pub2818_1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 pub2818_1

    1/4

    ClientAlert

    Latham & Watkins operates as a limited liability partnership worldwide with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the

    practice in the United Kingdom, France and Italy and affiliated partnerships conducting the practice in Hong Kong and Japan.

    Under New Yorks Code of Professional Responsibility, portions of this communication contain attorney advertising. Prior results do

    not guarantee a similar outcome. Results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each representation. Please direct all inquiriesregarding our conduct under New Yorks Disciplinary Rules to Latham & Watkins LLP, 885 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022-4834

    Phone: +1.212.906.1200. Copyright 2009 Latham & Watkins. All Rights Reserved.

    Number 934 September 21, 2009

    Latham & Watkins

    Finance and Tax Departments

    Taxpayers mayelect to apply

    these ProposedRegulations

    now, before they

    become final.

    New Proposed Regulations on TaxExempt Financing of Solid Waste DisposalFacilities Welcome Guidance thatTaxpayers May Apply Immediately

    On September 15, 2009, the US

    Treasury Department issued new

    Proposed Regulations outlining the

    requirements for solid waste disposal

    facilities seeking to be financed on

    a tax-exempt basis. As noted in this

    Alert, the effect of the Proposed

    Regulations should make access by

    private companies to tax-exempt bond

    financing for solid waste disposal

    facilities quite a bit easier. Taxpayers

    may elect to apply these ProposedRegulations now, before they become

    final.

    In the recent past, taxpayers desiring to

    use tax-exempt bonds to finance their

    solid waste disposal facilities have been

    discouraged by the requirement under

    the existing Regulations that the solid

    waste have no value as of the issue

    date of the bonds (no-value rule). Over

    the years, markets have developed for

    the sale of solid waste, such as used

    tires, waste paper and cardboard.

    These markets have made it extremely

    difficult for taxpayers to establish that

    the solid waste to be used in a facility

    has no value. In that regard, the IRS

    has challenged a significant number

    of taxpayers using tax-exempt bonds

    to finance their solid waste disposal

    facilities under the no-value rule.

    The Treasury Department and the IRS

    now acknowledge that the no-value

    rule cannot be administered. The

    Proposed Regulations eliminate the

    no-value rule, making it much easier

    to qualify a significant portion of a

    plant as a solid waste disposal facility.

    Instead, the Proposed Regulations take

    a different approach and focus on two

    factors in defining a qualifying solid

    waste disposal facility: (i) whether the

    material is solid waste and (ii) thenature of the disposal process applied

    to the solid waste.

    Qualifying Solid Waste

    The Proposed Regulations define

    solid waste as garbage, refuse and

    other solid material derived from any

    agricultural, commercial, consumer

    or industrial operation or activity that

    is intended to be introduced into the

    disposal process within a reasonable

    time after acquisition. In other words,material that is acquired with an intent

    to resell or store it does not qualify as

    solid waste.

    Solid waste must be either used

    material or residual material and

    cannot be raw material (other than

    scraps), solids within liquids (such as

    silt) or liquid waste, precious materials

  • 8/8/2019 pub2818_1

    2/4

    2 Number 934 | September 21, 2009

    Latham & Watkins | Client Alert

    or hazardous or radioactive material.

    Solid waste is used material if it has

    previously been used as an agricultural,

    commercial, consumer or industrial

    product or as a component of any

    such product. Used tires, discardednewspapers and magazines, and old

    cardboard boxes certainly qualify as

    used material.

    Residual material is any residual

    byproduct or excess unused raw material

    (scrap) resulting from the production of

    any agricultural, commercial, consumer

    or industrial product but only if such

    material (i) constitutes less than 5

    percent of the total material introduced

    into the production process and (ii) has

    a fair market value lower than that ofany product made in the production

    process. Tree bark derived from a

    logging operation or waste coal from a

    coal mining operation are examples of

    residual material.

    Qualifying Disposal Process

    The Proposed Regulations establish

    three categories of qualifying solid

    waste disposal processes: (i) final

    disposal process, (ii) energy conversion

    process and (iii) recycling process. TheTreasury Department has made it clear

    that these categories are intended to be

    applied broadly so as to accommodate

    future innovation and technology. Unless

    otherwise restricted by the Proposed

    Regulations, a solid waste disposal

    process may employ any biological,

    engineering, industrial or technological

    method.

    In this regard, the final disposal category

    is generally limited to use of a landfill,

    incineration without useful energygeneration and permanent containment.

    The energy conversion category

    includes any thermal, chemical or other

    process that converts solid waste into

    synthesis gas, heat, hot water, steam

    or other useful energy. A recycling

    process is defined as any process that

    reconstitutes, transforms or otherwise

    converts solid waste into a useful

    product.

    Identifying Qualifying Costs

    The Proposed Regulations apply rules

    similar to the existing Regulations in

    identifying costs that can and cannot

    be financed with tax-exempt bonds.In general, costs can be financed with

    tax-exempt bond proceeds from the

    beginning of the disposal process

    up to the point that the first useful

    product is produced, whether or

    not such product is actually sold for

    use. For example, costs incurred with

    respect to an energy conversion process

    that produces useful steam energy

    from used tires would qualify for tax-

    exempt financing, but costs incurred

    in turning the steam into electricity

    and transmitting it to the grid maynot qualify. In determining the point

    at which the first useful product is

    produced, the Proposed Regulations

    provide that operational constraints

    that affect the point at which a useful

    product can reasonably be separated

    from a continuous or integrated

    production process will be considered.

    Costs incurred for portions of a facility

    that are functionally related and

    subordinate to the solid waste disposal

    facility, or that perform preliminaryfunctions, also qualify for tax-exempt

    financing. For example, the cost of

    a conveyor belt and storage bin for

    qualifying solid waste generally will be

    treated as part of the qualifying solid

    waste disposal facility.

    For mixed-use facilities facilities

    that are used for both a qualified solid

    waste disposal function and a non-

    qualified function only the costs

    allocable to the qualified solid waste

    disposal function qualify for tax-exemptfinancing. Taxpayers generally are

    permitted to allocate the costs between

    a qualified solid waste disposal function

    and a non-qualified function using any

    reasonable method.

    To the extent a qualified solid waste

    disposal process uses both solid waste

    and non-solid waste materials, only a

    percentage of the costs of the property

  • 8/8/2019 pub2818_1

    3/4

    3 Number 934 | September 21, 2009

    Latham & Watkins | Client Alert

    are eligible for tax-exempt financing,

    unless at least 65 percent of the input

    (by weight or volume) is qualifying solid

    waste. If the annual percentage of solid

    waste used in the disposal process is

    65 percent or more, all qualifying costsof the property can be financed on a

    tax-exempt basis. The 65 percent to 35

    percent ratio of qualifying input to non-

    qualifying input must be satisfied each

    year the bonds are outstanding.

    If less than 65 percent of the input

    material is qualifying waste, only a

    percentage of the costs equal to the

    average annual percentage of qualifying

    input (by weight or volume) qualifies

    for tax-exempt financing. This rule is

    illustrated in the Proposed Regulationsby an example in which 40 percent of

    the input to an incinerator generating

    steam for electricity is coal (presumably

    not waste coal) and 60 percent of the

    input is qualifying solid waste. In the

    example, the taxpayer is permitted to

    finance 60 percent of the costs of the

    energy conversion process on a tax-

    exempt basis. If only 35 percent of the

    input to the incinerator had been coal,

    all such costs would qualify.

    Other Requirements

    In addition to the specific requirements

    applicable to solid waste disposal

    facilities in the Proposed Regulations,

    tax-exempt bonds issued to finance

    such facilities must meet a host of other

    requirements applicable to private

    activity bonds as defined in the Internal

    Revenue Code. These requirements

    include:

    A maximum bond term the

    weighted average maturity of thebonds cannot exceed 120 percent

    of the average reasonably expected

    economic lives of the financed

    facilities;

    Restrictions on acquisitions of existing

    property;

    Public approval requirements ( i.e., a

    public hearing and approval from the

    issuer of the bonds);

    Bond volume cap each state has a

    volume cap that limits the principal

    amount of private activity bonds that

    can be issued annually by that state;

    and

    Cap on bond-financed issuance costs

    no more than 2 percent of the bond

    proceeds can be used to finance the

    issuance costs.

    If you have any questions about this

    Client Alert, please contact one of the

    authors listed below or the Latham

    attorney with whom you normally

    consult:

    Bob Goldman

    (312) 876-7641

    [email protected]

    Chicago

    Ursula Hyman

    (213) 891-7906

    [email protected]

    Los Angeles

  • 8/8/2019 pub2818_1

    4/4

    4 Number 934 | September 21, 2009

    Latham & Watkins | Client Alert

    Client Alert is published by Latham & Watkins as a news reporting service to clients

    and other friends. The information contained in this publication should not be

    construed as legal advice. Should further analysis or explanation of the subject

    matter be required, please contact the attorney whom you normally consult. A

    complete list of our Client Alerts can be found on our Web site at www.lw.com.

    If you wish to update your contact details or customize the information you receive

    from Latham & Watkins, please visit www.lw.com/LathamMail.aspx to subscribe to

    our global client mailings program.

    Abu Dhabi

    Barcelona

    Brussels

    Chicago

    Doha

    Dubai

    Frankfurt

    Hamburg

    Hong Kong

    London

    Los Angeles

    Madrid

    Milan

    Moscow

    Munich

    New Jersey

    New York

    Orange County

    Paris

    Rome

    San Diego

    San Francisco

    Shanghai

    Silicon Valley

    Singapore

    Tokyo

    Washington, D.C.