Provinces Other Than BC Factum Searchabke

8/19/2019 Provinces Other Than BC Factum Searchabke

1/40

C

ourt

F i l

e

No.

A-

293-15

F

EDE

RALCOUR

T O

F

AP

PEAL

B

ETWE

EN:

T

he Ca

nadian

Cop

yright

Li

censin

g

A

gency

Operat

ing a

s

Acces

s

Copyr

ight)

A

p p l i

c a n t

and

H

er

Majes

ty T

he Quee

n

n

Righ

t

of

the

Provi

nce

of

Albe

rta,

Her

Majes

ty T

he

Qu

een

n

Ri

ght o

f the

Pro

vince

of

Man

itob a,

T

he

Province of

New

Brunswick,

Her

Maj

esty

i n

Right

of

Newf

oundl

and

an

d

Lab

rador,

H

er

Majest

y The

Queen

n

Righ

t

of

t

he

Provin

ce

of

Nov

a

S

cotia,

Th

e Go

vernm

ent

f

Nuna

vut,

H

e

r

Majes

ty Th

e Qu

een

n

Ri

ght

of

t

he P

rovinc

e

of P

rince

Edw

ard I

sland,

H

er

M

ajest

y The

Qu

een

n

Rig

ht

of

the

Provi

nce of

Sask

atche

wan

Gove

rnmen

t of Yuko

n

and

H

er

Maj

esty

T

he

Quee

n n

Right

of

the

Prov

ince

of

B r i t i

s h

C

olumb

ia

R

espo

ndents

R

ESPO

NDEN

TS

REC

ORD

i t h

t

he

e

xcepti

on o

f Her

Majest

y

the

Quee

n

n Ri

ght

of

the

Provi

nce of

B r i t i

s h

C

olumbi

a)

V

OLU

ME

O

F

I

MEMO

RAND

UM

OF

FACT

AND

LAW

F

eb ruar y 19,

2016

Wanda

Noel

B

a

r r i s t e r

S o

l i c i t o

r

5 96

White

wood Avenue

tt

awa,

ON

K4M

C7

T

e l

613)

7

94.117

1

—

and —


2/40

-2-

J .

Aidan

O ' N e i l l

A

r i l

Thomas

F

asken

Martineau

DuMoulin LLP

B

a r r i s t e r s

S o l i c i t o r s

e t c a l f e

S t r e e t , S u i t e 1300

ttawa,

ON

K1

P

L

T

e l :

613)

36.3882

S

o l i c i t o r s t o

the

Respondents w i t h

the

e

x c e p t i o n o f Her

Majesty the

Queen n

R

i g h t o f the Province

o f

B r i t i s h

Columbia)


3/40

TAB

LE

OFCO

NTEN

TS

T

ab

D

escrip

tion

P

age

OLUME

A

tat

ement

of

oyalti

es

t o

be

Coll

ected By

c

c e s s C op

yright

o r

1

he

R e

progr

aphic

R e

produc

tion, n

C

anada

,

of

Wo r

ks n i

t s

R

e p e

r t o i r e

P r o v i

n c i a l an

d

T e r r i t o

r i a l

Gov

er nm e

nts —

2

005-20

14},

De c

i s i o n o

f

the Board ,

C opyr

ight Boa

rd

o f C ana

d a , May 2

,

2

15

V

o~unnE

C

~

7

A

f f i d a v i

t

of

N

ina Lav

oie, dated

Augus

t

14,

2 1

5

1

E x

h i b i t

A:

Stand

ard

f f i l

i a t i o n Ag r

e ement

s an d

Form

s

1

85

2

E

x h i b i t

B:

B

r i t i s h

C ol um

bia s

S

tateme

nt

f

Cas

e

21 1

3

E x h i b i

t E:

Co

pyrigh

t

Bo

ar d s

N

o t i c e ,

Nov

ember

2

6, 2 1

2

316

4

E x h

i b i t F

:

A

c c e s s

C o p y r i g

h t s

S

ubmiss

ion,

Ja

nuary

1

8,

2 13

3

7

5

E x

h i b i t

G:

C o

nsorti

um s

Submi

ssion,

Marc h

28,

2 13

3

32

6

E x h i b i

t H:

B r i t i s h C o

lumbia

s

Su

bmissi

on,

March

29,

2

13

344

7

E x h i b i t

Acc

ess Copy

right

s

Sub

missio

n,

p r i l

26,

2

13

353

8

E x h i b

i t

K: Memo

rand

um

of Under

standi

ng, Febru

ary 17

, 2 0 1 1

37

4

9

E x

h i b i t L

:

Copyri

ght

B

oard s

O

rd er,

M

ay ,

2

13

385

1

E x

h i b i t

N: C o

nsorti

um s

St

ateme

nt

o f

C a

s e ,

Augus

t

31,

2 12

388

A i d a v

i t of

Ni

na Lavoie

,

dated

J

anuary

18

, 2 16

E

x h i b i t X

: CD

onta

ining a

n Excel

s

preads

heet,

dated

Ju ne

4 01

1 7,

2

13

E

x h i b i t

Y:

CD

onta

ining a

n Exce

l

sp

readsh

eet,

dated

J

u l y

2

2,

2 13

A

f fi d

a v i t

o

f J e n n i f

e r

L a

mantia

,

dated

J u l y

13,

2

15

1

E x

h i b i t A

:

Copyr

ight

B

oard s

O

rd er,

May ,

2

14

4 2


4/40

Tab

De

script

ion

Pag

e

E x h i b

i t

B:

4

4

Ac c e s s

C o p y r i g h t s

Submission,

Ju n e 6, 201 4;

r i t

i s h

Col

umbia

s

Submis

sion,

June

6,

2

014;

Cons

ortium

s

Submis

sions,

Ju

n e

6,

2014;

Acc

es s

C o p

y r i g h t

s Submi

ssion,

Jun

e

13, 2014

;

r i t i s

h

Colu

mbia s

Su

bmiss

ion,

J

un e 13,

20

14;

and

Conso

rtium

s Sub

missio

ns, Ju

n e 13 ,

2

14

3

E x h

i b i t C :

Copyri

ght Board

s

Ord

er, u l y

21

,

2

14

456

4

E

x h i b i t

D :

e t

t e r fr

om

A

c c e s s

o

p y r i g h

t ,

Aug

ust 28,

2 14

45

8

5

E x h i b

i t E:

E

mail

f

rom the Co

nsort

ium a

nd

r i

t i s h

Col

umbia

,

46

6

S

e p t e m be r

2,

2 14

E x

h i b i t

F:

C

opyrig

ht Board

s

R u l i n g ,

Se

p t e mb

e r

11,

2 1

4

4

68

E

A

f f i d a v i

t o f J e n n i

f e r Laman

tia,

da ted

Decem

ber

,

2

15

1

x h i b i

t

J :

r i t i s h

Co

lumbia

s

S

tateme

nt

f

O b j e

c t i o n ,

J u l y

6,

4

7

009

x h i b i t

K: Copyri

ght Boa

rd s

D i r

e c t i v e o n

P

roced

ure,

Ma r c

h

2,

476

010

3

x h i b i t

M:

Ac c e s s

C o p y r i g h t s

Statement

of

C a s e ,

May

,

488

0

12

F

xc

erpt from

t h e

T r a

n s c r i p

t

fr

om

the

Ac

c e s s Cop

yrigh t

5

Pr

o v i n c i a

l and T e r r i t o r

i a l

Gover

n m e n t

s a

r i f f s

2005

-2009 a n d

010-20

14 pro

ceeding

,

No

vembe

r 1,

20

12, Vo l

um e

V

OLUME

G

emor

andum

of Fa

ct and

La

w

5 5

V

OLUM

E V

H

o

o k

of u

t h o r i t

i e s

1

ect

ion

7Q.18

of th

e Copy r

ight

c t ,

RSC

9

85,

c -

42.

l b

e r t a

(Educ

ation)

v

C

anadi

an

Copy r

ight

Licens

ing

A g e n c

y

c c

e s s C o p y

r i g h t

, [20

12]

S

CR

4

5.


5/40

T

ab De

scriptio

n

P

age

l b e r

t a ( I n f o

r m a t i o n and

Priva

cy

Co

mmissio

ner)

v

A l b e r

t a

T

each

ers s

s o c i a t i o

n , [2011 ]

CR 54.

4

aker

v

Canada

M i n i s t

e r of

i t i z e n s h i

p

and

I m m

i g r a t i o n )

,

[

199

9]2

SC

R 17.

5 .

A.

.

A. .

v

Sand

holm Holdin

gs

L t d .

[

1955] E

x

CR

44.

6 a

nada

Attorney

G

eneral)

v Mavi

, 2011

] S

CR

04.

7

anada

Canadia

n

Huma

n

ig

hts C

ommissi

on) v

Can

ada

tto

rney

Gene

ral),

2011

] CR 71

8

a n ad

i an As

sociatio

n of

Br oad

casters v

Societ

y

o

f

omp os e r s ,

Authors

and

M u s i c

Publishers

of

Canada , 2Q 6

F

C

A 37.

9

ana

dian

Broad

casting Corp.

v

SO

DRAC

3 n c .

2 15

SCC

7.

VOLUM

EV

H

o o

k of

A u t h

o r i t i e s

( c o n t

d )

1

C

CH

an adian

L

t d . v L

aw oci

ety of

Upper

Ca n ada,

20

04]

S

CR

39

.

1

1

Ci n

ar Corpora

tion

v

Rob

inson,

2013]

3

CR

168.

1

2

Co unci

l of

Canadia

n s

Wi

th

D i

s a b i l i t i e s

v VIA

Rail

Ca

nada

n c .

[2007

] S

CR

50.

1

3

Duns mu

ir

v

I V

ew

B

runswick

, 2008]

SC

R

9

V

OLUME VI

1

4

McLe

an v

B r i t i s h

Columb

ia S e c u r

i t i e s C

ommissio

n),

2013]

3

SC

R

95.

1

5 N

eighbour

ing

Righ

ts

C o l l e c t i v

e

of

Cana

da

v

So cie

ty

of

ompo

se rs, Authors

a

nd M u s i c

Publ

ishers

of

C a n a d

a ,

2

044]

1

FCR

0

3.

16 N e t

f l r x I n

c . v

So

ciety

of

Co

mpos e r s

,

Author

s

and

Musi

c

b l i s h e r

s

of

Can ada

, 2 15 FCA 89.


6/40

Ta

b

Des

cripti

on

7

Nichol

son v Hald

imand-

Norfol

k

Re

gional

P o l i

c e

ommi

ssione

rs,

197

9] SCR

11.

8 Re

: Sound

v

F

itness

n d u s t r

y

Counci

l

of

C a n a d

a , 2015]

FCR 7

0.

9

Socie

ty

o

f

C o m

p o s e r

s ,

Aut

hors

and

Mu si c

Pub

lisher

s

of

C

a n a d a

v B e l

l C a n a d a

, 2

1 FC

A

39.

S

ociety

of

C o m p o s

e r s ,

Auth or

s

an

d Music

Publi

shers

of

Ca

n a d a

v

Cana

da

Cop

yright

Board

),

19

93]

FCJ

o 137.

Page

Soci

ety

of

C o m

p o s e r

s ,

Au

thors

and

Mu s

ic

P

ublish

ers of

a n a

d a v C

a nadi

an Assn.

of

n t

e r n e t P

rovide

rs,

[2004

]

S

CR

27.


7/40

~ i ~

I l

C

o u r t

F i l e

N

o.

A-29

3-15

F

EDE

RAL

C

OUR

T O

FA

PP

EAL

B

ETW

EEN

:

T

he

Cana

dian

Cop

yrig

ht Lic e

nsin

g Ag

enc y

Op

erat

ing

as Ac c

e s s

Co

pyri

ght )

A

p

p l i c

a n t

-

a

nd

H

er

Maj es

ty

The

Q

uee

n

n

Rig

ht

o f

th

e

P

rovi

nc e of

A l b e

r t a

Her

M

ajes

ty

The

Q

uee

n

n

Ri

ght

of

th

e Pr

ovin

ce

of

Man

itob

a,

T

he Pro

vinc

e of N

ew

run

swic

k,

Her

Ma

jes t

y i n Ri

ght

of

Newf

ound

land

an

d Labr

ador

,

Her

Ma

jes t

y

T

he

Qu

een

n

Rig

ht

o

f

th

e Prov

inc e

of

Nov a

S c o

t i a

T

he Go

v er n

men

t

f Nun

avut

,

Her

Maje

s ty

The

Que

en

n R

ight o

f

t

he P

rovi

nc e

of

Pri

nce

Edw

ar d I s l a n

d

He

r

Maje

sty T

he

Quee

n n

Rig h

t o

f the

P

rov i

nce

of

Sa

s ka

t c he

wan,

ov er

nmen

t

of Yuko

n,

an

d

H

e

r

Ma

jest

y Th

e Qu

een

n Ri

ght

of

t

he

Pr

ov in

ce

of

r i t i s

h

Colu

mbia

R

es p

onde

nt s

M

E

MO

RAN

DUM

OF

FA

CT

A

ND

LAW

F T

HE RE

SPO

NDE

NTS

it

h th

e e

xc ep

tion

of

Her

Maj

esty

The

Que

en

n R

ight

of

th

e

P

rovi

nce of

r i t i s

h C

olum

bia

D

a t e :

Feb

ruar

y 1

9,

201

6

Wan

da

Noel

Ba r r

i s t e

r

~

S o l

i c i t o

r

5

96 Whit

ewo

od

Av

e.

awa

,

O

N

K

M

C

7

Te l :

613)

94.

1171

-and-


8/40

~

J

.

Ai

dan

O

N e

i l l

A

r

i l

h

o

ma

s

as

ke

n

M

ar

tin

ea

u

Du

Mo

u li

n

L

LP

B

a r r

i s t

e r s

S o

l i c

i t

o r s

e t c a l f e

S t r e e t ,

S u i t e

1300

a

wa

,

O

N K1

P

L

Te l

61

3)

36

.3

88

2

S

o l

i c i

t o r

s t

o t

he

Res

po

nd

en

t s

w

i t h

th

e

e

x c

e p t

i o

n

o f

He

r

Maj

es

ty

th

e

Qu

ee

n n

Ri g

h t

o

f

h e

P

rov

in

ce of

r

i t i

s h

Co

lu

mb

ia

)


9/40

T

BL

E

O

F

CON

TENT

S

Pa r

t

—

F CT

S

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . 1

. .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . .

T

he

Copyr

ight Boar d

s

Decisi

on a n d

the D

e l e t i o

n

P r o v i s

i o n

.

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . 1

The

P a r t i e

s '

Su

bmiss

i o n s

o n

the

D e l

e t i o n

P r o

v i s i o n

. . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . 2

P RT

—

ISSUE

S . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. 7

P

RT

—LE

G L

SUB

MISSI

ONS

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . 7

)

hat s

th

e

a p p r o p r

i a t e

st

andard

o f

review

w

hen

asse

ssin g

t

he

A p p l i c

a n t ' s

j

u

d i c i a l rev ie

w

a p p

l i c a t i o

n ?

. .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . 7

i)

he

D un

smuir

,

l b e r t a

a n d CC

H ec i

sions

. . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . 8

i i

The

Rece

n t

Re:

Soun d

,

e t f l i x

a n

d C

BC ecis

i on s

. . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . 9

) id

th

e B

o a r d exc

eed

t s

j u r i

s d i c t i o

n

by

d e c

i d i n g not

o

i n c l u

d e the

D e

l e t i o n

P

r o v

i s i o n

a n d

r e f

u s i n g t o

c e r

t i f y

a

a r i f f

i n r e l a t

i o n t o

d i g i

t a l

c o p y

i n g?

. . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . 1 0

i

}

he

Boar d

s

S t a t u

t o r y

Po w

er s

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . 1 0

i i

The

S

OC N

B e

l l Canad

a Dec

ision

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . 1 1

)Wa

s he

A p p l i c

a n t

deni

ed

p r

o c e d u r

a l f a i r n

e s s by

the

Board

s

p r o c

ess

e

l a t i n g

to

i g i t a

l

cop

ies,

a n d

by

th

e

e x c l u

s i o n

of

i v e

copy

i ng

event

s

h a t

exc ee

d ed

the

c

opyi

ng

l i m

i t

set

ou

t n the pro p

osed

a r i

f f ?

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . 1 3

i)

he

p p l i c a n

t ' s

Cons

istent

o

s i t i o n

o

n

the

D

e l e t i o n

P r o v i s

i o n

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . 1 3

i i

Th

e

B o a r

d

i s

Master

of t s

Ow

n

r

o cedur

es

. . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . 1 5

i i i The

C o n t e

n t

o f

he

Duty

of Fai r

ness

s

C onte

xtual

. . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . 1 5

v )

o t i c e

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . 1 6

v)

he

B

oard s

Ref us

al

o

Ac c

ept

New

v

i dence

. . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

1 7

v

i

Th

e Five

Exc l

uded

C o p

y i n g

E

vents

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . 1

8

id t

he

Co p

y r i ght

B o

a r d

p r o p e

r l y

ev

aluate

u b s t

a n t i a l

c o p y i n

g ?

. . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . 1 9

i)

o a r d

Pr

oceedi

ng i s

n

ot Co

pyrigh

t Inf

ringem

en t

i t i g a

t i o n

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . 1 9

i

i

S

e t t i n g

a

B r i g h

t L i n

e Rul

e

s

Rea

s o n a bl

e . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . 2 1

i

i i

T

he

Creatio

n of

a

Sa

fe

Harbou

r

. . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . 2 2


10/40

) W

a

s

he

B

oar

d'

s a

p p l

i c

a t i

o n

o

f

a i

r d

ea

lin

g re

as

on

abl

e?

. .

. . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . .

2 2

)

a

i r

De

al

ing

an

d

the

B

ur

de

n o

f P

ro

of

. .

. . . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

2 3

i

h

e

A

ss

es

sm

en

t

o

f

Ea

ch

Fa

irn

es

s

Fa

cto

r I

nd

ep

en

de

ntl

y

. .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . .

2 6

i i

he

opyright Board

and

the

Amount

f the

Dealing

Factor

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 7

v)

he

op

yri

gh

t

Bo

ar

d

a

nd

th

e

C

ha

rac

te

r

of

th

e

e

a l

i n

g

Fa

cto

r . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . 2

8

P

RT

V —

OR

D

ER

SO

U

GH

T

.

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . .

. . . .

. . . .

2 9

~

~

~


11/40

PART

—F

ACT

S

T

he C

opyr

ight

Boa

rd's

Dec

isio

n an

d

the

De

leti

on

Pro

visi

on

1 .

On

a

y 2

,

201

5,

he

Co py

righ

t

Bo

ard

(

the

Bo

ard

)

s s u

e d

i t s

t a r i f

f d e c i s

i o n

e

s t

a b l i

s h i n g

th

e r o

y a l t y

r

a t e s

t o

be

p a

i d t o

Acc

ess

Copy

righ

t

t h

e A p p

l i c a

n t ' )

pu

rsua

nt

o

two

pro

pose

d

a r i f

f s

i n

resp

ect

o f

the

co

pyin

g o

f p u

b l i s

h e d

work

s n th

e

A p

p l i c

a n t ' s

r e

p e r t

o i r e

by

p r o v i

n c i a l

and

e r r i

t o r i a l

go

ver

nmen

ts

d u

r i n g

t h e

2

005

-200

9

t h e

F i r

s t

T

a r i f

f )

and

2010

-20

14

the

Se

cond

T a r i

f f ' )

t a r i f f

p e r i

o d s . '

2

T

he

p p l i

c a n t '

s F i

r s t

T a r i f

f

d

i d

n o

t

cove

r

th

e

m

aki

ng o f

d i

g i t a l

c o p

i e s .

T

he

Ap p

l i c a n

t ' s

Seco

nd

T a

r i f f , ho w

ever

,

u t h

o r i z

e d ,

i

n t e r

a l

g a , t h

e

mak

ing

and

d i

s t r i b

u t i o n

o f

d

i

g i t a l

c

opie

s

u nde

r e

r t a i n

c o n

d i t i

o n s .

O

ne

o n d

i t i o

n r e q

u i r e d

g

over

nmen

t

i

c e n s

e e s ,

whe

n

the

y wer

e

no lon

ger

cov

ered

b

y

t

he

pr

opos

ed

a r i f

f , t o

cea s

e

o

u

se

thes

e i

g i t a l

c

o p i e s ,

and

t o

d e l

e t e

them

f

rom t

h e i r

com

pu te

r

ha

rd

d r

i v e s

a

nd

o t

h e r

e

l e c t

r o n i c

medi

a.

T

h i s

c o n

d i t i

o n

r e

l a t i

n g

t o

d i g i t a

l copi

es

s r e f

e r r e d

t o as

the

D e l e t

i o n

P r o

v i s i o

n .

2

3

The

Boa

rd

issu

ed

i t

s

t a r i f

f d

e c i s i

o n

on

ay

2, 20

15,

o l l o

w i n g

a

l e n g

t h y

p

r

ocee

ding

. The

p

a r t i

e s t o

t h i s

proc

eedi

ng

we

re

t

he

A p p

l i c a n

t

a

nd, a

s

e p a

r a t e

l y

repre

sent

ed

p a

r t i e s

, a

C

onso

rtiu

m

com

pose

d

o

f v

a r i o

u s

p r

o v i n

c i a l

an

d e r r i t

o r i a l

g

over

nme

nts

t

h e Co

nsor

tium

) an

d

th

e G

over

nme

nt

f

B

r i t i s

h

Col

umbi

a

B r i t

i s h

Co l u

m b i a

) .

This

M

emo

ran

dum

o f

F

act an

d

Law

s

s

ubmi

tted

t

o t h

i s

Hono

urab

le Cour

t

o

n b e

h a l f

o f the

C

on so

rti u

m.

4 On

Mar

ch

2

, 201

0,

h e

Board

i s s u e d

a

D i r e c t i v e

on

Procedure

o

govern

the

condu

ct

f

t h i s

proc

eedi

ng.

3

The

B

oard

's D i

r e c t

i v e on

Pro

cedu

re

r e q u

i r e d

,

i

n t e r

a l i a ,

i n

p

ar

agra

ph 5

i v )

,

t

h a t ea

ch

p a r

t y

t o

t

h i s pr

ocee

din g

i

l e a

Stat

eme

nt

f C

ase h

a t

wo ul

d

ncl

ude l l o

f

the

e

vid

en ce

u

pon

wh

ich

t h a t

p a r t y

in

tend

ed

t o

r e l y

i n

ma

kin

g

t

s

ca

se o

t

he

Boar

d.

5 A

i n g l

e

p u b l i

c

h e a r

i n g

was

e l d f o r

the c e r t

i f i c a

t i o n o f

b o t

h

t

h e

F i r s

t

and

Sec

ond

T

a r i f f s

. The

hea

ring

o

ccur

red

o

ver

i g h t

d

ays

n Oc

tob

er

and

Nove

mbe

r,

Q

12.

Fo

l l o w i

n g

t

he h e a r i

n g

and

f i

n a l o

r a l

a

rgu

ment

,

t

he

Boa

rd r e

q u i r

e d

t h e

p a r t i

e s t

o

p

r o v i

d e

f

u

r t h e

r

i n

f o r m a

t i o n

and

t o

perf

orm

a d

d i t i o

n a l

a n a

l y s i

s

and

c

a l c u

l a t i o

n s . The

Bo

ard'

s

r

ecor

d

o

f

h i s

pro

ceedi

ng

w

as

co

nseq

uent

ly

not

co

mpl

eted

u n t i

l

Au

gu st

2 8

, 20

14.

6

T

he Bo

ard'

s

d e

c i s i

o n o f

ay

2,

2

15

e r t

i f i e d

an

nu a

l r o y a

l t y r

a t e s

pa

yabl

e

o

t

he A

p p l i c

a n t o

f 11.5

6¢ p

er

u l l -

t i m e

e q u

i v a l

e n t

em

pl oy

ee FT

E )

o r

the

F

i r s t T a

r i f f

and

4

9 . 7 1

¢

per

F

TE

o

r

the

Seco

nd

T a r

i f f .

B

oa

rd

D e c

i s i o n

,

Re

spond

ents

'

Re

cord,

o

l . 1 ,

T ab

A,

p

age

1 .

2

B

oard

Dec

ision

a

t

par s

151

,

Re

spon

dents

' R

ecord

, Vol 1 ,

Ta

b

A,

pa

ge

42 .

3

Boar

d's

D

i r e c t

i v e

on

Pro

cedur

e,

R

espon

den t

s' R

ec ord

,

o

l .

2

,

T a

b

E

2,

pag

e 47

6.


12/40

7.

A f t e

r

the

con

clus

ion

of

t

he

h e a

r i n

g ,

the

B

oar

d r

equ

este

d

d

e t a i

l e d

subm

iss

ion

s

f

r

o m

t

he

p

a r t i

e s

o n

t

he

D e l

e t i o

n

P r o v

i s i o

n .

Ba

s e d

o n

th

ese

su

bmi

ssio

ns,

the Bo ar

d

co n

clu

ded

t h a

t

th

e App

lica

nt d i d

n

ot h

ave

the l e

g a l

r i

g h t t o

gra

nt a

l

i c e n

c e

f

o r

the

m

ak

ing

of

i g i

t a l

copi

es

i n

th

e

a

bs e

nce

of

th

e

D

e l e t

i o n

P

r o v i

s i o n

.

4

T

he Bo

ard

al

so

f

o und

t

hat

t

he

p r o

v i s

i o n

was

n a p

p r o p

r i a

t e

and

i m

p r a

c t i c

a b l e

f o r

a

v a

r i e t

y of

d i

f f e r

e n t

rea

sons

.

As a

r e s

u l t ,

i t

de

cid

ed

n o t

t

o

i

n c l u

d e t

he

D e l

e t i o

n

P r

o v i s

i o n

i n

th

e

Se

con

d

T a r

i f f .

8

T

he

Bo

ard

f o

und

t

h a t

a

f i n a

l c e r

t i f i

e d t a r i

f f

c

ann

o t

p u r p

o r t

t o

auth

oriz

e

u s e

s

t

h a t

t h

e A

ppli

can

t cou

ld no

t

i

t s e l

f

a

u t h o

r i z e

.

Th

e

ma

k ing

of

d i g i

t a l co

pie

s

t h e r

e f o r

e w

as

n

ot

a

n

act t

h a t

coul

d f a l l

w i t h

i n

th

e s

co p

e

o f

p e r

m i t t

e d

u s

es

pur

suan

t t o

the

f i

n a l

c e

r t i f i

e d

t

a r

i f f

T

h e

Part

ies

'

Sub

mis

sio

ns

on

t

he

D

ele

tion

Pro

vis

io n

9

The

p p l

i c a

n t ,

t

he

Con

sor

tiu

m,

a

nd

B r i t

i s h

Co

lu m

bia

co

nclu

ded

a

Memorandum

o

f

Und

ers t

and

ing

da

ted Fe

brua

ry

17

, 20

11,

o

g

ove

rn

t

he

c

ond

uct

o

f

a

o i n

t

stu

dy

of

t

he

v

o lu

me

an

d

na

ture

o

f

the

c

opyi

ng

of

pu

blis

hed

wo

rk s

by

p r o v

i n c i

a l

an

d

t

e r r i

t o r i a

l

g

o v

e rn

men

t

em

p lo

ye e

s

t

he

Vo l

u me

S

t u d

y ) .6

1 0

.

T

he purp

o se

of

th

e Vo

lum

e

St

udy

w

as

o

esti

mat

e

the

ann

ual

v

o lum

e

of

c

o

mp e

ns a

ble

co py

ing

o

f pu

bli

shed

wo r

k s i n

t

he A

p p l i

c a n t

' s

r e p

e r t o

i r e

i n

ord

er t o

d e

r i v e

a

nnu

al r o

y a l t

y r a t

e s

i n

resp

ect

o

f th

e

F i r

s t

and

Se

con

d

T a r i

f f s .

1 1 .

I n

i t s

M

ay ,

201

2, Sta

tem

e nt

of

Ca

s e ,

the

A

ppl

ican

t

ch

o s e

no

t

t

o

r

e l y

o n

th

e

r

e s

u l t s

o

bta

ined

i n

the

o i n

t l y

d

esi

gne

d

Vol

ume

S

tudy

.

I

n s t e

a d ,

th

e

A

ppl

ican

t

pro

pos

ed a

t

a r i f f

metho do lo gy

t h a t

r e l i e d

on

r o y a l t y

r a t e s

i t

had

p r e v i o u s l y

n e g o t i a t e d

w i t h

the

f

ede

ral

g

o ver

nme

nt,

t

he g o v

e rn

me n

t s

of A

l b e r

t a , S

as k

at c

h ew

an

a

nd

O n t

a r i o

,

and

a

n

a

g

ree

men

t

b

e tw

ee n

Co p

ibec

(

a

r e

l a t e

d

c o p

y r i

g h t

c

o l l e

c t i v

e bas

ed i

n Qu

ebe

c

nd

the

g

o ve

rnm

ent

o f

Qu e

be c

.

1 2

.

s

a

r t o

f t s

e

v i d e

n t i a

r y m

a t e r

i a l s

, t

he Ap

plic

ant

prov

ided

cop

ies

o f i t s

st

anda

rd

a

f f

i l i a

t i o n

ag r

eem

ents

w

i t h

i t s

aut

hor

s a

nd

p u b

l i s

h e r

a

f f i l

i a t e s

.

Bot

h

type

s

o f

st

and

ard

a

g re

eme

nts

exp

ress

ly

p r

o h i b

i t e d

t

he

Ap

pli

cant

f

ro m

l i c

e n s i

n g

d i g

i t a l

co

pyi

ng

of

p

u b l

i s h e

d

wo

rks

i n

the

a

bs e

nce

of

the

D e

l e t i

o n

P r

o v i s

i o n

. '

1

3

.

I n t

h e i r

A

u gu

s t 31,

201

2,

St

ate

men

ts

of C

as e

, bo

th

t

he Con

sort

ium

an

d

B r i

t i s h

o

lumb

ia

ch o

s e t o

r e l

y o n

the

r e

s u l t

s

o f t

he

Vol

ume

S

tu d

y t o

s

uppo

rt

t h

e i r

pr

op os

ed

r

o y

a l t y

r

a t e s

. Bo

th pr

o po

sed

the

s

ame

a

r i f f

me

tho

do l

o g y

t h a

t had

b

een

a

do p

ted

by

the

Board

i n

a pr

evio

us a r

i f f

pro

ceed

ing

i

n v o

l v i n

g th

e

A p

p l i c

a n t .

T

his

i s

r e f e

r r e d

t o

a

s

the

B

oar d

D e c

i s i o

n

a t

p

ar s

16 5.

Res p

o nde

nts

'

Re

cord

,

V o l

.

1 ,

T ab

A,

p

ag e 45

.

5

Bo

ard

D

ecis

ion a

t p

ara

16

7,

R

espo

nden

ts'

Rec

ord,

V

o l .

1 ,

T a

b

A,

pag

e 4

6.

~ ~

~

6

Memo

ran

dum

f

Un d

ersta

ndin

g,

Res

po nd

ents

' R

ecor

d,

V

ol

T

ab

B8,

pa g e

3

74.

S

ta

ndar

d

A

f f i l i a

t i o n

Ag r

eeme

nt s

and

Fo r

ms, R

espo

nden

ts'

Rec

ord,

V

o l .

2 ,

T ab

B1

,

p

ag e

1

85


13/40

vol

ume

tim

es

v

a l u e

a r i f

f

met

hod

olo

gy,

pur

sua

nt

o

w

hi c

h th

e

vo

lu

me

o f

co

mp e

n s a

bl

e

c

opy

ing

s

m u

l t i

p l i e

d b

y t

he es

tim

ated

va

lue

o

f

eac

h p

ag

e

o f

a

co

pie

d wo

rk

t o d

e r i v

e the

f

i n

a l c

e r t i

f i e d

r o

y a l

t y

r

a t e

.$

1

4.

I n

i t s St at ement

of

Ca s e,

r i t i s h

Columbi a

o b j e c t e d

t o

the

D e l e t i o n P r o v i s i o n

i n

t

h e

A p

p l i

c a n t

' s

Sec

on d

T a r

i f f

B r i t

i s h

Col

umb

ia

s

ubm

itt

ed

t h

a t

r e q u

i r i

n g

d e s t

r u c

t i o

n o

f

[

i g

i t a l

] co

pie

s

wh

en

a

a r

i f f

ha

s e x p

i r e

d

i s im

pro

per

a n d

un

rea

son

abl

e.

9

B r i t

i s h

C

o l u

m b i

a ' s

p

o s i

t i o n

w

i t h

re

spe

ct

o

the

D e

l e t

i o n

P r o

v i s

i o n

wa

s

o n

s i s

t e n

t

w i t

h

i t s

S

t

ate

me n

t f

O b

j e c

t i o n

t h a t

ha

d b

een

i l e

d

w i

t h

th

e

Boa

rd

on

J u

l y

6,

2

00

9 .1 0

1

5 .

O

n

N

ove

mb

er 2

6,

2

012

,

i

mme

dia

tel

y o l

l o w

i n g

t h

e

o

r a l

evi

den

ce

p ha

s e of

h

e

p r

oc e

ed i

ng,

h

e

Boa

rd

iss

ued

a

N o t

i c e

e s t a

b l i

s h i n

g

a

i m e

t a b

l e f o

r

the

ex

c ha

n ge

o

f

s ubm

iss

ion

s

r e

l a t i

n g

t o

th

e wo

rdi

ng

a n

d a

d m i

n i s t

r a t

i v e

p r o

v i s i

o n s

co

nta

ine

d

i n

the

p p

l i c

a n t

s pro

pos

ed

a r i f f

s

Thi

s

N o t

i c e

r

equ

est

ed th

e

A

p p l

i c a

n t t o

ad

dre

ss t

he

w

o

r d i

n g

an

d

a d m

i n i

s t r a

t i v

e iss

ues

alr

ea dy

r a i s

e d

by

t h e

o b j

e c t

o r s

,

a n d

e s p e c i a l l y

those

r

ai

sed

i n

pa

rag

rap

hs 2

2

o 33

f E x h

i b i t

B C - 1

. '

~

P

ar a

gr a

phs

2

2

o

33

n

E x h

i b i

t

BC

1

r

e f e r

r e d

t o

B r i

t i s

h

Co

lum

bia

's o b j

e c t

i o n

r e g

a r d

i n g

t

he

D e

l e t i

o n

P r o v

i s i

o n .

1 6

. On

an

uar

y 18

,

2

013

,

he

A p p

l i c

a n t

r

es p

ond

ed t

o

th

e

Bo

ard

's

N

o t i c

e a r g

u i n

g

t h

a t

t

he

D

e l e

t i o n

P r

o v i

s i o n

wa

s

p p

r o p

r i a

t e

a

n d

n

ece

ss

a ry

bec

aus

e

t w

as

un

abl

e

t o

l

i c e n

s e

d

i g

i t a l

cop

yin

g

w i t

h o u

t

t h

i s

p r o

v i s i

o n .

A

cco

rdi

ng

t

o

t

he

Ap

pli

can

ts s

ubm

iss

ion

,

h e

D

e l

e t i o

n

P r o

v i s

i o n

was

a c

o n d i

t i o

n

o f

the

g r

a n t

o f

r i

g h t

s

p

r o v

i d e

d by

A

c ce

s s

Co p

yri

ght

s

a f f i l i a

t e s t

o A

c c e

s s C o

p y r

i g h

t .

1 2

1

7 .

T

he

A

p p l

i c a

n t a

l s o

a

rgu

ed

t h

a t th

e

pro

ces

s

se

t o

ut n

the

B

oar

d's

N o

t i c

e o

f

N

ovember

26,

2012,

o r

d e a l i n g

w i t h

the

a d m i n i s t r a t i v e

issues

r e l a t i n g

t o

t h e

propos ed

t

a r

i f f s

i s

no

t m

ea n

t

t o

a l

l o w

t

he

p a r t

i e s

t o

r

a i s e

iss

ues

o f

sub

sta

nce

Ra t

h e r ,

a s

s t a

t e d

i n

the

Me

mo

ran

du

m

th

e

pr

oce

ss

i s m

ea n

t

t o

a

l l

o w

th

e

p a r

t i e s

a

n d

t

he

B

oar

d t o

add

res

s

the

me

cha

n i c

s

o f

the

t

a r

i f f

on

c e

the

B

oa r

d

ha

s

de

ter

min

ed

i t s

o

v e r

a l l

s

t r u c

t u r

e . 1 3

1

8

.

O

n

Ma

r c h

28

n d 2

9,

2

013

,

e s p e

c t i

v e l y

,

t

he

Co

nso

rti

um

a n

d B r i

t i s h

Col

um

bia

f

i

l e d

t

h e i

r

r e s p

e c t

i v e

su

bmi

s s i

on

s

o

n

the

a d

m i n i

s t r

a t i

v e p r

o v i

s i o n

s

con

tai

ned

i n

t h e

p

p l i

c a n t

' s

pr

opo

sed

a r i f

f s

B

oth

the

Co

nso

rt i

um

a n

d

B

r i t i

s h

Co

lum

bi a

s

ubm

itt

ed

t h a t

t

he

D e l e t i o n P r o v i s i o n

should

be r emoved b ec a us e

o f

the

p r a c t i c a l i m p o s s i b i l i t y

o f

e

B

oa rd

De

cis

ion

a t

par

s

56,

Re

s po

nde

nt s '

Re

cord

,

o l

. 1 ,

T a b

A

,

p a g

e

17 .

9

B

C

t

at em

ent

f C

ase

t

pa

rs

2

7,

Res p

on d

en t s

'

Rec

ord,

o

l .

2 ,

T

a b 6 2

,

pa ge

222

.

1 0 B

C ta

t eme

n t

of

O

b j e c

t i o n

a

t pa

rs

14

, Res

pond

en t

s ' Rec

or d

.

V o

l .

2

, Tab

E1

,

p a

ge 4 70

.

B

oa rd

N

o t i c

e

o f

N

ove

mbe

r

2

6,

201

2,

Res

pon

dent

s ' Re

cord

,

o l

. 2

, T a b

B

3,

p a g

e

3

16 .

1

2

A c c

es s

C

opy

righ

t

Sub

mi s s

ion

o

f Ja n

ua r

y

18 ,

201

3,

R

espo

n de

n t s '

R

ecor

d,

o

l . 2

,

T a b

B

4,

p a

g e

322.

1 3

Ac c

es s C

opyr

ight

S

ubmi

s s i

on o f

J

anu

ary

18

, 2013

, Res

pon

den

ts '

Rec

ord

,

o l .

2 , T

a b 64

,

p a g

e

317

.


14/40

~

c

o

mplia

nce,

h a

t

the

A p

p l i c a

n t

had no l e g

a l

r

i g h t

t o

c o n t

r o l

the use

of

a

e g a l

l y

made

c

opy,

a

n d t

he

imp

ortan

ce

of r e a t i

n g

d i g i t

a l copi

es

n

a e c h n

o l o g i c

a l l y

n e u t r

a l

ma nn e

r.1

4

1

9.

The

Co

nsort

ium,

n

i t s

subm

issio

n, l

s o noted

t h a t

:

.

. .

t h e r

e

i

s n o

reas

on

why

s u b

s t a n t

i v e

i

ssue

s c

a n n o t

a r i s e

a s a

r e s u l

t o f

e v a l u

a t i n g

t

he

pr

opose

d

t a r

i f f ' s

w

ordin

g

and

a d m i n

i s t r a

t i v e

p

r o v i

s i o n s .

I f

the

wor

ding of

the

propo

sed

t a r i

f f i s

o v e

r l y

broa

d,

or

f

t im p

oses

l i a b i

l i t y w h

e r e

n o

n e

sh oul

d

e x i s t ,

t

hese

a

d m i n i

s t r a t

i v e

s

ubm

issio

ns

are

the

a

p p r o p

r i a t e

fo

rum

f

o r r a i

s i n g

th e

se i

s s u e s

.1 5

0

. T

he

p p l i

c a n t

r e p l

i e d t

o

the

Co

nsort

ium

and

B

r i t i s h

Colum

bia's

submi

ssion

s n

a

l

e t t

e r

t o

t

he B

oard

d

ated

A p r

i l

26,

201

3.1 6

I n t

h i s

l e t

t e r

the

A p p l i

c a n t r e i t e

r a t e d

i t

s

p

o s i t i

o n

t h a t b

e ca us

e the

D e l e t i

o n P r o

v i s i o

n

w

as a

o n d i

t i o n

of

th

e gr

ant

o f

r i g h t s

t o

i t

b y

t s auth

ors

a nd

p u b l i s

h e r

a f f

i l i a t e

s

i t

do e

s not

an

d

ca

nnot)

agre

e

o

i

t s

remo

val

f

r o m

the

i n a l c e r t i f i e d

t a r i f f .

1 . On

ay

,

2

01 4,

h

e

Boa

rd is

sued a n

Or

der

o

the

p a r t

i e s s t a t i n

g

i t s

p r

e l i m i

n a r y

view t h

a t

t

he

D e l

e t i o n

P r

o v i s i o

n shoul

d

n

ot b e

i

n c l u d

e d

i n

the

Sec

o n d

T a r

i f f .

The

Bo

a rd

a

s

ked

th

e

p a r t i

e s

t o

resp

ond t o

seve

n

q

uesti

ons

r e

l a t i n g

t o

t

he

D e l e t i

o n P r o v i

s i o n .

Th

e

f

o u r

t h

q u e s t

i o n r e l

a t e d

t o

the

e f f e

c t t h a t

the

n

o n- i n

c l u s i

o n o f the

D e l

e t i o n

P r o v

i s i o n

wo u l d

h a

ve

o n

the

comp

ensab

ility

of

i g i

t a l

c

opies

,

n c

l u d i n g

w

h et h e

r i g

i t a l

cop

ying

co u l d

b

e c

overe

d

i n

the

A p p l i

c a n t

s

Se c o

n d T a r i f f

f

the

D e l e t

i o n

P r o v

i s i o n

was

n

ot

ncl

uded.

1

8

2.

I n i

t s

Ord

er of

May

,

20

1 4,

he B

o a rd

a

l s o info

rmed

the

p a r t i e

s

o f

i t s

i

n t e n t i

o n

t o

p r o

v i d e

t h e

m w i

t h

a i s t

of

c

opyin

g

ev

ents

h a t

t

h

ad

p r e

l i m i n a

r i l y

i d e n t

i f i e d

a s

r

e p r e s

e n t i

n g

acts

o

f c

opyin

g

t h a

t

wou

ld

be c

o mpen

sa bl

e

u

nder

the

p

ropos

ed a r i f

f s

a

n d

wo u

l d

as

k

t h

e m

t

o

mak

e

c a l

c u l a t

i o n s

t

h a t w i l

l h e l p

e s

t a b l i s

h the

pe r

-FTE

r o y a

l t y . 1 9

The

Ap p l i

c a n t ,

the

Conso

rtiu

m a nd

B r i

t i s h

Co

lumbi

a had

p r e v i o

u s l y

a

gree

d

t h

a t

29 1 c

opyin

g

eve

nts

shoul

d be

rev

iewed

by

th

e Boa

rd

f o r

th

e

pur

poses

of

t s

a n a

l y s i s

r e

l a t i n g

t o

c

o m

p e n s a

b i l i t

y pur

suant

o

th

e

pr

opose

d a

r i f f s . 2 0

3. On un

e 6,

20

1 4,

the

A p p

l i c a n

t i l e

d a

e t

t e r w i t h

t

he B

oard

s e t

t i n g

out

t s l e

g a l

a r

gume

nt s

n r

espon

se

t o

the

s

e ven

que

stion

s con

tain

ed

i

n

the

Boa

rd's

O

rder of

ay

,

4

Con

so rtiu

m

a

nd

BC

Su

bmissi

ons

o f

March

2

8 a

nd 29,

2013,

R

espond

ents'

Recor

d,

V o l . 2 ,

Ta b s

B5

and

6

6, p ages

332

nd 344

.

1 5

Con

sortiu

m S

ubmiss

ion

o f Mar

ch

28

,

201 3,

Res

ponde

nts'

Reco

rd,

o l . 2 ,

Ta b 65

, pa

g e

33

2.

6

Ac c

ess C

o p y r i

g h t Submi

ssion

of

p r i l

26, 2

013,

Respo

ndent s

' Re

cord,

o l

.

2,

Ta b

B7

,

p

ag e 353

ccess

C o

p y r i g

h t

Sub

missio

n of

p r i l 26,

201 3,

Re

sponde

nts'

Reco

rd,

o l .

2 ,

T a b

B7,

pag

e

36 1.

18 Bo

ard

Order

o f

M

ay

,

2014

, Respo

ndent

s' R

ecord

,

o l . 2 ,

Tab

D

1 , pag e

40 3.

19 Boar

d

Or

der

o f

a

y

,

2014,

Re

spond

ents'

Rec

ord,

o l

.

2 ,

Ta b

D1 , p

ag e 402

.

2

0

Bo

ard

D e c i s i

o n

a t

par

as

96-98

,

Respo

ndent s

' Re

cord,

o l

. 1 ,

T a b

A

,

p a ge s

27

and

28.

X

1 2


15/40

5

0

14.

n

resp

onse

t o

the

Boa

rd's o u r

t h

ques

tion,

the

A p p l i

c a n t

r e i

t e r a t e

d i t s

J

anu a

ry

18,

013, s

ubmis

sion

t h a t

the

D e

l e t i o

n P r o

v i s i o

n

was

a

c o n

d i t i o n

of

t s

grant

of

r i g

h t s

f

rom

t s

auth

ors a

nd p u b l i

s h e r a f

f i l i a t

e s

Howe

ver,

the

A p p l i

c a n t a l s o

s t a t e

d t h

a t t had

o

b t a i

n e d

per

missi

on fr

om

i t s Boar

d of

D i r e c

t o r s t o

l i c e

n s e

d i g i t

a l

c

opyin

g w

ithou

t

the

D

e l e

t i o n

P r o v i

s i o n ,

a nd t

h a t t wou l

d

r

eques

t

ex

pres

s

per

missi

on f

rom

i t s

a f f i l

i a t e s

t o

r

em

ove

th

e

D

e l e t i

o n P r o v

i s i o n

] from

i t s

l i

c e n c e

s . 2

4.

On

u ne 6,

20

14,

h

e

Conso

rtiu m

a

lso i l

e d a

e t t e r

w i t h

the

Bo ar

d

s e t t i n

g out t

s

egal

ar

g u men

t s n re

spon

se t o

the

Boa

rd's sev

en

quest

ions.

2 2

Th

e

C

onsor

tiu m

's

p

o s i

t i o n wa

s h a

t al

thoug

h t

w

ould

p r e f e

r

t

h a t th

e

a r i f f cove

r i

g i t a l

work

s,

t

he

Ap p l i c

a n t

was

n

able t

o l i

c e n s e

d i

g i t a l c

opyin

g

wi t

hout

the

D e l

e t i o n

P r

o v i s i

o n ,

the

c

opyi n

g of

i g i t a l

w

orks

shoul

d not

be

c

onsi d

ered

co

mpen

sable

. i m i

l a r l y B r i

t i s h

C

o

lumbi

a's

s

ubmi s

sion

no

ted t

h a t

n

on - i n

c l u s i o

n of

the

D e

l e t i o

n

P r

o v i s i o

n

w

ou ld

rend

er

d

i

g i t a l co

pying

outsi

de

of the

sco

pe

of

the

Appl

icant

s l

i c e n c e

a

nd

t h e

r e f o r

e

rende

r

d

i g i t a l

copyi ng

non-compensable.

2 3

5 .

Th

e

p a r t i

e s

wer

e

p e r

m i t t e d

t o

f

i l e

re

spons

es

o

each

o t h

e r ' s

su bmi

ssi o

ns b

y way

of f u r

t h e r su

bmi s

si ons

on J

u ne 13,

20

14.

n

i t s

r

espon

se,

he

App

lican

t

s

t a t e d t h a t

t had

p

ro

posed

a

rea

sonab

le

com

promi

se n

i t s

Ju n

e 6,

2014

,

su

bmiss

ion t

h a t

reco

gnize

s

t

here i s

no

need

t

o

r e q u i r

e th

e

d e

l e t i o n

o f

d i g

i t a l co

pies

wh er

e the

re s

no u r t h e

r

n f r

i n g i n g

u

s e .

2 4

6.

I n

i t s res

pons

e t o t

he Ap

pl ica

nt

r

eg ard

ing the

Bo

ard's

o u r

t h

q

uesti

on ,

the

C

ons

ortiu

m

d

ispu t

ed

the A p p l i

c a n t '

s at

tem pt

,

n

i t s

J

u ne 6,

20

14,

su

bmiss

ion,

o

r e t r o a

c t i v e

l y

b u i l

d

i t s

r e p

e r t o i r

e

of

r i

g h t s

ar

guing

t h

a t :

t

i s

fu

ndame

ntal

ly

u n f a i

r

t o

b u i l

d

a

a r i

f f on

r i g

h t s t

h a t

a

c o

p y r i g

h t

c

o l l e c t

i v e

does

not

ha

ve.

Th

ere i s

no

way

o r

t

he B

oard

t o c e r t

i f y

a

f

a i r a n

d eq

uitab

le t a

r i f f bas

ed

o

n

r i g h t

s

t

h a t

do

n

ot y e t

e x i

s t .

l l e c

t i v e s

c

ould

simpl

y

p

ropos

e t a r i f f

s

t h a t

l

i c e n s

e

anyth

ing a

nd

ev e r y

t h i n g

the

y

ca n t h

i n k

o f a

nd the

n

go

t o

r i g

h t s-h

ol der

s f o r

p

ermi

ssion

aft

erwar

ds

i

the

y get

a

favou

rable

r

o y a l t

y

r a t

e c e r t

i f i e d

b

y

the

Board

. This

s a n

u n f a i r

w

ay

o

proc

eed.

2 5

7 .

Th

e Con

sorti

u m al

so n

oted

i n

i

t s

su bm

i ssi o

n

t h a t

the

A p p l i

c a n t

h a d

not i l e

d

a ny

e v

i denc

e of

per

missi

on t o l i c e n

s e

d i g i t

a l copy

ing

wi th

out the

D e l e

t i o n

P r o

v i s i o

n ,

t h

a t t

he

time

o r

i n t r o d u c i n g

new

vi dence

wa s]

ong

p a s t ,

a nd

t h a t

the Applicant could

h ave

2 Acce

ss Co

pyrigh

t

S

u bm i s

si on

of

Ju ne

6

,

20

14 , Res

ponde

nts'

Reco

rd,

o

l .

2 .

Ta b

D2

,

pa

g e 40 8

.

z

Z

Con

so rtiu

m

Su

bmiss

ion

o f

Ju

ne 6,

2

014, Res

ponden

ts' R

ecord,

o l .

2

,

Tab

D2,

p

a g e

42 1.

2 3

BC

u bmi

ssion

o

f

J

u ne 6,

2 1

4

t

pa r

s

12, Resp

onden

ts' Re

cord,

o l .

2 ,

Tab D2,

pa g e

411 .

2

4

A

ccess

Copy

right

Su

bmi ssi

on

of

J

u ne

13,

20 1

4, Res

ponde

nts'

Rec

ord.

o l

.

2,

Ta

b D2,

pa

g e 43 6.

2

5

Con

so rtiu

m

Su b

missi o

n

of

J u n e

13, 20

14, Resp

onden

ts' R

ecord

,

o l .

2, Tab D2 ,

pa g

e 45 0.

~ ~


16/40

D

pro

po

sed

i t

s

p u

r p

o r t

e d

co

mp

ro

mis

e

n

i

t s

A p

r i l

26

, 2 0

13

su

bm

iss

io

n

o

n

t

h e

tw

o

a r

i f f

s

a

d

m i n

i s t

r a

t i v

e p

r o v

i s

i o n

s w

he

n t

h e i

s s u

e

ha

d

i

r s t

a

r i s

e n .

2 6

8.

n

u l y

21

,

20

14

, t

he

B

oa

r d i s

s u e

d

a

n

Or

der

s e t

t i n

g

ou

t

t s

p r e

l i

m i n

a r y

c

o n c l u s i o n

t h a t

6

u t

o f

291

copying

events

i d e n t i f i e d

i n

t h e

Vo lu me

Study

we r e

c

o

mp

en s

ab

le

.

Th

e

B

oa

rd

r

e q

u e s

t e

d

t

h e

p

a r t

i e s

t o

ma

ke

a

n u

m b

e r

o f

ma

th

ema

ti

ca

l

c

a l

c u l

a t

i o n

s , wh

ic

h

r e l

a t e

d t

o t

h e

t o t

a l

n u

mb

e r

o

f

pa

g e

s

c

o p i

e d

,

p

e r

F

TE

, p

e r

an

n u

m,

o

r

e

ac

h

g

en

re

o f

wo

rk

d u

r i n

g

t h

e

yea

rs

c

ov

er

ed

b

y t h e

F i

r s t

a

n d

S

e c

o n

d

T

a r i

f f s

.2 7

9

.

T

he

s t

o

f

6

co

mp

e n s

ab

le

c o p

y i

n g

ev

ent

s

l i

s t e

d i

n t h e

B

o a

r d '

s

Or

der

o f

J

u l

y 2

1,

01

4,

e

xcl

ud

ed a l l

d i

g i t

a l

c

opy

in

g

e

v e n

t s

. I

n

i t s

O

rd

er,

h

e B

oa

rd

d i

d n

o t

r e

f e r

t

o a

n y

e g

a l

c o n

c l

u s i

o n

s

t m

ay

ha

v e

re

ac

hed

, r

e q

u e s

t a

n y

u r t

h e r

l e

g a l

s

ub

mi

ssi

on

s fr

om

th

e

p

a

r t i

e s

o

r

r

a i s

e t

he

i

s s u

e o

f

t h

e

D e l

e t i

o n

P

r o v

i s

i o n

.

30 .

n

A

u g u

st

2

8,

2

01

4,

h e

A p

p l i

c a

n t ,

n a

d d

i t i

o n

t

o

p r

o v i

d i

n g

t h

e

mat

he

ma

tic

al

c

a

l c

u l a

t i o

n s re

qu

es

te d

by

t

he

Bo

ar

d, i

l e d a

se

par

at

e

l e t t

e r

c h

a l

l e n

g i

n g

a

n u

mb

e r

o f

t h

e

Bo a

r d '

s

p r

e l i

m i n

a r

y

c

o n

c l u

s i

o n

s

r e

l a t

i n g

t o

t

h e

6

co

mp

e n

s a

bl

e c

o p y

i n

g

e v

e n

t s .

Th

is

e t

t e r

a l

s o

i

n f

o r m

e d

t

h e

Bo

ar

d t h

a t

a

m a j

o r i

t y

o f

t h

e

A p p

l i c

a n

t ' s

p u

b l i

s h e

r

a

f f i

l i a

t e s

h

ad

agr

ee

d t

o wa

iv

e

th

e

D e

l e t

i o

n P

r o

v i s

i o n

w

i t h

r e

t r o

a c t

i v

e

e f

f e

c t

t o

Ja

nua

ry

1 ,

2

01

0,

th

e

s

t a

r t

d

a t

e

o f

t h

e

S e

co

n d

T

a r i f

f .2 8

3

1 .

O

n

e p

te

mb

e r

2,

2

01

4,

th

e

Co

ns

or

tiu

m

an

d B r i

t i s h

C

ol

u m

b i

a

o i n

t l y

w

rot

e

t

o t h

e

B

o

ar

d

o b j

e c

t i n

g

t o t

h e

A

p p l

i c a

n t

' s

l e

t t e r

o

f

Au

g u

s t

2

8,

2

01

4,

o n

t h

e g

rou

nd

t h a

t t w

e n

t

b e y

on

d

t h

e m

at

hem

at

ic

al

c a

l c u

l a t

i o

n s

re

que

st

ed

b

y t h

e

Bo

ar

d

i n

i

t s

O

rd

er

o f

J

u l

y 21

,

01

4.

T

h i

s

l e t

t e r

req

ue

ste

d

t h a

t t h

e

Ap

pli

ca

nts

s

ub

mis

si

on

s

b e

r

u l e

d

p r

o c

e d u

r a

l l y

n a d m i s s i b l e .

2 9

The

Board

subsequently

p r o v i d e d

t h e

A p p l i c a n t

w i t h

an

o p p o r t u n i t y t o

r

e

spo

n d

,

i t

h

a f u r

t h e

r

r i

g h t

o

f

r

e p l

y b

y t

h e

Co

ns

ort

iu

m

a

n d

B

r i t

i s h

C

ol

um

bia

.

3

2 .

n

e

pte

mb

e r

1

1,

2

01

4,

h e

B

oar

d i

s s

u e d

a

R

u l

i n g

t h

a t

t h e

r e p

r e

s e n

t a

t i o

n s

i n

t

h

e

A p p

l i c

a n t

' s

l

e t t

e r o

f

Au

g u s

t

2

8,

2

01

4,

w

e r

e

i n a

d m

i s s

i b

l e f o r

t h

r e e

rea

so

ns

.

F i

r s t

t

he

A p

p l i

c a n

t '

s

su

bmi

ss

io

ns

o n

t h i

s

p o

i n t

h

ad

n o

t

b e e

n

re

que

st

ed

b

y t

h e

B

oa

rd

. S

e co

n d

,

th

e

A

p p

l i c

a n

t s

su

bm

is

si

ons

c

am

e

l

mo

st t

wo

ye

ars

a f t

e r

t h e

c

o n c

l u

s i o

n

o f

i n

a l

o r

a l

a

r

gu

men

ts

.

An

d

t

h i r

d

t h

e Ap

pl

ica

nt

s

s

ub

mi

ssi

on

s

we

r e

e n

t i r

e l y

s p

e c u

l a

t i v

e .

3

o

33

. I n

i

t s Ma

y

22

,

2 0

15

d e

c i s

i o

n , th

e

C o p

y r

i g h

t

Bo

ar

d

ad

opt

ed

t h e

vo

lu

me

ti

me

s

v

a

l u

e

a r i

f f

me

th

od

ol

og y

t h

a t

ha

d

be

en

ad

voc

at

ed

b

y th

e

Co

ns

or

tiu

m

an d

B r i

t i s

h

zs

Co

n s o

rti

um

S u b

mi

s s i

o n

of

J u

n e

1

3,

2

014

,

R

e s p

o n

d e n

ts '

R

eco

r d,

V

o l .

2,

Ta

b D2,

p

ag e

4

41.

Z

o

ar d

O

r d e

r

of J

u l y

2

1,

2 01

4,

Re

s p o

n d

e n t

s '

R

eco

r d ,

V

o l .

2,

Tab

D3

, p ag

e

45

6 .

28

Acc

e s

s

Co

py r

igh

t

L e

t t e

r of

Ru

g u s

t

2

8 ,

20

14

, R

e s p

o n

d e n

ts'

R

eco

r d ,

V o

l .

2,

T

ab

D4,

p a

g e

4

58 .

=

29 C

o n s

o r

t i u

m a

n d

BC

m

a i l

o f

Se p

te

mb e

r 2

, 2

014

,

R

esp

ond

en

ts'

Re

cor

d,

o l

.

2 , Ta

b

D5

,

pa

ge

46

6

3

c

Boa

rd

R u

l i n

g o f S

ept

emb

e r

1

1 ,

2

01

4, R

esp

ond

en

ts

Documents

Provinces Other Than BC Factum Searchabke