Upload
gary-porter
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Prognostic Utility of Secretory Phospholipase A2 in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease
M. O'Donoghue, Z. Mallat, D.A. Morrow, J. Benessiano, S. Sloan, T. Omland, S.D. Solomon, E. Braunwald, A. Tedgui, and M.S. Sabatine
http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/full/57/9/1311
October 2011
© Copyright 2011 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
IntroductionIntroduction
The secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) family consists of 10 isoenzymes involved in a variety of biological processes
Growing evidence suggests sPLA2 may play a causal role in atherogenesis
sPLA2-X promotes macrophage foam cell formation in murine models
Up-regulated sPLA2-IIA or –V expression has been shown to increase atherosclerotic lesion size in transgenic mice
Genetic deletion of sPLA2–V or direct inhibition of sPLA2 activity reduces atherosclerotic lesion size in animals
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
IntroductionIntroduction
To date, a small number of studies have evaluated the utility of sPLA2 mass or activity for risk stratification in primary prevention and after an acute coronary syndrome
The prognostic utility of sPLA2 is not well established in a large population of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD)
We therefore evaluated the prognostic utility of sPLA2 in the PEACE trial, a large trial population of patients with stable CAD
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
QuestionsQuestions
Is sPLA2 useful for risk stratification in patients with stable CAD?
If yes, does it add any incremental value to established markers including high sensitivity troponin T, C-reative protein (hsCRP), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), and NT- pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)?
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
MethodsMethods
sPLA2 activity (Aterovax) was measured at baseline in 3708 subjects
Median follow-up was 4.8 years
Cox regression models were used to adjust for baseline differences, apoB, apoA1, and medications
The incremental value of sPLA2 was evaluated compared to established markers, including high sensitivity troponin T (Roche), Lp-PLA2 mass (diaDexus), NT-proBNP (Roche), and hsCRP (Denka Seiken)
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
Baseline characteristics by quartile of Baseline characteristics by quartile of sPLAsPLA22 activity activity
Table 1. Baseline characteristics by quartile of sPLA activity (U/mL).a 2
Quartile 1, Quartile 2, Quartile 3, Quartile 4,
Characteristic <18.4 U/mL 18.5–30.9 U/mL 31.0–45.7 U/mL >45.7 U/mL P value
n 928 926 927 927
Age, years 64 (8.3) 64 (8.4) 64 (8.2) 64 (7.9) 0.18
Female sex 13.3 13.5 19.7 29.3 < 0.001
M edical history
Hypertension 40.2 44.8 44.9 48.4 0.005
Diabetes mellitus 14.8 13.3 16.0 21.0 < 0.001
Current tobacco use 12.8 14.2 15.8 17.6 0.02
Prior MI 53.3 56.5 57.7 57.6 0.18
Prior PCI or coronary artery bypass graft surgery 80.0 75.5 70.33 64.36 < 0.001
M edications before randomization
Aspirin or antiplatelet drug 91.0 92.0 90.5 91.5 0.68
Beta-blocker 61.2 60.0 61.7 65.3 0.11
Lipid-lowering medication 75.3 72.0 71.6 67.8 0.002
Data at randomization
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 132 (16) 133 (16) 134 (17) 135 (18) < 0.001
eGFR 80 (20) 77 (18) 79 (20) 76 (20) < 0.001
Body mass index, kg/m2 28 (4.3) 28 (4.5) 29 (4.8) 29 (5.2) 0.001
ApoB, mg/dL 102 (22) 105 (22) 110 (23) 112 (23) < 0.001
ApoA1, mg/dL 136 (22) 137 (23) 140 (25) 140 (27) 0.002
Cardiac troponin T, f.Lg/L 7.1 (5.7) 7.8 (7.2) 7.4 (5.9) 8.0 (6.5) 0.005
C-reactive protein, mg/L 2.2 (3.3) 2.4 (3.6) 3.3 (5.6) 5.5 (8.8) < 0.001
Lp-PLA2 mass, ng/mL 226 (68) 230 (74) 228 (73) 237 (74) 0.002
NT-proBNP, pg/mL 225 (294) 221 (274) 255 (373) 278 (384) 0.001
a Data are mean (SD) or % .
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
Kaplan-Meier event rates & hazard ratios by Kaplan-Meier event rates & hazard ratios by quartile of sPLAquartile of sPLA22 activity activity
Table 2. Multivariable model: age, sex, tobacco use (current, former, never), eGFR, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, apoB, apoA1, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, lipid-lowering therapy, history of coronary revascularization, randomized treatment arm.
Kaplan-Meier event rate by quartiles of sPLA2
activity at 5 years
Outcome
n
<18.4 U/mL
18.5–30.9
U/mL
31.0–45.6
U/mL >45.7 U/mL
Unadjusted HR (95% CI), Q4:Q1
Adjusted HR
(95% CI), Q4:Q1a
928 926 927 927 Cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke 7.84 9.20 10.2 13.2 1.78 (1.32–2.40) 1.55 (1.13–2.14)
Cardiovascular death or HF 3.26 5.05 5.52 7.93 2.25 (1.47–3.46) 1.91 (1.20–3.03)
Cardiovascular death 2.51 2.71 3.19 4.88 2.00 (1.18–3.37) 1.66 (0.95–2.88)
MI 4.54 4.70 6.59 7.00 1.63 (1.09–2.44) 1.49 (0.96–2.32)
Stroke 1.26 1.92 1.20 2.55 2.10 (1.01–4.38) 1.59 (0.74–3.41)
HF 1.22 2.43 2.84 3.98 2.73 (1.38–5.38) 2.63 (1.19–5.80)
Coronary revascularization 20.7 16.7 20.3 23.1 1.09 (0.89–1.33) 1.03 (0.83–1.27)
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
Cumulative incidence of CV death, MI or Cumulative incidence of CV death, MI or stroke by quartile of sPLAstroke by quartile of sPLA22 activity activity
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
Cumulative incidence of CV death or heart Cumulative incidence of CV death or heart failure by quartile of sPLAfailure by quartile of sPLA22 activity activity
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
Multimarker analysis for sPLAMultimarker analysis for sPLA22, Lp-PLA, Lp-PLA22
mass, hsCRP and risk of CV death, MI or mass, hsCRP and risk of CV death, MI or strokestroke
CV death, MI or stroke
sPLA2 activity
Lp-PLA2 mass
hsCRP
1.47 (1.06-2.04)
1.35 (0.97-1.88)
1.25 (0.91-1.73)
Adj HR Q4:Q1 (95% CI)
2.0 5.0 10.01.00.50.20.1
Figure 3. The independent association between sPLA2 activity, Lp-PLA2 mass, hsCRP, and the risk of cardiovascular death, MI or stroke. MV model includes the 3 biomarkers by quartile, age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, history of coronary revascularization, history of lipid-lowering therapy, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, eGFR, apoB, apoA1, and randomized treatment arm.
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
Figure 4. The independent association between sPLA2 activity, NT-proBNP, and cardiac troponin T and the risk of cardiovascular death or HF. MV model includes the 3 biomarkers by quartile, age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, history of coronary revascularization, history of lipid-lowering therapy, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, eGFR, apoB, apoA1, and randomized treatment arm.
Multimarker analysis for sPLAMultimarker analysis for sPLA22, NT-proBNP , NT-proBNP
and troponin T and risk of CV death or HFand troponin T and risk of CV death or HF
CV death or HF
sPLA2 activity
NT-proBNP
hsTroponin T
1.79 (1.12-2.86)
5.39 (2.88-10.1)
3.39 (1.81-6.32)
Adj HR Q4:Q1 (95% CI)
2.0 5.0 10.00.50.20.1 1.0
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
Multimarker Results (cont’d)Multimarker Results (cont’d)
In ROC analysis, sPLA2 activity significantly improved the AUC for identifying patients at risk of CV death, MI or stroke compared with clinical risk factors alone (P=0.01). Lp-PLA2 and hsCRP did not improve the AUC
sPLA2, NT-proBNP and troponin T all significantly improved the AUC as compared with clinical risk factors alone for identifying patients at risk of CV death or heart failure (P=0.02, P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively)
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
ConclusionsConclusions
sPLA2 activity provides independent prognostic information beyond established clinical risk factors in patients with stable CAD
sPLA2 activity also provides incremental information for risk stratification independent of established markers including hsCRP, troponin T, Lp-PLA2 mass and NT-proBNP
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
QuestionsQuestions
Would routine measurement of sPLA2 activity help to improve outcomes in patients with stable CAD? Would it help to guide treatment decisions?
If sPLA2 is causal in the pathway for atherogenesis, will direct inhibition of the sPLA2 enzyme with the
novel drug varespladib reduce the risk of CV events?
© Copyright 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry
Thank you for participating in this month’sClinical Chemistry Journal Club.
Additional Journal Clubs are available atwww.clinchem.org
Follow us on