Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPTO DEVELOP
PERSONAL AND HOUSEHOLD SERVICES
23rd ESN CONFERENCE - LISBOA
PERSONAL AND HOUSEHOLD SERVICES (PHS)
TWO MAIN BRANCHES:- CARE ACTIVITIES (dependant & diseabled people)- NON CARE ACTIVITIES (cleaning, ironing, gardening,…)
TWO DIFFERENT POLICIES AND INTERESTS FOR PUBLIC AUTHORITHIES:- SOCIAL (ACCESS)- EMPLOYMENT (JOB CREATION & FIGHT AGAINST BLACK ECONOMY)
QUESTION : ONE OR TWO SECTORS ?
OTHER REASONS FOR A PUBLIC INTERVENTION- EXTERNALITIES
Autonomy of elderly peopleChild care and female labour market participationBetter work life balance
THE FRENCH EXAMPLE (I)
OR
IN FRANCE, PHS = ONE SECTOR
THE CENTRAL ELEMENT IS THE PRICE.THE PRICE = 90 % COSTS OF LABOUR.THE REFERENCE PRICE = THE BLACK MARKET PRICE (except for rich people)
FOR AN « UNIVERSAL ACCESS », 0 < PRICE < BLACK MARKET PRICETHE DIFFERENCE (between cost of production and the price) IS PAID BY PUBLIC AUTHORITIES.THE NET COST >>> 0
FOR « NON CARE ACTIVITIES », PRICE = BLACK MARKET PRICETHE DIFFERENCE IS PAID BY PUBLIC AUTHORITIES.THE NET COST can be = 0
THE « PUBLIC » HAS A CENTRAL ROLE TO PLAY POSSIBILITY FOR A « PARTNERSHIP » = FINANCIAL SUPPORT
THE FRENCH EXAMPLE (II)
WHICH FORM FOR THIS PPP ?
TWO MAIN POSSIBILITIES:- A SUPPORT TO THE SUPPLY- A SUPPORT TO THE DEMAND.
TWO MAIN HISTORICAL TRENDS:- CARE = SUPPLY SIDE APPROACH- NON CARE = DEMAND SIDE APPROACH
SUPPLY SIDE APPROACH
- « PUBLIC » AS PRODUCERMonopolyRole of public authorities ?A decrease in Europe
- GRANTS TO NON-PROFIT ORGANISATIONSOligopolyPNPPStable or light decreaseConcept of Social services of general interest
DEMAND SIDE APPROACH
- SUPPORT GIVEN TO THE CUSTOMER OR BENEFICIARYSeveral instruments (tax deduction, vouchers, financial supports,…)Opening to profit enterprisesCompetition & « market »An increaseAdditional roles for public authorities (quality control, professionnalisation, training….)
MIX APPROACH
Examples of public instruments for non-care activities
THE FRENCH SITUATION (III)
23 DIFFERENT SITUATIONS IN TERMS OF FISCALITY, SOCIAL SECURITY AND SUPPORTFUNCTION OF KIND OF PRODUCERS AND ACTIVITIES
SUPPLY
DEMAND
COMMON
ADDITIONAL ROLE FOR THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES
- QUALITY CONTROL ( access to the job, standards, rating ,…)
- PROFESSIONNALISATION (training, working conditions,…)
- NEEDS OF REGULATION :- NEW TECHNOLOGIES (robots,…)- NEW ACTORS (new platforms for cleaning services)
THE « PUBLIC » GIVES MONEY BUT ALSO FIXES THE RULES
IMPORTANT CHALLENGES
DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS IN MS
LACK OF ASSESSMENTS
BAD UNDERSTANDING OF COSTS AND RETURNS
BUT POSSIBILITIES TO USE THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND FOR INNOVATIVE APPROACHES
INTEREST FOR SHARING INFORMATION & EXPERIENCES
