20
Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University

Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

Quackery,pseudoscience,andcorruption:CAMinthemedia

DrMoniqueLewisGriffithUniversity

Page 2: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends
Page 3: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends
Page 4: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

Ø Factivasearch:“FriendsofScienceinMedicine”Ø 2011-2017Ø MajormetropolitanornationalnewsoutletsØ FSMwebsiteandmediaarchivesØ 144articlesfoundØ  Inclusioncriteria:mainstreamnewsreports,

featuresstories,editorialsthatreferredtoFSMorfeaturedFSMactor

Ø 76articleswereanalysedØ  Intercoderreliability

Searches

Page 5: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

Ø Codebook–67codesØ 4Maincodes

Ø HeadlineintonationØ ArticleintonationØ FramingØ Sources

Coding

Page 6: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

•  MypreviousresearchofherbalmedicinemediarepresentationsinAustraliannewspapers(Lewis,2011a;Lewis,2011b)

•  FindingsfromotherresearchthatanalysedtheFSMdebateinAustralia(Brosnan,2015;Flatt,2013);

•  Framesthatwereaddedafterinitialscrutinyofthedata;

•  Newframesthatemergedduringthecodingprocess.

Framing codes were based on …

Page 7: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

Results for headline and article tone

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Negative Positive Neutral CAMNegative CAMPositive CAMNeutral CAMMixed

Num

bero

sarticles

HeadlineIntonationofnewsarticle

Page 8: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35Num

bero

farticles

Framesinnewsreports

Page 9: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

•  Lucrativeindustry/profession(42%,n=32)•  CAMasillegitimate(32%,n=24)

Most frequent frames

Page 10: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

•  EvidenceforCAMispoor(21%,n=16)•  CAMispopularandrelevant(20%,n=15)•  Primacyofbiomedicalknowledge(20%,n=15)

•  RiskofCAMproductsorservices(18%,n=14)

•  RegulationofCAMprofessions(14%,n=11)

Other frequent frames

Page 11: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45Num

bero

farticles

Primarysourcesinnewsreports

Page 12: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

•  ‘highprofilescientists’(Medew2012,TheAge)

•  ‘leadingscientistsandmedicalresearchers’(Arndt2012,TheAustralian)

•  ‘themostseniorscientists’(Colvin2012,ABCRadio)

•  ‘Australia'smostprominentdoctors,medicalresearchersandscientists’(Houghton2012,TheCourierMail).

Building ethos with the voices of ‘biomedical insiders’ (Hallin et al., 2013)

Page 13: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

•  ‘BigWellness,likeBigTobacco,isbigbusiness’(HeraldSun,2017),

•  ‘Theendresultisamarketfloodedwithshonkyproducts,makingitverydifficultforconsumers,andhealthprofessionals,topickthesmallamountofevidence-basedwheatfromthevoluminous,hypedrivenchaff’(TheAge,2013).

•  ‘Therewouldbepressureonthe[university]researchers(with)$15millionatstake.Wewouldn'treallywanttoproducenegativeresults.’(ABCNews,2014).

CAM as lucrative and unethical

Page 14: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

•  ‘Taxpayers’moneyshouldnotbewastedonfunding[thesecourses]...norshouldgovernmenthealthinsurancerebatesbewastedonthisnonsense’.(Burke2012)

•  ‘Pseudoscientificcoursessullythegenuinelyscientificcoursesandresearchconductedatthesameinstitution’,sayAlastairMacLennanandRobertMorrison,whoco-wrotetheeditorialintheMedicalJournalofAustralia.(AAP2012)

•  Muchofmodernchiropractic,unfortunately,hasdescendedintotherealmofquackery.(Demasi2013,Catalyst)

CAM as illegitimate

Page 15: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

•  Journaliststrusttheirexpertise•  Strategiccommunicationtactics•  AbsenceofvoicesfromCAMscienceresearch

•  JournalistsfavourFSMframingsofCAM•  Appealofaudienceadvocacystories•  Newsculture•  Newsvalues•  Effectivemediarelationspractice

Why they are winning with framing …

Page 16: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

Accessvia:https://ssrn.com/author=3350645

Page 17: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends
Page 18: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

•  Truthfulness•  Authenticity•  Respect•  Equality•  Socialresponsibility

Ethical communciation 101: TARES

Page 19: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

THANKYOU

DrMoniqueLewisGriffithUniversity

Page 20: Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media · Quackery, pseudoscience, and corruption: CAM in the media Dr Monique Lewis Griffith University Ø Factiva search: “Friends

DrMoniqueLewisSchoolofHumanities,LanguagesandSocialScienceGriffithUniversityQueenslandEmail:[email protected]:@DrMoniqueLewisPublications:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Monique_Lewis3https://ssrn.com/author=3350645