Upload
james-cooper
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Processing and Product Quality Issues
Processing and Product Quality Issues
Keith Wonnacott Ph.D.
Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies
EBCR
Moving from Investigational to Licensed Islet Products
Moving from Investigational to Licensed Islet Products
EBCR
OverviewOverview
• FDA regulation of islets
• Issues related to islet product quality– Source materials– Manufacturing process– Product testing
• Issues related to islet comparability
EBCR
OverviewOverview
• FDA regulation of islets
• Issues related to islet product quality– Source materials– Manufacturing process– Product testing
• Issues related to islet comparability
EBCR
FDA Regulation of IsletsFDA Regulation of Islets
September 8, 2000
Dear Colleague: The purpose of this letter is to inform or remind you of how the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates allogeneic pancreatic islets for transplantation. These cellular therapies are regulated as biological products subject to licensing under Section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act). 42 USC 262. They also meet the definition of "drug" in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), 21 USC 321(g), and are thus subject to certain requirements of the FD&C Act. An Investigational New Drug (IND) application should be submitted for review by FDA and be in effect prior to the initiation of clinical studies in humans of allogeneic pancreatic islets for transplantation.……
EBCR
Islets as an FDA Licensed Product
Islets as an FDA Licensed Product
• What would be licensed?– The final islet cellular product – The manufacturing process is not licensed,
however, a licensed product is dependent upon a specific manufacturing process
• In the absence of extensive product characterization, the manufacturing process helps to define the final product
EBCR
Biologics License Application (BLA)Biologics License Application (BLA)
21 CFR 601.2:
The manufacturer…shall submit data derived from nonclinical laboratory and clinical studies which demonstrate that the manufactured product meets prescribed requirements of safety, purity, and potency
CGMPGLP
Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 BLA
Product Quality
Standards
Product Characterization
Applying Quality Standards During Product Development
Applying Quality Standards During Product Development
Product QualitySafe, Pure, Potent
Buildings and
Facilities
Packing and Labeling
Control of Components
Manufacturing Controls
Laboratory Controls/
Product Testing
Records and Reports
Holding and
Distribution
Organization and
Personnel
EBCR
Quality and ControlQuality and Control
Product QualitySafe, Pure, Potent
Control of Source Material Manufacturing
Controls
Product Testing
EBCR
OverviewOverview
• FDA regulation of islets
• Issues related to islet product quality– Source materials– Manufacturing process– Product testing
• Issues related to islet comparability
Product QualitySafe, Pure, Potent
Control of Source Material
CMC Question #1CMC Question #1Quality control of the source material (cadaveric organs)
EBCR
Source Material Control:Islet source material is variable
Source Material Control:Islet source material is variable
Because the source material for islets are cadaveric organs, it cannot be controlled in a traditional way because:
• Each organ is unique– Organ size, donor age, extent of fibrosis and
autolysis
• Organ procurement procedures may vary– Ischemia time, transport media, organ core
temperature
EBCR
Source Material Control:Ensuring quality source materialSource Material Control:Ensuring quality source material
A key component for ensuring control of a validated islet manufacturing process is the use of pre-defined acceptance criteria for the source material (donor organ).
Acceptance criteria should ensure that: • suitable donor organs (organs with maximal
potential for yielding adequate numbers of islets) are used for islet manufacturing
• unsuitable organs are excluded from further manufacture
EBCR
Source Material Control:Donor organ acceptance criteriaSource Material Control:Donor organ acceptance criteria
Acceptance criteria may include:
• Donor suitability determination
• Organ characteristics
• Harvesting conditions
• Transport conditions
EBCR
CMC Question # 1CMC Question # 1
Please discuss the data needed for developing pre-
defined acceptance criteria for source organs
Product QualitySafe, Pure, Potent
Manufacturing Controls CMC Question #2CMC Question #2
Quality control of the manufacturing process
EBCR
Manufacturing Control:Expectations
Manufacturing Control:Expectations
• In order to produce a product that is consistent in safety, purity, and potency the manufacturing process should be standardized and validated
• In-process testing should confirm the consistency of the process
• Licensed products, and the process by which they are made, are not experimental and have been shown to be safe and effective– Experimental procedures result in experimental
products
EBCR
Manufacturing Control:Manufacturing changes
Manufacturing Control:Manufacturing changes
• Manufacturing changes can impact product safety, identity, purity, potency, consistency and stability in unforeseen ways.
• Therefore, the product used in pivotal trials should be representative of the product that is intended to be licensed.
EBCR
Manufacturing Control:Current status
Manufacturing Control:Current status
• Investigators frequently “customize” an islet isolation procedure, based on a given donor organ’s characteristics, to optimize the yield of islets
• There are many variations in isolation methods; both within centers and across centers
EBCR
Manufacturing Control:Current status
Manufacturing Control:Current status
• Examples of manufacturing variations include:– Digestion time and temperature – Use of additives such as DNase and
protease inhibitors– Issues with the critical digestive enzyme
(Liberase)– Culturing islets prior to transplantation
EBCR
Manufacturing Control:Finding a balance
Manufacturing Control:Finding a balance
• FDA agrees that some flexibility in the manufacturing process is acceptable, if conducted using predefined criteria or algorithms within a validated manufacturing protocol
• These predefined criteria would establish conditions that would allow for processing variations based on the characteristics of each donor organ
EBCR
CMC Question #2CMC Question #2
Is it reasonable to expect that criteria or algorithms can be developed,
based on data collected during IND studies, to predetermine under what
conditions the use of a specific reagent, reagent concentration, or processing method is appropriate?
Product QualitySafe, Pure, Potent
Product Testing CMC Question #3CMC Question #3
Quality control of the final product
EBCR
Product Testing:Expectations
Product Testing:Expectations
• Release testing should be performed on a sample of the final product
• Some test methods are prescribed by regulation, and some are proposed by the BLA applicant
• Each test result should contribute meaningful information about the safety, purity, and potency of the product
EBCR
Part 610 Test Test Method Test Timing Specification
Sterility Specified Final Product Negative
Purity (pyrogenicity)
Specified Final Product Pass
Identity Not Specified* Final Product Product Specific*
Potency Not specified* Final Product Product Specific*
Product Testing:Biological Product Standards
Product Testing:Biological Product Standards
EBCR
Part 610 Test Test Method Test Timing Specification
Sterility Specified Final Product Negative
Purity (pyrogenicity)
Specified Final Product Pass
Identity Not Specified* Final Product Product Specific*
Potency Not specified* Final Product Product Specific*
Product Testing:Biological Product Standards
Product Testing:Biological Product Standards
EBCR
Product Testing:Potency
Product Testing:Potency
21 CFR 600.3 (s)
The word potency is interpreted to mean the specific ability or capacity of the product, as indicated by appropriate laboratory tests or by adequately controlled clinical data obtained through the administration of the product in the manner intended, to effect a given result.
EBCR
Product Testing:Challenges for potencyProduct Testing:Challenges for potency
• Results should be available before the product is released
• Results should show the ability to effect a given result– Potency will ideally correlate with the
biological activity that provides the intended therapeutic effect of the product in vivo
EBCR
Product Testing:Current status of potency testing
Product Testing:Current status of potency testing
• Examples of current potency assays:– glucose stimulated insulin release – or injection of islets under the kidney
capsule of diabetic mice to restore proper control of blood sugar
* However, these results are not available prior to the release of the product
EBCR
Product Testing:Considerations
Product Testing:Considerations
• An acceptable lot release potency assay is required for BLA
• If bioassays aren’t feasible for lot release, the applicant may provide rationale for other approaches to ensure product potency– Ex: viability + other characteristics
(dithizone staining)
EBCR
CMC Question #3CMC Question #3
Please discuss any assay or assays that are currently, or could be,
performed on the final islet product before patient administration, which may be predictive of the ability of the
islets to perform as expected after patient administration.
EBCR
OverviewOverview
• FDA regulation of islets
• Issues related to islet product quality– Source materials– Manufacturing process– Product testing
• Issues related to islet comparability
EBCR
Product ComparabilityProduct Comparability
• Comparability is demonstrating that critical product characteristics including safety, purity, and potency have not changed even when the manufacturing process has changed
• Products manufactured with different processes are considered to be different products until comparability is demonstrated
EBCR
Product Comparability:Test methods
Product Comparability:Test methods
Comparability testing may include:
• Analytical assays
• Bioassays
• Preclinical studies
• Clinical studies
EBCR
Product Comparability:Why does it matter?
Product Comparability:Why does it matter?
• In general, each license is for one product produced by one manufacturing process
• It is unclear how differences in methods to prepare allogeneic islets by various groups impact the characteristics of the final allogeneic islet product
• Data from different manufacturing facilities, or the same facility using different processes, cannot be used to support the same BLA unless comparability is demonstrated
EBCR
CMC Question #4CMC Question #4
What should be the key criteria (measures) for demonstrating allogeneic islet
product comparability?
Please discuss appropriate analytical assays, bioassays, preclinical studies,
and clinical studies that may be required.
EBCR
SummarySummary
• For licensure, a well-controlled, validated manufacturing process is needed to assure the safety, purity and potency of the final product
• This requires:– Control of all starting materials used– Control and consistency of the manufacturing
process– Testing of the final product to verify it meets
predefined product safety and quality standards