11
PUPPETS: talking science, PUPPETS: talking science, engaging science, learning engaging science, learning science science Stuart Naylor Stuart Naylor Nature and Learning Conference Vordingborg, May 2010

PUPPETS: talking science, engaging science, learning science

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

PUPPETS: talking science, engaging science, learning science. Stuart Naylor Nature and Learning Conference Vordingborg, May 2010. Main research objectives. How can puppets promote children’s engagement and talk in primary science lessons? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: PUPPETS: talking science,  engaging science, learning science

PUPPETS: talking science, PUPPETS: talking science, engaging science, learning science engaging science, learning science

Stuart NaylorStuart Naylor

Nature and Learning Conference

Vordingborg, May 2010

Page 2: PUPPETS: talking science,  engaging science, learning science

Main research objectivesMain research objectives

How can puppets promote children’s engagement and talk in primary science lessons?

Can we change teachers’ views about the value of talk and how they manage talk in the classroom?

Page 3: PUPPETS: talking science,  engaging science, learning science

Research design: the main studyResearch design: the main study

The main study involved 16 teachers, teaching children age 7-11 from a range of social and cultural backgrounds.

Teachers were video-taped teaching a typical science lesson without puppets.

Then they were video-taped teaching a science lesson using puppets.

We analysed both lessons.

Page 4: PUPPETS: talking science,  engaging science, learning science

Research design: the main studyResearch design: the main study

We also: videoed small groups talking interviewed the teachers interviewed some of the children had follow up teacher meetings got teachers to keep reflective diaries

Page 5: PUPPETS: talking science,  engaging science, learning science

What did we find out? What did we find out?

Children were more engaged and motivated in science lessons.

More children talked in lessons. The impact was greatest on children who did not talk much usually.

Children used more reasoning - they gave fuller explanations, they explained and justified their ideas.

Page 6: PUPPETS: talking science,  engaging science, learning science

What did we find out?What did we find out?

Teachers used more questions that required thinking and reasoning rather than recall.

They used more argument and gave less information.

They gave more encouragement and spent more time setting the scene.

Page 7: PUPPETS: talking science,  engaging science, learning science

An example of the impact of puppets on An example of the impact of puppets on teachers’ questionsteachers’ questions

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

lesson withoutpuppets

lesson withpuppets

TeacherreasoningquestionsTeacher non-reasoningquestions

The graph shows styles of questions used by the teacher in lessons without and with puppets

Page 8: PUPPETS: talking science,  engaging science, learning science

The origin of the puppets researchThe origin of the puppets research

Concept Cartoons present scenarios with alternative viewpoints that include some common misconceptions.

Puppets provide a way of ‘bringing the Concept Cartoons to life’ so that the misconceptions seem even more authentic.

Page 9: PUPPETS: talking science,  engaging science, learning science
Page 10: PUPPETS: talking science,  engaging science, learning science

Some interesting points and issuesSome interesting points and issues

Puppets present problems, not instructions. This inevitably influences the lesson.

The talk related to scientific questions, not socio-scientific.

Individual worksheets have a negative impact on children’s talk.

A small scale intervention had a big impact on teachers’ professional practice.

Page 11: PUPPETS: talking science,  engaging science, learning science

Websites Websites

You will find our websites at

www.millgatehouse.co.uk

www.puppetsproject.com