30
PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC

Propositional Logic

  • Upload
    dyami

  • View
    29

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Propositional Logic. Proposition. A proposition is a statement that is either true or false, but not both. Atlanta was the site of the 1996 Summer Olympic games. 1+1 = 2 3+1 = 5 What will my CS1050 grade be?. Table 1. The Truth Table for the Negation of a Proposition. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Propositional Logic

PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC

Page 2: Propositional Logic

Proposition

A proposition is a statement that is either true or false, but not both.

Atlanta was the site of the 1996 Summer Olympic games.

1+1 = 2 3+1 = 5 What will my CS1050 grade be?

Page 3: Propositional Logic

Definition 1. Negation of pLet p be a proposition. The statement “It is not the case that p” is also a proposition, called the “negation of p” or ¬p (read “not p”)

Table 1. The Truth Table for theNegation of a Proposition

p ¬p

T FF T

p = The sky is blue.

p = It is not the case that the sky is blue.

p = The sky is not blue.

Page 4: Propositional Logic

Definition 2. Conjunction of p and qLet p and q be propositions. The proposition “p and q,” denoted by pq is true when both p and q are true and is false otherwise. This is called the conjunction of p and q.

Table 2. The Truth Table for the Conjunction of two propositions

p q pq

T T T T F FF T FF F F

Page 5: Propositional Logic

Definition 3. Disjunction of p and q

Let p and q be propositions. The proposition “p or q,” denoted by pq, is the proposition that is false when p and q are both false and true otherwise.

Table 3. The Truth Table for the Disjunction of two propositions

p q pq

T T T T F TF T TF F F

Page 6: Propositional Logic

Definition 4. Exclusive or of p and q

Let p and q be propositions. The exclusive or of p and q, denoted by pq, is the proposition that is true when exactly one of p and q is true and is false otherwise.

Table 4. The Truth Table for the Exclusive OR of two propositions

p q pq

T T F T F TF T TF F F

Page 7: Propositional Logic

Definition 5. Implication pq

Let p and q be propositions. The implication pq is the proposition that is false when p is true and q is false, and true otherwise. In this implication p is called the hypothesis (or antecedent or premise) and q is called the conclusion (or consequence).

Table 5. The Truth Table for the Implication of pq.

p q pq

T T T T F FF T TF F T

Page 8: Propositional Logic

Implications

If p, then q p implies q if p,q p only if q p is sufficient for q q if p q whenever p q is necessary for p

Not the same as the if-then construct used in programming languages such as If p then S

Page 9: Propositional Logic

ImplicationsHow can both p and q be false, and pq be true?•Think of p as a “contract” and q as its “obligation” that is only carried out if the contract is valid.•Example: “If you make more than $25,000, then you must file a tax return.” This says nothing about someone who makes less than $25,000. So the implication is true no matter what someone making less than $25,000 does.•Another example:

p: Bill Gates is poor.q: Pigs can fly.

pq is always true because Bill Gates is not poor. Another way of saying the implication is“Pigs can fly whenever Bill Gates is poor” which is true since neither p nor q is true.

Page 10: Propositional Logic

Related Implications

Converse of p q is q p

Contrapositive of p q is the proposition q p

Inverse of p qIs the propositionp q

Page 11: Propositional Logic

Example

implication: “If it rains today, I will go to college tomorrow”

Converse: I will go to college tomorrow only if it rains today

Contrapositive : If I do not go to college tomorrow, then it will not have rained today

Inverse : If it does not rain today, then I will not go to college tomorrow

Page 12: Propositional Logic

Definition 6. Biconditional

Let p and q be propositions. The biconditional pq is the proposition that is true when p and q have the same truth values and is false otherwise. “p if and only if q, p is necessary and sufficient for q”

Table 6. The Truth Table for the biconditional pq.

p q pq

T T T T F FF T FF F T

Page 13: Propositional Logic

Practice

You do not learn the simple things well.

If you learn the simple things well then the difficult things become easy.

If you do not learn the simple things well, then the difficult things will not become easy.

The difficult things become easy but you did not learn the simple things well.

You learn the simple things well but the difficult things did not become easy.

p: You learn the simple things well.q: The difficult things become easy.

p

pq

p q

q p

p q

Page 14: Propositional Logic

Truth Table Puzzle

Steve would like to determine the relative salaries of three coworkers using two facts (all salaries are distinct):

If Fred is not the highest paid of the three, then Janice is.

If Janice is not the lowest paid, then Maggie is paid the most.

Who is paid the most and who is paid the least?

Page 15: Propositional Logic

p : Janice is paid the most.q: Maggie is paid the most.r: Fred is paid the most.s: Janice is paid the least.

p q r s rp s q (rp) (sq)T F F F T F FF T F T F T FF F T T T T TF T F F F T FF F T F T F F

Fred, Maggie, Janice

•If Fred is not the highest paid of the three, then Janice is.•If Janice is not the lowest paid, then Maggie is paid the most.

Page 16: Propositional Logic

p : Janice is paid the most.q: Maggie is paid the most.r: Fred is paid the most.s: Janice is paid the least.

p q r s rp s q (rp) (sq)T F F F T T TF T F T F T FF F T T T F FF T F F F T FF F T F T T T

Fred, Janice, Maggie or Janice, Maggie, Fredor Janice, Fred, Maggie

•If Fred is not the highest paid of the three, then Janice is.•If Janice is the lowest paid, then Maggie is paid the most.

Page 17: Propositional Logic

Well formed Formula (WFF)

A well formed formula can be produced using following rules:

Rule 1 : A statement variable itself is a WFF Rule 2 : If p is WFF, then p is WFF Rule 3 : If p and q are WFF then (p q), (p q),

(p q) and (p q) are also WFF Rule 4 : A string of symbols consisting of

statement variables, connectives and parentheses is said to be WFF iff it can be produced by applying rule 1, 2 and 3 finitely many times

Page 18: Propositional Logic

Bit Operations

A computer bit has two possible values: 0 (false) and 1 (true). A variable is called a Boolean variable is its value is either true or false.

Bit operations correspond to the logical connectives: OR AND XOR

Information can be represented by bit strings, which are sequences of zeros and ones, and manipulated by operations on the bit strings.

Page 19: Propositional Logic

Truth tables for the bit operations OR, AND, and XOR

0 1

0 0 1

1 1 1 0 1

0 0 0

1 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

1 1 0

Page 20: Propositional Logic

Logical Equivalence

An important technique in proofs is to replace a statement with another statement that is “logically equivalent.”

Tautology: compound proposition that is always true regardless of the truth values of the propositions in it. Eg. p p

Contradiction: Compound proposition that is always false regardless of the truth values of the propositions in it. Eg. p p

Page 21: Propositional Logic

Logically Equivalent

Compound propositions P and Q are logically equivalent if PQ is a tautology. In other words, P and Q have the same truth values for all combinations of truth values of simple propositions.

This is denoted: PQ (or by P Q)

Page 22: Propositional Logic

Example: DeMorgans

Prove that (pq) (p q)pq (pq) (pq) p q (p q) T T

T F

F T

F F

T F F T F

T F F F F

T F T F F F T T T T

Page 23: Propositional Logic

qp

(pq)

Illustration of De Morgan’s Law

Page 24: Propositional Logic

p

p

Illustration of De Morgan’s Law

Page 25: Propositional Logic

q

q

Illustration of De Morgan’s Law

Page 26: Propositional Logic

qp

p q

Illustration of De Morgan’s Law

Page 27: Propositional Logic

Example: Distribution

Prove that: p (q r) (p q) (p r)

p q r qr p(qr) pq pr (pq)(pr)T T T T T T T TT T F F T T T TT F T F T T T TT F F F T T T TF T T T T T T TF T F F F T F FF F T F F F T FF F F F F F F F

Page 28: Propositional Logic

Prove: pq(pq) (qp)

p q pq pq qp (pq)(qp)T T T T T TT F F F T FF T F T F FF F T T T T

We call this biconditional equivalence.

Page 29: Propositional Logic

List of Logical Equivalences

pT p; pF p Identity Laws

pT T; pF F Domination Laws

pp p; pp p Idempotent Laws

(p) p Double Negation Law

pq qp; pq qp Commutative Laws

(pq) r p (qr); (pq) r p (qr) Associative Laws

Page 30: Propositional Logic

List of Equivalences

p(qr) (pq)(pr) Distribution Lawsp(qr) (pq)(pr)

(pq)(p q) De Morgan’s Laws(pq)(p q)

Miscellaneousp p T Or Tautologyp p F And Contradiction(pq) (p q) Implication Equivalence

pq(pq) (qp) Biconditional Equivalence