Production of Rigid PU and PIR Slabstock

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 Production of Rigid PU and PIR Slabstock

    1/9

    Page 1 of 9

    File No.: PU21020-0409

    Issue 2004-09-10

    InsulationTechnical Information

    Production of rigid foam slabstockfrom polyurethane or polyisocyanurateat low investment cost

    Siegfried Buschkamp

  • 8/4/2019 Production of Rigid PU and PIR Slabstock

    2/9

    Page 2 of 9

    File No.: PU21020-0409

    Issue 2004-09-10

    InsulationTechnical Information

    Production of rigid foamslabstock from polyurethaneor polyisocyanurate at low

    investment cost

    Summary

    This technical information sheet describes the

    minimal resources and equipment required to start

    and run polyurethane rigid foam slabstock produc-

    tion, for example in developing countries.

    Contents

    Page

    1. General introduction 2

    2. Equipment and resources 3

    required for operating a slabstock

    foaming plant

    2.1 Buildings

    2.2 Personnel

    2.3 Slabstock molds

    2.4 Technical equipment and apparatus

    2.5 Containers

    2.6 Accessories

    2.7 Raw materials

    3. Procedure 4

    4. Example of slab production 5

    5. Observations on personnel 7

    6. Shed plan 8

    7. Suppliers' addresses 9

    1. General introduction

    This information sheet is intended to show the

    minimal expenditure on buildings, equipment and

    personnel required for polyurethane rigid foam

    slabstock production.

    Polyurethane also includes polyisocyanurate rigid

    foam, as this is merely a specific variant.

    Slabstock manufacture by stirrer mixing offers the

    following advantages in addition to the low cost of

    investment:

    High-viscosity products can be mixed

    Formulations can easily be varied

    Pastes and colorants can be added

    Working by this method does, however, mean cer-

    tain disadvantages:

    Increased costs through greater losses of

    material (residues of about 2 kg in the mix-

    ing vessel)

    Costs of a polyethylene bag to line the mix-

    ing vessel

    A considerable amount of air is taken in.

    This is generally beneficial as it leads to afine cell structure due to nucleation. Increa-

    sed viscosity of raw materials and/or short

    cream times can lead to large individual

    pores (entrapped air) and lower thermal in-

    sulation.

    Products with short reaction times are diffi-

    cult to process. However, this applies only

    very rarely as the reaction times can usually

    be adjusted by varying the catalyst content.

  • 8/4/2019 Production of Rigid PU and PIR Slabstock

    3/9

    Page 3 of 9

    File No.: PU21020-0409

    Issue 2004-09-10

    InsulationTechnical Information

    2. Equipment and resources requiredfor operating a slabstock foamingplant

    2.1. Buildings2.1.1 Space for production, approx. 100 - 200 m

    2.1.2 Space for storage of raw materials and

    foam slabstock

    2.1.3 Space for cutting and packaging equipment

    2.1.4 Extractor on mixing unit Extractor on cutting

    machines Extractor on production units,

    possibly in storage area

    2.1.5 System for keeping raw materials at tem-

    peratures as near as possible to 20 - 22 C

    2.1.6 Wash basin and eye-rinse water at work-

    place

    2.2 Personnel (see observations on personnel

    under Item 5)

    2.3 Slabstock molds (approx. 2 - 3),

    e.g. 1 x 1 x 0.8 m, costs of wood + 50 man-

    hours + costs for small components

    2.4 Technical apparatus

    2.4.1 Balance, range up to 200 kg for mixing and

    production

    2.4.2 Balance, range up to 10 kg for addition of

    small amounts (table balance)

    2.4.3 Stirrer2.4.3.1 Powerful hand drill (sufficient for blocks up

    to 1/2 m3

    with low-viscosity raw materials)

    2.4.3.2 Fixed stirrer (output approx. 2 - 7 kW)

    2.4.3.3 Stirrer discs

    2.4.4 Drum lifting truck

    2.4.5 Band-saw for trimming and cutting

    2.4.6 Paper cutting device

    2.5 Containers

    2.5.1 Mixing vessel (size: the vessel should be

    about half full when it contains the batch)

    2.5.2 PE round-bottom sacks to fit mixing vessel2.5.3 Plastic container for rinsing liquid

    2.5.4 Measuring beaker for weighing or measur-

    ing out additives If the density of the raw

    materials is taken into account, balances

    can often be dispensed with when using

    measuring beakers

    2.5.5 Rubbish bags and bins

    2.5.6 If 2.5.2 is unobtainable, 2.5.1 should be a

    plastic container with which it is possible to

    knock out the residues

    2.6 Accessories

    2.6.1 Protective goggles

    2.6.2 Dust filters for sawing

    2.6.3 Stopwatch

    2.6.4 Rubber gloves

    2.6.5 Packaging paper for covering the floor andfor making molds for control pours

    2.6.6 Staplers with staples

    2.6.7 Scissors/shears

    2.6.8 Knives

    2.6.9 Felt pens for writing on the foam

    2.6.10 Adhesive tape for sticking paper to the floor

    2.6.11 Work table approx. 1 x 1m, 80 cm high, for

    putting down the accessories and the

    measuring beakers for the foam additives

    (catalysts, etc.)

    2.6.12 Release agent, wax or grease and sponge

    2.6.13 Drum-cocks

    2.7 Raw materials

    2.7.1 Polyol with drum-cock and drum lifting truck

    2.7.2 Isocyanate with drum-cock and drum lifting

    truck

    2.7.3 Blowing agent

    2.7.4 Catalyst

    2.7.5 Solvents

  • 8/4/2019 Production of Rigid PU and PIR Slabstock

    4/9

    Page 4 of 9

    File No.: PU21020-0409

    Issue 2004-09-10

    InsulationTechnical Information

    3. Procedure

    3.1 Prepare and assemble the mold 3 minutes

    Apply release wax 2 minutes

    3.2 Place polythene bag into mixing vessel 1/2 minute

    put in polyol 2 - 5 minutes

    (depending on quantity and viscosity)

    put in blowing agent 1/2 minute

    put in catalyst 1/2 minute

    Premix products 1 minute

    During the pre-mixing time, fill a separate container

    with isocyanate and then, with the stirrer running, pour

    it into the polyol and mix 1/2 minute

    Carefully pour the reaction mixture into the mold 1/2 minute

    Put on lid and secure with wedges 1 minute

    Clean stirrer with solvent 1/2 minute

    Remove polythene bag with residue (loss from mixing) 1/2 minute

    3.3 Mold residence time 10 - 15 minutes

    With densities over 60 kg/m3, the slabstock mold should be

    opened soon after the fiber time, and at the latest before the

    rise time, so the slab can relax without cracking.

    Rule of thumb: Slab height in cm = 100 - density

    3.4 Demolding the slab 2 minutes

    3.5 Take the demolded slab (preferably in batches of

    4 blocks per hour) to an external store where they

    should remain for at least 5 days 2 minutes

    3.6 Cutting: About 40 s are needed for one cut through a

    1 m long slab. This gives 28 cuts, each of 40 s, when

    cutting up a 70 cm thick slab into 30 mm sheets = 18 2/3 minutes

    3.7 Packaging: By the saw there should be a device in

    which the sawn sheets can be stacked. This allowssimple packaging.

  • 8/4/2019 Production of Rigid PU and PIR Slabstock

    5/9

    Page 5 of 9

    File No.: PU21020-0409

    Issue 2004-09-10

    InsulationTechnical Information

    4. Example of slab production

    The total quantity MA of the batch is obtained from

    the volume V of the mold to be filled, the desired

    average density RD, the quantity MV of reaction

    mix remaining in the mixing vessel and the differ-

    ence in buoyancy A between the liquid reaction mix

    and the finished foam (= weight of displaced air,

    approx. 1.2 kg/m at 20 C) and from the loss MG of

    blowing agent occurring during mixing and expan-

    sion of the reaction mix.

    GVA MMAxVRDxVM +++=

    The quantities MK of components are calculated as

    follows:

    nformulatioperweightbypartsof

    MquantityTotalM AK =

    Parts by weight of component per formulation

    Here is an example:

    Volume of molding V = 2.05 x 1.05 x 0.7 = 1.5 m

    Desired average density RD = 35 kg/m

    Buoyancy difference A = 1.2 kg/m

    Quantity remaining in mixing vessel MV 2.5 kg

    (determined experimentally)

    Loss of blowing agent MG = approx. 0.5 kg

    (determined experimentally)

    From the foregoing equation, the batch quantity

    is:

    MA = 1.5 m 35 kg/m + 1.5 m 1.2 kg/m +

    2.5 kg + 0.5 kg= 52.5 kg + 1.8 kg + 2.5 kg + 0.5 kg

    = 57. 3 kg

    Formulation:

    100 parts by weight polyol

    20 parts by weight blowing agent

    2 parts by weight catalyst

    120 parts by weight polyisocyanate

    242 parts by weight Total

    The individual quantities are therefore:

    Baymer polyol MPolyol = kg23.68100x242

    57.3=

    Blowing agent MTM = kg34.7420x242

    57.3=

    Catalyst MDesmorapid = kg0.4742x24257.3 =

    Polyisocyanate MDesmodur = kg28.4120x242

    57.3=

    The mold in which the foam is formed and cures

    can be a wooden box in the simplest case. To sim-

    plify demolding, the internal surfaces should be

    smooth. Release papers (for example polyethylene-

    coated kraft paper or soda kraft paper) may be laid

    or stuck in the mold prior to foaming or release

    agents (for example release wax) may be used. In

    the latter case, the mold walls may be lined with

    sheet metal (for example aluminum sheet) or

    melamine resin-coated sheets. Release agent sup-

    pliers can be found under "Suppliers' addresses".

    Slabs are produced as follows:

    The mold is set up, and a release agent is applied

    to the interior of the walls. The mixing vessel is

    balanced, and polyol, blowing agents and catalysts

    are poured in and mixed. The components are in-

    troduced in the following order: large quantities

    before small and low-viscosity products before high-

    viscosity products. Finally, the polyisocyanate com-ponent is weighed in or a weighed quantity added.

    The components must be mixed thoroughly and

    poured into the mold within the cream time which is

    sometimes very short (approx. 15 to 40 s).

  • 8/4/2019 Production of Rigid PU and PIR Slabstock

    6/9

    Page 6 of 9

    File No.: PU21020-0409

    Issue 2004-09-10

    InsulationTechnical Information

    Fig. 1: Front elevation of a slabstock mold

    Fig. 2: Side elevations and perspective view of a slabstock mold

    It is easiest to foam in open molds. The reaction

    mix is introduced into a mold (which is open at the

    top) where it expands and forms a foam slabstock.

    Although the pressure building up on the side walls

    is relatively low, it must be allowed for when design-

    ing the mold on account of the large areas. With

    polyurethane slabstock, pressures of 0.1 bar have

    been measured with a density of 35 kg/m and

    about 0.15 bar with a density of 60 kg/m. Polyiso-

    cyanurate foam develops higher pressures.

    The build-up of pressure may be counteracted by

    opening the mold 5 to 15 min after foaming of the

    block and allowing the foam to expand freely. This

    is achieved by loosening the wing nuts of the

    screwed rods. The foam slab which now expands

    beyond the mold dimensions should be able to

  • 8/4/2019 Production of Rigid PU and PIR Slabstock

    7/9

    Page 7 of 9

    File No.: PU21020-0409

    Issue 2004-09-10

    InsulationTechnical Information

    move unimpeded over the edge of the baseplate. If

    the mold is not opened after these short periods, it

    is necessary to wait a few hours to prevent the slab

    from tearing. The slab should be demolded when

    the pressure on the mold has become sufficiently

    low, and this moment should be determined ex-perimentally.

    The freely rising foam forms a domed surface and

    its cells are oriented predominantly vertically (ani-

    sotropically). The dome formation, which may result

    in a considerable quantity of scrap when cut to size,

    may be reduced if the foam is allowed to rise with a

    floating lid. Once the reaction mix has distributed

    itself on the bottom of the mold and the foaming

    process has begun, a lid is placed on top. This lid

    floats on the surface of the reaction mix and is

    forced up by the foam. The mold can also have a

    very simple design here, but should have smooth

    internal surfaces to prevent the tightly sealing lidfrom jamming. The rising lid may have to be guided

    by hand. The lid normally has a weight per unit area

    of about 40 kg/m2.

    A completely rectangular slab may be obtained if

    the lid abuts against a stop and compacts the foam

    slightly.

    Fig. 3: Foaming against a floating lid

    In some applications, the foam must have only a

    very slight cell orientation. This can be achieved by

    introducing the reaction mix into a mold which can

    be sealed all round and compacts the foam to a

    greater extent. The pressure applied to the mold is

    correspondingly higher. This foaming under pres-

    sure necessitates long mold residence times as the

    slabs might otherwise tear.

    After production, the slabs are left to cool for at

    least 3 to 5 days - usually in an open store - beforesheets or shaped parts are cut from them.

    5. Observations on personnel

    The number of staff needed for the foaming process

    depends on the number of slabs, the size of the

    slab and the amount of mix to be processed per

    slab. These points, together with the production

    time per slab and the quantity of raw materials that

    can be processed per year, are given in the table

    below.

    The figures are based on the assumption that one

    man can handle a batch quantity of 30 kg and two

    men, one of 80 kg. With larger quantities, a foaming

    machine is needed. At least two persons are

    needed to put on the floating lid if no crane is avail-

    able. When a lid of this kind is used, the amount ofcutting waste is reduced by about 5 % to 15 - 20 %.

    A lid should therefore be applied in each case.

    A figure of 3 - 5 % has already been included in the

    table for the amount of residue left in the mixing

    vessel. An overall density of 35 kg/m3

    was as-

    sumed.

  • 8/4/2019 Production of Rigid PU and PIR Slabstock

    8/9

    Page 8 of 9

    File No.: PU21020-0409

    Issue 2004-09-10

    InsulationTechnical Information

    On a large vertical bench band-saw, one man can

    cut up about 20 m3

    of foam slabstock in 6 h full

    working time. This represents approx. 150 tonnes

    per year. Two foaming machine operators produce

    as much slab material as two men can cut up on

    two bench band-saws (see table). It is thereforeessential to ensure proper investment in the cutting

    machines, i.e. considerable automation and per-

    haps mill saws should be provided.

    6. Shed plan

    Fig. 4: Slab production diagram

  • 8/4/2019 Production of Rigid PU and PIR Slabstock

    9/9

    Page 9 of 9

    File No.: PU21020-0409

    Issue 2004-09-10

    InsulationTechnical Information

    7. Addresses of suppliers in Germany

    7.1 Laboratory stirrer: Type LM 34

    Pendraulik Maschinen und Apparate GmbH

    Phillipp-Reis-Str. 3631832 Springe

    Tel.: 05041 / 40 61

    Fax: 05041 / 50 29

    7.2 Production stirrer

    Lehmann Maschinenfabrik GmbH, F. B.

    Daimlerstr. 12

    73431 Aalen

    Tel.: 07361 / 5 62 - 0

    Fax: 07361 / 5 62 - 60

    E-Mail: [email protected]

    7.3 Stirrer discs: e.g. Lenart rapid stirrer

    Vollrath GmbH & Co., Paul

    Max-Planck-Str. 13

    50354 Hrth

    Tel.: 02233 / 79 89 - 0

    Fax: 02233 / 7 87 49

    7.4 Round bottom polybags

    Nittel GmbH & Co. KG

    (Rau) Kelsterbacher Str. 18

    65479 RaunheimTel.: 06142 / 94 67 - 0

    Polymer-Synthese-Werk GmbH

    Landrat-von-Laer-Str. 12

    47495 Rheinberg

    Tel.: 02844 / 10 - 0

    7.5 Drum-cocks

    Will & Hahnenstein GmbH Fasstechnik,

    Wrmetechnik Anl. Fax: 0271 / 3 75 91 - 25Arnsbacher Weg 5 - 9

    57072 Siegen

    Tel.: 0271 / 3 75 91 - 0

    7.6 Balances

    Mettler-Toledo GmbH

    Ockerweg 3

    35396 Gieen

    Fax: 0641 / 5 29 51

    Tel.: 0641 / 5 07 - 0

    E-Mail: [email protected]

    7.7 Release wax

    Acmos Chemie GmbH & Co.

    Industriestr. 37 + 49

    28199 Bremen

    Tel.: 0421 / 51 89 - 0

    Fax: 0421 / 51 14 15

    IGEFA GmbH

    Bonnstr. 31

    50226 Frechen

    Tel.: 02234 / 9 57 21 - 0

    Fax: 02234 / 5 21 37

    Th. Goldschmidt AG

    Goldschmidtstr. 100

    45127 Essen

    Tel.: 0201 / 1 73 - 01

    Fax: 0201 / 1 73 - 18 31

    This information and our technical advice whether verbal, in writing or by way of trials are given in good faith but without warranty, andthis also applies where proprietary rights of third parties are involved. Our advice does not release you from the obligation to verify the in-

    formation currently provided - especially that contained in our safety data and technical information sheets - and to test our products as to

    their suitability for the intended processes and uses. The application, use and processing of our products and the products manufactured by

    you on the basis of our technical advice are beyond our control and, therefore, entirely your own responsibility. Our products are sold in

    accordance with the current version of our General Conditions of Sale and Delivery.

    The methods described in this publication for testing the fire performance of polyurethane and the results quoted do not permit direct con-clusions to be drawn regarding every possible fire risk there may be under service conditions.

    Publisher: Business Development Insulation

    Bayer MaterialScience AG

    D-51368 Leverkusen

    www.bayermaterialscience.com