Upload
jason-george
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 pub2818_1
1/4
ClientAlert
Latham & Watkins operates as a limited liability partnership worldwide with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the
practice in the United Kingdom, France and Italy and affiliated partnerships conducting the practice in Hong Kong and Japan.
Under New Yorks Code of Professional Responsibility, portions of this communication contain attorney advertising. Prior results do
not guarantee a similar outcome. Results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each representation. Please direct all inquiriesregarding our conduct under New Yorks Disciplinary Rules to Latham & Watkins LLP, 885 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022-4834
Phone: +1.212.906.1200. Copyright 2009 Latham & Watkins. All Rights Reserved.
Number 934 September 21, 2009
Latham & Watkins
Finance and Tax Departments
Taxpayers mayelect to apply
these ProposedRegulations
now, before they
become final.
New Proposed Regulations on TaxExempt Financing of Solid Waste DisposalFacilities Welcome Guidance thatTaxpayers May Apply Immediately
On September 15, 2009, the US
Treasury Department issued new
Proposed Regulations outlining the
requirements for solid waste disposal
facilities seeking to be financed on
a tax-exempt basis. As noted in this
Alert, the effect of the Proposed
Regulations should make access by
private companies to tax-exempt bond
financing for solid waste disposal
facilities quite a bit easier. Taxpayers
may elect to apply these ProposedRegulations now, before they become
final.
In the recent past, taxpayers desiring to
use tax-exempt bonds to finance their
solid waste disposal facilities have been
discouraged by the requirement under
the existing Regulations that the solid
waste have no value as of the issue
date of the bonds (no-value rule). Over
the years, markets have developed for
the sale of solid waste, such as used
tires, waste paper and cardboard.
These markets have made it extremely
difficult for taxpayers to establish that
the solid waste to be used in a facility
has no value. In that regard, the IRS
has challenged a significant number
of taxpayers using tax-exempt bonds
to finance their solid waste disposal
facilities under the no-value rule.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
now acknowledge that the no-value
rule cannot be administered. The
Proposed Regulations eliminate the
no-value rule, making it much easier
to qualify a significant portion of a
plant as a solid waste disposal facility.
Instead, the Proposed Regulations take
a different approach and focus on two
factors in defining a qualifying solid
waste disposal facility: (i) whether the
material is solid waste and (ii) thenature of the disposal process applied
to the solid waste.
Qualifying Solid Waste
The Proposed Regulations define
solid waste as garbage, refuse and
other solid material derived from any
agricultural, commercial, consumer
or industrial operation or activity that
is intended to be introduced into the
disposal process within a reasonable
time after acquisition. In other words,material that is acquired with an intent
to resell or store it does not qualify as
solid waste.
Solid waste must be either used
material or residual material and
cannot be raw material (other than
scraps), solids within liquids (such as
silt) or liquid waste, precious materials
8/8/2019 pub2818_1
2/4
2 Number 934 | September 21, 2009
Latham & Watkins | Client Alert
or hazardous or radioactive material.
Solid waste is used material if it has
previously been used as an agricultural,
commercial, consumer or industrial
product or as a component of any
such product. Used tires, discardednewspapers and magazines, and old
cardboard boxes certainly qualify as
used material.
Residual material is any residual
byproduct or excess unused raw material
(scrap) resulting from the production of
any agricultural, commercial, consumer
or industrial product but only if such
material (i) constitutes less than 5
percent of the total material introduced
into the production process and (ii) has
a fair market value lower than that ofany product made in the production
process. Tree bark derived from a
logging operation or waste coal from a
coal mining operation are examples of
residual material.
Qualifying Disposal Process
The Proposed Regulations establish
three categories of qualifying solid
waste disposal processes: (i) final
disposal process, (ii) energy conversion
process and (iii) recycling process. TheTreasury Department has made it clear
that these categories are intended to be
applied broadly so as to accommodate
future innovation and technology. Unless
otherwise restricted by the Proposed
Regulations, a solid waste disposal
process may employ any biological,
engineering, industrial or technological
method.
In this regard, the final disposal category
is generally limited to use of a landfill,
incineration without useful energygeneration and permanent containment.
The energy conversion category
includes any thermal, chemical or other
process that converts solid waste into
synthesis gas, heat, hot water, steam
or other useful energy. A recycling
process is defined as any process that
reconstitutes, transforms or otherwise
converts solid waste into a useful
product.
Identifying Qualifying Costs
The Proposed Regulations apply rules
similar to the existing Regulations in
identifying costs that can and cannot
be financed with tax-exempt bonds.In general, costs can be financed with
tax-exempt bond proceeds from the
beginning of the disposal process
up to the point that the first useful
product is produced, whether or
not such product is actually sold for
use. For example, costs incurred with
respect to an energy conversion process
that produces useful steam energy
from used tires would qualify for tax-
exempt financing, but costs incurred
in turning the steam into electricity
and transmitting it to the grid maynot qualify. In determining the point
at which the first useful product is
produced, the Proposed Regulations
provide that operational constraints
that affect the point at which a useful
product can reasonably be separated
from a continuous or integrated
production process will be considered.
Costs incurred for portions of a facility
that are functionally related and
subordinate to the solid waste disposal
facility, or that perform preliminaryfunctions, also qualify for tax-exempt
financing. For example, the cost of
a conveyor belt and storage bin for
qualifying solid waste generally will be
treated as part of the qualifying solid
waste disposal facility.
For mixed-use facilities facilities
that are used for both a qualified solid
waste disposal function and a non-
qualified function only the costs
allocable to the qualified solid waste
disposal function qualify for tax-exemptfinancing. Taxpayers generally are
permitted to allocate the costs between
a qualified solid waste disposal function
and a non-qualified function using any
reasonable method.
To the extent a qualified solid waste
disposal process uses both solid waste
and non-solid waste materials, only a
percentage of the costs of the property
8/8/2019 pub2818_1
3/4
3 Number 934 | September 21, 2009
Latham & Watkins | Client Alert
are eligible for tax-exempt financing,
unless at least 65 percent of the input
(by weight or volume) is qualifying solid
waste. If the annual percentage of solid
waste used in the disposal process is
65 percent or more, all qualifying costsof the property can be financed on a
tax-exempt basis. The 65 percent to 35
percent ratio of qualifying input to non-
qualifying input must be satisfied each
year the bonds are outstanding.
If less than 65 percent of the input
material is qualifying waste, only a
percentage of the costs equal to the
average annual percentage of qualifying
input (by weight or volume) qualifies
for tax-exempt financing. This rule is
illustrated in the Proposed Regulationsby an example in which 40 percent of
the input to an incinerator generating
steam for electricity is coal (presumably
not waste coal) and 60 percent of the
input is qualifying solid waste. In the
example, the taxpayer is permitted to
finance 60 percent of the costs of the
energy conversion process on a tax-
exempt basis. If only 35 percent of the
input to the incinerator had been coal,
all such costs would qualify.
Other Requirements
In addition to the specific requirements
applicable to solid waste disposal
facilities in the Proposed Regulations,
tax-exempt bonds issued to finance
such facilities must meet a host of other
requirements applicable to private
activity bonds as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code. These requirements
include:
A maximum bond term the
weighted average maturity of thebonds cannot exceed 120 percent
of the average reasonably expected
economic lives of the financed
facilities;
Restrictions on acquisitions of existing
property;
Public approval requirements ( i.e., a
public hearing and approval from the
issuer of the bonds);
Bond volume cap each state has a
volume cap that limits the principal
amount of private activity bonds that
can be issued annually by that state;
and
Cap on bond-financed issuance costs
no more than 2 percent of the bond
proceeds can be used to finance the
issuance costs.
If you have any questions about this
Client Alert, please contact one of the
authors listed below or the Latham
attorney with whom you normally
consult:
Bob Goldman
(312) 876-7641
Chicago
Ursula Hyman
(213) 891-7906
Los Angeles
8/8/2019 pub2818_1
4/4
4 Number 934 | September 21, 2009
Latham & Watkins | Client Alert
Client Alert is published by Latham & Watkins as a news reporting service to clients
and other friends. The information contained in this publication should not be
construed as legal advice. Should further analysis or explanation of the subject
matter be required, please contact the attorney whom you normally consult. A
complete list of our Client Alerts can be found on our Web site at www.lw.com.
If you wish to update your contact details or customize the information you receive
from Latham & Watkins, please visit www.lw.com/LathamMail.aspx to subscribe to
our global client mailings program.
Abu Dhabi
Barcelona
Brussels
Chicago
Doha
Dubai
Frankfurt
Hamburg
Hong Kong
London
Los Angeles
Madrid
Milan
Moscow
Munich
New Jersey
New York
Orange County
Paris
Rome
San Diego
San Francisco
Shanghai
Silicon Valley
Singapore
Tokyo
Washington, D.C.