Upload
blaise
View
34
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Integrated water resources management - basin approach at the rivers Danube, Tisza and Sava in accordance to EU Water Framework Directive. Prof Jovan Despotović 1 , Marko Pavlović 2 MSc 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Civil Engineering 2 Republic Hydrometeo Service of Serbia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Integrated water resources management - basin approach at the
rivers Danube, Tisza and Sava in accordance to EU Water Framework Directive
Prof Jovan Despotović1, Marko Pavlović2 MSc
1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Civil Engineering2 Republic Hydrometeo Service of Serbia
Belgrade, Novi Sad, March 2012
Legal instrument for co-operation and an integrated transboundary water resourses management
In December 2004, representatives of the five Tisza countries under ICPDR umbrella signed the
Memorandum of Understanding after which Tisza Group was established.
In 2001 four former Republics in SFR Yugoslavia entered the process of negotiations which led to creation of the
Framework Agreement for the Sava River Basin (FASRB) and establishment of the ISRBC.
In June 1994 nine Contracting Parties signed Convention on Cooperation for the Protection and Sustainable Use of Danube River (DRPC) that led to establishment of the
ICPDR.
On the 14th of December 2009 the first integrated basin management plan for the Danube river was officially approved by the
Contracting Parties
Plan for the Tisza River Basin was introduced to the ICPDR representatives in December 2010
Final draft version of the Sava River Basin Plan is currently in the phase of public participation
which will last till 21 April 2012
Integrated River Basin Management Plans
increase the risk of
Integrated water management schemebased on TRB but proposed for the SRB
Industrial activities
Urban development
Renewable Energy Directive
(Common) Agricultural Policy
Environmental Protection Policies
Measures under the WFD
Land use management
Climate
changeScarcity and
droughts
Organic pollution
N/P/pest. pollution
Priority substances
Hydro-morphological alterations
Navigation
Qualitative status
Quantitative status
Overall status of a water
body
defines
influences
define
influences
impact
defines release of
results in
Infrastructure, structures, traffic
Legend
SWMI
Policy areas Water status
Natural/human events
Floods Sediment FIP
define
Water Demands
Hydro Peaking
Floods DirectiveNavigation Directive
Protocol on the Navigation Regime
Protocol on Flood Protection
Protocol on Sediment Management
Diffuse pollution
Tourism
Danube Basin Analysis Report enabled the identification of the four SWMIs of a basin wide importance:
• Organic • Nutrient
• Hazardous substances pollution • Hydromorphological alterations
Tisza Analysis Report presented additional issues regarding groundwater, water scarcity, droughts and
floods
As added value, final draft of the SRBMP included special chapter related to the integration of water protection with
other developments in the basin
Significant Water Management Issues
Key findings
Organic pollution in the DRB is mainly caused by the emission of partially treated
or untreated wastewater from agglomerations, industry and agriculture.
Nutrient pollution comprehends mainly pollution from phosphorus and nitrogen
input.
Point and diffuse source discharges are to be distinguished.
The shares of pollution for the DRB from settlements in represent 27 % and 53 %
for N and P respectively.
Portion of agriculture for DRB is 39 % for N and 32 % for P.
The most dominant pathway from diffuse pollution into the surface water for nitrogen
is groundwater and for phosphorus it is erosion.
Key findings DRB
Main source of nutrient pollution in the TRB is agriculture with 49% of N and 21 % of P followed by 30% of N and70% of P originating from urban sources.
Key findings TRB
Source: Tisza River Basin Analysis Report, 2007
Key findings SRB
Nutrient pollution sources in the Sava river basin
Discharged Nt
t/a Discharged Pt
t/aUrban (agglomerations) sources
11,112 2,642
Industrial point sources (estimation)1,872 182
A.3 Point pollution sources from agriculture 32,400 3,784
Diffused pollution sources (risk assessment) 34,198 3,932
Sava RB Total (ref. year 2007) 79,582 10,540
MONERIS (ref. year 2004 -2005)114,000 8 ,900
Sava River nutrient balance38,000 – 85,000 1,800 – 6,900
Source: Final draft version 6.2 of the Sava River Basin Management Plan, 2011
A list of relevant hazardous substances was prepared by ICPDR.
In total 33 priority and 8 additional substances were identified with the
Danube Basin wide importance.
Same approach is used for the Tisza and the Sava Basin.
Key findings
• Three key hydromorphological pressure components of Danube basin-wide importance are identified:
• Interruption of river and habitat continuity• Disconnection of adjacent wetlands/floodplains
• Hydrological alterations
Key driving forces in hydromorphological pressure causing river and habitat continuity interruption in the Tisza river basin are mainly water supply and flood protection
The key driving forces causing hydromophological alterations in the Sava river basin are primarily
hydropower, water supply and flood protection
Key findings
Thank you for attention!