Q - éo&/-/ /477* · PDF file · 2016-01-12FM UD; MISREPM SENTATION AND ... ACTION FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT Here comes Plaintiff George R. Simpson, Prose,

Q - éo&/-/ /477*/

UNITED STATES DISTRIC'F COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GEORGE R. SIMPSON

VS.

JAM ES RANDI , D. J. GROTH aE PRESIDENT OF

JAMRANDAL JAM ES HAMILTON ZW INGE,

AlG JES RANDI EDUCATIONAL

FOUN DATION, JAM ES RANDI

EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

FM UD; M ISREPM SENTATION AND

BREACH OF CONTRACT;IN TEN TIONAL INFLICTION OF

EM OTIONAL DISTRESS;

M ISFEASANCE; M ALFEASANCE;

CONSPIM CY (SECT 1985 AND 1986);ACTIQN FOR DAMAGES; ANDACTION FOR SPECIFIC

PERFORM ANCE

PLAINTIFF'S AM ENDED COM PLAINT

Here comes Plaintiff George R. Sim pson, Prose, and files this Am ended

Complaint against Randal James Hamilton Zwinge (aka James Randi), D. J. Grothe,

President of the James Randi Educational Foundation, and James Randi Educational

Foundation IJllEFI, alleging the following: This Amended Complaint replaces the

Complaint filed on M ay 2, 2012.

Jurisdiction

1. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. jj 1331, and 28

U.S.C. jj 1332.

2. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. j1391.

3. Plaintiff George R. Simpson resides in Southampton, New York, and has an

address at PO Box 775, Hampton Bays, New York 1 1946.

4. Defendants 1) Randal James Hamilton Zwinge (aka James Randi) 2) D.J.

Grothe, President of the James Randi Educational Foundation and 3) the Jnmes

Randi Educational Foundation (JREF), according to the website operated by

them, have an address of 201 S.E. 12th Street, Ft Lauderdale, FL 333 16.

5. On infonnation and bèlief, Defendant James Randi Educational Foundation

(JREF) is an organization without limited liability protection for its owner and

Case 0:12-cv-60817-KMW Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2012 Page 1 of 29

# à

7.

8.

9.

1 1 .

t

operator, Defendant Randal James Hamilton Zwinge? and Defendant D

.J.Grothe, President of the James Randi Ed

ucational Foundation.Plaintiff George R

. Simpson is an engineer, inventor, writer, and businessman

.Today, he makes his living, primarily, from progrnmming and dat

a publishingbusinesses in the Real Estate field on th

e East End of Long lsland (thelbmptons).

Plaintiff George R. Simpson also owns and operates real estate related

businesses, ''Office Vanagement Systems

, Corp. - wwm hamptonslistings.com ,

www.eastendlistinas.com, and Suffolk Research Service

, lnc. --www.suffolkresearch.com , w w w .eastendcomps.com .

Plaintiff Simpson is a recognized expert on the Hamptons real estate industry

and he is frequently quoted in the eight local East End Long lsland newspapers

,and in other publications such as The W all St

reet Journal, The New YorkTimes, The New York Post

, Newsday, and Bloomburg.

Plaintiff Simpson also owns and operates two websites, wwwtufoetblog.com

and www.etcom gods.com, created to explain and promote the ISET C

ol'n Godslanguage and game''.

Defendants 1) Randal James Hamilton Zwinge (aka James Randi) and 2) the

James Randi Educational Foundation IJREFI, have a website: www .randiaorg.

The www.rmxdi.org website describes the JREF pumose as follow s:

1. Keep up the fight against superstition in the world today2

. Promote critical thinking about the supematural and paranormal3

. Provide scholarships to students who show promise in spreading

critical thinking in their chosen fields4. Challenge those who would deceive the

public for profit orpolitical gainOrganize international meetings that brin

g the critical thinkingcommunity together

6. Maintain vigilanee over media organizations that will sacrifice

the truth for higher ratings

j

l

lh


www.randi.org describes the Defendant Jam es Randi Educational Foundation

aS:

''An Educational Resource on the Paranorm al,

Pseudoscientific, and Supernatural''.

13. Defendants James Randi, D. J. Grothe, and Jnmes Randi Educational

Foundation (JREF) present a picture of legitimate and professionally run

activities, where Paranormal, Pseudoscientifsc, and Supernatural topics are

studied in a responsible manner.

Defendant JREF maintains a tçcontest'' called il-l-he One M illion Dollar

Challenge'', whieh the website www.randi.org explains as follows:

''The JREF willpay US$l, 000, 000 (One Million USDollars) (''The Prize ') to anyperson who demonstratesanypsychic, supernatural, orparanormal ability under

satisfactory observation. Such demonstration must takeplace under the rules and limitations described in this

docu'ment. An qpplicant can befrom or in anypart oftheworld Gender, race, and educational background are not

factorsfor acceptance. Applicants must be at least 18years ofage and legally able to enter into bindinga reements. ''g

1 5. George R. Simpson, Plaintiff in the instant lawsuit, applied for the içone Million

Dollar Challenge'', fulflling the requirements for applicants contained on the

website (appended in Exhibit 1, letter dated August 18, 201 l).

16. Seven weeks later (letter dated October 3, 201 1) Plaihtiff was informed that

Plaintiff s Challenge application was missing items.

17. By letter dated November 30, 201 1, Plaintiff Simpson supplied missing

introduction letters from two professors, ther' eby completing the application.

18. The following link shows Plaintiffs application for the challenge:

http://ufoetblog.com /'?p=44l 0.


@il

1

19. The application is also copied in Exhibit 1 of this Complaint: Letter from

Plaintiff George R . Simpson dated August 18, 201 1 to James Randi Educational

Foundation, enclosing the ltApplication''.

Facts

20. Plaintiff George R. Simpson, for 27 years

, has been performing the scientific

investigation and discovery of a hidden language, embedded in the English

language.

Plaintiff Geprge R. Simpson has documented thousands of examples of words

which contain hidden 'meanings. The existence of these hidden meanings is

proof, contrary to common belief, that the English language did not ûtevolve''

Language, rather, was planned (designed) so that these hidden meanings could

be revealed by using the decoding nlles discovered by Plaintiff

Subliminal communication with the paranormal presence confirmed Plaintiff s

course of study and discovery. In addition, his hundreds of thousands of trial

and error translations gave feedback as to the correctness and suitability of the

translation methods and decoding rules.

23. The existence of thousands of word decodings is proof of the btparanormal''.

24. The hidden language and decoding structurq to uncover hidden meanings was

named the ::ET Corn Gods language and game''.

25. One objective of Plaintiff s ET Col'n Gods language/game discovery and

documentatipn (for many years) has been to apply for, and to win the JREF The

One Million Dollar Càallenge.

The following link shows Plaintiff s application for the challenge:

http://ut-oetbloc.eom/?p=44lo.

27. The application is also copied in Exhibit 1 of this Complaint: Letter from

Plaintiff George R . Simpson dated August 18, 201 1 to James Randi Educational

Foundation, enclosing the çlApplication''.talso included in Exhibit 1)

28. In his applieation, Plaintiff Simpson proposed as a tejt protocol (to test whether

the claims are étparanormal''), the following:

li1

4


k

é'Ipropose a d#erent set ofdecoding criteria, e.g. someother base number other than 66,. a dterent list ofBiblebooks, bookpositions and book abbreviations

..

dp rentchart ofelemehts. ''

Exhibits IV and V provide snmples of randomly selected Bible Books and

Elements that could be used in the Challenge.

Seven we'eks later, Plaintiff received a letter, dated October 3, 201 1 from

President of JREF, Defendant D.J. Grothe. His letter said that applicant

Simpson had omitted one requirement of the Application, that om ission is

covered in the following statement options to submit from the www.randi.org

website:

a. ad signed letter ofreferenceh'om a medical doctor, afaculty memberat an accredited university or college, or a professional researchscientist (i.e., employed by an industry or government agency)stating that the person should be considered a serious Applicant andthat the claim merits testing.

ad copy ofqny article, book television appearance (other than thosepublished solely on the Interneo, or other recognized independentmedia in which the Applicant and the relevant claim arefeaturedSelf-promotional or self-published accounts do not qual#.

c.. W video (made available electronically or delivered onphysicalmedia) in which the Applicant clearly demonstrates the claimedability Self-produced videos are permitted Such video becomes theproperty ofthe JREF and the Applicant grants the JREF anirrevocable license to publish or otherwise use the video in any wtz

-p.

Submitting a video is the lowest standard ofthese three options, andApplicants who choose to provide a video instead ofa letter ofrejèrence or media sample are not automatically cxonsideredfor aPreliminary Test and are not entitled to a written explanation oftheir rejection. The selection ofvideo Applicantsfor PreliminaryTests may be done by any method, at the JREF'S sole discretion.

Plaintiff applicant Simpson fulfilled the missing application requirement by

supplying ûçsigned letters of introduction'' from two separate professors from

accredited universities. (Letter dated November 30, 201 1)


4*

Months passed with Plaintiff Simpson waiting for Defendant JREF to respond.

33. Then, Plaintiff got an email from Defendant JREF (months after the corrected

application was mailed to JREF). The email said that JREF needed two or three

weeks more to evaluate Plaintiff s applieation.

34. M onths passed, again, with no answer from Defendant JREF. Plaintiff had been

romised a response in tûtwo or tllree weeks''.p

35. Plaintiff Simpson made numerous emails and phone calls (a1l the JREF phone

lines are answered by machine) to Defendant JREF. None were answered.

Plaintiff also inquired to people named on www.randi.org, known to be working

with Defendants Jnmes Randi and JREF, asking: ûéW hy don't they return phone

calls? W hy don't they return emails? Is Randi afraid of my winning his

$1Mil1ion?''

37. Someone set up a discussion thread at www .randi.org concerning the George R .

Simpson (titled çreorge Russel Simpson'') application, which was not being

followed up by Defendant JREF. The thread stayed on the internet for three

days, was made inactive, and then several weeks later, it was taken off the

Internet. The thread was started on M arch 3, 2012, 09:42 AM by poster

dtpaulmark''. The last post appeared on M arch 6, 2012, 1 1 :14 PM by poster

llwardenclyffe''. JREF advertises that it is the place for free and open discussion

of the ûtparanormal'' and tlskeptical'' except when it comes to discussing One

Villion Dollar Challenger, George R. Simpson.

38. Plaintiff was able to get two of the Randi.org associates to commtmicate with

him. One of the JREF'S içsenior Fellows'' said that Randi.org was not

answering Plaintiffs phone calls and emails, because Plaintiff Simpson had

previously sued Jam es Randi and JREF. Plaintiff Simpson's response was:

''Ifyour SlMillion Challenge is not being offered to thosewht? hadpreviouslyhled suits against James Randi/lRkythen your SMillion written tpf/'cr should say so ''.


39. Plaintiff Simpson was also able to start a içFacebook'' dialog with Tyler

Measom, one of the two filmmakers of a documentary about James Randi called

itAn Honest Liar''. Mr. M easom told Plaintiff Simpson that Defendant James

Randi didn't have time to get back to a1l those who applied for the SlM illion

Challenge, because he gets 100 applications a month. That statem ent is not

trtle.

40. Finally, on April 03, 2012, Plaintiff received the appended email (Exhibit 1I)

from ûtBanachek JREF <[email protected]'. The email asked four

questions of Simpson about his Challenge. The email (and the JREF questions)

was answered by Plaintiff Simpson's Exhibit II1 email, requesting that

Defendant JREFget back to him within a wcck

Defendants did not respond within the requested one week time period.

Defendants, at the tslihg of the instant Complaint, have not responded at all.

42. Defendants have therefore violated a contractual relationship with Plaintiff

George R. Simpson.

43. There was an offer made by Defendant JREF on the website Randi.org The

same or slightly changed SlM illion Challenge offer had been accepted,

according to Defendant James Randi, ûçover one hundred times'' with other

people who wished to have their tdparanormal claims'' tested.

44. The Exhibit 1 challenge acceptance and subsequent correspondence from

Defendants to Plaintiff is evidence of the three elements of a contract: The 1)

offer, 2) acceptance and 3) contract compensation.

45. But when Plaintiff George R. Simpson filed an application for the $ lM illion

Challenge, he was treated in a fraudulent way. Defendants did not return calls

or emails.

46. When Defendant JRE/ finally answered by email on April 03, 2012, the answer

evidenced total lack of understanding of Plaintiffs proposed Stprotocol''.

47. Note: çiprotocol'' is the word used in the JREF SlM illion Challenge to define

the testing scheme for each Challenge.

7


48. Defendants claim to be the defender of scientific and critical thinking methods,

yet they exhibited the scientifc/math sophistication of a grade school student.

49. Because of the stonewalling and inactivity of Defendants, Plaintiff has been

fprced to sue to compel Defendants to perform as they have promised in their

advertised Gûone Million Dollar Challenge''.

50. Defendants have treatçd Plaintiff in a fraudulent manner and have

misrepresented their offer.

51 . Because Defendants know that Plaintiff Simpson will win the $ lMillion

Challenge, Defendants are stonewalling, trying to avoid the contest.

W hv is The ET Corn Gods Lanzuaze and Game

Evidence of the Gparanorm ar.

52. W e are taught that Language evolved. For language to be organized in a pattern

which cannot be explained by evolution would be evidence of. divine

intervention or the tlparanorm al'' W e are taught that words were created by

circumstances over a long period of years. As words were coined in use, they

became a part of the English Language. Al1 words, including recently coined

words such as Stcar'' tftoaster'' tçcomputer'' are thought to evolve, one word at a5 5

tim e.

53. But, in fact, the ET Corn Gods language/game discovery is evidence that GOD

preplnnned the English Language so that words and groups of words were

linked together within words giving meaning to the words, using the rules

contained on the website www.etcorngods.com

The websites www.ufoetblog and www.etcorngods.com provide thousands of

exnmples of the hidden pre-plalmed linked language within words.

55. For instance, the word çtcom puter'' decodes to the key components of a

ikc tejz, lOm Pu .

1 C ter'ompu .

C is c+66+66 = tlm e''


Drop oTherefore'.

Com = ûlM em''

Add 0+66+66 ...' = 1:Or''.

R is 18, 180, 180 = 1 eighty. (Sdd ç10'')Therefore'.

Com = içM em ory''

Therefore'.

Computer = ûtM em ory puter''

Pu is up, backwards. .

1.1-66-66 .. = 4, book backwards is 40, book Mt, mt-66-66 . .. = ççHar''.R is 18, 14+4, 14+44. (add 40, 40 is book Mt, 1m-66-66 ... = (û0'')Therefore'. '

Computer = tûM emory Hardd d ter''.

D is 500. 5+33, 38, 108, 18, IûR'' (drop 110'5)Add 0+66+66 .... = çtor'' backwards is tçro'' book 45, lûive''5 ' *

Therefore'.

Computer = t'M em ory Hard Drive Ter''.

Ter:

T is 20 book 1Tr''7 *

E1+66+66 . ... = ç$In''

Add 0+66+66 ... = 1$Sn'' Sç-l-in'' 111-66-66 . .. = tder''5 5 *

Therefore;

Computer = çlM emory Hard Drive Printer''.Add o, 15, 13+2, tçMb''5

Add o,

Add 0+66+66 .. = ltther''.B is Boron,

Ron = rn, rad. (drop t$o'')Ra is 1 8 1 , backwards is 18 1, ûçAr''.Therefore:

Boron = ûlBoard''

Computer = ûtM emory Hard Drive Printer M other Board''Add 0+66+66 . .. = 1ESn'' :l-l-in''5 ,

T'.

T is 20, book Pr. .

P is l6, 6 is vi, 229, 2+29 = 1$Ca''.Therefore:

PF = VVM RI'''

Ar is a1--66-66 . .. = td52'' book ûlAth''5 *

UIT == Vilsl Ettll''


Computer = HM emory H ard Drive Priùter M other

Board M ath Internet Program ''

56. Note the logic to create the incredible string.of words common to a computer

use the number 66, Roman Numbers, the elements Sn (Tin), Boron, and the

àooks of the Bible, 1çPr''.

57. Here are som e exnmples of simple translations.

58. Take the word çtDiscovery''. (The word suggests some triscovery'').

Discovery:

D is letter 4. (a,b,c,d)C is Roman Num eral 100.

In :Add 0+66+66 .. = 1$Sn'' ût-l-in'' 1n-66-66 = 'çer''5 9 *

Add 0+66+66 .. = tiNet''

Therefore;

ln = ûllnternet''Therefore'. .

Computer = lûMemory Hard Drive Printer M other Board M ath Internet''Add 0+66+66 . = û1Sn'' Sû-l-in'' 1n-66-66 = û'er''5 5 *

T is Pr, Pro. (add 105)R is l8, 18+40 = 58, 58+66+66 ... = 1ûGr''.

Therefore'.

Ter = Etprogr r''

R is r+66+66 .. = 1:Al'' L+66+66 = ûtnd'' n+d = R 1+66+66 .. = ç1Al''5 5 5 *

Therefore:

Ter = ûlprograal''

AL backwards is La, 121, backards is 121, La.La = l+a $ûM '', *

Ter = ttprogrnm''

Computer = itMemory Hard Drive Printer M other Board Math lnternet Program''.

Add 0+66+66 .. = t1Net''.

N is ad, Add. (D is 3, add 40, book Mt, Mt-66-66 ... = tû0'')Add 0+66, book Rev. v is 22, book tCSS''.

Et+66+66 .. . = ûtip''Therefore:

Computer = 'çM emory Hard Drive Printer Mother Board M ath lnternçt Program

Address IP''

10


Y is letter 25.

Therefore:

Discovery = $ç4 is 100 over 25''. (D is C over Y)

59. Take the word liFormula''. , The word says: CûF or MULA''. The word

tiFormula'' has two im portant translations.

Formula: (meaning 1)IIM '' is letter 13.

u1a = A1. (letter IIU'' turns adjacent letterts) bqckwards e.g.: U La = Al)Therefore:

Form ula = fiFor 13, AL''.Note: 13 is the atom ic number of ûtA1''.

Formula: (meaning 2)U and L cancel.

(Letter 21 and letter 12 cancel each other in accordance with therules)

Therefore:

Form ula = diF or M A''@

Note: F = M a is a most famous physics formula.

60. W hen Plaintiff Simpson was given the assignment of deciphering the English

Language to find the keys to the lll-lidden Language'', it took two or three years

of trial and error to get the tsrst clues of the decoding rules. Then it took over

25 years to develop a working knowledge - all trial and error.

61. lt was like being brought into a cave where there were strange writings in an

unknown language on the wall of the cave. The job is to decipher the language,

find the keys, which convert the cave wall Fritings to English.

62. An analogous situation was the discovery of the EtRosetta Stone''. W hen the

stone was found, there were years of trial and error cycles to discover/decipher

what was N itten on the stone. It fnally turned out that there was the same

message repeated thre'e times, each of the three is a different language.

63. lt took a long time of trial and enor to decipher the three languages, as it took

years to decipher the ET Colm Gods language/gam e translations.


W hy does the ET Corn Gods Ianguage/game work?

64. Astounding as it might seem, words in the English language were pre-

programmed with hidden meanings within words, which are revealed using the

translation decoding structure of the ET Corn Gods language/game.

65. And, the language decoding very cleverly uses a combination of Bible Books

(abbreviations), Chemical Elements (Names', Atomic Numbers, and Atomic

Symbols) and the other tools/rules to discover hidden meanings. The decoding

process is not easy, but it can be taught to anyone with a high IQ.

The word lûW ord'' decodes to çtook Hard''.

67. Deaths, births, national disasters, etc. are pre-programmed into the words which

describe them, as if someone has been here (now) before. There is the

suggestion that everything is pre-plnnned - predestined by GOD .

68. ln summary, the ET Corn Gods language/game works because GOD designed it

to work, and GOD is the greatest (ultimate) engineer/programmer in the

Universe.

69. Here are a few of the hundreds of translations on wwk.ufoetblox.com which

convert to events/people/dates. (more summarized here:

http://ufoetblog.coln/?p=s6z3)

Myron L eon Wallace = 'Jew Rich, New Canaan CT(in),April 7, 2012, age 93, dea4 M ay 9, 1918 on date born, C7#5'60 Minutes Ace (A1l talk show) ''.See '' httn://ufoetblog.com/?p=s7s4

Whitney Elizabeth Houston = ''Record Star, Hit Singer,

Black Woman, 2012 AD, February 11 Die, ofœ erdose inHotel Room, Christian Faith, Home (US) New Jersey, BornOn Date August 9, 1963 AD ''

See.. http://ufoetbloa.com/?p=s46g


Trayvon Martin = (kvbhot At Close Range by Gun 2012 AD

on February 26''

See: http://ufoetblog.com/?p=s6so

Taylàr ks'wf/i = ''CMA Awards Winner, November 9, AD2011 Fr ''

See: lAttp://ut-oetblog.com/?p=soz3

70. Does the ET Corn Gods language/game work like this for all words? The

answer i: tçNo''. Plaintiff is uncertain as to whether there is no meaningful

hidden translations for some words or whether Plaintiff Simpson is simply not

able to identify the decoding routine necessary to uncover the hidden meaning.

The revelations of the ET Corn Gods language/game have W orld changing

implications. The proof of the existence of an all-controlling t.çGOD'' will

virtually end the ûûbelief ' of atheists and agnostics. Since the results of ET Corn

Gods translations are critical of organized religions like Christianity and

Judaism, those Religions will end or be greatly changed.

The ET Corn Gods language/game is an indictment against those who claim to

know/represent GOD (the Pope, Priests, Ministers, Rabbis, etc), or, in the

extreme claim , that there is no GOD, as Defendant James Randi and his

followers claim.

73. This ET Col'n Gods language/game (the basis of Plaintiff Simpson's application

for Defelidants' SlMillion Challenge) is evidence of the Paranormal.

74. This evidence will meet the challenge for the One M illion Dollars.

The ET Corn Gods Language/Gam e Reveals Translation Results Contain Jam es

Randi as a Central Them e.

75. It was discovered, after the Com plaint for the instant lawsuit was originally

filed, that the filing of the lawsuit was predestined - down to the date of the

tiling (tiled May 2, 2012 AD), by many word translations using the ET Corn

Gods language.

13


One of the purposes of GOD's ET Corn Gods language/game is to criticize

(condemn) religion. Religion at its worst, according to the translations, is

people who gather together to disbelieve that GOD exists.

Jnmes Randi makes a living out his belief that there is no GOD, that there are no

miracles, and the Paranorm al doesn't exist.

78. Some of the translations uncovered by the ET Corn Gods language about James

Randi are' tsinsulting'', and certainly not ftpolitically correcf'. GOD is very

blunt, and his hidden meanings show his disdain for itpolitical Correctness'':

Exnmples:

Disgusting = içRandi, James, Atheist Jew James Randi Gay Tiny, Joke,

GRS Gam e Corn Gods, Sexy''

lnsulting = (sGag, Atheist Jew James Randi Gay Tiny, Joke, GR S G ame

Corn Gods, Gay Jew''

Rosetta Stone = ççRandi James, ET Corn Gods 2012 AD , D are Fun Fun

Fun Fun ...''.

Note.. The Rosetta Stone (which wJx pre-coded asis the Englîsh Language), and the Pyramids,ET/UFO/Aliens, Crop Circles and the events of9l 1 2001AD, are a1I acts ofGOD, which could not have beencreated by humans. The E T Corn Gods Ianguage/gam e,

Iikewise, could not have been created by humans.

COUNT ONE

Fraud

79. Plaintiff re-alleges paragraph 1 tllrough 78, and incorporates tize same by

reference.

80. Defendants misrepresented the SlM illion Challenge. Even though Plaintiff

Simpson fulfilled his part of the first stage of the Challenge, Defendants refused

to go forward.

14


81. Defendants' fraudulent actions greatly dnmaged the Plaintiff, and prevented him

from earning the SlM illion prize.

COUNT TW O

M isrepresentation and Breach of Contract

82. Plaintiff re-alleges paragraph 1 through 8 1, and incorporates the same by

reference.

83. Defendants deliberately, fraudulently, and with malicious intent misrepresented

the slM illiolA Challenge.

84. Under the mistaken belief that Defendants' SlMillion Challenge offer would be

adhered to, Plaintiff invested many man days of work, and the Defendants'

misrepresentations caused Plaintiff to have to sue in the instant lawsuit to get

Defendants to perform under the contract.

COUNT THREE

M isfeasance

85. Plaintiff re-alleges paragraph 1 through 84, and incorporates the sam e by

reference.

86. Defendants managed the JREF Randi.org tione M illion Dollar Challenge''

business with errors and unfortunate results, greatly dam aging Plaintiff

Simpson.

87. Defendants' errors and unfortunate results damaged Plaintiff's reputation and his

financial well being, and it prevented Plaintiff from realizing the SlMillion

Challenge.

CO UNT FOUR

M alfeasance

88. Plaintiff re-alleges paragraph 1 through 87, and incom orates the sam e by

reference.


89. Defendants deliberately failed to honor their commitment to Plaintiff Simpson.

They made it impossible for Simpson to continue with the terms of the

SlMillion Challenge.

90. Defendants damaged Simpson by their Malfeasance actions.

COUNT FIVE

Action for Damazes

91. Plaintiff re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 90, and incorporates the sam e by

reference.

92. Due to the aforementioned reasons, Plaintiff has been greatly damaged,

financially and emotionally by Defendants.

93. Plaintiff seeks recovery of the dnmages by Defendants.

COUNT SIX

Action for Specific Performance


reference.

95. Plaintiffs right to compete for the SlM illion Challenge is unique and carmot be

satisfied with money alone. Therefore, Plaintiff seeks the Court's Order to

compel Defendants to complete the SlMillion Challenge specitkally as it is

promised on the Defendants' website, www.randi.org.

COUNT SEVEN

Conspiracv Section (1985 & 1986)


reference.

97. All of the named Defendants were parties to this vicious conspiracy, shown

herein by evidence of Defendants' stone-walling, delay and avoidance of

responsibility of Defendants to continue their responsibility under the Contract

with Plaintiff Simpson.


#

Relief Requested

W HEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays for the following relief:

1. An Order for Specific Performance, com pelling Defendants to perfonu the

Paranormal test prescribed by the SlM illion Challenge Offer displayed upon the

Defendant JREF website: wwm randi.org.

An Order for compensatory damages and general damages in an amount determined

by the Court to be paid to Plaintiff by Defendants.

3. An Order for punitive damages in the nmount determined by the Courq to be paid

by Defendants to Plaintiff

A1l awarded dnmages to be Jointly and Severally liable by Defendants, so that a

judgement against any Defendant can be enforced against any Defendant.

JURY TRIAL REOUESTED

DATED: June 4, 2012 GEORGE R. SIM PSON , PROSE

By:

George R. Sim pson

PO Box 775Hampton Bays, N Y 1 1946

631-357-9502


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifes that a true and exact copy of the foregoing

pleading was served by mailing the same, postage prepaid, by hand delivery or byth d f June 2012.facsimile on the 4 ay o ,

JAMES RAND ,1 D. J. GROTHEnPRESIDENT OF JAM RANDAL JAM ESHAM ILTON ZW INGEqAIQA JES RANDI EDUCATIONAL FOUN DATION,

JAMES RANDI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION

To: Hamilton Zwinge, AKA James Randi,

AndJames Randi Educational Foundation

12000 NW 8 Street

Plantation, FL 33325

Via: Mail gxxxj Fax ( 1 Hand g 1

To: J. D. Grothe,

1724 Highland Ave 525

Los Angeles, CA 90028

Via: Mail (xxx) Fax ( q Hand g )

Xtlv-


Exhibit I

The srst, absolutely for etzre, intellectual corllac/ with ET's.

see: www.Etc-o-rpGods-com

August 18, 201 1

Jam es Rahdi rduc tional Foundation

Mlllim Dcllar Challenge7965 Hollywood Boulevar :d # 666bos Angelx , CA 90028-6:35

Gentiemen

Ptea/ 5nd my *nclo:e Apjllcatlon fèf llla Milllor Dollar Chall@nge. A1K entlo:od @r: Oples dtwu al:ce e efe my wœrk * pqblished - fulfllllng lh'e rêqqiYment of yopr rulK .

l lx k fofward to Iearing frorrl you ard winnkn: the 51,0ûG,Qû0.

Sln- : youa;

0*0%e R SimpAPO Rm* 775Hampton Bap , NY 11948631-357-9502


*

I was vpsited W exedprrestnal presenc: ty/eflty-glxyeareago l he'#8 teen in contactwithU presence on 8 delly basiq ,slnceth. erl l yv'as tclt thet tlngre @a! .# hidden languageln tln. Englishlâncua; .: end thgt itwes rw jcb to decpde It and tell it to tl): wirtd.I tloe dosume v'ntêd S:tflends Qf trapslet--lon .s i'ierer w- ':étçcrngpdikcem, D t Illare:

kmw çifrmttlejqom 'T'he f99o14d -lcrtls r'ent4in Erlglich ye.r -sl 'ons 9:f'tho lhiddpqlmeaildgs E ilh ôtst ij .a mlratb (lrocf éf tt'e, pàrântmla# ), C4rtalrilktheusendé t?fyalhsiateà v rdi 'wnuld quellfv,tö win the $M' i'lllcn challeng.T)* encw tlon (tonslation) rklos at* 'zosainvd here'.hp'x/e ,etcp*gpds.c,ûe tàhslMon.bsn) 4ni here'http'.//- zëfr.om,i' pdskem/sàf:rkhtéth>Th: translajôtj rttles i'nvckë 1) Thi besê ntprùber 6,' ntlmbem càn bextbnverted tolettel's and hijeàversl 2) $$ bocks cf the Blbb (blxk pïxitcn, bcok name, end bockabbrcviptipnl; A) The P4ri9,1iç .C' hac '3f Elpmifds. (Atpmit Number, Atcmi'c Skmb. :l,Atèmic Nétn4)', 4) Arabic @iid koMan Numèrals'.

.

I preptxe a èrdcc:l tô i4st *# claim bf a di#èrept s8t ct decoding.critdtfe, q.g someother base numberthan 66., ta ti#erent llsto? Sibb books. , bcek positlôrts, ânt b. cukatkreviptipns; iiffp*Atchart 'lfèlemkntj. lt is' pfojected th'et stteh dlffer:nt translationrtile: w'lll h:t pràdlatè mèanipjful trahsletlcn .s Ccpi'es rg:ethed cïf ië trénslflpnjpublibhad Iijë 14:.,/4 . trti'r lrtle qnnétMt,com/z' 01 I.Qà' 1 1 html

sv . r.: .

oa-: . Rl 1 7 / J /4/8.111:k1.4:-1.:112 -.----

20


*

. zlr ::. '.jrigjy1 je x*'#

'

. .

#4'I i'è'Eile Kdlt ï

'

iew Iools Yessage # p

p . : . .s .. . îj

.)j è ..V .. E,,jjReply Reply AII Forward Prlnt Delete Prevlous Next Addresses jiy/f

aem: irio

Date: Tuesday, il 0% 2012 7232 PMT'o: Banaclnek IREF; D,J , Grothe; Thomas Donnelly ; Brian T pson; [email protected]

subject: Re: Hey

T0: George slmpson; D.J. Grothe; Thomas Dnnnelly; brian Thompson

s tlb (lec- t : R e ) H e y

Exhibit 11

M r Simpson,

l have been giving your applications some serious thought as it is a hard one to really

set a scientific test with the information you have provided with your application.1 would like to proceed, however, 1 need some clarifcation since l see no real method,

no hidden language but rather coding if anything, and a 1ot of subjective answers. Forinstance in many of the coding you have done in the past, you reveal information about

people but it seems very subjective in the answers.lf your coding does reveal to you characteristics about people via their names. W e

could have you do a coding on people's names (as you have done in the past), and havethe people match the interpretations with themselves. That would be pn easy test. Butagains not clear on what you can and can not do other than find hidden words via what

looks like a tlexible code. l could be wrong and that is why I need clarification please.

So if you can answer the following questions for us, we may be able to proceed at a

better rate in putting some sort of protocol together.Please answer with short concise answers so we can understand better.

l . Please explain your claim in one sentence.2. Please explain how your ability is ''paranormal''.3. If your ''decoded words'' are ''English versions'', what is the language of the ''hidden

language''?

4. How is the language an objectively collected ''hidden language'', rather than asubjective interpretation?5. How do you propose your claim be tested?

Tharlk you. .

BanachekJREF Million Dollar Challenge Desk

Exhibit llI

21


# *

Answers to your questions -1. Please explain your claim in one sentence.

Something worth lsMillion shouldn't have to be answered in ''one sentence'' Thehidden Ianguage is used to translate hidden meanings contained in normal words

(Names, places, events, etc.). The translation method is defined by the decoding matrixdetailed upon www.etcorncods.com: (Books of the Bible, the number 66, RomanNumerals,' and the Periodic Chad of Elements) which allow the decoding of words with

astounding (paranormal) results.2. Please explain how your ability is ''paranormal''Read 1. The translation system is paranormal. I discovered it.3. If your ''decoded words'' are ''English versions'', what is the Ianguage of the ''hidden

Ianguage''?Read 1English words are deciphered to expose a family of hidden meanings inEnglish. The discovery is not unlike the discovery and deciphering of ancient

îanguages. Re: Rosetta Stone.4. How is the Ianguage an objectively collected ''hidden language'', rather than a subjective

interpretation?Don't have 1any ldea what you mean. And my guess5. How do you propose your claim be tested?

W hat have you been doing for the months, since your email told me you would need afew weeks before getting back to me7 My guess is, you are not up to the testing of my

paranormal demonstration.Read my application. 1 have suggested comparing the ET Corn Gods/language/gamein competition with an alternative-coding matrix of the same complexity. Rather than

coming up with rich translations (as with the ET Corn Gods language/game) the use ofthe alternative will come up with little to nothing. Read httn://ufoetbloc.com/?n=44lo

I have provided a sample randomly selected matrixes.Your questions indicate that you have no idea what my clajm is. You guys claim to be thechampions of Science and Critical thinking. The hidden language is Science - perhaps themost unusual science ever. The content of your email suggests the scientific/math

sophistication of a grade school student.Time is of the essence. You have refused to return my telephone calls, refused to return my

emails. I'm not used to dealing with such insulting indifference.You have used up my time. You are not operating in good faith. You have been fraudulent in

your dealings with me.You have a SlMillion challenge, but, under Florida law, your exposure is far greater than

is, you don't either.Read

SlMillion.Please get back to me in a week.

George Simpson

- inal M essage ---------- Clrlg

From : Banachek JREF

To: George Sim pson ; D.J. Grothe ; 'rhomas Donnelly ; Brian 'rhom pson

Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 3:30 PM

Subject: Re: Hey


*

i

i1l

11

M r Simpson,

I have been giving your applications some serious thought as it is a hard one to

really set a scientifc test with the information you have provided with yourapplication

.

1 would like to proceed, however, I need some claritkation since 1 see no real

method, no hidden language but rather coding if anything, and a 1ot of

subjedive answers. For instance in many of the coding you have done in thepast, you reveal information about people but it seems very subjective in theanSW CCS.

If your coding does reveal to you characteristics about people via their names.W e could have you d

o a coding on people's names (as you have done in thepast), and have the people match the interpretations with themselves

. Thatwould be an easy test. But again

, not clear on what you can and can not do otherthan find hidden words via what looks like a flexible code

. l could be wrong andthat is why I need claritkation please.

So if you can answer the following questions for us, we may be able to proceed

at a better rate in putting some so14 of protocol together.

Please answer with short concise answers so we can understand better.

1. Please explain your claim in one sentence.

2. Please explain how your ability is ''paranormal''.

3. If your ''decoded words'' are ''English versions'', what is the language of the

''hidden language''?

4. How is the language an objectively collected ''hidden language'', rather than a

subjective interpretation?

5. How do you propose yotlr claim be tested?

Thank you.

Banachek

JRF,F M illion Dollar Challenge Desk

ww w.randi.org

No virus found in this message.

1

1


Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 21 14/491 1 - Release Date: 04/02/12

24


# #

Exhibit IV, Random ly Selected Bible Books

ndom lly Gelleratêd BlbI9 ! Oi.s:

Elii : : :'i.:!.!IIE!II!!iIt.E(: :;: . . ., .jk.:r;L2 2..EL!i(E:1ïL,E..yj, g .:;... . '' .r . i , , .:;: ,,

' '' i,1!8ê ..E ((

mk-xdzn 4 zyimosvx, j x: (ay

> > M t.'rwfaam 4 a1 kyùrx..a 4 :12 ut,trmv= t é: àcA p @ ài :%W 8 X Y1 > pt : % !. r #: 47 ïi F> 1 i àe 1tèly.... it *..j y #yé j j jjj' jjbje --rxjq ji 4,j jKai Sj Q WQ VW b 1 6 17 : # itq j .4,4 k'r 1 vp:I i t; t.à ketx#v.- ## 1 wjj1 .,.-.-,..sr ;, jj j()f, jj tjBi 2j 4z R.iri- xêd4iglè 16 k: 1

x: azaa...ydWXX Q@ > WUtttxtN 24' : 51 'Xtutilàqdi/ 2*o kE.z. utw''li:: ;6' :# 111

aj xj jxky yjywe Irlrli ;;2!: . :

, , (::,,1, , , ,., , .g w y r : j g y. < . .* vpuu aj #; abq ti #à7 bqN .Fe b: 13 mhp:> - 3i é/ J.'

: jj < :z--Y/'NJ , ë . , ,w j w

YG Ae ài * Wheakcw zé 41 ?jkd&zii ake e Iii* dq Y i tv.: 4 1 2 j j rfer ktz à #?

' . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .

K4a 4: i kuiVi :i, d?:F<

Papv t

25


4

x ,tE 6 a :na1 N i q .46, ' *. 1A 4% y >$< : >

m/Ye 42.:' 92 : 4: 1c zr: n= u 6, p 1 1 N

i'hd $1 12' 1.:. . k ' k .' ,4y t 't1 blov Q2 1.3 W

g j j &4 .# Nq 54 1! tg g i y g gg jy ajgrq .rqmls A k $'r Tg: p. ,1T' 1: k:ux. .r y .. jg y jjrNll 8* r gé â) <.1 nr 3* 11 1; y @j @@ 9Q >1 Qm ' : '62' 2 ! 12 4, ,4 zq.z q 4 21 3. . . , x. . ..., . ., . . . . . 2. ' ox .. '< E .*. ' 'X XN 6 bè ' œ . Ro é':z j,:u ,,,i:E:. '

,) .

XO 6 1

26


4

Exhibit V, Random ly Selected Elem ents

Random Num ber G enerated

Atom ic Elem ents

i EE : ë jë ;r k ! E L##jj4# : !( p;4.o .(t, jj/lj! j#a, u, k yyj jjj; j gal :)!,

.;,.. . -.ï'

.:'

.

. .. L'.. (2!. ië.j.-.ë-j.'.'. :.. !''.E. '.ii;ë!:E(i!.'.

' .( :;'. .'-'

,ï. ..;.!:Ii!ii.!!!i! lq:ë ! .d . p. rë':-E'-E! .E. . L.L....., ..rë L:L (..'. . E.. i.Ep : . - : -:. k h : .: . : . . -. . .! . .

gjy Qj j gyy . C b1

j:tr y . <i

j Lm fup a ; C'flxfnr?

. 3 Trkmiyjpjcq k krkkxf 5 x- 9?F. -. -xzawj'q * 1tblkop 7 Hx:tkktkq j ài,tanyivl j ra$ j j :i, IX @lbsNrj 1 i Ibq ùksjyéj j g tjydq- kk db tytlasyjouf i4 J,pgsxmskrtx ià ,>qttll?l9 16 iif, jj jy rijjk:p'ct ?trii;à i b Li.tqmmgzmy i4 lqcdidgkf 20 dd

Ee/svzp Jï 4ekkpqjù) tittlki

.txtkeclc ïb tkf'l/dnil;!

.p .t4 Yf

ljrsupc li #8àwf 1è é9Vknlm ii /' #h zwi jà kxtj/iikz t4 tjy:*9 titl &'bWpfier àt u,ksuvreki' à jj #scrziez 33 dré'fkigclc jk *Wit/t 8% W1'hcioce bè 'T1

SXrkyiir 37 Ltiiéor- tjèj tji1Jaà ' 39 tj1?N, 9

.Yk'rgfe kù *; éuucxykj ti ) i'Jju

Pajti' 1


: 1 ' à

btfodFu.v , 42 Dt

ptmukpklh kt pi

Wprlxuid V Wpi'm'zhqr hà

. %

ttj u tjriq- m . .

r

àktopc jt àwljkssn kt &d ktd kt G. ! , jtEblt dt :

vi jj XJvp akkzikiprk # kk1,-)11k2. i'bjàqiql. . iii tlg .t #r?$.

Xvibb d4 *àigxùr ii éit'àèèiiji, tt t'JN/jdkkiùu ài N:kikxlk àt kftlékkjtaidlrq 5rj étbùiifikhika tt bu' . . . .

'

. .ïeybzfhoza, , 61 Bm) yj j u: jj jjaayi p

ttalpb? . 43:;Jji.k4usktkii ùh kàAe ohfyk dj éw'àkl kbsp dclàibpziplly G7 bù'/ k'tlns ijb:/fq

. , . , ..t; jj jj yj'! r5' tiqjro qzs it Uiiwa (x . . ry qko.,....F ,3 . - , .......Szfwwpj 72 SzY klG 73 YpCx!! ,îi....i- nnq

, ,7k

aà'r

Wviar ià Vt;. jjyjaq yjy u.; ,Giiidpx 'rz kaàytiù ib àykxx ië #sù8/A gt tJIAAleu ti #ijqù d1 dà(E 1' .? ùqi 1 #J b c'àtiomè/ N $%'txnqit 46 'tjEkksq 1 Emyoùzamh d/ yo' . . ..,.s.:. . . .. . . .

g .. .'tikntm 817.1%

#' tt-v t' J

28


4 'h4- #

Lgqkfbi? dù t.gdùlutew jt tzoEiikidlpimxpt

,j# EtJ'XPF 62 *tli bl # x ùj lkik

. q-.#&'h'iz @ F ijk Xjk'xrlei: .@ k!'paqkx 9è Aaëktkkw ki /1Waiàlùjq: W 94, y yjuju jj j. F?P . Fï'eajhj tùti h>I CiP9!?VO 1U1 6' Wlrzf/q 1t1 Wdyu j, yjju , ju gji .e .

tikiq/iù.. tlà, . ic.i k9Wik/swr 1t8 WhS'/fkieo'vn $ Yylzùhrtxuo 107 Mudkftmtù 1* ùktùGitikkhub idi tuI 9 -u si q 1 ' -H#' 'P V . ! 1 t 2 wYqYaybf wtiw 1 11 Y!q

. . u a .:z?y EtYhVV 1 12 Hk?if/kkkl i1j tiz dd 114 z.mTtl! FN yu,tlrqbnikày 1 it'

Pqge ..'

29


Documents

Q - éo&/-/ /477* · PDF file · 2016-01-12FM UD; MISREPM SENTATION AND ... ACTION FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT Here comes Plaintiff George R. Simpson, Prose,