Upload
connor-young
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Prosecution Group Luncheon
June 2012
USPTO Report: Intellectual Property-Intensive Industries Contribute $5 Trillion, 40 Million Jobs to U.S. Economy
• virtually every industry either produces or uses IP • IP-intensive industries (75) accounted for about
$5.06 trillion in value added, or 34.8% of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), in 2010.
• IP-intensive industries directly accounted for 27.1 million American jobs, or 18.8% of all employment in the economy, in 2010.
• Avg weekly wages for IP-intensive industries were $1,156 42% higher than the $815 weekly wages in non-IP-intensive private industries.
USPTO Amends Rules For Specimens of Use, Launches Pilot "Deadwood" Project
• The PTO has revised the Rules regarding specimens of use, and has launched a pilot study to review a number of registrations at the Section 8 or renewal stages. – USPTO can upon request, require additional
specimens, information, exhibits, and affidavits or declarations deemed reasonably necessary to examine a post registration affidavit or declaration of continued use, an allegation of use ( 1(a) or 1(b)), or an amendment to a registered mark.
• These new Rules go into effect on June 22, 2012.
ICANN “REVEAL DAY” June 13th• ~2000 applicants for gTLDs• a rough list of the most-filed for strings:
.APP 13
.INC 11
.HOME 11
.ART 10
.LLC 9
.BLOG 9
.BOOK 9
.MUSIC 8
.MOVIE 8
.DESIGN 8
.WEB 7
.HOTEL 7Review list for conflicts?
Not-so-Initial Disclosures• Opposer first identified a potential witness in pre-trial
disclosures. In its initial disclosures, Spier had identified another person who later left the company.
1) the surprise to the party against whom the evidence would be offered;
2) the ability of that party to cure the surprise;3) the extent to which allowing the testimony would disrupt the trial;4) the importance of the evidence; and5) the non-disclosing party’s explanation for its
failure to disclose the evidence. • TTAB granted motion to strike – should have updated• Spier Wines (PTY) Ltd. v. Ofer Z. Shepher, Oppositions Nos.
91182155 and 91182825 (June 12, 2012) [precedential].