Upload
thanh
View
22
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
PST Prototyping September 2002. Pixel Support Tube (PST) Overview. Prototypes Barrel Tubes Forward Tubes Heater Bonding Fabrication Wrinkling- our nemisis Flat Plate Compaction 1D and 2D Wrapping Part Size Prediction Discussion and results. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
PST PrototypingSeptember 2002
2
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Pixel Support Tube (PST) Overview
• Prototypes– Barrel Tubes– Forward Tubes– Heater Bonding
• Fabrication– Wrinkling- our nemisis– Flat Plate Compaction– 1D and 2D Wrapping
• Part Size Prediction– Discussion and results
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Introduction to the Barrel and Forward Tube Prototypes
4
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Barrel Tubes
• 6 Ply QI Laminate– Possible 2 Hoop plies for
stiffness– Insulating Glass Mat inner layer– Heater co - bonded to outer
layer
• YSH-80 Carbon Fiber• Made using a steel mandrel
Heaters AL, Kapton0 (Optional) YSH-80 Carbon0 YSH-80 Carbon
60 YSH-80 Carbon-60 YSH-80 Carbon-60 YSH-80 Carbon60 YSH-80 Carbon
0 YSH-80 Carbon0 (Optional) YSH-80 Carbon
Mat Glass
6 ply quasi-Isotripic
5
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Forward Tubes
• 8 Ply Hybrid Laminate
– 2 extra Hoop plies are YSH-80 for stiffness
– Insulating Glass Mat inner layer
– Heater Co-bonded to outer layer
• YSH-80 Carbon Fiber / AQII Quartz
• Made using steel mandrel
– Can be ‘push’ released from mandrel
Heaters AL, Kapton0 YSH-80 Carbon0 YSH-80 Carbon
60 AQII Quartz-60 AQII Quartz-60 AQII Quartz60 AQII Quartz
0 YSH-80 Carbon0 YSH-80 Carbon
Mat Glass
8 ply Hybrid
6
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Heater Bonding
• Heaters can be Co-bonded directly to PST during cure
– The heaters can be applied individually or as a single hoop layer
– Heaters are shingled to provide a continuous aluminum EMI shield for the barrel
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Prototype Fabrication Methods
Current and Future methods
8
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
fabrication
• Barrel and Forward PSTs can both be made the same steel Mandrel– Greatly reduces cost of tooling– increases relative accuracy between PST sections
• Layers are compacted into sheets and then rolled by hand onto the mandrel– Minimizes hand error during layup of individual ply sections– Reduces chance of wrinkling due to uneven hand compaction
using only a roller or other tool
• A special jig may be used to facilitate alignment– Reduces the angle error during layup onto the mandrel– Increases reproducibility of a layup
9
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Common Mandrel
• The low CTE of the Forward Hybrid Layup makes it possible to use the same steel mandrel for Both the Barrel and Forward PSTs.
CTE µin/in-°KMandrel Steel 12.2Barrel PST (Hybrid 8 ply) 0.63Forward PST (Carbon 6 Ply) -0.3Old Forward (Quartz 6 ply) 14.71
10
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Jigs
• A swiveling arm can serve to align the compacted ply stack onto the mandrel.
11
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
1D Ply Stacks – today’s method
• Multiple layers of Laminate are compacted onto a single stack using vacuum pressure.
– Removes trapped air– Joins layers into easy to handle
stacks– Reduces layup time– Facilitates alignment– Appropriate for 18” or smaller
PST
Layer 3
Layer 2
Layer 1
1/32” compaction gaps
Mandrel
12
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
2D Ply Stacks – tomorrow’s method
• This Stacking method provides the most continuous fiber for a larger mandrel.
– Precision built into the stack during formation
– Simple wrapping method reduces errors
– Can be used for any length PST
0 degree
60 degree
-60 degree
-60 degree(2nd layer
13
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Wrinkling
• Wrinkling will only occur in certain conditions, and can be avoided by using certain fabrication methods
– Compacting each stack of plies flat, and then on the mandrel
– Rolling the ply stacks onto the mandrel under tension
– Using the common procedure of waiting until the laminate has reached flow temperature to pressurize the autoclave
BAD
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
PST Diameters
Prediction and errors
15
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Prediction of PST Diameters
• TO predict PST Diameters one must know:
– CTEs of all involved materials• All known, measured, calculated,
or estimated
– Mandrel Diameters at room temperature
• Measured
– Laminate properties and thicknesses
• Calculated and Measured
– Gel temperature of Laminate• Known range
Chart of CTE for different fibers and heater designs using preliminary CN and Quartz Data
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
M55j M46j M35j YSH50 YSH80 CN60 CN80 Quartz
Fiber Material
CT
E (
pp
m/F
)
w/o 50um Glue, w 50um Al
w 50um Glue, w 50um Al
w/o 50um Glue, w 100um Al
16
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Calculated or Known CTEs for various Laminates and Materials used in Size Predictions
Barrel Shell YSH80 798 -1.6 QI 134 0.65 0.650Forward Shell (all glass) AQII 84 6.4 QI 23 14.71 0.650Forward Shell (hybrid) AQII/YSH80 84/798 6.4/-1.6 Axial 24 13.49 0.650Forward Shell (hybrid) AQII/YSH80 84/798 6.4/-1.6 Hoop 135 0.72 0.650Flanges/Mount Pads CN60 557.9 -1.49 QI 113 -0.17 N/A
Rails CN60 79.7 -1.49 Axial 111 -0.21 1.005Hoop Stiffeners CN60 79.7 -1.49 Hoop 132 -0.51 0.852Mount Flexures Titanium N/A N/A Isotropic 116 9.20 N/A
DirectionLaminate
E (GPa)Laminate CTE
(ppm/K)Thickness
(mm)Laminate Fiber Fiber E (GPa)
Fiber CTE (ppm/K)
Material CTE µin/in-°K
Mandrel Steel 12.26061 Aluminum 23.6
17
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Prediction of DiameterSimplified Example
• Prediction– Mandrel Diameter, CTEs, and Gel
temp are assumed Known.• Gel temp range is known so
calculation in performed for a variety of actual gel temperatures
– Mandrel O.D. at temperature is predicted
– Thickness of release layer is added– PST I.D. at temperature is inferred to
be the same– PST I.D. at room temperature is
predicted
• Measurement– PST O.D. and thickness are measured
• Error Measurement– Error is calculated as the difference
in predicted and measured I.D.
Mandrel Cold Mandrel HotTemperature ( C ) 27 121Diameter (in) 17.914 17.949
PST inner diameter Hot
PST inner diamter Cold
Temperature ( C ) 121 27Diameter (in) 17.949 17.950
Measured PST outer diameter
PST inner diamter
Temperature ( C ) 27 27Diameter (in) 17.990 17.949
ER
RO
RPrediction Error 0.001
PR
ED
ICT
ION
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T
18
ATLAS Pixel Detector
t. Stillwater LBNLSeptember 2002
Average PST Diameter Absolute Error With Varying Gel Temperature Assumptions
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
0.0035
0.004
90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125
Degrees C
Av
era
ge
Dia
me
ter
Pre
dic
tio
n
Err
or
(in
)
PST Diameter Precision
• 13 Measurements were taken using this method– The results were
tabulated assuming 100, 110, or 121 degree gel temperature.
– Max average error: +/- 0.004 in (100 microns)
All Error Data:
Assumed Gel Temperature Mean Standard Deviation100 -0.0023 0.0028110 0.0002 0.0027121 0.0030 0.0030
Calculations in inches