Upload
vicky
View
75
Download
7
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Optical Wireless Communications. Prof. Brandt-Pearce Lecture 8 Deep-Space Optical Communications. Outline. Deep-Space Optical Communications Introduction Channel Model System Performance Optical Deep-Space Network RF/FSO Hybrid System. Deep-Space Communications. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Prof. Brandt-Pearce
Lecture 8Deep-Space Optical
Communications
Optical Wireless Communications
2
Outline
Deep-Space Optical Communications Introduction
Channel Model
System Performance
Optical Deep-Space Network
RF/FSO Hybrid System
3
4
Sending and receiving data from space crafts has been a
challenging problem since 1950s
Communication over deep-space distances is extremely
difficult, much more difficult than satellite communications
Communications beams spread as the square of the distance
between the transmitter and the receiver
Deep-Space Communications
5
The distance from Earth to Neptune or Pluto can be on the
order of 4,000,000,000 km. After propagating over such a
distance, the communications beam from a spacecraft will
spread to an area 10 billion times (100 dB) larger in area than
if the beam from the same system traveled from just the GEO
distance (40,000 km).
A system capable of transmitting 10 Gbps from GEO to the
ground would only achieve 1 bps from Pluto/Neptune
distances.
Deep-Space Optical Communications
6
Optical communications has lower divergence compared to RF
Comparison of RF and optical beam spreads from Saturn.
Deep-Space Optical Communications
7
An important factor for a high data-rate deep-space optical link is the laser transmitter
Lasers are required to have High output power Low divergence
Deep-Space Optical Communications
8
Another key technology component is a thermally stable and lightweight optical spacecraft telescope.
Similar to satellite communications, for a small beam divergence, tracking and pointing plays an important role in the reliability of deep-space optical links
This pointing must be accomplished in the presence of attitude changes of the host spacecraft that are perhaps a thousand times larger than the laser beam divergence.
Deep-Space Optical Communications
9
Growth of the Deep-Space Comm. Capacity
Hamid Hemmati, “Deep Space Optical Communications”, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 2005
10
Optical deep-space communications can be implemented in two ways: Direct optical link: A direct optical link is set up between
the earth station and space-craft Atmosphere disperses and attenuates the transmitted and
received signals High power transmitter and large receivers can be used
Indirect optical link: the optical signal is sent from a satellite outside the atmosphere Atmosphere effect is mitigated Transmitter and receiver sizes are limited
Deep-Space Communications
11
METOL MARS-EARTH Terahertz Optical Link
Critical Event Monitor UHF:
1 - 16 kbps
Small Lander UHF:128 kbps (150 Mb in 20 minutes)
MER-Class UHF:
128 kbps (1 Gb/so
l)
Directi
onal X-band:
1 Mbps (1
0 Gb/sol)
X-band: up to 4 Mbps(28 Gb/2 hrs)
RF Back-up
100 W 1.07 micron Laser 1 - 10 Gbps
5 W 1.54 micron Laser 1 - 10 Gbps
5W 26 GHz 100 Mbps (RF)
12
Cloud opacity is an atmospheric physical phenomenon that jeopardizes optical links from deep space to any single ground station
Clearly, when clouds are in the line-of-sight, the link is blocked
Ground receiving telescopes need to be located in sites where cloud coverage is low and statistically predictable
To guarantee continuity of data delivery from deep space to ground, while the Earth is rotating, a global network of telescopes is necessary
The selection of the sites for telescopes belonging to an optical deep space network (ODSN) is driven by considerations based, among other factors, on cloud-cover statistics
Channel Model
13
Channel Model: Atmospheric Transmittance
Main Gases composing the Earth Atmosphere
14
Channel Model: Atmospheric Transmittance
Earth atmospheric number density profiles for individual species
15
Channel Model: Atmospheric Transmittance Transmittance spectrum at sea level with zenith angle of zero.
16
Channel Model: Sun Irradiance
17
Channel Model: Sky Irradiance Sky radiance spectrum experienced at an observation point at sea level for 23 km
of visibility and Sun zenith angle of 45 deg while observer zenith angle varies as 10, 40, and 70 deg
18
Merits of five deep-space communication link wavelengths.
Deep Space Optical Communications
Hamid Hemmati, “Deep Space Optical Communications”, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 2005
19
Data of a NASA optical link between Earth and Mars Modulation scheme: 256-ary PPM
Bit-rate: 1 Mbps
BER: 10-3
Range: 3.59 × 108 km
Hamid Hemmati, “Deep Space Optical Communications”, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 2005
Deep Space Optical Communications
20
To support deep space missions aimed to the exploration of the universe for the last four decades, NASA has designed and operated a global network of radio-frequency ground stations termed the Deep Space Network
A similar network can be used for optical communications called optical deep-space network (ODSN)
Today NASA’s DSN only requires three radio-telescope hubs to successfully operate the network. The DSN stations (located at approximately 120 deg of separation around the Earth: Goldstone, California; Madrid, Spain; and Canberra, Australia) allow continuous coverage of deep space from Earth
Optical Deep Space Network
21
Since the laser transmitter beam width from space covers a limited area on Earth it is necessary that the ODSN consists of a number of ground stations located around the Earth as a linear distributed optical subnet (LDOS)
The idea behind LDOS is to have the spacecraft always pointing at a visible station belonging to the LDOS
When either the line of sight is too low on the horizon (20 deg of elevation) or is blocked by atmospheric conditions (e.g., clouds or low transmittance), the spacecraft beam is switched to a different station (or network node) by pointing to the adjacent optical ground station
Optical Deep Space Network
22
Example of LDOS (star = telescope) architecture for an optical deep space network (ODSN)
Optical Deep Space Network
Hamid Hemmati, “Deep Space Optical Communications”, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 2005
23
Global Sites for Deep-Space Optical Communications
24
Usually the received photon count is very low
PMTs are used to detect signal
The operation temperature of the space-craft is low
Thermal noise is proportional to the temperature:
Hence, shot noise is the dominating noise
Poisson statistics should be used for analysis
System Model
25
For OOK: Probability density functions for transmitting “0” and “1” when
=Data average photon count/pulse =Background average photon count/pulse
Then
As discussed before, threshold is where the two pdf’s become equal Threshold = BER = When =0, Threshold=0 and BER =
System Model
26
For Poisson distribution
where
In the absence of background light
Performance of Deep-Space Optical Communication
For PPM
Symbol error probability is
𝑃𝑏=12 𝑒
−𝐾 𝑠
27
BER versus signal level for uncoded OOK signaling on a Poisson channel, for various background levels
Performance Analysis of OOK
28
Performance Analysis of PPM
BER of uncoded PPM on a Poisson channel, versus Ks
29
Performance Analysis of PPM
BER of uncoded PPM on a Poisson channel, versus Pav =
Ks /M
30
FEC in Deep-Space Optical Comm. Due to the low received power the BER is high BER is usually 0.001 Forward error correction (FEC) is used to decrease BER down to 10-15
Deep-space optical systems use high order PPM since they have high energy efficiency
Reed-Solomon codes are used as FEC High-order PPM modulation (256-PPM) with a high alphabet (8-bit
alphabet) RS code Accumulator (product) codes:
31
Outline
Deep-Space Optical Communications Introduction
Channel Model
System Performance
Optical Deep-Space Network
RF/FSO Hybrid System
32
Radio-Frequency (RF) Communications Low bandwidth
Stable Channel
Relatively immune to cloud blocking
Sometimes affected by heavy rain
Free-Space Optical Communications High Data Rate
2.5 Gbps commercially available (Tbps demonstrated)
Bursty Channel
Must have clear / haze conditions
Less degradation than RF in rain
RF/FSO Hybrid System
33
Enables FSO Communications bandwidth without giving up RF reliability and “adverse-weather” performance
Improves network availability: Quality of Service (QoS)
More options for adapting to weather Common atmospheric path effects and compensation (directional links) Physical Layer diversity improves jam resistance
Size, Weight and Power Focus Leverages common power, stabilization, etc. Economical use of platform volume
Enables seamless transition of free space optical communications into RF Environment
Combining RF and FSO System
34
Average Data-Rate of a Hybrid FSO/RF
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
FSO LINK AVAILABILITY (%)
0
1
2
3
AVE
RA
GE
DA
TA R
ATE
(Gb/
s)AVERAGE DATA TRANSFER RATE OF HYBRID FSO/RF LINK
FSO 2.5Gb/s
RF 10Mb/s
35
Short range applications:
Mesh networks
Cross-divide links (rivers, canyons, etc.)
Indoor systems
Long-range applications:
Air-to-air links
Satellite links
Wireless basestation connectivity
Applications
36
Hybrid RF/FSO Point-to-Point Link
Either switching between technologies or simultaneous use
Joint modulation/coding across two technologies
With channel state information, can optimize throughput
Without channel state information, can use variable-length codes (fountain codes)
37
Hybrid FSO/RF Two different modulations are assumed for RF and FSO links
with constellation sizes of M1 and M2
The links are assumed to operate synchronously
R1 and R2 are the data rates
Let C1 and C2 be the capacity of RF and FSO channel
respectively (Ci is a function of Ri)
From Shannon capacity we have
Then the throughput is
38
Optimal Joint Modulation/Coding
39
Short Range Hybrid RF/FSO Network
40
Hybrid RF/FSO Networks
Considering that FSO link has a higher cost, only a given number of FSO links can be used in an RF/FSO system
Assume that an RF network is given
The problem is to find the best choices for replacing RF with an FSO link
This depends on the topology, distances between nodes and the availability of FSO link (depends on the weather condition)
41
Formulate the problem as follows
The problem is to maximizes the following function
where
Network is modeled with a directed graph G=(N,L) i ∈ N denote the nodes in the network B is the number of demands lij ∈ L denote the directed link from node i to node j.
f (b)ij represent the flow of traffic on link lij
Dij is an indicator function of an FSO link from node i to node j
One unit time is divided into fractions represented by λk, k = 1,2, ..., K
Hybrid RF/FSO Networks
42
The maximization is subject to Input and output flow is equal for intermediate nodes
Input flow is zero for source nodes
Output flow is zero for sink nodes
Flow has to be positive
Sum of the time fractions is one
The maximum number of FSO links is M
Hybrid RF/FSO Networks
43
Here RF capacity is
CRFij=100 Mb/s and
CFSOij represent the
capacity of FSO links between nodes i and j
This problem can be solved using mixed integer linear programming (MILP)
Optimal throughput and bounds for the 16 node grid network and 28-node random.
Hybrid RF/FSO Networks