Upload
dodat
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
"Proof-Revising" with Podcasting: Keeping Readers in Mind as Students Listen to and RethinkTheir WritingAuthor(s): Anne Davis and Ewa McGrailSource: The Reading Teacher, Vol. 62, No. 6 (Mar., 2009), pp. 522-529Published by: International Reading AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20464458 .
Accessed: 18/05/2013 10:25
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
International Reading Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to TheReading Teacher.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 198.190.212.150 on Sat, 18 May 2013 10:25:34 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
"Proof-Revising" With
Podcasting: Keeping Readers
in Mind as Students Listen
To and Rethink Their Writing
Anne Davis, Ewa McGrail
Proof-revising is a complex literacy task that requires practice with a real audience in an authentic writing
context, and activities such as classroom blogs and podcasts can help.
Picture a class of fifth-grade bloggers who have
just published stories on their individual blogs, based on dynamic photographs taken by a re
tired school teacher who was a frequent commenter
on the student blogs. Students used a great deal of
imagination, had fun composing, and were mak
ing good connections. One element was missing though-proofreading-to turn their writing into clear, well-organized, and engaging stories for their readers. Students insisted they had reviewed their stories; however, their idea of proofreading involved quick glances over the story. The teacher challenged the students to improve their writing for their read
ers through the use of technology for more effective
proofreading and revising. All teachers encourage elementary students to
check their spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Students are also asked to be sure the story flows
and makes sense. Elementary students, however, of
ten lack an understanding of how their writing comes
across to readers. In our project, students were ex
periencing and learning to communicate with a real
audience through blogging. Blogging is a motivator for students to write better, as they have an extend
ed audience with whom to connect (Penrod, 2007).
Teachers in Felix's (2007) recent study on blogging
agreed, "[Students] seem to be more motivated to do their best when they know they are publishing for a
worldwide audience" (p. 157). With this motivating force in place, we proposed
a different approach-using teacher podcasts to as
sist students in proofreading and revision. In our con text, the blogging teacher recorded all the podcasts; however, parents or paraprofessionals could assist.
Proof-Revising as a Complex Literacy For most people, proofreading is associated with "making sentence-level revisions" that include "check ing for errors of grammar, punctuation, spelling, cita tions, word choice and...also finding typographical errors" (Chromik, 2002, p. 1). The underlying assump tion is that if the product requires work, it involves pri
marily fixing mechanical and usage errors. Because proofreading for surface errors alone is unlikely to help student writers to appreciate their audience's needs as readers, we offer a combination of proof
reading and revision in our podcasting approach. We
call this process "proof-revising." A podcast is an audio recording that can be post
ed on a student's blog. The podcasting and blogging
technologies engage two senses, hearing and seeing. In addition, audio and text are merged through the
voice of a reader, rather than that of the student. The
audio recording by the teacher, acting as a reader,
helps students experience firsthand the reader's reac tion to their writing. Such reading shows them where
their writing is not understood and where it is enjoy
able, engaging, and clear for readers. Proof-revising
The Reading Teacher, 62(6), pp. 522-529 ( 2009 International Reading Association
522 DOI:10.1 598/RT.62.6.6 ISSN: 0034-0561 print / 1936-2714 online
This content downloaded from 198.190.212.150 on Sat, 18 May 2013 10:25:34 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
./X At t in this way creates for student writers the opportunity to "listen for meaning as a stranger listens," which in
volves attending to "what is actually written, not to what the author intended to say" (Hanna, 1962, p.
482). The goal is to make students willing to rethink
and revise their writing to make it not only clear and
precise but also engaging for readers. Rowe (1998) complained about the challenge of "getting students to revise their writing" (p. 100, emphasis in the origi
nal). We believe that this initial reluctance may be
overcome when student writers themselves come to realize that even though what they have written
may read as clear and engaging to them, it may not
be perceived in the same way by their readers. Our
podcasts of student writing test the communicative effectiveness of their prose for the reader. As Rowe
(1998) put it, "Students need to understand that the good ideas in their heads must be communicated
effectively in order to be understood by their read
ers" (p. 101). How can we help students develop such
understanding? Our answer to this question is to teach students
proof-revising, a process that is both revision and copyediting. While revision calls for rethinking and rewriting their work to produce effective and engag ing writing for readers, copyediting leaves writing free from mechanical and usage errors. As students
step outside themselves and begin to identify with the audience and their needs as readers, they begin
to comprehend the big picture of how their writing
comes across to their blog readers. Students also
learn about the power they have over the written lan
guage to make their writing clear, precise, and engag
ing to their readers (Rowe, 1998). Auditory input plays a critical role. Like text-to
speech software, podcasts help students "to listen to
drafts to improve their logic and fluency" (Hecker &
Engstrom, 2005). However, unlike typical voice rec ognition software that does the work for students
the program transcribes students' readings of text
to text-podcasts engage students actively. This is
because listening to podcasts requires students to
analyze and modify their writing to make it clearer.
Through actively comparing and adjusting their writ ing to the reader's reaction, students develop the
metacognitive skills of monitoring, diagnosing, re vising, and editing- skills critical for improving the quality of their writing (Braaksma, Rijlaarsdam, van den Bergh, & van Hout-Walters, 2004). The podcasting
approach creates a multisensory process and the stu dent receives prompt feedback. These components, and the high expectations from the teacher, create
an environment that promotes learning.
Scaffolding the Technology and the Proof-Revising Process To probe students' understanding of proofreading, the teacher asked these questions: "When you proof read, do you use any resources such as a dictionary,
spell checker, or someone else?" "When you make
changes in your writing, are they usually small or big
changes?" "How do you know that your readers un
derstand what you mean?" From students' responses, the teacher learned that the process involved only a
quick reread, and most felt their writing was good.
Students reported having used computer spell-check ing, reminders from teachers, peer editors, and work sheets. They rarely asked themselves if their readers understood. Their focus was on small changes involv
ing mechanical errors. Our approach was to offer
specific and personalized feedback through teacher podcasts of each story. The teacher introduced the
rationale for the podcasting approach in the follow
ing way: "When you listen to a story read aloud by
someone else, it helps you hear things as they are
specifically written. When you proof with your eyes
only, you read it like you think you wrote it. You don't
always catch errors."
Teacher podcasts were initially personal com munications between student and teacher. They provided a model that was influential in developing
proof-revising that is reader centered but in a "writ
erly" manner (Swenson, Young, McGrail, Rozema, & Whitin, 2006, p. 256). That is, the students were
asked to review their writing in light of their readers'
needs-being able to understand, follow, and enjoy
the creativity and imagination embedded within that
writing. Then the podcasts, a personal communica
tion between student and teacher, were published
on a blog, making the process transparent for other
educators and students to consider for their use. If
students were to create proof-revising podcasts for their peers, direct teacher instruction of this process
would be necessary. For a student to read a paper correctly word-for-word, as it is written through the voice of another reader, requires practice.
"Proof-Revising" With Podcasting: Keeping Readers in Mind as Students Listen To and Rethink Their Writing 523
This content downloaded from 198.190.212.150 on Sat, 18 May 2013 10:25:34 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Constructing a podcast is easy. All you need are
a computer with a microphone, some recording soft
ware such as Audacity, and a driver such as LAME
(2006) to export a podcast project to MP3 format.
Both software pieces can be downloaded free from
the Internet at audacity.sourceforge.net/ and audacity
.sourceforge.net/help/faq?s = install&item = lame mp3.
The basic steps to record MP3s using Audacity
are as follows:
1. Download the Audacity Program. (Figure 1)
2. Open Audacity, click the pink Record button to begin talking and recording your story, and
click the yellow stop button when you finish re
cording the story. (Figure 2)
3. Go to the File menu and save as a project.
(Figure 3)
4. Download LAME driver. Once downloaded,
unzip and extract it to the folder where you
installed Audacity (Under Program Files
Audacity). (Figure 4)
5. Go to the File menu and export the project as
an MP3, a file that you can include in a blog or
post to the Internet. (Figure 5)
Figure 1 Download the Audacity Program
_~~~~~~~~~~~~~!
" A uda ity __________Ih_ s Wikon m $0 Web
~~~~~to AO O----- --r,1111,
DoWll? Dowid"da
!UWft'L2 Select y operatng sytem to download We latest 1ersmn or Dm tree Audacity sound ettor
Stable: 1.2 -fr al usm Beta: 1.3 for advanced useu Latest versom Laest versions,
AIC windows 126 1dow i 3s
- R l -| |lo MacOsX | , MacOSX
i.2 5 (Intel or 1 2 6 (PPC) 1 3 5 (Lvesal Bnary)
_---! _
|-.5 . LInuxUnIx LlnuxAiJnlx .. . t- - 2 6 (in source code) 1.3 5 (isource code)
~~~~~~....... ..... ..... .... .. .. .. . .. ...... -
Note. From the Audacity website audacity.sourceforge.net/download/.
524 The Reading Teacher Vol. 62, No. 6 March 2009
This content downloaded from 198.190.212.150 on Sat, 18 May 2013 10:25:34 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Figure 2
Open Audacity
rSe4I~VJ 4wzQ~OA *JWt ri4 o n
Note. From the Audacity website audacity.sourceforge.net/download/.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A, 4 -
K~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . ..... ......... . . .. . ..............
Additional screenshots and tutorials are available at
www.guidesandtutorials.com/audacity-tutorial.html As students engaged in the proof-revising pro
cess, the teacher asked them to revisit their story
drafts. They each were to listen to the podcasts of
their own stories. The students' task was to improve the fluency of the writing by paying attention to the
following questions:
* Does my story flow?
* Does it make sense?
* Does it sound like I thought I had written it?
* Would I have read it the same way?
* Can punctuation help?
*Did misspellings or wording change my
meanings?
To facilitate the task of reading and listening at the same time, students were instructed to open the podcast of their story on the class blog and to use
their individual blogs to follow along. This required students to have two windows open. There was a lot
of confusion on the first attempt. Some were mes merized by the screen designs appearing on their podcast. Others did not know where to begin. The teacher suggested they follow along using a sheet of paper to track words across the screen as they
"Proof-Revising" With Podcasting: Keeping Readers in Mind as Students Listen To and Rethink Their Writing 525
This content downloaded from 198.190.212.150 on Sat, 18 May 2013 10:25:34 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Save Project
y~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ .... ..:> wa.ocs: _ ... ._S e v t > : E o _ t v o w o o : @ > : o o > v : v r * _ _ o > o w > 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.............
(7-=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ iE =S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A iiiii'i ; .+' ; = __L ...... ---- .. . .. .... ........... ........................
4 n t5s E E~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J .. ........ ....... . .... ...
l~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .. .. .. .. .... ..
i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L ......
$ X B t,. :Re efs . a.,a,v4 .X9,:. :,.S<jiX; 3,. 0 fi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ....... . .. . .. .... ..
i~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ g t} ^ e 3; j > @ *>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'A "
3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~..... ..410,4"l 401i40
; ......... ...... .h ..act websit a d ct.o re rg ... /o nla /
listened. This time they realized they needed to pay attention. They listened again.
Students recognized how this helped their writing and communication. Michael (all names are pseud onyms) noticed, "I thought that I had no errors until I heard the podcast which said the mistakes." M.V.
realized, "mistakes can actually be useful because they tell you what you can improve on." (All student
quotes are unedited.) Students began to develop self-monitoring hab
its. They were learning to notice how their writing sounded as it was written and to draw conclusions
about how it should have looked in print to reflect
their original intent. A class discussion followed, with
students sharing discoveries. Many were surprised to learn that their writing was not exactly as they had thought. Students found some errors humorous, but others were dismayed about their actual writing. They were beginning not only to understand the complexi ties of proof-revising but also to appreciate its value.
This discussion culminated in students creating mini podcasts with proof-revising pointers for themselves and peers. The following are some examples of the advice they offered.
"You shouldn't use the same word over and over again.
You should change your words and make them more
interesting to the reader."
526 The Reading Teacher Vol. 62, No. 6 March 2009
This content downloaded from 198.190.212.150 on Sat, 18 May 2013 10:25:34 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 Download LAME Driver
t_/ How do I dwownlad md nu ti LAME Mfl Itenod ?
FRA Becaus of nftnrepaktsftlwef cmame distibt MP3 eMm"in sftnre "Ours",t Fcokw thesn flstractlto uwefl Nree LAME encoder to sqiort MPSfiestVh AJJdctv
I Gem the LAME dowlad an. 01 ~~~2, Under Tre Audwacy on. YWfllWs lefttlitk ent the w* t#mpSia:me-b-3,97.4p~ and sawe the zip feldierito afvywre
on your computer,
8*kkmJ* ~3, WWOm i yw v lifhUtp V ie P oer, urwp It ino a tve1w nie Iw,*DAIx ttIM it cofltfi to
errPvt*w on yurcomprnue 4. Theflw toyw use the Emportas MPY- wcmoos, Audatty Wvm askyou where lances is saved,
5. i case of chftuhy. p*ae vw* our mrdetedf wtMns atth
I 000: . the; LAWME. 1 A._ *,
2. ownIoad erlbmp3lande or ft oeItr of LarEUb tar your etMn ebtam.
Note. From the Audacity website: www.guidesandtutorials.com/audaoty-Iame.html.
NoeI ro h Auact wesie ww.giersantuoral.o m/audacdti*ty-lme.t"cml. a 39tFepfoeb
E w ygur somF~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"What I learned is to let somebody read your story, like
to recheck your story."
"Think about what you are going to write, like you
need a brainstorm before you do anything else."
"When you are writing, always pay attention."
Leslie summarized the entire podcasting experience with her realization that reading her writing aloud
had caused her to notice how it sounded to other
readers unfamiliar with the text. The process resulted in her desire to be more careful and ensure that other
readers could understand her writing. Students were proud of their new understandings
and began to embrace the concept of proof-revising
to make meaning clearer to the reader. The teacher
observed carry-over, as many students were reading aloud their revisions as well as brainstorming with classmates to make their writing effective and engag ing for readers.
The Place of Podcasting in the Revision Process Proof-revising is a complex literacy task that requires practice with a real audience in an authentic writing
context such as classroom blogging. It is a challenge
for students as well as teachers, but it is one that can
improve student communication skills and literacies.
"Proof-Revising" With Podcasting: Keeping Readers in Mind as Students Listen To and Rethink Their Writing 527
This content downloaded from 198.190.212.150 on Sat, 18 May 2013 10:25:34 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Figure 5
Export Project as MP3
.i < < r iS i. .s a.. ._OV .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~....... .. i '' :' .., .. . .
WS ' S S'" ';" i "S ' 0 ' i005 . : i.j...... . .......... ......... i. _: ... .. .............. .... .. .... 9
Noi0'"te. From the Audac-'ity w bitel audacl:'ity E i;: i: E7BS^Ss.,sourcfoge.%:;;? net/downSoad/.
N B: j 20i |C>: l;itf; . i:- :: at:i: | . i::i5jf - ig tX aaleB6SR;S;BSt26aX 0X _ = _ 0 |Rga~~--- - ---- - ---- - ---
It exemplifies seamless integration of technology with a complex thinking and learning task that goes
beyond editing for surface errors to engage students in rereading, listening, thinking, and relating to the audience. Making the blogs and podcasts public lets others view students' responses and contribute ad ditional improvements.
This approach is not one to be used daily in the
classroom but rather used selectively and purpose fully from time to time. Because a teacher's time is
precious, the teacher may choose only excerpts from student writing for podcast reading. Ideally, excerpts selected should reflect areas of strength as well as
weakness in each student's communication with the audience. This lets the teacher provide individual feedback. Although the use of strategies such as peer
review or cue cards with questions should be con
tinued to improve student revisions, proof-revising through podcasting is worth exploring further in our classrooms.
References
Audacity [Open source audio recorder and editor software].
(2008). Boston, MA: Free Software Foundation. Retrieved
September 24, 2008, from audacity.sourceforge.net/
Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., & van Hout
Walters, B.H.A.M. (2004). Observational learning and its ef
fects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and
Instruction, 22(1), 1-36. doi: 10.1207/sl532690Xci2201J Chromik, M. (2002). Proofreading, its value, and its place in the
writing center. Naugatuck, CT: University of Connecticut
Writing Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
ED476401) Felix, J.P. (2007). Edublogging: Instruction for the digital age learn
er. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California,
San Diego; California State University, San Marcos; San Diego
State University, California.
Hanna, G. (1962). Proofreading, a panacea: Attention, junior
high English teachers. English Journal, 51(1), 482-483. doi:
10.2307/811315
Hecker, L., & Engstrom, E.U. (2005). Assistive technology and
individuals with dyslexia. [Online chapter] In J.R. Birsh
(Ed.), Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (2nd
ed.). Baltimore: Brooks. Retrieved September 24, 2008, from
textbooks.brookespublishing.com/birsh/21/fulltext.htm
528 The Reading Teacher Vol. 62, No. 6 March 2009
This content downloaded from 198.190.212.150 on Sat, 18 May 2013 10:25:34 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
LAME [MP3 Encoder Version 3.97]. (2006, September). Retrieved
from audacity.sourceforge.net/help/faq?s=install&item=lame
mp3 Penrod, D. (2007). Using blogs to enhance literacy: The next pow
erful step in 21st-century learning. Lanham, MD: Rowman &
Littlefield.
Rowe, S. (1998). Using minilessons to promote student revision:
Helping students realize their power over words. In Weaver, C
(Ed.), Lessons to share on teaching grammar in context (pp.
100-110). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Swenson, J., Young, CA., McGrail, E., Rozema, R., & Whitin, P.
(2006). Extending the conversation: New technologies, new
literacies, and English education. English Education, 38(4), 349-367.
Davis is an information systems training specialist at Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA; e-mail [email protected]. McGrail teaches at Georgia State University; e-mail [email protected].
(Orc.ca Echoes Early Chapter Books
Early chapter books for beginning readers
Ages 7 to 9 * RL Grades 2-3
Tim berwolf Tracks Sigmund Brouwer
illustrated by Graham Ross 978-I-55 143-734-7
$6-95 PB 64 PAGES
Marsh Island Sonya Spreen Bates
illustrated by Kasia Charko 978-I-5 5469-iI17-3
$ 695 PB 4PAGES
Bruno for Real Caroline Adderson
illustrated by Helen Flook 978-I-5 5469-023-7
$6.95 PB 64 PAGES
"Orca Echoes ... strike the right balance
between accessibility and stimulation."
-uill , Qu _ir
ORCAun BOoKuBLIHER
~~~~~~7-- ww.raboo 14-3-80-7 057
"Proof-Revising" With Podcasting: Keeping Readers in Mind as Students Listen To and Rethink Their Writing 529
This content downloaded from 198.190.212.150 on Sat, 18 May 2013 10:25:34 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions