Public Comments during the Linn County EMA Commission's Public Hearing on the Annual Budget - February 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Public Comments during the Linn County EMA Commission's Public Hearing on the Annual Budget - February 2012

    1/2

    Linn County EMA Commission MeetingFebruary 2012, Public Hearing, Budget

    Submitted by: Richard Struve Jr, citizen

    Upon reviewing the annual budget as prepared by Finance and Budget, there is an organizationalchart on page 10, which clearly shows that, the citizens of Linn County are the party that all ofthe subsequent agencies and departments are accountable to. This public hearing, and its input,should be weighed on that concept being in mind.

    In Januarys EMA Commission meeting, the Director mentioned the purchase of an SUV foraround $36,000. And one of the justifications to have this was for towing. In December 2011smeeting, there was effort to explain and shine the contributions of the HAZMAT Team, andwithin that came the efforts of towing trailers and other needed items. The justification ofcapital purchases is being re-used, and would bring a conclusion that any more than onejustification for something would be a false statement. And as mentioned in January 2012smeeting, placing false information on public record is a felony under 721.1 of the Iowa code. Thisdoes open the door for further review. A justification for something can not be used one month,then used again later to justify the same effort.

    More recently the County Auditor explained the IRS rule on non-essential vehicles, and the factthat these vehicles deemed non-essential are not authorized to be taken home without a chargebeing applied. The fact that the IRS, and the agencys role, is not that of a first response typeservice should dictate that the vehicles are not taken home at all. As a tax payer, it is not onlyunethical, improper, and a huge expense, but in these times of cost savings and huge governmentdebt. Efforts should be made to refrain from non-essential costs. And having the tax payerbasically lease fully gassed vehicles to government employees should not be enabled, for anyagency. The wear and tear, in addition to the gas, are costs that the employee should cover, not atax payer, or in this case, the entity at the top of the organizational structure. The tax payers arebasically the stockholders here, and do have a voice.

    A consideration for two mid sized cars, minimal marking, no lights or radios, should beconsidered in place of a gas guzzling SUV. The efficient cars would be a better fit for the dailyoperations given the new radio system (use of handhelds) and no lights given the agency is not aprimary first response agency. A $50 dash light could also be used for added marking. The olderstaff cars, including the current SUV, could be held for when those needs could arise. Typically, a10-15 minute delay, or even 30 minutes, in the arrival of EMA staff is not going to change thesituation. Also, given a higher than average number of staff, volunteers in the area, HAZMATsupport and its SUV, along with the Sheriffs dispatcher, most situations are covered.

    An aspect of Emergency Management is prepare. During the flood of 2008, a database wasmade of people calling in, volunteering their resources, including trucks. Many of the agencysvolunteers also have SUVs and trucks and can tow in time of need. Furthermore, most cities have

    utility vehicles which can tow an item, in which they need, instead of EMA executing that task ormaintaining a vehicle to do that, when it is rarely needed. Or, as a last resort, rent one for a shortperiod. The ICS training that was done a few years back also alluded that, EMA is more of acoordination entity, and not one that is doing the actual work. This would also further explainwhy the state went to the head title of coordinator for that position, though Linn County haselected to deviate from that standard.

  • 8/2/2019 Public Comments during the Linn County EMA Commission's Public Hearing on the Annual Budget - February 2012

    2/2

    Recently when the salaries of some county officials were reported including the justification forthem. It was revealed that a comparison theme was done with other agencies in the state. Usingthat same justification technique, and looking at the resourcefulness of other EMA operations,one could claim that Linn County is resource rich, which lessens the justification for elaboratevehicles to execute daily functions. And given a good majority of the county is made up of

    incorporated areas, it further lessens the need for SUV type vehicles. Most people that areemployed decide whether or not they need their own SUV type vehicle to drive to work, based onwhere they live, and, the importance of them getting to work in adverse situations.It is up to thestaff to decide where they live, and what they drive to maintain employment, not the tax payer.

    Again looking at other agencies and how resourceful they are, we can look at the HAZMATTeam again, and mirror the efforts of the volunteer base as other agencies have done. Some haveutilized Amateur Radio clubs, which would be a perfect group to go out and check weather radiosand alert systems. Given the radio group is affiliated with the agency, this would be a good fit,and considering the group is also used as a key severe weather reporting entity, which isempowered and entrusted to call in reports which can cause the entire community to shut down,costing millions of dollars. I think the simple task of checking a battery in a radio would be

    within their scope.

    Another resource which could be used is the CERT members (which are utilized in othercounties) that were trained by EMA staff. Funding to train these individuals was done bydiverting funds initially requested by another proven, organized, and lifesaving CERT group inthe area. So it would make sense to use the efforts of these individuals so that the divertedfunding that was not provided to the lifesaving group does not go wasted. This recent CERTgroup is yet another volunteer source which can be utilized as in other counties across the state.Knowing that there are union concerns, some of the activities would not encroach on in-officestaff duties. It would mirror duties that have already been deemed acceptable, like on theHAZMAT Team, doing towing and other tasks, and not conflicting with union parameters.

    In conclusion, in the interest of submitting an approved budget given the timeline. I would askthat my input, acting as a citizen at the top of the organizational structure, be strongly consideredin this meeting, so they do not have to be duplicated at the County Board meeting. With potentialcost cutting measures on the horizon, as indicated by KCRG below, it is crucial that the costsaving measures be adopted as a parameter of the budget.In addition to a timeline being put inplace for those actions being completed and accountability for its completion. The need to savorresources, like vehicles, becomes more imperative when financial uncertainty looms. They needto be reserved for business, not transportation to and from work. And efficiencies within the worksetting be reviewed, and allow other resources to be utilized where they can, which also fallswithin the scope and directives of the Iowa Code and the role of EMA.

    Rich Struve Jr.

    Cedar Rapids, Ia, Linn County.

    http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/Iowa-Poll-Suggests-Support-for-Property-Tax-Cuts-139689093.html

    http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/Iowa-Poll-Suggests-Support-for-Property-Tax-Cuts-139689093.htmlhttp://www.kcrg.com/news/local/Iowa-Poll-Suggests-Support-for-Property-Tax-Cuts-139689093.htmlhttp://www.kcrg.com/news/local/Iowa-Poll-Suggests-Support-for-Property-Tax-Cuts-139689093.htmlhttp://www.kcrg.com/news/local/Iowa-Poll-Suggests-Support-for-Property-Tax-Cuts-139689093.html