INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION AND GOVERNANCE STUDIES

IGS

FOUrTh ANNUAl CONFErENCE OF ThE SOCIETy FOr ThE STUDy OF NANOSCIENCE AND EmErGING TEChNOlOGIESOctOber 22-25, 2012

3

Welcome

It is a great pleasure and privilege for me to welcome you to the fourth annual conference of the Society for the Study of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies [S.NET]. I have vivid memories of multiple conversations in the mid-00s about the need for a regular venue to discuss nanoscience and other emerging technologies from a broad multiplicity of view points. After an organizing workshop in 2008 at the University of South Carolina, we launched our first full conference in 2009 at the University of Washington, Seattle. With well-attended and successful annual conferences in Darmstadt (2010), Arizona State (2011) and now at Twente (2012), it is clear that S.NET is filling an important need. The themes that this 4th S.NET conference fills are further testimony to the multiplicity of perspectives that come together in our developing understandings of nanoscience and emerging technologies. There are multiple sessions on governance, technology assessment and regulation, but also on public perception and risk analysis, on the transition from a research environment to commercial products. And these sessions move into multiple fields beyond nanotechnology: systems biology, wind and solar energy, neuroscience, DNA sequencing, to name just a few. This conference confirms the importance of the S.NET mission, first articulated at the 2008 workshop, “The Society for the Study of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies (S.NET) is an international organization to promote open intellectual exchange towards the advancement of knowledge and understanding of nanotechnology in society, including its connections with social and other technological developments. S.NET seeks participation from those working within a diversity of communities, viewpoints, and methodologies, and aspires for its intellectual conversation to be informed by this diversity. S.NET seeks interaction with stakeholders and intermediaries, as those interactions contribute to its core mission.” I close extending for myself and the rest of the S.NET Board our thanks to the many people who have made this rich conference at the University of Twente possible. There are—or seem to be—infinitely many details to putting together an international conference, and this job has been done superbly by the local organizing committee of Marianne Boenink, Marcia Clifford, Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung, Anne Dijkstra, Kornelia Konrad and Evelien Rietberg. A program as rich as this comes from the efforts of a dedicated program committee—Marjolein van Asselt, Andrea Bandelli, Michael G. Bennett, Diana Bowman, Suzan Cozzens, Arianna Ferrari, Julia Guivant, Barbara Herr Harthorn, Ismael Rafols, Arie Rip, John Weckert, Fern Wickson and Jan Youtie. And finally we have sponsors to thank, whose contributions have made this conference possible: the Institute for Innovation and Governance Studies (IGS) of the University of Twente; the Institute for Nanotechnology (MESA+) of the University of Twente; the 3TU Center for Ethics and Technology; the Stichting Universiteitsfonds Twente and NanoNextNL. Davis Baird President, S.NET

4

Table of contents

Welcome __________________________________________________________________________________ 3

Table of contents ___________________________________________________________________________ 4

General information _________________________________________________________________________ 5

Information about University of Twente _________________________________________________________ 6

Keynote speakers ___________________________________________________________________________ 8

Program _________________________________________________________________________________ 11

OECD Workshop ___________________________________________________________________________ 20

Public engagement activities exhibition ________________________________________________________ 22

S.NET Nanolab tours ________________________________________________________________________ 22

Local organizing committee __________________________________________________________________ 23

S.NET board members ______________________________________________________________________ 25

List of participants _________________________________________________________________________ 26

Restaurant suggestions _____________________________________________________________________ 30

Map Campus University of Twente ____________________________________________________________ 32

5

General information

Registration desk The conference registration desk will be staffed throughout the conference. Location of the conference registration desk is building Ravelijn (building nr. 10 on the campus map). Meals Reception On the first day, Monday 22 October, there is an opening conference reception including

tapas snacks; building Waaier (building nr. 12 on the campus map) Lunches On Tuesday 23 and Wednesday 24 October there will be a lunch served in building Ravelijn.

On Friday 25 there will be a take away lunch for everybody at building Waaier. Diner Full conference registration includes one conference diner: Tuesday, October 23, 2012:

Tuindorphotel & Restaurant 't Lansink C.T. Storkstraat 18 7553 AR Hengelo www.hotellansink.com

At 18.45 hrs, at building Ravelijn, there will be busses waiting for you to take you to the restaurant. At 23.00 hrs, you will be picked up at the restaurant to take you back to Hotel De Broeierd, Hotel de Drienerburght and to the University of Twente, building Ravelijn.

Internet access In case you need internet access, please ask a login for the UTGuest network at the registration desk! Phone numbers Conference desk +31-53-489 5845/3423 Medical assistance Santar +31-53-489 8030 Hotel Drienerburght +31-53-433 1366 Hotel De Broeierd +31-53-850 6500 Hotel Star Hengelo +31-74-851 6800 Hotel Logica +31-53-433 1366 Hotel ‘t Lansink +31-74-291 0066 Taxi Luttikhuis +31-53-438 8888 Taxi Maxx +31-53-450 0500 BUILDING 12: WAAIER BUILDING 10: RAVELIJN

6

Information about University of Twente University of Twente High tech, human touch. That is the University of Twente. Some 3,300 scientists and other professionals working together on cutting-edge research, innovations with real-world relevance and inspiring education for more than 9,000 students. The enterprising university encourages students to develop an entrepreneurial spirit and is a partner of Kennispark Twente. For more information: http://www.utwente.nl. Institute for Innovation and Governance Studies (IGS) The Institute for Innovation and Governance Studies is one of the priority research institutes of the University of Twente and performs multi-disciplinary research and postgraduate research training in the field of the governance and management of technological and social innovation. In this, issues of co-ordination, steering and the operation of (networks of) institutions in both public and private sectors are core research foci, based on a multi-level, multi-actor perspective. IGS strives to combine scientific excellence with relevance for our stakeholders in the public and private sector. For more information: http://www.utwente.nl/igs. Institute for Nanotechnology (MESA+) MESA+ is one of the largest nanotechnology research institutes in the world, delivering competitive and successful high quality research. It uses a unique structure, which unites scientific disciplines, and builds fruitful international cooperation to excel in science and education. MESA+ has created a perfect habitat for start-ups in the micro- and nano-industry to establish and to mature. MESA+, Institute for Nanotechnology, is part of the University of Twente, having intensive cooperation with various research groups within the University. The institute employs 500 people of which 275 are PhD’s or postdocs. With its NanoLab facilities the institute holds 1250 m2 of cleanroom space and state of the art research equipment. MESA+ has an integral turnover of 45 million euro per year of which 60% is acquired in competition from external sources. The structure within MESA+ supports and facilitates the researchers and stimulates cooperation actively. MESA+ combines the disciplines of physics, electrical engineering, chemistry and mathematics. Internationally appealing research is achieved through this multidisciplinary approach. It is strengthening its international academic and industrial network by fruitful cooperation programs. MESA+ has been the breeding place for more than 40 high-tech start-ups to date. A targeted program for cooperation with small and medium-sized enterprises is specially set up for start-ups. MESA+ offers the use of its extensive facilities and cleanroom space under friendly conditions. Start-ups and MESA+ work intensively together to promote transfer of knowledge. For more information: http://www.utwente.nl/mesaplus Department of Philosophy The Department of Philosophy at the University of Twente is internationally leading in the philosophy and ethics of technology. The research of the department, partly carried out in the context of the 3TU.Center of Excellence for Ethics and Technology, aims at a philosophical analysis of technology and its role in contemporary society, both from an interpretive as well as a normative stance. Ultimately, this philosophical analysis is to contribute to a better role of technology in society, for instance by stimulating better research and design practices, better policies, and better public debates about technology. Distinct features of the research carried out at the department are its focus on the social and cultural consequences of contemporary technology, its naturalistic or “empirically informed” orientation towards technology, its constructivism, and its focus on ICT, biomedical technology and nanotechnology. For more information: http://www.utwente.nl/gw/wijsb/ The Department of Science, Technology, and Policy Studies (STePS), led by Prof. Stefan Kuhlmann, takes the assessment and governance of innovations and emerging technologies as its central theme of teaching and research. STePS considers in particular strategic issues that are multidisciplinary: they involve developments in science, technology, politics and society, as well as interaction between them. Studies conducted within STəPS link analytical and normative perspectives, and consider not only technological innovations but also

7

innovations in governance. Emerging science and technologies as nanotechnology and genomics are important empirical research areas. For further information see http://www.utwente.nl/mb/steps/

8

Keynote speakers Dave Blank. After a research fellowship at Stanford in the group of prof. Malcolm Beasley and prof. Theodore Geballe in 1998, he was appointed as associate professor and programme director on the materials science of interfaces in the MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology at the University of Twente. Since October 2002 he is full professor in Inorganic Materials Science at the same university. From January 1, 2007 he is the Scientific Director of MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente. Dave H.A. Blank’s Inorganic Materials Science research group focuses on growth studies, deposition and structuring techniques, and properties of complex materials, especially oxides. The group developed strategies to build, in an atomic layer-by-layer fashion, inorganic materials by true atomic-deposition control and which thereby exhibit novel and unprecedented properties. His research is based in large part on inventing designer-inorganic (tailor-made) nanomaterials that are prepared by atomic precision. Many of his latest discoveries and contributions have enabled the synthesis of materials, allowing for practical applications in the fabrication of artificial high-temperature superconductors and ferroelectric superlattices. At this present time, many of the structures are being used in the fabrication of two-dimensional electron gasses in the field of interface engineering of complex oxide heterostructures. Nowadays, the field of study is considered as a key research area for future oxide device developments. From November 2010 on he is chairman of the executive Board of the FES programme, called NanoNextNl. In February 2011 he has been appointed as Captain of Science of the Topsector High Tech Systems and Materials by the Dutch Government. In 2011 he was awarded by STW to become Simon Stevin Meester 2011, for his achievements in technical sciences. In 2012 he was appointed Advisory Council for Science and Technology Policy (AWT) that advises the Dutch government and parliament on policy in the areas of scientific research, technological development and innovation. Antje Grobe is Senior Researcher / Project Manager University of Stuttgart, Germany, at ZIRN - Interdisciplinary Research Unit on Risk Governance and Sustainable Technology Development Managing Director, DIALOG BASIS At the University of Stuttgart (ZIRN Interdisciplinary Research Unit on Risk Governance and Sustainable Technology Development), Germany, Antje Grobe is Senior Researcher and Project Manager of national and international research projects on risk perception and the awareness of emerging technologies. She was responsible for the German part of the European FP7 funded Project NanoCode (2010-2011), for a perception study “Nanotechnology: What consumers want to know” for the German Consumer Associations (2008) and the study “NanoMedizin” on behalf of the Friedrich-Ebert-Foundation (2008); 2007-2008 for a study on Nanotechnologies in Food and Cosmetics on behalf of the International Risk Governance Councils (IRGC); and for the German Expert-Delphi on Nanotechnologies on behalf of the German Federal Institute of Risk Assessment (2006). She gives lectures on Professional Skills and Dialogue Management at the University of Stuttgart and on Risk Management and Communication at the University of St. Gall, Switzerland. Antje Grobe has facilitated stakeholder dialogues and citizen participation processes on nanotechnologies, energy transition and climate change, genetically modified organisms, stem cells and brain science for more than 17 years. Since 2004 her main emphasis is on nanotechnologies. She facilitated or contributed to more than 120 stakeholder dialogues, expert workshops, scientific conferences, focus groups and consumer conferences on issues such as occupational health, risk assessment, regulation, information and transparency. She serves as a scientific expert and facilitator for the European Commission since 2008, is Member of the Expert-Board “Society and Technic” of The Association of German Engineers (VDI); Member of the Nanotechnology Advisory Board of the Swiss Government; and Member of the MediationsAllianz Baden-Württemberg. She was Scientific Advisor of the German Government’s NanoKommission 2006-2011; and was Member of the Board of the Swiss Risk Dialogue Foundation 2009-2011.

9

Michael E. Gorman earned a Masters (1978) and a PhD (1981) in Social Psychology at the University of New Hampshire. He is a Professor in the Department of Science, Technology & Society at the University of Virginia, where he teaches courses on ethics, invention, psychology of science and communication. Currently he is working as a Program Director in the Science, Technology & Society program at the National Science Foundation. His research interests include experimental simulations of science, described in Simulating Science (Indiana University Press, 1992) and cognition, invention and ethics, described in Transforming Nature (Kluwer Academic Press, 1998). With support from the NSF, he conducted a multi-year cognitive study of the invention of the telephone whose results appeared in Social Studies of Science and Thinking and Reasoning. NSF supported his work with Patricia Werhane on case studies that combined ethics, invention and design, described in Ethical and Environmental Challenges to Engineering (Prentice-Hall, 2000). NSF also supported work that led to his edited volumes on Scientific and Technological Thinking (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005), and Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration (MIT Press, 2010) He is a member of the editorial boards of the Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology and TopiCS in Cognitive Science—for the latter, he edited a special issue on Cognition in Science and Technology. He did a two-year rotation as an NSF STS program director. His current research is in the kind of interdisciplinary trading zones that will be needed for scientists, engineers and other stakeholders to collaborate on the development of new technologies. Chris Groves' work focuses on how people and institutions negotiate and deal with an intrinsically uncertain future – one increasingly imagined against the backdrop of global environmental change and accelerating technological innovation. Along with the ethical and political implications of a range of future-oriented discourses and practices (e.g. risk management, precautionary regulation, building resilience), he examines how our ideas about what it means for individuals and whole societies to take responsibility for their futures are being changed by emerging technologies (such as the convergence between bio- and nanotechnology and personalised genetic testing). The monograph Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics (Brill, 2007), co-authored with Professor Barbara Adam (Social Science, Cardiff University), examines these themes in depth. Pierre-Benoit Joly, economist and sociologist, is Directeur de recherche at the National Institute of Agronomic Research (INRA) in France. He holds a degree in agronomy (1982), a PhD in economics (1987) and the “Habilitation à diriger les recherches” (1995). He is the Director of the IFRIS (Institute For Research, Innovation and Society) and for Laboratory of Excellence (LabEx) SITES. His research activities are focused on the governance of collective risks, socio-technical controversies, the use of scientific advice in public decision making and the forms of public participation in scientific activities. He was a Member of the expert group “Science and Governance”, at the European Commission and he is member of the Council of EASST. He has published about one hundred papers (of which more than 50 in refereed journals), four books and he has coordinated five special issues of social sciences journals. He lectures at Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) on « Science, expertise and public debate » and at Sciences Po Paris on Risk Governance. Koert van Mensvoort. MFA MSc studied computer science, art and philosophy; he currently works on the cross-section of these disciplines. Van Mensvoort does not work in one specific medium or style, but rather, picks the most suitable medium with every concept – ranging from essays, documentaries, installations, games, paintings, websites or events. Van Mensvoort uses art & design as a means to materialize philosophy. His most profound experience in life, so far, has been the discovery of Next Nature, which revolves around the idea that our technological world is so omnipresent, intricate and complex, that it becomes a nature of its own. Thematically, all his work revolves around this topic. Van Mensvoort directs the Next Nature Network; an Amsterdam based think and design tank on the changing relation between people, nature and technology. Furthermore he heads the Next Nature Lab at the Industrial Design Department of the Eindhoven University of Technology. Pat Mooney has more than four decades experience working in international civil society, first addressing aid and development issues and then focusing on food, agriculture and commodity trade. In 1977 Mooney co-founded RAFI (Rural Advancement Fund International, renamed ETC Group in 2001). He received The Right

10

Livelihood Award (the "Alternative Nobel Prize") in the Swedish Parliament in 1985 and the Pearson Peace Prize from Canada's Governor General in 1998. He has also received the American "Giraffe Award" given to people "who stick their necks out." The author or co-author of several books on the politics of biotechnology and biodiversity, Pat Mooney is widely regarded as an authority on issues of global governance, corporate concentration, and intellectual property monopoly. Although much of ETC's work continues to emphasize plant genetic resources and agricultural biodiversity, the work expanded in the early 1980s to include biotechnology. In the late 1990s, the work expanded more to encompass a succession of emerging technologies such as nanotechnology, synthetic biology, geoengineering, and new developments in genomics and neurosciences. ETC remains a nano-CSO with offices in Canada, the United States, Mexico, the Philippines and Ethiopia and works in close cooperation with many civil society partners around the world. Daan Schuurbiers is director of the Pilot Plant (De Proeffabriek), a consultancy for responsible innovation. Daan studied chemistry and philosophy at the University of Amsterdam and has a PhD in ethics of technology from Delft University of Technology. His research efforts have focused on the design of new forms of collaboration between social and natural scientists, with the aim to integrate socio-ethical reflection in early stages of research. He now combines his research and management skills in his work for the Pilot Plant, advising on ways to encourage reflection in research and to strengthen stakeholder engagement with science and technology. Christos. Tokamanis isHead of Unit at European Commission.

11

Prog

ram

M

onda

y 22

-10

Tues

day

23-1

0 W

edne

sday

24-

10

Thur

sday

25-

10

9.

00–1

0.30

Pan

els*

* (L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

)

9.00

–11.

00 P

anel

s (Lo

catio

n: R

avel

ijn)

9.00

–10.

30 P

anel

s (Lo

catio

n: R

avel

ijn)

10

.30–

11.0

0 Co

ffee

brea

k (L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

) 11

.00–

11.3

0 Co

ffee

brea

k (L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

) 10

.30–

11.0

0 Co

ffee

brea

k (L

ocat

ion:

Ra

velij

n)

Pre-

conf

eren

ce e

vent

S

.NET

Nan

olab

tour

, see

web

site

11

.00–

12.0

0 Pl

enar

y (L

ocat

ion:

Waa

ier 2

) Ch

ris G

rove

s Chr

is G

rove

s - H

orizo

ns o

f car

e:

from

futu

re im

agin

arie

s to

resp

onsib

le

inno

vatio

n

11.3

0–12

.30

Plen

ary

(Loc

atio

n: W

aaie

r 2)

Koer

t van

Men

svoo

rt –

NAN

O S

uper

mar

ket

11.0

0-12

.00

Pane

ls (L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

)

12

.00–

13.0

0 Lu

nch

+ Po

ster

sess

ion

+ Pu

blic

En

gage

men

t Exh

ibiti

on

(Loc

atio

n: R

avel

ijn)

12.3

0–13

.30

Lunc

h +

Post

er se

ssio

n +

Publ

ic

Enga

gem

ent E

xhib

ition

(Loc

atio

n: R

avel

ijn)

12.1

5–13

.15

Plen

ary

(Loc

atio

n: W

aaie

r 2)

Pier

re B

enoi

t-Jo

ly -G

over

ning

Em

ergi

ng

Tech

nolo

gies

– T

he n

eed

to th

ink

out o

f the

bl

ack

box

13.0

0–14

.30

Pane

ls (L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

)

13.3

0–15

.00

Pane

ls (L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

) 13

.15

Take

Aw

ay L

unch

(Loc

atio

n: W

aaie

r)

15.0

0 –

16.0

0 Re

gist

ratio

n (L

ocat

ion:

W

aaie

r)

14.3

0–15

.00

Coffe

e br

eak

(Loc

atio

n: R

avel

ijn)

15

.00–

15.3

0 Co

ffee

brea

k (L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

)

16.0

0 –

16.1

5 O

peni

ng re

mar

ks (L

ocat

ion:

W

aaie

r 2)

15.0

0–16

.30

Pane

ls (L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

)

15.3

0–17

.00

Pane

ls (L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

)

16.1

5 –

18.0

0 Pl

enar

y pr

esen

tatio

ns a

nd

disc

ussio

n (L

ocat

ion:

Waa

ier 2

) Da

ve B

lank

, Chr

isto

s Tok

aman

is, P

at

Moo

ney

- Em

ergi

ng te

chno

logi

es –

Fro

m

Tech

nolo

gy P

ush

to S

ocie

tal P

ull

16.3

0-16

.45

Coffe

e br

eak

(Loc

atio

n: R

avel

ijn)

17.0

0–17

.15

Brea

k (L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

)

18.0

0 –2

1.00

Ope

ning

rece

ptio

n (L

ocat

ion

Waa

ier,

foye

r)

16.4

5–17

.45

Plen

ary

(Loc

atio

n: W

aaie

r 2)

Antje

Gro

be

17.1

5 –

18.1

5 Pl

enar

y (L

ocat

ion:

Waa

ier 2

) M

icha

el G

orm

an &

Daa

n Sc

huur

bier

s -

Com

preh

ensiv

e Sc

ienc

e an

d Te

chno

logy

En

gage

men

t

18

.45

Buss

es fr

om R

avel

ijn to

Con

fere

nce

Dine

r 18

.30-

19.

30 S

.NET

bus

ines

s mee

ting

19

.30–

23.0

0 Co

nfer

ence

Din

er

Loca

tion:

Het

Lan

sink,

Hen

gelo

12

Mon

day

22 O

ctob

er 2

012

15.0

0 –

16.0

0 Re

gist

ratio

n an

d ge

t tog

ethe

r. Lo

catio

n: W

aaie

r, en

tran

ce h

all d

owns

tairs

16

.00

– 16

.15

Ope

ning

rem

arks

. Loc

atio

n: W

aaie

r 2

16.1

5 –

18.0

0 Pl

enar

y di

scus

sion

CHRI

STO

S TO

KAM

ANIS

, DAV

E BL

ANK,

PAT

MO

ON

EY.

Emer

ging

tech

nolo

gies

– F

rom

Tec

hnol

ogy

Push

to S

ocie

tal P

ull

Loca

tion:

Waa

ier 2

18

.00

– 21

.00

Ope

ning

rece

ptio

n. L

ocat

ion:

Waa

ier,

foye

r

Tues

day

23 O

ctob

er 2

012

9.00

–10.

30

Para

llel s

essio

ns

Loca

tion:

Ra

velij

n

S1A

Stra

nd 3

N

EW A

PPRO

ACHE

S TO

GO

VERN

ANCE

AN

D TA

Ch

air:

Cuijp

ers (

tbc)

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 15

01

S1B

Stra

nd 3

RE

SPO

NSI

BLE

INN

OVA

TIO

N A

ND

GOVE

RNAN

CE

APPR

OAC

HES

Chai

r: Be

nnet

t (tb

c)

Room

: Rav

elijn

RA

2501

S1C

Stra

nd 4

AS

SESS

ING

ANTI

CIPA

TORY

PR

ACTI

CES

Chai

r: Ri

p Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

02

S1D

Stra

nd 5

PU

BLIC

RIS

K PE

RCEP

TIO

NS

Chai

r: Co

rmic

k Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

03

S1E

Stra

nd 6

BI

OTE

CHN

OLO

GY

AND

SUST

AIN

ABIL

ITY

Chai

r: Fe

rrar

i Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

04

Si

mak

ova

& C

oene

n Se

lf-re

flect

ion

in th

e po

st-

posit

ivist

gov

erna

nce

of n

ewly

em

ergi

ng te

chno

scie

nces

Rand

les &

Lar

edo

Rese

arch

ing

Resp

onsib

le

Inno

vatio

n an

d Re

spon

sible

Gov

erna

nce:

Re

flect

ions

on

Socia

l In

quiry

and

Met

hod

Ciar

li, C

oad

& R

afol

s O

peni

ng u

p th

e Fu

ture

: an

Asse

smen

t of

Tech

nolo

gy F

utur

es

Anal

ysis

Colli

ns

Publ

ic Re

spon

ses t

o Na

note

chno

logy

: Risk

s to

the

Socia

l Fab

ric?

Bos,

Van

Len

te &

Pei

ne

Dyna

mics

of a

rtic

ulat

ion

in n

anot

echn

olog

y:

com

parin

g fix

ed a

nd

fluid

funn

els f

or

‘sust

aina

bilit

y’

Fo

nsec

a Br

azili

an N

anos

cient

ists’

Conc

eptio

ns a

bout

Ant

icipa

tory

Go

vern

ance

Pra

ctice

s:

evid

ence

s of u

naw

aren

ess a

nd

rece

ptiv

ity

Boen

ink

Antic

ipat

ing

the

futu

re

by w

ay o

f sce

nario

s:

hubr

is or

resp

onsib

le

gove

rnan

ce?

Clau

dia

Schw

arz

Firin

g an

d re

stric

ting

imag

inat

ion:

Tac

klin

g th

e do

uble

-edg

ed ch

arac

ter o

f an

alog

ies i

n de

bate

s ab

out e

mer

ging

te

chno

scie

nces

Ner

esin

i Fi

ve y

ears

late

r. Tr

ansf

orm

atio

ns in

the

socia

l rep

rese

ntat

ions

on

nan

otec

hnol

ogy

in

Italy

(200

6 an

d 20

11)

Wic

kson

Irr

espo

nsib

le &

Un

ethi

cal S

cienc

e fo

r Po

licy:

The

En

viro

nmen

tal

Gove

rnan

ce o

f Ag

ricul

tura

l Bi

otec

hnol

ogy

Va

n de

r Laa

n, C

uijp

ers &

Bo

enin

k Ne

w a

nd e

mer

ging

HTA

-pr

actic

es o

f ear

ly A

lzhei

mer

di

agno

stics

Wal

hout

Ri

sk g

over

nanc

e ar

enas

–

the

case

of n

anos

afet

y go

vern

ance

in T

he

Net

herla

nds

Ried

er

Nano

Fut

ures

in th

e M

akin

g: O

n th

e M

odal

ities

of S

ocia

l-Sc

ient

ific S

cena

rio

Build

ing

Corm

ick

A Pr

ecau

tiona

ry T

ale

Smith

Ex

plor

ing

the

func

tion

of ‘r

efle

ctiv

e to

ols’

in

bioe

nerg

y: e

xam

inin

g ac

tors

’ con

stru

ctio

ns o

f re

spon

sibili

ty

10.3

0–11

.00

Coffe

e br

eak.

Loc

atio

n: R

avel

ijn, d

own

in h

all

13

11.0

0–12

.00

Pl

enar

y le

ctur

e CH

RIS

GRO

VES

Horiz

ons o

f car

e: fr

om fu

ture

imag

inar

ies t

o re

spon

sible

inno

vatio

nLo

catio

n: W

aaie

r 2

12.0

0–13

.00

Lu

nch

brea

k +

post

er se

ssio

n +

publ

ic e

ngag

emen

t exh

ibiti

on. L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

, dow

n in

hal

l

Tues

day

23 O

ctob

er 2

012

13.0

0–14

.30

Pa

ralle

l ses

sions

Lo

catio

n:

Rave

lijn

S2A

Stra

nd 1

R&

D EN

GAGE

MEN

T AN

D CO

LLO

ABO

RATI

ON

Ch

air:

Herr

Har

thor

n Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 15

01

S2B

Stra

nd 4

PA

NEL

M

OBI

LIZI

NG

UTO

PIAS

: TR

ACIN

G TH

E HI

STO

RICA

L SO

CIO

LOGY

O

F ‘E

MER

GIN

G TE

CHN

OLO

GY’

Chai

r: Ko

nrad

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

01

S2C

Stra

nd 3

RE

SPO

NSI

BLE

NAN

OTE

CHN

OLO

GICA

L DE

VELO

PMEN

T Ch

air:

Wal

hout

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

02

S2D

Stra

nd 4

SI

TUAT

ED

EXPE

CTAT

ION

S (A

ND

IMAG

INAR

IES)

Ch

air:

Stem

erdi

ng

Room

: Rav

elijn

RA

2503

S2E

Stra

nd 5

CO

NSU

MER

S RE

SPO

NSE

S &

HIG

H SC

HOO

L SE

TTIN

GS

Chai

r: tb

a Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

04

S2F

Stra

nd 6

RO

UN

DTAB

LE

GLO

BAL

HARM

ON

IES

AND

THE

WIS

DOM

OF

NAN

OTE

CHN

OLO

GY

Chai

r: N

ordm

ann

Room

: Rav

elijn

RA

4334

N

ydal

, Efs

tath

iou

& L

aegr

eid

Wid

enin

g th

e cir

cles o

f co

llabo

ratio

n - I

nteg

ratin

g ph

iloso

phy

in sy

stem

s bio

logy

Eard

ley-

Pryo

r Pl

anet

Nan

o-to

pia:

Na

note

chno

logy

and

Na

ture

in a

Tec

hno-

Utop

ia

Bukh

t & R

andl

es

Inte

rven

tion

of th

e St

ate

on R

espo

nsib

le

Deve

lopm

ent o

f Na

note

chno

logi

es in

Ca

nada

Beum

er

Expe

ctat

ions

of

nano

tech

nolo

gies

in

Indi

a, S

outh

Afr

ica a

nd

Keny

a

Kitis

riwor

apha

n Kn

owle

dge

and

attit

ude

tow

ards

safe

ty a

nd

ethi

cs o

f na

note

chno

logy

Nor

dman

n, W

ang

et a

l Ca

n th

e de

liber

atio

n of

et

hica

l and

socie

tal

dim

ensio

ns o

f na

note

chno

logy

wor

k on

a g

loba

l sca

le,

draw

ing

toge

ther

cu

ltura

lly d

iver

se

regi

ons o

f the

wor

ld?

Wha

t rol

e m

ight

pr

uden

tial a

ppro

ache

s an

d qu

estio

ns o

f fe

asib

ility

pla

y?

M

ahoo

tian

Inno

vatio

n by

dise

quili

briu

m

Frie

dman

To

Infin

ity a

nd B

eyon

d:

The

In-S

ilico

Lim

its o

f Se

lf-Re

plica

ting

Nano

As

sem

bler

s

Fole

y, W

etm

ore,

Be

nnet

t, W

iek

& G

usto

n Ap

plie

d Na

noet

hics

: who

is

resp

onsib

le fo

r wha

t?

Felt

Arch

eolo

gy o

f en

gage

men

t: Ci

tizen

s’ po

sitio

ning

wor

k to

war

ds n

eo-

tech

nolo

gies

Ferm

ont,

Gro

othu

is-

Oud

shoo

rn &

IJze

rman

M

easu

ring

publ

ic pr

efer

ence

s for

co

lore

ctal

canc

er

scre

enin

g us

ing

new

ge

nom

e---b

ased

na

note

chno

logi

es

Di

jkm

an, D

ijkst

ra, V

an W

oerk

um

& T

erw

oert

Ho

w to

regu

late

and

co

mm

unica

te n

anom

ater

ials’

he

alth

risk

s in

the

face

of

unce

rtai

nty?

Resu

lts o

f a

stak

ehol

der d

ialo

gue

with

exp

erts

Konr

ad

Com

men

tary

Do

ridot

Th

e di

ffere

nt m

odel

s of

ethi

cal g

over

nanc

e of

na

note

chno

logy

Bits

ch

Nego

tiatin

g ex

pect

atio

ns in

the

enco

unte

r bet

wee

n ge

nom

ics a

nd a

sthm

a re

sear

ch

Liso

tti,

Gold

oni &

De

Renz

i Na

note

chno

logy

at H

igh

Scho

ol: T

here

’s pl

enty

of

Phys

ics a

t the

bot

tom

!

14.3

0–15

.00

Co

ffee

brea

k. L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

, dow

n in

hal

l

14

Tues

day

23 O

ctob

er 2

012

15.0

0–16

.30

Pa

ralle

l ses

sions

Lo

catio

n:

Rave

lijn

S3A

Stra

nd 2

TR

ACIN

G TH

E EM

BEDD

ING

OF

NAN

OTE

CHN

OLO

GY IN

IN

DUST

RY

Chai

r: Yo

utie

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

01

S3B

Stra

nd 3

RI

SK G

OVE

RNAN

CE

Chai

r: W

icks

on (t

bc)

Room

: Rav

elijn

RA

2502

S3C

NET

S PR

OJE

CT

Chai

r: Ad

amic

k Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

03

OEC

D W

ORK

SHO

P PU

BLIC

EN

GAG

EMEN

T (d

iffer

ent t

imes

lot 1

4.45

-16.

40,

Rave

lijn

1501

and

hal

l)

Vo

n Ra

esfe

ld, G

eurt

s & Ja

nsen

W

hen

is a

netw

ork

a ne

xus f

or

inno

vatio

n? :

A st

udy

of p

ublic

pr

ivat

e na

note

chno

logy

R&

D pr

ojec

ts in

the

Neth

erla

nds

Van

der P

oel

New

tech

nolo

gies

as

socia

l exp

erim

ents

Adam

ick

et a

l Sh

arin

g In

tern

atio

nal

Rese

arch

and

Lea

rnin

g To

ols o

f Nan

oscie

nce

and

Emer

ging

Tec

hnol

ogie

s in

Socie

ty: S

trat

egy

and

Chal

leng

es

Corm

ick

cs

OEC

D w

orks

hop

Publ

ic En

gage

men

t

Co

ccia

& W

ang

Emer

ging

nan

o-te

chno

logi

cal

rese

arch

for f

utur

e pa

thw

ay o

f bi

omed

icine

Spru

it Co

ntex

tual

izing

the

expe

rimen

tal n

atur

e of

na

note

chno

logi

es

La

uret

h &

Inve

rniz

zi Ed

ucat

ing

nano

tech

nolo

gy

wor

kfor

ce in

Bra

zil: c

ompa

nies

’ de

man

ds a

nd u

nive

rsity

supp

ly

Door

n Te

chno

logi

e as

socia

l ex

perim

ents

: Cha

lleng

es

for r

egul

atio

n an

d go

vern

ance

risk

s 16

.30–

16.4

5

Brea

k to

wal

k to

Waa

ier

16.4

5–17

.45

Pl

enar

y Le

ctur

e AN

TJE

GRO

BE L

ocat

ion:

Waa

ier 2

18

.45

Buss

es le

avin

g fr

om R

avel

ijn to

the

rest

aura

nt

19.1

5–23

.00

Co

nfer

ence

Din

ner.

Loca

tion:

rest

aura

nt H

et L

ansin

k, H

enge

lo.

23.0

0 Bu

sses

leav

ing

from

rest

aura

nt to

hot

els a

nd R

avel

ijn

15

Wed

nesd

ay 2

4 O

ctob

er 2

012

9.00

–11.

00

Para

llel s

essio

ns

Loca

tion:

Ra

velij

n

S4A

Stra

nd 2

PAN

EL

WIL

L CH

INA’

S EF

FORT

TO

BE

COM

E A

HIGH

-TEC

H IN

NO

VATO

R SU

CCEE

D?

Mod

erat

or: M

ehta

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 15

01

S4B

Stra

nd 3

RO

UN

D TA

BLE

RESP

ON

SIBL

E TE

CHN

OLO

GY

GOVE

RNAN

CE

Chai

r: Fo

rsbe

rg

Room

: Rav

elijn

RA

2501

S4C

Stra

nd 4

PAN

EL

CON

VERG

ING

TECH

NO

LOGI

ES L

OST

IN

IMAG

INAT

ION

? Ch

air:

Te K

ulve

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

02

S4D

Stra

nd 5

PAN

EL

PUBL

IC IN

TERE

ST

GRO

UPS

AN

D PU

BLIC

EN

GAGE

MEN

T Ch

air:

Enge

man

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

03

S4E

Stra

nd 1

RO

UN

D TA

BLE

WHO

ARE

TE

CHN

OSC

IEN

TIFI

C O

BJEC

TS?

Chai

r: Sc

hwar

z Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

04

S4F

Stra

nd 5

W

ORK

SHO

P ST

S CO

NCE

PTS

AND

EDU

CATI

ON

AL

APPR

OAC

HES

Ch

air:

Benn

ett

Room

: Rav

elijn

RA

2336

Sim

on

Chin

a’s E

volv

ing

Role

in

Inte

rnat

iona

l S&

T Af

fairs

Fors

berg

, Pal

dam

Fo

lker

, De

Bakk

er,

Rom

met

veit

& S

tran

d Fr

amew

orks

for

asse

ssin

g em

ergi

ng

scie

nce

and

tech

nolo

gies

: are

we

head

ing

tow

ards

in

crea

sed

inte

grat

ion

and,

if so

, is t

his t

he ri

ght

road

to re

spon

sible

te

chno

logy

gov

erna

nce?

Koks

ma

Bett

er B

rain

s for

the

Futu

re: M

yths

and

Dr

eam

s of E

duca

tiona

l Ne

uros

cienc

e

Enge

man

, Ear

l & H

err

Hart

horn

N

on-G

over

nmen

tal

Org

aniza

tions

and

Na

note

chno

logi

es

Futu

res

Schw

arz,

Van

den

Bur

g,

Ellio

tt, N

ordm

ann,

Lo

eve

& M

ilbur

n Te

chno

scie

ntifi

c obj

ects

ar

e co

oper

ativ

e in

stea

d of

intr

acta

ble

or

reca

lcitr

ant,

show

re

latio

nal a

fford

ance

s in

stea

d of

hav

ing

cons

tant

disp

ositi

ons

and

are

char

acte

rized

ra

ther

thro

ugh

pote

ncy

than

by

subs

tanc

e

Benn

ett,

Herr

ing,

O

stm

an, W

etm

ore

STS

Conc

epts

and

Ed

ucat

iona

l App

roac

hes

for E

ngag

ing

the

Publ

ic in

Nan

otec

hnol

ogy

and

Soci

ety

Ca

o Tr

ajec

tory

of C

hina

’s Hi

gh-T

ech

Deve

lopm

ent:

The

“Gro

win

g Pa

ins/

Prem

atur

e Se

nilit

y” T

hesis

Rev

isite

d

Ruiv

enka

mp

Prom

ises o

f Per

sona

lized

M

edici

ne

Inve

rniz

zi &

Fol

ador

i Tr

ade

Unio

ns’ c

once

rns

and

actio

ns re

gard

ing

nano

tech

nolo

gy ri

sks

Yo

utie

& K

ay

Emer

ging

tech

nolo

gies

and

co

rpor

ate

stra

tegi

es

The

case

of n

anot

echn

olog

y fo

r en

ergy

stor

age

solu

tions

Te K

ulve

, Kon

rad,

Alv

ial

Pala

vici

no &

Wal

hout

Th

e co

ntex

t of a

pplic

atio

n in

the

gene

ratio

n of

pr

omise

s and

con

cern

s

Cort

es-L

obos

Ad

voca

cy G

roup

s Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

in th

e Pu

blic

U.S.

Agr

ifood

Na

note

chno

logy

Re

sear

ch A

gend

a

Met

ha

Inte

rnat

iona

l Col

labo

ratio

n in

th

e Ch

ines

e Sc

ient

ific

Com

mun

ity

Lam

prou

Na

no v

s. Bi

o: N

GOs a

nd

Regu

lato

ry P

olicy

M

akin

g in

the

EU

G

ebbi

e, H

an &

Sto

ckin

g Is

Chin

a Be

com

ing

a Na

note

chno

logy

Lea

der?

Su

cces

ses a

nd C

halle

nges

in

Suzh

ou In

dust

rial P

ark

16

11.0

0–11

.30

Coffe

e br

eak.

Loc

atio

n: R

avel

ijn, d

own

in h

all

11.3

0–12

.30

Pl

enar

y le

ctur

e KO

ERT

VAN

MEN

SVO

ORT

NAN

O S

uper

mar

ket L

ocat

ion:

Waa

ier 2

12

.20–

13.3

0

Lunc

h br

eak

+ po

ster

sess

ion

+ pu

blic

eng

agem

ent e

xhib

ition

. Loc

atio

n: R

avel

ijn, d

own

in h

all

Wed

nesd

ay 2

4 O

ctob

er 2

012

13.3

0–15

.00

Pa

ralle

l se

ssio

ns

Loca

tion:

Ra

velij

n

S5A

Stra

nd 1

R&

D IN

THE

BIO

SCIE

NCE

S Ch

air:

Rafo

ls Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 15

01

S5B

Stra

nd 3

RE

GULA

TIO

N O

F N

ANO

TECH

NO

LOGY

Ch

air:

Bow

man

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

01

S5C

Stra

nd 3

ST

AKEH

OLD

ER

PART

ICIP

ATIO

N A

ND

ENGA

GEM

ENT

1 Ch

air:

Bits

ch

Room

: Rav

elijn

RA

2502

S5D

Stra

nd 2

TR

ACIN

G TH

E EM

BEDD

ING

OF

NAN

OTE

CHN

OLO

GY IN

IN

DUST

RY

Chai

r: Sh

apira

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

03

S6D

Stra

nd 5

PU

BLIC

CO

NCE

RNS

Chai

r: Ba

ndel

li Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

03

S5F

Stra

nd 6

EM

ERGI

NG

TECH

NO

LOGI

ES,

MO

RALI

TY A

ND

ETHI

CS

Chai

r: va

n de

r Sch

eer

Room

: Rav

elijn

Pr

ojec

troo

m

Ef

stat

hiou

, Nyd

al, L

aegr

id,

Kuip

er &

Car

usi

Whe

n kn

owle

dge

beco

mes

so

met

hing

to m

anag

e

Reic

how

& D

orbe

ck-Ju

ng

Soft

Regu

latio

n In

stru

men

ts fo

r Sa

fegu

ardi

ng

Occ

upat

iona

l Hea

lth a

nd

Safe

ty in

the

Wor

k w

ith

Nano

mat

eria

ls: T

he U

se

of a

Typ

olog

y

Van

Est,

Stem

erdi

ng,

Wal

hout

, Rer

imas

si &

Ha

nsse

n Th

e ne

ed fo

r a

com

preh

ensiv

e vi

ew o

n pu

blic

enga

gem

ent i

n sc

ienc

e an

d te

chno

logy

- Th

e ca

se o

f na

note

chno

logy

in th

e N

ethe

rland

s

Robi

nson

Be

spok

e in

dica

tors

of

socio

-eco

nom

ic im

pact

of

nan

otec

hnol

ogy:

im

pact

ass

essm

ent

chal

leng

es a

nd p

oint

ers

for n

ano-

invo

lved

in

dust

rial v

alue

cha

ins

Schu

man

n En

coun

terin

g “N

anof

ood”

. Ho

w A

ustr

ian

Citiz

ens

Appr

opria

te a

n Em

ergi

ng T

echn

olog

y in

th

e Fi

eld

of F

ood

and

Nutr

ition

Swie

rstr

a Th

e te

chni

cal m

edia

tion

of th

e go

od li

fe

Fe

lizar

do

Rece

pta’

s Cas

e: N

etw

ork

Part

ners

hips

and

Str

ateg

y fo

r Su

rviv

e as

Bio

tech

Sta

rt-u

p Co

mpa

ny in

Bra

zil

Beck

er

Nano

tech

nolo

gy in

the

Mar

ketp

lace

: How

the

Nano

tech

nolo

gy In

dust

ry

View

s Risk

and

Reg

ulat

ion

Fole

y &

Wie

k Na

note

chno

logy

in

nova

tion:

gov

erna

nce

by u

rban

act

ors

Yout

ie &

Kay

Acq

uirin

g Na

note

chno

logy

Ca

pabi

litie

s: R

ole

of

Mer

gers

and

Ac

quisi

tions

in th

e Na

note

chno

logy

Ec

osys

tem

Flei

sche

r Go

vern

ance

of p

rodu

cts

cont

aini

ng

man

ufac

ture

d na

nopa

rticl

es -

Regu

lato

ry e

xpec

tatio

ns

of ci

tizen

s

Wec

kert

“I

f we

don’

t som

ebod

y el

se w

ill”

Kl

aess

ig

Nano

tech

nolo

gy D

efin

ition

s Ex

amin

ed fr

om th

e St

andp

oint

of

Cent

ral a

nd P

erip

hera

l Cla

im

Lang

uage

Use

d in

Inte

llect

ual

Prop

erty

Law

Moo

s An

Unc

erta

in B

usin

ess:

Se

lf-re

gula

tion

by th

e Br

itish

and

Dan

ish N

ano

Indu

strie

s

Bruc

e &

Wal

ker

Wha

t are

pub

lics t

hink

ing

abou

t hum

an

enha

ncem

ent?

Pla

ying

De

moc

s car

d ga

mes

in

the

WP7

ETH

ENTE

CH

Proj

ect

Del B

arco

& F

olad

ori

The

Boliv

ian

inno

vatio

n po

licy

rega

rdin

g th

e ex

ploi

tatio

n of

lith

ium

Ellio

t Th

emes

in U

.S. C

ivil

Socie

ty R

espo

nses

to

Nano

tech

nolo

gy

Van

der D

rift

Mor

alizi

ng

Tech

nolo

gies

and

Mor

al

de-S

killi

ng

15.0

0–15

.30

Co

ffee

brea

k. L

ocat

ion:

Rav

elijn

, dow

n in

hal

l

17

Wed

nesd

ay 2

4 O

ctob

er 2

012

15

.30–

17.0

0

Para

llel

sess

ions

Lo

catio

n:

Rave

lijn

S6A

Stra

nd 1

(N

ANO

)TEC

HNO

LOGI

CAL

EVO

LUTI

ON

Ch

air:

Wec

kert

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 15

01

S6B

Stra

nd 3

GO

VERN

ANCE

LES

SON

S Ch

air:

Reic

how

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

01

S5D

Stra

nd 3

ST

AKEH

OLD

ER

PART

ICIP

ATIO

N A

ND

ENGA

GEM

ENT

2 Ch

air:

Shel

ley-

Egan

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

02

S5E

Stra

nd 2

N

ATIO

NAL

CU

LTU

RES

OF

NAN

O IN

NO

VATI

ON

Ch

air:

Robi

nson

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

04

S6E

Stra

nd 6

RE

SPO

NSI

BLE

INN

OVA

TIO

N

Chai

r: va

n de

r Laa

n Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

04

S6F

Stra

nd 6

EM

ERGI

NG

TECH

NO

LOGI

ES A

ND

KN

OW

LEDG

E PO

LITI

CS

Chai

r: Co

zzen

s Ro

om: R

avel

ijn

Proj

ectr

oom

Beyh

an

Tran

sfer

of n

anot

echn

olog

ies

from

uni

vers

ities

to fi

rms:

Ev

iden

ce fr

om T

urke

y

Kuzm

a, K

okot

ovic

h &

Ku

zhab

ekov

a Hi

stor

y Re

peat

s Its

elf?

Go

vern

ance

of N

ew

Met

hods

for

Targ

eted

Gen

etic

Mod

ifica

tion

in th

e U.

S.

Bakk

er e

t al

Nano

tech

nolo

gy in

food

: pu

blic

conc

erns

, na

rrat

ives

and

as

sess

men

t nee

ds

Kloc

hikh

in &

Sha

pira

Gi

ants

in sm

all w

orld

s?

Inno

vatio

n an

d na

note

chno

logy

de

velo

pmen

t in

Chin

a an

d Ru

ssia

Barp

ujar

i In

cent

ivizi

ng In

nova

tion

and

Serv

ing

the

Publ

ic Go

od: E

xten

ding

the

Pate

nt R

egim

e to

Na

note

chno

logy

in

Indi

a

Bove

t & R

andl

es

Man

agin

g a

cont

rove

rsia

l te

chno

logy

in th

e ab

senc

e of

cont

rove

rsy:

th

e “i

n vi

tro”

po

litici

satio

n of

na

note

chno

logi

es

U

lnic

ane-

Ozo

lina

How

to e

xpla

in su

cces

sful

long

-te

rm in

tern

atio

nal r

esea

rch

colla

bora

tion

in n

ano

S&T

in

Euro

pe?

Coen

en, F

erra

ri Eu

rope

an g

over

nanc

e ac

tiviti

es o

n Hu

man

co

gniti

ve e

nhan

cem

ent

Åm

New

Mat

eria

ls in

Sol

ar

Cells

: Stu

dyin

g R&

D Pr

actic

es o

f Em

ergi

ng

Tech

nolo

gies

Sekh

saria

Th

e m

akin

g of

an

Indi

an

STM

& T

echn

olog

ical

juga

ad a

s a ‘C

ultu

re o

f In

nova

tion’

in In

dia

Cuijp

ers

Wha

t is t

he ro

le o

f an

STS

rese

arch

er o

n re

spon

sible

inno

vatio

n of

em

erge

nt

tech

nolo

gies

?

Van

der S

chee

r Tw

o ca

ses o

f pat

ient

in

volv

emen

t in

tran

slatio

nal m

olec

ular

m

edici

ne

Br

uyns

eels

In

nova

tions

in D

NA

sequ

encin

g te

chno

logi

es: T

he co

nver

genc

e of

te

chno

logi

es d

rives

a

conv

erge

nce

of co

ncep

tual

fr

amew

orks

Rugg

iu

The

Gove

rnan

ce o

f En

hanc

emen

t te

chno

logi

es a

nd th

e Ro

le

of E

thics

in E

urop

e: a

Hu

man

Rig

hts L

egal

Pe

rspe

ctiv

e

Corn

er, P

arkh

ill, P

idge

on

& V

augh

an

Publ

ic de

liber

atio

n ab

out

geoe

ngin

eerin

g:

resp

onsib

le in

nova

tion

and

desig

n

Said

i Tr

ansla

tion

from

la

bora

tory

to p

ract

ice:

The

Impl

icatio

ns o

f Na

note

chno

logy

Von

Scho

mbe

rg &

Gu

imar

aes P

erei

ra

Chal

leng

es o

f Re

spon

sible

Res

earc

h an

d In

nova

tion

at th

e Gl

obal

leve

l

17.0

0–17

.15

Br

eak,

wal

k to

Waa

ier

17.1

5–18

.15

Pl

enar

y le

ctur

e M

ICHA

EL G

ORM

AN &

DAA

N S

CHU

URB

IERS

Com

preh

ensiv

e Sc

ienc

e an

d Te

chno

logy

Eng

agem

ent L

ocat

ion:

Waa

ier 2

18

.30–

19.3

0

S.N

et B

usin

ess m

eetin

g

18

Thur

sday

25

Oct

ober

201

2

9.00

–10.

30

Para

llel s

essio

ns

Loca

tion:

Ra

velij

n

S7A

Stra

nd 6

EM

ERGI

NG

TECH

NO

LOGI

ES

AND

ETHI

CAL

GOVE

RNAN

CE

Chai

r: Bo

enin

k Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 15

01

S7B

Stra

nd 3

RE

GULA

TORY

AP

PRO

ACHE

S 1

Chai

r: Do

rbec

k-Ju

ng

Room

: Rav

elijn

RA

2501

S7C

Stra

nd 3

RE

GULA

TIO

N N

EW

TECH

NO

LOGI

ES

Chai

r: He

ldew

eg

Room

: Rav

elijn

RA

2502

S7D

Stra

nd 4

AR

GUM

ENTA

TIVE

PR

ACTI

CES

IN

TECH

NO

SCIE

NTI

FIC

CON

TRO

VERS

IES

Chai

r: Va

n Le

nte

Room

: Rav

elijn

RA

2503

S7E

Stra

nd 5

(IN

FORM

AL) P

UBL

IC

DIAL

OGU

E Ch

air:

Dort

man

s Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

04

G

rinba

um

Wha

t is “

Resp

onsib

le” a

bout

Re

spon

sible

Inno

vatio

n?

Boss

o Em

ergi

ng T

echn

olog

ies,

Inst

itutio

nal C

apac

ity,

and

the

Chal

leng

es o

f Go

vern

ance

in th

e 21

st

Cent

ury:

Les

sons

from

a

Deca

de o

f Na

note

chno

logy

Kica

& B

owm

an

Regu

latio

n by

mea

ns o

f st

anda

rdisa

tion:

Ke

y le

gitim

acy

issue

s of

heal

th a

nd sa

fety

na

note

chno

logy

st

anda

rds

Que

t Th

e in

fluen

ce o

f pr

omiss

ory

com

mun

icatio

n on

the

criti

que

of e

mer

ging

te

chno

logi

es

Seife

rt

Diffu

sion

and

Polic

y Le

arni

ng in

the

Nano

tech

-Fie

ld.

Mov

emen

t act

ors a

nd

publ

ic di

alog

ues i

n Gr

eat B

ritai

n, G

erm

any

and

Fran

ce

Pe

llizz

oni

Ethi

cal g

over

nanc

e an

d hu

man

na

ture

. So

me

prob

lem

s of t

he re

cent

de

bate

on

tech

no-s

cienc

e an

d (p

ost-

)hum

anity

Jasp

ers

Sile

nt D

iver

genc

e:

Nano

tech

nolo

gy P

olicy

in

the

Unite

d St

ates

and

Eu

rope

Guiv

ant

GMO

s in

Braz

il: th

e clo

sure

of t

he co

ntro

vers

y w

ith a

new

conf

igur

atio

n of

coal

ition

s and

deb

ates

Gel

fert

Ex

pert

s, Pr

edic

tions

, an

d Pr

omise

s: A

Pa

rado

x of

Te

chno

fidei

sm

Dijk

stra

Sc

ienc

e Ca

fés a

nd

scie

ntifi

c cit

izens

. The

Na

notr

ail p

roje

ct a

s a

case

M

alsc

h Em

ergi

ng T

echn

olog

ies a

nd

Peac

e

Dorb

eck-

Jung

& S

helle

y-Eg

an

Met

a-re

gula

tion

in th

e go

vern

ance

of t

he

resp

onsib

le d

evel

opm

ent

of n

anot

echn

olog

y:

oppo

rtun

ities

and

ch

alle

nges

Gol

tzPr

otec

ting

Child

ren

in th

e Af

term

ath

of B

row

n v.

En

t’ –

Empl

oyin

g Ne

w

Regu

lato

ry M

easu

res

Brey

To

p-Le

vel A

naly

sis o

f Em

ergi

ng T

echn

olog

ies

in A

ntici

pato

ry

Tech

nolo

gy E

thics

Dort

man

s As

sess

ing

info

rmal

pu

blic

dial

ogue

on

new

an

d em

ergi

ng sc

ienc

e an

d te

chno

logy

10.3

0–11

.00

Coffe

e br

eak.

Loc

atio

n: R

avel

ijn, d

own

in h

all

19

Thur

sday

25

Oct

ober

201

2

11.0

0–12

.00

Para

llel s

essio

ns

Loca

tion:

Ra

velij

n

S8A

Stra

nd 6

N

ANO

TECH

NO

LOGI

ES IN

CO

NTE

XT

Chai

r: Br

ey

Room

: Rav

elijn

RA

1501

S8B

Stra

nd 3

RE

GULA

TORY

AP

PRO

ACHE

S 2

Chai

r: St

okes

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

01

S8C

Stra

nd 3

RI

SK G

OVE

RNAN

CE A

ND

EXPE

RT IN

VOLV

EMEN

T Ch

air:

Kica

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

02

S8D

Stra

nd 4

TR

ACIN

G TR

ANSH

UM

AN

NAR

RATI

VES

Chai

r: Ge

lfert

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

03

S8E

Stra

nd 6

N

ANO

TECH

NO

LOGI

ES

AND

(INTE

R)N

ATIO

NAL

CO

NTE

XTS

Chai

r: Gu

ivan

t Ro

om: R

avel

ijn R

A 25

04

S8F

Stra

nd 4

AS

SESS

ING

AND

NEG

OTI

ATIO

N

EXPE

CTAT

ION

S Ch

air:

Te K

ulve

Ro

om: R

avel

ijn

Proj

ectr

oom

Mer

z & S

tras

snig

Th

e Lo

tus E

ffect

of R

esea

rch

Fund

ing:

Gov

erni

ng S

cienc

e on

Na

no R

isks

Reyn

olds

& F

leur

ke

Can

the

prec

autio

nary

pr

incip

le o

ffer g

uida

nce

for t

he re

gula

tion

of

clim

ate

engi

neer

ing

rese

arch

?

Beau

dri,

Kand

likar

, Sa

tter

field

, Her

r Har

thor

n Go

vern

ing

the

Unce

rtai

n: E

xper

t Ju

dgm

ent B

ased

Risk

Sc

reen

ing

for E

mer

ging

Na

note

chno

logi

es

Hort

on

Scal

ar E

rasu

re a

nd

Spec

ulat

ive

Med

ia: T

he

Nano

tech

nolo

gica

l Im

agin

atio

n Go

es

Plan

etar

y

Ku

The

Polit

ics o

f Nan

oELS

I in

the

U.S.

Robi

nson

, Del

emar

le,

Kaha

ne &

Lar

édo

Visio

n As

sess

men

t in

Asyn

chro

nous

Log

ic

Co

zzen

s, C

orte

s, H

arsc

h,

Soum

onni

, Wet

mor

e &

W

oods

on

Equi

ty, E

qual

ity, a

nd N

atio

nal

Cont

exts

: Th

e U.

S. a

nd S

outh

Afr

ica a

s En

viro

nmen

ts fo

r N

anot

echn

olog

ies

Held

eweg

Fo

ster

ing

Inno

vatio

n by

Re

gula

tory

Reg

ime

Desig

n: B

eyon

d In

diffe

renc

e

Deva

ney

Legi

timisi

ng (t

he) E

xper

ts:

Agen

cy R

egul

atio

n of

Em

ergi

ng B

iote

chno

logi

es

De la

Giro

day

Zom

bies

, bra

ins,

colla

psin

g bo

unda

ries,

and

enta

ngle

men

ts

Zaya

go L

au

Deve

lopm

enta

l Im

plica

tions

of

Nan

otec

hnol

ogie

s

Koko

tovi

ch &

Kuz

ma

Antic

ipat

ory

gove

rnan

ce a

nd

conf

lictin

g fu

ture

s:

Insig

hts f

rom

the

next

ge

nera

tion

of

gene

tic e

ngin

eerin

g

12.1

5-13

.15

Pl

enar

y le

ctur

e PI

ERRE

BEN

OIT

-JO

LY G

over

ning

Em

ergi

ng Te

chno

logi

es –

The

nee

d to

thin

k ou

t of t

he b

lack

box

Loca

tion:

Waa

ier 2

Cl

osin

g 13

.15

Take

Aw

ay L

unch

Waa

ier,

dow

n in

hal

l

20

OECD Workshop Workshop on aligning Policy, Practice and Research of Community Engagement on Nanotechnology The workshop will be hosted by the OECD Working Party on Nanotechnology (WPN) in cooperation with the S.NET 2012 committee, to be held at the University of Twente, the Netherlands, 23 October 2012. Preparation for participants (non-obligatory, but certainly helpful): * have read the OECD best practice engagement document * have developed a few best practice principles from their own field of expertise to bring to the workshop * have listed any success factors for engagement activities they have been involved in. Agenda The workshop will be run as an engagement activity itself, using different forms of public engagement methodologies to allow for multiple inputs and broad agreement on outcomes. Prior to the workshop participants should have read the OECD best practice engagement document. 1. Introduction and framing of the workshop. Outline the objectives of the workshop, what is achievable and what is not achievable. 2. Impediments to good engagement (Problems) Done in world cafe style, where people form into small groups to brainstorm issues of concern to them, and then jointly select the top five items to be shared with the whole group. Top five from each group are put onto a communal chart and are grouped into themes. 3. What to do about these impediments? (Activities/ Solutions) Forming into new groups people jointly discuss, but individually make suggestions as to what can be done to address the issues raised above. People suggest ideas to address issues raised above, that have been raised by somebody else, write them on post-it notes and stick them onto a charts around the room defined by theme. 4. Gap analysis (what does good engagement look like?/ Principles) Reforming into new groups, tables jointly discuss how well the existing OECD principles fit the solutions raised above, and what new points or clarifications need to be addressed to make them best fit? Or what do we need to do to fill the gaps? Use OECD principles as key headings. 5. Conclusions Summary of points raised and what has been learned and discussion with the group of what the next steps might be.

21

Program committee Marjolein van Asselt Technology and Society Studies, Maastricht University, the Netherlands and Scientific

Council for Government Policy (WRR), The Hague, the Netherlands Andrea Bandelli Department of Communication Science, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands Michael G. Bennett Northeastern University School of Law, USA Diana Bowman Risk Science Centre and Department of Health Management and Policy, School of

Public Health, the University of Michigan, USA and Faculty of Management and Governance, University of Twente, The Netherlands.

Suzan Cozzens School of Public Policy and Technology Policy and Assessment Center, Georgia

Institute of Technology, USA Arianna Ferrari Karlsruhe Institute of Technology/Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems

Analysis, Germany Julia Guivant Department of Sociology and Political Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina,

Brazil Barbara Herr Harthorn Department of Feminist Studies, Center for Nanotechnology in Society, University of

California, USA Ismael Rafols Science and Technology Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex and Ingenio, CSIC,

Universitat Politècnica València, Spain Arie Rip Science, Technology and Policy Studies, University of Twente, The Netherlands John Weckert Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia Fern Wickson GenØk Centre for Biosafety, Tromsø, Norway Jan Youtie School of Public Policy and Enterprise Innovation institute, Georgia Institute of

Technology, USA

22

Public engagement activities exhibition On Tuesday and Wednesday, a number of organizations will have a display in the hall of the Ravelijn building, exhibiting the public engagement activities they carried out. They will exhibit demos and materials used in their engagement activities, show audiovisual reports and/or display posters to highlight their work. From the Netherlands a number of organizations that took part in the societal dialogue on nanotechnology (Nanopodium) will present their work. In addition, several researchers from other countries will display materials used in engagement on other emerging technologies. If you are interested to consult their materials, learn from their experiences, and to get inspiration for your own activities: please come by during one of the breaks on Tuesday and Wednesday!

S.NET Nanolab tours This is a pre-conference event. If you are arriving early for the S.NET conference, we offer you the opportunity to get an inside view of a University of Twente nanotechnology lab, where technologies and their applications are actually emerging. As a pre-conference event, two lab tours are arranged. Lab tour 1: This lab is working on ground-breaking nanomedical developments (cells on a chip, nanosensors). Lab tour 2: This lab is studying the organization, dynamics and mechanical properties of proteins, also for biomedical purposes.

23

Local organizing committee

(Top row, from left to right) - Anne Dijkstra, Marcia Clifford, Kornelia Konrad (Bottom row, from left to right) - Evelien Rietberg, Marianne Boenink, Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung Marianne Boenink is an assistant professor at the Department of Philosophy at the University of Twente. She has a background in health sciences and philosophy. Her research interests mainly focus on philosophy and ethics of emerging biomedical technologies, including studies of genetic testing as well as population screening for breast cancer and of molecular diagnostics for Alzheimer’s Disease. Her work in these areas is driven by her interest in emerging visions and trends in medicine more generally, like for example the pleas for predictive, preventive and personalized medicine, the trend towards ongoing ‘molecularization’ of disease processes enabled by the convergence of biomedicine, nanotechnology and ICT, and the emerging hype of ‘translational research’ in medicine. In addition, she works on the use of techno-moral scenarios and vignettes as ways to broaden societal and ethical reflection on emerging technologies. m.boenink@utwente.nl Marcia Clifford is the secretary of the Institute for Innovation and Governance Studies (IGS) at the University of Twente. m.f.clifford@utwente.nl Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung is Professor of Regulation and Technology (with a focus on medical and nanotechnologies). She holds a Master’s degree in German law (University of München) and a Dutch PhD in Technical Sciences. She is a research Fellow of the University’s Institute for Governance Studies (IGS), a member of the Netherlands Institute of Government (NOB) and an associate member of the Ius Commune Research School. Additional functions include: Member of the Executive Board of the European Technology Platform Nanomedicine, chair of the Dutch and Flemish Association of Social Studies of Law, member of the Nanotechnology Commission of the Dutch Standardization Association (NEN), member Advisory Board Dutch Journal of Legal Philosophy and Legal Theory. Dorbeck-Jung worked and published on topics related to governance, legislation and self-regulation, good governance and the rule of law, computer law, health care law and technological regulation (IT and nanotechnologies). Currently she conducts empirical and theoretical studies on the effectiveness and legitimacy of medical technology and nanotechnology governance. Dorbeck-Jung is one of the project leaders of the Dutch NanoNext Programme Risk & Technology Assessment (funded by the Dutch Government). She participated in the IVAM University of Amsterdam project ‘Pilot Nano Reference

24

Values’. Dorbeck-Jung teaches bachelor and master courses on health law and medical technology regulation. b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Anne M. Dijkstra, PhD (University of Twente) is an assistant professor in Science Communication at the University of Twente, faculty of Behavioural Sciences. She studies the changing relationship between science, technology and society from a communication perspective. Her research focuses on scientific citizenship, public participation, science communication and risk governance regarding new technologies such as biotechnology, genomics, human enhancement and nanotechnology. She designed the master programme Science Communication of the newly accredited master Science Education and Communication and is coordinator of this programme. In 2008 she defended her PhD dissertation entitled ‘Of publics and science. How publics engage with biotechnology and genomics’. Prior to her academic work she worked as a project manager and senior communication advisor in the field of science and risk communication. As a volunteer she is organising public meetings for the Science Café Deventer (www.sciencecafedeventer.nl). In July 2012, she organized also the first, very successful science-art festival in Deventer which attracted 600 visitors (www.kopfestivaldeventer.nl). She is also involved in the children’s science café Zabuki (Nature, 2011). a.m.dijkstra@utwente.nl Kornelia Konrad is Assistant Professor of Dynamics and Assessment of Emerging Technologies at the University of Twente, NL, within the Department of Science, Technology, and Policy Studies (STePS). She is heading a group of PhD and postdoc projects investigating the societal embedding of nanotechnologies into society, focusing on promises and concerns, socio-technical scenarios, sectoral change and responsible innovation, funded by the Dutch national research program NanoNextNL. Her research interests relate to the role of anticipation in innovation processes, sustainable transitions and science-industry interactions. She holds a master’s degree in sociology, physics and mathematics from the University of Freiburg, and a PhD from the Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany. k.e.konrad@utwente.nl Evelien Rietberg is the secretary of the department of Science, Technology and Policy Studies at the University of Twente. e.rietberg@utwente.nl,

25

S.NET board members

As from 1 January 2012 onward President Davis Baird, Clark University Continuing members Diana Bowman, University of Melbourne Julia Guivant, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina David Guston, Arizona State University Kornelia Konrad, University of Twente Colin Milburn, University of California at Davis Rae Ostman, Sciencenter Ithaca Astrid Schwarz, Technical University Darmstadt Phil Shapira, University of Manchester John Weckert, Charles Sturt University Fern Wickson, University of Tromsø

26

List of participants

Last name First name Institute Country Email

Åm Heidrun NTNU Trondheim Norway Heidrun.aam@ntnu.no

Adamick Jessica University of Massachusetts Amherst

USA jadamick@library.umass.edu

Alvial Palavicino

Carla University of Twente The Netherlands c.alvialp@utwente.nl

Baird Davis Clark University USA dbaird@clarku.edu Banaiean-Mofrad

Ghazaleh Iran ghazaleh.banaiyan@gmail.com

Barpujari Indrani The Energy and Resources Institute India indrani@barpujari@teri.res.in

Barvosa Edwina CNS - UCSB USA jadamick@library.umass.edu

Beaudrie Christian University of British Columbia Canada christian.beaudrie@gmail.com

Becker Sean University of Wisconsin - Madison USA seanlouisbecker@gmail.com

Bennett Michael Northeastern University School of Law

USA m.bennett@neu.edu

Berube David North Carolina State University USA drdmberube@gmail.com

Beumer Koen Maastricht University The Netherlands k.beumer@maastrichtuniversity.nl

Beyhan Berna University of Gothenburg Sweden berna.beyhan@handels.gu.se

Bitsch Lise University of Twente The Netherlands lisebitsch343@gmail.com

Blank Dave University of Twente The Netherlands d.h.a.blank@utwente.nl

Boenink Marianne University of Twente The Netherlands m.boenink@utwente.nl

Bos Colette Utrecht University The Netherlands c.bos@uu.nl

Bosso Christopher Northeastern University USA c.bosso@neu.edu

Bowman Diana The Univ. of Michigan & University of Twente

USA Dibowman@umich.edu

Brey Philip University of Twente The Netherlands p.a.e.brey@utwente.nl

Bruce Donald Edinethics Ltd Scotland, UK info@edinethics.co.uk

Bruynseels Koen Delft University of Technology The Netherlands koen.bruynseels@gmail.com

Bukht Rumana The University of Manchester UK Lisa.Gledhill@manchester.ac.uk

Cao Cong University of Nottingham UK cong.cao@nottingham.ac.uk

Clifford Marcia University of Twente The Netherlands m.f.clifford@utwente.nl

Coenen Christopher Karlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT-ITAS

Germany christopher.coenen@kit.edu

Collins Mary University of California USA mcollins@bren.ucsb.edu

Cormick Craig Australian Department of Innovation

Australia craig.cormick@innovation.gov.au

Corner Adam Cardiff University UK corneraj@cardiff.ac.uk

Cortes Rodrigo Universidad de Talca Chile rcortes@gatech.edu

Cozzens Susan Georgia Institute of Technology USA scozzens@gatech.edu

Cuijpers Yvonne Utrecht University The Netherlands y.m.cuijpers@uu.nl

de Bakker Erik LEI (Agricultural Economics Institute)

The Netherlands erik.debakker@wur.nl

de la Giroday Maryse Canada nano@frogheart.ca

Delemarle Aurelie Univ Paris Est - ESIEE Paris France a.delemarle@esie.fr

Devaney Sarah University of Manchester UK sarah.devaney@manchester.ac.uk

Dijkman Anja TNO The Netherlands anja.dijkman@tno.nl

Dijkstra Anne University of Twente The Netherlands a.m.dijkstra@utwente.nl

27

Doorn Neelke Delft University of Technology The Netherlands N.Doorn@tudelft.nl

Doridot Fernand CETS (Centre for Ethics, Technics and Society)

France fernand.doridot@icam.fr

Dorbeck-Jung Bärbel University of Twente The Netherlands b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl

Dortmans Koen Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands k.dortmans@science.ru.nl

Eardley-Pryor Roger University of California Santa Barbara

USA pryorrw@umail.ucsb.edu

Efstathiou Sophia Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Norway sophia.efstathiou@ntnu.no

Elliott Kevin University of South Carolina USA ke@sc.edu

Engeman Cassandra University of California USA engeman@cns.ucsb.edu

Felizardo Rafael University of Sao Paolo Brazil rafael.felizardo@usp.br

Felt Ulrike University of Vienna Austria ulrike.felt@univie.ac.at

Fermont Jilles University of Twente Netherlands mail@fermontresearch.com

Fleischer Torsten Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)

Germany Torsten.Fleischer@kit.edu

Foladori Guillermo Autonomous University of Zacatecas

Mexico 12foladori@gmail.com

Foley Rider Arizona State University USA rider.foley@gmail.com

Fonseca Paulo University of Coimbra Portugal paulofonseca@ces.uc.pt

Forsberg Ellen-Marie Oslo and Akershus University College

Norway Ellenmarie.Forsberg@hioa.no

Friedman Itamar University of South Carolina USA itabar84@gmail.com

Gebbie Matthew University of California USA magebbie@gmail.com

Gelfert Axel National University of Singapore Singapore phigah@nus.edu.sg

Gholami Mahtab Msc graduated student Iran mahtab_gholami2885@yahoo.com

Goltz Nachshon York University Canada n.goltz@gmail.com

Grinbaum Alexei CEA-Saclay/LARSIM France alexei.grinbaum@cea.fr

Grobe Antje University of Stuttgart Germany antje.grobe@sowi.uni-stuttgart.de

Groves Chris Cardiff University UK grovesc1@cf.ac.uk

Guimarães Pereira

Ângela European Commission - Joint Research Centre

Italy angela.pereira@jrc.ec.europa.eu

Guivant Julia S. Federal University of Santa Catarina Brazil juliaguivant@gmail.com

Han Xueying (Shirley)

University of California USA shirley.han@lifesci.ucsb.edu

Harthorn Barbara University of California USA harthorn@cns.ucsb.edu

Heldeweg Michiel University of Twente The Netherlands m.a.heldeweg@utwente.nl

Herring Brad Museum of Life and Science USA bradh@ncmls.org

Hoes Anne-Charlotte

Lei, Wageningen UR The Netherlands anne-charlotte.hoes@wur.nl

Horton Zachary University of California USA zhorton@umail.ucsb.edu

Invernizzi Noela Federal University of Parana Brasil noela.invernizzi@gmail.com

Benoit-Joly Pierre INRA France joly@ivry.inra.fr

Kay Luciano University of California USA luciano@cns.ucsb.edu

Keys Cameron Arizona State University USA cameron.keys@asu.edu

Kica Evisa University of Twente Netherlands e.kica@utwente.nl

Kitisriworaphan Thanate Bangkok Thonburi University Thailand nanosoctk@gmail.com

Klaessig Frederick Pennsylvania Bio Nano Systems, LLC

USA fred.klaessig@verizon.net

Klochikhin Evgeny Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR)

UK Lisa.Gledhill@manchester.ac.uk

Kokotovich Adam University of Minnesota USA koko0013@umn.edu

28

Koksma Jur UMCN The Netherlands J.Koksma@iwoo.umcn.nl

Konrad Kornelia University of Twente The Netherlands k.e.konrad@utwente.nl

Ku Sharon University of Southern Indiana USA sharonku0401@gmail.com

Kuzma Jennifer University of Minnesota-USA USA kuzma007@umn.edu

Lamprou Anna Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute USA lampra@rpi.edu

Larédo Philippe Univ. Paris Est (IFRIS) & Univ. of Manchester (MIoIR)

France Philippe.laredo@enpc.fr

Lisotti Annamaria University of Modena and Reggio E. Italy annamaria.lisotti@unimore.it

Loeber Anne University of Amsterdam The Netherlands a.m.c.loeber@uva.nl

Luschen Ria University of Twente The Netherlands h.j.luschen@utwente.nl

Mahootian Farzad New York University USA fm57@nyu.edu

Malsch Ineke Malsch TechnoValuation The Netherlands postbus@malsch.demon.nl

Marschalek Ilse Centre for Social Innovation Austria marschalek@zsi.at

Mehta Aashish University of California-Santa Barbara

USA mehta@global.ucsb.edu

Merz Martina University of Lucerne Switzerland martina.merz@unilu.ch

Milburn Colin University of California, Davis USA cnmilburn@ucdavis.edu

Mohebbi Sajjad University of Kurdistan Iran sajadmohebi@yahoo.com

Mooney Pat ETC Group mooney@etcgroup.org

Moos Pelle European University Institute Italy pelle.moos@eui.eu

Moors Ellen Copernicus Institute The Netherlands e.h.m.moors@uu.nl

Mout Jacqueline Ministry of Education, Culture and Science

The Netherlands j.n.mout@minocw.nl

Neresini Federico University of Padua Italy federico.neresini@unipd.it

Neven Louis Utrecht University The Netherlands L.B.M.Neven@uu.nl

Nordmann Alfred University Darmstadt Germany nordmann@phil.tu-darmstadt.de

Nydal Rune Norwegian University of science and technology

Norway rune.nydal@ntnu.no

Ostman Rae Sciencenter USA rostman@sciencenter.org

Pellizzoni Luigi University of Trieste Italy pellizzonil@sp.units.it

Pierce Robin Delft University of Technology The Netherlands r.l.pierce@tudelft.nl

Quet Mathieu IRD-IFRIS France mathieu.quet@gmail.com

Rafols Ismael University of Sussex Spain i.rafols@ingenio.upv.es

Randles Sally The University of Manchester UK Lisa.Gledhill@manchester.ac.uk

Reichow Aline University of Twente The Netherlands a.reichow@utwente.nl

Reynolds Jesse University of Tilburg The Netherlands j.l.reynolds@uvt.nl

Rezazadeh Yazdan CHEMICAL Iran Y.R@LNPchemical.COM

Rieder Gernot University of Vienna Austria gernot.rieder@univie.ac.at

Rietberg Evelien University of Twente The Netherlands e.rietberg@utwente.nl

Rip Arie University of Twente The Netherlands a.rip@utwente.nl

Robinson Douglas teQnode Limited France douglas.robinson@teqnode.com

Rommetveit Kjetil Rommetveit

University of Bergen Norway kjetil.rommetveit@svt.uib.no

Roure Francoice Ministry Economy Finance France yannick.guillaumot@finances.gouv.fr

Ruivenkamp Martin Radboud University The Netherlands m.ruivenkamp@science.ru.nl

Ruggiu Daniele University of Padova Italy daniele.ruggiu@unipd.it

Saidi Trust Maastricht University Zimbabwe tsaidi@student.maastrichtuniversity.nl

van der Scheer Lieke University of Twente The Netherlands Lieke.vanderScheer@utwente.nl

Schumann Simone University of Vienna Austria s.schumann@aon.at

29

Schuurbiers Daan De Proeffabriek The Netherlands daan@proeffabriek.nl

Schwarz Claudia University of Vienna Austria claudia.g.schwarz@gmail.com

Schwarz Astrid Friedrich Schiller University Jena Germany schwarz@phil.tu-darmstadt.de

Seifert Franz University Vienna Austria fseifert@gmx.at

Sekhsaria Pankaj Maastricht University The Netherlands psekhsaria@gmail.com

Shapira Philip The University of Manchester UK Lisa.Gledhill@manchester.ac.uk

Shelley-Egan Clare University of Twente The Netherlands c.shelleyegan@utwente.nl

Simakova Elena University Of Exeter Business School

England j.belcher@exeter.ac.uk

Simon Denis Arizona State University USA chinaprc@aol.com

Smith Robert Univerisity of Nottingham UK stxrdjs@nottingham.ac.uk

Spruit Shannon Delft University of Technology The Netherlands s.l.spruit@tudelft.nl

Stemerding Dirk Rathenau Instituut The Netherlands d.stemerding@rathenau.nl

Stocking Galen University of California Santa Barbara

USA gstocking@umail.ucsb.edu

Strand Roger University of Bergen Norway roger.strand@svt.uib.no

Swierstra Tsjalling Maastricht University The Netherlands t.swierstra@maastricht.net

Te Kulve Haico University of Twente The Netherlands h.tekulve@utwente.nl

Throne-Holst Harald SIFO - National institute for consumer research

Norway harald.throne-holst@sifo.no

Tokamanis Christos European Commission Belgium Christos.tokamanis@ec.europa.eu

Ulnicane Inga University of Twente the Netherlands i.ulnicane-ozolina@utwente.nl

Vaage Nora University of Bergen Norway nora.vaage@svt.uib.no

van de Poel Ibo Tu Delft, TBM, Philosophy The Netherlands i.r.vandepoel@tudelft.nl

van der Drift Mijke Maastricht University The Netherlands mijke.vanderdrift@maastrichtuniversity.nl

van Lente Harro Utrecht University The Netherlands h.vanlente@uu.nl

van Mensvoort Koert Next Nature Network The Netherlands mensvoort@nextnature.net

Veldman-Klos Annelies University of Twente The Netherlands a.veldman-klos

Villa Vazquez Laura Liliana

Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas

Mexico laura_lilianavilla@yahoo.com.mx

von Schomberg Rene European Commission Belgium rene.vonschomberg@hotmail.com

Walhout Bart University of Twente The Netherlands a.m.walhout@utwente.nl

Wang Lili Maastricht University The Netherlands wang@merit.unu.edu

Weckert John Charles Sturt University Australia jweckert@csu.edu.au

Wetmore Jameson Arizona State University USA Jameson.Wetmore@asu.edu

Wickson Fern GenØk Centre for Biosafety Norway fern.wickson@genok.org

Youtie Jan Georgia Institute of Technology USA jan.youtie@innovate.gatech.edu

Zayago Lau Edgar Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas

Mexico zayagolau@gmail.com

30

Rest

aura

nt su

gges

tions

Ensc

hede

31

Heng

elo

32

Map

Cam

pus U

nive

rsity

of T

wen

te

University of TwenteInstitute for Innovation and Governance StudiesDrienerlolaan 57522 NB EnschedeThe Netherlands

P.O. Box 2177500 AE EnschedeThe Netherlands

P +31 (0)53 489 3423F +31 (0)53 489 2159 info@igs.utwente.nl

www.utwente.nl/igs

INSTITUTE FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY

MESA+INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION AND GOVERNANCE STUDIES

IGS