Project Honey Pot vs John Does

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    1/46

    F I L E D U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T

    F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A , A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N , n f t ,

    P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a o f U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c .

    P l a i n t i f f ,

    N o . J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s K t * / U >

    H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,

    D e f e n d a n t s .

    P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s C o m p l a i n t F o r V i o l a t i o n s t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t a n d t h e V i r g i n i a C o m p u t e r C r i m e s A c t

    S p a m g l o b a l p r o b l e m e p i d e m i c p r o p o r t i o n s , a n d t h e t r e n d l i n e s a r e h e a d e d t h e w r o n g d i r e c t i o n . s o m e e s t i m a t e s , s p a m n o w c o n s t i t u t e s o v e r 9 0 % a l l e m a i l t r a f f i c . U s i n g v a s t n e t w o r k s h i j a c k e d c o m p u t e r s , c o u n t e r f e i t e r s , t h i e v e s a n d h i - t e c h s n a k e - o i l

    s a l e s m e n n o w h a v e i n s t a n t a c c e s s g l o b a l m a r k e t p l a c e . l o n g e r r e l e g a t e d d a r k s t r e e t c o r n e r s , b a s e m e n t l a b s , a n d t h e t r u n k s s e e d y c a r s , i l l e g a l a n d d a n g e r o u s p r o d u c t s a r e n o w o n l y m o u s e c l i c k a w a y f r o m e v e r y I n t e r n e t u s e r . S p a m m e r s d o n ' t e v e n n e e d h a v e p r o d u c t

    s e l l m a k e m o n e y . I d e n t i t y t h i e v e s , e x t o r t i o n i s t s a n d p h i s h e r s h a v e o p e n e d I n t e r n e t s t o r e f r o n t s ,

    a n d u n w i t t i n g v i c t i m s f a l l p r e y t h e m e v e r y d a y w i t h o u t e v e r l e a v i n g t h e i r l i v i n g r o o m s . C h i l d r e n a r e a l s o v i c t i m i z e d s p a m , w h i c h o f f e r s t h e m e a s y a c c e s s i l l i c i t d r u g s , p r e s c r i p t i o n

    d r u g s t h a t n e e d p r e s c r i p t i o n , g a m b l i n g w e b s i t e s , p o r n o g r a p h y , f a k e I D s , s p y w a r e d i s g u i s e d

    c o m p u t e r g a m e s , a n d h o s t o t h e r t e m p t a t i o n s . N a t i o n - s t a t e s , t o o , a r e f a l l i n g v i c t i m s p a m

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 10

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    2/46

    a n d t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l c r i m i n a l g a n g s t h a t a r e i n c r e a s i n g l y b e h i n d i t . G o v e r n m e n t c o r r u p t i o n , f a i l e d l e g a l s y s t e m s a n d s a f e h a v e n r u l e s t h a t g e n e r a t e a s u b s t a n t i a l p o r t i o n t h e n a t i o n - s t a t e ' s G D P a l l c o n t r i b u t e t h e p r o b l e m , a n d a r e a l l b e i n g e x p l o i t e d s p a m m e r s .

    l o n g l i s t l a w s p r o h i b i t s s p a m . P e r h a p s t h e m o s t e l e g a n t t h e c e n t u r i e s o l d c o m m o n l a w o f t r e s p a s s t o c h a t t e l s , w h i c h o n e j u d g e t h i s D i s t r i c t s u g g e s t e d f i t t h e s p a m p r o b l e m l i k e h a n d i n g l o v e . N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g t h a t s u g g e s t i o n , f l u r r y s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l s t a t u t e s h a s b e e n p a s s e d o v e r t h e l a s t d e c a d e a t t e m p t s t o p s p a m ( o r l e a s t s l o w i t s g r o w t h ) w i t h o u t u n d u l y b u r d e n i n g " h a m " ( n o n - s p a m m y e m a i l ) . T h e c u l m i n a t i o n t h i s l e g i s l a t i v e a c t i v i t y w a s t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t o f 2 0 0 3 ( 1 5 U . S . C . 7 7 0 1 e t s e q . ) .

    C A N - S P A M , w a s h o p e d , w o u l d h e l p s t o p s p a m c l a r i f y i n g t h e r u l e s t h a t b u l k e m a i l e r s w e r e s u p p o s e d f o l l o w . T h e r e a l i t y t h a t l e g i t i m a t e e m a i l e r s g e n e r a l l y c o m p l i e d w i t h C A N - S P A M l o n g b e f o r e w a s e n a c t e d , l e a s t c o m p l i e d t h e d e g r e e t h a t t h e i d e n t i t y s o m e o n e w h o a c c e p t e d r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e m a i l i n g c o u l d f o u n d t h e f a c e t h e m e s s a g e i t s e l f . S p a m d i f f e r e n t . i t s f a c e , s p a m n e v e r i d e n t i f i e s a n y o n e w i l l i n g a c c e p t r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e m a i l i n g . T h e r e a s o n s i m p l e - s p a m v i o l a t e s t h e m o s t b a s i c s t a n d a r d s g o o d c o n d u c t . O n c e i d e n t i f i e d , s p a m m e r s c a n n o t d e f e n d t h e i r " b u s i n e s s " p r a c t i c e s a n y o n e , l e t a l o n e a n u p s t r e a m w e b h o s t , e m a i l s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r j u d i c i a l f a c t f i n d e r .

    t h e r e w e r e e v e r a n y d o u b t , t o d a y c l e a r t h a t t h e k e y s t o p p i n g s p a m i d e n t i f y i n g t h o s e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r i t , a n d g e t t i n g t h a t i n f o r m a t i o n i n t o t h e h a n d s t h o s e w i l l i n g

    a n d a b l e s o m e t h i n g a b o u t i t .

    D i s c o v e r i n g s p a m m e r ' s i d e n t i t y n o t s i m p l e , b u t n o t i m p o s s i b l e e i t h e r . h i d e s u c c e s s f u l l y , s p a m m e r s h a v e m o r e t h a n j u s t a v o i d p u t t i n g t h e i r n a m e t h e i r m e s s a g e s . E v e r y t h i n g t h e y h a s a n o n y m o u s ; t h e y h a v e h i d e w h i l e

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 10

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    3/46

    s i m u l t a n e o u s l y f o o l i n g t h e i r v i c t i m s ( a n d e v e r y o n e e l s e w h o p r o v i d i n g t h e m w i t h s o m e s e r v i c e

    e s s e n t i a l t o t h e i r c r i m i n a l e n t e r p r i s e ) i n t o t h i n k i n g t h e y a r e r u n n i n g l e g i t i m a t e b u s i n e s s .

    T h e f i r s t t h i n g s p a m m e r n e e d s l o n g l i s t e m a i l a d d r e s s e s s p a m .

    S p a m m e r s g e t y o u r e m a i l a d d r e s s t w o p r i m a r y w a y s . T h e y s t e a l t h e m ( v i a h a r v e s t i n g ) t h e y

    g u e s s t h e m ( v i a d i c t i o n a r y a t t a c k s ) . T h e m o s t c o m m o n w a y s p a m m e r s s t e a l e m a i l a d d r e s s e s h a r v e s t i n g t h e m f r o m w e b s i t e s , u s i n g w e b s p i d e r s . T h i s m a k e s l i f e d i f f i c u l t f o r t h e r e s t

    b e c a u s e p o s t i n g e m a i l a d d r e s s e s w e b s i t e c o n v e n i e n t w a y f a c i l i t a t e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s b e t w e e n v i s i t o r s t o w e b s i t e a n d t h e o w n e r s o f t h e w e b s i t e . O w n e r s w e b s i t e s w h o w a n t

    d i s p l a y e m a i l a d d r e s s e s c a n o b t a i n s o m e p r o t e c t i o n f r o m h a r v e s t e r s i n s t a l l i n g P r o j e c t H o n e y

    P o t t h e i r w e b s i t e , a n d d i s p l a y i n g t h i s P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t l o g o t h e i r w e b s i t e : 1

    T h e l o g o s e r v e s w a r n i n g h a r v e s t e r s t h a t a l l t h e e m a i l a d d r e s s e s d i s p l a y e d a n y w h e r e

    t h e w e b s i t e a r e p r o t e c t e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t a n d d e t e r s h a r v e s t e r s p u t t i n g t h e m l e g a l r i s k t h e y s p a m a n y a d d r e s s e s h a r v e s t e d f r o m t h e w e b s i t e .

    D o m a i n n a m e o w n e r s w h o w a n t p r o t e c t t h e i r e m a i l s y s t e m f r o m s p a m c a n o b t a i n s o m e p r o t e c t i o n d o n a t i n g r e c o r d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , a n d t h e n p u b l i c l y

    d i s c l o s i n g t h e f a c t t h e i r d o n a t i o n ( b u t t h e y s h o u l d n o t d i s c l o s e t h e s p e c i f i c r e c o r d

    d o n a t e d , s p a m m e r s w i l l s i m p l y a v o i d t h i s r e c o r d a n d c o n t i n u e s e n d s p a m

    T h e w e b s i t e f o r t h e l o g o c a n f o u n d h t t p : / / w w w . p r o i e c t h o n e y p o t . o r s / h o w a v o i d s p a m h o t s S . p h p .

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 3 of 10

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    4/46

    r e c o r d s n o t d o n a t e d P H P ) . p u b l i c l y d i s c l o s i n g t h e i r a f f i l i a t i o n w i t h P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , P H P m e m b e r s w a r n s p a m m e r s t h a t t h e i r d o m a i n n a m e s a r e p r o t e c t e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t .

    P r o j e c t H o n e v P o t d b a U n s o a m T e c h n o l o g i e s . I n c . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t f w w w . D r o i e c t h o n e v n o t . o r ^ d i s t r i b u t e d n e t w o r k

    s p a m - t r a c k i n g h o n e y p o t s . T h e p r o j e c t a l l o w s s p a m m e r s , p h i s h e r s , a n d o t h e r e - c r i m i n a l s t r a c k e d t h r o u g h o u t t h e e n t i r e " s p a m c y c l e . " i n f o r m a t i o n a n d b e l i e f , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t w a s t h e f i r s t d i s t r i b u t e d e - m a i l h a r v e s t i n g r e s e a r c h e f f o r t l i n k i n g t h o s e t h a t g a t h e r e - m a i l a d d r e s s e s s c r a p i n g w e b s i t e s w i t h t h o s e t h a t s e n d u n s o l i c i t e d a n d f r e q u e n t l y f r a u d u l e n t m e s s a g e s . T e n s o f t h o u s a n d s u s e r s f r o m l e a s t 1 0 0 c o u n t r i e s a c t i v e l y p a r t i c i p a t e i n P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s e f f o r t t r a c k c r i m i n a l s w h o b r e a k t h e l a w v i a e m a i l . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t w a s c r e a t e d U n s p a m

    T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c ( w w w . u n s p a m . c o m ) a n t i - s p a m c o m p a n y w i t h t h e s i n g u l a r m i s s i o n h e l p i n g d e s i g n a n d e n f o r c e e f f e c t i v e a n t i - s p a m l a w s . U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . D e l a w a r e c o r p o r a t i o n w i t h i t s p r i n c i p a l p l a c e b u s i n e s s 1 9 0 1 P r o s p e c t o r A v e . , S u i t e # 2 0 0 ,

    P a r k C i t y , U t a h 8 4 0 6 0 . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t r e c e i v e s r e c o r d d o n a t i o n s f r o m t h e o w n e r s o f

    I n t e r n e t d o m a i n n a m e s . T h r o u g h t h o s e d o n a t i o n s , e m a i l m e s s a g e s a d d r e s s e d a n y u s e r n a m e h o s t e d d o n a t e d d o m a i n n a m e a r e d i r e c t e d e m a i l s e r v e r s o w n e d a n d m a i n t a i n e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , a n d t h o s e e m a i l m e s s a g e s a r e t h e n p r o c e s s e d a n d s t o r e d c o m p u t e r e q u i p m e n t o w n e d a n d m a i n t a i n e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t a l s o m a k e s a v a i l a b l e I n t e r n e t w e b s i t e o w n e r s e m a i l a d d r e s s h o n e y p o t s t h a t c a n i n s t a l l e d t h e i r w e b p a g e s . W h e n h a r v e s t e r v i s i t s t h o s e w e b p a g e s l o o k i n g f o r e m a i l a d d r e s s e s s t e a l , t h e h a r v e s t e r h a n d e d u n i q u e e m a i l a d d r e s s h o s t e d w i t h i n P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s d i s t r i b u t e d n e t w o r k d o n a t e d r e c o r d s . T h e h a r v e s t e r ' s I P a d d r e s s , t h e d a t e a n d t i m e t h e v i s i t a n d o t h e r c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s t h e

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 4 of 10

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    5/46

    h a r v e s t e r a r e r e c o r d e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t a n d m a i n t a i n e d f o r a n a l y s i s a n d t r a c k i n g . W h e n s p a m m e s s a g e r e c e i v e d t h e r e a f t e r t h e u n i q u e e m a i l a d d r e s s , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t c a n t i e t h e s p a m m e s s a g e ( a n d t h e s p a m m e r ) t h e h a r v e s t e r t h a t w a s g i v e n t h a t e m a i l a d d r e s s .

    1 0 . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t c u r r e n t l y m o n i t o r i n g o v e r 2 . 1 m i l l i o n h o n e y p o t a d d r e s s e s f o r a n n o y i n g s p a m a n d d a n g e r o u s p h i s h i n g m e s s a g e s . B e t w e e n J a n u a r y 2 0 0 5 a n d A p r i l 2 0 0 7 , J o h n D o e s p a m m e r s t r a n s m i t t e d o v e r 6 . 1 m i l l i o n s p a m m e s s a g e s t e n s t h o u s a n d s u n i q u e e m a i l a d d r e s s e s b e l o n g i n g P H P m e m b e r s t h a t h a v e d o n a t e d r e c o r d t o , a n d

    a r e r e c e i v i n g a n t i - s p a m p r o t e c t i o n f r o m , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t . A l l t h e s e e m a i l a d d r e s s e s w e r e i l l e g a l l y h a r v e s t e d t h e s p a m m e r ( o r o n e h i s c o - c o n s p i r a t o r s ) f r o m w e b s i t e h o s t i n g P H P h o n e y p o t , w e r e t h e s u b j e c t d i c t i o n a r y s p a m a t t a c k s t h a t i n d i s c r i m i n a t e l y t a r g e t e d r a n d o m u s e r n a m e s h o s t e d w i t h i n I n t e r n e t d o m a i n n a m e s t h a t h a v e d o n a t e d r e c o r d t o , a n d a r e r e c e i v i n g a n t i - s p a m p r o t e c t i o n f r o m , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t .

    1 1 . d a t e , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h a s i d e n t i f i e d 2 , 4 8 9 , 8 1 4 u n i q u e s p a m s e r v e r I P a d d r e s s e s , 1 5 , 5 7 0 u n i q u e h a r v e s t e r a d d r e s s e s , 8 7 , 6 4 3 u n i q u e d i c t i o n a r y a t t a c k s p a m s e r v e r I P a d d r e s s e s , a n d s i n c e A p r i l 2 0 0 7 , h a s i d e n t i f i e d 6 3 0 c o m m e n t s p a m s e r v e r I P a d d r e s s e s .

    1 2 . E v e r y s p a m m e s s a g e t r a n s m i t t e d P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h o n e y p o t e m a i l a d d r e s s h a r m s P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t . E a c h s p a m m e s s a g e r e c e i v e d m a i l s e r v e r c o n t r o l l e d a n d p a i d f o r P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , w h i c h t h e n m u s t p r o c e s s , s t o r e a n d a n a l y z e t h e m e s s a g e h e l p p r o t e c t t h e w e b s i t e o w n e r s w h o h a v e i n s t a l l e d h o n e y p o t s t h e i r w e b p a g e s f r o m h a r v e s t e r s , a n d p r o t e c t t h e d o m a i n n a m e o w n e r s w h o h a v e d o n a t e d r e c o r d s f r o m s p a m a t t a c k s .

    1 3 . t h i s a c t i o n , P l a i n t i f f s e e k s : ( i ) i n j u n c t i o n p r e v e n t f u r t h e r u n l a w f u l c o n d u c t ; ( i i ) c o m p e n s a t o r y d a m a g e s ; ( i i i ) p u n i t i v e d a m a g e s ; ( i v ) a t t o r n e y s ' f e e s a n d c o s t s s u i t .

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 5 of 10

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    6/46

    J o h n D o e D e f e n d a n t s

    1 4 . D e f e n d a n t s ' i d e n t i t y c u r r e n t l y u n k n o w n P l a i n t i f f b e c a u s e D e f e n d a n t s h a v e i n t e n t i o n a l l y a c t e d h i d e t h e i r i d e n t i t y e v a d e d e t e c t i o n .

    J U R I S D I C T I O N A N D V F N T 1 F 1 5 . T h i s a c t i o n a r i s e s o u t D e f e n d a n t s ' v i o l a t i o n t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M

    A c t . T h e C o u r t h a s s u b j e c t m a t t e r j u r i s d i c t i o n t h i s a c t i o n b a s e d o n 2 8 U . S . C . 1 3 3 1 . 1 6 . P u r s u a n t U . S . C . 1 3 9 1 ( b ) , v e n u e p r o p e r t h i s j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t .

    s u b s t a n t i a l p a r t t h e e v e n t s o r o m i s s i o n s g i v i n g r i s e P l a i n t i f f s c l a i m s , t o g e t h e r w i t h s u b s t a n t i a l p a r t t h e p r o p e r t y t h a t t h e s u b j e c t P l a i n t i f f c l a i m s , a r e s i t u a t e d i n t h i s j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t . F o r e x a m p l e , 1 6 6 P H P m e m b e r s s e l f - r e p o r t t h e y a r e l o c a t e d V i r g i n i a . P H P m e m b e r s h a v e i n s t a l l e d h o n e y p o t s 1 7 5 w e b s i t e s t h a t a r e l o c a t e d V i r g i n i a , a n d t h e s e V i r g i n i a - b a s e d h o n e y p o t s h a v e d i s t r i b u t e d 3 6 , 4 0 2 e m a i l a d d r e s s e s i d e n t i f i e d h a r v e s t e r s w o r l d - w i d e . a d d i t i o n P H P ' s s u b s t a n t i a l p r e s e n c e i n V i r g i n i a , t h e J o h n D o e s a l s o h a v e s u b s t a n t i a l

    c o n n e c t i o n s V i r g i n i a . F o r e x a m p l e , t h e J o h n D o e s p a m m e r s h a v e u s e d 1 1 1 h a r v e s t e r a d d r e s s e s V i r g i n i a h a r v e s t 8 4 8 P H P m e m b e r h o n e y p o t e m a i l a d d r e s s e s . T h e J o h n D o e s h a v e a l s o u s e d 2 0 , 7 7 8 s p a m s e r v e r I P s l o c a t e d V i r g i n i a t r a n s m i t 6 0 , 1 4 3 s p a m m e s s a g e s P H P m e m b e r h o n e y p o t e m a i l a d d r e s s e s . A n d 2 4 5 o c c a s i o n s , t h e J o h n D o e s h a v e r e l i e d e n t i r e l y V i r g i n i a a d d r e s s e s f u r t h e r t h e i r i l l e g a l e n t e r p r i s e h a r v e s t i n g a P H P m e m b e r e m a i l a d d r e s s f r o m a V i r g i n i a - b a s e d a d d r e s s a n d t h e n s e n d i n g s p a m t o t h a t a d d r e s s f r o m s p a m s e r v e r u s i n g V i r g i n i a - b a s e d I P a d d r e s s . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e w e b p a g e s a d v e r t i s e d t h e s p a m m e s s a g e s w e r e a l l v i s i b l e i n V i r g i n i a , a n d ( o n i n f o r m a t i o n a n d b e l i e f ) m a n y t h e p r o d u c t s a n d s e r v i c e s a d v e r t i s e d t h e s p a m m e s s a g e s w e r e s h i p p e d d e l i v e r e d p h y s i c a l a d d r e s s e s V i r g i n i a .

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 6 of 10

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    7/46

    1 7 . T h e f e d e r a l D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t V i r g i n i a h a s p e r s o n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r D e f e n d a n t s b a s e d t h e f o l l o w i n g f a c t s : D e f e n d a n t s i n i t i a t e d e m a i l s f r o m t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t V i r g i n i a , g a i n e d u n a u t h o r i z e d a c c e s s c o m p u t e r s e r v e r s l o c a t e d t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t , c a u s e d t o r t i o u s i n j u r y t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t , a n d c o n d u c t e d b u s i n e s s t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t V i r g i n i a .

    C O U N T I V i o l a t i o n t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t T T , S . C . 7 7 0 1 s o q 1 8 . P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s a n d r e - a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s p a r a g r a p h s t h r o u g h

    t h i s C o m p l a i n t .

    1 9 . D e f e n d a n t s i n i t i a t e d t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n , p r o t e c t e d c o m p u t e r , c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e t h a t c o n t a i n e d , o r w a s a c c o m p a n i e d b y , h e a d e r i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t w a s m a t e r i a l l y f a l s e m a t e r i a l l y m i s l e a d i n g , v i o l a t i o n U S C 7 7 0 4 ( a ) ( l ) .

    2 0 . p a t t e r n p r a c t i c e , D e f e n d a n t s i n i t i a t e d t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n p r o t e c t e d c o m p u t e r c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e t h a t d i d n o t c o n t a i n f u n c t i o n i n g r e t u r n e l e c t r o n i c m a i l a d d r e s s o r o t h e r I n t e r n e t - b a s e d m e c h a n i s m , c l e a r l y a n d c o n s p i c u o u s l y d i s p l a y e d , t h a t r e c i p i e n t c o u l d u s e s u b m i t , m a n n e r s p e c i f i e d t h e m e s s a g e , r e p l y e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e o t h e r f o r m o f I n t e r n e t - b a s e d c o m m u n i c a t i o n r e q u e s t i n g n o t r e c e i v e f u t u r e c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e s f r o m t h a t s e n d e r t h e e l e c t r o n i c m a i l a d d r e s s w h e r e t h e m e s s a g e w a s r e c e i v e d , i n v i o l a t i o n U S C 7 7 0 4 ( a ) ( 3 ) .

    2 1 . I n p a t t e r n p r a c t i c e , D e f e n d a n t s i n i t i a t e d t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e p r o t e c t e d c o m p u t e r a n d f a i l e d t o p r o v i d e : ( i ) c l e a r a n d c o n s p i c u o u s i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t h a t t h e m e s s a g e w a s a d v e r t i s e m e n t o r s o l i c i t a t i o n ; ( i i ) c l e a r a n d c o n s p i c u o u s n o t i c e t h a t t h e r e c i p i e n t c o u l d d e c l i n e r e c e i v e f t i r t h e r c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 7 of 10

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    8/46

    m e s s a g e s f r o m t h e s e n d e r ; a n d ( i i i ) v a l i d p h y s i c a l p o s t a l a d d r e s s t h e s e n d e r , v i o l a t i o n 1 5 U S C 7 7 0 4 ( a ) ( 5 ) .

    2 2 . P l a i n t i f f I n t e r n e t a c c e s s s e r v i c e a d v e r s e l y a f f e c t e d t h e a b o v e v i o l a t i o n s , a n d e n t i t l e d i n j u n c t i o n b a r r i n g f u r t h e r v i o l a t i o n s , s t a t u t o r y d a m a g e s o f $ 1 0 0 f o r e v e r y a t t e m p t e d t r a n s m i s s i o n s p a m m e s s a g e t h a t c o n t a i n s f a l s e m i s l e a d i n g t r a n s m i s s i o n i n f o r m a t i o n , s t a t u t o r y d a m a g e s o f $ 2 5 f o r e v e r y a t t e m p t e d t r a n s m i s s i o n s p a m m e s s a g e t h a t o t h e r w i s e f a i l s c o m p l y w i t h t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t , t r e b l e d a m a g e s r e s u l t i n g f r o m D e f e n d a n t s ' u s e e m a i l h a r v e s t e r s a n d d i c t i o n a r y a t t a c k s f a c i l i t a t e t h e i r v i o l a t i o n s t h e C A N - S P A M A c t , a n d a t t o r n e y f e e s a n d c o s t s , a u t h o r i z e d U S C 7 7 0 6 ( g ) .

    C O U N T V i o l a t i o n o f V i r g i n i a ' s A n t i - S p a m S t a t u t e ( 1 8 V a . C o d e 1 8 . 2 - 1 5 2 . 3 : 1 s e q . )

    2 3 . P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s a n d r e - a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s p a r a g r a p h s t h r o u g h t h i s C o m p l a i n t .

    2 4 . D e f e n d a n t s u s e d c o m p u t e r c o m p u t e r n e t w o r k w i t h t h e i n t e n t t o f a l s i f y f o r g e e l e c t r o n i c m a i l t r a n s m i s s i o n i n f o r m a t i o n o r o t h e r r o u t i n g i n f o r m a t i o n a n y m a n n e r

    c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n b u l k e l e c t r o n i c m a i l t h r o u g h o r i n t o t h e c o m p u t e r n e t w o r k e l e c t r o n i c m a i l s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r i t s s u b s c r i b e r s .

    2 5 . D e f e n d a n t s ' t r a n s m i s s i o n s w e r e c o n t r a v e n t i o n t h e a u t h o r i t y g r a n t e d i n v i o l a t i o n t h e p o l i c i e s s e t P l a i n t i f f . D e f e n d a n t s h a d k n o w l e d g e t h e a u t h o r i t y

    p o l i c i e s t h o s e e m a i l s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r s , t h e a u t h o r i t y p o l i c i e s w e r e a v a i l a b l e P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s w e b s i t e .

    2 6 . r e s u l t D e f e n d a n t s ' a c t i o n s , P l a i n t i f f h a s s u f f e r e d i n j u r y , a n d e n t i t l e d t o i n j u n c t i o n , a n d r e c o v e r a c t u a l d a m a g e s , i n l i e u t h e r e o f $ 1 f o r e a c h a n d e v e r y

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 8 of 10

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    9/46

    u n s o l i c i t e d b u l k e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e t r a n s m i t t e d v i o l a t i o n t h e s t a t u t e , $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 p e r d a y a n y o f f e n d i n g m e s s a g e w a s t r a n s m i t t e d , p l u s a t t o r n e y s ' f e e s a n d c o s t s s u i t .

    P R A Y E R F O R R E L I E F W H E R E F O R E , P l a i n t i f f r e q u e s t s e n t r y o f j u d g m e n t i t s f a v o r a n d a g a i n s t

    D e f e n d a n t s :

    G r a n t i n g p r e l i m i n a r y a n d p e r m a n e n t i n j u n c t i v e r e l i e f a g a i n s t D e f e n d a n t s , a n d a l l t h o s e i n p r i v i t y a c t i n g c o n c e r t w i t h D e f e n d a n t s , e n j o i n i n g t h e m f r o m d i r e c t l y i n d i r e c t l y v i o l a t i n g t h e t e r m s t h e C A N - S P A M A c t t h e t e r m s t h e V i r g i n i a a n t i - s p a m s t a t u t e ;

    A w a r d i n g P l a i n t i f f c o m p e n s a t o r y a n d p u n i t i v e d a m a g e s a m o u n t p r o v e n t r i a l ;

    A w a r d i n g P l a i n t i f f a t t o r n e y s ' f e e s a n d c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h p r o s e c u t i n g t h i s a c t i o n ; a n d

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 9 of 10

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    10/46

    G r a n t i n g P l a i n t i f f s u c h o t h e r a d d i t i o n a l r e l i e f t h i s C o u r t d e e m s j u s t a n d p r o p e r u n d e r t h e c i r c u m s t a n c e s .

    D a t e d : A p r i l 2 & , 2 0 0 7 R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,

    I N T E R N E T L A W G R O U P J o n P r a e d ( V S B # 4 0 6 7 8 ) 4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B o u l e v a r d , S u i t e 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n , V i r g i n i a 2 2 2 0 3 ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 0

    A t t o r n e y s f o r P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a o f U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c .

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 10 of 10

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    11/46

    & J S 4 4 ( R e v . C I V I L C O V E R S H E E T T h e J S - 4 4 c i v i l c o v e r s h e e t a n d t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d h e r e i n n e i t h e r r e p l a c e n o r s u p p l a n e n t t h e f i l i n e a n d s e r v i c e p i e l a w e x c e p t p r o v i d e d l o c a l r u l e s c o u r t , T h f e f o r m , a p p r o v e d b y t h e J u d i c i a l C o n f e r e n c e t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s s i p j o l > e r l " 9 7 4 r a u F r ^ 7 o 7 t n c u s e t h e C l e r k o f C o u r t f o r t h e p u r p o s e i n i t i a t i n g t h e c i v i l d o c k e t s h e e t . ( S E E I N S T R U C T I O N S T H E R E V E R S E S l 7 T I E F Q R M . ; > A o r y w ( a ) P L A I N T I F F S

    P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . ,

    ( b ) C o u u y R e s i d e n c e F i r s t L i s t e d P l a i n t i f f P a r k C i t y , U t a h ( E X C E P T U . S . P L A I N T I F F C A S E S )

    D E F E N D A N T S J o h n D o e s

    o r o t h e r p a p e r s r e q u i r e ?

    r } 2 2 0 0 7

    C o u n t y o f R e s i d e n c e F i r s t L i s l a i D e f e n d a n t U n k n o w n ( I N U . S . P L A I N T I F F C A S E S O N L Y ) N O T E : L A N D C O N D E M N A T I O N C A S E S . U S E T H E L O C A T I O N T H E

    L A N D I N V O L V E D .

    ( c ) A t t o r n e y s ( F i r m N a m e , A d d r e s s , a n d T e l e p h o n e N u m b e r ) A l t o m e y s ( I f K n o w n ) I n t o m e l L a w G r o u p J o n P r a o e ! ( V S B 4 0 6 7 8 ) 4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B l v d . , S u i t s 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n . 2 2 2 0 3 ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 2 ; ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 6 2 ( r a x )

    I I . B A S I S J U R I S D I C T I O N

    U . S . G o v e r n m e n t 3 F e d e r a l Q u e s t i o n P l a i n t i f f ( U . S . G o v e r n m e n t N o t P a r t y )

    U . S . G o v e r n m e n t D i v e r s i t y D e f e n d a n t ( I n d i c a t e C i t i z e n s h i p P a r t i e s

    I t e m I D )

    I I I . C I T I Z E N S H I P P R I N C I P A L P A R T l E S < P i a c c a n - x - i n O n c B o x f o r P i a i n t i f f ( F o r D i v c r s i C a s e s l y ) a n d O n e B o x f D c f c r . d a m )

    P T F D E F P T F D E F C i t i z e n T h i s S t a t e I n c o r p o o t e d o r P r i n c i p a l P l a c e

    B u s i n e s s T h i s S t a t e

    C i t i z e n o f A n o t h e r S t a l e I n c o r p o r a t e d a n d P r i n c i p a l P l a c e B u s i n e s s A n o t h e r S l a t e

    C i t i z e n o r S u b j e c t u f a F o r e i g n N a t i o n F o r e i g n C o u n t r y

    I V . N A T U R E S U I T ( P l a c e " X " O n e B o x O n l y ) C O N T R A C T T O R T S F O R F E I T U R E / P E N A L T Y B A N K R U P T C Y O T H E R S T A T U T E S

    1 1 0 I n s u r a n c e 1 2 0 M . i t i n : 1 3 0 M i l l e r A c t 1 4 0 N e g o t i a b l e I n s t r u m e n t 1 5 0 R c c o v z r y o f O v c r p a y m c n l

    E n f o r c e m e n t J u d g m c n 1 5 1 M e d i c a r e A c t 1 5 2 R e c o v e r y D e f a u l c d

    S t u d e n t L o a n * ( E x c l . V e t e r a n s )

    1 5 } R e c o v e r y o f O v e r p a y m e n t o f V e t e r a n * B e n e f i t s

    1 6 0 S t o c k h o l d e r s ' S u i t s 1 9 0 O t h e r C o n t r a c t 1 9 5 C o n t r a c t r o d u c i L i a b i h t y

    P E R S O N A L I N J U R Y 3 1 0 A i r p l a n e 3 1 5 A i r p l a n e P r o d u c t

    L i a b i l i t y 3 2 0 A s s a u l t , L i b e l

    S l a n d e r 3 3 0 F e d e r a l E m p l o y s '

    L i a b i l i t y 3 4 0 M a r i n e 3 4 3 M a r i n e P r o d u c t

    L i a b i l i t y 3 5 0 M o t o r V e h i c l e 3 5 5 M o t o r V e h i c l e

    P r o d u c t L i a b i l i t y 3 6 0 O t h e r P e r s o n a l I n j u r y

    P E R S O N A L I N J U R Y 3 6 2 P e r s o n a l I n j u r y

    M c d . M a l p r a c t i c e 3 6 5 P e r s o n a l I n j u r y

    P r o d u c t L i a b i l i t y 3 K A t b e e t t u P e r s o n a l

    I n j u r y P r o d u c t L i a b i l i t y

    P E R S O N A L P R O P E R T Y 3 7 0 O t h e r F r a u d 3 7 1 T r u t h L e n d i n g 3 8 0 O t h e r P c n o n a l

    P r o p e r l y D a m a g e 3 8 5 P r o p e r l y m a g s

    P r o d u c t L i a b i l i t y

    6 1 0 A g r i c u l t u r e 6 2 0 O t h e r F o o d & D r u g 6 2 5 D r u g R e l a t e d S c i z t i r e

    P r o p e r t y U S C 6 3 0 l i q u o r L a w k 6 4 0 R . R . T r u c k 6 5 0 A i r l h c R e g s . 6 6 0 O c c u p a t i o n a l

    S a f e l y / H e a l t h 6 9 0 O t h e r

    4 2 2 A p p e a l 2 8 U S C 1 5 S 4 2 3 W i t h d r a w a l

    U S C 1 5 7 P R O P E R T Y R I G H T S 8 2 0 C o p y r i g h t s 8 3 0 P a t e n t

    T r a i l c m a r l t

    L A B O R S O C I A L S E C U R I T Y

    R E A L P R O P E R T Y C I V I L R I G H T S 2 1 0 L a n d C o n d e m n a t i o n 2 2 0 F o r e c l o s u r e 2 3 0 R e n t l e a s e E j e c t m e n t 2 4 0 T o r n L a n d 2 4 5 T o r t r o d u c t L i a b i l i t y 2 9 0 A l l O l h c R e a l P r o p c r l y

    4 4 1 V o t i n g 4 4 2 E m p l o y m e n t 4 4 3 H o u s i n g /

    A c c o m m o d a t i o n s 4 4 4 W e l f a r e 4 4 0 O t h e r C i v i l R i g h t s

    P R I S O N E R P E T I T I O N S 5 1 0 o t i o m i c a t c

    S e n t e n c e H a b e i s C o r p u s : 5 3 0 G e n e r a l 5 3 5 D e a t h P e n a l l y 5 4 0 M a n d a m u s O t h e r 5 5 0 C i v i l R i g h t s 5 < J P r i s o n C o n d i t i o n

    7 1 0 F a i r L a b o r S n n d a r d s A c t

    7 2 0 L a b o r / M g m t . R e l a t i o n s

    7 3 0 L a b o r / M g m t . R e p o r t i n g D i s c l o s u r e A c t

    7 4 0 R a i l w a y L a b o r A c t

    7 9 0 O t h e r L a b o r l i l i j a t b n

    7 O | E m p l . R c l . I n c . S e c u r i t y A c t

    K 6 I ( 1 3 9 5 m K 6 2 B l a c k L u n g ( 9 2 3 ) K 6 3 D l W C / D I W ( 4 0 5 ( g ) ) 8 6 4 S 3 I D T i l e X V I 8 6 5 R S I ( 4 0 5 ( g ) (

    F E D E R A L T A X S U I T S 8 7 0 T a x e s ( U S . P l a i n t i f f

    D c f c n d a n l )

    8 7 1 I R S T h i r d P a r t y U S C 7 6 0 9

    4 0 0 S t a l e R e a p p o r t i a n m c n l 4 1 0 A n l i l n s t 4 3 0 B a n k s a n d B a n k i n g 4 5 0 C o m m c r e c / I C C R a l e s / e t c . 4 6 0 D e p o r t a t i o n 4 7 0 R a c k e t e e r I n f l u e n c e d a r d

    C o r r u p t O r | i a n i z i l i o . i s K I 0 S e l e c t s S e r v i c e X 5 0 S c c u r i l c s / C o m m o d i t b s . '

    E x c h a n g e 8 7 5 C u s t o e i c r h a l l c u g c

    U S C 3 4 1 0 8 9 1 A g r i c u l t u r a l A c l > 8 9 2 E c o n o m i c S u b H i z a i b n A c t 8 9 3 E n v i r o n m e n t a l M a i l e r s K 9 4 E n e r g y A l b c a t i o n A c t 8 9 5 F r e e d o m

    I n f o r m a t i o n A c t 9 0 0 A p p e a l o f F o e D e t e r m i n a t i o n

    U n d e r E q u a l A c c e s s J u s t i c e

    9 5 0 C o n s t i t u t i o n a l i t y S t a t e S t n l u t c . 1

    8 9 0 O t h e r S t a t u t o r y A c t i o n s

    ( P L A C E " X " O N E B O X O N L Y ) O R I G I N O r i g i n a l P r o c e e d i n g

    R e m o v e d f r o m S l a t e C o u r t

    R e m a n d e d f r o m R e i n s t a t e d A p p e l l a t e C o u r t R e o p e n e d

    c U . S . C i v i l S n t u t c u n d e r w h i c h y o u a r c ( i : g a n d w r i t e b s ' c f s t a k m c n l o f c a u s e .

    T r a n s f e r r e d f r o m a n o t h e r d i s t r i c t ( s p e c i f y ) M u l t i d i s t r i c i

    L i t i g a t i o n

    A p p e a l D i s t r i c t J u d g e f r o m M a g i s t r a t e J u d g m e n t

    V I . C A U S E O F A C T I O N n o t c i t e j u r i s d i c t i o n a l s t a t u t e s u n l e s s i v c r s i t y . ) F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t

    V I I . R E Q U E S T E D C H E C K T H I S C L A S S A C T I O N D E M a F J D T C O M P L A I N T : U N D E R F . R . C P . 2 3

    V I I I . R E L A T E D C A S E ( S ) ( S e c i n s t r u c t i o n s ) : A N Y j u d g e

    C l l l i C K Y l i b a l l y d e m a n d e d c o m p l a n l : J U R Y D E M A N D : V c s

    D O C K E T N U M B E R

    A P P L Y I N G I F P M A O . J U D G E

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1-2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    12/46

    q p f c e r n e t L a w G r o u p

    R E C E I V E D

    4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B o u i e v a r d S u i t e 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n , V i r g i n i a 2 2 2 0 3 w w w . i - l a w g r o u p . c o m t e l . 7 0 3 . 2 4 3 . 8 1 0 0 f a x . 7 0 3 . 2 4 3 . 8 1 6 2 C L E R K 0 1 S T K I C 1 C O U R T A L E X A N D R I A . V I R G I N I A

    A p r i l 2 6 , 2 0 0 7

    V i a H a n d D e l i v e r y

    C l e r k t h e C o u r t C i v i l D i v i s i o n , E D V A 4 0 1 C o u r t h o u s e S q u a r e A l e x a n d r i a , 2 2 3 1 4 - 5 7 0 4

    R e : P r o j e c t H o n e v P o t J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s . T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m . A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ( 1 : 0 7 C V 4 1 9 )

    D e a r C l e r k :

    P l e a s e f i n d e n c l o s e d c h e c k o f $ 3 5 0 f o r t h e f i l i n g f e e f o r t h e C o m p l a i n t t h e a b o v e c a s e . T h e C o m p l a i n t w a s f i l e d m i s t a k e n l y w i t h o u t t h e f i l i n g f e e t h i s m o r n i n g .

    y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s o r c o n c e r n s , p l e a s e c o n t a c t 7 0 3 - 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 2 .

    T h a n k y o u f o r y o u r a s s i s t a n c e .

    V e r y t r u l y y o u r s ,

    ' J o n P r a e d I n t e r n e t L a w G r o u p

    E n c l o s u r e s

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 1-3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    13/46

    U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N

    P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m 2 0 0 1 A P R A 0 T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . , C L E R K D i S T I U C I C O U R T

    P l a i n t i f f A L E X A N D R I A . V I R G I N I A

    C I V I L A C T I O N N U M B E R J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s O " 7 4 - W

    H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,

    D e f e n d a n t .

    M o t i o n f o r L i m i t e d A u t h o r i t y t o C o n d u c t D i s c o v e r y N e c e s s a r y t o I d e n t i f y a n d S e r v e D e f e n d a n t a n d N o t i c e H e a r i n g

    P u r s u a n t F e d e r a l R u l e o f C i v i l P r o c e d u r e 2 6 ( d ) , P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . , h e r e b y m o v e s t h e C o u r t f o r l i m i t e d a u t h o r i t y c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h a s s u b m i t t e d s h o r t M e m o r a n d u m s u p p o r t i t s M o t i o n . P L E A S E T A K E N O T I C E t h a t M a y 4 , 2 0 0 7 1 0 : 0 0 a . m . , s o o n t h e r e a f t e r t h e m a t t e r m a y h e a r d , P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , i t s C o u n s e l , w i l l p r e s e n t o r a l a r g u m e n t s u p p o r t i t s m o t i o n f o r l i m i t e d a u t h o r i t y c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t .

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    14/46

    D a t e d : A p r i l ^ _ , 2 0 0 7 R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,

    I N T E R N E T L A W G R O U P J o n P r a e d ( V S B # 4 0 6 7 8 ) 4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B o u l e v a r d , S u i t e 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n , V i r g i n i a 2 2 2 0 3 ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 0

    A t t o r n e y f o r P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    15/46

    U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A

    A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N

    P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a o f U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . ,

    P l a i n t i f f ,

    C I V I L A C T I O N N U M B E R J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s

    H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,

    D e f e n d a n t .

    [ P R O P O S E D l O R D E R T h i s m a t t e r h a v i n g b e e n f u l l y b r i e f e d , a n d t h e C o u r t b e i n g f u l l y a p p r i s e d

    t h e f a c t s a n d l a w t h i s m a t t e r , H E R E B Y O R D E R E D u n d e r R u l e 2 6 ( d ) t h a t P l a i n t i f f s M o t i o n f o r L i m i t e d A u t h o r i t y C o n d u c t D i s c o v e r y N e c e s s a r y t o I d e n t i f y a n d S e r v e D e f e n d a n t s H E R E B Y G R A N T E D . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t s h a l l h a v e u n t i l

    c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t J o h n D o e s .

    U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t V i r g i n i a

    A p r i l , 2 0 0 7

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 2-2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    16/46

    U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F I L E D F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A

    A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N

    2 0 0 1 A P R 1 0 : P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m C Q U R T T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . A L E X A N D R I A . V I R G I N I A

    P l a i n t i f f ,

    N o . \ \ O i o s f J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s

    H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,

    D e f e n d a n t s .

    M e m o r a n d u m S u p p o r t P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s M o t i o n f o r L i m i t e d A u t h o r i t y C o n d u c t D i s c o v e r y N e c e s s a r y I d e n t i f y a n d S e r v e D e f e n d a n t

    t h i s m o t i o n , P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c .

    r e s p e c t f u l l y r e q u e s t s o r d e r a u t h o r i z i n g c o n d u c t l i m i t e d d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y

    a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t J o h n D o e s .

    F a c t u a l B a c k g r o u n d

    B e t w e e n J a n u a r y 2 0 0 5 a n d A p r i l 2 0 0 7 , J o h n D o e s p a m m e r s t r a n s m i t t e d o v e r 6 . 1

    m i l l i o n s p a m m e s s a g e s t e n s t h o u s a n d s u n i q u e e m a i l a d d r e s s e s b e l o n g i n g P H P m e m b e r s t h a t h a v e d o n a t e d r e c o r d t o , a n d a r e r e c e i v i n g a n t i - s p a m p r o t e c t i o n f r o m ,

    P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t . A l l t h e s e e m a i l a d d r e s s e s w e r e i l l e g a l l y h a r v e s t e d t h e s p a m m e r ( o r o n e

    h i s c o - c o n s p i r a t o r s ) f r o m w e b s i t e h o s t i n g P H P h o n e y p o t , w e r e t h e s u b j e c t d i c t i o n a r y

    s p a m a t t a c k s t h a t i n d i s c r i m i n a t e l y t a r g e t e d r a n d o m u s e r n a m e s h o s t e d w i t h i n I n t e r n e t d o m a i n

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 4

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    17/46

    n a m e s t h a t h a v e d o n a t e d r e c o r d t o , a n d a r e r e c e i v i n g a n t i - s p a m p r o t e c t i o n f r o m , P r o j e c t

    H o n e y P o t . T h e s p a m c o n t a i n e d f a l s e m i s l e a d i n g t r a n s m i s s i o n i n f o r m a t i o n , d i d n o t c o n t a i n

    f u n c t i o n i n g r e t u r n e l e c t r o n i c m a i l a d d r e s s o r o t h e r I n t e r n e t - b a s e d m e c h a n i s m , c l e a r l y a n d

    c o n s p i c u o u s l y d i s p l a y e d , t h a t r e c i p i e n t c o u l d u s e s u b m i t , m a n n e r s p e c i f i e d t h e

    m e s s a g e , r e p l y e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e o t h e r f o r m o f I n t e r n e t - b a s e d c o m m u n i c a t i o n

    r e q u e s t i n g n o t r e c e i v e f u t u r e c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l m e s s a g e s f r o m t h a t s e n d e r t h e

    e l e c t r o n i c m a i l a d d r e s s w h e r e t h e m e s s a g e w a s r e c e i v e d , a n d f a i l e d p r o v i d e : ( i ) c l e a r a n d

    c o n s p i c u o u s i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t h a t t h e m e s s a g e w a s a d v e r t i s e m e n t o r s o l i c i t a t i o n ; ( i i ) c l e a r a n d

    c o n s p i c u o u s n o t i c e t h a t t h e r e c i p i e n t c o u l d d e c l i n e r e c e i v e f u r t h e r c o m m e r c i a l e l e c t r o n i c m a i l

    m e s s a g e s f r o m t h e s e n d e r ; a n d ( i i i ) v a l i d p h y s i c a l p o s t a l a d d r e s s t h e s e n d e r a n d t h e r e b y

    v i o l a t e d t h e F e d e r a l C A N - S P A M A c t . F u r t h e r m o r e D e f e n d a n t s u s e d a c o m p u t e r c o m p u t e r n e t w o r k w i t h t h e i n t e n t f a l s i f y f o r g e e l e c t r o n i c m a i l t r a n s m i s s i o n i n f o r m a t i o n o r o t h e r

    r o u t i n g i n f o r m a t i o n a n y m a n n e r c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n b u l k e l e c t r o n i c m a i l

    t h r o u g h i n t o t h e c o m p u t e r n e t w o r k e l e c t r o n i c m a i l s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r i t s s u b s c r i b e r s a n d

    t r a n s m i t t e d t h e s p a m c o n t r a v e n t i o n t h e a u t h o r i t y g r a n t e d v i o l a t i o n t h e p o l i c i e s

    s e t P l a i n t i f f . D e f e n d a n t s h a d k n o w l e d g e t h e a u t h o r i t y o r p o l i c i e s t h o s e e m a i l s e r v i c e

    p r o v i d e r s , o r t h e a u t h o r i t y p o l i c i e s w e r e a v a i l a b l e P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s w e b s i t e t h e r e b y

    v i o l a t i n g t h e V i r g i n i a ' s A n t i - S p a m S t a t u t e .

    P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h a s c o l l e c t e d l a r g e v o l u m e o f p u b l i c l y a v a i l a b l e i n f o r m a t i o n

    t h a t r e l e v a n t t h e i d e n t i t y t h e J o h n D o e s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h i s c o n d u c t . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t ' s

    i n v e s t i g a t i o n d a t e h a s i d e n t i f i e d n u m b e r t h i r d p a r t i e s t h a t a r e l i k e l y h a v e n o n - p u b l i c

    i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t c o u l d u s e d i d e n t i f y t h e r e s p o n s i b l e p e r s o n . M a n y t h e s e t h i r d p a r t i e s h a v e a g r e e d r e t a i n t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n a n d p r o d u c e i t , b u t o n l y u p o n r e c e i p t a s u b p o e n a .

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 4

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    18/46

    P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h a s g o o d r e a s o n b e l i e v e t h a t w i l l a b l e i d e n t i f y , n a m e a n d s e r v e J o h n

    D o e D e f e n d a n t s g r a n t e d t h e p o w e r c o n d u c t f o r m a l d i s c o v e r y f o r 1 2 0 d a y s .

    L e g a l A r g u m e n t

    U n d e r R u l e 2 6 ( d ) , d i s c o v e r y m a y n o t n o r m a l l y b e g i n " b e f o r e t h e p a r t i e s h a v e

    c o n f e r r e d r e q u i r e d R u l e 2 6 ( f ) . " B e c a u s e D e f e n d a n t t h i s c a s e u n k n o w n P l a i n t i f f , t h e

    c o n f e r e n c e c o n t e m p l a t e d R u l e 2 6 ( f ) c a n n o t o c c u r . T h i s l i m i t a t i o n t h e i n i t i a t i o n

    d i s c o v e r y , h o w e v e r , c a n w a i v e d u n d e r R u l e 2 6 ( d ) C o u r t o r d e r .

    C o u r t s r e c o g n i z e t h a t , i n c e r t a i n s i t u a t i o n s , t h e i d e n t i t y D e f e n d a n t m a y n o t k n o w n p r i o r t h e f i l i n g c o m p l a i n t . s u c h c i r c u m s t a n c e s , c o u r t s a u t h o r i z e p l a i n t i f f

    u n d e r t a k e d i s c o v e r y i d e n t i f y t h e u n k n o w n d e f e n d a n t . I n G o r d o n L e e k e . 5 7 4 F . 2 d 1 1 4 7 ,

    1 1 5 2 ( 4 t h C i r . 1 9 7 8 ) , t h e F o u r t h C i r c u i t e x p l a i n e d t h a t , p l a i n t i f f s t a t e s m e r i t o r i o u s c l a i m

    a g a i n s t u n k n o w n d e f e n d a n t , t h e C o u r t s h o u l d a l l o w p l a i n t i f f t o a s c e r t a i n t h e i d e n t i t y t h e

    u n k n o w n d e f e n d a n t t h r o u g h d i s c o v e r y .

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 3 of 4

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    19/46

    W H E R E F O R E , f o r t h e f o r e g o i n g r e a s o n s a n d a n y a d d i t i o n a l r e a s o n s t h a t m a y p r o v i d e d t h e h e a r i n g t h i s m o t i o n , P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t r e s p e c t f u l l y r e q u e s t s p e r m i s s i o n u n d e r

    R u l e 2 6 ( d ) c o n d u c t s u c h d i s c o v e r y m a y n e c e s s a r y t o i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t J o h n

    D o e s . a p p r o p r i a t e o r d e r a t t a c h e d f o r t h e C o u r t ' s s i g n a t u r e .

    D a t e d : A p r i l 2 b , 2 0 0 7 R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,

    I N T E R N E T L A W G R O U P J o n P r a e d ( V S B # 4 0 6 7 8 ) 4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B o u l e v a r d , S u i t e 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n , V i r g i n i a 2 2 2 0 3 ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 0

    A t t o r n e y f o r P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 4 of 4

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    20/46

    U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N

    P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m 2 0 0 1 A P R A 0 T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . , C L E R K D i S T I U C I C O U R T

    P l a i n t i f f A L E X A N D R I A . V I R G I N I A

    C I V I L A C T I O N N U M B E R J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s O " 7 4 - W

    H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,

    D e f e n d a n t .

    M o t i o n f o r L i m i t e d A u t h o r i t y t o C o n d u c t D i s c o v e r y N e c e s s a r y t o I d e n t i f y a n d S e r v e D e f e n d a n t a n d N o t i c e H e a r i n g

    P u r s u a n t F e d e r a l R u l e o f C i v i l P r o c e d u r e 2 6 ( d ) , P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . , h e r e b y m o v e s t h e C o u r t f o r l i m i t e d a u t h o r i t y c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t h a s s u b m i t t e d s h o r t M e m o r a n d u m s u p p o r t i t s M o t i o n . P L E A S E T A K E N O T I C E t h a t M a y 4 , 2 0 0 7 1 0 : 0 0 a . m . , s o o n t h e r e a f t e r t h e m a t t e r m a y h e a r d , P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , i t s C o u n s e l , w i l l p r e s e n t o r a l a r g u m e n t s u p p o r t i t s m o t i o n f o r l i m i t e d a u t h o r i t y c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t .

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 4 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    21/46

    D a t e d : A p r i l ^ _ , 2 0 0 7 R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,

    I N T E R N E T L A W G R O U P J o n P r a e d ( V S B # 4 0 6 7 8 ) 4 1 2 1 W i l s o n B o u l e v a r d , S u i t e 1 0 1 A r l i n g t o n , V i r g i n i a 2 2 2 0 3 ( 7 0 3 ) 2 4 3 - 8 1 0 0

    A t t o r n e y f o r P l a i n t i f f P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 4 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    22/46

    U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S T R I C T V I R G I N I A

    A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N

    P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t , d b a o f U n s p a m T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c . ,

    P l a i n t i f f ,

    C I V I L A C T I O N N U M B E R J o h n D o e s I n j u r i n g P H P a n d i t s M e m b e r s

    H a r v e s t i n g E m a i l A d d r e s s e s , T r a n s m i t t i n g S p a m , A n d P o s t i n g C o m m e n t S p a m ,

    D e f e n d a n t .

    [ P R O P O S E D l O R D E R T h i s m a t t e r h a v i n g b e e n f u l l y b r i e f e d , a n d t h e C o u r t b e i n g f u l l y a p p r i s e d

    t h e f a c t s a n d l a w t h i s m a t t e r , H E R E B Y O R D E R E D u n d e r R u l e 2 6 ( d ) t h a t P l a i n t i f f s M o t i o n f o r L i m i t e d A u t h o r i t y C o n d u c t D i s c o v e r y N e c e s s a r y t o I d e n t i f y a n d S e r v e D e f e n d a n t s H E R E B Y G R A N T E D . P r o j e c t H o n e y P o t s h a l l h a v e u n t i l

    c o n d u c t d i s c o v e r y n e c e s s a r y i d e n t i f y a n d s e r v e D e f e n d a n t J o h n D o e s .

    U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t V i r g i n i a

    A p r i l , 2 0 0 7

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 5 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1

    August 24, 2007

    May

    2

    /s/

    Liam OGrady

    United States Magistrate Judge

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    23/46

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

    __________________________________________

    )

    Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., )

    )

    Plaintiff, )

    )

    v. ) No. 1:07CV419

    )

    )

    John Does Injuring PHP and its Members )By Harvesting Email Addresses, )

    Transmitting Spam, )

    And Posting Comment Spam, ))

    Defendants. )

    __________________________________________)

    NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY NECESSARY TO

    IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS, AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND

    SERVE DEFENDANTS

    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on September 7, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter

    as the matter may be heard, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP), by its Counsel, will present oral

    argument in support of its Motion to Extend Time to Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify

    and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m) Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants.

    Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 26(d), PHP hereby moves the

    Court to extend the time to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve, and to extend the

    deadline to name and serve the John Doe Defendants. PHP has submitted a short Memorandum

    in support of its Motion.

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 6 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    24/46

    Dated: August 30, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

    /s/

    Jon L. Praed

    VSB #40678Attorney for Plaintiff Project Honey Pot

    Internet Law Group

    4121 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 101

    Arlington, Virginia 22203

    Phone: (703) 243-8100

    Fax: (703) 243-8162

    [email protected]

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 6 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    25/46

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

    __________________________________________

    )

    Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., )

    )

    Plaintiff, )

    )

    v. ) No. 1:07CV419

    )

    )

    John Does Injuring PHP and its Members )By Harvesting Email Addresses, )

    Transmitting Spam, )

    And Posting Comment Spam, ))

    Defendants. )

    __________________________________________)

    NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY NECESSARY TO

    IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS, AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND

    SERVE DEFENDANTS

    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on September 7, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter

    as the matter may be heard, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP), by its Counsel, will present oral

    argument in support of its Motion to Extend Time to Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify

    and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m) Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants.

    Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 26(d), PHP hereby moves the

    Court to extend the time to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve, and to extend the

    deadline to name and serve the John Doe Defendants. PHP has submitted a short Memorandum

    in support of its Motion.

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 7 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    26/46

    Dated: August 30, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

    /s/

    Jon L. Praed

    VSB #40678Attorney for Plaintiff Project Honey Pot

    Internet Law Group

    4121 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 101

    Arlington, Virginia 22203

    Phone: (703) 243-8100

    Fax: (703) 243-8162

    [email protected]

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 7 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    27/46

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

    __________________________________________)

    Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., ))

    Plaintiff, )

    )

    v. ) No. 1:07CV419)

    John Does Injuring PHP and its Members )

    By Harvesting Email Addresses, )Transmitting Spam, )

    And Posting Comment Spam, )

    )Defendants. )

    __________________________________________)

    MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCT

    DISCOVERY NECESSARY TO IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS,

    AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND SERVE DEFENDANTS

    By this motion, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP) respectfully requests an order

    extending time to conduct limited discovery necessary to identify and serve the John Doe

    defendants, and to extend the deadline under Rule 4(m) to name and serve the John Doe

    defendants.

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    As noted in the Complaint, spam is a global problem of epidemic proportions.

    When this lawsuit was filed in late April 2007, PHP had received over 6 million spam messages

    during its 28 months of operations (an average of 217 thousand messages per month). In the four

    months since the lawsuit was filed, PHP as received an average of nearly 1 million new spam

    messages each month. While much of that growth is due to a substantial increase in the number

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 7

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    28/46

    2

    of email addresses managed by PHP (and therefore available to receive spam), the fact remains

    that spammers are continuing to operate at an alarming pace and show no signs of abating in the

    near future. They will most certainly not stop unless lawsuits of this sort are afforded the time

    needed to complete the hard work necessary to obtain the real identity of those responsible.

    The spam messages PHP has received all have one thing in common they

    advertise a host of purported products and services being sold at thousands of different websites

    located on computers all over the world. Of the 10 million messages PHP has received to date,

    however, perhaps the most pernicious have been those advertising illegal online pharmacies.

    The John Does responsible for these pharmacy spam messages are little more than high-tech

    drug traffickers. They sell counterfeit or fake prescription drugs to unwitting consumers without

    the benefit of a reputable doctors prescription. They sell their drugs at prices typically well

    below those charged by brick and mortar drugstores that are managed by licensed pharmacists

    (who are closely regulated by state and federal authorities and who dispense authentic drugs

    tested and approved by the FDA).

    The harm caused by these drug-trafficking spammers is real. A number of public

    reports in recent days have focused on the growing problem of pharmacy spam, the injuries

    traced to it, and the difficulties encountered by those who try to identify the killers behind the

    business.1

    Because of the dangerous nature of spam advertising illegal online pharmacies,

    PHP has focused its discovery to date on the John Does responsible for this type of spam. To

    1Pharmacists Warn of Buying Drugs Online After Death Reported, CBCNews.com, March 21, 2007 (available at ); Spam Hunter,

    Forbes.com, July 23, 2007 (available at < http://www.forbes.com/business/free_forbes/2007/0723/054.html>)

    (profiling the unsuccessful attempts by the head of technology at a major spam-filtering company to track pharmacy

    spam to its source); andDamn Spam: The Losing War on Junk Email, The New Yorker, August 6, 2007 (available

    at < http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/08/06/070806fa_fact_specter>) (noting negative trends in the long

    fight against spam).

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 7

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    29/46

    3

    date, we have issued nearly three dozen subpoenas to third parties that provided services of one

    form or another to the John Does. Our discovery has revealed many significant facts. We have

    identified over 10,000 different domain names appearing in spam that lead to online pharmacies

    operating under questionable circumstances. We have mapped those 10,000+ domain names to

    fewer than 200 specific Internet fingerprints.2 Most importantly, nearly 90% of the domain

    names can be mapped to less than two dozen fingerprints, and approximately half of these

    fingerprints are connected to only one hand3 that represents over 50% of the entire online

    pharmacy spam problem today.

    While the John Does behind nearly every one of these fingerprints are going to

    extreme lengths to hide their identity, nearly all of them remain vulnerable to identification

    through the use of civil discovery. All of the major fingerprints are using Visa credit card

    merchant accounts to process consumer purchases on their websites. In addition, nearly all of

    the fingerprints have other substantial connections to the United States, including the use of IP

    addresses, domain name registrars, telephone numbers, and email addresses that are serviced by

    United States-based entities.

    While we have learned much about the individuals responsible for the advertising

    of illegal online pharmacies, our discovery has also encountered a number of roadblocks. Some

    were predictable, such as the use of stolen credit cards and Web Money4 to buy some services

    that are essential to the operation of their illegal online pharmacies. Other roadblocks were not

    anticipated. For example, several merchants that sold essential services to the John Does have

    2 A fingerprint consists of any set of data that is likely to uniquely define an online pharmacy operation, and that

    serves to distinguish it from other online pharmacy operations. The data we consider includes the domain name

    hosting the site, the look and feel of the site, the technical data underlying the site, and any data points about the site

    that we may acquire through subpoena or other investigative means.3 A hand is a collection of fingerprints that are unique from each other, but have connections between them.4 Web Money is a form of online currency that is operated by a company headquartered in Moscow

    (http://www.wmtransfer.com/).

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 3 of 7

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    30/46

    4

    refused to produce the John Does payment information without a protective order in place. We

    hope to complete negotiations over such an order in the near future. Other third parties have

    failed to respond to our subpoenas, including a major credit card issuer that has failed to produce

    valuable merchant account information closely tied to the John Does. While we believe the bank

    will respond in time, a motion to compel may unfortunately prove necessary.

    For all these reasons, PHP respectfully requests it be granted through November

    26, 2007 to complete John Doe discovery and to name and serve defendants.

    LEGAL ARGUMENT

    Courts recognize that, in certain situations, the identity of a defendant may not be

    known prior to the filing of a complaint. In such circumstances, courts authorize a plaintiff to

    undertake discovery to identify the unknown defendant. In Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147,

    1152 (4th Cir. 1978), the Fourth Circuit explained that, if a plaintiff states a meritorious claim

    against an unknown defendant, the Court should allow the plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to

    ascertain the identity of the unknown defendant through discovery. Paulinus Chidi Njoku v.

    Unknown Special Unit Staff, No. 99-7644, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15695, at *2-3 (4th Cir. July

    7, 2000) (remanding the case with instructions to afford plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to

    properly identify the John Does). This power is codified in Rule 26(d), which permits the Court

    to authorize discovery prior to the planning conference contemplated under Rule 26(f).

    In addition to authorizing discovery necessary to identify and serve the John Doe

    defendants, PHP is also seeking an extension of its deadline to name and serve defendants under

    Rule 4(m). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that a plaintiff who shows good cause

    for failure to effectuate service within 120 days of filing the complaint is entitled to an

    appropriate extension of time to serve. Courts have held that good cause exists and that a

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 4 of 7

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    31/46

    5

    plaintiff is entitled to additional time to effect service when defendants take affirmative actions

    to avoid service of process. For example, in Ruiz-Varela v. Velez, the District Court dismissed

    the plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve Defendant Figueroa. 814 F.2d

    821 (1st Cir. 1987). Recognizing that Figueroa was attempting to evade personal service by

    concealing his whereabouts, the First Circuit vacated the dismissal. Because Figueroa's attempts

    to conceal his location were designed to frustrate the plaintiff's ability to effectuate service, the

    Court of Appeals explained that dismissal for failure to serve was inappropriate: Evasion of

    service by a putative defendant constitutes good cause for failure to serve under Rule 4[m]. Id.

    at 824. As noted above, the defendants in this case have gone to extreme measures to evade

    identification and service. Their attempts at evasion are an adequate basis for extending PHPs

    deadline to name and serve.

    This Court should also grant PHP an extension of time to identify and serve the

    John Does due to its diligence in prosecuting this matter. Courts have consistently held that a

    showing of diligence and a reasonable effort to effect service constitute good cause under

    Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). In re Hall, 222 B.R. 275, 279 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1998)

    (citing T & S Rentals v. United States, 164 F.R.D. 422, 426 (N.D. W.Va. 1996) and United

    States v. Britt, 170 F.R.D. 8, 10 (D. Md. 1996). In determining the type of diligence or extent of

    effort required to warrant an extension of the 120-day deadline, courts have examined the

    legislative history of amendments to Rule 4, noting that: Inadvertent or heedless non-service is

    what amended Rule 4[m] is aimed at. Congress intended that a plaintiff who had made

    reasonable efforts to effect service would be permitted additional time, if needed, under Rule

    6(b). Arroyo v. Wheat, 102 F.R.D. 516, 518 (D. Nev. 1984) (citing to cases in which there

    was no dilatory or willful delay and in which plaintiffs abortive efforts [were] bona fide, as

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 5 of 7

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    32/46

    6

    illustrative of situations in which good cause was determined to exist); see also Quann v.

    Whitegate-Edgewater, 112 F.R.D. 649, 659 (D. Md. 1986) (citing Arroyo v. Wheat).

    PHP has subpoenaed nearly three dozen third parties in possession of information

    likely to lead to the identity of the John Doe defendants. This information has provided valuable

    leads into the identity of the defendants. PHP plans to continue its John Doe discovery, and also

    plans to communicate with other victims of these John Does in an effort to ensure its discovery

    does not inadvertently compromise other pending civil and criminal investigations. All of these

    reasons constitute good cause for an extension of the deadline to name and serve the John Doe

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons and any additional

    reasons that may be adduced on this matter, PHP respectfully asks the Court to grant this

    Request and enter an Order substantially in the form of the attached proposed Order.

    Dated: August 30, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

    /s/

    Jon L. Praed

    VSB #40678

    Attorney for Plaintiff Project Honey Pot

    Internet Law Group4121 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 101

    Arlington, Virginia 22203

    Phone: (703) 243-8100Fax: (703) 243-8162

    [email protected]

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 6 of 7

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    33/46

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

    __________________________________________

    )Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )

    Technologies, Inc., )

    )

    Plaintiff, )

    )

    v. ) No. 1:07CV419

    )

    )

    John Does Injuring PHP and its Members )By Harvesting Email Addresses, )

    Transmitting Spam, )And Posting Comment Spam, )

    )

    Defendants. )

    __________________________________________)

    [PROPOSED]ORDER GRANTING PROJECT HONEY POTS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

    TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY AND TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO NAME AND SERVE DEFENDANTS

    This matter having been fully briefed, and the Court being fully apprised of the facts and

    law in this matter, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Project Honey Pots Motion to Extend Time to

    Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m)

    Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants is HEREBY GRANTED. Project Honey Pot shall have

    until November 26, 2007 to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve Defendants John

    Does.

    Date: __________________, 2007 ____________________________________

    United States District Court

    Eastern District of Virginia

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 8 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 7 of 7

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    34/46

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    Alexandria Division

    PROJECT HONEY POT )d/b/a UNSPAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ))

    Plaintiff, ))

    v. ) CIVIL NO. 1:07cv419)

    JOHN DOES, ))

    Defendants. ))

    O R D E R

    For the reasons stated from the bench, and in accord with specific rulings made at that time,

    it is

    ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to extend time (no. 6) is GRANTED, and discovery

    needed to identify the defendants may be conducted through November 26, 2007.

    ENTERED this 7 day of September, 2007th

    .

    /s/Thomas Rawles Jones, Jr.United States Magistrate Judge

    Alexandria, Virginia

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 9 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 1 of 1

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    35/46

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

    __________________________________________

    )

    Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., )

    Plaintiff, )

    v. ) No. 1:07CV419

    )

    John Does, )

    Defendants. )

    __________________________________________)

    NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY NECESSARY TO

    IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS, AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND

    SERVE DEFENDANTS

    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 7, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter

    as the matter may be heard, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP), by its counsel, will present oral

    argument in support of its Motion to Extend Time to Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify

    and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m) Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants.

    Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 26(d), PHP hereby moves the Court to

    extend the time to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve, and to extend the deadline

    to name and serve the John Doe Defendants. PHP has submitted a short Memorandum in

    support of its Motion.

    Dated: November 26, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

    /s/

    Jon L. Praed

    VSB #40678

    Attorney for Plaintiff Project Honey Pot

    Internet Law Group

    4121 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 101

    Arlington, Virginia 22203

    Phone: (703) 243-8100

    Fax: (703) 243-8162

    [email protected]

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 10 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    36/46

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

    __________________________________________

    )Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )

    Technologies, Inc., )

    Plaintiff, )

    )

    v. ) No. 1:07CV419

    )

    John Does, )

    Defendants. )

    __________________________________________)

    [PROPOSED]ORDER GRANTING PROJECT HONEY POTS MOTION TO EXTEND TIMETO CONDUCT DISCOVERY AND TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO NAME AND SERVE DEFENDANTS

    This matter having been fully briefed, and the Court being fully apprised of the facts and

    law in this matter, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Project Honey Pots Motion to Extend Time to

    Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m)

    Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants is HEREBY GRANTED. Project Honey Pot shall have

    until January 28, 2008 to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve Defendants John

    Does.

    Date: __________________, 2007 ____________________________________

    United States District Court

    Eastern District of Virginia

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 10 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    37/46

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

    __________________________________________

    )

    Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., )

    Plaintiff, )

    v. ) No. 1:07CV419

    )

    John Does, )

    Defendants. )

    __________________________________________)

    NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY NECESSARY TO

    IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS, AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND

    SERVE DEFENDANTS

    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 7, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter

    as the matter may be heard, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP), by its counsel, will present oral

    argument in support of its Motion to Extend Time to Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify

    and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m) Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants.

    Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 26(d), PHP hereby moves the Court to

    extend the time to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve, and to extend the deadline

    to name and serve the John Doe Defendants. PHP has submitted a short Memorandum in

    support of its Motion.

    Dated: November 26, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

    /s/

    Jon L. Praed

    VSB #40678

    Attorney for Plaintiff Project Honey Pot

    Internet Law Group

    4121 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 101

    Arlington, Virginia 22203

    Phone: (703) 243-8100

    Fax: (703) 243-8162

    [email protected]

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 11 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 1 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    38/46

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

    __________________________________________

    )Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )

    Technologies, Inc., )

    Plaintiff, )

    )

    v. ) No. 1:07CV419

    )

    John Does, )

    Defendants. )

    __________________________________________)

    [PROPOSED]ORDER GRANTING PROJECT HONEY POTS MOTION TO EXTEND TIMETO CONDUCT DISCOVERY AND TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO NAME AND SERVE DEFENDANTS

    This matter having been fully briefed, and the Court being fully apprised of the facts and

    law in this matter, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Project Honey Pots Motion to Extend Time to

    Conduct Discovery Necessary to Identify and Serve Defendants, and to Extend Rule 4(m)

    Deadline to Name and Serve Defendants is HEREBY GRANTED. Project Honey Pot shall have

    until January 28, 2008 to conduct discovery necessary to identify and serve Defendants John

    Does.

    Date: __________________, 2007 ____________________________________

    United States District Court

    Eastern District of Virginia

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 11 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 2 of 2

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    39/46

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

    ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

    __________________________________________)

    Project Honey Pot, a dba of Unspam )Technologies, Inc., )Plaintiff, )

    )

    v. ) No. 1:07CV419

    )

    John Does, )

    Defendants. )

    __________________________________________)

    MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO CONDUCTDISCOVERY NECESSARY TO IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANTS,

    AND TO EXTEND RULE 4(M)DEADLINE TO NAME AND SERVE DEFENDANTS

    By this motion, Plaintiff Project Honey Pot (PHP) respectfully requests an order

    extending time to conduct limited discovery necessary to identify and serve the John Doe

    defendants, and to extend the deadline under Rule 4(m) to name and serve the John Doe

    defendants.

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    As noted in the Complaint, spam is a global problem of epidemic proportions, and

    the volumes continue to rise at an alarming rate. When this lawsuit was filed in late April 2007,

    PHP had received only 6 million spam messages over the first 28 months of operations (an

    average of 217 thousand spam messages per month). In the four months immediately following

    the filing of this lawsuit, PHP received an average of nearly 1 million new spam messages each

    month. PHP is now receiving well over 1 million spam messages every four days. Much of that

    spam advertises illegal online pharmacies that are the focus of this lawsuit. Our analysis of this

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 12 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 1 of 5

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    40/46

    2

    spam continues to indicate the vast majority of the problem can be traced to fewer than two

    dozen professional cyber-gangs.1 Our discovery is also generally consistent with the limited

    facts that have been publicly disclosed by others who are researching this illegal conduct.2

    Despite their best efforts to hide, PHP believes every one of the professional

    gangs remains vulnerable to discovery and exposure through civil legal process. A number of

    domestic corporations are unwittingly providing essential services to the criminal gangs. To

    name just a few enabling services, every one of the gangs being tracked in this lawsuit has access

    to the following essential services:

    credit card merchant accounts they are using to charge consumer credit cards,

    toll free telephone numbers they advertise as customer service centers, and Internet-based accounts (domain names, webhosting services, email accounts, etc.) that

    produce innumerable data points that are controlled by domestic-based corporate entities.

    In recent weeks, PHP has successfully pursued several of these domestic

    discovery fronts against a number of the largest cyber-gangs. For example, PHP only recently

    obtained payment information from an email service provider that was providing email service to

    one of the John Does. This John Doe was using the provider to distribute confirmation emails to

    buyers. The payment information provided indicates the John Doe paid for this email account

    using two debit cards issued by domestic financial institutions. PHP has initiated informal

    1 In its previous motion to extend discovery, PHP briefly outlined the technical details that defined its view of the

    scope of the pharmacy spam problem and its counsels success in connecting nearly 90% of the problem to less than

    two dozen criminal cyber-gang fingerprints. See Memorandum in Support of Motion to Extend John DoeDiscovery, filed August 30, 2007.2Internet Fraud Epidemic Costing Billions of Dollars, The Mercury News, November 9, 2007(available athttp://www.siliconvalley.com/ghostsinthebrowser/ci_7408419?nclick_check=1);

    The Hunt for Russias Web Criminals, The Guardian, November 7, 2007 (available at

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/nov/15/news.crime?gusrc=rss&feed=technology);

    Shadowy Russian Firm Seen as Conduit for Cybercrime, Washingtonpost.com, October 13, 2007 (available at

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202461.html); and

    A Walk on the Dark Side, The Economist, August 30, 2007 (available at

    http://economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9723768).

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 12 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 2 of 5

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    41/46

    3

    contacts with these banks, but has not had the opportunity to issue subpoenas. An extension of

    the discovery window is needed to permit PHP to subpoena these banks.

    While we have learned much about the individuals responsible for the advertising

    of illegal online pharmacies, our discovery continues to encounter roadblocks and the new spam

    we are analyzing constantly produces leads that point in helpful, new directions. Additional time

    is needed to overcome these roadblocks and to pursue these new discovery paths.

    For all these reasons, PHP respectfully requests it be granted a two month

    extension to January 28, 2008 to continue John Doe discovery and to name and serve

    defendants.

    LEGAL ARGUMENT

    Courts recognize that, in certain situations, the identity of a defendant may not be

    known prior to the filing of a complaint. In such circumstances, courts authorize a plaintiff to

    undertake discovery to identify the unknown defendant. In Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147,

    1152 (4th Cir. 1978), the Fourth Circuit explained that, if a plaintiff states a meritorious claim

    against an unknown defendant, the Court should allow the plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to

    ascertain the identity of the unknown defendant through discovery. Paulinus Chidi Njoku v.

    Unknown Special Unit Staff, No. 99-7644, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15695, at *2-3 (4th Cir. July

    7, 2000) (remanding the case with instructions to afford plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to

    properly identify the John Does). This power is codified in Rule 26(d), which permits the Court

    to authorize discovery prior to the planning conference contemplated under Rule 26(f).

    In addition to authorizing discovery necessary to identify and serve the John Doe

    defendants, PHP is also seeking an extension of its deadline to name and serve defendants under

    Rule 4(m). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that a plaintiff who shows good cause

    Case 1:07-cv-00419-CMH-TRJ Document 12 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 3 of 5

  • 8/14/2019 Project Honey Pot vs John Does

    42/46

    4

    for failure to effectuate service within 120 days of filing the complaint is entitled to an

    appropriate extension of time to serve. Courts have held that good cause exists and that a

    plaintiff is entitled to additional time to effect service when defendants take affirmative actions

    to avoid service of process. For example, in Ruiz-Varela v. Velez, the District Court dismissed

    the plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve Defendant Figueroa. 814 F.2d

    821 (1st Cir. 1987). Recognizing that Figueroa was attempting to evade personal service by

    concealing his whereabouts, the First Circuit vacated the dismissal. Because Figueroa's attempts

    to conceal his location were designed to frustrate the plaintiff's ability to effectuate service, the

    Court of Appeals explained that dismissal for failure to serve was inappropriate: Evasion of

    service by a putative defendant constitutes good cause for failure to serve under Rule 4[m]. Id.

    at 824. As noted above, the defendants in this case have gone to extreme measures to evade

    identification and