Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PUTTING THE PIECES TOGETHER: DIRECTING A SUCCESSFUL MEP!
Dr. Edward Monaghan MEP New Directors’ Meeting March 11, 2019
The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and financial support to improve the educational opportunities and academic success
of migratory children, youth, agricultural workers, fishers, and their families.
AGENDA / OBJECTIVES
• Introduction – How do you define success for the MEP? • Barriers and resources • How do we use resources to achieve the MEP goal? • Our MEP results • Today’s accomplishments…leading to our success!
LEGAL PAGE
Statute Title I, Part C, Sections 1301; 1304(b)(1) and (2); 1304(c)(5); 1304(d); 1306(a)(1)(C) and (D).
Code of Federal Regulations 34 CFR 200.83; 200.84.
Guidance MEP Guidance, March, 2017. Chapter IV. Comprehensive and Service Delivery Plan, pages 43-52; Chapter VIII. Program Evaluation, pages 84-95.
3
INTRODUCTION – HOW DO YOU DEFINE SUCCESS FOR THE MEP?
4
WHAT DOES MEP SUCCESS LOOK LIKE?
Turn to a colleague and introduce yourself. Ask yourself this question, and take two minutes to explain to your colleague and hear from your colleague:
oHow do I define MEP “Success” in my SEA?
5
“MEP SUCCESS” REPORT-OUT
6
Process Output Outcome Result
GOAL OF THE MEP
The goal of the Migrant Education Program is to ensure that all migratory children reach challenging academic standards and graduate with a high school diploma (or complete a HSED) that…
7
GOAL OF THE MEP (CONTINUED)
1) Prepares them for responsible citizenship, 2) Further learning, and 3) Productive employment.
8
BARRIERS AND RESOURCES
9
WHAT ARE THE BARRIERS TO ACHIEVING THE MEP GOAL?
Ask yourself this question, and take a minute to explain to your colleague and hear from your colleague.
10
WHERE DO WE BEGIN IN PUTTING THE MEP PIECES TOGETHER? BARRIERS…
INPUT
Barriers:
Student Mobility
Instructional Time
School Engagement
Low SES/Educational Support
EL Status
Health
Access to Services
11
WHAT ARE THE RESOURCES THAT HELP US ACHIEVE THE MEP GOAL?
Ask yourself this question, and take a minute to explain to your colleague and hear from your colleague.
12
HOW DO WE BEGIN T0 PUT THE MEP PIECES TOGETHER? RESOURCES!
INPUT
Resources:
$374,751,000 Funding (FY 18)
OME Excellent Leadership, TA, & Financial Support
Consortium Grants
MSIX
13
HOW DO WE USE RESOURCES TO ACHIEVE THE MEP GOAL?
14
HOW DO WE USE MEP RESOURCES?
Activity at each table: 1. Identify a scribe 2. List as many activities and services as your group
can write down in 3 minutes. 3. The contest is on…GO!
15
THREE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE CRUCIAL TO SUCCESS
1. Creation of a comprehensive needs assessment
(CNA) 2. Creation and implementation of a service delivery
plan (SDP) 3. Creation and use of a written evaluation report
16
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT CYCLE
17
GROUP ACTIVITY
1. Comprehensive Needs Assessment 2. Service Delivery Plan 3. Written Evaluation Report
18
OUR MEP RESULTS
19
MEP READING/LA PROFICIENCY GPRA TARGETS AND ACTUAL DATA
27.8% 29.4% 28.3%
31.4% 33.4%
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
SY 2014-15 SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18
ActualTarget
20
READING/LA PROFICIENCY: COMPARISON GROUPS
39.4% 40.2% 39.6%
29.1% 30.0% 29.1%
41.7% 43.4% 43.1%
27.8% 29.4% 28.3%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
SY 2014-15 SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Low SESELHispanicMigrant
21
MEP MATHEMATICS PROFICIENCY GPRA TARGETS AND ACTUAL DATA
26.2% 28.5% 28.5%
30.5% 32.5%
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
SY 2014-15 SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18
ActualTarget
22
MATHEMATICS PROFICIENCY: COMPARISON GROUPS
35.0% 36.7%
39.6%
26.4%
30.4% 31.1%
37.0% 39.2%
40.3%
26.2% 28.5% 28.5%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
SY 2014-15 SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Low SESELHispanicMigrant
23
PFS SERVICES: LEADING INDICATOR TARGETS AND ACTUAL DATA
66.2% 66.2% 66.7% 67.2%
85.4% 85.9% 86.4% 66.2%
83.4% 82.3% 82.3% 84.9%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
SY 2012-13 SY 2013-14 SY 2014-15 SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18 SY 2018-19 SY 2019-20
PFS Services
TargetActual
24
GRADES 7-12 INSTRUCTIONAL AND/OR SUPPORT SERVICES: LEADING INDICATOR TARGETS AND ACTUAL DATA
35.8% 35.8% 36.3% 37.8%
75.6% 76.1% 76.6%
35.8%
45.6% 46.5%
74.6% 75.1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
SY 2012-13 SY 2013-14 SY 2014-15 SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18 SY 2018-19 SY 2019-20
Grades 7-12 Instructional and/or Support Services
TargetActual
25
EIGHTH GRADE MATHEMATICS PROFICIENCY: LEADING INDICATOR TARGETS AND ACTUAL DATA
28.0% 28.5% 29.0% 24.9% 29.3% 27.5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
SY 2014-15 SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18 SY 2018-19 SY 2019-20
Eighth Grade Mathematics Proficiency
TargetActual
26
TODAY’S ACCOMPLISHMENTS
27
MIGRANT EDUCATION PROGRAM – LOGIC MODEL
Leading Indicators
1. Percent of PFS
Served
2. Percent Grades 7-12 Received Services
3. Percent Received Full Credit for Algebra I
IMPACT Gap Reduction in Student Achievement in Elementary School, Middle School, & High School Increased Graduation Rate Increased Post-Secondary Participation
RESULTS
Improved Student Proficiency in Reading/LA & Mathematics Improved Secondary Student Promotion & Graduation Improved Algebra I Success Rate
OUTCOMES
Increased Percentage of PFS Students Receiving Services Increased Percentage of Secondary Students Receiving Services Increased Percentage of 8tj Grade Students Proficient in Mathematics
OUTPUT
Children Recruited & Identified MSIX Facilitates Records Transfer & Coordination Children’s Secondary Course History Collected for Purpose of Credit Accrual Children Served, Particularly PFS, With Instructional Services, & Support Services w/Breakout of Counseling Children Referred to Other Programs Children Served Under COS Authority
PROCESS SEA Grants Provide Resources For: Instructional & Support Services Identification & Recruitment Re-Interviewing CNA/SDP/ Evaluation Coordination of Services Parent Involvement Collection of Data Within EDFacts and MSIX Technical Assistance & Monitoring of Award & Subawards
INPUT
Resources: $374,751,000 Funding (FY 16) OME Excellent Leadership, TA, & Financial Support Consortium Grants MSIX Barriers: Student Mobility Instructional Time School Engagement Low SES/Educational Support EL Status Health Access to Services
