8
THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 0 1986 by The American Society of Biological Chemists, Inc. Vol. 261, No. 27, Issue of September 25, pp. 12759-12766, 1986 Printed in U. S. A. Purification and Characterization of a Novel Inhibitor of Urokinase from Human Urine QUANTITATION AND PRELIMINARY CHARACTERIZATION IN PLASMA* (Received for publication, May 15, 1986) David C. Stump$, Marc Thienpont,and DesireColleng From the Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, University of Leuuen, Leuven, Belgium Urokinase-relatedproteinsin human urine occur mainly as a 1:1 complex of urokinase with an inhibitor (Stump, D. C., Thienpont, M., and Collen, D. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 1267-1273). BALB/c mice were im- munized with this urokinase-urokinase inhibitor com- plex and spleen cells fused with mouse myeloma cells, resulting in hybridomas producing monoclonal anti- bodies. Three antibodies reacting with the complex but not with urokinase were utilized to develop a sensitive (0.5 ng/ml) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the urokinase inhibitor, which was used for monitoring its purification by chromatography on zinc chelate- Sepharose,concanavalinA-Sepharose,SP-Sephadex C-50, and Sephadex G-100. A homogeneous glycoprotein of apparent M, 50,000 was obtained with a yield of 40 pg/liter urine and a purification factor of 320. Onemg of the purified protein inhibited 35,000 IU of urokinase within 30 min at 37 "C. This protein was immunologically related to both the purified urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex and to the inhibitor portion dissociated from it by nucleophilic dissociation. It was immunologically distinct from all known protease inhibitors, including the endothelial cell-derivedfast-acting inhibitor of tis- sue-type plasminogen activator, the placental inhibitor of urokinase and protease nexin. In electrophoresis the protein migrated with &mobility. Inhibition of uroki- nase occurred with a second order rate constant (k) of 8 x lo3 M" s-' in the absence and of 9 X lo4 M" s" in the presence of 50 IU of heparin/ml. The urokinase inhibitor was inactive towards single-chain urokinase- type plasminogen activator and plasmin, but it inhib- ited two-chain tissue-type plasminogen activator with a k below lo3 M" s" and thrombin with a k of 4 X lo4 M" s" in the absence and 2 X lo6 M" s" in the presence of heparin. The concentration of this urokinase inhibitor in plasmafromnormalsubjectsdetermined by immu- noassay was 2 2 0.7 pg/ml (mean f S.D., n = 25). The proteinpurifiedfromplasmabyimmunoabsorption had the same M,, amino acid composition, and immu- noreactivity as the urinary protein. Furthermore, *This study was supported by grants from the Geconcerteerde Onderzoeksacties and the Fonds voor Geneeskundig Wetenschappel- ijk Onderzoek. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. $Recipient of Clinical Investigator Award HL 01176 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Permanent address: Dept. of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405. 8 To whom correspondence should be addressed Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, Campus Gasthuisberg, Onder- wijs en Navorsing, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. when urokinase was added to plasma, time-dependent urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex formation was observed at a rate similar to that observed for the inhibition of urokinase by the purified inhibitor from urine. This urokinase inhibitor, purified from human urine, most probably represents a new plasma protease inhibitor. Urokinase was identified in urine over 35 years ago (1-3) and subsequently purified (4, 5). It has been produced com- mercially for use as a thrombolytic agent, but its exactplace in the management of thromboembolic disease remains to be defined. Recently, a single-chain form of urokinase was also recognized in human urine (6), and a straightforward proce- dure for its purification was subsequently developed (7). Un- expectedly, however, the majority of urokinase isolated from urine was obtained as an M, 95,000 complex between uroki- nase and an inhibitor of apparent M, 50,000 (7). The purpose of thepresentstudy was topurifyandcharacterizethis urokinase inhibitor from urine. In doing so, we demonstrate its presence in plasma as a previously unrecognized protease inhibitor. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Materials Human urokinase, single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen acti- vator and urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex were purified from human urine (7). Human tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA') was purified from cultured melanoma cells as described (8). Human thrombin (Topostasine @) was obtained from Roche. Human plasmin was produced by activation of human plasminogen with streptokinase (9). Chromogenic substrates pyroglutamyl-Gly-Arg-p-nitroanilide (S- 24441, D-Val-Leu-Lys-p-nitroanilide (S-2251), D-Ile-Pro-Arg-p-ni- troanilide (S-22881, and D-Phe-pipecolyl-Arg-p-nitroanilide (S-2238) were all from Kahi. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG were prepared according to Nakane and Kawaoi (10). o-Phenylenediamine was from Fluka. The International Reference Preparation for uroki- nase (66/46) was obtained from Dr. P. J. Gaffney, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, London, United Kingdom. The synthetic urokinase inhibitor Glu-Gly-Arg-CH,CI was custom-syn- thesized by Union Chimique Belge (Brussels, Belgium). Zinc chelate-Sepharose was prepared according to Porath et al. ' The abbreviations used are: t-PA, tissue-type plasminogen acti- vator; S-2444 or pyroglutamyl-Gly-Arg-p-nitroanilide, L-pyrogluta- myl-glycyl-L-arginine-p-nitroanilide hydrochloride; S-2251 or D-Val- Leu-Lys-p-nitroanilide, H-D-valyl-L-leucyl-L-lysine-p-nitroanilide hydrochloride; S-2288 or D-Ile-Pro-Arg-p-nitroanilide, H-D-isoleucyl- L-prolyl-L-arginine-p-nitroanilide dihydrochloride; S-2238 or D-Phe- pipecolyl-Arg-p-nitroanilide,H-D-phenylalanyl-L-pipecolyl-L-argi- nine-p-nitroanilide dihydrochloride; ELISA, enzyme-linked immu- nosorbent assay; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PEG, polyethylene glycol. 12759

Purification and Characterization of Novel Inhibitor of ... · David C. Stump$, Marc Thienpont ... column of purified urokinase inhibitor coupled to cyanogen bromide- ... tory activity

  • Upload
    vankiet

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 0 1986 by The American Society of Biological Chemists, Inc.

Vol. 261, No. 27, Issue of September 25, pp. 12759-12766, 1986 Printed in U. S. A .

Purification and Characterization of a Novel Inhibitor of Urokinase from Human Urine QUANTITATION AND PRELIMINARY CHARACTERIZATION IN PLASMA*

(Received for publication, May 15, 1986)

David C. Stump$, Marc Thienpont, and Desire Colleng From the Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, University of Leuuen, Leuven, Belgium

Urokinase-related proteins in human urine occur mainly as a 1: 1 complex of urokinase with an inhibitor (Stump, D. C., Thienpont, M., and Collen, D. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 1267-1273). BALB/c mice were im- munized with this urokinase-urokinase inhibitor com- plex and spleen cells fused with mouse myeloma cells, resulting in hybridomas producing monoclonal anti- bodies. Three antibodies reacting with the complex but not with urokinase were utilized to develop a sensitive (0.5 ng/ml) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the urokinase inhibitor, which was used for monitoring its purification by chromatography on zinc chelate- Sepharose, concanavalin A-Sepharose, SP-Sephadex C-50, and Sephadex G-100.

A homogeneous glycoprotein of apparent M , 50,000 was obtained with a yield of 40 pg/liter urine and a purification factor of 320. One mg of the purified protein inhibited 35,000 IU of urokinase within 30 min at 37 "C. This protein was immunologically related to both the purified urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex and to the inhibitor portion dissociated from it by nucleophilic dissociation. It was immunologically distinct from all known protease inhibitors, including the endothelial cell-derived fast-acting inhibitor of tis- sue-type plasminogen activator, the placental inhibitor of urokinase and protease nexin. In electrophoresis the protein migrated with &mobility. Inhibition of uroki- nase occurred with a second order rate constant ( k ) of 8 x lo3 M" s-' in the absence and of 9 X lo4 M" s" in the presence of 50 IU of heparin/ml. The urokinase inhibitor was inactive towards single-chain urokinase- type plasminogen activator and plasmin, but it inhib- ited two-chain tissue-type plasminogen activator with a k below lo3 M" s" and thrombin with a k of 4 X lo4 M" s" in the absence and 2 X lo6 M" s" in the presence of heparin.

The concentration of this urokinase inhibitor in plasma from normal subjects determined by immu- noassay was 2 2 0.7 pg/ml (mean f S.D., n = 25). The protein purified from plasma by immunoabsorption had the same M,, amino acid composition, and immu- noreactivity as the urinary protein. Furthermore,

*This study was supported by grants from the Geconcerteerde Onderzoeksacties and the Fonds voor Geneeskundig Wetenschappel- ijk Onderzoek. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

$Recipient of Clinical Investigator Award HL 01176 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Permanent address: Dept. of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405.

8 To whom correspondence should be addressed Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, Campus Gasthuisberg, Onder- wijs en Navorsing, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.

when urokinase was added to plasma, time-dependent urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex formation was observed at a rate similar to that observed for the inhibition of urokinase by the purified inhibitor from urine. This urokinase inhibitor, purified from human urine, most probably represents a new plasma protease inhibitor.

Urokinase was identified in urine over 35 years ago (1-3) and subsequently purified (4, 5 ) . It has been produced com- mercially for use as a thrombolytic agent, but its exact place in the management of thromboembolic disease remains to be defined. Recently, a single-chain form of urokinase was also recognized in human urine (6), and a straightforward proce- dure for its purification was subsequently developed (7). Un- expectedly, however, the majority of urokinase isolated from urine was obtained as an M , 95,000 complex between uroki- nase and an inhibitor of apparent M , 50,000 (7). The purpose of the present study was to purify and characterize this urokinase inhibitor from urine. In doing so, we demonstrate its presence in plasma as a previously unrecognized protease inhibitor.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Human urokinase, single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen acti- vator and urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex were purified from human urine (7). Human tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA') was purified from cultured melanoma cells as described (8). Human thrombin (Topostasine @) was obtained from Roche. Human plasmin was produced by activation of human plasminogen with streptokinase (9). Chromogenic substrates pyroglutamyl-Gly-Arg-p-nitroanilide ( S - 24441, D-Val-Leu-Lys-p-nitroanilide (S-2251), D-Ile-Pro-Arg-p-ni- troanilide (S-22881, and D-Phe-pipecolyl-Arg-p-nitroanilide (S-2238) were all from Kahi. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG were prepared according to Nakane and Kawaoi (10). o-Phenylenediamine was from Fluka. The International Reference Preparation for uroki- nase (66/46) was obtained from Dr. P. J. Gaffney, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, London, United Kingdom. The synthetic urokinase inhibitor Glu-Gly-Arg-CH,CI was custom-syn- thesized by Union Chimique Belge (Brussels, Belgium).

Zinc chelate-Sepharose was prepared according to Porath et al.

' The abbreviations used are: t-PA, tissue-type plasminogen acti- vator; S-2444 or pyroglutamyl-Gly-Arg-p-nitroanilide, L-pyrogluta- myl-glycyl-L-arginine-p-nitroanilide hydrochloride; S-2251 or D-Val- Leu-Lys-p-nitroanilide, H-D-valyl-L-leucyl-L-lysine-p-nitroanilide hydrochloride; S-2288 or D-Ile-Pro-Arg-p-nitroanilide, H-D-isoleucyl- L-prolyl-L-arginine-p-nitroanilide dihydrochloride; S-2238 or D-Phe- pipecolyl-Arg-p-nitroanilide, H-D-phenylalanyl-L-pipecolyl-L-argi- nine-p-nitroanilide dihydrochloride; ELISA, enzyme-linked immu- nosorbent assay; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PEG, polyethylene glycol.

12759

12760 Urinary Urokinase Inhibitor (11). Concanavalin A-Sepharose, SP-Sephadex C-50, Sephadex G-

Sepharose 4B were from Pharmacia P-L Biochemicals. All other 100 superfine, protein A-Sepharose, and cyanogen bromide-activated

chemicals and reagents were of standard laboratory grade. Rabbit antibodies to the urinary urokinase inhibitor were prepared

as follows. New Zealand White rabbits were injected subcutaneously with 100 fig of protein purified from urine, in complete Freund's adjuvant, followed by two equal doses in incomplete Freund's at biweekly intervals. Immune serum was obtained 7-10 days after the third injection, and IgG was prepared by chromatography on protein A-Sepharose (12). Monospecific anti-urokinase inhibitor IgG was obtained by chromatography of the immune IgG fraction on a 3-ml column of purified urokinase inhibitor coupled to cyanogen bromide- activated Sepharose 4B (0.5 mg/ml swollen gel). The affinity-purified anti-urokinase inhibitor IgG were eluted from the column with 0.15 M NaCI, 0.1 M glycine.HC1 buffer, pH 2.2, and the pH was immedi- ately adjusted to 7-8 by the dropwise addition of 1.0 M Tris. HCI buffer, pH 9.0. After overnight dialysis against 0.15 M NaC1, 0.02 M NaH2P04 buffer, pH 7.4, the purified antibodies were stored frozen a t -20 "C.

Monoclonal antibodies to the urokinase-urokinase inhibitor com- plex were prepared essentially as previously described (7) using the method of Galfri. and Milstein (13) with P3X63-Ag8-6.5.3 mouse myeloma cells obtained from Dr. 0. Schonherr, Organon, Oss, The Netherlands. Hybridomas were screened for antibodies against the urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex that did not react with uro- kinase as follows. Microtiter plates (Titertek), coated with either urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex or urokinase were incubated with conditioned medium, and bound antibody was quantitated with peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG. Positive wells were subcloned by limiting dilution, and purified antibodies were isolated from ascites obtained after injection of hybridoma cells into pristane- prepared mice by chromatography on protein A-Sepharose (12) and elution with glycine.HC1 buffer, pH 2.2. From a total of seven antibodies, reacting specifically with the urinary urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex but not with urokinase, three (llD4H7, 7B5F7, and 10B5D10) were used to develop the ELISA for the urokinase inhibitor, and one (10A6A10) was used for immunoadsorption chro- matography. Two monoclonal antibodies to urokinase (4DlE8 and 10D3G10) were prepared and characterized as described (14).

Rabbit antisera to human a,-macroglobulin, antithrombin 111, and al-antitrypsin were obtained from Behringwerke (Marburg/Lahn, West Germany). Rabbit antisera to human a2-antiplasmin were pro- duced as described (15). Rabbit antiserum against the human placen- tal inhibitor of urokinase was a gift from Dr. E. Kruithof, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire du Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Methods Immunoadsorption of the Urokinase Inhibitor from Urine on In-

solubilized Monoclonal Antibody-A monoclonal antibody reacting with the urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex but not with uroki- nase (10AGA10) was coupled to cyanogen bromide-activated Sepha- rose 4B (2 mg/ml gel) as described above. One liter of fresh human urine was collected on 5 mM benzamidine (Janssen, Beerse, Belgium), the pH was adjusted to 7.5 with NaOH, and the urine was cooled to 4 "C in an ice water bath and was then centrifuged at 6000 x g for 30 min at 4 "C. The supernatant was decanted and applied to a 5-ml column of 10A6AlO-Sepharose a t a flow rate of 10 ml/h a t 4 "C. After loading, the column was washed first with 10 volumes of 0.15 M NaC1, 0.02 M NaH,P04 buffer, pH 7.5, containing 5 mM benzamidine and then with the same buffer without bemamidine until the absorbance at 280 nm was below 0.01 (5 to 10 column volumes). The column was then eluted with 25 ml of 2 M KSCN, collecting fractions of 2.5 ml. Fractions containing protein were pooled (generally 10 ml), concen- trated to 1 ml by dialysis against PEG 20,000, and then dialyzed against 0.15 M NaCI, 0.02 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, prior to further analysis.

Assays of Urokinase Inhibitory Actiuity-Urokinase inhibition was measured as follows. Samples or dilutions of the urokinase inhibitor in 80-~1 volumes of 0.15 M NaC1, 0.02 M NaH,PO, buffer, pH 7.5, were added to 10 pl of the same buffer containing 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin with or without heparin (Roche), 50 IU/ml. After 5 min at 37 "C, 10 ~1 of a solution of urokinase (300 IU/ml) was added and the total 100-pl sample was further incubated at 37 "C for 30 min. Each sample was then diluted by addition of 800 MI of 0.038 M NaC1, 0.05 M Tris.HCI buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.01% Tween 80 and 0.33 mM chromogenic substrate S-2444. Residual urokinase ac-

tivity was determined from the change in absorbance at 405 nm. Results obtained were expressed as international units (IU) of uro- kinase inhibited by 1 mg of protein. Alternatively, urokinase inhibi- tory activity was determined by measurement of plasminogen acti- vation in the presence of the chromogenic substrate S-2251 (7) or in a fibrin-clot lysis assay as previously described (7).

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for the Urokinase Inhibitor-Three monoclonal antibodies reacting with the urokinase- urokinase inhibitor complex but not with urokinase were identified as reacting with distinct antigenic epitopes on the complex during double immunodiffusion analysis as described by Ouchterlony (16). TWO of these (llD4H7 and 7B5F7) were diluted in 0.1 M bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6, to a final concentration of 5 pg/ml each, and then 200 ~l were incubated in each of 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates for 72 h a t 4 "C. The plates were then emptied and remaining active sites were blocked by incubation with 0.14 M NaCI, 0.01 M NaH,PO,, pH 7.2, containing 0.01% Tween 80 and 1% bovine serum albumin for 1.5 h at 37 "C. The plates were then washed with the same buffer without albumin just prior to use. Plates to be stored were incubated with 200 pllwell of buffer containing 100 g of mannitol and 20 g of sucrose/liter for 3 min at room temperature, emptied, covered, and kept at -20 "C. Just before use, each plate was washed three times with phosphate buffer.

Test samples or calibration mixtures were incubated in 180-pl aliquots/well for 2 h a t 37 "C or overnight a t 4 "C. After washing the plates six times with phosphate buffer, 170 p1 of a third antibody (10B5D10) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase was added a t a final concentration of 0.09 pg/ml in phosphate buffer containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin. After a 1-h incubation at 37 "C, the plates were washed eight times with phosphate buffer, and then 150 p1 of the peroxidase substrate o-phenylenediamine in 0.1 M citrate, 0.2 M phosphate buffer, pH 5.0, containing 0.003% hydrogen peroxide, was added per well. After 30 min a t room temperature the reaction was stopped with 50 pl of 4 M H,SO,, and the absorbance was measured at 492 nm with a multiscan spectrophotometer (Titertek).

Purification of the Urokinase Inhibitor from Human Urine- Freshly voided urine from male laboratory personnel was collected at room temperature on benzamidine (5 mM final concentration) and accumulated for no longer than 6 h. The urine was then cooled by immersion in in an ice-water bath, after which all subsequent steps were carried out a t 4 "C. The urine was adjusted in pH to 7.5 with NaOH and centrifugedat 6000 X g for 30 min at 4 "C. The supernatant was applied to a 10 X 15-cm column of zinc chelate-Sepharose at a flow rate of 500 ml/h. After 24 liters were applied, the column was washed with 1 liter of 0.3 M NaCI, 0.02 M NaH2P0, buffer, pH 7.5, containing 5 mM benzamidine, stirred, and washed with an additional 2 liters of the same buffer. The column was then eluted with the same buffer containing 0.05 M imidazole, collecting 20-ml fractions. Frac- tions containing protein were pooled (usually about 1 liter), adjusted to pH 7.5 with 1 M HCI, and applied directly at a flow rate of 20 ml/ h to a 2 X 6.5-cm column of concanavalin A-Sepharose equilibrated with 0.15 M NaCI, 0.02 M NaH2P04 buffer, pH 7.5, containing 5 mM benzamidine. The column was washed first with 100 ml of equilibra- tion buffer and then with equilibration buffer without benzamidine until the absorbance at 280 nm was below 0.05 (5 to 10 column volumes). The column was then eluted with 0.15 M NaCl, 0.02 M NaH2P04 buffer, pH 7.5, containing 0.5 M methyl-a-D-glucopyrano- side at a flow rate of 10 ml/h, collecting fractions of 5 ml. Fractions containing protein were pooled (usually about 80 ml) and dialyzed against 0.02 M NaC1,0.02 M NaH2P0, buffer, pH 6.8, to a conductance equal to that of the dialysis buffer. The dialyzed sample was then applied to a 0.9 X 13-cm column of SP-Sephadex C-50, equilibrated with dialysis buffer, at a flow rate of 5 ml/h. The column was washed with the same buffer until the absorbance at 280 nm was less than 0.05 and then a linear 60-ml NaCl gradient from 0.02 to 0.5 M was applied. Two-ml fractions, containing urokinase inhibitor-related an- tigen, as measured with the ELISA described above, were pooled (usually about 20 ml) and concentrated to 2 ml by dialysis against solid PEG 20,000. This sample was dialyzed against 1 liter of 0.3 M NaC1,O.OZ M NaH,P04 buffer, pH 7.5, and applied to a 1.5 X 90-cm column of Sephadex G-100 superfine a t a flow rate of 4 ml/h. Two- ml fractions were assayed for both urokinase inhibitor-related antigen and urokinase inhibitory activity, and enriched fractions were pooled for further analysis.

Isolation of the Urokinose Inhibitor from Human Plosma-Blood samples were collected by venipuncture in 0.1 volume of 0.11 M citrate, and plasma was obtained following centrifugation at 3000 X g for 10 min at 4 "C. Five hundred ml of plasma were applied at 20

Urinary Urokinase Inhibitor 12761

ml/h at 4 "C to a 10-ml column of monoclonal antibody 10A6A10- Sepharose prepared as above, which was equilibrated with 0.15 M NaCl, 0.02 M NaH,PO, buffer, pH 7.5, containing 0.01 M sodium citrate. After loading, the column was washed with the same buffer until the absorbance at 280 nm was below 0.05. The column was then eluted with 2 M KSCN and protein-containing fractions were pooled and dialyzed against column buffer. The dialyzed pool was then reapplied to a 2-ml column of 10A6AlO-Sepharose at a flow rate of 4 ml/h, followed by a buffer wash and 2 M KSCN elution. Protein- containing fractions were pooled (generally about 5 ml), concentrated against solid PEG to 2 ml, dialyzed against gel filtration buffer, and applied to a Sephadex G-100 superfine column as described above. Fractions enriched in urokinase inhibitor-related antigen as measured by ELISA were pooled for further analysis.

Characterization of the Urokinase Inhibitor-Sodium dodecyl sul- fate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed on 10% slab gels according to Laemmli (17). Reduction of disulfide bonds was achieved with 0.05 M dithioerythritol and staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Immunodiffusion analysis was performed according to Ouchterlony (16). Immunoblotting was performed after transferring protein from SDS-PAGE gels to nitrocellulose sheets by the method of Towbin et al. (18). The sheets were blotted with monospecific rabbit IgG antibodies (20 pg/ml) to either urokinase or urinary urokinase inhibitor, as previously described (7). Crossed immunoelectrophoresis using monospecific rabbit IgG against the urokinase inhibitor was performed according to Clarke and Freeman (19). Amino acid analysis was performed with a Beckman 119CL amino acid analyzer after sample hydrolysis with 6 M HC1 in uacuo at 110 "C for 22 h. Inhibition rates for urokinase were measured by determining residual activity at timed intervals with S-2444 as de- scribed above. Inhibition rates were similarly measured for plasmin (5 nM) with S-2251 (0.6 mM), for two-chain t-PA (9 nM) with S-2288 (1 mM), and for thrombin (1.2 nM) with S-2238 (0.1 mM). Inhibition rates for single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator were measured by determining residual plasminogen activation rates in the presence of excess S-2251 (1 mM).

ELISA for Urokinase-Urokinase Inhibitor Complex in Plasma- Microtiter plates were coated with two monoclonal antibodies (4DlE8 and 10D3G10) as described (14). Remaining active sites were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin and the plates were stored in the same manner as described above. After washing with phosphate buffer, test samples or calibration mixtures containing purified uro- kinase-urokinase inhibitor complex were incubated in 180-pl volumes either for 2 h at 37 "C or overnight at 4 "C. After washing, the plates were incubated with the same horseradish peroxidase-conjugated monoclonal antibody to the urokinase inhibitor (10B5D10) utilized in the ELISA for urokinase inhibitor described above. Quantitation of the bound conjugate was performed in the same manner with o- phenylenediamine.

FIG. 1. Dose response of uroki- nase inhibitor in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A, absorbance at 492 nm with increasing concentra- tions of urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex (0) and of purified urokinase inhibitor (0); B, absorbance of 492 nm with increasing volume fractions of pooled human urine (0) or citrated plasma (0).

RESULTS

ELISA for the Urokinase Inhibitor-The ELISA for the urokinase inhibitor was based on three monoclonal antibodies directed against nonoverlapping epitopes of the non-uroki- nase portion of the urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex. I t measured both the complex and the subsequently purified urokinase inhibitor similarly in a concentration range of 4 to 40 PM (0.5 to 5 ng/ml inhibitor), with a linear dose response (Fig. IA). When either pooled human urine and citrated plasma were assayed, a linear dose response between 0 and 1% (v/v) for urine and between 0 and 0.1% (v/v) for plasma was obtained. When ultimately calibrated against known con- centrations of purified urinary urokinase inhibitor, the con- centrations in these individual samples were determined to be 0.15 and 3 pg/ml, respectively. The assay could be per- formed in one working day, which made its use to monitor the purification of the urokinase inhibitor from human urine practical.

Purification of the Urokinase Inhibitor from Urine-Initial purification of the urokinase inhibitor was performed by chromatography of fresh urine on the insolubilized monoclo- nal antibody 10A6A10. Material eluted from this column with 2 M KSCN contained a major protein band migrating with an apparent M , of 50,000 on SDS-PAGE and in addition several minor high M , bands (not shown). However, this material was inactive, presumably due to exposure to denaturants during its elution from the immunoadsorption column

Therefore, an alternative purification procedure was devel- oped in which the chromatographic behavior of the inhibitor was monitored with the ELISA described above. The results are summarized in Table I. Fresh human urine was collected on 5 mM benzamidine to inhibit proteolytic activity and to prevent further complex formation of urinary serine proteases with the urokinase inhibitor. Starting urokinase inhibitor- related antigen concentrations in urine were variable but generally averaged 200 ng/ml. In the first step, chromatogra- phy of cooled, pH-adjusted, human urine on zinc chelate- Sepharose resulted in 75% adsorption of urokinase inhibitor- related antigen. Elution with imidazole resulted in a recovery of 50% of the original antigen with a 30-fold volume reduction and a 10-fold purification. Direct application of this eluate to concanavalin A-Sepharose gave 90% adsorption of urokinase

2 4 6 UROKINASE INHIBITOR A N T I G E N (nglrnl)

2 0 -

1 5 -

1 PLASMA CONCENTRATION ( % )

0 1 0 2 03

1 1 2 3

URINE CONCENTRATION ( $ 1

12762 Urinary Urokinase Inhibitor TABLE I

Purification of urokinase inhibitor from human urine The results represent mean values of six experiments.

Total protein

Total urokinase inhibitor

Total urokinase

inhibitor/total protein

Volume Yield Purification factor

ml mg Urine 24,000 1,600 Zinc chelate-Sepharose 800 73 Concanavalin A 80 19 SP-Sephadex C-50 22 2 Sephadex G-100 10 0.9

Determined by ELISA.

FRACTION NUMBER

FIG. 2. Elution profile of protein and urokinase inhibitor- related antigen from SP-Sephadex C-50 with a NaCl gra- dient. 80 ml of dialyzed material from the concanavalin A-Sepharose column was applied at a rate of 5 ml/h to an 8-ml column and elution was performed with a linear NaCl gradient (- - -) from 0.05 to 0.5 M. Fractions of 2 ml were collected. W, absorbance at 280 nm; C- "0, urokinase inhibitor-related antigen. Fractions 15 to 26 were pooled and concentrated 10-fold for further purification.

inhibitor-related antigen whereas free urokinase was not bound. Elution with 0.5 M methyl-a-D-glucopyranoside re- sulted in a recovery of 43 percent of the original starting urokinase inhibitor-related antigen, with an additional 4-fold purification and 10-fold volume reduction.

The extensively dialyzed eluate was applied to an SP- Sephadex C-50 column. Ninety percent of the protein passed through the column unbound, while 85% of the urokinase inhibitor-related antigen was adsorbed. Elution with a linear 0.02-0.5 M NaCl gradient yielded the profile shown in Fig. 2. The bound proteins eluted in two partially separated peaks, the second of which contained the urokinase inhibitor-related antigen as measured by ELISA. The pooled fractions con- tained 33% of the original urokinase inhibitor-related antigen with a purification factor of 260. Final purification was ob- tained by gel filtration of a 10-fold concentrate of this pool on Sephadex G-100 superfine. Fractions eluting from this column were assayed both for urokinase inhibitor-related antigen content and for inhibition of urokinase amidolytic activity (Fig. 3). One main peak of urokinase inhibitor-related antigen and urokinase inhibitory activity was observed, coe- luting with a protein peak a t approximate M , 55,000. A sample of this protein peak was analyzed on SDS-PAGE as shown in

mg" %" 4.9 0.0032 100 1 2.4 0.033 49 10 2.1 0.11 43 36 1.6 0.81 33 260 0.9 1.0 18 320

Fig. 4. One main protein band was observed, migrating with an apparent M , 50,000 under both nonreducing (A, lune 3) and reducing (B, lane 3 ) conditions. This protein comigrated with the nonreducible portion of hydroxylamine-digested ( A and B, lanes 2) purified urokinase-urokinase inhibitor com- plex ( A and B, lunes 1 ) in contrast to urokinase which reduced to two polypeptides M , 33,000 and 20,000 (A and B, lunes 5 ) . The final yield was 0.9 mg of protein, representing 18% of the urokinase inhibitor-related antigen present in the 24-liter starting urine pool, which was obtained with a 320-fold puri- fication factor.

Characterization of the Urokinase Inhibitor from Urine- The purified urokinase inhibitor was analyzed by double immunodiffusion as shown in Fig. 5. It did not cross-react with antibodies to urokinase ( A , spot Z), which reacted both with purified urokinase ( A , spot 4 ) and with urokinase-uro- kinase inhibitor complex ( A , spot 3 ) . Monospecific antibodies isolated from the serum of rabbits immunized with the puri- fied urokinase inhibitor reacted both with the urokinase in- hibitor (B, spot 2) and the urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex ( B , spot 3 ) but not with urokinase (B, spot 4 ) , suggesting that the purified urokinase inhibitor is identical to the protein which forms complexes with urokinase in urine. This was confirmed by immunoblotting of proteins trans- ferred to nitrocellulose from reduced SDS gels similar to those of Fig. 4B. As shown in Fig. 6, both the urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex ( A , lane 1 ) and its dissociated subunits ( A , lane 2 ) were all reactive with rabbit antibodies to urokinase except for the M , 50,000 nonreducible component of the digest. This component did, however, react with rabbit anti- bodies to the urinary urokinase inhibitor (B, lane 2) similarly to the urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex (B, lane 1 ) and the urokinase inhibitor itself (B, lane 3 ) . This establishes that the purified urokinase inhibitor is indeed the protein which forms a complex with urokinase in urine.

The purified urokinase inhibitor did not cross-react with antiserum to the known plasma protease inhibitors anti- thrombin 111, az-antiplasmin, al-antitrypsin, or a2-macroglob- ulin. In addition, it did not react with antisera to the urokinase inhibitor from human placenta, protease nexin,' or the en- dothelial fast-acting t-PA i n h i b i t ~ r . ~ Furthermore, testing against a broad panel of antisera to 52 known plasma proteins did not result in a positive identification?

Crossed immunoelectrophoresis (Fig. 7) using monospecific antibodies to the urokinase inhibitor showed that it migrated as a @-globulin (Fig. 7 A ) when compared to normal plasma (Fig. 7 B ) . Crossed immunoelectrophoresis of total human plasma using antibodies to the urokinase inhibitor did not

J. Baker, personal communication. D. Loskutoff, personal communication. J. Pacques, personal communication.

Urinary Urokinase Inhibitor 12763

void 94 67 43

t t t t f 20

FIG. 3. Gel filtration pattern of protein, urokinase inhibitor-related antigen, and urokinase inhibitor ac- tivity on Sephadex G-100 super- fine. 2 ml of concentrated material, eluted from SP-Sephadex C-50, was ap- plied to a 160-ml column which was de- veloped at a flow rate of 4 ml/h. 2-ml fractions were collected. U, ab- sorbance at 280 nm; -, urokinase inhibitor-related antigen; X-X, uro- kinase inhibitory activity. Fractions 34 to 38 were pooled. The column was cali- brated using a mixture of phosporylase b ( M , 94,000), bovine serum albumin ( M , 67,000), ovalbumin ( M , 43,000), and soy- bean trypsin inhibitor ( M , 20,000). The arrows indicate elution positions of the calibration proteins, expressed in kilo- daltons.

0.1

E : 0.1 0

I- a W 0 z a m a

m 0 0.0 <

FRACTION NUMBER

A B

Mr 1 2 3 4 5 Mr 1 2 3 4 5 x x 1 ~ - 3

94 -_ 94- - 67-

67- -- a" 43- -e-

43-

30- & r )

30 - 20 -

A.

20- 4

FIG. 4. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electro- phoresis. A, without reduction; B, after reduction with dithioeryth- ritol. kne I , purified urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex from urine; lane 2, urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex after digestion with 0.5 M hydroxylamine; lane 3, purified urokinase inhibitor from urine; lane 4 , purified urokinase inhibitor obtained by immunoad- sorption of plasma; lane 5, M , 54,000 urokinase. Molecular weight calibration was performed with a standard mixture of phosphorylase b (M, 94,000), bovine serum albumin (M, 67,000), ovalbumin (M, 43,000), carbonic anhydrase ( M . 30,000), and soybean trypsin inhib- itor ( M , 20,000).

FIG. 5. Double immunodiffusion. A, rabbit anti-urokinase IgG; B, rabbit anti-urokinase inhibitor IgG. Spot 1, urokinase inhibitor isolated from plasma by immunoadsorption (Fig. 4, lune 4 ) ; spot 2, urokinase inhibitor purified from urine (Fig. 4, lane 3) ; spot 3, uro- kinase-urokinase inhibitor complex (Fig. 4, lane I ) ; spot 4, M , 54,000 urokinase (Fig. 4, lane 5 ) .

B Mr

A 1 2 3 4 5 x10-3

Mr x

1 2 3 4 5

94' 94-

67'

43-

30

20

cy .. . -

67-

uL1r 43

30,

20-

FIG. 6. Immunoblotting of SDS-PAGE gels transferred to nitrocellulose. A, with rabbit anti-urokinase IgG; B, with rabbit anti-urokinase inhibitor IgG. Lanes, 1-5, see Fig. 4B, lanes 1-5.

yield a precipitin arc (not shown), suggesting that the inhib- itor occurs a t a low concentration in plasma.

The amino acid composition of the urokinase inhibitor is shown in Table 11. Only 0.6 residue of cysteine/100 residues was obtained, as determined both as cysteic acid or as carbox- ymethylcysteine. This suggests that the urokinase inhibitor contains 2 cysteine residues. Significant amounts of amino sugars were recovered, confirming its glycoprotein nature.

One mg of the purified urokinase inhibitor neutralized 35,000 IU of urokinase when incubated for 30 min at 37 "C in the presence of 50 units of heparin/ml. This suggested that only about 1h of the purified material from urine was obtained in functional form. Incubation of 10 nM urokinase with 70 to 280 nM active purified inhibitor (pseudo-first order condi- tions) led to a time and concentration-dependent loss of urokinase activity (Fig. SA) .

From Fig. SA an apparent second order rate constant of 8

12764 Urinary Urokinase Inhibitor

A I

B

FIG. 7. Crossed immunoelectrophoresis. Three-pl samples were applied at the origins (0) and the tracking dye (bromphenol blue) was run to the marker (vertical bars in A and E ) . Rabbit antiserum was added to the gel for electrophoresis in the second dimension. A, purified urinary urokinase inhibitor (0.5 pg) and rabbit antibodies to the urokinase inhibitor; B, total human serum, 4-fold diluted, and rabbit antiserum to total human serum.

TABLE I1 Amino acid composition of the urokinase inhibitor

material" Urinary

material" Plasma Amino acid

Asparatic acid 10 8.6 Threonine 5.2 5.4 Serine 10 10 Glutamic acid 12 11 Proline 4.5 3.9 Glycine 6.6 9.7 Alanine 6.6 7.3 Cysteineb 0.6 ND' Valine 4.7 4.2 Methionine 2.8 2.8 Isoleucine 2.4 2.3 Leucine 11 11 Tyrosine 2.4 3.1 Phenylalanine 5.1 5.2 Histidine 1.7 1.8 Lysine 5.2 5.9 Arginine 5.0 3.5 Tryptophan ND ND Glucosamine 2.7 3.4 Galactosamine 1.3 0.8

"The values represent mean of three determinations and are expressed as number of residues/100 residues of amino acids, not including tryphophan.

* Determined after conversion to cysteic acid or to carboxymethyl- cysteine.

ND, not determined.

X lo7 M" s" was calculated. However, when heparin was added to the reaction mixture a more rapid initial inhibition rate with an apparent second order rate constant of 9 X IO4 M" s" was seen (Fig. 8B). A similar effect of the urokinase inhibitor towards urokinase was observed in a clot lysis system where residual urokinase activity was measured via plasmin-

- 100

50 -

20 -

10 -

5 -

A B

0

" 10 20 30 10 20 30

TIME (min)

FIG. 8. Inhibition of urokinase by the urokinase inhibitor isolated from urine. Urokinase (10 nM) was incubated with bovine serum albumin (1 mg/ml) and purified active urokinase inhibitor (0, 70 nM; 0, 140 nM; X, 280 nM) at 37 "c. A t the times shown, aliquots were removed and diluted %fold with 0.038 M NaC1, 0.04 M Tris. HCl, pH 7.4, containing 0.01% Tween 80 and 0.33 mM S-2444. Residual urokinase activity was determined by measurement of ab- sorbance at 405 nm as compared to controls without added urokinase inhibitor (milliabsorbance units/min = 0.011). A, without heparin; B, with heparin, 50 units/ml. Data points are expressed as percent of control urokinase activity.

ogen activation rather than by its amidolytic activity (not shown). The protease specificity of the urokinase inhibitor was apparent by lack of inhibition of plasmin a t 10-fold molar excess and of single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen acti- vator at 4-fold molar excess of inhibitor. In addition, two- chain t-PA was inhibited 10-fold more slowly than urokinase. However, thrombin was inhibited with an apparent second order rate constant of 4 X lo4 M" s" in the absence of heparin and 2 x lo5 M" s" in the presence of 50 IU/ml of heparin. The urokinase inhibitory activity was stable during freezing and thawing but decreased rapidly over a few days if stored at 4 "C. Urokinase inhibitory activity was stable for over 1 h at pH 4 but was completely destroyed within 5 min at pH 2.5. The inhibitory activity was also destroyed during a 1-h incu- bation in 0.1% SDS.

Isolation of the Urokinase Inhibitor from Human Plasma- When normal human plasma samples were assayed for uro- kinase inhibitor-related antigen by the ELISA calibrated with the urinary protein, a level of 2.0 f 0.73 pg/ml (mean f S.D., n = 25) was found. This antigen was quantitatively removed by immunoadsorption on the insolubilized monoclonal anti- body 10A6A10, a different antibody from those used in the ELISA. When plasma was subjected to two cycles of immu- noadsorption and then to Sephadex G-100 gel filtration, a single polypeptide was isolated. This protein comigrated with the urokinase inhibitor purified from urine on gel filtration (not shown) and on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4, A and B , lanes 4 ) . It was immunologically identical to the purified protein from urine (Fig. 5B, lane I ) and reacted with monospecific IgG against the urokinase inhibitor during immunoblotting (Fig. 6B, lane 4 ) . The amino acid composition of the material isolated from plasma was similar to that of the inhibitor isolated from urine (Table 11). The protein isolated from plasma, however, did not inhibit urokinase, a finding which was also obtained with the urinary material when obtained by immunoadsorption. The urokinase inhibitor concentration in serum was the same as that in plasma.

Urinary Urokinase Inhibitor 12765

Urokinase- Urokinase Inhibitor Complex Formation in Plasma-To determine if urokinase-urokinase inhibitor com- plexes form in human plasma following addition of urokinase, an ELISA specific for the purified complex from human urine was developed. I t was based on the adsorption of urokinase- related antigen to microtiter plates coated with two monoclo- nal antibodies to urokinase, followed by quantitation of bound urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex with a peroxidase- conjugated monoclonal antibody specific for the urokinase inhibitor. Purified urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex could not be measured in undiluted plasma due to high back- ground levels, but, when added to 10-fold diluted plasma, a linear dose response between 2 and 20 ng/ml was obtained (not shown). Thus, the effective sensitivity of this assay for this complex in plasma was 20 ng/ml (or 10 ng/ml of complex- associated urokinase antigen).

No urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complexes could be meas- ured in normal resting plasma. However, when urokinase was added to plasma a t a final concentration of 2 pg/ml, the assay measured time-dependent formation of this complex as shown in Fig. 9. In the absence of heparin the rate of complex formation was relatively slow and incomplete. However, when plasma contained 50 IU/ml heparin, both more rapid and more extensive complex formation occurred, reaching half- maximum levels in about 5 min and maximum levels after 20 to 30 min. Complex formation was not observed when uroki- nase with an active site blocked by the synthetic inhibitor Glu-Gly-Arg-CHPC1 was added to normal plasma, nor when active urokinase was added to plasma depleted of the uroki- nase inhibitor by immunoadsorption on insolubilized mono- clonal antibody 10A6A10. From the initial rates of complex

1 I 1

20 40 60 TIME (min)

FIG. 9. Formation of urokinase-urokinase inhibitor (UK- UK.I) complexes in plasma. Urokinase (2 pg/ml final concentra- tion) was incubated at 37 "C with citrated human plasma in the presence (0) or absence (0) of heparin, 50 IU/ml. At the times shown, samples were removed and added to the synthetic urokinase inhibitor Glu-Gly-Arg-CH,Cl, final concentration lo-' M, then assayed with the ELISA specific for UK-UK.1 complexes. One pg/ml of UK-UK.1 complex contains approximately 0.5 pg/ml each of urokinase-related and urokinase inhibitor-related antigen.

formation measured with enzyme and inhibitor concentra- tions of 40 nM each, second order rate constants of approxi- mately 7 X lo3 M" s" in the absence and 5 X lo4 M" s" in the presence of heparin were calculated.

DISCUSSION

Our previous observation that urokinase is recovered from human urine mainly as a complex with an inhibitor (7) prompted us to purify and characterize this urokinase inhib- itor. First, an immunoassay useful for the monitoring of this inhibitor during purification was developed. Therefore, mice were immunized with the purified urokinase-urokinase inhib- itor complex and hybridomas secreting monoclonal antibodies against epitopes localized in the inhibitor portion of the complex were identified. A rapid and sensitive ELISA for the urokinase inhibitor was developed, using three monoclonal antibodies reacting with three nonoverlapping epitopes in the inhibitor. Although highly purified urokinase inhibitor could be obtained by immunoadsorption chromatography of urine on insolubilized monoclonal antibody, this material was to- tally inactive. Therefore, an alternative purification method was developed which did not require the use of denaturing solvents.

With a concentration of urokinase inhibitor-related antigen in urine of 200 pg/liter, large volumes of urine were required to allow isolation of sufficient amounts of urokinase inhibitor for further characterization. Zinc chelate-Sepharose was cho- sen as the first step because this allows rapid handling of large volumes of urine. Although the extent of adsorption of the inhibitor to this column was only 75%, the 30-fold volume reduction and 10-fold purification were very useful. In the next step chromatography on concanavalin A-Sepharose yielded separation from free urokinase antigen, which passed unbound through the column, and provided further volume reduction and purification. Final purification was then ob- tained with both cation-exchange and gel filtration chroma- tography, yielding homogenous material, 320-fold purified, with a yield of 18% of the original starting material.

The purified urokinase inhibitor is a glycoprotein of appar- ent M , 50,000 with @-globulin mobility on electrophoresis. It is immunologically distinct from all known plasma protease inhibitors, including the fast-acting t-PA inhibitor (ZO), pro- tease nexin (21), or the urokinase inhibitor from human placenta (22). Moreover, it does not react with a broad panel of antisera against known plasma proteins. Therefore, this urokinase inhibitor probably represents a previously unrec- ognized plasma protein. Monospecific antibodies raised to it were reactive with the purified urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex from urine and with its nonreducible M, 50,000 component obtained after digestion with hydroxylamine, con- firming its identity with the protein responsible for the bind- ing of urokinase in urine.

The observation that the bulk of urokinase in urine is recovered as a complex with this urokinase inhibitor (7) is not inconsistent with the recovery of significant amounts of free inhibitor in the present purification method. Indeed, of the total urokinase-related antigen in urine (60 pg/liter), about 75% or 45 pg/liter occurs as urokinase-urokinase inhib- itor complex. Thus, only 20% of the total urokinase inhibitor- related antigen present in urine (200 pg/liter) is complexed with urokinase, leaving the remaining 80% available for pu- rification in the free form. The factors which regulate the formation of the urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex may play a significant role in the regulation of urinary fibrinolysis. The physiological importance of urinary fibrinolysis for the maintenance of both ductal patency and urinary tract hemo-

12766 Urinary Urokinase Inhibitor

stasis, however, remains to be established. Interestingly, the protein was also detected in plasma, where it occurs at a concentration of approximately 2 pg/ml. In addition, with the use of an ELISA specific for urokinase-urokinase inhibitor complex, the time-dependent formation of this complex in plasma was demonstrated following the addition of urokinase in equimolar amounts to the inhibitor. Moreover, the second order rate constants in the presence and absence of heparin measured by the complex-specific ELISA were in good agree- ment with those obtained using the purified urokinase inhib- itor from urine.

Previous studies have only reported very slow inhibition of high concentrations of urokinase by plasma (23,24), although the major plasma proteins a,-antitrypsin (23, 25), antithrom- bin I11 (23, 24, 26), a2-macroglobulin (23, 24, 27, 28), and cy2-

antiplasmin (29,301 all slowly form complexes with urokinase. More recently it has been recognized that very low concentra- tions of urokinase are rapidly inhibited in plasma by a fast- acting inhibitor which neutralizes both urokinase and t-PA (31). Its estimated second order rate constant for urokinase inhibition is 10' M" s", which is at least above that of the urokinase inhibitor described here and still 10' above that observed in the presence of heparin. However, physiological plasma concentrations of the fast-acting t-PA inhibitor are less than 5 ng/ml (32) or more than 400-fold less than that of' the urokinase inhibitor. Thus, although the rate constant of the inhibition of urokinase by this novel inhibitor is small by comparison, it is not inconceivable that at its higher measured concentration it could play a role in the physiological inacti- vation of urokinase in plasma. The potential for such a role is supported by the observation of urokinase-urokinase inhib- itor complex formation in plasma, although in a '251-labeled fibrin plasma clot system we have thus far been unable to detect increased rates of lysis in plasma immunodepleted of this inhibitorP The potential role of the urokinase inhibitor would likely be most pronounced in the microvasculature where cell surface heparin-like substances would stimulate its urokinase inhibitory capacity. The availability of a purifica- tion procedure and a practical immunoassay for this protease inhibitor will facilitate further investigations of its biological function.

Acknowledgments-We acknowledge the skillful technical assist- ance of Eddy Demarsin and Lena Kieckens. We are also grateful for the kind assistance provided by Dr. D. Loskutoff (Scripps Institute, La Jolla, CA), Dr. J. Baker (University of Kansas, Lawrence, KA), Dr. E. Kruithof (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire du Vaudois, Lau- sanne, Switzerland), and Dr. J. Pacques (Behringwerke, Marburg/ Lahn, West Germany) in the immunologic characterization studies.

"" ~~~

D. C. Stump, M. Thienpont, and D. Collen, unpublished obser- vations.

REFERENCES 1. Williams, J . R. B. (1951) Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 32, 530-537 2. Astrup, T., and Sterndorff, I. (1952) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.

3. Sobel, G. W., Mohler, S. R., Jones, N. W., Dowdy, A. B. C., and

4. Plough, J., and Kjeldgaard, N. 0. (1957) Biochim. Biophys. Acta

5. White, W. F., Barlow, G. H., and Mozen, M. M. (1966) Biochem-

6. Husain, S. S., Gurewich, V., and Lipinski, B. (1983) Arch.

7. Stump, D. C., Thienpont, M., and Collen, D. (1986) J. Biol. Chem.

8. Rijken, D. C., and Collen, D. (1981) J . Biol. Chem. 256, 7035-

9. Zamarron, C., Lijnen, H. R., Van Hoef, B., and Collen, D. (1984)

IO. Nakane, P. A., and Kawaoi, A. (1974) J . Histochem. Cytochem.

11. Porath, J., Carlsson, J., Olsson, I., and Belfrage, G. (1975) Nature

12. Hjelm, H., Hjelm, K., and Sjoquist, J. (1972) FEBS Lett. 28,73-

13. Galfri., G., and Milstein, C. (1981) Methods Enzymol. 73, 3-46 14. Darras, V., Thienpont, M., Stump, D. C., and Collen, D. (1986)

15. Wiman, B., and Collen, D. (1977) Eur. J . Biochem. 78, 15-26 16. Ouchterlony, 0. (1958) in Progress in Allergy (Kallos, P., ed) Vol.

17. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 18. Towbin, H., Stacktin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad.

19. Clarke, M. G . H., and Freeman, T. (1968) Clin. Sci. 35,403-409 20. van Mourik, J. A., Lawrence, D. A., and Loskutoff, D. J. (1984)

21. Scott, R. W., and Baker, J. B. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258,10439-

22. Kruithof, E. K. O., Schleuning, W. D., and Vassalli, J. D. (1985)

23. Murano, G., Aronson, D., Williams, L., and Brown, L. (1980)

24. Waller, E. K., Schleuning, W.-D., and Reich, E. (1983) Biochem.

25. Clemmensen, I., and Christensen, F. (1576) Biochim. Biophys.

26. Clemmensen, I. (1978) Thromb. Haemostasis 39 , 616-623 27. Vahtera, E., and Hamberg, U. (1978) Biochem. J. 171, 767-770 28. Ogston, D., Bennet, B., Herbert, R. J., and Douglas, A. S. (1973)

29. Moroi, M., and Aoki, K. N. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251 , 5956-

30. Samama, M., Castel, M., Matsuo, O., Hoylaerts, M., and Lijnen,

31. Kruithof, E. K. O., Tran-Thang, C., Ransijn, A., and Bachmann,

32. Schleef, R. R., Sinha, M., and Loskutoff, D. J. (1985) J . Lab. Clin.

8 1,675-678

Guest, M. M. (1952) Am. J. Physiol. 171 , 768-769

24, 278-769

istry 5, 278-282

Biochem. Bwphys. 220, 31-38

261, 1267-1273

704 1

Thromb. Haemostasis 52,19-23

22,1084-1091

258,598-599

76

Thromb. Haemostasis, in press

5, p. 1, Karger, Basel, Switzerland

Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354

J . Biol. Chem. 259, 14914-14921

10444

Thromb. Haemostasis 54,230 (Abstr. 1360)

Blood 55,430-436

J. 215, 123-131

Acta 429,591-599

Clin. Sci. 44, 73-79

5965

H. R. (1982) Thromb. Haemostasis 47, 36-40

F. (1984) Blood 64,907-913

Med. 106,408-415