Programa IRI

Instituto de Relaes Internacionais Universidade de So Paulo

Av. Prof. Lcio Martins Rodrigues, s/n,

travessas 4 e 5 - Cidade Universitria

CEP: 05508-020 - So Paulo-SP - Brasil

BRI0007 - TEORIA AVANADA DAS RELAES INTERNACIONAIS

Professores responsveis: Feliciano de S Guimares e Rafael Duarte Villa

Teras-feiras das 13h30 s 17h00 e quintas-feiras das 19h30 s 23h00.

I. Objetivos:

Familiarizar os estudantes com temas, paradigmas e autores centrais na produo

acadmica contempornea em relaes internacionais.

II. Metodologia:

O programa ser desenvolvido na base de aulas expositivas e, eventualmente,

seminrios.

III. Avaliao:

Os alunos (as) de graduao sero avaliados em duas provas individuais com o valor de

8.0 (oito) pontos cada. Os demais pontos sero distribudos em dois fichamentos

individuais.

IV. Contedo Programtico

1. Os realismos defensivo e ofensivo

2. O institucionalismo

3. O desenho e os efeitos das instituies internacionais

4. Os nveis de anlise

5. A escola inglesa

6. As teorias normativas

7. O neo-marxismo

8. A teoria crtica

9. O construtivismo

10. O ps-modernismo

V. Manuais e comentadores:

2

2

Manuais:

VIOTTI, P. e KAUPPI. M. (1999). International Relations Theory: realism, pluralism,

globalism and beyond. Boston: Longman. (procurar 5a edio).

SNIDAL, D. e REUS-SMIT, C. (2008). The Oxford Handbook of International Relations.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

NOGUEIRA, J. e MEZARI, N. (2005). Teoria das Relaes Internacionais. Rio de Janeiro:

Elsevier.

CARLSNAES, W. et al. (2002). Handbook of International Relations. New York: SAGE

Publications.

SMITH, S. et al. (1996). International theory: positivism and beyond.. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Comentadores:

BURCHILL, S. e LINKLATER, A. (org.). (1995) Theories of International Relations. New

York: St. Martin Press. (procurar 5a edio).

VILLA, R. et al. (2010). Clssicos das Relaes Internacionais. So Paulo: Hucitec.

VI. Programa semanal:

Aula introdutria: apresentao do programa e discusso sobre o sentido da Teoria de

Relaes Internacionais.

Textos para debate:

WALT, S. (2005). The Relationship between Theory and Policy in International Relations.

in Annual Review of Political Science, No. 8, 2005, pg. 23-48.

CHECKEL, J. (2012). Theoretical Pluralism in IR: possibilities and limits. in Carlsnaes, W.

et al. Handbook of International Relations. 2a Edio. Londres: Sage

HERMANN, R. (2002). Linking Theory to Evidence in International Relations in

Carlsnaes, W. et al. Handbook of International Relations. 1a Edico. Londres: Sage, pg.

119-136.

I. As perspectivas positivistas:

Aula 1: Os Realismos defensivo e ofensivo

3

3

Textos obrigatrios:

WALTZ, K. (2002). Teoria das Relaes Internacionais. Lisboa: Gradiva, Cap 5 e 6, pg.

113-178.

MEARSHEIMER, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W Norton

and Company, Caps 1 e 2 , pg. 29-54.

Leituras complementares:

BROOKS, S. (1997). Dueling Realisms. in International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 1.

SCHWELLER, R. (1993). Tripolarity and the second war. in International Studies

Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1.

Aula 2 O Institucionalismo

Texto obrigatrio:

KEOHANE, R. (1984). After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political

economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, Caps. 4, 5 e 6, pg. 49-109.

Leituras complementares:

KEOHANE, R. e MARTIN, L. (1995). The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. in

International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1.

GRIECO, J. (1993). Understanding the problem of international cooperation: the limits of

neoliberal institutionalism and the future of realistic theory. in Balwin, D. (ed.),

Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia

University Press, pg. 3-25.

Aula 3 O desenho e os efeitos das instituies internacionais

Textos obrigatrios:

KOREMENOS, B. LIPSON, L. e SNIDAL, D. (2001). The rational design of international

institutions. in International Organization Vol. 55, No. 4.

SIMMONS, B. (1998). Compliance with International Agreements. in Annual Review of

Political Science, Vol. 1.

STEINER, A. e ALMEIDA, M. (2010). Como Saber se as Convenes Internacionais de Meio

Ambiente realmente Funcionam? Abordagens Terico-metodolgicas sobre a Eficcia dos

Regimes Ambientais. in Contexto Internacional, Vol. 32, No. 2

4

4

Leitura complementar:

HELM, C. e SPRINZ, D. (2000). Measuring the Effectiveness of International

Environmental Regimes. in Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 44, No. 5.

MITCHELL, R. e KEIBACH, P. (2001). Situation structure and institutional design:

Reciprocity, coercion, and exchange. in International Organization Vol. 55, No. 4.

MARTIN, L. e SIMMONS, B. (1998). Theories and Empirical Studies of International

Institutions. in International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4.

Aula 4 A relao entre o nvel domstico e a poltica internacional

Textos obrigatrios:

PUTNAM, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. in

International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 1 (traduo na Revista de Sociologia e Poltica).

MILNER, H. (1997) Interests, institutions and information: domestic politics and

international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, Introduo e cap. 2, pg.

33-66.


FEARON, J. (1998). Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy, and Theories of International

Relations. in Annual Review of Political Science, Vol.1, pg. 289-313.

BUENO de MESQUITA, B. (2002). Domestic Politics and International Relations. in

International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 1, pg. 1-10.

Aula 5 A Escola Inglesa

Textos obrigatrios:

BULL, H. (2002). A Sociedade Anrquica: um estudo da ordem na poltica mundial. So

Paulo: Editora da IOESP, Cap. 1 e 2, pg, 7-64.

WATSON, A. (1992). The Evolution of International Society: a comparative historical

analysis. Oxford: Routledge, Introduo e Cap 1, pg. 1-15.


BUZAN, B. (2004). From international to World society? English school theory and the

social structure of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pg. 27-62.

5

5

LINKLATER, A. e SUGANAMI, H. (2006). The English school of international relations: a

contemporary reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pg. 12-80.

Aula 6 O Neo-marxismo

Texto obrigatrio:

WALLERSTEIN, I. (1999). Patterns and Perspectives of the Capitalist World Economy. in

Viotti, P. e Kauppi, M. International Relations Theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and

beyond. Boston: Longman pg, 369-376.


VIGEVANI, T. et al. (2010). A Contribuio Marxista para o Estudo das Relaes

Internacionais. Paper apresentado no 7o Encontro da ABCP, Recife.

Prova bimestral

Aula 7 As Teorias Normativas

Textos obrigatrios:

MORRICE, D. (2000). The liberal-communitarian debate in contemporary political

philosophy and its significance for International Relations. in Review of International

Studies, Vol. 26, pg. 233-246.

ADLER, E. (2005). Communitarian international relations: the epistemic foundations of

International Relations. Oxford: Routledge, pg. 3-14.


GUIMARES, F. (2008). O Debate entre Comunitaristas e Cosmopolitas e as Teorias de

Relaes Internacionais: Rawls como uma Via Mdia. in Contexto Internacional, Vol. 30,

No. 3, pg. 573-583.

COCHRAN, M. (1999). Normative theory in international relations: a pragmatic approach.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pg. 21-44 e 52-72.

II. As perspectivas ps-positivistas

Aula 8 A Teoria Crtica

6

6

Texto obrigatrio:

COX, R. Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations Theory. in

KEOHANE, Robert. (1986). The neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University

Press.


LINKLATER, A. (1992). The question of the next stage in international relations theory: a

critical-theoretical point of view. in Millenium - Journal of International Studies, No. 21.

LINKLATER, A. (1996). The achievement of critical theory, in Smith, S. et al.

International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Aula 9 O Construtivismo

Textos obrigatrios:

WENDT, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power

politics, in International Organization, Vol. 46, No 2.

WENDT, A. (2007). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, Cap. 2, pg. 92-138.


ADLER, E. (1999). O construtivismo no estudo das relaes internacionais. in Lua Nova,

No. 47, pg. 201-246.

FEARON, J. e WENDT, A. (2002). Rationalism v. Constructivism: a skeptical view. in

CARLSNAES, W. et al. Handbook of International Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Publications, 2002, pg. 52-72.

Aula 10 O Ps-modernismo

Texto obrigatrio:

WALKER, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/Outside: international relations as political theory.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cap. 1, pg. 1-25.


DEVETAK, R. (1995). Postmodernism. in Burchill e Linklater (org.). Theories of

International Relations. New York: St. Martin Press.

7

7

BROWN, C. (1994). Critical Theory and postmodernism in international relations, in

Groom, A. e Light, M. Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory. Londres:

Pinter Publishers.

Prova Semestral

Documents

Programa IRI