Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
STANDARD INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN (CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY STANDARD)
CIS XX : 2020
QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM - FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WORKS (UPON COMPLETION)
Descriptors : Quality of workmanship, structural, architectural, mechanical and electrical, external works, benchmark, site inspection, field testing, sampling
© Copyright
LEMBAGA PEMBANGUNAN INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN MALAYSIA
Construction Industry Development Board of Malaysia LEMBAGA PEMBANGUNAN INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN MALAYSIA
Ibu Pejabat CIDB, Tingkat 10, No 45, Menara Dato’Onn, Pusat Dagangan Dunia Putra, Jalan Tun Razak 50480 Kuala Lumpur. Tel:603-40477000 Faks:603-40477020 http://www.cidb.gov.my
PUBLIC COMMENT 20 January – 20 Februari 2020
Quality Assessment System For Building Construction Works (upon completion)
Quality Assessment System For Building Construction Works (upon completion)
© Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia 2020
All enquiries regarding this book should be forwarded to: Chief Executive Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia Level 10, Menara Dato’ Onn Pusat Dagangan Dunia Putra No 45, Jalan Tun Ismail 50480 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Tel : 603-4047 7000 Fax : 603-4047 7070 Email : [email protected]
Website : www.cidb.gov.my No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, whether mechanical or electronic including photocopying and recording without the written consent of CIDB. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
List of tables iii
Committee representation iv
Preface v
SECTION 1: GENERAL
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Scope 1
1.3 Normative references 2
1.4 Terms and Definition 2
1.5 Abbreviations 3
1.6 Objectives 3
1.7 Assessment components and elements 3
SECTION 2: ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
2.1 Architectural Works 4
2.1.1 Internal Finishes-Floor 4
2.1.2 Internal Finishes-Internal wall 6
2.1.3 Internal Finishes-Ceiling 9
2.1.4 Internal Finishes-Door 10
2.1.5 Internal Finishes-Window 11
2.1.6 Internal Finishes-Internal Fixtures 13
2.1.7 Basic M&E Fittings 14
2.1.8 External Finishes-Roof 18
2.1.9 External Finishes-External Wall 19
2.1.10 External Finishes-Apron & Perimeter Drain 21
2.1.11 External Finishes-Car Park/Car Porch 22
2.2 External Works 22
2.2.1 Link Way (including shelter) 23
2.2.2 External drain 23
2.2.3 Roadworks (including parking bay) 25
2.2.4 Footpath & Turfing 26
2.2.5 Playground 27
2.2.6 Court (sports) 28
2.2.7 Fence and Gate 29
2.2.8 Swimming Pool 30
Acknowledgement 31
iii
LIST OF TABLES Page
Table 1 : Type of floor finishes 4
Table 2 : The assessment criteria for floor 6
Table 3 : Type of internal wall finishes 6
Table 4 : The assessment criteria for internal wall 7
Table 5 : Type of ceiling finishes 9
Table 6 : The assessment criteria for ceiling 9
Table 7 : Type of door finishes 10
Table 8 : The assessment criteria for door 10
Table 9 : Type of windows finishes 11
Table 10 : The assessment criteria for window 12
Table 11 : Type of internal fixtures finishes 13
Table 12 : The assessment criteria for internal fixtures 13
Table 13 : Type of basic M&E fittings finishes 14
Table 14 : The assessment criteria for basic M&E fittings (plumbing) 14
Table 15 : The assessment criteria for basic M&E fittings (M&E fittings) 17
Table 16 : Type of roof finishes 18
Table 17 : The assessment criteria for roof 18
Table 18 : Type of external wall finishes 19
Table 19 : The assessment criteria for external wall 20
Table 20 : The assessment criteria for apron & perimeter drain 21
Table 21 : The assessment criteria for car park/ car porch 22
Table 22 : The assessment criteria for link way (including shelter) 23
Table 23 : The assessment criteria for external drain 24
Table 24 : The assessment criteria for roadworks (including parking bay) 25
Table 25 : The assessment criteria for footpath & turfing 26
Table 26 : The assessment criteria for playground 27
Table 27 : The assessment criteria for court (sports) 28
Table 28 : The assessment criteria for fence & gate 29
Table 29 : The assessment criteria for swimming pool 30
iv
COMMITTEE REPRESENTATION
The Construction Industry Standard (CIS) was developed and reviewed by the Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia with the assistance of the Technical Committee on QCIS 7, which comprises representatives from the following organisations:
Association of Consulting Engineers Malaysia (ACEM)
Chartered Association of Building Engineers (CABE)
Construction Research Institute of Malaysia (CREAM)
International Islamic University of Malaysia (IIUM)
Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia (JKR)
Jabatan Perumahan Negara (JPN)
Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan (KPKT)
Master Builders Association Malaysia (MBAM)
National House Buyers Association (HBA)
Pertubuhan Akitek Malaysia (PAM)
Real Estate & Housing Developer’s Association (REHDA)
v
PREFACE
QLASSIC was developed in 2006 as CIS 7:2006. This standard known as CIS 7:2019, was first revised in 2014 and the second revision was carried out in 2019. CIS 7:2019 is an improved and updated version of the CIS 7:2014 standard. The revision was carried out by a Technical Committee formed by CIDB, whose members were represented by the industry stakeholders. The major changes in this standard are:
1. Requirements on Quality Standard and Assessment for Structural Works and M&E works (except Basic M&E Fittings) as per section 2.1, 3.4 and 3.6 in CIS7:2014 has been excluded.
2. Requirements on Assessment for Architectural works and External Works as per section 3.5 and 3.7 in CIS7:2014 has also been excluded and compiled separately in the Quality Assessment Guideline.
3. Only Quality Standard for Architectural Works, External Works and Basic M&E Fittings as per section 2.1 in CIS7:2014 remains in this updated version.
4. The format for the requirements on Quality Standard as per section 2.1 has been modified. The updated version clearly stated the requirements on the Quality Standard according to specific defect group.
The use of this CIS 7:2019 is voluntary and compliance with this document does not in itself confer immunity from legal and contractual obligations.
1
QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WORKS (UPON COMPLETION)
SECTION 1: GENERAL 1.1 Introduction
This standard on Quality Assessment System for Building Construction Works (upon completion) was
developed by the CIDB in conjunction with major public sector agencies and various leading industry
professional bodies, organisation and firms to measure the quality level achieved in a completed project.
The use of the requirement in this standard is intended to complement the normal contractual drawings
and specification in a project. It is not intended to be used independently as a working specification.
Unless specified in the construction contract, the qualified person should not use the requirement in this
standard to decide if the building or parts of the building project are in accordance with the relevant by-
laws. It is still the responsibility and liability of the qualified person to ensure that the quality of the
construction works conforms to the approved standards, practices, specifications and drawings, as
specified in the construction contract.
1.2 Scope
This standard only sets out the workmanship quality of general building works of architectural works and
external works. Architectural and external works are assessed at or close to the completion of project
prior to handover to the building owner.
Assessments are carried out based on the workmanship standards specified in CIS 7 and marks are
awarded for the works that are comply with the standard. Assessments are measured primarily on the
quality of workmanship and the quality of design. Material used are not assessed and not covered in
CIS 7.
The assessment consists of two components:
i. Architectural Works
ii. External Works
For the purpose of the assessment, each component is further divided into different elements or sub-
elements. The quality of workmanship and design of the completed building Works are assessed primarily
on workmanship standards evidently gathered through visualisations and of a qualified person during site
inspection.
Apart from site inspection, the assessment shall also include declaration on the materials used and the
functional performance test results of selected services and installation. These tests and standard
practices of assessments help to safeguard the interest of building occupants in relation to quality of
workmanship and material lwhich surface after sometime.
2
1.3 Normative references
The following normative reference is indispensable for the application of this construction industry
standard. The latest edition of the normative reference (including any amendments) shall apply.
i) Uniform Building By-Laws (UBBL) 1984
ii) Lembaga Pembangunan Industri Pembinaan Malaysia Act 1994 (Act 520)
1.4 Terms and definition For the purpose of this CIS, the following definitions apply.
i) Approved standards
Approved standards shall mean standards specified in the CIS 7, unless specified otherwise by the
qualified person for the project.
ii) Component
QLASSIC assessment is divided into two different components, which are architectural works and
external works.
iii) Delamination
Delayering of a laminated finish
iv) Elements
A subdivision of a component, for example floor finishing for architectural works, drains for external
works and other architectural and external works.
v) Hollowness
No hollow sound when swiped using a tapping rod specified by CIDB
vi) Lippage
Variation in the height of adjoining tiles
vii) Patchiness
Existing or happening in small, isolated areas
viii) Qualified Person (QP)
A QP as defined in the Uniform Building By-Laws 1984.
ix) Superintendent officer (SO)
The SO shall be the person appointed to administer the contract during construction
x) Warpage
The extent or result of being bent or twisted out of shape
3
1.5 Abbreviations The abbreviations used in this publication are as follows:
i) CATV/CCTV
Community Antenna TV/ Closed-circuit TV
ii) CIDB Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia
iii) CIS Construction industry standard
iv) M&E Mechanical & electrical
v) QLASSIC Quality assessment system in construction
vi) RWDP Rain water down pipes
1.6 Objectives
This CIS was designed with two objectives:
i. To have a standard quality assessment system for building construction works.
ii. To make quality assessment more objective by measuring completed works against workmanship standards and specification.
1.7 Assessment components and elements
This standard covers most aspects of general building works for architectural and external works.
As specified in this standard the elements to be assessed under each of the following components are: -
i. Architectural Works
Architectural Works component covers the aesthetics of the building in relation to the
workmanship quality of the finishes and its elements. This is where the quality and standard
of workmanship are most visible. The assessment covers the following elements and sub-
elements:
a. Site inspection of internal finishes (floor, internal wall, ceiling, door,
window,internal fixtures and others);
b. Site inspection of external finishes (roof, external wall, apron & perimeter drain,
carpark/ carporch and others);
c. Material and functional tests (field window water-tightness test, wet area water-
tightness test and pull-off-test for internal wall tiles).
ii. External Works
4
This component covers the general external works elements found in building construction
works or in the projectsthat would include:
a. link way (including shelter)
b. external drains
c. roadworks
d. footpaths
e. turfing
f. playground
g. court (sports)
h. fence and gate
i. swimming pool
j. other functional buildings/structures with floor area more than 300m2
SECTION 2: ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
2.1 Architectural Works
Architectural works deal mainly with internal and external finishes. This is where the quality and standard of workmanship are most visible.
The assessment criteria for architectural works are as below:
2.1.1 Internal Finishes – Floor
Table 1: Type of floor finishes
No. Type of finishes
1 Cement Sand Screed
2 Tiles
3 Engineered Timber/ Material
4 Carpet
5 Vinyl/ Linoleum
6 Others
5
Table 2: The assessment criteria for floor
No. Defect Group
Requirements Type of Finishes
Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
1 Finishing
No construction stain marks All - Visual
Consistent colour tone/shading *except natural material
All - Visual
Surface should not be unduly rough or patchy
CS - Visual
No permanent foreign material visually detected
All - Visual
Finished texture to be uniform O - Visual
2
Alignment and
Evenness
Evenness of surface CS/ T/ ET/ V/ O
< 3 mm per 1.2 m
Spirit level 1.2m and steel
wedge
C - Visual
Falls in wet areas should be in right direction
CS/ T/ V/ O - Spirit level
1.2m
For staircase, the variance in lengths of treads and risers must not exceed 5 mm from dimensions specified in the approved drawings
CS/ T/ ET/ V /O
- Spirit level
1.2m and steel wedges
Joints are aligned with skirting tiles or wall tiles
T - Visual
Joints are aligned between tiles T - Visual
Lippage between two tiles T ≤ 1 mm
Tapping rod or L-square (200
mm x 300 mm) and steel
wedge
No protrusion/ potential of tripping over of panels
O - Visual
3 Cracks and Damages
No visible damages/ defects ( e.g.: chipping, broken tiles, crack tiles, scratches, broken timber, etc.)
All - Visual
No warpage or sagging ET/ T - Visual
No loose floor panels or rocking O - Visual
6
Table 2: The assessment criteria for floor…..continue
No. Defect Group
Requirements Type of Finishes
Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
4 Hollowness/ Delamination
No hollow sound when swipe and then tapped
CS/ T/ O - Tapping rod
No sign of delamination/ debonding
ET/ O - Visual & Physical
Timber strips to rest firmly on joists or screeds
ET - Visual & Physical
5 Jointing Edge to be straight and aligned All - Visual
Consistent skirting thickness and no visible gaps between wall and skirting
All - Visual
Joints are of consistent size and no visible voids
T - Visual
Consistent and neat marking T - Visual
Edges of the floor are properly sealed and anchored
ET/ C - Visual
NOTE::
1. C Carpet 2. CS Cement sand screed 3. ET Engineered timber/ material 4. O Others 5. T Tiles 6. V Vinyl/ linoleum
2.1.2 Internal Finishes – Internal Wall
Table 3: Type of internal wall finishes
No. Type of Finishes
1 Plaster finishes
2 Tiles
3 Painting
4 Facing Brick
5 Wall paper
6 Wood /timber panel
7 Cladding
8 Glass blocks/ Glass panels
9 Textured Plaster
8 Others
7
8
Table 4: The assessment criteria for internal wall
No. Defect Group
Requirements Type of Finishes
Tolerance Assessment Tool/
Method
1 Finishing
No construction stain marks All - Visual
Consistent colour tone and good paint work
All - Visual
No rough/patchy surface
PF/ P/ TP - Visual
Surface should be smoothly finished
WT - Visual
No brush marks to be seen P - Visual
Good opacity, no patchiness resulted from touch up work
PF/ P/ TP - Visual
Paints evenly applied P - Visual
Surface should be free from peeling, blister, chalkiness (no discolouration and fading)
P - Visual and physical
2 Alignment
and Evenness
Evenness of surface All ≤ 3 mm
over 1.2 m Spirit level 1.2m and steel wedge
Verticality of wall All - Visual
Walls meet at right angle All ≤ 4mm
over 300 mm
L-square (200 mm x 300 mm and steel wedge
Joints are aligned between tiles
T - Visual
Lippage between two tiles T ≤ 1 mm
Tapping rod or L-square (200 mm x 300 mm and steel
wedge
Wall paper should be stretched and even surface
WP - Visual
Glass blocks/panels should be properly aligned
GB - Visual
3 Cracks and Damages
No visible damages/ defects /visual crack/dent/scratches/ corrosion
All - Visual
Warpage should not be detected
T/ WT - Visual
9
Table 4: The assessment criteria for internal wall…continue
No. Defect Group Requirements Type of Finishes
Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
4 Hollowness/ Delamination
No hollow sound when swipe and tapped
PF/ T/ TP - Tapping rod
No sign of delamination WP/ WT - Physical
Timber panels should rest firmly on joists screed
WT - Visual and physical
5 Jointing Edges to be straight, aligned and consistent
All - Visual
Joints should not be visible WP - Visual
Proper anchoring at all edges WP - Visual
Edges should be neatly laid and finished
WP - Visual
Consistent and neat marking TF/FB/ CL/GB - Visual
Joints between tiles consistent in size
T - Visual
Proper anchorage for panels CL - Visual
Edges should be properly aligned and sealed
WT - Visual
Consistent spacing and within allowable tolerance
CL - Visual
NOTE::
1. AC Architectural coating 2. C Carpet 3. CL Cladding 4. CS Cement sand screed 5. ET Engineered timber/ material 6. FB Facing brick 7. FCGS False ceiling/ grid system 8. GB Glass blocks/ glass panels 9. O Others 10. P Painting 11. PF Plaster finishes 12. PSCC Plaster / skim coat ceiling 13. T Tiles 14. TP Textured plaster 15. V Vinyl/ linoleum 16. WP Wall paper 17. WT Wood /timber panel
10
2.1.3 Internal Finishes – Ceiling
Table 5: Type of ceiling finishes
No. Type of finishes
1 Plaster / Skim coat ceiling
2 False ceiling/grid system
Table 6: The assessment criteria for ceiling
No. Defect Group Requirements Type of Finishes
Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
1 Finishing
No stain marks All - Visual
Consistent colour tone All - Visual
Paintwork with good opacity and with no brush marks
All - Visual
2 Alignment and
Evenness
Surface should be smooth, even, not wavy and not sagging
All - Visual
Straight and aligned ceiling edges
All - Visual
Alignment of rails should be visually straight
FCGS - Visual
Laid neatly into grids FCGS - Visual
3 Cracks and Damages
No visible damages (e.g.: spalling, leaks cracks, chipped, cracked surfaces or corners should not be detected, etc.)
All - Visual
No pin holes PSCC - Visual
No sign of corrosion FCGS - Visual
Panels should not warp FCGS - Visual
4 Roughness & Patchiness
No rough or patchy surfaces All - Visual
No trowels marks PSCC - Visual
5 Jointing
Consistent, aligned and neat All - Visual
Access opening joints should be neat and consistent width
All - Visual
Formwork joints are grounded smooth
PSCC - Visual
Gap between ceiling and wall should not be detected
All - Visual
Consistent, aligned and neat All - Visual
NOTE::
11
1. FCGS False ceiling/ grid system 2. PSCC Plaster / skim coat ceiling
12
2.1.4 Internal Finishes – Door
Table 7: Type of door finishes
No. Type of finishes
1 Panel door
2 Decorative door
3 Flush door
4 Sliding door
5 Glass door
6 Others
Table 8: The assessment criteria for door
No. Defect Group Requirements Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
1 Joints and Gaps
Consistent gap between bottom of door leaf and finished floor
≤ 5 mm / Project
requirement Steel wedge
No visible gaps between door frame and wall
- Visual
Neat joints between door frame and wall internally and externally
- Visual
Consistent gap between door leaf and frame
≤ 5 mm / Project
requirement Steel gauge
Consistent and no visible gaps for joints at door leaf and frame
- Visual
2 Alignment and
Evenness
Aligned and level with walls - Visual
Double leaf doors to flush with each other
- Visual
Doors frame and leaf to flush - Visual
Door leaf and frame corners maintained at right angles
- L-square (200 x
300)mm
No rattling sound when the door is closed
- Physical and
auditory (hearing)
13
Table 8: The assessment criteria for door…continue
No. Defect Group Requirements Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
3 Materials and
Damages
No stains marks and any visible damages
- Visual
No sags, warps on door leaf - Visual
Door joints and nail holes filled up, properly sanded with good paintwork
- Visual
Glazing clean and evenly sealed with gasket
- Visual
No sign of corrosion - Visual
Good paintwork (including top and bottom of door leaf)
- Visual and
angle mirror
Consistent colour tone - Visual
4 Functionality
Ease in opening, closing and locking
- Physical
No squeaky sound during opening and closing of the door
Test minimum 1 time continuously
Physical and auditory (hearing)
Lockset should be functional Test minimum 1
time continuously Physical
5
Accessories Defects (e.g., lock set, door knob, hinges,
door closer and door stopper)
Accessories with good fit and no stains
- Visual
No sign of corrosion - Visual
No missing or defective accessories
- Visual
Screws levelled and flushed. No over-tightened screws
- Visual
For timber frame, no additional timber strips added for site adjustment should be detected
- Visual
2.1.5 Internal Finishes – Window
Table 9: Type of window finishes
No. Type of finishes
1 Casement window
2 Top hung window
3 Sliding window
4 Louvre window
5 Adjustable window
14
6 Others
Table 10: The assessment criteria for window
No. Defect Group Requirements Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
1 Joints and Gaps
Consistent gap between window leaf and frame (for timber window only)
- Visual
No visible gaps between window frame and wall
- Visual
Neat joints between window frame and wall, internally and externally
- Visual
Consistent and no visible gaps for joints at window leaf and at frame
- Visual
2 Alignment and
Evenness
Alignment/level with wall openings - Visual
Window leaf and frame corner maintained at right angles
- Visual
3 Materials and
Damages
No stain marks and visible damages/ defects
- Visual
Louvered window with glass panels of correct length
- Visual
Glazing clean and evenly sealed with sealant or gasket for aluminium windows
- Visual
No sign of corrosion - Visual
Good paintwork - Visual
4 Functionality
Ease opening, closing and locking - Physical
No squeaky sound during opening and closing of the window
Tested minimum 1
time continuously
Physical and auditory (hearing)
No sign of rainwater leakage - Visual
5
Accessories Defects (e.g., hinges, screw,
security bar and handle )
Lock sets with good fit and aligned - Visual
No sign of corrosion - Visual
No missing or defective accessories
- Visual
Screws levelled and flushed. No over-tightened screws
- Visual
15
2.1.6 Internal Finishes – Internal Fixtures
Table 11: Type of internal fixtures finishes
No. Type of finishes
1 Wardrobe
2 Kitchen cabinet
3 Bathtub and basin
4 Vanity top
5 Water closet
6 Railing
7 Sink
8 Mirror
9 Shower screen
10 Shower tray
11 Framed or frameless tempered glass shower enclosure
12 Others
Table 12: The assessment criteria for internal fixtures
No. Defect Group Requirements Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
1 Joints and Gaps
Consistent joint width and neat - Visual
No visible gaps - Visual
Welding joints grounded or flushed - Visual
2 Alignment and
Evenness Level and in alignment - Visual
3 Materials and
Damages
No stain marks - Visual
No visible damages/ defects - Visual
Consistent in colour tone - Visual
4 Functionality Functional, secured and safe - Visual & Physical
5 Accessories Defects
No missing accessories - Visual
No sign of corrosion - Visual
No damages/ defects
- Visual
Note: All M&E fitting that come with internal fixtures shall be assess as part of internal fixtures consider under accessories
16
17
2.1.7 Basic M&E Fittings
Table 13: Type of basic M&E fittings finishes
No. Type of finishes
1
Plumbing - gully and floor trap;
- pipes;
- fittings (e.g., water tap, shower rose, stop cock, and etc.)
2
M&E Fittings - power point, telephone point, air-cond diffuser, fan coil
unitlighting, smoke alarm, sprinkler heads, CATV/CCTV
camera, speakers, alarm system, etc.
Table 14: The assessment criteria for basic M&E fittings (Plumbing)
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance
Assessment Tool/ Method
1
Gully and floor trap
Joints and Gaps
No visible gap - Visual
Consistent joints width and neat
- Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Aligned, levelled and straight - Visual & Spirit
level 1.2m
Traps top lower than the surrounding floor level
- Visual
Materials and Damages
No visible damages/ defects - Visual
No stain marks - Visual
Consistent colour tone - Visual
Functionality and Safety
No operational defects - Visual & Physical
Must be securely fixed - Physical
No chokings - Visual
Accessories Defects (e.g., Floor trap
cover)
No missing accessories - Visual
No visible damages/ defects - Visual
Accessories with good fit and no stains
- Visual
18
Table 14: The assessment criteria for basic M&E fittings (Plumbing)…continue
No. Sub-elements
Defect Group Requirements Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
2
Pipes
Joints and Gaps
No visible gap - Visual
Consistent joints width and neat - Visual
Joints properly sealed and marked - Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Aligned, levelled and straight - Visual & Spirit
level
Horizontal, vertical and parallel aligned to building surface
- Visual
Materials and Damages
No stain marks - Visual
Consistent colour tone - Visual
If painted, no drippings with good opacity
- Visual
No visible damages/ defects, bent without distortion and kink
- Visual
Functionality and Safety
No operational defects - Visual & Physical
No leakage at joints - Visual
Securely fixed - Physical
Accessories Defects (eg., Bracket &
Screw)
No missing accessories - Visual
Brackets securely fixed & pipes properly support
- Visual
19
Table 14: The assessment criteria for basic M&E fittings (Plumbing)…continue
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance
Assessment Tool/ Method
3 Fittings
Joints and Gaps
No visible gap - Visual
Consistent joints width and neat - Visual
Joints properly sealed and marked - Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Aligned, levelled and straight - Visual
Materials and Damages
No visible damages/ defects (e.g., chipping or cracks)
- Visual
No stain marks (e.g., paint drops or mortar droppings)
- Visual
Consistent colour tone - Visual
Functionality and Safety
No operational defects - Visual
No leakage at joints - Visual
Securely fixed - Physical
Fittings in working condition Visual and Physical
Accessible for maintenance Visual
All sensors covers properly sealed against water seepage
Visual
Accessories Defects (Moveable parts: e.g.,
screw, capping, shower rose)
No missing accessories Visual
No visible damages/defects Visual
Accessories with good fit and no stains
Visual
20
Table 15: The assessment criteria for basic M&E fittings (M&E Fittings)
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance
Assessment Tool/ Method
1
Installation (include
power point, telephone point, air-
cond diffuser, fan coil unit,
lighting, smoke alarm,
sprinkler heads,
CATV/CCTV camera,
speakers, alarm
system, etc. )
Joints and Gaps
No visible gaps - Visual
Consistent joints width and neat
- Visual
Neat patch-up for marking/penetration
- Visual
No visible gap between switches and walls
- Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Aligned, levelled and straight
- Visual & Spirit
level
Heights of switch and marks should be consistent
- Visual
Materials and Damages
No visible damages/ defects - Visual
No stain marks - Visual
Consistent colour tone - Visual
Functionality and Safety
No operational defects - Visual & Physical
Securely fixed, functional and safe
- Physical
Switch can properly function Tested
minimum 1 time
Physical
Accessories Defects (Moveable parts;
e.g., screw, capping, switches button)
No missing accessories - Visual
No visible damages/defects - Visual
Accessories with good fit and no stains
- Visual
21
2.1.8 External Finishes – Roof
Table 16: Type of roof finishes
No. Type of finishes
1 Flat roof
2 Pitched roof
Table 17: The assessment criteria for roof
No. Element Requirements Tolerance Assessment
Tool/ Method
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
1.
General
requirements
i. Finishing
• Nostainmarks - Visual
• Goodpaintwork - Visual
ii. Rough/Uneven/Falls
• Smoothandwithnotoolmarks - Visual
• Evenandlevel,especiallywithno
potentialofstripping - Visual
• Fallsinrightdirection - Visual
iii.Cracks and Damages
• Novisibledamages/ defects,e.g.,
cracks, chippings, etc.
-
Visual
iv.Joint/Sealant/Alignment
• Consistentjointwidth,neatand
aligned
- Visual
v. Chockage/Ponding
• Nosignofchockageandponding
Visual
vi.Construction
• Nosignofleaking - Visual
• Properdressingforanyprotrusion - Visual
• Neatandsecuredinstallationof
Fixtures (such as solar cell roof) - Visual
2.
Flatroof
(e.g., concrete flat roof and membrane roof)
• Waterponding <3mm Visual and
measuringtape
• Surfacetoleveltoavoidtripping - Visual
• Openingstobesealedtoprevent
pestinvasion - Visual
22
Table 17: The assessment criteria for roof…continue
No. Element Standard Tolerance Assessment
Tool/ Method
6.
3.
Pitched roof(e.g., concrete and clay tiles, profile metal tiles, pressed metal tiles and solar cell roof)
• Norustorstains - Visual
• Goodpaintingtoroofstructural
members - Visual
• Rooftilesinalignment - Visual
• Openingstobesealedtoprevent
pestinvasion - Visual
• Consistentcolourtone - Visual
4. Waterproofing (exposed)
• Evenlyinstalled,nosharp
Protrusion - Visual
• Completeadhesiontobase - Visual
• Goodlapsatjointsandproper
verticalabutment details - Visual
• Nosignsofdamagetomembrane/
coating - Visual
• Nopaintdefects - Visual
5. Gutters and
RWDP
• Nopondingandchockage - Visual
• Nocracks,chipsandanyother
visibledamages/ defects - Visual
• RWDPinlettobelowerthanthe
surroundinggutterinvert level - Visual
• GutterandRWDPinlettobe
covered to prevent chockage,
where practical
- Visual
2.1.9 External Finishes – External Wall
Table 18: Type of external wall finishes
No. Type of finishes
1 Plaster finishes
2 Tiles
3 Cladding/curtain wall
4 Facing brickwork
5 Architectural coating
23
6 Painting
Table 19: The assessment criteria for external wall
No. Defect Group Requirements Type of Finishes
Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
1 Finishing
No stain marks (e.g. mortar stain, paint stain, paint drips)
All - Visual
Consistent colour tone, good paintwork, no efflorescence, no discolouration and fading
All - Visual
No rough/ patchy surface All - Visual
No sign of corrosion CL - Visual
Surface should be free from peeling, blister and chalkiness
P - Visual
2 Alignment and
Evenness
Wall should be aligned and not wavy
All - Visual
Edges to be straight and aligned
All - Visual
Evenness of surface CL - Visual
3 Cracks and Damages
No visible damages/ defects /no dented or scratches
All - Visual
4 Jointing
Consistent and neat marking All - Visual
Joints are aligned between tiles, and consistent in size
T - Visual
No lippage between tiles T - Visual
Gaps around openings to be properly sealed
CL - Visual
Joints of regular width as specified
CL - Visual
Sealant material compatible with cladding
CL - Visual
Weep holes are provided as specified
FB - Visual
NOTE::
1. CL Cladding 2. FB Facing brick 3. P Painting 4. T Tiles
24
2.1.10 External Finishes – Apron & Perimeter Drain
The assessment for the apron & perimeter drain shall be carried out together with the
drain cover and inspection chamber.
Table 20: The assessment criteria for apron & perimeter drain
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance
Assessment Tool/ Method
1 Apron &
Perimeter drain
Finishing No stain marks - Visual
No patchiness & brush marks - Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Finishes must be even, level, aligned and consistent
- Visual
Level and do not wrap or rock - Visual
Cracks and Damages
No visible cracks and damages - Visual
Fall/Gradient Free flowing and no water ponding
- Visual
Joints and Gaps Consistent joints width and neat - Visual
2
Drain cover/
Inspection Chamber
Finishing
No stain marks - Visual
No patchiness & brush marks - Visual
No sign of corrosion on the drain grating
- Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Finishes must be even, level, aligned and consistent
- Visual
Level and do not wrap or rock - Visual & Physical
Cracks and Damages
No visible cracks and damages - Visual
Fixtures installed must be safe, secured and functional
- Visual and Physical
Fall/Gradient
Free flowing and no water ponding
- Visual
Drain grating to be safely and securely fixed and functional
- Visual
Joints and Gaps
Consistent joints width and neat - Visual
Gap between drain covers 5-10 mm
wide
Steel measuring
tape
Gap between sides of drain 5-10 mm
wide
Steel measuring
tape
25
2.1.11 External Finishes – Car Park / Car Porch
Car park / car porch isan area or building where cars or other vehicles may be left
temporarily such as multi-level car park and car porch attached with the building.
Table 21: The assessment criteria for car park/ car porch
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance
Assessment Tool/ Method
1
Carpark / Car Porch (item
to be assessed are Floor, Wall,
Ceiling, Column,
Fixtures & Basic M&E
fittings)
Finishing
No stain marks - Visual
Consistent colour tone and good paintwork
- Visual
No rough/patchy surface - Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Evenness of surface - Visual
Falls in right direction - Spirit Level
1.2m
Edge to be straight - Visual
Materials and Damages
No visible damages/ defects - Visual
No missing or defective accessories
- Visual
No sign of corrosion - Visual
Functionality Securely fixed, functional and safe
- Visual and physical
Joints and gap
Consistent joints width and neat
- Visual
No visible gaps for M&E fittings
- Visual
2.2 External Works
External works cover the general external work elements in building construction such as the link-
way (including shelters), external drain, roadwork (including parking bay), footpath, turfing,
playground, court (sports), fence and gate, swimming pool, and other functional buildings/
structure with floor area more than 300m2 * each in projects/ development.
NOTE:
* based on the average size of Community Hall (source Ministry of Housing and Local Government)
The assessment criteria for external works are given as below:
26
2.2.1 Link Way (including shelter)
There are a few items to be assessed for the link way & shelter, which include:
a) Floor,
b) Column,
c) Ceiling,
d) Roof covering;
e) Fixtures;
f) Basic M&E fittings;
Table 22: The assessment criteria for link way (including shelter)
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance
Assessment Tool/ Method
1
Floor, Column, Ceiling,
Roof Covering
Fixtures and Basic M&E
fittings
Finishing
No stain marks - Visual
Consistent colour and good paintwork
- Visual
No rough/patchy surface - Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Evenness of surface - Visual
Edge to be straight - Visual
Materials and Damages
No visible damages/ defects
- Visual
No missing or defective accessories
- Visual
No sign of corrosion - Visual
Functionality Securely fixed, functional and safe
- Visual & physical
Joints and gap
Consistent joints width and neat
- Visual
No visible gaps for M&E fittings
- Visual
2.2.2 External Drain
There are a few items to be assessed for the external drain, which include:
a) Drain 1,
b) Drain 2,
c) Drain cover,
d) Inspection Chamber 1 and
e) Inspection Chamber 2
27
Table 23: The assessment criteria for external drain
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group
Requirements Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
1 7. Drain
Finishing No stain marks - Visual
No rough/patchy surface - Visual
Alignment and
Evenness
Finishes must be even, level, aligned and consistent
- Visual
Level and do not wrap or rock - Visual
Material and Damages
No visible cracks and damages - Visual
Functionality Free flowing and no water ponding, no siltation
- Visual
8. Securely fixed, functional and safe - Visual & Physical
Joints and Gaps
Consistent joints width and neat - Visual
2
Drain cover/
Inspection Chamber
9.
Finishing
No stain marks - Visual
No patchiness & brush marks - Visual
No sign of corrosion on the drain grating
- Visual
Drain grating properly painted - Visual
Alignment and
Evenness
Finishes must be even, level, aligned and consistent
- Visual
Level and do not wrap or rock - Visual & Physical
Cover to be level with frame - Visual
Material and Damages
No visible cracks and damages - Visual
Fixtures installed must be safe, secured and functional
- Visual & Physical
Functionality
Free flowing and no water ponding - Visual
Drain grating to be safely and securely fixed and functional
- Visual
Joints and Gaps
Consistent joints width and neat - Visual
Gap between drain covers 5-10 mm
wide Steel measuring
tape
Gap between sides of drain 5-10 mm
wide Steel measuring
tape
Inspection chambers are level with surroundings without depression and with tolerance of 20mm for protrusion
- Visual & Steel
measuring tape
28
2.2.3 Roadworks (including parking bay)
There are a few items to be assessed for the roadwork and carpark on the ground, which
include:
a) Road surface;
b) Road Marking;
c) Kerbs;
d) Road Sign; and
e) Road Lightings
Table 24: The assessment criteria for roadworks (including parking bay)
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance
Assessment Tool/ Method
1
Road surface,
Road Marking,
Kerbs,Road Sign and
Road Lighting
Finishing
No stain marks - Visual
Consistent colour and good paintwork
- Visual
No rough/patchy surface - Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Evenness of surface - Visual
Edge to be straight - Visual
No water ponding - Visual
Materials and Damages
No visible damages/ defects
- Visual
No missing or defective accessories
- Visual
No sign of corrosion - Visual
Functionality Securely fixed, functional and safe
- Visual and physical
Joints and gaps
Consistent joints width and neat
- Visual
No visible gaps for M&E fittings
- Visual
29
2.2.4 Footpath & Turfing
There are a few items to be assessed for the footpath & turfing, which include:
a) Footpaths,
b) Turfing (e.g., close, sport and others)
c) Lighting,
d) Fixtures (e.g., fixed benches, signage, railing, etc.)
Table 25: The assessment criteria for footpath & turfing
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance
Assessment Tool/ Method
1
Footpaths, Turfing, Lighting, Fixtures
(e.g., fixed benches, signage,
railing, etc.)
Finishing
No stain marks - Visual
Consistent colour and good paintwork
- Visual
No rough/patchy surface - Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Evenness of surface - Visual
Edge to be straight - Visual
Materials and Damages
No visible damages/ defects
- Visual
No missing or defective accessories
- Visual
No sign of corrosion - Visual
No depression or bald patches
- Visual
Turfing done evenly, no dead grass or weeds
- Visual
Functionality Securely fixed, functional and safe
- Visual and physical
Joints and gaps
Consistent joints width and neat
- Visual
No visible gaps for M&E fittings
- Visual
30
2.2.5 Playground
There are a few items to be assessed for the playground, which include:
a) Floor finish,
b) Playground Equipment,
c) Lighting,
d) Side Drain and
e) Fixtures (e.g., fencing, fixed bench, signage, etc.)
Table 26: The assessment criteria for playground
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance
Assessment Tool/ Method
1
Floor finish, Playground Equipment,
Lighting, Side Drain
and Fixtures
Finishing
No stain marks - Visual
Consistent colour and good paintwork
- Visual
No rough/patchy surface - Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Evenness of surface - Visual
Edge to be straight - Visual
Free flowing of water - Visual
No water ponding with no siltation
- Visual
Materials and Damages
No visible damages/ defects
- Visual
No missing or defective accessories
- Visual
No sign of corrosion - Visual
Functionality Securely fixed, functional and safe
- 10.
Joints and gaps
Consistent joints width and neat
- Visual
No visible gaps for M&E fittings
- Visual
31
2.2.6 Court (sports)
There are a few items to be assessed for the court (sports), which include:
a) Floor 1 (Inside court),
b) Floor 2 (Outside court),
c) Signage,
d) Basic M&E Fittings and
e) Fixtures (eg., net post, fencing, fixed bench, etc)
Table 27: The assessment criteria for court (sports)
No. Sub-elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance Assessment Tool/ Method
1
Floor 1 (Inside court), Floor 2 (Outsidecourt),
Signage, Basic M&E Fittings and
Fixtures (e.g., net post,
fencing, fixed bench, etc.)
Finishing
No stain marks
- Visual
Consistent colour and good paintwork
- Visual
No rough/patchy surface
- Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Evenness of surface
- Visual
Edge to be straight
- Visual
No water ponding
- Visual
Materials and Damages
No visible damages/ defects
- Visual
No missing or defective accessories
- Visual
No sign of corrosion
- Visual
Functionality Securely fixed, functional and safe
- 11.
Joints and gaps
Consistent joints width and neat
- Visual
No visible gaps for M&E fittings
- Visual
32
2.2.7 Fence & Gate
There are a few items to be assessed for fence and gate, which include:
a) Fence,
b) Gate,
c) Basic M&E fittings, and
d) Fixtures
Table 28: The assessment criteria for fence & gate
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance
Assessment Tool/ Method
1
Fence, Gate, Basic M&E fittings, and Fixtures
Finishing
No stain marks
- Visual
Consistent colour and good paintwork
- Visual
No rough/patchy surface
- Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Evenness of surface
- Visual
Edge to be straight
- Visual
Piers and gate to be vertical, perpendicular and straight.Gate to be parallel and aligned
- Visual
Materials and Damages
No visible damages/ defects
- Visual
No missing or defective accessories
- Visual
No sign of corrosion
- Visual
Functionality Securely fixed, functional and safe
- Visual and physical
Joints and gaps
Consistent joints width and neat
- Visual
No visible gaps for M&E fittings
- Visual
33
2.2.8 Swimming Pool
There are a few items to be assessed for swimming pool, which is include:
a) Overflow drain,
b) Pool deck,
c) Ladder and Railing,
d) Basic M&E fittings and;
e) Fixtures
Table 29: The assessment criteria for swimming pool
No. Sub-
elements Defect Group Requirements Tolerance
Assessment Tool/ Method
1
Overflow drain, Pool
deck, Ladder and Railing, Basic M&E fittings and
fixtures
Finishing
No stain marks
- Visual
Consistent colour and good paintwork
- Visual
No rough/patchy surface
- Visual
Alignment and Evenness
Evenness of surface
- Visual
Edge to be straight
- Visual
Materials and Damages
No visible damages/ defects
- Visual
No missing or defective accessories
- Visual
No sign of delamination - Visual & Physical
No sign of corrosion
- Visual
Functionality
No chockage
- Visual
Securely fixed, functional and safe
- Visual and physical
Joints and gaps
Consistent joints width and neat
- Visual
No visible gaps for M&E fittings
- Visual
34
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The technical committee which developed the CIS consists of the following representatives: Advisor
Datuk Ir. Ahmad 'Asri Abdul Hamid Chief Executive CIDB Malaysia
Chairman
Datuk Ir. Elias Ismail Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) Malaysia
Tuan Haji Razuki Bin Haji Ibrahim
En. Mohammad Faizal Abdul Hamid
En. Mohamad Fazirul Izat Bin Mohamad Termizi
Ministry
Ar. Haji Zamhuri bin Ramli Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan
En. Rohaimi Mansor Tempatan
Agencies
Dr. Alauddin Bin Sidal Jabatan Perumahan Negara
En. Yahya Bin Ab Ghani
Ir. Anisah binti Saim Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia
Ir.Faizan bt Ismail
Ir.Sanisah binti Haji Sulaiman
Pn. Durrah Munierahhanies Binti Azizan
Professional Bodies Ar. Steven Thang Pertubuhan Akitek Malaysia
Construction Association
En. Nor Azahar Bin Md Husain Real Estate & Housing Developers’ Association
Ir. Chuan Yeong Min Master Builders Association Malaysia
Mohd Farhan Mohammad Din
Ir. Kuah Kee Hong Association of Consulting Engineers Malaysia Sr. Isacc Sunder Rajan Chartered Association of Building Engineers Ar. Ng Yean Shiunn National House Buyer Association En. Kuan You Wai
35
Learning Institution
Prof. Ar. Dr. Abdul Razak Sapian International Islamic University Malaysia
Ar. Dr. Srazali Aripin
Research Institute
En. Syed Hazni Abd Gani Construction Research Institute of Malaysia
En. Mohammad Darsuki Lahat