Upload
joachim-von-braun
View
1.304
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
October 19-20, 2005, FICCI Federation House, Tansen Marg, New Delhi, India
Citation preview
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Public-Private
Partnerships for
Harnessing the Potential of
Rainfed Agriculture
Joachim von Braun
International Food Policy Research Institute
October 19-20, 2005, FICCI
Federation House, Tansen
Marg, New Delhi, India
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 2
Outline
PPP in agriculture: The main options and issues
Less favored/marginal rainfed areas: risks and opportunities
Possibility of PPPs in the supply chain management of high value and processed commodities
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 3
Agri-food systems are increasingly …
• Driven by market forces / consumers/ retail
• Globalized through international trade
• Influenced by new technologies
• Subject to stricter regulatory scrutiny
• Subject to greater ethical scrutiny
But peoples’ ability to respond to this changing context differs greatly between regions, nations and communities
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 4
Opportunities for partnership exist
Partnerships can improve access to
• New technologies, and tools
• New research expertise and infrastructure
• Private equity markets; donor funding
• New product markets and new customers
• New marketing and distribution networks
Synergies through knowledge sharing,
joint learning, scale economies, resource
pooling, and cost sharing
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 5
But roles remain contested
With changes in the global agri-food system,
the roles of the state, industry, and civil
society remain contested
Controversy over ownership of new knowledge
Issues over distribution of benefits and risks
Concerns over lack of pro-poor emphasis
Unease over environmental, social sustainability
Learning from others? e.g. the health and ICT sectors
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 6
Yet our visions and goals often coincide
a world free of hunger and malnutrition
To provide solutions that cut hunger and
malnutrition
These goals are
good on humanitarian grounds
and good for business
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 7
Real actions follow common interests
Private Public
Private support
to charitable
public projects
Public projects Private
provision of
public goods
Public
Commercial
projects Private
Planning,
Financing
Delivery,
Execution Civil Society
Civil Society
Private support
to charitable
NGO projects
NGO provision
of public goods
NGO
partnership
projects
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 8
Outline
PPP in agriculture: The main options and issues
Less favored/marginal rainfed areas: risks and opportunities
Possibility of PPPs in the supply chain management of high value and processed commodities
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 9
What are “less-favored areas” (LFAs)?
Include areas with
• low agricultural potential, due to limited rainfall, poor
soils, steep slopes, etc. (biophysical constraints); or
• limited access to infrastructure (e.g., roads and
irrigation) and markets (socioeconomic constraints)
Some LFAs are found in:
• semi-arid and arid tropics of Asia and Africa
• mountain areas of Asia, Latin America and Africa
• hillside areas in Central America and Asia
• forest margins of humid and sub-humid tropics of
Africa, Latin America and Asia
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 10
Acc
ess t
o in
frastr
uctu
re an
d m
arke
ts
Socioeconomic constraints.Biophysical constraints.
a
b
High
CLASSIFICATION OF FAVORED AND
LESS-FAVORED AREAS
Lowa
bHigh Low
Favoredareas
Less-favoredareas
Less-favoredareas
Less-favoredareas
Agricultural potential
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 11
Why be concerned about LFAs?
1. Most of the poor live depend on these areas for their livelihoods:
• Over 1 billion people live in such areas
• Problems of low agricultural productivity, poverty, and natural resource degradation severe and worsening in many such areas
• Problems in these areas give rise to conflict, emigration to other areas, negative environmental consequences
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 12
Drought and famine risks…
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 13
Droughts from 1900-2004
# of Events Killed Affected
Africa 460 1,046,500 315,238,600
Americas 100 100 61,701,400
Asia 200 7,761,400 1,789,441,000
Europe 30 1,200,000 15,262,600
Oceania 25 700 8,233,600
EM-DAT: The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database, Université
catholique de Louvain
Droughts are the deadliest natural
events…
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 14
Droughts involve significant
economic costs…
Economic losses due to drought in Eastern India
Averaged over 30
years
During drought years
only
Loss of rice production (million tons) 2.6 7.6
Value of rice production loss
($million)
250 735
Value of other crop production loss
($million)
125 370
Employment loss (million person-
days)
160 480
Value of employment loss ($ million) 160 480
Total economic losses ($million) 535 1,585
Source:www.agric.uwa.edu.au/ARE/AARES/Conf2003/ClimateWorkshop/PandeyPresent.ppt
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 15
Why be concerned about LFAs?
2. Contrary to general belief, returns
to investments are often higher in
these areas …
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 16
Returns to Investments in India – Impacts on
Agricultural Production (Fan and Hazell 1999)
Investment Units
Irrigated
areas
High
potential
rainfed
areas
Low
potential
rainfed
areas
HYV’s Rps/ha 63 243 688
Roads Rps/km 100,598 6,451 136,173
Canal
irrigation
Rps/ha 938 3,310 1,434
Private
irrigation
Rps/ha 1,000 -2,213 4,559
Electrification Rps/ha -546 96 1,274
Education Rps/ha -360 571 902
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 17
Returns to Investments in India – Impacts on Poverty
Reduction (Fan and Hazell 1999)
Investment Units
Irrigated
areas
High
potential
rainfed
areas
Low
potential
rainfed
areas
HYV’s Persons/ha 0.00 0.02 0.05
Roads Persons/km 1.57 3.50 9.51
Canal
irrigation
Persons/ha 0.01 0.23 0.09
Private
irrigation
Persons/ha 0.01 -0.15 0.30
Electrification Persons/ha 0.01 0.07 0.10
Education Persons/ha 0.01 0.23 0.01
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 18
Returns to Investments in China – Impacts on Rural GDP
(Fan, et al. 2004a) (yuan/yuan inv.)
InvestmentCoastal Central Western
R&D 5.54 6.63 10.19
Irrigation 1.62 1.11 2.13
Roads 8.34 6.90 3.39
Education 11.98 8.72 4.76
Electricity 3.78 2.82 1.63
Telephone 4.09 4.60 3.81
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 19
Outline
PPP in agriculture: The main options and issues
Less favored/marginal rainfed areas: risks and opportunities
Possibility of PPPs in the supply chain management of high value and processed commodities
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 20
Opportunities for PPPs along the
supply chain…
PRODUCERS
PROCESSORS
MARKETERS
RETAILERS
CONSUMERS
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 21
High value production on dry lands
1. Public Private Partnerships in
Research and Development for
varietal adaptation to climatic
extremes
TECHNOLOGY
SHARING + RESOURCE
MOBILIZATION
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 22
ICRISAT Experience in India- Sorghum and
Pearl millet Hybrid Parents Research Consortia
Initiated in 2000
Impact:
• Increased adoption of improved hybrids:
More than 4 million ha of rainy season Sorghum
and 1 million ha summer season sorghum are
planted with 50 private-sector (PS) based hybrids,
of which 40 are based on ICRISAT derived parental
lines
4.5 million ha of pearl millet area is planted with
more than 70 PS based hybrids, of which 60 are
based on ICRISAT derived parental lines
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 23
ICRISAT Experience in PPP for R&D in
India (ctd)
• Resource mobilization
From 2000-2003, members of consortia
included 16 PS Sorghum companies and 18 for
Pearl millet = mobilization of US$ 405,000
April 2004, an additional 25 PS seed
companies members of consortia = US$ 2
million for ICRISAT funding over a five-year
period
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 24
High value production on dry lands
2. Partnership in water management
in rainfed agriculture
• Enhanced water use efficiency
• Increased financing for system
rehabilitation, improvement and
upgrading
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 25
Watershed management projects in
rainfed areas- India
Objectives :
• on-site soil and water conservation
measures that improve the resource base
for rainfed agricultural production.
Increase productivity in rain-fed
agriculture & Provide
opportunities for planting high-
yielding varieties
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 26
Watershed management projects in
rainfed areas- India (ctd)
Methods:
• Emphasis on participatory management &
knowledge sharing
Collaboration b/w Government, NGOs, village
self-help groups (community-based PPPs)
Local people = full partners- Participation in
helping plan, implementing and paying for
watershed development programs
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 27
3. Infrastructure development- roads
and information and
communication technologies
High value production on dry lands
IMPROVE ACCESS
TO MARKETS AND
INFORMATION
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 28
Public Sector will still be the major
player (e.g. provision of initial capital)
Partnerships w/ NGOs, CBOs and
private sector necessary in:
Choosing infrastructure projects that would yield
the highest short run and long run benefits
Cost- sharing (esp. for maintenance )
PPPs in infrastructure development