Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PROCESS HISTORY METADATA PEGGY GRIESINGER NATIONAL DIGITAL STEWARDSHIP RESIDENT MUSEUM OF MODERN ART DECEMBER 4TH, 2014
• Develop next generation of digital stewardship professionals
• 9 month residency • Funded by IMLS
• Cohorts in NYC, Boston, and DC
• 5 residents in NYC
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
MEDIA CONSERVATION
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
DIGITAL REPOSITORY FOR MUSEUM COLLECTIONS (DRMC) • Time-based media digital repository • High standards of preservation
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
METADATA
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
• MediaInfo • FFmpeg • METS file
TECHNICAL METADATA
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
EXAMPLE ARTWORK
Original ¾ inch U-matic tape
10-bit uncompressed file for preservation
Digital Betacam tape for preservation
Digital file for exhibition use
EXAMPLE ARTWORK
Original ¾ inch U-matic tape
10-bit uncompressed file for preservation
Digital Betacam tape for preservation
Digital file for exhibition use
EXISTING DOCUMENTATION • Correspondence with artist • Condition reports • Vendor reports
• Conservator knowledge of historical process
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
IMPLEMENTATION
reVTMD
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
reVTMD • National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and
AVPreserve • Audiovisual technical metadata • Section designed for describing process history
• Not widely supported, documented, or adopted
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
• Developed by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting • Released in 2005 • Designed to describe audiovisual media
• Current version: 2.0
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
• Pros • User-friendly • Designed for a/v materials • Resurgence in support and
development • Allow XML extensions at
almost any level in record
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
• Cons • Not as widely used as
PREMIS • Not already used in DRMC • Not designed specifically
for preservation • No event element • Not extensible to other
object types
• Maintained by Library of Congress • Initial release in 2005 • Designed for preservation of digital objects
• Current version: 2.2
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
• Pros • Widely used as
preservation standard • Very well supported and
documented • Already used in DRMC • Designed for preservation
of digital files • Able to describe any kind
of digital file
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
• Cons • Difficult to learn • Not designed specifically
for a/v materials • Requires multiple XML
extensions and semantic manipulation
• Limited placement of XML extensions
• Encoding and transmission of metadata • Sponsored by Digital Library Federation • Maintained by Library of Congress
• Initially released in 2001
• Current version: 1.10
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
OPTIONS 1. reVTMD 2. PBCore with reVTMD extension 3. PREMIS with reVTMD extension
4. PBCore with reVTMD extension wrapped in METS
5. PREMIS with reVTMD extension wrapped in METS
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
WORKFLOW 1
Generate metadata as
XML or JSON
Ingest with digital object in Archivematica
Inject metadata into existing METS file
Metadata parsed by AtoM for access
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
WORKFLOW 2
Template in Archivematica for generating
metadata
Ingested with digital object in Archivematica
Inject metadata into existing METS file
Metadata parsed by AtoM for access
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
WORKFLOW 3
Generate metadata as XML
XML file ingested as separate file in
Archivematica AtoM indexes
metadata
Metadata viewable through
submission documentation
viewer
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
WORKFLOW 4
Generate metadata as XML
XML file ingested as separate file in Archivematica
Metadata accessible in AtoM as file for download
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
reVTMD
PROCESS HISTORY | MoMA DRMC
