Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SANDAG
John Minto, Chair Mayor, City of Santee (Representing East County)
Keith Blackburn, Vice Chair Mayor Pro Tem, City of Carlsbad (Representing North County Coastal)
Chris Ward Councilmember, City of San Diego
Bill Horn Supervisor, County of San Diego
Steve Vaus Mayor, City of Poway (Representing North County Inland)
Alejandra Sotelo-Solis Councilmember, City of National City (Representing South County)
Public Safety
Manuel Rodriguez Chief, National City Police Department (Representing County Chiefs’/ Sheriff’s Association)
Walt Vasquez Chief, La Mesa Police Department (Representing County Chiefs’/ Sheriff’s Association)
Donald Butz Chief, Lakeside Fire Protection District (Representing Regional Fire/ Emergency Medical Services)
Summer Stephan District Attorney, San Diego County (San Diego County District Attorney)
Shelley Zimmerman Chief of Police, City of San Diego (San Diego Police Department)
William D. Gore Sheriff, San Diego County (San Diego County Sheriff)
Advisory Members
Adolfo Gonzales Chief Probation Officer, San Diego County Probation Department (Representing County Public Safety)
Gerral David Director of Operations, Navy Region Southwest (Representing Department of Defense)
Alana W. Robinson Acting United States Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office (Representing Federal Public Safety)
Eric Birnbaum Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (Representing Federal Public Safety)
John Valencia Program Manager, Office of Homeland Security, City of San Diego (Representing Homeland Security)
Jamie Becerra Chief, Transit Enforcement, North County Transit District (Representing Regional Transit)
Robert Smith Representative, Pala (Representing Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association)
Jim Abele Chief, California Highway Patrol (Representing State Public Safety)
Gary L. Gallegos Executive Director, SANDAG
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
AGENDA
Friday, July 21, 2017 1 to 3 p.m.
SANDAG Board Room 401 B Street, 7th Floor
San Diego
AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS • SUBSTANCE USE TRENDS AMONG THE
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ARRESTEE POPULATION
• OVERVIEW OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTYSHERIFF DEPARTMENT’S NALOXONEPROGRAM
• FIXING AMERICA’S SURFACETRANSPORTATION ACT PERFORMANCEMANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS
PLEASE SILENCE ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING
YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEBSITE AT SANDAG.ORG
MISSION STATEMENT The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-
making. SANDAG builds consensus, makes strategic plans, obtains and allocates resources, plans,
engineers, and builds public transit, and provides information on a broad range of topics
pertinent to the region's quality of life.
San Diego Association of Governments ⋅ 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101-4231
(619) 699-1900 ⋅ Fax (619) 699-1905 ⋅ sandag.org
2 Rev. 7/14/2017
Welcome to SANDAG. Members of the public may speak to the Public Safety Committee on any item at the time the Committee is considering the item. Please complete a Speaker’s Slip, which is located in the rear of the room, and then present the slip to the Committee Clerk seated at the front table. Members of the public may address the Committee on any issue under the agenda item entitled Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. The Public Safety Committee may take action on any item appearing on the agenda.
Public comments regarding the agenda can be sent to SANDAG via [email protected]. Please include the agenda item, your name, and your organization. Email comments should be received no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the Public Safety Committee meeting. Any handouts, presentations, or other materials from the public intended for distribution at the Public Safety Committee meeting should be received by the Committee Clerk no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the meeting.
In order to keep the public informed in an efficient manner and facilitate public participation, SANDAG also provides access to all agenda and meeting materials online at sandag.org/meetings. Additionally, interested persons can sign up for e-notifications via our e-distribution list at either the SANDAG website or by sending an email request to [email protected].
SANDAG operates its programs without regard to race, color, and national origin in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. SANDAG has developed procedures for investigating and tracking Title VI complaints and the procedures for filing a complaint are available to the public upon request. Questions concerning SANDAG nondiscrimination obligations or complaint procedures should be directed to SANDAG General Counsel, John Kirk, at (619) 699-1997 or [email protected]. Any person who believes himself or herself or any specific class of persons to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI also may file a written complaint with the Federal Transit Administration.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905.
SANDAG agenda materials can be made available in alternative languages. To make a request call (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Los materiales de la agenda de SANDAG están disponibles en otros idiomas. Para hacer una solicitud, llame al (619) 699-1900 al menos 72 horas antes de la reunión.
如有需要, 我们可以把SANDAG议程材料翻译成其他語言.
请在会议前至少 72 小时打电话 (619) 699-1900 提出请求.
SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 511 or see 511sd.com for route information. Bicycle parking is available in the parking garage of the SANDAG offices.
3
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEEFriday, July 21, 2017
ITEM NO. RECOMMENDATION
+1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES APPROVE
The Public Safety Committee is asked to review and approve the minutes from its May 19, 2017, meeting.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS
Members of the public shall have the opportunity to address the Public SafetyCommittee on any issue within the jurisdiction of the Committee that is noton this agenda. Anyone desiring to speak shall reserve time by completing a“Request to Speak” form and giving it to the Clerk prior to speaking. Publicspeakers should notify the Clerk if they have a handout for distributionto Committee members. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or fewerper person. Committee members also may provide information andannouncements under this agenda item.
REPORTS
+3. REPORT FROM CHIEFS'/SHERIFF'S MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (Chief Manuel Rodriguez, National City Police Department)
INFORMATION
Chief Manuel Rodriguez, National City Police Department, will report on the July 5, 2017, meeting of the Chiefs'/Sheriff's Management Committee.
4. REPORT FROM THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION(Chief Don Butz, Lakeside Fire Protection District)
INFORMATION
Chief Don Butz, Lakeside Fire Protection District, will report on recentmeetings of the San Diego County Fire Chiefs' Association.
5. SUBSTANCE USE TRENDS AMONG THE SAN DIEGO COUNTYARRESTEE POPULATION (Cynthia Burke)
INFORMATION
Staff will present recently compiled data from both juvenile and adult arresteesregarding drug use histories and other risky behaviors.
6. OVERVIEW OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT'SNALOXONE PROGRAM (Captain Todd Richardson, San Diego CountySheriff's Department)
INFORMATION
In 2015, the San Diego County Sheriff's Department became the first lawenforcement agency in California to provide naloxone, which reverses theeffect of opiate overdose, to all patrol deputies. Captain Todd Richardson,San Diego County Sheriff's Department, will provide an overview of thisprogram and lessons learned to date.
4
+7. FIXING AMERICA'S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ACT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS (Rachel Kennedy)
INFORMATION
The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act established performance requirements, including for safety for states and metropolitan planning organizations. Staff will provide an overview of statewide safety performance targets proposed by Caltrans for fatalities and serious injuries.
8. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENT
If the five speaker limit for public comments was exceeded at the beginning of this agenda, other public comments will be taken at this time. Subjects of previous agenda items may not again be addressed under public comment.
9. UPCOMING MEETINGS INFORMATION
The next meeting of the Public Safety Committee is scheduled for Friday, August 18, 2017, at 1 p.m.
10. ADJOURNMENT
+ next to an agenda item indicates an attachment
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17-07-1
JULY 21, 2017 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS
MAY 19, 2017
The meeting of the Public Safety Committee was called to order by Chair John Minto, East County, at 1:02 p.m. See the included attendance sheet for Public Safety Committee member attendance.
1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES (APPROVE)
Action: Upon a motion by Mayor Steve Vaus (North County Inland) and a second by Supervisor Bill Horn (County of San Diego), the Public Safety Committee approved the minutes from its April 21, 2017, meeting. Yes – Chair Minto, Councilmember Jewel Edson (North County Coastal), Councilmember Chris Ward (City of San Diego), Supervisor Horn, Mayor Vaus, Councilmember Alejandra Sotelo-Solis (South County), Chief Investigator Miguel Rosario (San Diego District Attorney), and Executive Assistant Chief Todd Jarvis (San Diego Police Department). No – None. Abstain – None. Absent – County Chiefs’/Sheriff’s Association Seat A and Seat B, Regional Fire/Emergency Medical Services, and San Diego County Sheriff.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
REPORTS
3. REPORT FROM THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS’ ASSOCIATION (INFORMATION)
No report given.
4. SAN DIEGO HARBOR POLICE OVERVIEW (INFORMATION)
Assistant Chief Mark Stainbrook, San Diego Harbor Police, provided an overview of the San Diego Harbor Police Department to include areas of responsibility and intelligence-led policing efforts, which enhance public safety and ensure operational effectiveness and efficiency.
Action: This item was presented for information only.
2
5. AUTOMATED REGIONAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SYSTEM MAPPING DASHBOARD (INFORMATION)
Matt Brown, San Diego Harbor Police, and Katie Mugg, Senior Business Analyst, provided an overview highlighting the benefits of the Regional Mapping Dashboard.
Action: This item was presented for information only.
6. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no continued public comments.
7. UPCOMING MEETINGS (INFORMATION)
The next meeting of the Public Safety Committee is scheduled for Friday, June 16, 2017, at 1 p.m.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Minto adjourned the meeting at 2:01 p.m.
Meeting Start Time: 1:02 p.m. Meeting Adjourned Time: 2:01 p.m.
3
CONFIRMED ATTENDANCE SANDAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING
May 19, 2017
JURISDICTION NAME MEMBER/ ALTERNATE
ATTENDING COMMENTS/ ATTENDED
East County Hon. John Minto, Chair Member Yes
Hon. Steve Goble Alternate No
North County Coastal Hon. Keith Blackburn, Vice Chair Member No
Hon. Jewel Edson Alternate Yes
City of San Diego Hon. Chris Ward Member Yes
Hon. Lorie Zapf Alternate No
County of San Diego Supervisor Bill Horn Member Yes
Supervisor Greg Cox Alternate No
North County Inland Hon. Steve Vaus Member Yes
Hon. Amanda Rigby Alternate Yes
South County Hon. Alejandra Sotelo-Solis Member Yes
Hon. Steve Padilla Alternate No
County Chiefs’/Sheriff’s Association
Chief Manuel Rodriguez Member—Seat A No
Chief Walt Vasquez Member—Seat B No
Chief Craig Carter Alternate—Seat A No
Chief Neil Gallucci Alternate—Seat B No
Regional Fire/Emergency Medical Services
Chief Don Butz Member No
Chief Steve Abbott Alternate No
San Diego County District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis Member No
Chief Miguel Rosario Alternate Yes
San Diego Police Department Chief Shelley Zimmerman Member No
Exec. Assistant Chief Todd Jarvis Alternate Yes
County Sheriff Sheriff William D. Gore Member No
Undersheriff Mark Elvin Alternate No
ADVISORY MEMBERS
County Public Safety Adolfo Gonzales Member No
Rueben Littlejohn Alternate No
Department of Defense Michial Michalovich Member Yes
Gerral David Alternate No
Federal Public Safety
Alana W. Robinson Member No Blair Perez attended
Kathleen Connon 1st Alternate No
Gregory Archambeault 2nd Alternate No
Eric Birnbaum Member Yes
William Sherman 1st Alternate No
Steven C. Stafford 2nd Alternate No
Homeland Security John Valencia Member No
Holly Crawford Alternate No
Regional Transit Services Jaime Becerra Member No
Manuel Guaderrama Alternate No
Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association
Robert H. Smith Member No
Leia Arviso Alternate No
State Public Safety Chief Jim Abele Member No
Assistant Chief Deb Schroder Alternate Yes
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17-07-3 JULY 21, 2017 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION
REPORT FROM CHIEFS’/SHERIFF’S File Number 7350200 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
Chief Manuel Rodriguez, National City Police Department, will report on the July 5, 2017, meeting of the Chiefs’/Sheriff’s Management Committee.
Attachment: 1. Draft Chiefs’/Sheriff’s Management Committee, July 5, 2017, Meeting Minutes
Key Staff Contact: Pam Scanlon, (619) 699-1971, [email protected]
San Diego Association of Governments Attachment 1
CHIEFS’/SHERIFF’S MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
2
August 2, 2017 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 3
Action Requested: INFORMATION
JULY 5, 2017, MEETING MINUTES
Chair Manuel Rodriguez, National City Police Department, could not attend this meeting. Chief Craig Carter, Escondido Police Department, was designated Chair for today’s meeting. The meeting of the Chiefs’/Sheriff’s Management Committee (Management Committee) was called to order by Chief Carter at 9:47 a.m.
1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
Action: Upon a motion by Chief John Bolduc (San Diego Harbor Police Department) and a second by Chief Jeff Davis (El Cajon Police Department), the Management Committee approved the minutes from the April 5, 2017, meeting. Yes – Chief Carter, Chief Neil Gallucci (Carlsbad Police Department), Chief Jon Froomin (Coronado Police Department), Chief Davis, Captain Jose Tellez (National City Police Department), Chief Investigator Miguel Rosario (San Diego District Attorney’s Office), Assistant Sheriff Mike Barnett (San Diego County Sheriff’s Department), Chief Bolduc, and Assistant Chief Charles Kaye (San Diego Police Department). No — None. Abstain — None. Absent — Chula Vista Police Department, La Mesa Police Department, and Oceanside Police Department.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS
There were no public or member comments.
REPORTS
3. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE UPDATE (INFORMATION)
Pam Scanlon, Automated Regional Justice Information System Director, reported on the Public Safety Committee (PSC) meetings held on April 21, 2017, and May 19, 2017. The next scheduled PSC meeting is Friday, July 21, 2017.
Action: This item was presented for information.
4. FY 2018 WORK PLAN PRIORITIES (DISCUSSION/POSSIBLE ACTION)
Director Scanlon and Dale Stockton, Senior Technology Program Analyst, gave an overview of both grant and general fund projects and initiatives.
Action: This item was presented for discussion/possible action.
3
5. SUBSTANCE USE TRENDS AMONG THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ARRESTEE POPULATION (INFORMATION)
Dr. Cynthia Burke, Division Director, Applied Policy Research/Criminal Justice, presented data collected from arrestees regarding their drug use histories and other risky behaviors. The compiled information is from both juveniles and adults through 2016.
Action: This item was presented for information.
6. COPLINK UPDATE (INFORMATION)
Suzanne Sanderman, Associate Technology Program Analyst, presented a COPLINK demonstration and overview. COPLINK is an investigative tool that enables law enforcement information sharing throughout the region.
Action: This item was presented for information.
7. UPDATE FROM THE BUSINESS WORKING GROUP (INFORMATION)
Director Scanlon provided an update on the Business Working Group (BWG). The BWG met on May 30, 2017, at the Carlsbad Police Department. The next BWG meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, August 15, 2017, at the San Diego Sheriff’s Office.
Action: This item was presented for information.
8. UPCOMING MEETING (INFORMATION)
The next meeting of the Management Committee is scheduled for Wednesday, August 2, 2017, at 9:45 a.m. at the Sheraton Four Points, 8110 Aero Drive, San Diego, California 92123.
9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:56 a.m.
Meeting Start Time: 9:47 a.m.
Meeting Adjourned Time: 10:56 a.m.
4
CHIEFS’/SHERIFF’S MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ATTENDANCE FOR JULY 5, 2017
JURISDICTION/ORGANIZATION NAME ATTENDING COMMENTS
Carlsbad Police Department Chief Neil Gallucci Yes
Captain Mickey Williams, Alternate No
Chula Vista Police Department Chief Roxana Kennedy No
Captain Vern Sallee, Alternate No
Coronado Police Department Chief Jon Froomin Yes
Commander Laszlo Waczek, Alternate No
El Cajon Police Department Chief Jeff Davis Yes
Captain Mike Moulton, Alternate No
Escondido Police Department Chief Craig Carter Yes
Captain Mike Loarie, Alternate No
La Mesa Police Department Chief Walt Vasquez Yes
Absent at the time of voting.
Captain Ray Sweeney, Alternate No
National City Police Department Chief Manuel Rodriguez, Chair No
Captain Jose Tellez, Alternate Yes
Oceanside Police Department Chief Frank McCoy No
Captain Tom Aguigui, Alternate No
San Diego District Attorney Chief Investigator Miguel Rosario Yes
Assistant Chief Investigator Joe Cargel No
San Diego County Sheriff’s Department
Sheriff William D. Gore No
Assistant Sheriff Mike Barnett, Alternate Yes
Commander Larry Nesbit, Second Alternate No
San Diego Harbor Police Department
Chief John Bolduc Yes
Assistant Chief Mark Stainbrook, Alternate No
San Diego Police Department Assistant Chief Charles Kaye Yes
Vacant, Alternate N/A
ARJIS Pam Scanlon, ARJIS Director Yes
SANDAG Cynthia Burke,
Applied Policy Research/ Criminal Justice Division Director
Yes
OTHER ATTENDEES SANDAG/ARJIS STAFF MEMBERS LISTED BELOW
Barbara Jean Harris, ARJIS Suzanne Sanderman, ARJIS Dale Stockton, ARJIS Julie Wiley, SANDAG
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17-07-7
JULY 21, 2017 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION
FIXING AMERICA’S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ACT File Number 3102000 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS
Introduction
Federal law requires that SANDAG prepare a long-range transportation plan every four years. The current plan, San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan) was adopted by the SANDAG Board of Directors in October 2015, and SANDAG currently is beginning work on updating this plan for adoption in 2019. The federal Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), which was signed into law in 2012, included provisions for the establishment of a new performance and outcome-based program, which includes national performance goals for the federal-aid highway program in seven areas: safety, infrastructure condition, congestion reduction, system reliability, freight movement and economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and reduced project delivery delays. Signed into law on December 5, 2015, the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act continues MAP-21’s overall performance management approach and establishes nationally consistent metrics. The U.S. Department of Transportation has issued several rules that established a set of performance measures. These rules require states and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) such as SANDAG to establish targets for each of the performance measures, which would be reported in the next Regional Plan update. States’ ability to meet their performance measure targets, could affect the types of projects that funds must be allocated to in the future.
This report provides an overview of the performance management rules and focuses on the safety performance measures, which include fatalities and serious injuries, and the target setting process. Caltrans has led a multi-agency effort, including the Federal Highway Administration, National Highway Traffic Association, California Highway Patrol, California Office of Traffic Safety, MPOs, and other stakeholders, to develop draft statewide performance targets. SANDAG, as the MPO, is required to establish regional performance targets and will be seeking input from the SANDAG working groups and Public Advisory Committee members during this process.
Discussion
Three rules related to performance management have been issued to date. The Performance Management 1 (PM 1) rule includes five metrics regarding fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, which are described in the next section. The Performance Management 2 (PM 2) rule focuses on pavement condition and bridge condition. The Performance Management 3 (PM 3) rule includes
2
performance measures focusing on reliable travel for people and freight, travel delay, mode share, and emissions reductions1.
Performance Management 1: Safety Performance Measures
The Safety Performance Management Measure final rule became effective on April 14, 2016. This rule establishes five performance measures to carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)2 and requires data reporting of the five-year rolling averages for: (1) number of fatalities, (2) rate of fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT), (3) number of serious injuries, (4) rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT, and (5) number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries. The safety performance measures are applicable to all public roads regardless of ownership or functional classification.
Performance Management 1 - Target Setting
Caltrans is required to establish statewide targets for each of the safety performance measures. Targets will be established by August 31, 2017, and updated annually. The first reporting on the targets will occur in August 2017 as part of the California HSIP annual report. States have the option of setting separate targets for urbanized areas and for rural areas. Caltrans has been coordinating with MPOs on the establishment of the state targets for more than a year. On June 22, 2017, Caltrans shared its proposed state targets, which call for a reduction in fatalities and serious injuries that reflect aspirational goals of “toward zero deaths.” SANDAG staff will be evaluating the fatality and serious injury data for San Diego County and will discuss target options with the working groups and SANDAG Public Safety and Transportation Committees this fall.
SANDAG, as the MPO, is required to establish regional targets by February 27, 2018 (within 180 days after Caltrans establishes the statewide targets). MPOs can either select the same target as the state target or develop a target specific to the MPO. The SANDAG targets will be reported to the state and will be part of a new performance report included in the Regional Plan.
A state is considered to have met or made significant progress toward meeting its safety targets when at least four of the five targets are met, or the outcome for the performance measures is better than the baseline performance the year prior to the target year. Each year that Federal Highway Administration determines that a state has not met or made significant progress toward meeting its performance targets, the state will be required to obligate HSIP funding equal to the baseline year HSIP apportionment, only for safety capital projects. Caltrans awards HSIP funds to local jurisdictions to construct a wide array of safety improvement projects to correct or improve a hazardous road feature or to address a highway safety problem, including intersection safety, shoulder widening, traffic calming, and bicycle/pedestrian safety. Attachment 1 provides additional information on PM 1.
1 PM 2 and PM 3 became effective on May 20, 2017, Caltrans and SANDAG staffs will be coordinating on the
statewide target setting process
2 The HSIP is a core federal-aid program with the purpose to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities
and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-state-owned roads and roads on tribal land. The HSIP
consists of three main components, the Strategic Highway Safety Plan, State HSIP or program of highway safety
improvement projects, and the Railway-Highway Crossing Program.
3
Next Steps
SANDAG staff will analyze San Diego County fatality and serious injury data and discuss target options with the working groups and the Public Safety and Transportation Committees this fall. Coordination with Caltrans on PM 2 and PM 3 is anticipated to start in August 2017. Staff will coordinate with the Public Safety Committee regarding future work on PM 1 including safety target setting, data collection, and reporting.
CHARLES “MUGGS” STOLL Director of Land Use and Transportation Planning
Attachment: 1. Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet Key Staff Contact: Rachel Kennedy, (619)699-1929, [email protected]
Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet
Safety Performance Measures Number of Fatalities: The total number of persons suffering fatal injuries in a motor vehicle crash during a calendar year. Rate of Fatalities: The ratio of total number of fatalities to the number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT, in 100 Million VMT) in a calendar year. Number of Serious Injuries: The total number of persons suffering at least one serious injury in a motor vehicle crash during a calendar year. Rate of Serious Injuries: The ratio of total number of serious injuries to the number of VMT (in 100 Million VMT) in a calendar year. Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Non-motorized Serious Injuries: The combined total number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries involving a motor vehicle during a calendar year.
Data SourcesFatality Data: Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). Final FARS data is to be used if it is available, otherwise FARS Annual Report File (ARF) data may be used, which is generally available one year before Final FARS data.
Volume Data: State VMT data is derived from the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS). Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) VMT, if applicable, is estimated by the MPO.
Serious Injury Data: State motor vehicle crash database. Agencies must use the definition for “Suspected Serious Injury (A)” from the MMUCC, 4th edition by April 15, 2019. Prior to April 15, 2019 agencies may use injuries classified as “A” on the KABCO scale through use of serious injury conversion tables. However, agencies are encouraged to begin using the MMUCC, 4th edition definition and attributes at the beginning of 2019 for a complete and consistent data file for the calendar year.
Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Non-motorized Serious Injuries: FARS and State motor vehicle crash database. The number of non-motorized fatalities is the total number of fatalities with the FARS person attribute codes: (5) Pedestrian, (6) Bicyclist, (7) OtherCyclist, and (8) Person on PersonalConveyance. The number of non-motorized serious injuries is the totalnumber of serious injuries where theinjured person is, or is equivalent to, apedestrian (2.2.36) or a pedalcyclist(2.2.39) as defined in ANSI D16.1-2007.
What You Need to Know About Establishing Targets States: • States will first establish statewide targets in their August 31, 2017 HSIP Annual Report for calendar year 2018, and annually
thereafter.• Targets are applicable to all public roads regardless of functional classification or ownership.• For common performance measures (number of fatalities, rate of fatalities and number of serious injuries), targets must be
identical to the targets established for the NHTSA Highway Safety Grants program in the Highway Safety Plan.• States also have the option to establish any number of urbanized area targets and one non-urbanized area target for any or all of
the measures. If a State chooses to do so, it is required to report the urbanized area boundaries used and evaluate and reportprogress for each target. Urbanized and non-urbanized area targets are not included in the significant progress determination.
Coordination and Collaboration: • Performance management connects the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and Highway Safety Plan (HSP) to the
Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) to promote a coordinated relationship for common performance measures, resulting incomprehensive transportation and safety planning.
• The State DOT and MPOs in the State must coordinate when establishing targets, to the maximum extent practicable.• A wide range of stakeholders should work together to establish targets. This includes, the State DOT, State Highway Safety Office,
MPOs, FHWA Division Office, NHTSA Regional Office, Law Enforcement Agencies and EMS (include all 4 E’s of Highway Safety)• Set targets that are data-driven and realistic, maintain momentum and remain focused.
Five Performance Measures
Number of Fatalities
Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million VMT
Number of Serious Injuries
Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT
Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Non-motorized Serious Injuries
4FHWA-SA-16-044
Attachment 1
What You Need to Know About Establishing Targets (continued) MPOs: • MPOs must establish targets specific to the MPO planning area for the same five safety performance measures for all public roads
in the MPO planning area within 180 days after the State establishes each target. MPOs may select one of the following options foreach individual safety performance measure:
• agreeing to support the State target; OR• establishing specific numeric targets for a safety performance measure (number or rate).
• MPOs that choose to establish a rate target must report the VMT estimate used to establish that target and the methodology todevelop the VMT estimate. MPOs should make maximum use of data prepared for HPMS when preparing the rate-based targetdenominator. If an MPO develops data specifically for the denominator, it should use methods to compute VMT that are consistentwith those used for other Federal reporting purposes.
• MPO targets are reported to the State DOT, and made available to FHWA, upon request. MPO targets are not included in theassessment of whether a State has met or made significant progress toward meeting its targets.
Performance Measure State Target MPO Target
For Each Performance Measure, Support State Target or Establish
MPO-Specific Target Target Reported in HSIP Annual Report for FHWA
Target Reported in Highway Safety Plan for NHTSA
Number of Fatalities =
Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million VMT =
Number of Serious Injuries =
Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT Not required Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Non-motorized Serious Injuries Not required
Example Target Calculations 5-Year Rolling Average: Each target is based on a 5-year rolling average, which is the average of 5 individual, consecutive points of data.The 5-year rolling average provides a better understanding of the overall data over time without eliminating years with significantincreases or decreases; and provides a mechanism for accounting for regression to the mean. If a particularly high or low number offatalities and/or serious injuries occur in one year, a return to a level consistent with the average in the previous year may occur.
The number targets are calculated by adding the number for the measure for each of the most recent 5 consecutive years ending in the year for which the targets are established, dividing by 5, and rounding to the tenth decimal place. The rate targets are calculated similarly yet rounded to the thousandth decimal place. This more accurately reveals the change from one 5-year average to another that might otherwise be obscured if the number was truncated.
Example: Number of Fatalities Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Number of Fatalities 471 468 493 468 462* *From FARS Annual Report File, if Final FARS is not availableTo determine the target for number of fatalities:• Add the number of fatalities for the most recent 5
consecutive calendar years ending in the year for which thetargets are established: 471 + 468 + 493 + 468 + 462 = 2,362
• Divide by five and round to the nearest tenth decimal place:2,362 / 5 = 472.4
Example: Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million VMT Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Number of Fatalities 471 468 493 468 462* Per 100 Million VMT 454.21 487.50 466.48 492.27 495.97
Rate of Fatalities 1.04 0.96 1.06 0.95 0.93 *From FARS Annual Report File, if Final FARS is not availableTo determine the target for rate of fatalities:
• Add the rate of fatalities for the most recent 5 consecutivecalendar years ending in the year for which the targets areestablished: 1.04 + 0.96 + 1.06 + 0.95 + 0.93 = 4.94
• Divide by five and round to the nearest thousandth decimalplace: 4.94 / 5 = 0.988
5FHWA-SA-16-044
3/26/2018
1
1
Background
• Funded by National Institute of Justice since 1987
• Solely supported with local funds since 2004
• Interviews with adults and juveniles booked into local detention facilities
• Urinalysis identifies recent drug use
• Platform for other research
• Key data for variety of stakeholders
2
3/26/2018
2
Overview
• Drug use among arrestees up
• Meth remains drug of choice
• Changing detention populations and different patterns of use by gender, age, and race
• Legalization of marijuana related to public safety concerns
• Multi‐faceted strategies needed to address factors related to recidivism
• Measures related to synthetic drug use moved in desired direction the past year
3
#1: Most Adult Arrestees Positive for At Least One Drug
64%
75%
66%
74%
46%44%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Males Females Juveniles
Percent Positive Any Drug
4
3/26/2018
3
How Have Positive Drug Rates Changed Since Realignment?
AB 109 Realignment
Oct 2011
Prop 47Nov 2014
Prop 64Nov 2016
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Males 59% 58% 63% 71% 68% 76% 75%
Females 62% 63% 65% 69% 69% 69% 74%
5
Percent Positive Any Drug
#2: Meth Use Increasing
28%
54%
29%
48%
11% 14%
0%
20%
40%
60%
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Males Females Juveniles
6
Percent Positive Meth
3/26/2018
4
No Difference in Meth Use by Ethnicity for Adults in 2016
48%54%
24%
53%
30%
57%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012 2016
White Black Hispanic
Percent Positive Meth
7
Frequent Meth Use Common Among Adult Arrestees
66%
79%
21%
26%
54%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Marijuana Meth Crack Cocaine Heroin
% Who Tried Drug Who Used in Last Year
16
18
7
3
18
0
5
10
15
20
Marijuana Meth Crack Cocaine Heroin
Average # of DaysUsed in Past
30 Days
8
3/26/2018
5
#3: Marijuana Use Down for Adult Males and Juveniles, but Up for Females
38%
44%
27%
36%
42%
35%
20%
40%
60%
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Males Females Juveniles
9
Percent Positive Marijuana
Only 1 in 4 Juveniles Perceive Marijuana as Potentially Harmful to Users
100%
95%
95%
94%
94%
83%
81%
76%
65%
44%
25%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Heroin
Meth
Inhalants
Crack
Cocaine
Ecstasy
LSD
Mushrooms
Tobacco
Alcohol
Marijuana
10
Percent that Think Drug is “Very Bad” or “Bad”
3/26/2018
6
Pre‐Prop 64: Marijuana Baselines
• 68%: Potency has increased since use began
• 63%: Have dabbed
• 61%: Have driven under the influence
– 47%: Think use impairs driving
• 56%: Think it is psychologically addicting
• 25%: Have ever had a medical card
• 0%: Have been to the emergency room for use
11
#4: Percent Positive for Opiates Up Over Time
6%
9%
7%
15%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Males Females
12
Percent Positive Opiates
3/26/2018
7
Younger Arrestees More Likely to Have Used Heroin in Past Year
32%
71%
39%
63%
30%27%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Ever tried heroin Used heroin past year
Under 25 25‐39 40 and Older
13
Younger Arrestees Now More Likely to Test Positive for Opiates
4%
15%
8%
12%
8%
6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
2007 2016
Under 25 25‐39 40 and Older
Percent Positive Opiates
14
3/26/2018
8
1 in 3 used prescription opiates before heroin
4 in 5 of these started using heroin as a substitute
15
Types of Prescription Opiates Used Before Heroin by Age
Under 25
25‐39 40 & Older
OxyContin 50% 89% 38%
Vicodin 30% 43% 46%
Dilaudid 0% 18% 31%
Fentanyl 0% 14% 15%
Percocet 20% 43% 46%
Demerol 0% 4% 15%
#5: Gang Prevention and Intervention Key Parts of Regional Crime Prevention
• 37% of juveniles and 27% of adults report some type of gang involvement
• Associated with increased access to guns, involvement in drug distribution, and drug use
• 10% of juveniles and 4% of adults participated in a gang prevention program
16
3/26/2018
9
Information About Involvement from Members and Associates
76% think they will leave the gang
someday, but 68% don’t want to now
60% say family in gang
58% joined because friends in gang
55% say gang has official meetings
41% have worked with other gangs to make money
39% report their gang has female
leaders
16% have been approached by someone to get
out
12% moved from one area to
another because of law enforcement
17
#6: About 1 in 5 had Felony Reduced to Misdemeanor Under Prop 47
• 33% currently booked for highest offense that was drug‐related, 26% other, 23% property, and 17% violent
• 54% said they have committed crime to support drug habit
• 36% wouldn’t complete treatment if not mandated
• 31% have a full‐ or part‐time job
18
3/26/2018
10
#7: Homelessness and Housing Key Issues
2016:
Ever homeless‐65%
Current homeless‐29%
2007:
Ever homeless‐50%
Current homeless‐12%
19
Homeless Arrestees Booked for Similar Charges to Those Not Homeless
17%
26%
37%
33%
21% 20%
26%
22%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Homeless Not Homeless
Violent Drug Property Other
Most Serious Booking Charge
20
3/26/2018
11
More Arrestees in Each Group Report Being Currently Homeless
6%
21%
9%
25%
21%
41%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
2007 2016
Under 25 25‐39 40 & Over
Percent Currently Homeless
21
Criminal Histories & Mental Health Status of Arrestees Currently Homeless
91% 91%
34% 35%36%
45%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2007 2016
Ever Jail Ever Prison Mental Health Diagnosis
22
3/26/2018
12
#8: Spice Indicators Show Some Positive Change in 2016 for Juveniles
48%
77%
83%
27%
93%
45%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Ever tried spice Spice "very bad" or "bad" Alternative to marijuana
2015 2016
23
2016 Products
• Juvenile aggregate data and Bulletin published June 2017
• June CJ Flash on gender differences for juveniles
• Adult aggregate data and Bulletin planned for August 2017
• Gang CJ in Brief and Meth CJ in Brief September 2017
• Additional topical CJ Flashes in coming months
24
3/26/2018
13
25
3/26/2018
1
1
Sheriff’s Naloxone Project
Captain Todd Richardson
San Diego County Sheriff's Department
Naloxone Project
2
3/26/2018
2
3
AB 635 & the 9-1-1 Good Samaritan LawAB 635 passed in 2013 allows distribution of naloxone to friends, and family of those at risk via a prescription from a doctor.
1. Other person who can assist 2. First responders can also administer the drug3. Requires training
The California Good Samaritan Law, passed in 2012 offers legal protection for users who take reasonable actions.
The law does NOT protect from:
• Outstanding warrants• Probation or parole violations• Drug dealing (scales, baggies, cash, etc.)• Crimes other than drug possession (like weapons possession or if
you are driving drunk or high)
4
Naloxone Project
In 2014, the Sheriff’s Department partnered with UC San Diego for a comprehensive study of the pilot project, Dr. David Peterson and Dr. Karla Wagner helped develop training for the Sheriff’s Naloxone Project. A 6-month pilot project was conducted in the Sheriff’s Santee Command (Santee, Lakeside and unincorporated El Cajon, with a population of about 150,000).
UC San Diego and Dr. Bruce Haynes, the San Diego County Medical Director of Emergency Medical Services, provided medical oversight for the patrol deputies. Scripps Health and the McCallisterGroup also partnered and contributed to the project.
Unique to the Sheriff’s Department is our staff, Dr. Alfred Joshua, the Sheriff's Chief Medical Director, issued the medical prescription for deputies to carry and administer Naloxone.
3/26/2018
3
5
Naloxone Project
Current cost is about $70.00 per dose.
6
3/26/2018
4
7
Naloxone Project
Following the success of the 2014 Naloxone pilot project, the Sheriff’s Department implemented a department-wide Naloxone program.
Naloxone is now carried by all law enforcement deputies, including most investigative units, all Courts Services field units, and Sheriff’s detention facilities staff. In addition, Sheriff’s dispatchers are trained and can assist the public with life-saving instructions on how to administer Naloxone.
Naloxone administered from 1-1-2014 to 5-31-2017:
Year No Death Death Total
2014 14 1 15
2015 11 2 13
2016 13 4 17
2017 7 2 9
Grand Total 45 9 54
8
Naloxone Project
DISCUSSION
3/26/2018
1
Public Safety Committee
July 21, 2017
1
Background
San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan
MAP‐21/FAST Act
Transportation performance management
Safety metrics
2
3/26/2018
2
Performance Management (PM) Rules
Performance Management 1: Fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads
Performance Management 2: Pavement condition and bridge condition
Performance Management 3: Reliable travel, congestion and delay, mode share, and emissions reduction
3
PM 1: Safety Performance Measures
Number of fatalities
Rate of fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled
Number of serious injuries
Rate of serious injuries per 100 million vehicle miles traveled
Number of non‐motorized fatalities and non‐motorized serious injuries
4
3/26/2018
3
Target Setting Process
Caltrans is required to establish statewide targets by August 31, 2017
Multi‐agency coordination
“Toward Zero Deaths” aspirational targets
SANDAG is required to set targets by February 27, 2018
Option to support the statewide targets or set regional targets
5
2018 Draft Statewide Safety Target: Number of Fatalities
• 7.69% year‐to‐year decrease in the number of fatalities
Source: Caltrans June 2017
2018 Draft Target: 3,590.8
6
3/26/2018
4
2018 Draft Statewide Safety Target: Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
• 7.69% year‐to‐year decrease in the number of fatalities• 2% annual increase in vehicle miles traveled
Source: Caltrans June 2017
2018 Draft Target: 1.029
7
2018 Draft Statewide Safety Target: Number of Serious Injuries
• 1.5% year‐to‐year reduction in serious injuries
Source: Caltrans June 2017
2018 Draft Target: 12,823.4
8
3/26/2018
5
2018 Draft Statewide Safety Target: Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled
Source: Caltrans June 2017
2018 Draft Target: 3.831
• 1.5% year‐to‐year decrease in the number of serious injuries• 2% annual increase in vehicle miles traveled
9
2018 Draft Statewide Safety Target: Number of Non‐Motorized Fatalities & Serious Injuries
• 10% per year reduction in fatalities and serious injuries from 2017‐2020
Source: Caltrans June 2017
2018 Draft Target: 4,271.1
10
3/26/2018
6
Next Steps
August 2017: Caltrans finalizes state targets for PM1
August 2017: Caltrans begins coordination with SANDAG on statewide targets for PM2 and PM3
Continued collaboration on regional target setting with SANDAG Working Groups, Policy Committees, Board; and Caltrans and FHWA
February 27, 2018: SANDAG establishes targets for PM1
11
