23
The Swiss Political System An Introduction First Part Presentation at the Federal Institute of Technol Lausanne, Oct. 21, 2010 Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern [email protected]

Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern [email protected]

  • Upload
    mead

  • View
    23

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Swiss Political System An Introduction First Part Presentation at the Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, Oct. 21, 2010 . Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern [email protected]. Contents. Part I (Oct. 21) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

The Swiss Political SystemAn IntroductionFirst Part

Presentation at the Federal Institute of TechnologyLausanne, Oct. 21, 2010

Prof. em. Wolf LinderInstitute of Political ScienceUniversity of [email protected]

Page 2: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

2

> Part I (Oct. 21)> Origins of the Swiss Federation 1815-1848> Federalism> The Parliament and the Executive> Part II (Nov. 4)> Direct Democracy> Power Sharing> A comparative perspective

Contents

Page 3: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

> Origins of the Swiss Federation

1815-1848

3

Page 4: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

4

History: The fight for democracy and federalism 1815-1848: not so peaceful

>1815: No common state. Reestablishment of authoritarian governments in the Cantons>After 1830: Democratic move- ments in protestant cantons>Riots in parts of Switzerland>1844: Aargau prohibits Catholic monasteries / Lucerne calls ultra- conservative Jesuit monks.>1845: Irregular troops from Aargau attack Lucerne twice

Assembly demanding more democracy in Uster 1830

Page 5: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

5

Unrest after 1830

Army troops putting down insurgent movements of the rural population in Basel 1831 (left) and Zurich 1839 (right)In Basel, the people were fighting against a conservative, in Zurich against a liberal government

Page 6: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

6

1845 Alliance of 7 Catholic Cantons „Sonderbund“ as reaction to liberal movement

Page 7: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

7

The „Sonderbund“ War

>20 July 1847: The „Tagsatzung“ decides that the Catholic Alliance must be dissolved. The Catholic Cantons reject the decision.>4 November 1847: The Liberal majority decides to go to war. General Dufour declares that the enemy should be treated with humanity>After 20 days, the Catholics are defeated at Gislikon near Lucerne>100 death and 500 wounded.

Page 8: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

8

The Federal Constitution of 1848

> A political compromise between the protagonists of a central state and the opposition who did not want a central state at all. Only few competencies for the Federal Government

> Bi-cameral parliament and collective leadership in the Executive

> Federalism: A bottom-up approach to governance> Semi-direct Democracy: Referendum for constitutional

amendments> Main reasons for the creation of the Federation:

— National independence— Economy

Page 9: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

Swiss Federalism:

A State conceived bottom-up

9

Page 10: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

10

Citizenship and the three levels of the federal system

LEVEL CITIZENSHIP

1 nation (3) federal 26 cantons (2) cantonal2600 communes (1) communal

Page 11: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

11

The Cantons

>Have power to organise themselves (constitutions)>Have parliaments, governments and courts>Implement their own but also most of federal laws>Are financially strong (40% of tax revenue / spending)

Page 12: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

12

The Communes

>Have limited power to organize themselves>Have government and parliament or citizens assembly (depending on size) >Possess (judicially protected) autonomy regarding their own laws >Are financially strong (30% of tax revenue / spending)

Page 13: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

Powers and politics in Swiss federalism

> Bottom-up state: all powers belong to the communes and the cantons, unless

> A (new) competency is conferred to the federation by constitutional amendment (vote of the people and the cantons)

> The cantons participate in the decision-making of the central state (bi-cameral parliament, double majority of cantons and the people in constitutional amendment)

> Consequences:— Strong position of the Cantons, central government “weak”— A strongly decentralised state, living up to the principle of

“subsidiarity”

13

Page 14: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

14

Who is doing what? A portfolio of shared responsibilities

Federation Cantons Communes

Schools (x) X XHealth (x) X XPolice (x) X XMoney XArmy XRoads X X XForeign Policy XSocial security X (x) (x)Welfare X XTaxation X X X

Page 15: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

Strong federalism: Why?

> History 1848: The federal state as a compromise between cantons “pro” and “against” a central state

> Multi-cultural society: Strong divides between— Catholics and Protestants— Industrialised and rural cantons— Four linguistic regions (German, French, Italian, Romansh)

> Federalism gives utmost autonomy to the cantons, protecting minorities and the diversity of their cultures

> Modern meanings:— Efficiency (small bureaucracy, low taxes)— The cantons as laboratory of policy innovation (try and error)— A State close to the people: Why federalism makes the Swiss happy— Some “buts”….

15

Page 16: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

The authorities of the Federation:Parliament and the Executive

16

Page 17: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

17

Parliament I: The National CouncilThe representation of the People

>200 members (part-time)>Seats distributed among cantons according to population>Elections (every 4 years) since 1918: based on principle of proportionality>Speaker: Rotates every year among main parties

Page 18: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

18

Parliament II: The Council of StateThe representation of the Cantons

>46 members (part-time)>Two representatives per canton>Elected every 4 years according to system determined by canton>Equal weight and competencies as National Council

Page 19: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

19

The Executive: The Federal Council

>7 members (Ministers)>Elected by Federal Assembly for 4 years>Rotating Presidency (each year)>Speaks with one voice (principle of collegiality)>Each member is head

of one ministry

Page 20: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

20

Switzerland’s “All Party Government”:Composition of the Federal Council

Political Parties(1959 – 2010)

Radicals (Liberals) 2Social Democrats 2Christian Democrats 1 (2 until 2003)Swiss People‘s Party 2 (1 until 2003)

Languages German speaking 4 – 5French/Italian speaking 2 – 3

Religion Catholics at least 2Protestant not more than 5

Gender 2010 majority of 4 women

Page 21: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

Reasons for, and the functioning of the governmental „Grand Coalition“

> From a one-party government to proportional representation: a historical process of co-optation and integration

> Direct democracy: Referenda allow opposition groups to veto governmental politics. This forces the political parties to co-operate in a grand coalition.

> The „formula“ of the grand coalition: proportional representation (party, language, gender)

> Mode of functioning: negotiation and compromise> No „big change“ between government and opposition parties, but

different issue-wise coalitions amongst the members of government (and parliamentary factions)

> Effect: political stability, slow innovation, high integration> Crisis of the Grand Coalition and the politics of compromise?

21

Page 22: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

Next time

> Direct democracy> Power sharing> Comparative perspectives> And for those who want to learn more:

Wolf Linder, Swiss DemocracyPalgrave MacmillanHoundmills, BasingstrokeISBN 9 780230 231893

22

Page 23: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch

23

Thank you