Upload
melissa-park
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
QED at Finite Temperature and Constant Magnetic Field:
The Standard Model of Electroweak Interaction at Finite Temperature and Strong Magnetic Field
Neda SadooghiNeda SadooghiDepartment of Physics
Sharif University of TechnologyTehran-Iran
Prepared for CEP seminar, Tehran, May 2008
Summary of the 1st Lecture:
The problem of baryogenesis:
Why is the density of baryons much less than the density of photons? 9 orders of magnitude difference between observation and
theory
Why in the observable part of the universe, the density of baryons is many orders greater than the density of antibaryons? The density of baryons is 4 orders of magnitude greater than
the density of antibaryons
3 Sakharov conditions for baryogenesis:
Violation of C and CP symmetries Deviation from thermal equilibrium Non-conservation of baryonic charge
A number of models describe baryogenesis:
Electroweak baryogenesis Affleck-Dine scenario of baryogenesis in SUSY …. Electroweak baryogenesis in a constant magnetic field
Electroweak (EW) baryogenesis
In EWSM there are processes that violate C and CP
EW phase transition Out of equilibrium process 2nd order phase transition at Tc=225 GeV
One loop approx
1st order phase transition at Tc=140.42 GeV
One loop + ring contributions
Baryon number non-conservation is related to sphaleron
decay
Although the minimal EWSM has all the necessary
ingredients for successful baryogenesis neither the amount of CP violation whithin the minimal SM,
nor the strength of the EW phase transition
is enough to generate sizable baryon number
Other methods …
Electroweak baryogenesis in a constant magnetic field
The Relation between Baryogenesis and Magnetogenesis
The sphaleron decay changes the baryon number and produces helical magnetic field
The helicity of the magnetic field is related to the number of baryons
produced by the sphaleron decay (Cornwall 1997, Vachaspati 2001)
A small seed field is generated by the EW phase transition
It is then amplified by turbulent fluid motion ( )
Observation: Background large scale cosmic magnetic field
G2910~
G610~
Strong Magnetic Field; Experiment
Magnetic fields in the compact stars: Experiment:
In the Little Bang (heavy ion collisions at RHIC) 0711.0950 [hep-ph] L.D. McLerran et al.
A new effect of charge separation (P and CP violation) in the
presence of background magnetic field Chiral magnetic effect
The estimated magnetic field in the center of Au+Au collisions
GB 178 1010~
GB 1716 1010~
EW Baryogenesis in Strong Hypermagnetic Field
Series of papers by:Series of papers by: Skalozub & Bordag (1998-2006), Ayala et al. (2004-2008)
Electroweak phase transition in a strong magnetic field Effective potential in one-loop + ring contributions Higgs mass
Result:Result: The phase transition is of 1st order for magnetic field
The baryogenesis condition is not satisfied !!!
Improved ring potential of QED at finite temperature and in the presence of weak/strong magnetic field
The Critical T of Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in the LLL
0805.0078 [hep-ph]
N. S. & K. Sohrabi
Outline:Part 1: QED at B = 0 and finite T
Ring diagrams in QED at B = 0 and finite T
Part 2: QED in a strong B field at T=0 Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking (DSB)
Part 3: QED at finite B and T Results from 0805.0078 [hep-ph]; N.S. and K. Sohrabi
QED effective (thermodynamic) potential in the IR limit
QED effective potential in the limit of weak/strong magnetic field
Dynamical symmetry breaking in the lowest Landau Level (LLL)
Numerical analysis of Tc
Part 1: QED at B = 0 and finite T
Ring
Diagrams
Ring (Plasmon) Potential
Partition Function at finite Temperature
Bosonic partition function
Partition function of interacting fields:
Perturbative Series:
In the theory the free propagator is given by
Bosonic Matsubara frequencies
In higher orders of perturbation Full photon propagator
is the self energy
QED free photon propagator
Photon self energy
General form of photon self energy at zero B and non-zero T
with the projection operators are determined by Ward identity
G and F include perturbative corrections and are given by a
(analytic) series in the coupling constant e
QED Ring Diagrams at zero B and non-zero T
Using the free propagator and the photon self energy
QED Ring potential
QED ring potential in the static limit New unexpected contribution from perturbation theory
Effects of Ring Potential
In the MSM EW phase transition
Changing the type of phase transition
Decreasing the critical T
EWSM in the Presence of B Field (Skalozub + Bordag)
Ring contribution in the static limit
Our idea:Our idea: Calculate ring diagram in the improved IR limit
Look for e.g. dynamical chiral SB in the LLL
Question: What is the effect of the new approximation in changing
(decreasing) the critical temperature of phase transition?
Part 2: QED in a Strong Magnetic Field at T=0
QED in a strong B field at T=0
QED Lagrangian density
with
we choose a symmetric gauge with
Using Schwinger proper time formalism Full fermion and
photon propagators
Fermion propagator in a constant magnetic field
n labels the Landau levels are some Laguerre polynomials
In the IR region, with physics is dominated by the dynamics in the Lowest Landau Level LLL (n=0)
An effective quantum field theory (QFT) replaces the full QFT
Properties of effective QED in the LLL (I)
A) Dimensional reduction Fermion propagator Dimensional Reduction
Photon acquires a finite mass
Properties of effective QED in the LLL (II)
B) Dynamical mass generation
Dynamical chiral symmetry breaking
Start with a chirally invariant theory in nonzero B The chiral symmetry is broken in the LLL and
A finite fermion mass is generated
Part 3: QED at Finite B and T
QED Effective Potential at nonzero T and B
QED Effective (Thermodynamic) Potential
at Finite T and in a Background Magnetic
Field
Approximation beyond the static limit k 0
Full QED effective potential consists of two parts The one-loop effective potential
The ring potential
QED One-Loop Effective Potential at Finite T and B
T independent part
T dependent part
QED Ring Potential at Finite T and B
QED ring potential
Using a certain basis vectors defined by the eigenvalue
equation of the VPT (Shabad et al. ‘79)
The free photon propagator in the Euclidean space
)(ib
VPT at finite T and in a constant B field ( Shabad et al. ‘79)
Orthonormality properties of eigenvectors Ring potential
Ring potential in the IR limit (n=0)
)(ib
The integrals
IR vs. Static Limit
Ring potential in the IR limit
In the static limit k 0
QED Ring Potential in Weak Magnetic Field Limit
QED Ring Potential in Weak B Field Limit and Nonzero T Conditions: and
Evaluating in eB 0 limit
In the IR limit
In the static limit k 0
QED ring potential in the IR limit and weak magnetic field
In the high temperature expansion
In the limit
Comparing to the static limit, an additional term appears Well-known terms in QCD at finite T Hard Thermal Loop Expansion
Braaten+Pisarski (’90)
2/5
QED Ring Potential in Strong Magnetic Field Limit
Remember: QED in a Strong B Field at zero T; Properties Dynamical mass generation
Dynamical chiral symmetry breaking
Bound state formation
Dimensional reduction from D D-2 Two regimes of dynamical mass
Photon is massive in the 2nd regime:
QED Ring Potential in Strong B Field limit at nonzero T Conditions:
Evaluating in limit
with
QED ring potential in the IR limit and strong magnetic field
In the high temperature limit
Comparing to the static limit
From QCD at finite T and n=0 limit (Toimela ’83)
Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking in the LLL
QED in a Strong Magnetic Field at zero T; Properties
Dynamical mass generation
Dynamical chiral symmetry breaking
Bound state formation
Dimensional reduction from D D-2
QED Gap Equation in the LLL
QED in the LLL Dynamical mass generation The corresponding gap equation
Using
Gap equation where
One-loop contribution Ring contribution
One-loop Contribution
Dynamical mass
Critical temperature Tc is determined by
Ring Contribution
Using and
Dynamical mass
Critical temperature of Dynamical Symmetry Breaking (DSB)
Critical Temperature of DSB in the IR Limit Using
The critical temperature Tc in the IR limit
where is a fixed, T independent mass (IR cutoff)
and
Critical Temperature of DSB in the Static Limit
Using
The critical temperature Tc in the static limit
IR vs. Static Limit
Question: How efficient is the ring contribution in the IR or static
limits in decreasing the Tc of DSB arising from one-loop EP?
The general structure of Tc
To compare Tc in the IR and static limits, define
IR limit
Static limit
Define the efficiency factor
where
and the Lambert W(z) function, staisfying
It is known that
Numerical Results
Choosing , and
Astrophysics of neutron stars RHIC experiment (heavy ion collisions)