Upload
godwin-phelps
View
229
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Public Finance (MPA405)
Dr. Khurrum S. Mughal
Lecture 16: Government Subsidies and Income Support for the Poor
Public Finance
Economic Analysis of the Effects of Government Transfers
• Effect on Resource allocation• Consumer may consume where MSB is less
that MSC• Loss of willingness to work if after work
income is less• Analysis highlights the equity-
efficiency trade-off
Price Distorting Subsidies
• Price Distorting Subsidies lower the price of the particular good relative to others for eligible people.
Price Distorting Subsidies
• Example of Housing subsidy– Hiring apartment at below the market rent– Govt pays the difference
• Subsidized Mortgage loans
A Price Distorting SubsidyE
xpen
dit
ure
on
Oth
er G
oo
ds
per
Mo
nth
(D
oll
ars)
Housing Services per Month 0 L' H1 H2 H3
N3 N1 N2
S
I
B A
L
E1 E3
U2 U3 U1
E2
Subsidy
Price Distorting Subsidies
• Implications:– Induces to purchase a larger amount of housing
that he/she would normally do– Higher level of utility in presence of cash grant
equal to the subsidy– Spending on other goods can also be increased– Dead weight loss
• Difference between E2 and E3
Price Distorting Subsidies and Market Effects
• Example of Housing Market• Operates on constant cost• Long run supply curve is perfectly elastic• Government agrees to pay half the rent
Excess Burden of a Subsidy: Market Effects
B E
Q1
F
A
E’S’
D = MSB
400
200
Number of Apartments Rented
Q20
C
Ren
t (D
oll
ars
per
Mo
nth
)
S = MSC
Excess Burden of Subsidy
Dead Weight Loss or
Excess Burden
• Dead Weight Loss (sometimes called Excess Burden ) is the measure of the dollar value of the distortion that exceeds the amount transferred to the recipient.
Implications• Induces low-income people to increase
their consumption – increased demand• More resources are allocated for
building more houses– But value exceeds the benefits
• Important to compare costs to tax payers and the benefits accruing to low income tenants
Implications• Cost of Subsidy to tax payers
– $200 multiplied by increase in apartments rented after subsidy Area BAE`C
Excess Burden of a Subsidy: Market Effects
B E
Q1
F
A
E’S’
D = MSB
400
200
Number of Apartments Rented
Q20
C
Ren
t (D
oll
ars
per
Mo
nth
)
S = MSC
Excess Burden of Subsidy
Implications• Benefits to Low Income Tenants
– Those who would rent one bedroom apartment even without the subsidy.
• $200 multiplied by Q1 (Area BEFC)
– Those who would rent after the subsidy. Net benefit would be the difference between MB they assign to housing and $200 (Area EE`F)
Excess Burden of a Subsidy: Market Effects
B E
Q1
F
A
E’S’
D = MSB
400
200
Number of Apartments Rented
Q20
C
Ren
t (D
oll
ars
per
Mo
nth
)
S = MSC
Excess Burden of Subsidy
Implications• Total Benefit: Area BEFC + EE`F• Total Cost: Area BAE`C
• So the cost is greater than the benefit and there is excess burden
Price Distorting Subsidies that Lowers the Price to Zero
• Medicaid – Largest program of assistance to Poor in USA
• Reduced the cost of medical services to “zero”• Assuming annual quantity of medical care
consumed can be measured by number of hospital visits
• Supplied by perfectly competitive industry• MSC doesn’t increase when more is made
available
Full Subsidization of Medical Services
Medical Office Visits per Year0 Q*
E1
QG
25 = P*
E2
MBL
B
A
Pri
ce (
Do
llar
s p
er M
on
th)
Excess Burden
Implications
• Increase in Consumer Surplus• Part of increase is already what would have
been acquired anyway• Excess burden is the due to subsidy in kind• Medicaid recipients would be better off with
cash subsidy
Additional Effects of Subsidies: The Case of Increasing Costs
• Medicaid not only costs taxpayers money to pay for the program, it also increases the amount they pay for medical services by increasing demand for those services.
The Impact of The Medicaid Program on Price: The Case of Increasing Cost
Pri
ce
(D
olla
rs)
Medical Office Visits per Year
0 QI O
Q'
E1
QL
140
Q2 QG QO
E2
100
S = MSC
DO DM = MSB
DL
D' M
Implications
• Increase in Prices of Medical Services• Tax payers finance the program• Tax payers face the higher medical service
prices for themselves• Overall decrease in real incomes of tax
payers• Losses in efficiency as well as changes in
income distribution
Subsidizing Housing
• Providing an Apartment: This subsidy allocates a standard apartment to an eligible recipient. With this type of subsidy the recipient cannot supplement the subsidy with their cash. It is a “take it or leave it” option.
• Housing Vouchers: This subsidy allows the recipient a particular allotment of vouchers to rent housing but the recipient may supplement the subsidy with their cash.
• Cash: This subsidy is not restricted to spending on housing.
Public Housing
• Government constructed low cost housing for low income families
• Rented at well below market rates• Public Housing are expected to increase recipient's
housing consumption• Might reduce housing consumption due to lack of
freedom of choice• Suppose Government offers housing at $30 per
room where the rent for 3 bedroom apartment is 90 $– The same goes for rent in the market for $300
Eligibility for Public Housing and the Effect on Housing Consumption
Ex
pe
nd
itu
re o
n O
the
r G
oo
ds
pe
r M
on
th (
Do
llars
)
Housing per Month (Number of Rooms Rented) 0
800 = I
M
H
400= F J
B A
210
210
4
E1
U1 U2 U3
I'
1 3 2 5 6 7
90 G
E2
Refusing a Public-Housing SubsidyE
xp
en
dit
ure
on
Oth
er
Go
od
s p
er
Mo
nth
(D
olla
rs)
Housing per Month (Number of Rooms Rented)0
U3
E1 U2
I
M G
J
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Subsidizing Food
• Food Stamps are the subsidy that allows the recipient a particular allotment of vouchers to buy food but the recipient may supplement the subsidy with their cash. It is illegal to sell the food stamps though it may be in the recipients interests for them to do so.
The Impact of an In-Kind Transfer: Food Stamps
0
B
B
I
A
U2
U1
A'
M1
QF1
L
U3
QF
Ex
pe
nd
itu
re o
n O
the
r G
oo
ds
pe
r M
on
th (
Do
llars
)
0 QF
A
B
I
A
U2
U1
A'
M2
M1
QF1 QF2
Food per Month
C
Q* 1
F
QF2
E1
E1
CE2
E1
The Impact of Government Assistance Programs on Work
• Transfers could cause people to work more or less depending on whether leisure is a normal good.
International Food Subsidies
• Several nations use a price-reducing subsidy to make food more affordable.– Programs that reduce the price of food benefit
higher-income people as well.
• Some nations only subsidize food that is typically consumed by the poor.
• Some nations distribute food directly.
The Income Effect of a Transfer
Inco
me
per
Day
Leisure Hours per Day
0 L1 24
F
C
A
L2
D
U3
U2 U1
E1 E2
E3
G
TransferPayment
A Transfer that Declines with Earned Incomee.g. T=$300-.7IE
L* 24 L2 L1
MaximumDaily
Transfer
Leisure Hours per Day
Inco
me
per
Day
U2
U1
A
D
B
C E1
E2
Empirical Evidence
• A 10% increase in welfare payments to individuals decreases work effort by 2%.
A Negative Income Tax • A Negative Income Tax is a system where there is no
status test but there is an income guarantee and a take-back rate.
• T = IG – tNIE
Where• IG = Income guarantee• tN = take back rate• IE = earned income• T = Transfer
Break-Even Income
0 = IG – tNIB
IB = IG/tN
Negative Income TaxEarned Income IE Transfer T = IG – tNIE Disposable Income ID
0 5,000 5,000
1,000 5,000 – (.5 × 1000) = 4,500 5,500
2,000 5,000 – (.5 × 2000) = 4,000 6,000
3,000 5,000 – (.5 × 3000) = 3,500 6,500
4,000 5,000 – (.5 × 4000) = 3,000 7,000
5,000 5,000 – (.5 × 5000) = 2,500 7,500
6,000 5,000 – (.5 × 6000) = 2,000 8,000
7,000 5,000 – (.5 × 7000) = 1,500 8,500
8,000 5,000 – (.5 × 8000) = 1,000 9,000
9,000 5,000 – (.5 × 9000) = 500 9,500
10,000 5,000 – (.5 × 10000) = 0 10,000
Wage Rate Subsidies
• Wage Rate Subsidies are government additions to wages designed to increase the pay of the working poor.
Wage Rate Subsidies
Wage Paid Subsidy per Hour
Total Wage Received
$2.00 $1.50 $3.50
$2.50 $1.25 $3.75
$3.00 $1.00 $4.00
$3.50 $0.75 $4.25
$4.00 $0.50 $4.50
$4.50 $0.25 $4.75
$5.00 $0.00 $5.00