Upload
greg-broiles
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
1/46
F I L E D U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T
F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A , A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N , n f t ,
P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a o f U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c .
P l a i n t i f f ,
N o . J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s K t * / U >
H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,
D e f e n d a n t s .
P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s C o m p l a i n t F o r V i o l a t i o n s t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t a n d t h e V i r g i n i a C o m p u t e r C r i m e s A c t
S p a m g l o b a l p r o b l e m e p i d e m i c p r o p o r t i o n s , a n d t h e t r e n d l i n e s a r e h e a d e d t h e w r o n g d i r e c t i o n . s o m e e s t i m a t e s , s p a m n o w c o n s t i t u t e s o v e r 9 0 % a l l e m a i l t r a f f i c . U s i n g v a s t n e t w o r k s h i j a c k e d c o m p u t e r s , c o u n t e r f e i t e r s , t h i e v e s a n d h i - t e c h s n a k e - o i l
s a l e s m e n n o w h a v e i n s t a n t a c c e s s g l o b a l m a r k e t p l a c e . l o n g e r r e l e g a t e d d a r k s t r e e t c o r n e r s , b a s e m e n t l a b s , a n d t h e t r u n k s s e e d y c a r s , i l l e g a l a n d d a n g e r o u s p r o d u c t s a r e n o w o n l y m o u s e c l i c k a w a y f r o m e v e r y I n t e r n e t u s e r . S p a m m e r s d o n ' t e v e n n e e d h a v e p r o d u c t
s e l l m a k e m o n e y . I d e n t i t y t h i e v e s , e x t o r t i o n i s t s a n d p h i s h e r s h a v e o p e n e d I n t e r n e t s t o r e f r o n t s ,
a n d u n w i t t i n g v i c t i m s f a l l p r e y t h e m e v e r y d a y w i t h o u t e v e r l e a v i n g t h e i r l i v i n g r o o m s . C h i l d r e n a r e a l s o v i c t i m i z e d s p a m , w h i c h o f f e r s t h e m e a s y a c c e s s i l l i c i t d r u g s , p r e s c r i p t i o n
d r u g s t h a t n e e d p r e s c r i p t i o n , g a m b l i n g w e b s i t e s , p o r n o g r a p h y , f a k e I D s , s p y w a r e d i s g u i s e d
c o m p u t e r g a m e s , a n d h o s t o t h e r t e m p t a t i o n s . N a t i o n - s t a t e s , t o o , a r e f a l l i n g v i c t i m s p a m
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 10
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
2/46
a n d t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l c r i m i n a l g a n g s t h a t a r e i n c r e a s i n g l y b e h i n d i t . G o v e r n m e n t c o r r u p t i o n , f a i l e d l e g a l s y s t e m s a n d s a f e h a v e n r u l e s t h a t g e n e r a t e a s u b s t a n t i a l p o r t i o n t h e n a t i o n - s t a t e ' s G D P a l l c o n t r i b u t e t h e p r o b l e m , a n d a r e a l l b e i n g e x p l o i t e d s p a m m e r s .
l o n g l i s t l a w s p r o h i b i t s s p a m . P e r h a p s t h e m o s t e l e g a n t t h e c e n t u r i e s o l d c o m m o n l a w o f t r e s p a s s t o c h a t t e l s , w h i c h o n e j u d g e t h i s D i s t r i c t s u g g e s t e d f i t t h e s p a m p r o b l e m l i k e h a n d i n g l o v e . N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g t h a t s u g g e s t i o n , f l u r r y s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l s t a t u t e s h a s b e e n p a s s e d o v e r t h e l a s t d e c a d e a t t e m p t s t o p s p a m ( o r l e a s t s l o w i t s g r o w t h ) w i t h o u t u n d u l y b u r d e n i n g " h a m " ( n o n - s p a m m y e m a i l ) . T h e c u l m i n a t i o n t h i s l e g i s l a t i v e a c t i v i t y w a s t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t o f 2 0 0 3 ( 1 5 U . S . C . 7 7 0 1 e t s e q . ) .
C A N - S P A M , w a s h o p e d , w o u l d h e l p s t o p s p a m c l a r i f y i n g t h e r u l e s t h a t b u l k e m a i l e r s w e r e s u p p o s e d f o l l o w . T h e r e a l i t y t h a t l e g i t i m a t e e m a i l e r s g e n e r a l l y c o m p l i e d w i t h C A N - S P A M l o n g b e f o r e w a s e n a c t e d , l e a s t c o m p l i e d t h e d e g r e e t h a t t h e i d e n t i t y s o m e o n e w h o a c c e p t e d r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e m a i l i n g c o u l d f o u n d t h e f a c e t h e m e s s a g e i t s e l f . S p a m d i f f e r e n t . i t s f a c e , s p a m n e v e r i d e n t i f i e s a n y o n e w i l l i n g a c c e p t r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e m a i l i n g . T h e r e a s o n s i m p l e - s p a m v i o l a t e s t h e m o s t b a s i c s t a n d a r d s g o o d c o n d u c t . O n c e i d e n t i f i e d , s p a m m e r s c a n n o t d e f e n d t h e i r " b u s i n e s s " p r a c t i c e s a n y o n e , l e t a l o n e a n u p s t r e a m w e b h o s t , e m a i l s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r j u d i c i a l f a c t f i n d e r .
t h e r e w e r e e v e r a n y d o u b t , t o d a y c l e a r t h a t t h e k e y s t o p p i n g s p a m i d e n t i f y i n g t h o s e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r i t , a n d g e t t i n g t h a t i n f o r m a t i o n i n t o t h e h a n d s t h o s e w i l l i n g
a n d a b l e s o m e t h i n g a b o u t i t .
D i s c o v e r i n g s p a m m e r ' s i d e n t i t y n o t s i m p l e , b u t n o t i m p o s s i b l e e i t h e r . h i d e s u c c e s s f u l l y , s p a m m e r s h a v e m o r e t h a n j u s t a v o i d p u t t i n g t h e i r n a m e t h e i r m e s s a g e s . E v e r y t h i n g t h e y h a s a n o n y m o u s ; t h e y h a v e h i d e w h i l e
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 10
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
3/46
s i m u l t a n e o u s l y f o o l i n g t h e i r v i c t i m s ( a n d e v e r y o n e e l s e w h o p r o v i d i n g t h e m w i t h s o m e s e r v i c e
e s s e n t i a l t o t h e i r c r i m i n a l e n t e r p r i s e ) i n t o t h i n k i n g t h e y a r e r u n n i n g l e g i t i m a t e b u s i n e s s .
T h e f i r s t t h i n g s p a m m e r n e e d s l o n g l i s t e m a i l a d d r e s s e s s p a m .
S p a m m e r s g e t y o u r e m a i l a d d r e s s t w o p r i m a r y w a y s . T h e y s t e a l t h e m ( v i a h a r v e s t i n g ) t h e y
g u e s s t h e m ( v i a d i c t i o n a r y a t t a c k s ) . T h e m o s t c o m m o n w a y s p a m m e r s s t e a l e m a i l a d d r e s s e s h a r v e s t i n g t h e m f r o m w e b s i t e s , u s i n g w e b s p i d e r s . T h i s m a k e s l i f e d i f f i c u l t f o r t h e r e s t
b e c a u s e p o s t i n g e m a i l a d d r e s s e s w e b s i t e c o n v e n i e n t w a y f a c i l i t a t e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s b e t w e e n v i s i t o r s t o w e b s i t e a n d t h e o w n e r s o f t h e w e b s i t e . O w n e r s w e b s i t e s w h o w a n t
d i s p l a y e m a i l a d d r e s s e s c a n o b t a i n s o m e p r o t e c t i o n f r o m h a r v e s t e r s i n s t a l l i n g P r o j e c t H o n e y
P o t t h e i r w e b s i t e , a n d d i s p l a y i n g t h i s P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t l o g o t h e i r w e b s i t e : 1
T h e l o g o s e r v e s w a r n i n g h a r v e s t e r s t h a t a l l t h e e m a i l a d d r e s s e s d i s p l a y e d a n y w h e r e
t h e w e b s i t e a r e p r o t e c t e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t a n d d e t e r s h a r v e s t e r s p u t t i n g t h e m l e g a l r i s k t h e y s p a m a n y a d d r e s s e s h a r v e s t e d f r o m t h e w e b s i t e .
D o m a i n n a m e o w n e r s w h o w a n t p r o t e c t t h e i r e m a i l s y s t e m f r o m s p a m c a n o b t a i n s o m e p r o t e c t i o n d o n a t i n g r e c o r d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , a n d t h e n p u b l i c l y
d i s c l o s i n g t h e f a c t t h e i r d o n a t i o n ( b u t t h e y s h o u l d n o t d i s c l o s e t h e s p e c i f i c r e c o r d
d o n a t e d , s p a m m e r s w i l l s i m p l y a v o i d t h i s r e c o r d a n d c o n t i n u e s e n d s p a m
T h e w e b s i t e f o r t h e l o g o c a n f o u n d h t t p : / / w w w . p r o i e c t h o n e y p o t . o r s / h o w a v o i d s p a m h o t s S . p h p .
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 3 of 10
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
4/46
r e c o r d s n o t d o n a t e d P H P ) . p u b l i c l y d i s c l o s i n g t h e i r a f f i l i a t i o n w i t h P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , P H P m e m b e r s w a r n s p a m m e r s t h a t t h e i r d o m a i n n a m e s a r e p r o t e c t e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t .
P r o j e c t H o n e v P o t d b a U n s o a m T e c h n o l o g i e s . I n c . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t f w w w . D r o i e c t h o n e v n o t . o r ^ d i s t r i b u t e d n e t w o r k
s p a m - t r a c k i n g h o n e y p o t s . T h e p r o j e c t a l l o w s s p a m m e r s , p h i s h e r s , a n d o t h e r e - c r i m i n a l s t r a c k e d t h r o u g h o u t t h e e n t i r e " s p a m c y c l e . " i n f o r m a t i o n a n d b e l i e f , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t w a s t h e f i r s t d i s t r i b u t e d e - m a i l h a r v e s t i n g r e s e a r c h e f f o r t l i n k i n g t h o s e t h a t g a t h e r e - m a i l a d d r e s s e s s c r a p i n g w e b s i t e s w i t h t h o s e t h a t s e n d u n s o l i c i t e d a n d f r e q u e n t l y f r a u d u l e n t m e s s a g e s . T e n s o f t h o u s a n d s u s e r s f r o m l e a s t 1 0 0 c o u n t r i e s a c t i v e l y p a r t i c i p a t e i n P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s e f f o r t t r a c k c r i m i n a l s w h o b r e a k t h e l a w v i a e m a i l . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t w a s c r e a t e d U n s p a m
T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c ( w w w . u n s p a m . c o m ) a n t i - s p a m c o m p a n y w i t h t h e s i n g u l a r m i s s i o n h e l p i n g d e s i g n a n d e n f o r c e e f f e c t i v e a n t i - s p a m l a w s . U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . D e l a w a r e c o r p o r a t i o n w i t h i t s p r i n c i p a l p l a c e b u s i n e s s 1 9 0 1 P r o s p e c t o r A v e . , S u i t e # 2 0 0 ,
P a r k C i t y , U t a h 8 4 0 6 0 . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t r e c e i v e s r e c o r d d o n a t i o n s f r o m t h e o w n e r s o f
I n t e r n e t d o m a i n n a m e s . T h r o u g h t h o s e d o n a t i o n s , e m a i l m e s s a g e s a d d r e s s e d a n y u s e r n a m e h o s t e d d o n a t e d d o m a i n n a m e a r e d i r e c t e d e m a i l s e r v e r s o w n e d a n d m a i n t a i n e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , a n d t h o s e e m a i l m e s s a g e s a r e t h e n p r o c e s s e d a n d s t o r e d c o m p u t e r e q u i p m e n t o w n e d a n d m a i n t a i n e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t a l s o m a k e s a v a i l a b l e I n t e r n e t w e b s i t e o w n e r s e m a i l a d d r e s s h o n e y p o t s t h a t c a n i n s t a l l e d t h e i r w e b p a g e s . W h e n h a r v e s t e r v i s i t s t h o s e w e b p a g e s l o o k i n g f o r e m a i l a d d r e s s e s s t e a l , t h e h a r v e s t e r h a n d e d u n i q u e e m a i l a d d r e s s h o s t e d w i t h i n P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s d i s t r i b u t e d n e t w o r k d o n a t e d r e c o r d s . T h e h a r v e s t e r ' s I P a d d r e s s , t h e d a t e a n d t i m e t h e v i s i t a n d o t h e r c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s t h e
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 4 of 10
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
5/46
h a r v e s t e r a r e r e c o r d e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t a n d m a i n t a i n e d f o r a n a l y s i s a n d t r a c k i n g . W h e n s p a m m e s s a g e r e c e i v e d t h e r e a f t e r t h e u n i q u e e m a i l a d d r e s s , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t c a n t i e t h e s p a m m e s s a g e ( a n d t h e s p a m m e r ) t h e h a r v e s t e r t h a t w a s g i v e n t h a t e m a i l a d d r e s s .
1 0 . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t c u r r e n t l y m o n i t o r i n g o v e r 2 . 1 m i l l i o n h o n e y p o t a d d r e s s e s f o r a n n o y i n g s p a m a n d d a n g e r o u s p h i s h i n g m e s s a g e s . B e t w e e n J a n u a r y 2 0 0 5 a n d A p r i l 2 0 0 7 , J o h n D o e s p a m m e r s t r a n s m i t t e d o v e r 6 . 1 m i l l i o n s p a m m e s s a g e s t e n s t h o u s a n d s u n i q u e e m a i l a d d r e s s e s b e l o n g i n g P H P m e m b e r s t h a t h a v e d o n a t e d r e c o r d t o , a n d
a r e r e c e i v i n g a n t i - s p a m p r o t e c t i o n f r o m , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t . A l l t h e s e e m a i l a d d r e s s e s w e r e i l l e g a l l y h a r v e s t e d t h e s p a m m e r ( o r o n e h i s c o - c o n s p i r a t o r s ) f r o m w e b s i t e h o s t i n g P H P h o n e y p o t , w e r e t h e s u b j e c t d i c t i o n a r y s p a m a t t a c k s t h a t i n d i s c r i m i n a t e l y t a r g e t e d r a n d o m u s e r n a m e s h o s t e d w i t h i n I n t e r n e t d o m a i n n a m e s t h a t h a v e d o n a t e d r e c o r d t o , a n d a r e r e c e i v i n g a n t i - s p a m p r o t e c t i o n f r o m , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t .
1 1 . d a t e , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h a s i d e n t i f i e d 2 , 4 8 9 , 8 1 4 u n i q u e s p a m s e r v e r I P a d d r e s s e s , 1 5 , 5 7 0 u n i q u e h a r v e s t e r a d d r e s s e s , 8 7 , 6 4 3 u n i q u e d i c t i o n a r y a t t a c k s p a m s e r v e r I P a d d r e s s e s , a n d s i n c e A p r i l 2 0 0 7 , h a s i d e n t i f i e d 6 3 0 c o m m e n t s p a m s e r v e r I P a d d r e s s e s .
1 2 . E v e r y s p a m m e s s a g e t r a n s m i t t e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h o n e y p o t e m a i l a d d r e s s h a r m s P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t . E a c h s p a m m e s s a g e r e c e i v e d m a i l s e r v e r c o n t r o l l e d a n d p a i d f o r P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , w h i c h t h e n m u s t p r o c e s s , s t o r e a n d a n a l y z e t h e m e s s a g e h e l p p r o t e c t t h e w e b s i t e o w n e r s w h o h a v e i n s t a l l e d h o n e y p o t s t h e i r w e b p a g e s f r o m h a r v e s t e r s , a n d p r o t e c t t h e d o m a i n n a m e o w n e r s w h o h a v e d o n a t e d r e c o r d s f r o m s p a m a t t a c k s .
1 3 . t h i s a c t i o n , P l a i n t i f f s e e k s : ( i ) i n j u n c t i o n p r e v e n t f u r t h e r u n l a w f u l c o n d u c t ; ( i i ) c o m p e n s a t o r y d a m a g e s ; ( i i i ) p u n i t i v e d a m a g e s ; ( i v ) a t t o r n e y s ' f e e s a n d c o s t s s u i t .
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 5 of 10
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
6/46
J o h n D o e D e f e n d a n t s
1 4 . D e f e n d a n t s ' i d e n t i t y c u r r e n t l y u n k n o w n P l a i n t i f f b e c a u s e D e f e n d a n t s h a v e i n t e n t i o n a l l y a c t e d h i d e t h e i r i d e n t i t y e v a d e d e t e c t i o n .
J U R I S D I C T I O N A N D V F N T 1 F 1 5 . T h i s a c t i o n a r i s e s o u t D e f e n d a n t s ' v i o l a t i o n t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M
A c t . T h e C o u r t h a s s u b j e c t m a t t e r j u r i s d i c t i o n t h i s a c t i o n b a s e d o n 2 8 U . S . C . 1 3 3 1 . 1 6 . P u r s u a n t U . S . C . 1 3 9 1 ( b ) , v e n u e p r o p e r t h i s j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t .
s u b s t a n t i a l p a r t t h e e v e n t s o r o m i s s i o n s g i v i n g r i s e P l a i n t i f f s c l a i m s , t o g e t h e r w i t h s u b s t a n t i a l p a r t t h e p r o p e r t y t h a t t h e s u b j e c t P l a i n t i f f c l a i m s , a r e s i t u a t e d i n t h i s j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t . F o r e x a m p l e , 1 6 6 P H P m e m b e r s s e l f - r e p o r t t h e y a r e l o c a t e d V i r g i n i a . P H P m e m b e r s h a v e i n s t a l l e d h o n e y p o t s 1 7 5 w e b s i t e s t h a t a r e l o c a t e d V i r g i n i a , a n d t h e s e V i r g i n i a - b a s e d h o n e y p o t s h a v e d i s t r i b u t e d 3 6 , 4 0 2 e m a i l a d d r e s s e s i d e n t i f i e d h a r v e s t e r s w o r l d - w i d e . a d d i t i o n P H P ' s s u b s t a n t i a l p r e s e n c e i n V i r g i n i a , t h e J o h n D o e s a l s o h a v e s u b s t a n t i a l
c o n n e c t i o n s V i r g i n i a . F o r e x a m p l e , t h e J o h n D o e s p a m m e r s h a v e u s e d 1 1 1 h a r v e s t e r a d d r e s s e s V i r g i n i a h a r v e s t 8 4 8 P H P m e m b e r h o n e y p o t e m a i l a d d r e s s e s . T h e J o h n D o e s h a v e a l s o u s e d 2 0 , 7 7 8 s p a m s e r v e r I P s l o c a t e d V i r g i n i a t r a n s m i t 6 0 , 1 4 3 s p a m m e s s a g e s P H P m e m b e r h o n e y p o t e m a i l a d d r e s s e s . A n d 2 4 5 o c c a s i o n s , t h e J o h n D o e s h a v e r e l i e d e n t i r e l y V i r g i n i a a d d r e s s e s f u r t h e r t h e i r i l l e g a l e n t e r p r i s e h a r v e s t i n g a P H P m e m b e r e m a i l a d d r e s s f r o m a V i r g i n i a - b a s e d a d d r e s s a n d t h e n s e n d i n g s p a m t o t h a t a d d r e s s f r o m s p a m s e r v e r u s i n g V i r g i n i a - b a s e d I P a d d r e s s . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e w e b p a g e s a d v e r t i s e d t h e s p a m m e s s a g e s w e r e a l l v i s i b l e i n V i r g i n i a , a n d ( o n i n f o r m a t i o n a n d b e l i e f ) m a n y t h e p r o d u c t s a n d s e r v i c e s a d v e r t i s e d t h e s p a m m e s s a g e s w e r e s h i p p e d d e l i v e r e d p h y s i c a l a d d r e s s e s V i r g i n i a .
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 6 of 10
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
7/46
1 7 . T h e f e d e r a l D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t V i r g i n i a h a s p e r s o n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r D e f e n d a n t s b a s e d t h e f o l l o w i n g f a c t s : D e f e n d a n t s i n i t i a t e d e m a i l s f r o m t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t V i r g i n i a , g a i n e d u n a u t h o r i z e d a c c e s s c o m p u t e r s e r v e r s l o c a t e d t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t , c a u s e d t o r t i o u s i n j u r y t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t , a n d c o n d u c t e d b u s i n e s s t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t V i r g i n i a .
C O U N T I V i o l a t i o n t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t T T , S . C . 7 7 0 1 s o q 1 8 . P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s a n d r e - a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s p a r a g r a p h s t h r o u g h
t h i s C o m p l a i n t .
1 9 . D e f e n d a n t s i n i t i a t e d t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n , p r o t e c t e d c o m p u t e r , c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e t h a t c o n t a i n e d , o r w a s a c c o m p a n i e d b y , h e a d e r i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t w a s m a t e r i a l l y f a l s e m a t e r i a l l y m i s l e a d i n g , v i o l a t i o n U S C 7 7 0 4 ( a ) ( l ) .
2 0 . p a t t e r n p r a c t i c e , D e f e n d a n t s i n i t i a t e d t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n p r o t e c t e d c o m p u t e r c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e t h a t d i d n o t c o n t a i n f u n c t i o n i n g r e t u r n e l e c t r o n i c m a i l a d d r e s s o r o t h e r I n t e r n e t - b a s e d m e c h a n i s m , c l e a r l y a n d c o n s p i c u o u s l y d i s p l a y e d , t h a t r e c i p i e n t c o u l d u s e s u b m i t , m a n n e r s p e c i f i e d t h e m e s s a g e , r e p l y e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e o t h e r f o r m o f I n t e r n e t - b a s e d c o m m u n i c a t i o n r e q u e s t i n g n o t r e c e i v e f u t u r e c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e s f r o m t h a t s e n d e r t h e e l e c t r o n i c m a i l a d d r e s s w h e r e t h e m e s s a g e w a s r e c e i v e d , i n v i o l a t i o n U S C 7 7 0 4 ( a ) ( 3 ) .
2 1 . I n p a t t e r n p r a c t i c e , D e f e n d a n t s i n i t i a t e d t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e p r o t e c t e d c o m p u t e r a n d f a i l e d t o p r o v i d e : ( i ) c l e a r a n d c o n s p i c u o u s i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t h a t t h e m e s s a g e w a s a d v e r t i s e m e n t o r s o l i c i t a t i o n ; ( i i ) c l e a r a n d c o n s p i c u o u s n o t i c e t h a t t h e r e c i p i e n t c o u l d d e c l i n e r e c e i v e f t i r t h e r c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 7 of 10
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
8/46
m e s s a g e s f r o m t h e s e n d e r ; a n d ( i i i ) v a l i d p h y s i c a l p o s t a l a d d r e s s t h e s e n d e r , v i o l a t i o n 1 5 U S C 7 7 0 4 ( a ) ( 5 ) .
2 2 . P l a i n t i f f I n t e r n e t a c c e s s s e r v i c e a d v e r s e l y a f f e c t e d t h e a b o v e v i o l a t i o n s , a n d e n t i t l e d i n j u n c t i o n b a r r i n g f u r t h e r v i o l a t i o n s , s t a t u t o r y d a m a g e s o f $ 1 0 0 f o r e v e r y a t t e m p t e d t r a n s m i s s i o n s p a m m e s s a g e t h a t c o n t a i n s f a l s e m i s l e a d i n g t r a n s m i s s i o n i n f o r m a t i o n , s t a t u t o r y d a m a g e s o f $ 2 5 f o r e v e r y a t t e m p t e d t r a n s m i s s i o n s p a m m e s s a g e t h a t o t h e r w i s e f a i l s c o m p l y w i t h t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t , t r e b l e d a m a g e s r e s u l t i n g f r o m D e f e n d a n t s ' u s e e m a i l h a r v e s t e r s a n d d i c t i o n a r y a t t a c k s f a c i l i t a t e t h e i r v i o l a t i o n s t h e C A N - S P A M A c t , a n d a t t o r n e y f e e s a n d c o s t s , a u t h o r i z e d U S C 7 7 0 6 ( g ) .
C O U N T V i o l a t i o n o f V i r g i n i a ' s A n t i - S p a m S t a t u t e ( 1 8 V a . C o d e 1 8 . 2 - 1 5 2 . 3 : 1 s e q . )
2 3 . P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s a n d r e - a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s p a r a g r a p h s t h r o u g h t h i s C o m p l a i n t .
2 4 . D e f e n d a n t s u s e d c o m p u t e r c o m p u t e r n e t w o r k w i t h t h e i n t e n t t o f a l s i f y f o r g e e l e c t r o n i c m a i l t r a n s m i s s i o n i n f o r m a t i o n o r o t h e r r o u t i n g i n f o r m a t i o n a n y m a n n e r
c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n b u l k e l e c t r o n i c m a i l t h r o u g h o r i n t o t h e c o m p u t e r n e t w o r k e l e c t r o n i c m a i l s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r i t s s u b s c r i b e r s .
2 5 . D e f e n d a n t s ' t r a n s m i s s i o n s w e r e c o n t r a v e n t i o n t h e a u t h o r i t y g r a n t e d i n v i o l a t i o n t h e p o l i c i e s s e t P l a i n t i f f . D e f e n d a n t s h a d k n o w l e d g e t h e a u t h o r i t y
p o l i c i e s t h o s e e m a i l s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r s , t h e a u t h o r i t y p o l i c i e s w e r e a v a i l a b l e P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s w e b s i t e .
2 6 . r e s u l t D e f e n d a n t s ' a c t i o n s , P l a i n t i f f h a s s u f f e r e d i n j u r y , a n d e n t i t l e d t o i n j u n c t i o n , a n d r e c o v e r a c t u a l d a m a g e s , i n l i e u t h e r e o f $ 1 f o r e a c h a n d e v e r y
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 8 of 10
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
9/46
u n s o l i c i t e d b u l k e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e t r a n s m i t t e d v i o l a t i o n t h e s t a t u t e , $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 p e r d a y a n y o f f e n d i n g m e s s a g e w a s t r a n s m i t t e d , p l u s a t t o r n e y s ' f e e s a n d c o s t s s u i t .
P R A Y E R F O R R E L I E F W H E R E F O R E , P l a i n t i f f r e q u e s t s e n t r y o f j u d g m e n t i t s f a v o r a n d a g a i n s t
D e f e n d a n t s :
G r a n t i n g p r e l i m i n a r y a n d p e r m a n e n t i n j u n c t i v e r e l i e f a g a i n s t D e f e n d a n t s , a n d a l l t h o s e i n p r i v i t y a c t i n g c o n c e r t w i t h D e f e n d a n t s , e n j o i n i n g t h e m f r o m d i r e c t l y i n d i r e c t l y v i o l a t i n g t h e t e r m s t h e C A N - S P A M A c t t h e t e r m s t h e V i r g i n i a a n t i - s p a m s t a t u t e ;
A w a r d i n g P l a i n t i f f c o m p e n s a t o r y a n d p u n i t i v e d a m a g e s a m o u n t p r o v e n t r i a l ;
A w a r d i n g P l a i n t i f f a t t o r n e y s ' f e e s a n d c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h p r o s e c u t i n g t h i s a c t i o n ; a n d
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 9 of 10
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
10/46
G r a n t i n g P l a i n t i f f s u c h o t h e r a d d i t i o n a l r e l i e f t h i s C o u r t d e e m s j u s t a n d p r o p e r u n d e r t h e c i r c u m s t a n c e s .
D a t e d : A p r i l 2 & , 2 0 0 7 R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,
I N T E R N E T L A W G R O U P J o n P r a e d ( V S B # 4 0 6 7 8 ) 4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B o u l e v a r d , S u i t e 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n , V i r g i n i a 2 2 2 0 3 ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 0
A t t o r n e y s f o r P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a o f U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c .
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 10 of 10
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
11/46
& J S 4 4 ( R e v . C I V I L C O V E R S H E E T T h e J S - 4 4 c i v i l c o v e r s h e e t a n d t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d h e r e i n n e i t h e r r e p l a c e n o r s u p p l a n e n t t h e f i l i n e a n d s e r v i c e p i e l a w e x c e p t p r o v i d e d l o c a l r u l e s c o u r t , T h f e f o r m , a p p r o v e d b y t h e J u d i c i a l C o n f e r e n c e t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s s i p j o l > e r l " 9 7 4 r a u F r ^ 7 o 7 t n c u s e t h e C l e r k o f C o u r t f o r t h e p u r p o s e i n i t i a t i n g t h e c i v i l d o c k e t s h e e t . ( S E E I N S T R U C T I O N S T H E R E V E R S E S l 7 T I E F Q R M . ; > A o r y w ( a ) P L A I N T I F F S
P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . ,
( b ) C o u u y R e s i d e n c e F i r s t L i s t e d P l a i n t i f f P a r k C i t y , U t a h ( E X C E P T U . S . P L A I N T I F F C A S E S )
D E F E N D A N T S J o h n D o e s
o r o t h e r p a p e r s r e q u i r e ?
r } 2 2 0 0 7
C o u n t y o f R e s i d e n c e F i r s t L i s l a i D e f e n d a n t U n k n o w n ( I N U . S . P L A I N T I F F C A S E S O N L Y ) N O T E : L A N D C O N D E M N A T I O N C A S E S . U S E T H E L O C A T I O N T H E
L A N D I N V O L V E D .
( c ) A t t o r n e y s ( F i r m N a m e , A d d r e s s , a n d T e l e p h o n e N u m b e r ) A l t o m e y s ( I f K n o w n ) I n t o m e l L a w G r o u p J o n P r a o e ! ( V S B 4 0 6 7 8 ) 4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B l v d . , S u i t s 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n . 2 2 2 0 3 ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 2 ; ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 6 2 ( r a x )
I I . B A S I S J U R I S D I C T I O N
U . S . G o v e r n m e n t 3 F e d e r a l Q u e s t i o n P l a i n t i f f ( U . S . G o v e r n m e n t N o t P a r t y )
U . S . G o v e r n m e n t D i v e r s i t y D e f e n d a n t ( I n d i c a t e C i t i z e n s h i p P a r t i e s
I t e m I D )
I I I . C I T I Z E N S H I P P R I N C I P A L P A R T l E S < P i a c c a n - x - i n O n c B o x f o r P i a i n t i f f ( F o r D i v c r s i C a s e s l y ) a n d O n e B o x f D c f c r . d a m )
P T F D E F P T F D E F C i t i z e n T h i s S t a t e I n c o r p o o t e d o r P r i n c i p a l P l a c e
B u s i n e s s T h i s S t a t e
C i t i z e n o f A n o t h e r S t a l e I n c o r p o r a t e d a n d P r i n c i p a l P l a c e B u s i n e s s A n o t h e r S l a t e
C i t i z e n o r S u b j e c t u f a F o r e i g n N a t i o n F o r e i g n C o u n t r y
I V . N A T U R E S U I T ( P l a c e " X " O n e B o x O n l y ) C O N T R A C T T O R T S F O R F E I T U R E / P E N A L T Y B A N K R U P T C Y O T H E R S T A T U T E S
1 1 0 I n s u r a n c e 1 2 0 M . i t i n : 1 3 0 M i l l e r A c t 1 4 0 N e g o t i a b l e I n s t r u m e n t 1 5 0 R c c o v z r y o f O v c r p a y m c n l
E n f o r c e m e n t J u d g m c n 1 5 1 M e d i c a r e A c t 1 5 2 R e c o v e r y D e f a u l c d
S t u d e n t L o a n * ( E x c l . V e t e r a n s )
1 5 } R e c o v e r y o f O v e r p a y m e n t o f V e t e r a n * B e n e f i t s
1 6 0 S t o c k h o l d e r s ' S u i t s 1 9 0 O t h e r C o n t r a c t 1 9 5 C o n t r a c t r o d u c i L i a b i h t y
P E R S O N A L I N J U R Y 3 1 0 A i r p l a n e 3 1 5 A i r p l a n e P r o d u c t
L i a b i l i t y 3 2 0 A s s a u l t , L i b e l
S l a n d e r 3 3 0 F e d e r a l E m p l o y s '
L i a b i l i t y 3 4 0 M a r i n e 3 4 3 M a r i n e P r o d u c t
L i a b i l i t y 3 5 0 M o t o r V e h i c l e 3 5 5 M o t o r V e h i c l e
P r o d u c t L i a b i l i t y 3 6 0 O t h e r P e r s o n a l I n j u r y
P E R S O N A L I N J U R Y 3 6 2 P e r s o n a l I n j u r y
M c d . M a l p r a c t i c e 3 6 5 P e r s o n a l I n j u r y
P r o d u c t L i a b i l i t y 3 K A t b e e t t u P e r s o n a l
I n j u r y P r o d u c t L i a b i l i t y
P E R S O N A L P R O P E R T Y 3 7 0 O t h e r F r a u d 3 7 1 T r u t h L e n d i n g 3 8 0 O t h e r P c n o n a l
P r o p e r l y D a m a g e 3 8 5 P r o p e r l y m a g s
P r o d u c t L i a b i l i t y
6 1 0 A g r i c u l t u r e 6 2 0 O t h e r F o o d & D r u g 6 2 5 D r u g R e l a t e d S c i z t i r e
P r o p e r t y U S C 6 3 0 l i q u o r L a w k 6 4 0 R . R . T r u c k 6 5 0 A i r l h c R e g s . 6 6 0 O c c u p a t i o n a l
S a f e l y / H e a l t h 6 9 0 O t h e r
4 2 2 A p p e a l 2 8 U S C 1 5 S 4 2 3 W i t h d r a w a l
U S C 1 5 7 P R O P E R T Y R I G H T S 8 2 0 C o p y r i g h t s 8 3 0 P a t e n t
T r a i l c m a r l t
L A B O R S O C I A L S E C U R I T Y
R E A L P R O P E R T Y C I V I L R I G H T S 2 1 0 L a n d C o n d e m n a t i o n 2 2 0 F o r e c l o s u r e 2 3 0 R e n t l e a s e E j e c t m e n t 2 4 0 T o r n L a n d 2 4 5 T o r t r o d u c t L i a b i l i t y 2 9 0 A l l O l h c R e a l P r o p c r l y
4 4 1 V o t i n g 4 4 2 E m p l o y m e n t 4 4 3 H o u s i n g /
A c c o m m o d a t i o n s 4 4 4 W e l f a r e 4 4 0 O t h e r C i v i l R i g h t s
P R I S O N E R P E T I T I O N S 5 1 0 o t i o m i c a t c
S e n t e n c e H a b e i s C o r p u s : 5 3 0 G e n e r a l 5 3 5 D e a t h P e n a l l y 5 4 0 M a n d a m u s O t h e r 5 5 0 C i v i l R i g h t s 5 < J P r i s o n C o n d i t i o n
7 1 0 F a i r L a b o r S n n d a r d s A c t
7 2 0 L a b o r / M g m t . R e l a t i o n s
7 3 0 L a b o r / M g m t . R e p o r t i n g D i s c l o s u r e A c t
7 4 0 R a i l w a y L a b o r A c t
7 9 0 O t h e r L a b o r l i l i j a t b n
7 O | E m p l . R c l . I n c . S e c u r i t y A c t
K 6 I ( 1 3 9 5 m K 6 2 B l a c k L u n g ( 9 2 3 ) K 6 3 D l W C / D I W ( 4 0 5 ( g ) ) 8 6 4 S 3 I D T i l e X V I 8 6 5 R S I ( 4 0 5 ( g ) (
F E D E R A L T A X S U I T S 8 7 0 T a x e s ( U S . P l a i n t i f f
D c f c n d a n l )
8 7 1 I R S T h i r d P a r t y U S C 7 6 0 9
4 0 0 S t a l e R e a p p o r t i a n m c n l 4 1 0 A n l i l n s t 4 3 0 B a n k s a n d B a n k i n g 4 5 0 C o m m c r e c / I C C R a l e s / e t c . 4 6 0 D e p o r t a t i o n 4 7 0 R a c k e t e e r I n f l u e n c e d a r d
C o r r u p t O r | i a n i z i l i o . i s K I 0 S e l e c t s S e r v i c e X 5 0 S c c u r i l c s / C o m m o d i t b s . '
E x c h a n g e 8 7 5 C u s t o e i c r h a l l c u g c
U S C 3 4 1 0 8 9 1 A g r i c u l t u r a l A c l > 8 9 2 E c o n o m i c S u b H i z a i b n A c t 8 9 3 E n v i r o n m e n t a l M a i l e r s K 9 4 E n e r g y A l b c a t i o n A c t 8 9 5 F r e e d o m
I n f o r m a t i o n A c t 9 0 0 A p p e a l o f F o e D e t e r m i n a t i o n
U n d e r E q u a l A c c e s s J u s t i c e
9 5 0 C o n s t i t u t i o n a l i t y S t a t e S t n l u t c . 1
8 9 0 O t h e r S t a t u t o r y A c t i o n s
( P L A C E " X " O N E B O X O N L Y ) O R I G I N O r i g i n a l P r o c e e d i n g
R e m o v e d f r o m S l a t e C o u r t
R e m a n d e d f r o m R e i n s t a t e d A p p e l l a t e C o u r t R e o p e n e d
c U . S . C i v i l S n t u t c u n d e r w h i c h y o u a r c ( i : g a n d w r i t e b s ' c f s t a k m c n l o f c a u s e .
T r a n s f e r r e d f r o m a n o t h e r d i s t r i c t ( s p e c i f y ) M u l t i d i s t r i c i
L i t i g a t i o n
A p p e a l D i s t r i c t J u d g e f r o m M a g i s t r a t e J u d g m e n t
V I . C A U S E O F A C T I O N n o t c i t e j u r i s d i c t i o n a l s t a t u t e s u n l e s s i v c r s i t y . ) F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t
V I I . R E Q U E S T E D C H E C K T H I S C L A S S A C T I O N D E M a F J D T C O M P L A I N T : U N D E R F . R . C P . 2 3
V I I I . R E L A T E D C A S E ( S ) ( S e c i n s t r u c t i o n s ) : A N Y j u d g e
C l l l i C K Y l i b a l l y d e m a n d e d c o m p l a n l : J U R Y D E M A N D : V c s
D O C K E T N U M B E R
A P P L Y I N G I F P M A O . J U D G E
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1-2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
12/46
q p f c e r n e t L a w G r o u p
R E C E I V E D
4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B o u i e v a r d S u i t e 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n , V i r g i n i a 2 2 2 0 3 w w w . i - l a w g r o u p . c o m t e l . 7 0 3 . 2 4 3 . 8 1 0 0 f a x . 7 0 3 . 2 4 3 . 8 1 6 2 C L E R K 0 1 S T K I C 1 C O U R T A L E X A N D R I A . V I R G I N I A
A p r i l 2 6 , 2 0 0 7
V i a H a n d D e l i v e r y
C l e r k t h e C o u r t C i v i l D i v i s i o n , E D V A 4 0 1 C o u r t h o u s e S q u a r e A l e x a n d r i a , 2 2 3 1 4 - 5 7 0 4
R e : P r o j e c t H o n e v P o t J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s . T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m . A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ( 1 : 0 7 C V 4 1 9 )
D e a r C l e r k :
P l e a s e f i n d e n c l o s e d c h e c k o f $ 3 5 0 f o r t h e f i l i n g f e e f o r t h e C o m p l a i n t t h e a b o v e c a s e . T h e C o m p l a i n t w a s f i l e d m i s t a k e n l y w i t h o u t t h e f i l i n g f e e t h i s m o r n i n g .
y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s o r c o n c e r n s , p l e a s e c o n t a c t 7 0 3 - 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 2 .
T h a n k y o u f o r y o u r a s s i s t a n c e .
V e r y t r u l y y o u r s ,
' J o n P r a e d I n t e r n e t L a w G r o u p
E n c l o s u r e s
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
13/46
U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N
P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m 2 0 0 1 A P R A 0 T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . , C L E R K D i S T I U C I C O U R T
P l a i n t i f f A L E X A N D R I A . V I R G I N I A
C I V I L A C T I O N N U M B E R J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s O " 7 4 - W
H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,
D e f e n d a n t .
M o t i o n f o r L i m i t e d A u t h o r i t y t o C o n d u c t D i s c o v e r y N e c e s s a r y t o I d e n t i f y a n d S e r v e D e f e n d a n t a n d N o t i c e H e a r i n g
P u r s u a n t F e d e r a l R u l e o f C i v i l P r o c e d u r e 2 6 ( d ) , P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . , h e r e b y m o v e s t h e C o u r t f o r l i m i t e d a u t h o r i t y c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h a s s u b m i t t e d s h o r t M e m o r a n d u m s u p p o r t i t s M o t i o n . P L E A S E T A K E N O T I C E t h a t M a y 4 , 2 0 0 7 1 0 : 0 0 a . m . , s o o n t h e r e a f t e r t h e m a t t e r m a y h e a r d , P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , i t s C o u n s e l , w i l l p r e s e n t o r a l a r g u m e n t s u p p o r t i t s m o t i o n f o r l i m i t e d a u t h o r i t y c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t .
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
14/46
D a t e d : A p r i l ^ _ , 2 0 0 7 R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,
I N T E R N E T L A W G R O U P J o n P r a e d ( V S B # 4 0 6 7 8 ) 4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B o u l e v a r d , S u i t e 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n , V i r g i n i a 2 2 2 0 3 ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 0
A t t o r n e y f o r P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
15/46
U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A
A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N
P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a o f U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . ,
P l a i n t i f f ,
C I V I L A C T I O N N U M B E R J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s
H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,
D e f e n d a n t .
[ P R O P O S E D l O R D E R T h i s m a t t e r h a v i n g b e e n f u l l y b r i e f e d , a n d t h e C o u r t b e i n g f u l l y a p p r i s e d
t h e f a c t s a n d l a w t h i s m a t t e r , H E R E B Y O R D E R E D u n d e r R u l e 2 6 ( d ) t h a t P l a i n t i f f s M o t i o n f o r L i m i t e d A u t h o r i t y C o n d u c t D i s c o v e r y N e c e s s a r y t o I d e n t i f y a n d S e r v e D e f e n d a n t s H E R E B Y G R A N T E D . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t s h a l l h a v e u n t i l
c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t J o h n D o e s .
U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t V i r g i n i a
A p r i l , 2 0 0 7
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 2-2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
16/46
U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F I L E D F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A
A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N
2 0 0 1 A P R 1 0 : P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m C Q U R T T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . A L E X A N D R I A . V I R G I N I A
P l a i n t i f f ,
N o . \ \ O i o s f J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s
H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,
D e f e n d a n t s .
M e m o r a n d u m S u p p o r t P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s M o t i o n f o r L i m i t e d A u t h o r i t y C o n d u c t D i s c o v e r y N e c e s s a r y I d e n t i f y a n d S e r v e D e f e n d a n t
t h i s m o t i o n , P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c .
r e s p e c t f u l l y r e q u e s t s o r d e r a u t h o r i z i n g c o n d u c t l i m i t e d d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y
a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t J o h n D o e s .
F a c t u a l B a c k g r o u n d
B e t w e e n J a n u a r y 2 0 0 5 a n d A p r i l 2 0 0 7 , J o h n D o e s p a m m e r s t r a n s m i t t e d o v e r 6 . 1
m i l l i o n s p a m m e s s a g e s t e n s t h o u s a n d s u n i q u e e m a i l a d d r e s s e s b e l o n g i n g P H P m e m b e r s t h a t h a v e d o n a t e d r e c o r d t o , a n d a r e r e c e i v i n g a n t i - s p a m p r o t e c t i o n f r o m ,
P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t . A l l t h e s e e m a i l a d d r e s s e s w e r e i l l e g a l l y h a r v e s t e d t h e s p a m m e r ( o r o n e
h i s c o - c o n s p i r a t o r s ) f r o m w e b s i t e h o s t i n g P H P h o n e y p o t , w e r e t h e s u b j e c t d i c t i o n a r y
s p a m a t t a c k s t h a t i n d i s c r i m i n a t e l y t a r g e t e d r a n d o m u s e r n a m e s h o s t e d w i t h i n I n t e r n e t d o m a i n
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 4
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
17/46
n a m e s t h a t h a v e d o n a t e d r e c o r d t o , a n d a r e r e c e i v i n g a n t i - s p a m p r o t e c t i o n f r o m , P r o j e c t
H o n e y P o t . T h e s p a m c o n t a i n e d f a l s e m i s l e a d i n g t r a n s m i s s i o n i n f o r m a t i o n , d i d n o t c o n t a i n
f u n c t i o n i n g r e t u r n e l e c t r o n i c m a i l a d d r e s s o r o t h e r I n t e r n e t - b a s e d m e c h a n i s m , c l e a r l y a n d
c o n s p i c u o u s l y d i s p l a y e d , t h a t r e c i p i e n t c o u l d u s e s u b m i t , m a n n e r s p e c i f i e d t h e
m e s s a g e , r e p l y e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e o t h e r f o r m o f I n t e r n e t - b a s e d c o m m u n i c a t i o n
r e q u e s t i n g n o t r e c e i v e f u t u r e c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e s f r o m t h a t s e n d e r t h e
e l e c t r o n i c m a i l a d d r e s s w h e r e t h e m e s s a g e w a s r e c e i v e d , a n d f a i l e d p r o v i d e : ( i ) c l e a r a n d
c o n s p i c u o u s i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t h a t t h e m e s s a g e w a s a d v e r t i s e m e n t o r s o l i c i t a t i o n ; ( i i ) c l e a r a n d
c o n s p i c u o u s n o t i c e t h a t t h e r e c i p i e n t c o u l d d e c l i n e r e c e i v e f u r t h e r c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l
m e s s a g e s f r o m t h e s e n d e r ; a n d ( i i i ) v a l i d p h y s i c a l p o s t a l a d d r e s s t h e s e n d e r a n d t h e r e b y
v i o l a t e d t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t . F u r t h e r m o r e D e f e n d a n t s u s e d a c o m p u t e r c o m p u t e r n e t w o r k w i t h t h e i n t e n t f a l s i f y f o r g e e l e c t r o n i c m a i l t r a n s m i s s i o n i n f o r m a t i o n o r o t h e r
r o u t i n g i n f o r m a t i o n a n y m a n n e r c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n b u l k e l e c t r o n i c m a i l
t h r o u g h i n t o t h e c o m p u t e r n e t w o r k e l e c t r o n i c m a i l s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r i t s s u b s c r i b e r s a n d
t r a n s m i t t e d t h e s p a m c o n t r a v e n t i o n t h e a u t h o r i t y g r a n t e d v i o l a t i o n t h e p o l i c i e s
s e t P l a i n t i f f . D e f e n d a n t s h a d k n o w l e d g e t h e a u t h o r i t y o r p o l i c i e s t h o s e e m a i l s e r v i c e
p r o v i d e r s , o r t h e a u t h o r i t y p o l i c i e s w e r e a v a i l a b l e P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s w e b s i t e t h e r e b y
v i o l a t i n g t h e V i r g i n i a ' s A n t i - S p a m S t a t u t e .
P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h a s c o l l e c t e d l a r g e v o l u m e o f p u b l i c l y a v a i l a b l e i n f o r m a t i o n
t h a t r e l e v a n t t h e i d e n t i t y t h e J o h n D o e s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h i s c o n d u c t . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s
i n v e s t i g a t i o n d a t e h a s i d e n t i f i e d n u m b e r t h i r d p a r t i e s t h a t a r e l i k e l y h a v e n o n - p u b l i c
i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t c o u l d u s e d i d e n t i f y t h e r e s p o n s i b l e p e r s o n . M a n y t h e s e t h i r d p a r t i e s h a v e a g r e e d r e t a i n t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n a n d p r o d u c e i t , b u t o n l y u p o n r e c e i p t a s u b p o e n a .
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 4
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
18/46
P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h a s g o o d r e a s o n b e l i e v e t h a t w i l l a b l e i d e n t i f y , n a m e a n d s e r v e J o h n
D o e D e f e n d a n t s g r a n t e d t h e p o w e r c o n d u c t f o r m a l d i s c o v e r y f o r 1 2 0 d a y s .
L e g a l A r g u m e n t
U n d e r R u l e 2 6 ( d ) , d i s c o v e r y m a y n o t n o r m a l l y b e g i n " b e f o r e t h e p a r t i e s h a v e
c o n f e r r e d r e q u i r e d R u l e 2 6 ( f ) . " B e c a u s e D e f e n d a n t t h i s c a s e u n k n o w n P l a i n t i f f , t h e
c o n f e r e n c e c o n t e m p l a t e d R u l e 2 6 ( f ) c a n n o t o c c u r . T h i s l i m i t a t i o n t h e i n i t i a t i o n
d i s c o v e r y , h o w e v e r , c a n w a i v e d u n d e r R u l e 2 6 ( d ) C o u r t o r d e r .
C o u r t s r e c o g n i z e t h a t , i n c e r t a i n s i t u a t i o n s , t h e i d e n t i t y D e f e n d a n t m a y n o t k n o w n p r i o r t h e f i l i n g c o m p l a i n t . s u c h c i r c u m s t a n c e s , c o u r t s a u t h o r i z e p l a i n t i f f
u n d e r t a k e d i s c o v e r y i d e n t i f y t h e u n k n o w n d e f e n d a n t . I n G o r d o n L e e k e . 5 7 4 F . 2 d 1 1 4 7 ,
1 1 5 2 ( 4 t h C i r . 1 9 7 8 ) , t h e F o u r t h C i r c u i t e x p l a i n e d t h a t , p l a i n t i f f s t a t e s m e r i t o r i o u s c l a i m
a g a i n s t u n k n o w n d e f e n d a n t , t h e C o u r t s h o u l d a l l o w p l a i n t i f f t o a s c e r t a i n t h e i d e n t i t y t h e
u n k n o w n d e f e n d a n t t h r o u g h d i s c o v e r y .
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 3 of 4
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
19/46
W H E R E F O R E , f o r t h e f o r e g o i n g r e a s o n s a n d a n y a d d i t i o n a l r e a s o n s t h a t m a y p r o v i d e d t h e h e a r i n g t h i s m o t i o n , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t r e s p e c t f u l l y r e q u e s t s p e r m i s s i o n u n d e r
R u l e 2 6 ( d ) c o n d u c t s u c h d i s c o v e r y m a y n e c e s s a r y t o i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t J o h n
D o e s . a p p r o p r i a t e o r d e r a t t a c h e d f o r t h e C o u r t ' s s i g n a t u r e .
D a t e d : A p r i l 2 b , 2 0 0 7 R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,
I N T E R N E T L A W G R O U P J o n P r a e d ( V S B # 4 0 6 7 8 ) 4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B o u l e v a r d , S u i t e 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n , V i r g i n i a 2 2 2 0 3 ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 0
A t t o r n e y f o r P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 4 of 4
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
20/46
U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N
P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m 2 0 0 1 A P R A 0 T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . , C L E R K D i S T I U C I C O U R T
P l a i n t i f f A L E X A N D R I A . V I R G I N I A
C I V I L A C T I O N N U M B E R J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s O " 7 4 - W
H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,
D e f e n d a n t .
M o t i o n f o r L i m i t e d A u t h o r i t y t o C o n d u c t D i s c o v e r y N e c e s s a r y t o I d e n t i f y a n d S e r v e D e f e n d a n t a n d N o t i c e H e a r i n g
P u r s u a n t F e d e r a l R u l e o f C i v i l P r o c e d u r e 2 6 ( d ) , P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . , h e r e b y m o v e s t h e C o u r t f o r l i m i t e d a u t h o r i t y c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h a s s u b m i t t e d s h o r t M e m o r a n d u m s u p p o r t i t s M o t i o n . P L E A S E T A K E N O T I C E t h a t M a y 4 , 2 0 0 7 1 0 : 0 0 a . m . , s o o n t h e r e a f t e r t h e m a t t e r m a y h e a r d , P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , i t s C o u n s e l , w i l l p r e s e n t o r a l a r g u m e n t s u p p o r t i t s m o t i o n f o r l i m i t e d a u t h o r i t y c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t .
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 4 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
21/46
D a t e d : A p r i l ^ _ , 2 0 0 7 R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,
I N T E R N E T L A W G R O U P J o n P r a e d ( V S B # 4 0 6 7 8 ) 4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B o u l e v a r d , S u i t e 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n , V i r g i n i a 2 2 2 0 3 ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 0
A t t o r n e y f o r P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 4 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
22/46
U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A
A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N
P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a o f U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . ,
P l a i n t i f f ,
C I V I L A C T I O N N U M B E R J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s
H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,
D e f e n d a n t .
[ P R O P O S E D l O R D E R T h i s m a t t e r h a v i n g b e e n f u l l y b r i e f e d , a n d t h e C o u r t b e i n g f u l l y a p p r i s e d
t h e f a c t s a n d l a w t h i s m a t t e r , H E R E B Y O R D E R E D u n d e r R u l e 2 6 ( d ) t h a t P l a i n t i f f s M o t i o n f o r L i m i t e d A u t h o r i t y C o n d u c t D i s c o v e r y N e c e s s a r y t o I d e n t i f y a n d S e r v e D e f e n d a n t s H E R E B Y G R A N T E D . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t s h a l l h a v e u n t i l
c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t J o h n D o e s .
U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t V i r g i n i a
A p r i l , 2 0 0 7
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 5 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
August 24, 2007
May
2
/s/
Liam OGrady
United States Magistrate Judge
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
23/46
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
__________________________________________
)
Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) No. 1:07CV419
)
)
John Does Injuring PHP and its Members )By Harvesting Email Addresses, )
Transmitting Spam, )
And Posting Comment Spam, ))
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY NECESSARY TO
IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS, AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND
SERVE DEFENDANTS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on September 7, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter
as the matter may be heard, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP), by its Counsel, will present oral
argument in support of its Motion to Extend Time to Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify
and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m) Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants.
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 26(d), PHP hereby moves the
Court to extend the time to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve, and to extend the
deadline to name and serve the John Doe Defendants. PHP has submitted a short Memorandum
in support of its Motion.
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 6 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
24/46
Dated: August 30, 2007 Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Jon L. Praed
VSB #40678Attorney for Plaintiff Project Honey Pot
Internet Law Group
4121 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 101
Arlington, Virginia 22203
Phone: (703) 243-8100
Fax: (703) 243-8162
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 6 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
25/46
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
__________________________________________
)
Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) No. 1:07CV419
)
)
John Does Injuring PHP and its Members )By Harvesting Email Addresses, )
Transmitting Spam, )
And Posting Comment Spam, ))
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY NECESSARY TO
IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS, AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND
SERVE DEFENDANTS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on September 7, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter
as the matter may be heard, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP), by its Counsel, will present oral
argument in support of its Motion to Extend Time to Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify
and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m) Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants.
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 26(d), PHP hereby moves the
Court to extend the time to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve, and to extend the
deadline to name and serve the John Doe Defendants. PHP has submitted a short Memorandum
in support of its Motion.
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 7 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
26/46
Dated: August 30, 2007 Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Jon L. Praed
VSB #40678Attorney for Plaintiff Project Honey Pot
Internet Law Group
4121 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 101
Arlington, Virginia 22203
Phone: (703) 243-8100
Fax: (703) 243-8162
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 7 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
27/46
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
__________________________________________)
Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., ))
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) No. 1:07CV419)
John Does Injuring PHP and its Members )
By Harvesting Email Addresses, )Transmitting Spam, )
And Posting Comment Spam, )
)Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCT
DISCOVERY NECESSARY TO IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS,
AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND SERVE DEFENDANTS
By this motion, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP) respectfully requests an order
extending time to conduct limited discovery necessary to identify and serve the John Doe
defendants, and to extend the deadline under Rule 4(m) to name and serve the John Doe
defendants.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
As noted in the Complaint, spam is a global problem of epidemic proportions.
When this lawsuit was filed in late April 2007, PHP had received over 6 million spam messages
during its 28 months of operations (an average of 217 thousand messages per month). In the four
months since the lawsuit was filed, PHP as received an average of nearly 1 million new spam
messages each month. While much of that growth is due to a substantial increase in the number
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 7
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
28/46
2
of email addresses managed by PHP (and therefore available to receive spam), the fact remains
that spammers are continuing to operate at an alarming pace and show no signs of abating in the
near future. They will most certainly not stop unless lawsuits of this sort are afforded the time
needed to complete the hard work necessary to obtain the real identity of those responsible.
The spam messages PHP has received all have one thing in common they
advertise a host of purported products and services being sold at thousands of different websites
located on computers all over the world. Of the 10 million messages PHP has received to date,
however, perhaps the most pernicious have been those advertising illegal online pharmacies.
The John Does responsible for these pharmacy spam messages are little more than high-tech
drug traffickers. They sell counterfeit or fake prescription drugs to unwitting consumers without
the benefit of a reputable doctors prescription. They sell their drugs at prices typically well
below those charged by brick and mortar drugstores that are managed by licensed pharmacists
(who are closely regulated by state and federal authorities and who dispense authentic drugs
tested and approved by the FDA).
The harm caused by these drug-trafficking spammers is real. A number of public
reports in recent days have focused on the growing problem of pharmacy spam, the injuries
traced to it, and the difficulties encountered by those who try to identify the killers behind the
business.1
Because of the dangerous nature of spam advertising illegal online pharmacies,
PHP has focused its discovery to date on the John Does responsible for this type of spam. To
1Pharmacists Warn of Buying Drugs Online After Death Reported, CBCNews.com, March 21, 2007 (available at ); Spam Hunter,
Forbes.com, July 23, 2007 (available at < http://www.forbes.com/business/free_forbes/2007/0723/054.html>)
(profiling the unsuccessful attempts by the head of technology at a major spam-filtering company to track pharmacy
spam to its source); andDamn Spam: The Losing War on Junk Email, The New Yorker, August 6, 2007 (available
at < http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/08/06/070806fa_fact_specter>) (noting negative trends in the long
fight against spam).
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 7
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
29/46
3
date, we have issued nearly three dozen subpoenas to third parties that provided services of one
form or another to the John Does. Our discovery has revealed many significant facts. We have
identified over 10,000 different domain names appearing in spam that lead to online pharmacies
operating under questionable circumstances. We have mapped those 10,000+ domain names to
fewer than 200 specific Internet fingerprints.2 Most importantly, nearly 90% of the domain
names can be mapped to less than two dozen fingerprints, and approximately half of these
fingerprints are connected to only one hand3 that represents over 50% of the entire online
pharmacy spam problem today.
While the John Does behind nearly every one of these fingerprints are going to
extreme lengths to hide their identity, nearly all of them remain vulnerable to identification
through the use of civil discovery. All of the major fingerprints are using Visa credit card
merchant accounts to process consumer purchases on their websites. In addition, nearly all of
the fingerprints have other substantial connections to the United States, including the use of IP
addresses, domain name registrars, telephone numbers, and email addresses that are serviced by
United States-based entities.
While we have learned much about the individuals responsible for the advertising
of illegal online pharmacies, our discovery has also encountered a number of roadblocks. Some
were predictable, such as the use of stolen credit cards and Web Money4 to buy some services
that are essential to the operation of their illegal online pharmacies. Other roadblocks were not
anticipated. For example, several merchants that sold essential services to the John Does have
2 A fingerprint consists of any set of data that is likely to uniquely define an online pharmacy operation, and that
serves to distinguish it from other online pharmacy operations. The data we consider includes the domain name
hosting the site, the look and feel of the site, the technical data underlying the site, and any data points about the site
that we may acquire through subpoena or other investigative means.3 A hand is a collection of fingerprints that are unique from each other, but have connections between them.4 Web Money is a form of online currency that is operated by a company headquartered in Moscow
(http://www.wmtransfer.com/).
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 3 of 7
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
30/46
4
refused to produce the John Does payment information without a protective order in place. We
hope to complete negotiations over such an order in the near future. Other third parties have
failed to respond to our subpoenas, including a major credit card issuer that has failed to produce
valuable merchant account information closely tied to the John Does. While we believe the bank
will respond in time, a motion to compel may unfortunately prove necessary.
For all these reasons, PHP respectfully requests it be granted through November
26, 2007 to complete John Doe discovery and to name and serve defendants.
LEGAL ARGUMENT
Courts recognize that, in certain situations, the identity of a defendant may not be
known prior to the filing of a complaint. In such circumstances, courts authorize a plaintiff to
undertake discovery to identify the unknown defendant. In Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147,
1152 (4th Cir. 1978), the Fourth Circuit explained that, if a plaintiff states a meritorious claim
against an unknown defendant, the Court should allow the plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to
ascertain the identity of the unknown defendant through discovery. Paulinus Chidi Njoku v.
Unknown Special Unit Staff, No. 99-7644, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15695, at *2-3 (4th Cir. July
7, 2000) (remanding the case with instructions to afford plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to
properly identify the John Does). This power is codified in Rule 26(d), which permits the Court
to authorize discovery prior to the planning conference contemplated under Rule 26(f).
In addition to authorizing discovery necessary to identify and serve the John Doe
defendants, PHP is also seeking an extension of its deadline to name and serve defendants under
Rule 4(m). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that a plaintiff who shows good cause
for failure to effectuate service within 120 days of filing the complaint is entitled to an
appropriate extension of time to serve. Courts have held that good cause exists and that a
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 4 of 7
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
31/46
5
plaintiff is entitled to additional time to effect service when defendants take affirmative actions
to avoid service of process. For example, in Ruiz-Varela v. Velez, the District Court dismissed
the plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve Defendant Figueroa. 814 F.2d
821 (1st Cir. 1987). Recognizing that Figueroa was attempting to evade personal service by
concealing his whereabouts, the First Circuit vacated the dismissal. Because Figueroa's attempts
to conceal his location were designed to frustrate the plaintiff's ability to effectuate service, the
Court of Appeals explained that dismissal for failure to serve was inappropriate: Evasion of
service by a putative defendant constitutes good cause for failure to serve under Rule 4[m]. Id.
at 824. As noted above, the defendants in this case have gone to extreme measures to evade
identification and service. Their attempts at evasion are an adequate basis for extending PHPs
deadline to name and serve.
This Court should also grant PHP an extension of time to identify and serve the
John Does due to its diligence in prosecuting this matter. Courts have consistently held that a
showing of diligence and a reasonable effort to effect service constitute good cause under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). In re Hall, 222 B.R. 275, 279 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1998)
(citing T & S Rentals v. United States, 164 F.R.D. 422, 426 (N.D. W.Va. 1996) and United
States v. Britt, 170 F.R.D. 8, 10 (D. Md. 1996). In determining the type of diligence or extent of
effort required to warrant an extension of the 120-day deadline, courts have examined the
legislative history of amendments to Rule 4, noting that: Inadvertent or heedless non-service is
what amended Rule 4[m] is aimed at. Congress intended that a plaintiff who had made
reasonable efforts to effect service would be permitted additional time, if needed, under Rule
6(b). Arroyo v. Wheat, 102 F.R.D. 516, 518 (D. Nev. 1984) (citing to cases in which there
was no dilatory or willful delay and in which plaintiffs abortive efforts [were] bona fide, as
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 5 of 7
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
32/46
6
illustrative of situations in which good cause was determined to exist); see also Quann v.
Whitegate-Edgewater, 112 F.R.D. 649, 659 (D. Md. 1986) (citing Arroyo v. Wheat).
PHP has subpoenaed nearly three dozen third parties in possession of information
likely to lead to the identity of the John Doe defendants. This information has provided valuable
leads into the identity of the defendants. PHP plans to continue its John Doe discovery, and also
plans to communicate with other victims of these John Does in an effort to ensure its discovery
does not inadvertently compromise other pending civil and criminal investigations. All of these
reasons constitute good cause for an extension of the deadline to name and serve the John Doe
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons and any additional
reasons that may be adduced on this matter, PHP respectfully asks the Court to grant this
Request and enter an Order substantially in the form of the attached proposed Order.
Dated: August 30, 2007 Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Jon L. Praed
VSB #40678
Attorney for Plaintiff Project Honey Pot
Internet Law Group4121 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 101
Arlington, Virginia 22203
Phone: (703) 243-8100Fax: (703) 243-8162
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 6 of 7
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
33/46
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
__________________________________________
)Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )
Technologies, Inc., )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) No. 1:07CV419
)
)
John Does Injuring PHP and its Members )By Harvesting Email Addresses, )
Transmitting Spam, )And Posting Comment Spam, )
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
[PROPOSED]ORDER GRANTING PROJECT HONEY POTS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY AND TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO NAME AND SERVE DEFENDANTS
This matter having been fully briefed, and the Court being fully apprised of the facts and
law in this matter, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Project Honey Pots Motion to Extend Time to
Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m)
Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants is HEREBY GRANTED. Project Honey Pot shall have
until November 26, 2007 to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve Defendants John
Does.
Date: __________________, 2007 ____________________________________
United States District Court
Eastern District of Virginia
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 7 of 7
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
34/46
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
PROJECT HONEY POT )d/b/a UNSPAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ))
Plaintiff, ))
v. ) CIVIL NO. 1:07cv419)
JOHN DOES, ))
Defendants. ))
O R D E R
For the reasons stated from the bench, and in accord with specific rulings made at that time,
it is
ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to extend time (no. 6) is GRANTED, and discovery
needed to identify the defendants may be conducted through November 26, 2007.
ENTERED this 7 day of September, 2007th
.
/s/Thomas Rawles Jones, Jr.United States Magistrate Judge
Alexandria, Virginia
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 9 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
35/46
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
__________________________________________
)
Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., )
Plaintiff, )
v. ) No. 1:07CV419
)
John Does, )
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY NECESSARY TO
IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS, AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND
SERVE DEFENDANTS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 7, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter
as the matter may be heard, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP), by its counsel, will present oral
argument in support of its Motion to Extend Time to Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify
and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m) Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants.
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 26(d), PHP hereby moves the Court to
extend the time to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve, and to extend the deadline
to name and serve the John Doe Defendants. PHP has submitted a short Memorandum in
support of its Motion.
Dated: November 26, 2007 Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Jon L. Praed
VSB #40678
Attorney for Plaintiff Project Honey Pot
Internet Law Group
4121 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 101
Arlington, Virginia 22203
Phone: (703) 243-8100
Fax: (703) 243-8162
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 10 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
36/46
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
__________________________________________
)Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )
Technologies, Inc., )
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) No. 1:07CV419
)
John Does, )
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
[PROPOSED]ORDER GRANTING PROJECT HONEY POTS MOTION TO EXTEND TIMETO CONDUCT DISCOVERY AND TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO NAME AND SERVE DEFENDANTS
This matter having been fully briefed, and the Court being fully apprised of the facts and
law in this matter, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Project Honey Pots Motion to Extend Time to
Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m)
Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants is HEREBY GRANTED. Project Honey Pot shall have
until January 28, 2008 to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve Defendants John
Does.
Date: __________________, 2007 ____________________________________
United States District Court
Eastern District of Virginia
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 10 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
37/46
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
__________________________________________
)
Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., )
Plaintiff, )
v. ) No. 1:07CV419
)
John Does, )
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY NECESSARY TO
IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS, AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND
SERVE DEFENDANTS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 7, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter
as the matter may be heard, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP), by its counsel, will present oral
argument in support of its Motion to Extend Time to Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify
and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m) Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants.
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 26(d), PHP hereby moves the Court to
extend the time to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve, and to extend the deadline
to name and serve the John Doe Defendants. PHP has submitted a short Memorandum in
support of its Motion.
Dated: November 26, 2007 Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Jon L. Praed
VSB #40678
Attorney for Plaintiff Project Honey Pot
Internet Law Group
4121 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 101
Arlington, Virginia 22203
Phone: (703) 243-8100
Fax: (703) 243-8162
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 11 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 1 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
38/46
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
__________________________________________
)Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )
Technologies, Inc., )
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) No. 1:07CV419
)
John Does, )
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
[PROPOSED]ORDER GRANTING PROJECT HONEY POTS MOTION TO EXTEND TIMETO CONDUCT DISCOVERY AND TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO NAME AND SERVE DEFENDANTS
This matter having been fully briefed, and the Court being fully apprised of the facts and
law in this matter, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Project Honey Pots Motion to Extend Time to
Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m)
Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants is HEREBY GRANTED. Project Honey Pot shall have
until January 28, 2008 to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve Defendants John
Does.
Date: __________________, 2007 ____________________________________
United States District Court
Eastern District of Virginia
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 11 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 2 of 2
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
39/46
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
__________________________________________)
Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., )Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) No. 1:07CV419
)
John Does, )
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCTDISCOVERY NECESSARY TO IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS,
AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND SERVE DEFENDANTS
By this motion, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP) respectfully requests an order
extending time to conduct limited discovery necessary to identify and serve the John Doe
defendants, and to extend the deadline under Rule 4(m) to name and serve the John Doe
defendants.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
As noted in the Complaint, spam is a global problem of epidemic proportions, and
the volumes continue to rise at an alarming rate. When this lawsuit was filed in late April 2007,
PHP had received only 6 million spam messages over the first 28 months of operations (an
average of 217 thousand spam messages per month). In the four months immediately following
the filing of this lawsuit, PHP received an average of nearly 1 million new spam messages each
month. PHP is now receiving well over 1 million spam messages every four days. Much of that
spam advertises illegal online pharmacies that are the focus of this lawsuit. Our analysis of this
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 12 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 1 of 5
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
40/46
2
spam continues to indicate the vast majority of the problem can be traced to fewer than two
dozen professional cyber-gangs.1 Our discovery is also generally consistent with the limited
facts that have been publicly disclosed by others who are researching this illegal conduct.2
Despite their best efforts to hide, PHP believes every one of the professional
gangs remains vulnerable to discovery and exposure through civil legal process. A number of
domestic corporations are unwittingly providing essential services to the criminal gangs. To
name just a few enabling services, every one of the gangs being tracked in this lawsuit has access
to the following essential services:
credit card merchant accounts they are using to charge consumer credit cards,
toll free telephone numbers they advertise as customer service centers, and Internet-based accounts (domain names, webhosting services, email accounts, etc.) that
produce innumerable data points that are controlled by domestic-based corporate entities.
In recent weeks, PHP has successfully pursued several of these domestic
discovery fronts against a number of the largest cyber-gangs. For example, PHP only recently
obtained payment information from an email service provider that was providing email service to
one of the John Does. This John Doe was using the provider to distribute confirmation emails to
buyers. The payment information provided indicates the John Doe paid for this email account
using two debit cards issued by domestic financial institutions. PHP has initiated informal
1 In its previous motion to extend discovery, PHP briefly outlined the technical details that defined its view of the
scope of the pharmacy spam problem and its counsels success in connecting nearly 90% of the problem to less than
two dozen criminal cyber-gang fingerprints. See Memorandum in Support of Motion to Extend John DoeDiscovery, filed August 30, 2007.2Internet Fraud Epidemic Costing Billions of Dollars, The Mercury News, November 9, 2007(available athttp://www.siliconvalley.com/ghostsinthebrowser/ci_7408419?nclick_check=1);
The Hunt for Russias Web Criminals, The Guardian, November 7, 2007 (available at
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/nov/15/news.crime?gusrc=rss&feed=technology);
Shadowy Russian Firm Seen as Conduit for Cybercrime, Washingtonpost.com, October 13, 2007 (available at
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202461.html); and
A Walk on the Dark Side, The Economist, August 30, 2007 (available at
http://economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9723768).
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 12 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 2 of 5
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
41/46
3
contacts with these banks, but has not had the opportunity to issue subpoenas. An extension of
the discovery window is needed to permit PHP to subpoena these banks.
While we have learned much about the individuals responsible for the advertising
of illegal online pharmacies, our discovery continues to encounter roadblocks and the new spam
we are analyzing constantly produces leads that point in helpful, new directions. Additional time
is needed to overcome these roadblocks and to pursue these new discovery paths.
For all these reasons, PHP respectfully requests it be granted a two month
extension to January 28, 2008 to continue John Doe discovery and to name and serve
defendants.
LEGAL ARGUMENT
Courts recognize that, in certain situations, the identity of a defendant may not be
known prior to the filing of a complaint. In such circumstances, courts authorize a plaintiff to
undertake discovery to identify the unknown defendant. In Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147,
1152 (4th Cir. 1978), the Fourth Circuit explained that, if a plaintiff states a meritorious claim
against an unknown defendant, the Court should allow the plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to
ascertain the identity of the unknown defendant through discovery. Paulinus Chidi Njoku v.
Unknown Special Unit Staff, No. 99-7644, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15695, at *2-3 (4th Cir. July
7, 2000) (remanding the case with instructions to afford plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to
properly identify the John Does). This power is codified in Rule 26(d), which permits the Court
to authorize discovery prior to the planning conference contemplated under Rule 26(f).
In addition to authorizing discovery necessary to identify and serve the John Doe
defendants, PHP is also seeking an extension of its deadline to name and serve defendants under
Rule 4(m). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that a plaintiff who shows good cause
Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 12 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 3 of 5
8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does
42/46
4
for failure to effectuate service within 120 days of filing the complaint is entitled to an
appropriate extension of time to serve. Courts have held that good cause exists and that a
plaintiff is entitled to additional time to effect service when defendants take affirmative actions
to avoid service of process. For example, in Ruiz-Varela v. Velez, the District Court dismissed
the plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve Defendant Figueroa. 814 F.2d
821 (1st Cir. 1987). Recognizing that Figueroa was attempting to evade personal service by
concealing his whereabouts, the First Circuit vacated the dismissal. Because Figueroa's attempts
to conceal his location were designed to frustrate the plaintiff's ability to effectuate service, the
Court of Appeals explained that dismissal for failure to serve was inappropriate: Evasion of
service by a putative defendant constitutes good cause for failure to serve under Rule 4[m]. Id.
at 824. As noted above, the defendants in this case have gone to extreme measures to evade
identification and