rate in page turning
rate of wear of components
adjustable range of dimensions
+
−
erro
r ra
te in
pag
e tu
rnin
g
−
# to
ols
need
ed to
rep
air
gran
ular
ity o
f pag
e tu
rnin
g c
Column #
tole
ranc
e of
use
r-in
itate
d m
o
grip
forc
e re
quir
ed o
f ope
rato
tota
l mas
s
rate
of w
ear
of c
ompo
nent
s
adju
stab
le r
ange
of d
imen
sio
forc
e on
the
page
carr
ying
dim
ensi
ons
audi
tory
vol
ume
of s
igna
ls
mat
ch s
igna
ls w
ith u
ser
gene
inte
nsity
of v
isua
l sig
nals
num
ber
of a
ssem
bly
and
disa
erro
r in
alig
ning
par
ts
# sp
ecia
lty c
ompo
nent
s
Engineering requirements
19
20
Target Values for Engineering Requirements
20
Determine how specific values for engineering requirements influence satisfaction of customer needs
• Scientific studies • Survey tests• Focus groups• Refer to standards organizations
(NIOSH, OSHA, NIST, ASTM, etc)
Coffee grind example
21
What• Hot• Taste/flavor• Smell• Stimulating• Aesthetics• Color• Cost• Grind• Not toxic
HOQ Example (e.g., Coffee)
How• Serving temperature (Hot)• Taste jury (Taste)• Smell jury (Smell)• Measure caffeine level
(Stimulating)• Jury (Aesthetics)• Color standard (Color)• Price (Cost)• Filter & weight (Grind)• Lethal Dose 50% (Median, LD 50)
22
Cup of Coffee House of Quality (Filled)
Matrix Weights• Strong, = 9• Medium, = 3• Weak, ∆ = 1
• The 181 from column 1 comes from:
• The sum of the Absolute Importance row is:
• The 0.27 in the first column of the Relative Importance row comes from:
22
181 132 54 99 18 108 90 682+ + + + + + =
181682
0 2654 0 27= ». .
23
Look for:• Blank rows – unaddressed customer need• Blank columns – unimportant engineering
requirement• Communication opportunities• Sales Points – competitors strengths/features• Resolve or prioritize negative correlations• Final correct targets• Determining planned quality• What design requirements to be deployed to
Phase II (Parts Deployment)
Analyzing and Diagnosing the HOQ
24
Summary – QFD/HOQCustomer requirements• Rank based on customer priority
Engineering requirements• Must be measureable (e.g., engineering units), have
improvement direction and a target value• Rate relationship to customer requirements• Relate tradeoffs with other engineering reqs.• Determine most important ones using calculation
Describing this figure in text• Describe chart’s contents, not what the chart is itself!• What is important for each set of data?• Use numerical information from figure
See Ch. 2 in book for detail, templates online