24
QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

QUALITY BREAK5 into 1 will go

A study in regulatory convergence

26 April 2007

Page 2: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Ofcom

The Office of Communications

A case study on public sector mergers and regulatory structures

Page 3: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Setting up Ofcom

The legacy bodies Chronology Implementation Key conclusions Questions and discussion

Page 4: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

The legacy bodies

Oftel - telecoms Radiocommunications Agency – spectrum ITC – commercial television Radio Authority – commercial/independent

radio BSC – standards and fairness

Page 5: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Chronology

1995 Demos – “Communicating Britain’s Future”2000 EC Communications Directives (July 2003)December 2000 White Paper - “A New Future for

Communications”March 2002 – Ofcom Act, Royal AssentMay 2002 – Draft Communications Act and pre-

legislative scrutinyJuly 2003 – Communications Act, Royal Assent29 December 2003 – vesting date for Ofcom

Page 6: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Ofcom

Office of Communications Citizens and/or consumers Economic and competition regulator Content regulator Delivering the UK’s digital future in communications Stimulate dynamic markets:

– Telecommunications– Radio spectrum– Television– Radio

Page 7: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Implementation

Politics and legislation Finance Structure and scope Transition project Senior recruitment and culture Governance Staffing Systems and Operations Property Public face

Page 8: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Politics and legislation

Cross-departmental – ministerial commitment – core team of officials

Two-stage legislative process – with a forcing function

Firm decisions on legacy issues Early decision on governance model HR issues to inform legislative process Establish principles of parliamentary accountability

Page 9: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Finance - 1

Different legacy finance regimes Departments’ input via HMT Early commitment from Government to finance the

new body – working capital – financial memorandum Early financial arrangements:

– wide range of skills in the early finance team– appoint interim FD– financial modelling including cost allocations– identify financial skills in advance of recruitment

Provision for extensive dual running

Page 10: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Finance - 2

Change management/due diligence standards below private sector norm – professional advice

Establish independence via audit committee Understand crucial IS role for payroll and other HR Establish early links with NAO Control/scrutiny of legacy bodies

– changes in assets and liabilities– commitments– expenditure

Set clear budget targets from early in the project

Page 11: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Structure and scope

New structure sends a key signal – design without obligations to legacy bodies – opportunity for radical review

Minimise potential for turf wars Plan Nations and Regions strategy with vigour –

avoid ‘branch office’ syndrome Role of regulator in policy-making Ofcom model – exec/non-exec Annual plan process

Page 12: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Transition project - 1

Those running the new body need a big say in how the transition is managed

Impact on legacy bodies– timescale– cooperation– work in progress – risk for key personnel in legacy bodies

Heavy-hitting central project team – Professional project management– expertise in finance, HR, IT, property – locate away from legacy bodies

Page 13: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Transition project - 2

External consultants– Independence and expertise– Scoping project– Process owned clearly at a senior level– Over-arching consultancy less relevant for implementation

and delivery, and very expensive Launch plan – to drive the process Communication – clear – crucial Arrangements for continuing projects and regulatory

activity – taking on tasks before vesting

Page 14: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Senior recruitment and culture

CEO appointment sets the tone High quality staff from outside public sector

– pay implications– setting the style– matching/exceeding industry capacities– High expectations of quality and volume of work

Coherence in central Board Role of non-executive members Internal systems to be proportionate to size

Page 15: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Governance

Agree formal memorandum with legacy bodies Firmly locate where responsibility lies at each stage,

esp. financial Make timely, holistic decisions on governance

structure Agree governance issues early with new Board –

then put interim structures in place Appoint subsidiary Boards after Main Board and

executives Establish a formal diversity policy from earliest stage

Page 16: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Staffing - 1

Statutory considerations over transfers condition all subsequent work – avoid irreversible commitments

Implement early HR capacity – appoint HR director – good advisors

Legacy bodies’ HR teams are in a difficult position– may have different aims– provision of information– unwelcome commitments– avoid late changes affecting transfers– need for careful due diligence

Page 17: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Staffing - 2

Ensure early design of rewards package The new body to manage communication to

staffs Begin dialogue early with Cabinet Office for

civil service pensions Union recognition/arrangements/staff

representations will be time-consuming

Page 18: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Systems and Operations

IS considerations are another early priority Specialist consultancy/support is necessary, but

must be challenged and held accountable Seek to accelerate systems implementation – take

items off the critical path Seek common services solutions – commitments by

legacy bodies Provide for vigorous, skilled negotiation IS = business processes, not only technology

Page 19: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Property

There is symbolic importance in location decisions – making a statement about a new start

Avoid over-indulgence in selecting property – extensive research and cost analysis

One-stop-shop project management is effective and cost-efficient

Give early attention to disability issues and access Locate transition team into the new property Involve transferring staff in design and planning

Page 20: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Public face

Media attention will be intense long before actual existence – resource accordingly – Chair/Board at risk

Communications function needs to be up and running early, with agreed key messages and mission statements

Stakeholder consultation– as wide as possible– but a heavy workload, needing professional skills

New body to speak directly to legacy staffs, not the legacy bodies

Establish internal communications function, owned by new body rather than external consultants

Page 21: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Key conclusions - 1

Joined up legislative, departmental process essential Early decision crucial on what type of regulator Key management decisions will inevitably taken at a

very early stage Agreeing the ‘deal’ for recruitment is the pre-requisite

for populating the new body, requiring early appointment of HR director

Pensions are a complex and potential blocking issue Financial arrangements and good management need

to be in place from the start

Page 22: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Key conclusions - 2

Recruitment and reward for senior team was central to Ofcom’s style and effectiveness

Is policy making the proper role of a regulator? External consultancy and research are expensive

and difficult to control, but arguably essential at the early stage

Need to manage a wide range of sectors with potentially conflicting needs and issues

Public sector mergers need a ‘take-over code’ Communication, communication, communication…

Page 23: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Questions and discussion

Page 24: QUALITY BREAK 5 into 1 will go A study in regulatory convergence 26 April 2007

Tony Stoller

26 April 2007

Porters House Consulting023 8063 [email protected]