Upload
edward-thompson
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Progress in Implementing the EPA WASP Model for Narragansett Bay
Lucner Charlestra1, Edward Dettmann2
1Postdoc., USEPA, Atlantic Ecology Div., [email protected], Atlantic Ecology Div., [email protected]
CHRP-EPA Modeling WorkshopJuly 7, 2015
Presentation Outline
• Introduction
• Linkage between hydrodynamic and water quality models
• WASP input data
• Simulation results
• Summary/Discussion
2
Introduction
Acknowledgments: Bob Ambrose, Tim Wool, Chris Knights, Jim Hagy Mohamed Abdelrhman, Jason Grear, Hal Walker, Brenda Rashleigh
EPA and CHRP models differ in approach Model segmentation scheme Time step Equation formulation Our model includes organic as well as inorganic N and P
3
Model Linkage
4
5
Linkage between Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Models
EFDC
Hyd File
WASP
Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC) provides hydrodynamics, temperature, salinity
EFDC output is stored for use by WASP
WASP calculates water quality using EFDC output and biochemical kinetics
Model Grid
6
WASP Model Domain:
• 661 segments per layer• 8 Water column layers
(sigma grid)
• 5288 segments total
Segment size is variableTypical segment size:• 640 m east-west• 1220 m north-south EFDC only
Model State Variables
7
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg N L-1) Detrital Phosphorus (mg-P L-1)
Nitrate Nitrogen (mg N L-1) Detrital Silica (mg Si L-1)
Dissolved Organic Nitrogen (mg N L-1) Total Detritus (mg DW L-1)
Inorganic Phosphate (mg P L-1) Salinity (ppt)
Dissolved Organic Phosphorus (mg-P L-1) Benthic Algae (g DW m-2)
Inorganic Silica (mg Si L-1) Periphyton Cell Quota Nitrogen (mg N gDW-1)
Dissolved Organic Silica (mg Si L-1) Periphyton Cell Quota Phosphorus (mg P gDW-1)
CBOD1 (ultimate) (mg O2 L-1) Inorganic Solids 1 (mg DW L-1)
CBOD2 (ultimate) (mg O2 L-1) Inorganic Solids 2 (mg DW L-1)
CBOD3 (ultimate) (mg O2 L-1) Inorganic Solids 3 (mg DW L-1)
Dissolved Oxygen (mg O2 L-1) Phytoplankton 1 (mg Chl a L-1)
Detrital Carbon (mg C L-1) Phytoplankton 2 (mg Chl a L-1)
Detrital Nitrogen (mg N L-1) Phytoplankton 3 (mg Chl a L-1)
Data Sources
• Tributaries• Wastewater Treatment Facilities• Solar Radiation• Atmospheric Deposition• Kinetic Parameters• Benthic Fluxes (SOD and Nutrients)
8
NBC Tributary Monitoring Stations
• Nutrient monitoring • 1 or 2 x per month• USGS flows adjusted to
account for ungauged flows
• Adjusted flows used to calculate loads
• Interpolate loads between monitoring dates
9
Nutrient Loads from WWTFs
10Nixon et al. (1995)
Fields Point, Bucklin Point:• Monitored 3 X per week
Other 9 WWTFs:• Monthly data only
Nutrient Loads from WWTFs (cont.)
• Except for Bucklin and Fields Point Plants, loads calculated as product of monthly “average” concentrations and flows.
• Mass. plants had only 12-month running mean flows
• NH3 sometimes had to be estimated from TKN
• NO2 added to NO3
• Total P only monitored. DIP was estimated as 0.8 TP
• Si not monitored
11
Seaward Boundary
12J. Krumholz (pers. comm.)
• Data for Krumholz Station #3 used for nutrients at seaward boundary
• Data are nominally monthly, but some months are missing
• Data are available only for the surface layer
Solar Radiation
13Solar Radiation at T.F. Green Airport
No locally measured solar radiation for Narragansett Bay for 2009, so used modeled data (National Solar Radiation Data Base) that has same statistical distribution as the local site.
Atmospheric Deposition and Kinetic Constants
Atmospheric deposition (NH3, NO3, ORGN, DIP, ORGP, CBOD) calculated using data from the literature(Nixon et al., 1995; Luo et al. ,2002; Bowen and Valiela, 2001; Yang et al., 1996; Nixon et al., 1995; Chen et al., 1985; Jurado et al., 2008)
Kinetic constants (typical values) from published studies and WASP documentation (Kremer and Nixon, 1978; Wang et al., 1999,(Ambrose and Wool, (undated)
14
Sediment Oxygen Demand
15
SOD based on Fulweiler and Nixon (2010)
Benthic Nutrient Fluxes
Data on nutrient flux rates, including temperature dependence, from a variety of sources: Lindsey Fields (pers. comm.) Fulweiler and Nixon (2010) Kremer and Nixon (1978)
16
Simulation Results
17
Dissolved oxygen
18
Conimicut Pt.,near surface
Conimicut Pt.,bottom
Tributaries & effluentsall 8 layers
Total Nitrogen
19
Conimicut Pt.
Gould I.
Tributaries & effluentsall 8 layers
Total Nitrogen (longitudinal gradient)
20
Fields Pt. Bullock R.
Conimicut.
Warwick Pt. Hope I. N. J’town
Fields Pt.
.
Bullock R.
Conimicut.
Poppasquash Gould I.
East Passage, Fields Pt. Gould I.
West Passage,Fields pt. N. Jamestown
Tribs. & effluentsall 8 layers
Chlorophyll a
210
10
20
30
40
50
60
6/1/2009 6/21/2009 7/11/2009 7/31/2009 8/20/2009 9/9/2009 9/29/2009 10/19/2009
Ch
l a
(mg
/L)
Date
Comparing observed and simulated Chl a at Conimicut Pt. at noon(kwasp = 3, third layer from surface)
Simulated (Dosat)Observed
Mount View, near surface
Conimicut Pt., near surface
Tributaries & effluents top 2 layers
Summary/Discussion 1Simulation Results: At present, we’re simulating one phytoplankton group
Model does better at simulating seasonal patterns of DO and chl a than short-term dynamics
o This is likely caused, at least in part, by low frequency of boundary data, and surrogate solar radiation data
Simulation of seasonal chl a trends is getting close, but needs more work Simulation of seasonal DO trends (surface and bottom) is getting close, but needs more workSimulated longitudinal TN gradients look promising
22
Summary/Discussion 2
Status of Database: Database for some variables is pretty good: e.g. DO, Chl a, salinity, temperature Database for in-estuary nutrients is sparse, especially below Providence River: surface only through 2010, less after that Only TP measured in WWTFs, silica essentially not at all Except for Narragansett Bay Commission Plants, data for nutrients are sketchy No solar radiation measurements on the Bay after 2008
23
Where do we go from here?
Continue exploring effects of nonuniform vertical distribution of WWTF and tributary inputs
We’re improving treatment of benthic nutrient fluxesConsider phytoplankton metabolismContinue calibration of kinetic parameters
24
Slides for possible discussion follow
25
Periphyton Biomass
D : C : N : P : ChlIP
IN
Phytoplankton Biomass
Group 3D : C : N : P : Si: Chl DOGroup 2
D : C : N : P : Si: ChlGroup 1D : C : N : P : Si : Chl
TICH2CO3 – HCO3
- – CO32-
TotalAlkalinity
Particulate Detrital OM
SiPNCD
Dissolved OM
Si
P
N
CBOD1
CBOD2
CBOD3
Inorganic Nutrients
NO3PO4SiO2 NH4
pHpH
atmosphereatmosphere
uptakeexcretion
uptakeexcretion
Inorganic Solids
S3S1 S2
oxid
ation
oxid
ation
nitr
ifica
tion
photosynthesis and respiration
death
dissolution
mineralizationsorption
reaeration
26
State Variables and Processes
DON and DIN in Narragansett BayBaywide and segment-specific mean DON and DIN concentrations and DON/DIN ratios in Narragansett Bay in SINBADD Cruises (1985-1986)*.
*Pilson, M.E.Q. and C.D. Hunt. 1989. Water quality survey of Narragansett Bay: A summary of results from the SINBADD 1985-1986. Marine Ecosystems Research Laboratory. GSO, URI: 124 pp. Available as Report NBEP-89-22 at http://www.nbep.org/publications.html. 27
SINBADD cruise Baywide
DON (mm)Baywide
DIN (mm)Baywide DON/DIN
Range among segments: DON/DIN
October 1985 16.4 7.6 2.2 0.46 - 7.26November 1985 13.6 13.5 1.0 0.27 - 2.35April 1986 10.5 1.0 10.5 1.70 - 26.0May 1986 14.0 1.7 8.2 0.95 - 29.7
DON usage by Bacteria & Flagellates
28
Fraction of DON used by bacteria & heterotrophic flagellates over 8-15 days, by source and season (Seitzinger and Sanders 1997)*.
*Seitzinger, S.P. and R.W. Sanders. Contribution of dissolved organic nitrogen from rivers to estuarine eutrophication. Marine Ecology Progress Series 159: 1-12.
DON source and month Fraction DON used (%)
Length of incubation (days)
Delaware River (April) 72 15Delaware River (June) 40 8Hudson River (June) 40 10
Fraction of DON Used by Bacteria and Phytoplankton
Fraction of DON used over 10 – 12 days, by source (Seitzinger et al. 2002)*.
*Seitzinger, S.P., R.W. Sanders, and R. Styles, Bioavailability of DON from natural and anthropogenic sources to estuarine plankton. Limnology and Oceanography 47(2):353-366.
29
Runoff source Percent DON used (mean ± SD)
Urban/suburban 59 ± 11Agricultural pastures 30 ± 14Coniferous and hardwood forests 23 ± 19