35
PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP 3711 South Mopac Expressway Building One, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746 P: 512-472-8021 F: 512-320-5638 [email protected] Vince Viaille, Managing Director Specialized Public Finance Inc. 4925 Greenville Avenue, Suite 465 Dallas, Texas 75206 P: 214-373-3911 F: 214-373-

PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES

92nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference

September 30, 2014Lubbock, Texas

Presented By:

Tom Pollan, PartnerBickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP3711 South Mopac ExpresswayBuilding One, Suite 300Austin, Texas 78746P: 512-472-8021 F: [email protected]

Vince Viaille, Managing Director Specialized Public Finance Inc.4925 Greenville Avenue, Suite 465Dallas, Texas 75206P: 214-373-3911 F: 214-373-3913

[email protected]

Page 2: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

OBJECTIVES

Provide a brief overview of the key issues related to Public Finance Aspects for Texas counties

Page 3: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

BEGINNING THE PROCESS

Factors to Consider:◦Project to be Financed◦Size of Issue Needed◦Overall Debt Management Plan◦County’s Ability to Repay◦Future Debt Plans

Page 4: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

WHO TO CONTACT

“Your Team”

Financial Advisor

Bond Counsel

They have a fiduciary duty to the County

Page 5: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

PROFESSIONALS INVOLVED IN THE DEBT ISSUANCE PROCESS

Financial AdvisorBond CounselUnderwriter/PurchaserPaying AgentRating AgenciesBond Insurer/Credit Enhancement

CompaniesAttorney GeneralArchitect/Engineer

Page 6: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

COUNTY’S FINANCIAL ADVISOR

The professional who will: ◦guide the county through the economic

side of the issuance process◦structure the form of the financing and

recommend the type of issue to be used – G.O. Bonds, CO’s, Anticipation Notes, etc.

◦conduct the competitive sale or negotiated sale or arrange for a private placement for funding

◦assist with County’s CIP Process

Page 7: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

COUNTY’S BOND COUNSEL

◦ The county’s lawyer in the transaction who will prepare the financing documents

◦ Provides the “Bond Opinion” which opines that the obligations were properly issued and if issued on a tax exempt basis, that the obligations are not subject to federal insurance taxation

◦ Must know local government law, federal tax law and securities law

◦ An Attorney-Client relationship must exist between the county and the county’s bond counsel

◦ The county has the right to select its own bond counsel

◦ Investors/purchasers require a legal and a tax opinion

Page 8: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

BOND OPINIONS

Bond Counsel will give a market opinion and a tax opinion that:◦County has complied with the law◦If issued as a tax exempt obligation,

interest on the bonds is excludable from gross income of purchaser for purposes of federal income taxation

◦Bonds are not private activity bonds

Page 9: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

HOW ARE THE PROFESSIONALS PAID?

Financial Advisor and Bond Counsel work on a contingent basis◦They are only paid if the bonds are

issued and proceeds are delivered to the county

Architects and other professionals generally do not work on a contingent basis◦They expect to be paid even if the

bond issue does not pass

Page 10: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

PROTECT YOURSELF

Should you use a reimbursement resolution?

Limit the amount owed to Architect and others if bond issue fails

Build limits into contract

Use a government friendly contract

Do not simply sign all preprinted contracts

WHEN DO YOU NEED MONEY?

Page 11: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

WHO WILL BUY?Underwriters

◦Then sells to customers/investors

Local Banks

United States Department of Agriculture’s Rural Development/Rural Utilities Service

Texas Water Development Board

Page 12: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

SALE OF DEBT OBLIGATIONS

Competitive Sale

Negotiated Sale

Private Placement

Page 13: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

BOND RATINGSInvestment Grate Rating Designations of the Major Rating

AgenciesMoody’s Investors

Service, Inc.

Standard & Poor’s

Corporation

Fitch Investors Service, Inc.

Definition

Aaa AAA AAA Highest rating assigned. Very strong security.

Aa AA AA Very Strong security. Only slightly below best rating.

A A A Average security but more subject to adverse financial and economic developments.

Baa BBB BBB Adequate capacity to secure debt. Adverse developments may affect ability to meet debt services requirements.

Note: Moody’s uses the designation “1”, “2”, or “3” to indicate greater strength within the “Baa”, “A”, and “Aa” categories with “1” being strongest. Standard & Poor’s and Fitch use “+” and “-” to indicate relative strength or weakness in the “BBB”, “A”, and “AA” categories.

Page 14: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

FINANCING METHODSGeneral Obligation BondsRevenue BondsCertificates of ObligationContractual ObligationsAnticipation Notes (Tax Notes)Time WarrantsLease-Purchase Contracts

Page 15: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDSAre often referred to as “G.O. Bonds”Require an electionAre backed by a pledge of ad valorem

taxesAre best suited for major capital projects

where the commissioners court believes that it is important to have the voters pass upon the project

May be amortized over a 40 year period, but usually a shorter period of 15 to 20 years is used

Page 16: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

REVENUE BONDSAre secured by a pledge of revenues from

a projectThey are not subject to a demand for

payment from taxesUsually they involve revenues from a

public utilityPrimarily used by cities and special

districtsFew counties have projects that have

sufficient revenues to pledge for payment of bonds

Page 17: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATIONAre often referred to as “Certificates” or

“C.O.’s”Streamlined method of financing Require publicationDo not require an election unless 5% of

the registered voters petitionSecured by ad valorem taxes, a revenue

pledge or combination thereofMay be amortized over a 40 year period,

but usually a shorter period is used

Page 18: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

ANTICIPATION NOTESAny lawful purpose

Examples:◦construction of a public work◦purchase of materials, supplies,

equipment, machinery, buildings, lands, and rights-of-way

◦professional services such as engineers, architects, attorneys and financial advisors

◦operating expenses◦Fund issuer’s cumulative cash flow deficit

Page 19: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

ANTICIPATION NOTESMaximum term is 7 years for capital

expenditures such as construction, equipment, professional services and 1 year for operating expenses and funding cash flow deficit

Requires recommendation of county auditor or from chief budget officer if no auditor

May be secured by a pledge of taxes or revenues, or both

Most counties do not have a sufficient level of revenues to pledge so a pledge of taxes is usually made

No election requiredNo newspaper publication required

Page 20: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

For Personal Property Only ◦Equipment

Secured by ad valorem taxes or revenue

No election requiredMaximum term – 25 yearsCompetitive with lease financing

Page 21: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

TIME WARRANTSOlder method of finance.

Authorized under Chapter 262 of the Texas Local Government Code

Time warrants are subject to publication requirements and are subject to voter petition which may require an election

Page 22: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

TIME WARRANTSDisadvantages:

◦Time Warrants are non-negotiable instruments

◦Time Warrants may not be sold for cash

◦Consequently, arrangements must be made with a vendor to accept the time warrant and a bank to buy the time warrant from the vendor

Page 23: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

TIME WARRANTSDisadvantages:

◦Time warrants often are prepared locally. As a consequence, there may not be all the formalities taken to ensure that the time warrant is a tax-exempt obligation. The rates charged may be higher than

market for a tax-exempt security The time warrant may be for beyond one

fiscal year, and the formality of an interest and sinking fund may not be established. This will render the time warrant invalid.

Page 24: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT/ INSTALLMENT SALES CONTRACT

Permits the county to purchase goods over period of time

Is not a pledge of taxes◦Unless for equipment and properly

structuredIs a maintenance and operations

expense, not a debt service expense unless properly structured

Attorney General approval is not required

Page 25: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT/ INSTALLMENT SALES CONTRACT

Must be subject to annual appropriations (unless structured under the Public Property Finance Act)

No requirement to continue

Practical limits on the ability to discontinue

Interest rates are often higher than a tax pledge obligation

Page 26: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

REFUNDING BONDSUsed to refinance the county’s

outstanding bonds and other obligations

Allows county to take advantage of lower interest rates

Used to restructure debt paymentsNo newspaper publication requirementNo election requirement

Page 27: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

BONDS AND OTHER DEBT INSTRUMENTS ARE SECURITIES

Bonds are exempt from

certain securities laws Bonds are

subject to the anti-fraud

provisions of the securities

laws

Page 28: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

OFFICIAL STATEMENTA document or documents prepared by or on

behalf of the issuer of municipal securities in connection with a primary offering that discloses material information on the offering of such securities

Investors may use this information to evaluate the credit quality of the securities

Although functionally equivalent to the prospectus used in connection with registered securities, an official statement for municipal securities is exempt from the prospectus requirements of the Securities Act of 1933

Page 29: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

29

CONTINUING DISCLOSURERequirement to provide financial

information at least annually Requirement to report certain

events within 10 daysSet out in bond order or separate

agreement Private placement may be

exempt

Page 30: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD

To promote better disclosure MSRB has established the Electronic Municipal Market Access System – “EMMA”◦Who must comply

Service is free

Filings must be made electronically

www.emma.msrb.org

Page 31: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

FEDERAL INCOME TAX ISSUES FOR MUNICIPAL

BONDS

31

Page 32: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

The County’s Duties do not end when the Bonds are Issued

You MUST comply with requirements you promised in the bond documents that you would not let the bonds become taxable

What may cause the problem – TURNOVERThe personnel that were there when the

bonds were issued have departed before the bonds are paid off

You need to familiarize yourself with the requirements so that you can brief your successors

Page 33: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

GENERAL TAX CONVENANTSNo private activity useWill not permit the bonds to become private

activity bondsNo federal guarantyWill restrict the use of the proceeds to

comply with the arbitrage requirementsIn the event of arbitrage will rebate the

excess earning to the United StatesWill maintain the necessary records to permit

the compliance with the tax exempt requirements for at least six years after the final principal and interest payment on the bonds

Page 34: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

ARBITRAGE

The practice of using bond proceeds to acquire higher yielding investments than the rate the government is paying on the bonds

NO ARBITRAGE OF FEDERAL TAX CERTIFICATE

REBATESMALL ISSUER EXCEPTION – Under

$5,000,000

Page 35: PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner

IRS AUDITSEnforcement officials have targeted what

they view as an abusive use of the municipal bond exemptions

The focus is on arbitrage driven transactions where the bond proceeds are invested in higher-yielding instruments

The agency has generally sought to settle such tax disputes with agreements in which the feds recoup any profits from the unauthorized investment, but they have threatened to go after bondholders if they cannot resolve the case otherwise